throbber
Aust. J. Chem., 1984,37, 1895-902
`
`Micellar Catalysis of Organic Reactions. XIV*
`Hydrolysis of Some 1,4-Benzodiazepin-2-one
`Drugs in Acidic Solution
`
`Trevor J. ~ r o x t o n , * ' ~ Timothy a an* and Steven R. orriso on*
`A Department of Organic Chemistry, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic. 3083.
`TO whom correspondence should be addressed.
`
`Abstract
`Kinetic studies of the acidic hydrolysis of diazepam and nitrazepam were carried out in the presence
`of micelles of sodium dodecyl sulfate (sds). The hydrolysis of diazepam was shown to occur with
`biphasic kinetics. This is consistent with initial hydrolysis of the azomethine bond followed by very
`slow hydrolysis of the amide bond as found for hydrolysis in aqueous solution. Nitrazepam, however,
`was found to decompose with monophasic kinetics consistent with initial amide hydrolysis. Reactions
`involving the hydrolysis of the azomethine bond were shown to be independent of acid concentration
`and subject to inhibition by micelles of sds. Reactions involving amide hydrolysis were shown to
`be first order in acid concentration and subject to micellar catalysis. The mechanistic change for the
`hydrolysis of nitrazepam on transfer from water (initial azomethine cleavage) to micelles of sds
`(initial amide cleavage), was presumably the result of the inhibition of azomethine hydrolysis and
`the catalysis of amide hydrolysis by the micelles.
`
`Introduction
`The study of the effects of micelles on organic reactions is currently of great interest.
`In particular, there have been many reports of the catalysis of organic reactions.'
`Less widespread are reports of micelle-induced changes of mechanism.
`In some cases, different products have been reported for reactions carried out in
`the presence of micelles compared with reaction in water. This can occur when the
`product of the reaction in water is unstable in the presence of micelles. For example,
`the basic hydrolysis of alkyl and aryl N-(4-nitropheny1)carbamates in water at 25OC
`In the presence of
`yields N-(44trophenyl)carbamate ion as the stable product.
`micelles of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (ctab), however, the product was
`4-nitroaniline. Decarboxylation of N-(4-nitropheny1)carbamate ion was shown to
`be strongly catalysed ( x 45) by micelles of ctab. Thus, a micelle-induced change of
`product, but not of mechanism, was ~ b s e r v e d . ~
`
`* Part XIII, Aust. J. Chem., 1984, 37, 977.
`Fendler, J. H., and Fendler, E. J., 'Catalysis in Micellar and Macromolecular Systems' (Academic
`Press: New York 1975).
`Broxton, T. J., Aust. J. Chem., 1984, 37, 47.
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2307
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685, IPR2019-00688, IPR2019-00694
`Page 1
`
`

`

`T. J. Broxton, T. Ryan and S. R. Morrison
`
`We have previously demonstrated some examples where the fine details of the
`mechanism of basic hydrolysis of amides are affected by micelles of tab.^,^ For the
`hydrolysis of N-aryl-N-phenylbenzamides, a change of mechanism from rate determin-
`ing solvent-assisted C-N bond breaking in water to rate determining hydroxide ion
`attack in ctab was o b ~ e r v e d . ~ In the case of N,p-dimethyl-N-phenylbenzamide,
`basic hydrolysis in water occurred via a slow protonation of the nitrogen atom in
`the tetrahedral intermediate followed by fast C-N bond cleavage, whereas in ctab
`the rate-determining step was solvent-assisted C-N bond-breaking?
`We are now interested in the investigation of systems in which a more dramatic
`mechanistic change is possible. We looked for a system where two possible sites of
`attack were available. Such a system is the benzodiazepinone nucleus (I), where
`nucleophilic attack may occur at either the 2-position, leading to amide hydrolysis
`[(I) -+ (2)] or at the 5-position, leading to azomethine cleavage [(I) -+ (3)] (Scheme
`1).
`Previous studies, in water, of the acidic hydrolysis of benzodiazepines of thera-
`peutic interest have been reported. These include studies of the hydrolysis of 7-chloro-
`(diazepam) (la)'-'
`and
`l-methyl-5-phenyl-l,3-dihydro-2H-l,4-benzodiazepin-2-one
`7-nitro-5-phenyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-1,4-benzodiazepin-2-one
`(nitrazepam) (lb).839
`
`In each case, the hydrolytic mechanism involves cleavage initially of the 4,5 azo-
`methine bond and then of the 1,2 amide bond to give the appropriate aminobenzo-
`phenone (4) and glycine (Scheme 1). For other benzodiazepines, e.g., oxazepam5
`cleavage of the 1,2 amide bond has been reported to precede
`and chlordiazep~xide,~~
`
`Broxton, T. J., Fernando, D. R., and Rowe, J. E., J. Ovg. Chem., 1981, 46, 3522.
`Broxton, T. J., and Duddy, N. W., Aust. J. Chem., 1979,32, 1717.
`W a n , W. W., Yakatan, G. J., and Maness, D. D., J. Phavm. Sci., 1977, 66, 573.
`Nakano, M., Inotsume, N., Kohri, N., and Arita, T., Znt. J. Pharm., 1979, 3, 195.
`Mayer, W., Erbe, S., Wolf, G., and Voigt, R., Pharmazie, 1974, 29, 700.
`Han, W. W., Yakatan, G. J., and Maness, D. D., J. Pharm. Sci., 1977, 66, 795.
`Inotsume, N., and Nakano, M., J. Pharm. Sci., 1980, 69, 1331.
`lo Han, W. W., Yakatan, G. J., and Maness, D. D., J. Phavm. Sci., 1976, 65, 1198.
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2307
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685, IPR2019-00688, IPR2019-00694
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Micellar Catalysis of Organic Reactions. XIV
`
`1897
`
`cleavage of the 4,5 azomethine bond. Thus, the mechanism of hydrolysis of benzo-
`diazepines is sensitive to substituents on the aromatic ring and on the amide nitrogen.
`Depending on the order of bond cleavage, intermediates (2) or (3) can be formed
`during the hydrolysis (Scheme 1). If the 4,5 azomethine bond is cleaved first, inter-
`mediate (3) is formed, while if the initial hydrolysis step occurs at the 1,2 amide bond,
`intermediate (2) is formed. In acidic solution, it has been proposed5,6 that intermediate
`(3) would accumulate in solution because the reversal of the first step would be
`inhibited since the nucleophilicity of the amino group would be reduced as a result
`of protonation. Thus, the reaction should display biphasic kinetics if initial azomethine
`hydrolysis occurs. Intermediate (2), however, is not expected to accumulate in acidic
`solution. This is consistent with many reports in the literature that lactam formation
`from amino acids like intermediate (2), is fa~ile.",'~ Thus, if initial amide hydrolysis
`occurs, the rapid equilibration should result in monophasic kinetics.
`The effects of micelles on the acidic hydrolysis of amide and azomethine bonds
`has been reported. Micelles of sodium dodecyl sulfate (sds) have been reported to
`inhibit both the acidic hydrolysis of amides13 and azomethine groups.'4 The magnitude
`of inhibition, however, varies and it was decided to investigate the effects of micelles
`of sds on the mechanism of hydrolysis of diazepam (la) and nitrazepam (lb). Since
`the site of initial hydrolysis of benzodiazepines is finely balanced and since amide
`and azomethine hydrolyses are subject to different degrees of inhibition by micelles
`of sds, we hoped to find examples where the mechanism of hydrolysis of benzodiaze-
`pines changed on transfer from water to the micelle.
`
`Results and Discussion
`(a) Diazepam
`Han5 has proposed that in aqueous solution the initial event is hydrolysis of the
`azomethine bond forming intermediate (3a) in equilibrium with diazepam (la).
`Subsequent hydrolysis of (3a) to (4a) occurs much more ~ l o w l y . ~ We measured the
`rate of loss of diazepam at 280 nm and determined the percentage of diazepam
`present at equilibrium (by measuring the absorbance at 280 nm initially, i.e. due to
`diazepam, and at equilibrium). In addition, we measured the absorbance at 280 nm
`for compound (5a) as a model for intermediate (3a). Compound (5a) and intermediate
`(3a) differ only in the replacement of the NH, group by H; it would thus seem reason-
`able that the ultraviolet spectra be similar. By this method, the percentage of diazepam
`at equilibrium was found to be 65%. This value was almost independent of acid
`
`(5b)
`
`NO,
`
`H
`
`l 1 Hendrickson, J. B., Cram, D. J., and Hammond, G. S., 'Organic Chemistry' 3rd Edn, p. 513
`(McGraw-Hill : New York 1970).
`lZ Sternbach, L. H., and Reeder, E., J. 01.g. Chem., 1961, 26, 4936.
`l 3 Linda, P., Stener, A,, Cipiciani, A., and Savelli, G., J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1983, 821.
`l4 Behme, M. T. A., and Cordes, E. H., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1965,87,260.
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2307
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685, IPR2019-00688, IPR2019-00694
`Page 3
`
`

`

`T. J. Broxton, T. Ryan and S. R. Morrison
`
`concentration within the range 0.013-0.5 M HC1 and is within 10% of the value
`obtained by extrapolation of Nakano's results6 to 68°C. Nakano determined the
`percentage of diazepam at equilibrium by the chemical separation of the equilibrium
`mixture. This result gave us some confidence in the U.V. method and in our assumption
`about the similarity of the U.V. spectra of (5a) and (3a).
`In an equilibrium such as (la)
`(3a) the rate constant obtained by monitoring
`(la) loss is in fact the sum offorward and reverse reactions (k, +k-,).I5 By using
`the value for the measured percentage of diazepam at equilibrium k,, the rate of the
`forward reaction (la) -+ (3a) was calculated from the observed rate. These results
`are in Table 1.
`
`Table 1. Observed rate constants for the first phase of the acidic hydrolysis of
`diazepam (la) at 68.5"C
`Loss of diazepam was followed at 280 nm. A very slow subsequent reaction
`was observed but it was too slow to obtain reliable rate constants. Rate
`constants for (la) -+ (3a) calculated as described in text
`
`[ H a
`(M)
`
`0 A
`
`104kl/s-1 for [sds]/m~ of
`100B
`2OOB
`
`40
`
`300B
`
`A In absence of sds 65 % diazepam at equilibrium.
`In presence of sds 40 % diazepam at equilibrium.
`
`The rate of cleavage of the azomethine bond is independent of acid concentration
`within the range 0.013-0.26 M HCI. Tight isosbestic points were obtained at 224,
`256 and 270 nm, indicating the absence of any accumulation of an intermediate
`during the establishment of the equilibrium between (la) and (3a).
`The percentage of diazepam present in equilibrium was similarly calculated in the
`presence of sds. By using these results, rate constants k for the forward reaction
`(la) -+ (3a) in the presence of sds were calculated from the observed rates. These
`results (Table 1) show that the reaction is inhibited by micelles of sds. The rate-sds
`profile showed a plateau between 200 and 400 mM sds, which indicates complete
`solubilization of diazepam in sds micelles at 200 mM sds. Tight isosbestic points were
`obtained at 225, 252 and 272 nm as for reaction in water. Furthermore, the rate of
`conversion (la) -, (3a) in the presence of 200 mM sds was independent of acid
`concentration within the range 0.013-0.26 M HCI.
`In both aqueous solution and in the presence of sds, it was found that when the
`pH of the equilibrium mixture (la) + (3a) was increased to pH 7, diazepam (la)
`was reformed in quantitative yield.
`This suggests that hydrolysis of diazepam follows the (la) e (3a) -, (4a) pathway,
`both in aqueous solution and in the presence of sds. Thus, initial attack occurs at
`C 5, leading to azomethine cleavage in both cases.
`The position of the equilibrium between diazepam and intermediate (3a) was
`displaced slightly in favour of the intermediate in the presence of 200 mM sds relative
`
`l5 Pannetier, G., and Souchay, P., 'Chemical Kinetics' p. 166 (Elsevier: Amsterdam 1967).
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2307
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685, IPR2019-00688, IPR2019-00694
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Micellar Catalysis of Organic Reactions. XIV
`
`to the situation in water. Since the rate of conversion (la) -+ (3a) is reduced in the
`presence of sds, an increase in the proportion of (3a) at equilibrium must be the result
`of a greater reduction in the rate of conversion (3a) -+ (la). This may be the result of
`different conformations of (3a) in aqueous solution and in the negatively charged
`micelle. However, recyclization of (3a) requires the amino group to be unprotonated.
`In acidic solution, (3a) is in equilibrium with the corresponding protonated form.
`This protonated form would be favoured in micelles of sds because of the electrostatic
`stabilization provided by the micelle. Thus, the recyclization of (3a) would be inhibited
`relative to the situation in water.
`
`(b) Nitrazepam
`Hans proposed that in aqueous solution initial hydrolysis occurs at the azomethine
`linkage. We have determined the percentage of nitrazepam present at equilibrium
`as a function of acid concentration. This was done as for diazepam, compound
`(5b) being used as a model for intermediate (3b). We found that above 0.1 M HCI,
`the equilibrium was displaced completely towards intermediates (3b), while at lower
`acid concentrations, significant amounts of nitrazepam existed in equilibrium with
`(3b). These range from 13 % nitrazepam at 0.05 M HCl, through 25 % at 0.025 M HC1
`to 38 % at 0.012 M HCl.
`The variation of the percentage of nitrazepam at equilibrium as a function of acid
`concentration probably reflects the lower basicity of nitrazepam, which contains a
`nitro group, compared with diazepam which has a chloro substituent. Furthermore,
`less reactant is present at equilibrium for nitrazepam than for diazepam. This can
`be explained by the fact that the positive charge in protonated nitrazepam is conjugated
`with the nitro group whereas in intermediate (3b) the posltive charge is not conjugated
`with the nitro group. Thus, the destabilizing effect of the strong electron-withdrawing
`nitro group is more severe for nitrazepam than for intermediate (3b). For diazepam,
`the chloro group is electron-releasing by resonance and hence stabilizes the protonated
`starting material more than intermediate (3a) for which the positive charge and the
`chloro group are not conjugated.
`
`Table 2. Observed first-order rate constants for the acidic hydrolysis of nitrazepam (lb) at 68.5"
`The loss of nitrazepam was followed at 280 nm. Rate constants for (1) -+ (3) as described in
`text, percentage of nitrazepam at equilibrium being used
`
`[HC1IA
`(MI
`
`0
`
`OB
`
`20
`
`-
`
`104kl/s-I for [sds]/m~ of
`40
`100
`
`-
`
`ZOOC
`
`300
`
`400
`
`9.60 (9.56)
`6.36
`6.95
`0.527 (0)
`6.02 (6.26)
`6.44
`7.08
`0.264 (0)
`4.40 (4.43)
`6.61
`7.72
`0.132 (0)
`3.05 (3.33)
`6.0
`7.70
`0.066 (13)
`2.20 (2.02)
`5.30
`6.90
`0.026 (25)
`3 . 9
`5.5
`0.013 (38)
`1.70
`2.32
`2.99
`3.51
`A Percentage of nitrazepam at equilibrium in aqueous acidic solution in parenthesis.
`Constant ionic strength, 0.527 M (KCI).
`Values in parenthesis followed production of benzophenone (4b) at 364 nm.
`
`1.7
`
`1 . 8
`
`By using these results, the rate of conversion (lb) -+ (3b) (Table 2), was calculated
`from the observed rate of establishment of equilibrium. The rate of hydrolysis of
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2307
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685, IPR2019-00688, IPR2019-00694
`Page 5
`
`

`

`T. J. Broxton, T. Ryan and S. R. Morrison
`
`nitrazepam (lb) -+ (3b) was constant within experimental error at the higher acid
`concentrations, but decreased at lower acid concentrations. This also reflects the
`greater difficulty of protonation of nitrazepam compared with diazepam. Similar
`behaviour was obtained at constant ionic strength (0.527 M with KCI).
`The rate constants obtained for the second phase of reaction (3b) + (4b) showed
`that this reaction was first order in acid concentration. At 0.527 M HCI, k, was
`0.2 x
`s-'. At these acid con-
`s-I, while at 0.264 M HC1, k, was 0.12 x
`centrations, the equilibrium of step 1 was displaced completely to favour intermediate
`(3b). At 0.264 M HCl, the second phase of hydrolysis was 59 times slower than the
`first phase.
`In the presence of 200 mM sds, we found that the rate of hydrolysis increased almost
`sixfold as the acid concentration was increased from 0.013 to 0.53 M HCI.
`At 0.013 M HCI, the rate-sds profile showed that the reaction was inhibited by
`sds and that nitrazepam was completely solubilized at 200 mM sds. Thus, at 0.013 M
`HCI, it appears that the major reaction pathway involves azomethine cleavage, as
`for reaction in water.
`
`Table 3. Observed first-order rate constants for the
`acidic hydrolysis of 2-acetylamino-54trobenzophenone
`at 68.5"C
`The rate of production of 2-amino-5-nitrobenzo-
`phenone was followed at 364 nm
`
`WClI
`(M)
`
`-
`
`1O4k1/s-I for [sds]/m~ of
`100
`200
`
`0
`
`0.527
`0.264
`0.013
`A Reaction was too slow to measure accurately.
`
`1.85
`0.82
`A
`
`11.5
`8.7
`0.99
`
`10.5
`7.0
`0.67
`
`However, on the basis of our results for diazepam, the observed increase in rate
`of reaction in 200 mM sds, as the acid concentration was increased, is not consistent
`with azomethine hydrolysis. Furthermore, at 0.527 M HCI, the rate of hydrolysis
`was faster in the presence of 200 mM sds than in water. Thus, it appears possible
`that, at 0.527 M HCI, the predominant hydrolysis pathway involves initial amide
`cleavage [(lb) -+ (2b) + (4b)l. To test this mechanistic hypothesis, we used 2-acetyl-
`amino-5-nitrobenzophenone (5b) as a model for amide hydrolysis studies on a
`nitrazepam-like compound. Rate constants for the acidic hydrolysis of this compound
`are in Table 3. It can be seen that the rate of amide hydrolysis was first order in
`acid concentration and, furthermore, the hydrolysis was catalysed by micelles of
`sds. Maximum catalysis was obtained at 100 mM sds. At 0.26 M HCI, the hydrolysis
`was more than 10 times faster in sds than in water.
`The possibility of initial amide hydrolysis of nitrazepam at high acid concentrations
`in the presence of sds was further indicated by the observation of monophasic kinetics
`for the reaction. As discussed previously, initial amide hydrolysis resulting in
`formation of intermediate (2b), should display monophasic kinetics, since the inter-
`mediate should not accumulate in acidic solution. The observation that the rate of
`production of the substituted benzophenone (4b) at 364 nm was identical to the rate
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2307
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685, IPR2019-00688, IPR2019-00694
`Page 6
`
`

`

`Micellar Catalysis of Organic Reactions. XIV
`
`of loss of nitrazepam at 280 nm is also consistent with this explanation. The produc-
`tion of benzophenone (4b) at 364 nm was first order throughout with no trace of an
`induction period.
`An alternative explanation for the above result is reaction through fast initial
`azomethine cleavage and subsequent slow conversion of intermediate (3b) into
`product (4b). To test this possibility, we first allowed nitrazepam to hydrolyse to
`intermediate (3b) in aqueous acid. Then sufficient sds and acid were added to mimic
`the normal reaction conditions, and the conversion of intermediate (3b) into product
`(4b) was followed. It was found to be much slower than the reaction of nitrazepam
`in 0.26 M HC1/200 mM sds. Thus, the predominant pathway for the hydrolysis of
`nitrazepam at high acid concentrations in the presence of sds is initial amide hydrolysis
`
`The micellar catalysis expected for amide cleavage of nitrazepam is masked
`because the rate constant observed in aqueous solution is for the faster azomethine
`hydrolysis. The reason for the mechanistic changeover on transfer from water to
`sds, is the concurrent inhibition of azomethine cleavage and catalysis of amide cleavage.
`
`Experimental
`Materials
`Diazepam and nitrazepam were provided by Roche Products Pty Ltd.
`2-Acetylamino-5-nitrobenzophenone, m.p. 155-157" (lit.16 157-15g0), was prepared from 2-amino-
`5-nitrobenzophenone (Aldrich) by acetylation (Ac20/HOAc). Sodium dodecyl sulfate (BDH
`biochemicals) was purified by the method of Duynstee and Grunwald.17
`
`Kinetic Studies
`Rate measurements were carried out at 68.5", in a cuvette kept at constant temperature in the
`cell compartment of a Varian 635 ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer. Stock solutions of the
`substrates (0.01 M in methanol), sodium dodecyl sulfate (0.4 M in water) and hydrochloric acid
`(1 M in water) were prepared in purified solvents.
`The required volumes of sds and hydrochloric acid were pipetted into a 50-ml volumetric flask
`and were diluted to the mark. This solution was then placed into the cuvette which was stoppered
`and placed in the jacketed cell holder of the spectrophotometer. The reaction mixture was allowed
`at least 30 min to attain temperature. The temperature within the cell was measured with a Jenco
`700C Thermistor thermometer. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 5 fi1 of substrate solution
`directly into the cuvette. The solution was shaken and absorbance-time measurements were recorded
`at the appropriate wavelengths for 10 half-lives on a National VP 651 1A X-T recorder. Rate constants
`were calculated from a graphical treatment [log(A, -A,)
`against time for reactions where substrate
`loss was being followed and log(A, - A,) against time where product formation was being followed)].
`For slow reactions, points were collected for the first two half-lives and the infinity value was
`calculated by using a computer program designed to give the best straight-line fit to the data. Good
`agreement was obtained between rate constants obtained by the two methods.
`Repetitive scans to demonstrate the existence of isosbestic points were obtained on a Hewlett-
`Packard 7041A X-Y recorder.
`The percentage of diazepam or nitrazepam present at equilibrium was determined by measurement
`of the absorbance of the model compound, the reactant (A,) and the equilibrium mixture (A,) at
`280 nm. The percentage reactant R(%) at equilibrium was calculated from equation ( I )
`
`l6 Mudry, C. A., and Frasca, A. R., Tetrahedron, 1973, 29, 603.
`l 7 Duynstee, E. F. J., and Grunwald, E., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1959, 81, 4540.
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2307
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685, IPR2019-00688, IPR2019-00694
`Page 7
`
`

`

`T. J. Broxtod, T. Ryan and S. R. Morrison
`
`The rate k of the forward reaction (1) -+ (3) was obtained from the observed rate of establishment
`of equilibrium by means of equation (2), in which I ( % ) is the percentage of the intermediate
`
`Acknowledgment
`We would like to thank Roche Products Pty. Ltd. (Sydney, Australia) for providing
`samples of diazepam and nitrazepam.
`
`Manuscript received 8 March 1984
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2307
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685, IPR2019-00688, IPR2019-00694
`Page 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket