throbber
Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`--------------------
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`--------------------
`NALOX-1 PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC
`Petitioner,
`v.
`OPIANT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`--------------------
`Case No. IPR2019-000685
`Patent No. 9,211,253
`
`DEPOSITION OF MAUREEN DONOVAN, PH.D.
`Washington, D.C.
`Friday , November 22, 2019
`
`Reported by:
`MATTHEW GOLDSTEIN, RPR
`JOB NO. 172400
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`1 2
`
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2065
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
`Page 3
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
` ARENT FOX
` Attorneys for Plaintiffs
` 1717 K Street Northwest
` Washington, DC 20006
` BY: BRADFORD FRESE, ESQ.
` YELEE KIM, ESQ.
`
` WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY
` Attorneys for Defendants
` 725 Twelfth Street Northwest
` Washington, DC 20005
` BY: ANA REYES, ESQ.
` KEVIN HOAGLAND-HANSON, ESQ.
` JESSAMYN BERNIKER, ESQ.
`
`123
`
`45
`
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`November 22, 2019
`9:01 a.m.
`
` Deposition of MAUREEN DONOVAN, PH.D.,
`held at the offices of Arent Fox LLP 1717 K
`Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20006, pursuant to
`notice, before Matthew Goldstein, a Registered
`Professional Reporter and Notary Public of the
`District of Columbia.
`
`Page 4
`
`Page 5
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S (CONT'D):
`
` GREEN GRIFFITH & BORG-BREEN LLP
` Attorneys for Plaintiffs
` 676 N Michigan Avenue
` Suite 3900
` Chicago, Illinois 60611
` 312.882.8000
` BY: JESSICA TYRUS MACKAY, ESQ.
`
` ALSO PRESENT:
` JOSHUA H. HARRIS - BURFORD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
` MS. REYES: Do you want to state
`appearances?
` Ana Reyes for the respondents.
` MS. BERNIKER: Jessamyn Berniker and
`Kevin Hoagland-Hanson, also for the respondents,
`patent owners.
` MS. MACKAY: Jessica Tyrus Mackay from
`Green Griffith & Borg-Breen, also on behalf of the
`patent owners.
` MR. FRESE: Bradford Frese from the firm
`of Arent Fox on behalf petitioner and the witness.
` MS. KIM: Yelee Kim from Arent Fox on
`behalf of petitioner.
` MR. HARRIS: Joshua Harris, Burford
`Capital, for Nalox-1.
`Whereupon,
` MAUREEN DONOVAN, PH.D.,
`being first duly sworn or affirmed to testify to
`the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the
`truth, was examined and testified as follows:
` EXAMINATION BY COUNSEL FOR THE PATENT OWNER
`BY MS. REYES:
`Q. Ma'am, you did not attend medical
`school; correct?
`
`2 (Pages 2 to 5)
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`12345
`
`6
`
`789
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`12
`
`34
`
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2065
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685
`Page 2
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 6
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`A. No, I didn't.
`Q. You're not a medical doctor; correct?
`A. No, I'm a registered pharmacist.
`Q. You're not a clinician?
`A. Could you define what you mean by
`"clinician."
`Q. You're not a medical doctor who treats
`patients in clinics; correct?
`A. That's correct.
`Q. You never treated a patient for any
`purpose; correct?
`A. Not in a medical sense, no.
`Q. You have never administered Naloxone to
`a patient; correct?
`A. No, I have not.
`Q. You have never observed the withdrawal
`effects of treating a patient with Naloxone;
`correct?
`A. Not directly, no.
`Q. You have never had to treat a patient
`suffering withdrawal effects from the
`administration of Naloxone; correct?
`A. Again, I'm not able to treat patients.
`Q. So you have never treated a patient
`
`Page 8
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`Q. Your work is not focused on trying to
`develop FDA-approved products; correct?
`A.
`It's not focused on it, no.
`Q. Before preparing your report, you did
`not consult with a medical doctor concerning the
`administration of Naloxone; correct?
`A. That's correct.
`Q. Before preparing your report, you did
`not consult with a medical doctor concerning any
`of the opinions in your report; correct?
`A. That's correct.
`Q. You have reviewed the expert report of
`Güenther Hochhaus; correct?
`A.
`I have.
`Q. Güenther Hochhaus is not a medical
`doctor; correct?
`A.
`It's my understanding he's not.
`Q. He's not a clinician; correct?
`A.
`I expect he's not a clinician.
`Q. He does not indicate anywhere in his
`report that he consulted with a medical doctor in
`preparing his report; correct?
`A.
`I didn't see anything about that during
`my review.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 7
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`suffering withdrawal effects from the
`administration of Naloxone; correct?
`A. No, I have not.
`Q. You're not a clinical pharmacologist;
`correct?
`A. Not by formal education, but I have
`certainly education in areas related to clinical
`pharmacology.
`Q. Do you consider yourself an expert
`clinical pharmacologist?
`A. I have an awareness of the field, but I
`would not say that I am an expert.
`Q. Since 1991, you have never worked for
`any pharmaceutical company; correct?
`A. I'd have to look at my CV to look at
`dates, but if I -- that's probably about right.
`Q. Okay. Your work is not focused on
`trying to develop FDA-approved products; correct?
`A.
`I participate in early-phase development
`in conjunction with other sponsors whose goals is
`to develop an FDA-approved product, but most of
`the time in my research, my goals are not to
`develop products that would be moved forward for
`FDA approval.
`
`Page 9
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`Q. You're not an economist; correct?
`A.
`I'm not an economist.
`Q. You do not have any advanced training in
`economist [sic]; correct?
`A. No, I don't.
`Q. Before preparing your report, you did
`not consult with an economist concerning any of
`the opinions in your report; correct?
`A.
`I did not.
`Q. You agree that each pharmaceutical
`product is a formulation unique onto itself;
`correct?
` MR. FRESE: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: Well, each pharmaceutical
`product has -- may or may not have unique
`materials compared to other products. They may
`have unique properties, or they may have
`measurable properties that are quite similar to
`other products.
`Q. But each pharmaceutical product is a
`formulation unique onto itself; correct?
` MR. FRESE: Objection; cumulative.
` THE WITNESS: It may or may not be. It
`may actually be an identical formulation, and it
`
`3 (Pages 6 to 9)
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2065
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685
`Page 3
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 10
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`may actually have an identical manufacturing
`sequence to another pharmaceutical product.
`BY MS. REYES:
`Q. A pharmaceutical formulation can contain
`therapeutic and nontherapeutic ingredients;
`correct?
`A. Yes.
`Q. The formulation must be such that all
`components are compatible?
` MR. FRESE: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: The formulation and the
`product itself need to meet compendial quality
`standards and standards specified by the
`manufacturer and understood by the FDA.
`Q. They have to be compatible with each
`other?
`
`MR. FRESE: Objection; form.
`THE WITNESS: They have to meet
`compendial requirements for pharmaceutical
`quality.
`Q. The active therapeutic agents, the
`pharmaceutical ingredients and the packaging
`containers must all be compatible; correct?
` MR. FRESE: Objection to form.
`
`Page 12
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`I've referred to it, certainly. I don't
`A.
`know that my students have, but I don't recall all
`of the references in all of their dissertations
`and papers we've written.
`Q. Have you looked at your website
`recently?
`A. To tell you the truth, not recently.
`Q.
`It's a reference book listed on your
`website. Would that surprise you?
`A. On my personal website?
`Q. On the Iowa website for your graduate
`school, the one that you participate in.
`A.
`I guess I'd like to see what you're
`actually talking about.
`Q. Sure. No problem.
`(Deposition Exhibit 2040, University of
`Iowa Printout, was marked for identification and
`attached to the transcript.)
` MR. FRESE: I object to this document.
`It's outside the scope of the deposition.
` MS. REYES: Okay. You do that.
` I'm going to introduce Exhibit 1, which
`is -- Exhibit 2040, which is a portion of the Iowa
`graduate school website.
`
`Page 11
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
` THE WITNESS: All of the things you've
`listed, the pharmaceutical product, the
`ingredients in that, the container, the packaging
`system, again, they must meet quality
`specifications as determined by the developer.
`And they have been evaluated by the FDA and
`approved for the characteristics of that
`particular product and its packaging.
`BY MS. REYES:
`Q. And that would include that they would
`have to be compatible with each other; correct?
`A. Not in an infinite sense.
`Q. What about in a finite sense?
`A. The quality standards define the finite
`sense --
`Q. Okay. Ma'am --
`A.
`-- by which materials are compatible or
`interact with one another or don't interact with
`one another.
`Q. Ansel's Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and
`Drug Delivery is a textbook in your field?
`A.
`I'm familiar with that, yes.
`Q.
`It is a textbook in your field that you
`and your students refer to; right?
`
`Page 13
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`BY MS. REYES:
`Q. Here you go.
`A. Actually, I don't think you correctly
`characterized where this came from.
`Q. Okay. You tell me where it comes from.
`A. This appears to me to be a hard copy of
`the web page -- of a web page that is curated by
`our University of Iowa libraries. And it also
`appears to be in the subsection that is likely the
`guides or the subset of materials that our
`university libraries have placed into sort of an
`easy access site based on subject matter.
`Q.
`If you turn to page 5 of this, ma'am, do
`you see that it says, "Compounding reference
`resources"?
`A. Yes.
`Q. And that one of the compounding
`reference resources is Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms
`and Drug Delivery, which is the Ansel's that I
`just cited to you?
`A.
`It doesn't indicate that it's the Ansel
`text. It just --
`Q. Was there a different text that's
`Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery,
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`4 (Pages 10 to 13)
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2065
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Page 14
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`
`ma'am?
`A. There actually may be.
`Q. But do you know, sitting here today?
`A.
`I'm not aware of exact titles of all the
`reference texts in the area.
`Q. You just don't know? You've been doing
`this for how long? How many decades have you been
`teaching?
` MR. FRESE: Objection to form.
`Q. How many decades have you been teaching
`in this area, ma'am?
`A.
`I've been teaching about 30 years.
`Q. Okay. In the 30 years that you've been
`teaching, you know that there's an Ansel's
`Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery
`textbook; correct?
`A.
`I believe the name actually for the
`series of textbooks that Ansel has edited actually
`may have changed during the time period of those
`texts, but I will -- I will choose to believe that
`you've given me the correct title.
`Q. Thank you.
`And this Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and
`Drug Delivery, if we could turn to that, that is
`
`Page 16
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`Q. And it's the ninth edition. And if you
`look at the -- if you look at this page right
`here, it's a 2011 date.
`A. Oh, so you've indicated the most recent
`copyright date as 2011.
`Q. And this would be prior art?
`A.
`It's my understanding it would be prior
`art.
`Q. Okay. And if we could --
`MS. REYES: Now it's back in the scope.
`Q. Now, if we could please turn to page 2.
`If you could go to the second column, third
`paragraph, it says, "Each particular
`pharmaceutical product."
` Do you see that?
`A. Yes.
`Q. So Ansel's, the prior art textbook
`referenced at the Iowa library, says, "Each
`particular pharmaceutical product is a formulation
`unique onto [sic] itself."
` Do you see that?
`A.
`I see that statement. However --
`Q. Okay. Ma'am, that's all I asked you.
`That's all I asked you, if you saw it.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 15
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`what your library tells people is a reference
`book.
` MR. FRESE: Is this marked as an
`exhibit?
` MS. REYES: Yeah, 2041.
` (Deposition Exhibit 2041, Ansel's
`Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery
`Systems 9th Edition, was marked for identification
`and attached to the transcript.)
` MR. FRESE: Okay. I'm going to object
`to this as outside the scope of the deposition and
`an improper excerpt of a larger reference.
` MS. REYES: Okay.
`BY MS. REYES:
`Q. Ma'am, Exhibit 2041 is an excerpt from
`Ansel's Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug
`Delivery Systems, the ninth edition.
` Do you see that?
`A. Well, I see the cover page that looks
`like the cover page that I've seen.
`Q. Okay.
`A. And certainly this title page indicates
`what I would expect from the title page of that
`textbook series.
`
`Page 17
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`A. Okay.
`Q. And that is prior art that the POSA
`would be aware of; correct?
`A.
`I don't know. I haven't had a chance to
`review this. It's a single sentence that you've
`asked me about.
`Q. And I'm asking you --
`A.
`I see that sentence on the page.
`Q. Yes, the sentence is on the page.
`And the POSA would see that sentence on
`the page; correct?
`A. The POSA would see the sentence on the
`page --
`Q. Okay. Thank you.
`A.
`-- but the POSA would understand that
`they read single sentences in the context of the
`full document.
`Q. Sure. Fair enough.
`"In addition to the" -- and it goes on,
`"In addition to the active therapeutic
`ingredients, a pharmaceutical formulation contains
`a number of nontherapeutic or pharmaceutical
`ingredients."
` And I think you gave me that one.
`
`5 (Pages 14 to 17)
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2065
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685
`Page 5
`
`

`

`Page 18
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
` "It is through their use that a
`formulation achieves its unique composition and
`characteristic physical appearance."
` Do you see that?
`A.
`I see those words on the page.
`Q. Okay. Thank you.
`Now, "A preserved preparation must be
`shelf tested to determine its stability for the
`intended shelf life of the product"; correct?
` MR. FRESE: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: I don't know that I would
`agree with the wording to that.
`Q. What do you disagree about that wording?
`A.
`I would like you to repeat it back to
`me, please.
`Q. "A preserved preparation must be shelf
`tested to determine its stability for the intended
`life of product."
`A.
`I don't understand. And I don't use the
`phrase "shelf tested," so I would need to
`understand what the context of that term is.
`Q. Okay. Well, if you could turn to
`page 141 of Ansel's there. If you could go to the
`second column. At the end, the last sentence, "In
`
`Page 20
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`entire document and --
`BY MS. REYES:
`Q.
`I'm not asking you about the entire
`document, ma'am. I'm asking you about the phrase
`"shelf tested."
` Are you telling me that in 30 years, you
`can't understand the words "shelf tested"?
` MR. FRESE: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: It's not a phrase that I
`use. I --
`Q. Okay. That's fine.
`A.
`I need to understand the phrase choice
`by the author to make sure that I understand and
`can use the term in the same way.
`Q. Got it. Thirty years of [sic] decades
`of experience, and you don't understand the phrase
`"shelf tested." Okay.
` "In a formulation, the active ingredient
`must be bioavailable to the patient throughout the
`expected shelf life of the preparation"; is that
`right?
`I heard about the first two words of
`A.
`that sentence. So if you would read it back
`slowly, I will try to concentrate and determine
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 19
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`all instances, the preserved preparation must be
`biologically tested to determine its safety and
`efficacy."
` Do you see that?
` MR. FRESE: Objection to the fact that
`the document doesn't include the pages before 140.
` MS. REYES: That's fine.
`BY MS. REYES:
`Q. "In all instances, the preserved
`preparation must be biologically tested to
`determine its safety and efficacy."
` Do you see that?
`A.
`I see the words on the page.
`Q. "And shelf tested to determine its
`stability for the intended shelf life of the
`product."
`A.
`I see those words on this page.
`Q. With 30 -- decades of experience in the
`pharmaceutical field, you do not understand a
`textbook reference to "shelf tested" of
`pharmaceutical product; is that your testimony?
` MR. FRESE: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: After years of experience
`in the field, I learn and I know to read the
`
`Page 21
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`whether I can agree with it.
`Q. "In a formulation, the active ingredient
`must be bioavailable to the patient throughout the
`expected shelf life of the preparation"; correct?
`A.
`It depends on the intended use of the
`preparation.
`Q.
`If the intended use of the preparation
`is to treat a patient, say, for example,
`potentially dying of an overdose, the active
`ingredient must be bioavailable to the patient
`throughout the expected shelf life of the
`preparation; correct?
` MR. FRESE: Objection; foundation.
` THE WITNESS: Well, again, it depends on
`the intended use of the product, how it's
`formulated, how it's delivered.
`Q.
`I gave you the intended use, to treat
`someone dying of an overdose.
` You would want the active ingredient in
`a product to treat someone dying of an overdose to
`be bioavailable to the patient throughout the
`expected shelf life of the preparation; correct?
` MR. FRESE: Objection; foundation.
` THE WITNESS: I would need to have -- or
`
`6 (Pages 18 to 21)
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2065
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685
`Page 6
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 22
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`I would need to have the terminology
`"bioavailable" defined for this proceeding.
`Because that terminology gets used in -- within
`the lay public and it has an inaccurate
`understanding by many.
`BY MS. REYES:
`Q. Okay. Let me make this simple, because
`I'm just an English major from a school in
`Kentucky.
` The active ingredient has to work;
`right? It has to work throughout the expected
`shelf life of the preparation. You're not going
`to -- you're really going to fight me on that?
` MR. FRESE: Objection; argumentative.
` THE WITNESS: The FDA has approved the
`product to meet the efficacy standards that were
`described by the developer and that are present in
`the label.
`Q. And that would include an expected shelf
`life for the product; right?
`A. The products themselves have a
`data-driven expiration date placed on each
`manufactured lot.
`Q. Yeah.
`
`Page 24
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`Q. The efficacy standard includes that the
`active ingredient has to work; right?
` MR. FRESE: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: The product needs to
`meet -- or continue to meet the efficacy and
`product quality standards that were reviewed and
`approved by the FDA --
`Q. Which would include that the product --
`A.
`-- during its shelf life.
`Q. Why won't you just give me that the
`product has to work? I don't understand why this
`is hard. The product has to work; right?
` MR. FRESE: Objection; argumentative.
` THE WITNESS: Because I understand what
`the FDA approves and I understand what
`expectations for the term "work" might be, and
`they might be beyond what the FDA has approved.
`Q. You think the FDA approves drugs that
`don't work.
`A. That is not what I said.
`Q.
`I think that is exactly what you said,
`but we'll move on.
` Now, when you choose excipients, many
`considerations go into deciding which excipients
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 23
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
` And the active ingredient has to work
`throughout the -- through to the expiration date
`at least; right?
`A. Again, it has to meet the efficacy
`standards that were established during the
`evaluation of that product and presented to the
`FDA.
`Q. Okay. It has to work; right? I mean --
`A.
`It has --
`Q.
`-- are you going to tell me it doesn't
`have to work?
`A.
`It has to meet the efficacy standards
`that were presented to the FDA as the product
`efficacy, and they have to remain in effect under
`the range of effects --
`Q. Okay. So if I --
`A.
`-- through the --
`Q. So if I send --
`A.
`-- shelf life of the product.
`Q. So if I send a product to the FDA and I
`was like, hey, this product doesn't work for its
`entire shelf life, please approve it anyway, the
`FDA would be like, no, it has to work; right?
` MR. FRESE: Objection to form.
`
`Page 25
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`to use in a formulation; correct?
` MR. FRESE: Objection to form and
`foundation.
` THE WITNESS: There are considerations
`about the excipients that are selected and
`included in formulations, yes.
`BY MS. REYES:
`Q. Okay. And one of the considerations is
`whether the preservative has adequate stability?
` MR. FRESE: Objection; form and
`foundation.
` THE WITNESS: Whether the preservative
`has adequate stability?
`Q. Uh-huh.
`A. So what type of stability are you
`referring to?
`Q. Okay. I'll withdraw that question.
`Another consideration is whether
`chemical decomposition -- another consideration is
`whether chemical decomposition will reduce the
`preservative's concentration; correct?
` MR. FRESE: Objection; form and
`foundation.
` THE WITNESS: All of the materials that
`
`7 (Pages 22 to 25)
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2065
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685
`Page 7
`
`

`

`Page 26
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`are included in a formulation, especially those
`that have an actual prescribed function, need to
`maintain that functional ability within the
`product specifications as approved by the FDA and
`that meet the quality standards for that product.
`BY MS. REYES:
`Q. Okay. And another consideration is
`whether the preservative interferes with any of
`the other ingredients in the formulation; correct?
` MR. FRESE: Objection; foundation.
` THE WITNESS: That certainly might be
`something that a formulator would evaluate, but
`there are materials that interact with other
`materials in formulations that are currently
`approved by the FDA and meet quality standards and
`function as were approved for use in that product.
`Q. Okay. And another consideration is
`whether or not the formulation interferes with the
`effectiveness of the preservative; correct?
` MR. FRESE: Objection to form and
`foundation.
` MS. REYES: What exactly is your
`foundation --
` MR. FRESE: You haven't established that
`
`Page 28
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`reference source, I'd like to see the reference
`source.
`Q. Let me read it to you again.
`Fair to say that it is essential for the
`research pharmacist to examine all formulative
`ingredients, as one affects the other, to ensure
`that each agent is free to do its job?
`A. Well, that would certainly be a method
`that I would teach to my students as they are
`starting as formulators. I certainly am aware of
`other more senior formulators or other individuals
`who may not always conduct formulation studies in
`that way. But at some point in time, if there are
`reasons to evaluate individual interactions, those
`can and should be done.
`Q. Okay. Another consideration is whether
`the preservative adversely affects the
`preparation's container or closure; correct?
`A. Again, the pharmaceutical quality
`standards give that all of the interactions
`between the container closure and the formulation
`components at least be understood.
`Q. Okay. And fair to say that the
`preservative must not interact with a container or
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 27
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`this is a formulation that contains a
`preservative.
` MS. REYES: Okay.
`BY MS. REYES:
`Q. Sorry. Another consideration on whether
`or not to use a preservative in a formulation,
`which I think I started this line of questioning
`with, is whether or not the other ingredients in
`the formulation interfere with the effectiveness
`of the preservative; correct?
`A. Maintaining the effectiveness of the
`preservative is something that is considered and
`is tested and is -- has specifications built
`around it for the final evaluation of the product.
`Q. Okay. Is it fair to say that it is
`essential for the research pharmacist to examine
`all formulative ingredients, as one affects the
`other, to ensure that each agent is free to do its
`job?
` MR. FRESE: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: I think I'd like to hear
`that statement again.
`Q. Sure.
`A. And if you're reading it from a
`
`Page 29
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`with an enclosure, such as a rubber or plastic cap
`or liner; correct?
`A. No, I don't believe that's correct.
`Q. Okay. Could you turn back to page 140
`of Ansel's, please. All right.
` Do you see the second column of
`page 140? If you start on the second full
`sentence, "In addition," do you see that?
`A. Second column, second sentence?
`Q. "In addition, the preservative must
`not" --
`A. On page 140, my second column, second
`sentence starts "It is essential."
`Q. Second full sentence.
`A. Okay.
`Q. "In addition" -- so this is Ansel's
`again.
`
`"In addition, the preservative must not
`interact with a container" --
` Do you see that?
`A.
`I see those words on this page.
`Q.
`-- "such as a metal ointment tube or a
`plastic medication bottle or with an enclosure,
`such as a rubber or plastic cap or liner."
`
`8 (Pages 26 to 29)
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2065
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685
`Page 8
`
`

`

`Page 30
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
` Do you see that?
`A.
`I see those words on the page, but --
`Q.
`I'm not -- that's all --
`A.
`-- I would need to understand --
`Q. Ma'am --
`A.
`-- and I may have other --
`Q. Ma'am -- ma'am -- ma'am --
`A.
`I need to be able to answer my
`question -- your question.
`Q. My question was -- my only question to
`you was do you see it. That was my only question
`to you. You either see it or you don't.
`A. No, there are further details I would
`like to include in my questions [sic], and I would
`like to be able to finish --
`Q. That's -- no, we're not doing this
`today. I'm going to ask you a yes-or-no question.
`My question is, do you see it?
` Do you see it or do you not see it?
`A.
`I see words on the page.
`Q. Thank you.
`And a POSA would see those words on the
`page; correct?
`A. And a POSA knows to read words on the
`
`Page 32
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`
`order to --
`Q.
`I'm not asking you for the context of
`the document, ma'am. I'm just asking you a
`question.
` Do you agree or disagree with the
`proposition -- forget where it comes from -- that
`appropriate tests should be devised and conducted
`to prevent preservative interaction that leads to
`container decomposition and contamination?
` MR. FRESE: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: As a scientist, I know and
`choose not to determine whether I agree or
`disagree with any particular phrase or sentence if
`I don't understand the context in which that
`sentence or phrase appears.
`Q. Okay. Well, forget the context, ma'am.
`I'm just asking you a question.
` When you are testing a formulation, when
`you are testing whether or not a preservative
`works, is part of the testing whether or not the
`preservative decomposes the container in which it
`is in?
`A. You're asking me whether we're concerned
`whether the preservative is going to decompose the
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 31
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`page in context with the rest of the words in the
`document --
`Q. Fair enough.
`A.
`-- and interpret those words as they
`know -- based on their knowledge as a POSA.
`Q. Fair enough. Let's give you some more
`context.
` "Such an interaction could result in
`decomposition of the preservative or the container
`closure or both causing decomposition and
`contamination."
` Do you see that?
`A.
`I see those words on the page.
`Q. "Appropriate tests should be devised and
`conducted to prevent this type of preservative
`interaction."
` Do you see that?
`A.
`I see those words on the page.
`Q. Okay. Do you believe that appropriate
`tests should be devised and conducted to prevent
`preservative interaction that causes decomposition
`and contamination?
`A.
`I have no opinion on that right now. I
`would need to read the context of this document in
`
`Page 33
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`
`container?
`Q. Yeah.
`A. Well, if there was a concern for that or
`an indication that that might occur, further
`testing to look at that would be conducted.
`Q. Okay. Thank you.
`Now, when you begin a nasal formulation
`product, do you first identify the potential dose
`of the formulation or the concentration of the
`active ingredient?
` MR. FRESE: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: During the formulation
`development process, it's typical that formulators
`either by -- either themselves or as a group of
`individuals identify what we typically now call
`the target product profile. And it has a number
`of the characteristics of the desired formulations
`identified. The formulator works towards meeting
`those identified goals.
` If during the development process it
`becomes apparent that a goal is unlikely to be
`met, then the target product profile is frequently
`redefined.
`Q. Okay. That's a really good answer, but
`
`9 (Pages 30 to 33)
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`Opiant Exhibit 2065
`Nalox-1 Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`IPR2019-00685
`Page 9
`
`

`

`Page 34
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`not to my question.
` My question was, when you begin a nasal
`formulation project, when you're thinking about
`the formulation, do you first think about what
`dose, or do you first think about what
`concentration of the active ingredient you need in
`the formulation?
` MR. FRESE: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: It depends on what's known
`about the particular agent, and there isn't one or
`the other of those that's always determined first.
`Q. Okay. Well, what do you mean by "It
`depends on what is known about the [active
`ingredient]"?
`A.
`It depends what's known about the active
`ingredient and how the choice of administration is
`going to determine how we present it in a dosage
`form to a patient.
`Q. Okay. Let's say it's an intranasal
`formulation, intranasal preparation.
`A. Okay.
`Q. When you're thinking about an intranasal
`formulation for a drug, do you start with trying
`to figure out what the dose of the drug should be,
`
`Page 36
`
`M. DONOVAN, PH.D.
`target product profile, there would be things that
`would be -- additional things that would need to
`be known, things like the solubility of the drug
`compound itself, something

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket