throbber
Il Farmaco 54 (1999) 1–14
`
`Review
`Quality and functionality of excipients
`
`Giorgio Pifferi a,*, Paola Santoro a, Massimo Pedrani b
`a Istituto di Chimica Farmaceutica e Tossicologica, V.le Abruzzi 42, I-20132 Milan, Italy
`b Emmiepi-Pharma, V.le Arbe 77, I-20125 Milan, Italy
`
`Accepted 15 September 1998
`
`Abstract
`
`The quality of medicines depends not only on the active principles and production processes, but also the performance of the
`excipients. The traditional concept of the excipient as any component other than the active substance has undergone a substantial
`evolution from an ‘inert’ and cheap vehicle to an essential constituent of the formulation. The rapid evolution of scientific,
`regulatory and economic factors, the introduction of delivery systems and the advance in biopharmaceutics have led to a new
`interest in the role and functionality of the excipients. More than one thousand raw materials are available from a multitude of
`sources and are used today in the pharmaceutical industry. Their chemical structures vary from small molecules to complex
`natural or synthetic polymeric mixtures. Excipients are now chosen to perform a variety of functions to guarantee the stability and
`bioavailability of the drug substance from the drug product and its manufacturability on a production scale. Beyond the dosage
`form necessities, excipients are required to perform important and specific technological functions, particularly in the case of solid
`dosage forms. As a consequence, their characterisation must go beyond the simple tests for identity, purity and strength as
`prescribed in general by the Pharmacopoeia monographs. With the exception of the Textbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients, not
`many reference sources describing the physical mechanical characteristics of the powders for a specific role are available. Full
`physical characterisation of solid materials is now made possible with the help of high resolution analytical techniques on the
`molecular, particulate and bulk levels. This systematic approach is necessary to guarantee the behaviour of the excipient during
`the formulation and production phases. Some examples have been chosen in this mini-review in an effort to highlight the emerging
`trends in the development of ‘tailor-made’ materials. Three main approaches are followed by the industry: physical or minor
`chemical manipulation of materials already known, combination of two or more marketed excipients in order to reduce unwanted
`defects and, finally, preparation of new chemical entities with huge investments for the toxicity studies. Excipient harmonisation,
`standardised functionality tests, preformulation data bases and expert systems will contribute to change the conventional
`trial-and-error formulation approach into a far more scientific and technological development. © 1999 Elsevier Science S.A. All
`rights reserved.
`
`Keywords: Excipient performance; Pharmacopoeial standards; Solid material characterisation; Pregelatinised starch; Microcrystalline cellulose;
`Amorphous lactose
`
`1. Evolution of the concept of the excipient
`
`1.1. Traditional concept of the excipient
`
`The biological and analytical requirements necessary
`for the registration of an active principle as a medicinal
`speciality, whether of natural or synthetic origin, have
`
`* Corresponding author.
`
`always been at the centre of the pharmaceutical indus-
`try’s and health authorities’ attention [1]. Ever increas-
`ing demands and expectations with regard to quality
`have stimulated the development of new drugs charac-
`terised by higher assay and lower content of impurities
`[2]. However, the quality of a drug does not depend
`only on the characteristics of the active substances and
`the production process but also partly on the quality of
`the excipients. In general, the latter contributes notably
`
`0014-827X:99:$ - see front matter © 1999 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
`PII: S 0 0 1 4 - 8 2 7 X ( 9 8 ) 0 0 1 0 1 - 3
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2303
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685, IPR2019-00688, IPR2019-00694
`Page 1
`
`

`

`2 t
`
`o the performance of the drug and this, contrary to
`what was believed in the past, is fundamental to guar-
`antee the safety and efficacy of the final pharmaceutical
`product [3]. Confirmation of this ‘historical’ under-esti-
`mation of the role played by the excipient is already
`discernible in the definition of the traditional concept
`which saw it simply as a substance that facilitates the
`administration and preservation of the active principle.
`Some factors outside the pharmaceutical sector, such
`as the supply sources, the quality of the material, the
`manufacture and marketing of raw materials (Table 1)
`justify, at least in part, the scant attention paid to the
`matter of excipients up to a few years ago. This attitude
`was also engendered by the very low incidence of the
`cost of the excipients in the global cost of the com-
`pound, often lower than 1%. On the other hand, if we
`take into consideration the composition of a medicinal
`product from the point of view of its weight, it will be
`noted that the percentage of the active principle con-
`tained in the formula is generally considerably lower
`than that of the excipients. In the three drugs shown as
`examples in Table 2, the weight of the active principle
`varies from a maximum value of 12% in the formula-
`tion of sugar-coated tablets, to 0.5% in drops, to the
`
`G. Pifferi et al. :Il Farmaco 54 (1999) 1–14
`
`lowest content of 0.0008% in the preparations for am-
`poules. These percentages become simply infinitesimal
`if homeopathic preparations are taken into consider-
`ation, seeing that they are obtained from successive
`dilutions of thousandths from the parent tinctures [4].
`From the chemical point of view, even the so-called
`inertia of the excipients is to be accepted with reserva-
`tions. In fact, like active principles, excipients have their
`own internal thermodynamic energy. This results in a
`certain reactivity which, though low, may, when influ-
`enced by chemical and physical factors in the environ-
`ment, trigger some reactions leading to degradation,
`with fortunately usually slow kinetics. In the formula-
`tions in Table 2 there are some excipients containing
`reactive organic functions such as ethyl alcohol and
`propylene glycol, the terpenic essences in flavourings,
`iodised colourings,
`iron oxides and complexing (ex.
`EDTA) and reducing substances such as lactose. Con-
`siderable percentages of chiral excipients (starch, cellu-
`lose) are also employed and these may react with
`racemic active principles due to the law of mass, giving
`rise to diastereoisomers endowed with different chemi-
`cal properties and therefore different bioavailability [5].
`Another fundamental characteristic of the classical
`excipient, besides its so-called chemical inertia, is its
`pharmacological and toxicological inacti6ity. One cannot
`generalise in this case either when one thinks of the use
`that has been made of ethanol and boric acid, sulfites
`and tartrazine with their immunological effects, organic
`mercury compounds and some mineral oils, not to
`mention the psychological effects of excipients as
`placebos.
`From these preliminary remarks it is clear that the
`two traditional requirements of an excipient, inertia and
`pharmacological and toxicological
`inactivity, are not
`always met. The supposed inertia of an excipient is
`often more of an expectation than the result of a real
`thermodynamic paralysis. Only a thorough study in the
`
`Table 1
`The traditional excipient
`
`Source
`
`Production
`
`Quality
`
`Market
`
`From a multitude of natural sources, in general as
`a complex mixture of similar compounds, and from
`synthetic polymers.
`For chemical, food, agricultural and cosmetic in-
`dustries, partly and not particularly, for the phar-
`maceutics industry.
`Often not suitable for pharmaceutical use, tested
`by the consumer, not by the manufacturer, physical
`properties not qualified as excipient.
`Raw materials for commercial scale productions,
`with limited grade offered, low price and no trade-
`mark.
`
`Table 2
`Weight ratio between active principle and excipients
`
`Valium®2 guttae
`
`Diazepam
`
`Colourant E 127
`Alcohol
`Propyl glycol
`Saccharin
`Orange ess.
`Lemon ess.
`Colourant E 127
`Water
`
`Ratio(cid:30)0.5%
`
`mg 5
`
`to ml 1
`100
`600
`11.4
`20
`10
`9.2
`to ml 1
`
`Laroxyl® pills
`
`Turbocalcin® vials
`
`Amitriptyline
`
`mg 11
`
`Carbocalcitonin
`
`Colourant E 172
`Starch
`Lactose
`PVP
`Magnesium stearate
`Gum arabic
`Ethyl cellulose
`Colorant E 172
`Titanium oxide
`Paraffin
`Sucrose
`Ratio(cid:30)12%
`
`mcg 500
`10.6
`17.5
`0.9
`4.1
`1.1
`0.3
`mcg 25
`mcg 500
`14
`to 90
`
`Turbocalcin1vials
`Sodium chloride
`Sodium acetate
`Acetic acid
`W.F.I
`
`Ratio(cid:30)0.0008%
`
`mg 8
`
`to ml 1
`mg 7.5
`2
`
`to ml 1
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2303
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685, IPR2019-00688, IPR2019-00694
`Page 2
`
`

`

`G. Pifferi et al. :Il Farmaco 54 (1999) 1–14
`
`3
`
`preformulation phase will show which are the most
`suitable excipients, clarify their reciprocal interactions
`and evaluate their real contribution to the efficacy of
`the medicinal product [6].
`
`1.2. The excipient as adju6ant agent
`
`The majority of pharmaceutical dosage forms falls
`into the category of solid, semi-solid and liquid disperse
`systems, in which the active principle:s are considerably
`diluted, as we have seen. The excipients have therefore
`to carry out the functions of diluent, filler and solvent
`so as to give the dose of active principle suitable weight,
`consistency and 6olume from the galenic point of view,
`and make it more convenient to administer [7]. In this
`case, the excipient assumes the function of 6ehicle suit-
`able for the desired administration route, so as to
`transport the active principle to the desired place of
`absorption in the organism. The study and creation of
`more or less complex disperse systems require a suffi-
`cient knowledge of physical chemistry and physics to be
`able to assess their contribution to the stability and
`release of the active principle.
`Besides the traditional functions of support and vehi-
`cle therefore, the excipient is also expected to function
`as an adju6ant, from the Latin verb ‘adju6are’, that is to
`help the active principle to carry out its activity by
`conditioning its release from the pharmaceutical dosage
`form. In the National Formulary Admission Policy of
`1994 [8] there is the following definition: ‘‘Excipients
`are any component other than the active substance(s)
`intentionally added to the formulation of a dosage
`form.’’ To interpret the adverb ‘intentionally’ in this
`definition, we must remember the main administration
`routes of a medicinal product and the complexity of the
`roles the excipient must play in their respective formu-
`lations [9]. For each of the administration routes indi-
`cated in Table 3, the excipient must guarantee the
`stability of the pharmaceutical dosage form, the preci-
`sion and accuracy of the dosage, as well as modify,
`when necessary, its organoleptic characteristics (smell,
`taste, swallowability and local tolerability) so as to
`improve the patient’s ‘compliance’.
`
`Table 3
`The excipient in modern formulations
`
`Routes of administration
`
`Roˆles to enhance
`
`Oral
`Rectal and vaginal
`Inhalation
`Topical
`Transdermal
`Intraocular
`Intranasal
`Parenteral
`
`Organoleptic properties
`Compliance
`Dose precision and accuracy
`Stability
`Side-effects
`Desaggregation, dissolution
`Controlled release
`Absorption
`
`To these traditional roˆles are added today those of
`controlling and regulating the rate of disaggregation
`and dissolution, with possible favourable repercussions
`on the release profile of the active principle and its
`bioavailability, understood as the speed and amount of
`active principle
`released from the pharmaceutical
`dosage form and entering the systemic circulation. The
`pharmaceutical dosage form thus outlined can optimise
`the therapeutic efficacy of the medicinal product while
`simultaneously reducing its undesired side effects. The
`study of the formulation of a medicinal product on an
`empirical basis is now a thing of the past and Pharma-
`ceutical Technique is gradually and inevitably changing
`from an Art (witness the italian initials FSA: fai sec-
`ondo arte) into an Applied Science, which requires
`multi-disciplinary competence, as we shall see further
`on.
`
`1.3. The e6olution of excipients
`
`From the standpoint of what we have said so far, the
`excipient is no longer to be considered an inert product
`but an essential and functional component of a modern
`pharmaceutical dosage form [10]. What are the external
`factors that have contributed to this evolution, not only
`in the concept but also in the regulations governing
`excipients? In Table 4 certain elements have been sum-
`marised so as to facilitate the understanding of the
`rapid and profound change in the characteristics and
`quality of excipients which has occurred since the 1970s
`and 1980s [11].
`The globalisation of demand and economies of scale
`are the consequences of an industrial philosophy that
`rewards partnerships and mergers between pharmaceu-
`tical companies with the formation of important multi-
`national companies enjoying considerable financial
`reserves. This enables them to support the basic and
`applied research activities necessary to innovate their
`range of products in the future. The organisation of
`work ( just in time), too, and the size and scattered
`locations of the production plants are rapidly undergo-
`ing transformation and rationalisation so as to reduce
`as much as possible the time required for development
`and the number and variability of production batches.
`As a reflection of this, even the machinery, such as
`ampoule-fillers, tabletting and encapsulating machines,
`has to be re-designed so as to work at high speeds.
`It follows that it is necessary to have at one’s disposal
`new excipients that are compatible not only with mod-
`ern processes and production machinery (rotating and
`not conventional tabletting machines, rotating granula-
`tors, compactors, etc.) but also with inno6ati6e acti6e
`principles coming, that is, from biotechnologies and
`modern peptide synthesis [12]. Moreover, the interest in
`and wide-spread use of new therapeutic systems and
`modified-release forms is another factor that spurs the
`demand for more sophisticated excipients that can fulfil
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2303
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685, IPR2019-00688, IPR2019-00694
`Page 3
`
`

`

`G. Pifferi et al. :Il Farmaco 54 (1999) 1–14
`
`4 T
`
`able 4
`Factors impacting on the evolution of excipients
`
`Scientific and regulatory factors
`National Formulary as exclusive
`Excipient Compendium
`Over 100 new monographs
`added to NF
`NF Panel on Moisture
`Characterisation
`USP:NF Special Advisory Panel
`in Physical Test Methods
`Int. Pharmac. Excipient Council
`(IPEC) Foundation
`Int. Pharmac. Excipient Council
`European Conference
`Eur. Pharmacopoeia Group of
`Experts to Test Functionality
`The Int. Conference on
`Harmonisation
`Handbook of Pharmaceutical
`Excipients
`
`Technological and economic factors
`Higher productive power
`
`New excipients
`
`Globalisation demand
`
`(1980)
`
`(1975–1990)
`
`(1985–1990)
`
`(1991)
`
`(1991–1994–1998)
`
`(1994)
`
`(1995)
`
`ICH (1991), ICH 2 (1993),
`ICH 3 (1995), ICH 4 (1997)
`I ed. (1986)
`II ed. (1995)
`
`(tablet presses with higher
`compaction speeds, non
`conventional rotary presses,…)
`(for novel and potent drugs,
`for biotechnology products, for
`controlled release formulations,
`for new delivery systems,…)
`(organisational restructuring,
`merging, just-in-time,
`automation,…)
`
`specific functions within the formulation. These inno-
`vative formulations permit the optimisation of plas-
`matic concentrations of
`the active principle,
`thus
`increasing efficacy, the patient’s compliance and the
`added value of the medicinal product [13].
`The scientific and regulatory events that have con-
`tributed to the evolution of the excipients sector over
`the last twenty years, in concomitance with the eco-
`nomic and technological factors, are not to be ne-
`glected. Returning to the
`situation in the past,
`excipients were taken from materials of natural origin
`and in common use in the chemical and agricultural
`food-stuffs sectors and employed in the pharmaceuti-
`cal field just as they were, without further purification
`to improve the assay or their chemical or physical
`characteristics. Analytical tests were conducted for the
`most part within the Pharmaceutical Industry and not
`by the supplier of the raw material. The tests were
`often limited and not sufficient
`to characterise the
`excipients’ quality, much less their functionality. To
`give a few examples, only one type of ‘spray-dried’
`lactose was available for the production of tablets
`and capsules by direct
`compression. Magnesium
`
`stearate was widely employed as a lubricant, even
`though there was scant knowledge of its structure and
`lubricating capacity. Since 1970,
`the situation has
`evolved swiftly under the pressure of new knowledge
`of
`the solid state of materials and the ever more
`stringent qualitative requirements demanded by the
`Regulatory Authorities.
`Table 4 lists some scientific events, such as the in-
`clusion of over a hundred monographs on excipients
`in the US National Formulary and the publication of
`two editions of the ‘Handbook of Pharmaceutical Ex-
`cipients’, which contains monographs that meet phar-
`maceutical
`technologists’ needs much more closely
`[14]. Furthermore, at the beginning of 1990, the Sec-
`retaries of the three most important Pharmacopoeias,
`the USP, the Eur. Ph. and the J. Ph., agreed on the
`importance of harmonising the standards and the
`testing methods regarding excipients, so as to satisfy
`the requirements of the industry and their own re-
`spective Regulatory Agencies. Considerable progress
`has been achieved since 1990 (Table 4) as a conse-
`quence of a good four Joint Pharmacopoeial Open
`Conferences on International Harmonisation of Ex-
`cipient Standards and four ICH (Brussels, November
`1991; Orlando, October 1993; Yokohama, November
`1995; Brussels, 1997). The monograph on lactose
`monohydrate has reached the last stage of publication
`and
`those
`on magnesium stearate,
`saccharose,
`polyvinylpirrolidone as well as powdered and micro-
`crystallised cellulose are at advanced stages in the
`procedure [15,16]. Some testing methods on the physi-
`cal state, such as particle size, specific superficial area,
`poured and tapped density are also in an advanced
`phase of joint compilation.
`The renewed interest in modified release forms and
`in new therapeutic systems, as well as new production
`technologies, has contributed, as already mentioned,
`to research into new materials endowed with specific
`technological properties and their development as
`functional excipients. All these factors and more have
`changed the traditional concept of an excipient into
`the more up-to-date one of functional agent, that is,
`one that can fulfil several functions within the phar-
`maceutical formulation. They have also contributed
`to focusing the pharmaceutical technologists’ attention
`on the quality of the excipient, which also contributes
`to the efficacy and safety of use of the medicinal
`product, together with that of the active principles.
`
`2. Functions and specifications of excipients
`
`2.1. Functions of excipients
`
`On the basis of the preceding considerations, it is
`clear that excipients are no longer to be considered as
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2303
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685, IPR2019-00688, IPR2019-00694
`Page 4
`
`

`

`G. Pifferi et al. :Il Farmaco 54 (1999) 1–14
`
`5
`
`Table 5
`Modern excipient functions
`
`Stability
`
`Drug absorption
`
`Antioxidants
`Chelating agents
`Preservatives
`Stabilisers
`Buffers
`pH modifiers
`
`Manufacturability
`
`Disintegrants
`Plasticisers
`Drug release modifiers
`Penetration enhancers
`Wetting agents, solvents
`Film formers
`Bioadhesives
`Encapsulating agents
`Biodegradable polymers
`
`Dosage form necessities
`
`Specific techn. Properties
`
`Ointment bases
`Semisolid excipients
`Diluents,…
`
`Emulsifying, suspending ag.
`Gelling agents
`Lubrication enhancers
`Flow, compaction enhancers
`Propellents, bulking agents,…
`
`inert materials but essential components of ever more
`sophisticated and modern pharmaceutical dosage forms.
`Excipients are employed to carry out different functions
`that may be grouped into three categories, according to
`whether they influence stability, release and absorption
`of the active principle or manufacturability during the
`manufacturing process phase [17]. Excipients with this
`latter function may be subdivided in turn into those that
`are basic components of a certain pharmaceutical
`dosage form (dosage-form necessities), such as ointment
`bases, or into a second sub-group of materials that can
`fulfil particular technological functions, such as lubri-
`cants (Table 5). Thus, by varying the type, quantity and
`quality of the excipient incorporated, the pharmaceuti-
`cal technologist can correct and optimise the character-
`istics of the final formulated product.
`In the case of the manufacture of tablets and hard
`capsules, for instance, modern excipients must be suit-
`able for the preparation of homogeneous and flowable
`mixtures during the intermediate manufacturing process
`
`Table 6
`Modern excipient specification
`
`of the powders and granulates, so that the modern
`tabletting and encapsulating machines are fed swiftly
`and smoothly. In order to fulfil the multiple functions
`shown in Table 5, the specifications of modern-day
`excipients must add a series of technological functional
`measures to the normal characterisation of analytical
`purity [18,19]. The technological tests of physical chem-
`istry and mechanical physics are drawn up schematically
`in Table 6 and are as important today as the traditional
`tests that were carried out to ascertain the analytical
`identification, assay and purity of the active principle.
`
`2.2. Pharmacopoeial monographs and their limitations
`
`Confirmation of the gaps in the analytical specifica-
`tions of excipients may be gathered from reading the
`on magnesium stearate
`monograph
`(magnesium
`stearicum) in the Italian Official Pharmacopoeia IX
`Edition [20], where the following tests are prescribed:
`(cid:147) Composition: mixture of variable and unspecified
`proportions of magnesium stearate, palmitate and
`oleate.
`(cid:147) Title: Mg between 3.8 and 5%.
`(cid:147) Organoleptic characters: very fine powder, white,
`oily…
`(cid:147) Solubility: practically insoluble in water, ethanol and
`ether.
`(cid:147) Identification: melting point of organic residue, char-
`acteristic reactions of magnesium.
`(cid:147) Assays: colorimetric comparison of solution S with a
`comparable solution, appearance of chloroform so-
`lution of fatty acids.
`(cid:147) Acidity or alkalinity: blue indicator of bromothymol.
`(cid:147) Acidity index of fatty acids: between 295 and 210.
`(cid:147) Chlorine, sulfate and heavy metals test: within the
`limits.
`(cid:147) Loss on drying: equal to or lower than 6% at 100–
`105°C.
`The quantitati6e determination prescribes the com-
`plexometric titration of magnesium with zinc sulfate
`and sodium edetate.
`
`The tests on the functionality of the excipients comprehend:
`
`Control of purity
`Chemical characterisation: identity, purity, strength, composition
`Control of performance
`Physico–mechanical testing:
`relates to a specific application (what the excipient does)
`
`Physical characterisation:
`describes the functional attributes that make the excipient perform
`(why the excipient does what it does)
`Excipient specifications thus ensure the dosage-form necessities:
`Safety, Stability, Absorption, Manufacturability
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2303
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685, IPR2019-00688, IPR2019-00694
`Page 5
`
`

`

`6
`
`G. Pifferi et al. :Il Farmaco 54 (1999) 1–14
`
`The method employed to produce the raw material is
`not requested, the purity test employs dated analytical
`methods and totally absent are the testing of the physi-
`cal chemistry, physical and functional parameters,
`which characterise the mechanical physical performance
`of the lubricant.
`These shortcomings in the Pharmacopoeia’s mono-
`graphs (F.U.I. IX Ed., N.F., and others) are no longer
`acceptable because it has been demonstrated that chem-
`ically similar materials do not always give the same
`results during the manufacturing phase. For greater
`clarity, Table 7 lists some of the parameters of magne-
`sium stearate that it is important to know so as to assess
`its efficacy as a lubricant. It is to be noted that this
`excipient can be produced industrially in widely differ-
`ing crystalline forms and sizes by melting and milling or
`by precipitation in an aqueous suspension [21].
`The above-mentioned shortcomings are also repeated
`in other monographs on excipients in the F.U.I. IX Ed.
`as, for example, in those on lactose (lactosum), which
`do not go beyond the usual approximative description
`of the characteristics, the solubility in water and alcohol
`of its organic and inorganic impurities (proteins and Pb
`respectively) and instead emphasises the aspects con-
`cerning identification and assays (acidity, water content,
`specific rotation capacity and bacterial contaminants).
`But to which lactose do the monographs refer? There
`are several types of lactose on the market: monohy-
`drate, anhydrous, spray-dried; they are listed in Table 8
`together with the principal characteristics that modify
`the functionality of this excipient [15].
`These two examples of widely-used excipients confirm
`that verification against the traditional monographs is
`not sufficient, because the latter are based to too great
`an extent on simple identification tests and often out-
`dated chemical assays for purity, with no sort of testing
`of the functionality of the excipient itself. Furthermore,
`the up-dating of the monographs relating to the excipi-
`ents more recently used is not timely [22]. This type of
`
`Table 7
`Lubricant activity of magnesium stearate
`
`Manufacturing methods Melting of the starting materials
`Precipitation in an aqueous suspension
`of fatty acids and Mg salts
`Breaks the crystal structure
`Anhydrate, dihydrate,…
`Pure or mixtures
`Layered plates or flakes, 1.5–13 mm
`0.25–0.45 g:ml
`1–5–54 m2:g
`Lod: 50.5% at 80°C
`Dissolution decrease
`
`Milling
`Polymorphism
`Purity
`Particle size and shape
`Bulk density
`Specific surface area
`Moisture content
`Blending time
`
`Table 8
`Lactose functionality
`
`Single compound
`Optical activity
`Types
`
`Manufacturing methods
`Particle size distribution
`Specific surface area
`Density
`Loss on drying (lod)
`Water test
`
`Crystallinity degree
`Volatile impurities (ovi)
`
`Galactose–glucose disaccharide
`Dextrorotatory 54.4–55.9°
`a-Monohydrate, a-anhydrate,
`b-anhydrous
`Spray-drying, roller drying,…
`50–400 mm
`0.35–1.0 (m2:g)
`1.540 (a); 1.589 (b)
`0.1–0.5% at 80°C for 2 h
`1% for monohydrate and modified
`lactose
`Amorphous form may be present
`If organic solvents are used
`
`‘traditional’ specification is therefore not suitable to
`discriminate between batches of similar purity but with
`different characteristics in the solid state, such that can
`modify the processability and behaviour of the interme-
`diate and final formulation. The consequent problems
`concern the variability from one batch to another, the
`inadequate knowledge of the formation of the solid
`particles and their interactions. The traditional methods
`to test the physical properties also depend on the type
`of technique employed and often give results that can-
`not be compared from one laboratory to another. There
`are also no screening methods for materials that are
`sensitive to the conditions prevailing during the formu-
`lation process.
`
`3. Characterisation of excipients in the solid state
`
`3.1. Physical properties of excipients
`
`Given the numerous and complex functions that a
`modern excipient must fulfil, its characterisation must
`go well beyond the simple tests for identity, purity and
`titre as prescribed in the Pharmacopoeia monographs in
`general, and be extended to testing the technological
`functionality of the material, which is usually employed
`in the solid state. By functionality we mean the physical,
`physicomechanical and biopharmaceutical properties.
`This testing is complicated by the fact that excipients
`are not generally made up of single chemical entities but
`comprise more or less complex mixtures of polymers
`and synthetic and semi-synthetic natural derivatives
`designed for multiple uses in, for instance, food-stuffs,
`cosmetics and pharmaceuticals.
`Considering the clear prevalence of solid forms in the
`pharmaceutical armamentarium, particular attention
`ought therefore to be paid to the study of excipients in
`the solid state at various levels of complexity: molecule,
`particle and aggregate. In Table 9 the right-hand
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2303
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685, IPR2019-00688, IPR2019-00694
`Page 6
`
`

`

`G. Pifferi et al. :Il Farmaco 54 (1999) 1–14
`
`7
`
`Table 9
`Characterisation of raw materials in solid form
`
`Scale of scrutinity
`
`Property grouping
`
`Properties studied
`
`Molecule
`
`Molecular
`Solid state
`Crystallographic
`
`Microcrystal
`
`Particle
`
`Particle assembly
`
`Bulk powder
`
`Particulate
`
`Derived bulk
`
`Structure
`Phase analysis
`Polymorph.:solvates
`Crystallinity
`Solubility
`Mechanical
`
`Particle size and shape
`Surface
`Dissolution
`
`Packing
`Flow
`Compaction
`
`column lists the properties that may be studied according
`to the increasing state of aggregation (crystal, particle or
`group of particles). The first column lists the analytical
`methods that can be used to examine the molecule, the
`microcrystal, the particle or the bulk powder as such,
`even though it must always be borne in mind that the
`properties of the single unit are obviously correlated with
`those of the aggregates [23]. The manufacturing methods
`(precipitation, crystallisation, nebulisation, freeze-dry-
`ing,…) and the process variables (temperature, stirring,
`saturation,…) have a considerable influence on these
`properties of the material.
`
`3.2. High-resolution analytical techniques
`
`The recent improvements in high-resolution analytical
`techniques and in the science of materials, allow for the
`
`determination of even small differences in batches of
`excipients and active principles, even if they are equiva-
`lent from the chemical point of view. The characterisa-
`tion of the solid state and the surface parameters [24] is
`therefore fundamental first to assess and then guarantee
`the behaviour of the excipient in the formulation and
`production phases. Of particular interest are infrared
`spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance to deter-
`mine the molecular structure and possible chemical
`interactions (Fig. 1). Calorimetry and, above all, TGA
`and DSC analysis are often adopted to clarify stability,
`compatibility, degree of crystallinity and transitions of
`phase of the excipients. The structure of the single crystal
`or the powder can be examined with absolute certainty
`by X-ray diffraction. The hygroscopicity of powders and
`the possible formation of hydrates are revealed by
`isothermic absorption tests.
`Even though the theoretical basis necessary to predict
`the behaviour of solid excipients is not yet completely
`clarified, so that they could be designed to meet optimal
`requirements for a particular manufacturing procedure,
`it is possible, however, to plan a series of preliminary
`technological tests to supply useful information in the
`preformulation phase. For obvious reasons of economy,
`the tests selected and carried out will be only those that
`are indispensable for the formulator to overcome the
`difficulties encountered according to the type of formu-
`lation and the performance desired. Further, more so-
`phisticated tests to examine the matter more deeply will
`be carried out only if necessary. In the preformulation
`phase it is indispensable to activate a first level of enquiry,
`such as chemical and spectroscopy tests on structure,
`composition, purity and polymorphism at the molecular
`level. Routine technological tests will then follow on the
`
`Fig. 1. High-resolution analytical techniques used for pharmaceutical excipients.
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2303
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685, IPR2019-00688, IPR2019-00694
`Page 7
`
`

`

`8
`
`G. Pifferi et al. :Il Farmaco 54 (1999) 1–14
`
`Fig. 2. Testing procedure for powdered raw materials.
`
`granulometrics, specific area, density and tapped density
`at the particle level [25,26]. The upper levels 2 and 3 of
`Fig. 2 will be activated only when more exact information
`is required on the rheological and mechanical physical
`behaviour of the powders and aggregates in the particu-
`lar manufacturing process and with a view to obtaining
`the optimal performance of the formulated product. A
`thorough understanding of the specific properties of a
`material can lead to indicating which of them will be
`crucial to

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket