throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
` Paper 31
`Date: November 29, 2021
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioner,1
`v.
`FIRSTFACE CO., LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2019-00612 (Patent 8,831,557 B2)
`IPR2019-00613 and IPR2019-01011 (Patent 9,633,373 B2)
`IPR2019-00614 and IPR2019-01012 (Patent 9,779,419 B2)2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before MELISSA A. HAAPALA, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge,
`and JUSTIN T. ARBES and RUSSELL E. CASS, Administrative Patent
`Judges.
`ARBES, Administrative Patent Judge.
`ORDER
`Granting Petitioner’s Motions to Expunge
`37 C.F.R. § 42.56
`
`
`1 Apple Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics
`America, Inc. are the petitioners in Case IPR2019-00612. Apple Inc. is the
`petitioner in Cases IPR2019-00613, IPR2016-00614, IPR2019-01011, and
`IPR2019-01012. We refer herein to the petitioner in each respective
`proceeding as “Petitioner.”
`2 Case IPR2019-01011 was consolidated with Case IPR2019-00613 and
`Case IPR2019-01012 was consolidated with Case IPR2019-00614. This
`Order addresses issues pertaining to all of the listed cases. Therefore, we
`exercise our discretion to issue a single Order to be filed in each case. The
`parties are not authorized to use this style heading.
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00612 (Patent 8,831,557 B2)
`IPR2019-00613 and IPR2019-01011 (Patent 9,633,373 B2)
`IPR2019-00614 and IPR2019-01012 (Patent 9,779,419 B2)
`
`
`In each of the instant proceedings, we granted Petitioner’s motion to
`seal certain exhibits and entered Petitioner’s proposed protective order, and
`did not refer to any sealed material in the Final Written Decision. See
`IPR2019-00612, Papers 10, 26; IPR2019-00613, Papers 9, 27;
`IPR2019-00614, Papers 9, 27; IPR2019-01011, Papers 8, 10;
`IPR2019-01012, Papers 8, 10. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
`Circuit subsequently affirmed the Final Written Decisions and issued the
`mandate in each appeal. See Firstface Co., Ltd. v. Apple Inc., 859 F. App’x
`579 (Fed. Cir. 2021); Apple Inc. v. Firstface Co., Ltd., Nos. 2021-1001,
`2021-1002, 2021 WL 4156323 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 13, 2021).
`Petitioner filed a motion to expunge the sealed material. See
`IPR2019-00612, Paper 29 (“Mot.”); IPR2019-00613, Paper 30 (also
`referring in the case caption to consolidated Case IPR2019-01011);
`IPR2019-00614, Paper 30 (also referring in the case caption to consolidated
`Case IPR2019-01012). Petitioner states that Patent Owner does not oppose
`the motions. Mot. 4.
`“[A]fter final judgment in a trial, a party may file a motion to expunge
`confidential information from the record.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.56. “The rule
`balances the needs of the parties to submit confidential information with the
`public interest in maintaining a complete and understandable file history for
`public notice purposes” and “encourages parties to redact sensitive
`information, where possible, rather than seeking to seal entire documents.”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board Consolidated Trial Practice Guide
`(Nov. 2019), 22, available at https://www.uspto.gov/
`TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00612 (Patent 8,831,557 B2)
`IPR2019-00613 and IPR2019-01011 (Patent 9,633,373 B2)
`IPR2019-00614 and IPR2019-01012 (Patent 9,779,419 B2)
`
`
`We are persuaded that expunging the sealed material is appropriate
`under the circumstances. We previously found that the redacted portions of
`the exhibits constituted confidential information and were narrowly tailored
`to only confidential information. E.g., IPR2019-00612, Paper 10, 5.
`Further, we did not cite or rely on any redacted material in the documents in
`rendering our Final Written Decisions. Accordingly, the record of the
`proceedings and Final Written Decisions remain understandable in the
`absence of the redacted material.
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s motions to expunge are granted, and the
`unredacted versions of the following exhibits (filed as “Board Only”) are
`expunged from the record of each respective proceeding:
`IPR2019-00612: Exhibits 1104 and 1131;
`IPR2019-00613: Exhibits 1004 and 1031;
`IPR2019-00614: Exhibits 1004 and 1031;
`IPR2019-01011: Exhibits 1004 and 1031; and
`IPR2019-01012: Exhibits 1004 and 1031.
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00612 (Patent 8,831,557 B2)
`IPR2019-00613 and IPR2019-01011 (Patent 9,633,373 B2)
`IPR2019-00614 and IPR2019-01012 (Patent 9,779,419 B2)
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Gabrielle E. Higgins
`Scott A. McKeown
`Christopher M. Bonny
`Victor Cheung
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`gabrielle.higgins@ropesgray.com
`scott.mckeown@ropesgray.com
`christopher.bonny@ropesgray.com
`victor.cheung@ropesgray.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Thomas C. Cecil
`Barry J. Bumgardner
`Matthew C. Juren
`NELSON BUMGARDNER ALBRITTON P.C.
`tom@nelbum.com
`barry@nelbum.com
`matthew@nelbum.com
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket