Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 57 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 5
`
`(cid:3)
`
`(cid:40)(cid:71)(cid:90)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:86)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:44)(cid:44)(cid:44)(cid:3)(cid:11)Admitted Pro Hac Vice(cid:12)(cid:3)
`(cid:55)(cid:72)(cid:91)(cid:68)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:82)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:26)(cid:28)(cid:26)(cid:20)(cid:23)(cid:21)(cid:3)
`(cid:38)(cid:75)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:42)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:42)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:11)Admitted Pro Hac Vice(cid:12)(cid:3)
`(cid:55)(cid:72)(cid:91)(cid:68)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:82)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:26)(cid:27)(cid:24)(cid:27)(cid:24)(cid:3)
`(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:35)(cid:81)(cid:69)(cid:68)(cid:73)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:80)(cid:17)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:3)
`(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:35)(cid:81)(cid:69)(cid:68)(cid:73)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:80)(cid:17)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:3)
`(cid:49)(cid:40)(cid:47)(cid:54)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:56)(cid:48)(cid:42)(cid:36)(cid:53)(cid:39)(cid:49)(cid:40)(cid:53)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:47)(cid:37)(cid:53)(cid:44)(cid:55)(cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:17)(cid:38)(cid:17)(cid:3)
`(cid:22)(cid:20)(cid:22)(cid:20)(cid:3)(cid:58)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:88)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:3)
`(cid:41)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:58)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:55)(cid:72)(cid:91)(cid:68)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:26)(cid:25)(cid:20)(cid:19)(cid:26)(cid:3)
`(cid:55)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:27)(cid:20)(cid:26)(cid:12)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:26)(cid:26)(cid:16)(cid:28)(cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:3)
`(cid:41)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:27)(cid:20)(cid:26)(cid:12)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:26)(cid:26)(cid:16)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:27)(cid:24)(cid:3)
`(cid:75)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:92)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:54)(cid:37)(cid:49)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:22)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:22)(cid:27)(cid:12)(cid:3)
`(cid:53)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:47)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:54)(cid:37)(cid:49)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:28)(cid:21)(cid:22)(cid:22)(cid:12)(cid:3)
`(cid:45)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:76)(cid:73)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:47)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:42)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:54)(cid:37)(cid:49)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:24)(cid:24)(cid:27)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:12)(cid:3)
`(cid:70)(cid:71)(cid:69)(cid:35)(cid:69)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:92)(cid:86)(cid:83)(cid:70)(cid:17)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:3)
`(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:79)(cid:35)(cid:69)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:92)(cid:86)(cid:83)(cid:70)(cid:17)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:3)
`(cid:77)(cid:79)(cid:74)(cid:35)(cid:69)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:92)(cid:86)(cid:83)(cid:70)(cid:17)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:3)
`(cid:37)(cid:36)(cid:49)(cid:60)(cid:54)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:17)(cid:38)(cid:17)(cid:3)
`(cid:20)(cid:19)(cid:22)(cid:19)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:88)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:3)
`(cid:54)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:3)(cid:28)(cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:24)(cid:23)(cid:3)
`(cid:55)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:25)(cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:12)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:19)(cid:27)(cid:16)(cid:27)(cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:24)(cid:3)
`(cid:41)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:25)(cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:12)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:24)(cid:22)(cid:16)(cid:21)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:3)
`(cid:87)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:92)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:73)(cid:73)(cid:3)
`(cid:41)(cid:44)(cid:53)(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:41)(cid:36)(cid:38)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:50)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:47)(cid:55)(cid:39)(cid:17)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)(cid:38)
`
`(cid:3)(cid:36)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:49)(cid:44)(cid:55)(cid:40)(cid:39)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:36)(cid:55)(cid:40)(cid:54)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:44)(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:53)(cid:44)(cid:38)(cid:55)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:50)(cid:56)(cid:53)(cid:55)(cid:3)
`(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:50)(cid:53)(cid:55)(cid:43)(cid:40)(cid:53)(cid:49)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:44)(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:53)(cid:44)(cid:38)(cid:55)(cid:3)(cid:50)(cid:41)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:47)(cid:44)(cid:41)(cid:50)(cid:53)(cid:49)(cid:44)(cid:36)(cid:3)
`(cid:3)
`(cid:3)
`(cid:36)(cid:54)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:50)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:29)(cid:20)(cid:27)(cid:16)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:16)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:16)(cid:45)(cid:39)(cid:3)
`(cid:50)(cid:44)(cid:49)(cid:55)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:47)(cid:36)(cid:44)(cid:48)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:53)(cid:56)(cid:38)(cid:55)(cid:44)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:49)(cid:39)(cid:3)
`(cid:51)(cid:53)(cid:40)(cid:43)(cid:40)(cid:36)(cid:53)(cid:44)(cid:49)(cid:42)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:36)(cid:55)(cid:40)(cid:48)(cid:40)(cid:49)(cid:55)(cid:3)
`(cid:88)(cid:71)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:43)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:45)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)(cid:38)
`
`(cid:3)(cid:45)
`
`(cid:3)(cid:45)
`
`(cid:3)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)
`(cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:54)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:50)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:29)(cid:20)(cid:27)(cid:16)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:16)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:24)(cid:16)(cid:45)(cid:39)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)(cid:41)
`
`(cid:3)
`
`(cid:44)(cid:53)(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:41)(cid:36)(cid:38)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:50)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:47)(cid:55)(cid:39)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:3)
`(cid:51)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:73)(cid:73)(cid:15)(cid:3)
`(cid:3)
`
`(cid:89)(cid:17)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:51)(cid:51)(cid:47)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:44)(cid:49)(cid:38)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:39)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:17)(cid:3)
`(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)(cid:36)
`
`(cid:3)
`
`(cid:45)(cid:50)(cid:44)(cid:49)(cid:55)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:47)(cid:36)(cid:44)(cid:48)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:53)(cid:56)(cid:38)(cid:55)(cid:44)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:3)(cid:9)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:53)(cid:40)(cid:43)(cid:40)(cid:36)(cid:53)(cid:44)(cid:49)(cid:42)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:36)(cid:55)(cid:40)(cid:48)(cid:40)(cid:49)(cid:55)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)
`
`(cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:54)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:50)(cid:54)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:29)(cid:20)(cid:27)(cid:16)(cid:38)(cid:57)(cid:16)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:16)(cid:45)(cid:39)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:29)(cid:20)(cid:27)(cid:16)(cid:38)(cid:57)(cid:16)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:24)(cid:16)(cid:45)(cid:39)(cid:3)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:41)(cid:44)(cid:53)(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:41)(cid:36)(cid:38)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:50)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:47)(cid:55)(cid:39)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:3)
`(cid:3)
`(cid:51)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:73)(cid:73)(cid:15)(cid:3)
`(cid:3)
`
`(cid:89)(cid:17)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)(cid:54)
`
`(cid:39)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:86)(cid:17)(cid:3)
`(cid:3)
`
`(cid:36)(cid:48)(cid:54)(cid:56)(cid:49)(cid:42)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:47)(cid:40)(cid:38)(cid:55)(cid:53)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:44)(cid:38)(cid:54)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:50)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:47)(cid:55)(cid:39)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3)
`(cid:54)(cid:36)(cid:48)(cid:54)(cid:56)(cid:49)(cid:42)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:47)(cid:40)(cid:38)(cid:55)(cid:53)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:44)(cid:38)(cid:54)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:48)(cid:40)(cid:53)(cid:44)(cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:44)(cid:49)(cid:38)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:3)
`(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)(cid:3)
`
`(cid:20) (cid:21) (cid:22) (cid:23) (cid:24) (cid:25) (cid:26) (cid:27) (cid:28)
`
`(cid:20)(cid:19)
`(cid:20)(cid:20)
`(cid:20)(cid:21)
`(cid:20)(cid:22)
`(cid:20)(cid:23)
`(cid:20)(cid:24)
`(cid:20)(cid:25)
`(cid:20)(cid:26)
`(cid:20)(cid:27)
`(cid:20)(cid:28)
`(cid:21)(cid:19)
`(cid:21)(cid:20)
`(cid:21)(cid:21)
`(cid:21)(cid:22)
`(cid:21)(cid:23)
`(cid:21)(cid:24)
`(cid:21)(cid:25)
`(cid:21)(cid:26)
`(cid:21)(cid:27)
`
`(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)
`
`Apple Ex. 1035
`Apple Inc. v. Firstface Co., Ltd.
`IPR2019-00614
`Page 00001
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 57 Filed 01/11/19 Page 2 of 5
`
` 
` 
`
`Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 4-3, Plaintiff Firstface Co., Ltd. (“Firstface”), Defendants Samsung
`Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”), and Defendant
`Apple Inc. (“Apple”) file this Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement for U.S. Patent No.
`8,831,557, U.S. Patent No. 9,633,373, and U.S. Patent No. 9,779,419.1
`I.
`Construction of Terms on Which the Parties Agree [Patent L.R. 4-3(a)]
`The parties have conferred but have not agreed on the constructions for any terms. The parties
`will notify the Court if they reach any agreement(s) after the date of this filing.
`II.
`Each Party’s Proposed Construction of Each Disputed Term [Patent L.R. 4-3(b)]
`Exhibit A to this Joint Statement provides an identification of the terms, phrases, and clauses of
`the ’557 patent, ’373 patent, and ’419 patent upon which the parties do not agree, each party’s proposed
`constructions, the identification of intrinsic evidence that supports each party’s proposed constructions,
`and the identification of any extrinsic evidence known to each party upon which it intends to rely, either
`to support its proposed construction(s), or to oppose any other party’s proposed construction(s),
`including, but not limited to, as permitted by law, dictionary definitions, citations to learned treatises and
`prior art, and testimony of percipient and expert witnesses, in accordance with Patent L.R. 4-3(b). To
`the extent a party cites intrinsic or extrinsic evidence in support of its proposed construction for a
`disputed claim term, the other parties may also rely on the same intrinsic or extrinsic evidence for that
`disputed claim term.
`III. Most Significant and Dispositive Terms [Patent L.R. 4-3(c)]
`In accordance with the Court’s Standing Order for Claim Construction in Patent Cases Before
`Judge James Donato, the parties have already narrowed the number of disputed terms, phrases, and
`clauses to less than ten. The parties propose briefing nine groups of disputed terms, some of which are
`unique to Firstface and Apple given the two additional patents asserted against Apple. The parties
`believe that all of these terms are significant to resolving the cases against Apple and Samsung.
`
`                                                            
`1 The ’557 patent is asserted against Apple and Samsung. The ’373 patent and ’419 patent are asserted
`only against Apple. The ’557 patent, ’373 patent, and ’419 patent are attached as Exhibits B, C, and D,
`respectively.
`
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION & PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`2
`
`CASE NOS: 3:18-CV-02243-JD, 3:18-CV-02245-JD
`
` 
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00614 Page 00002
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 57 Filed 01/11/19 Page 3 of 5
`
` 
` 
`
`IV. Claim Construction Briefing
`The parties understand that the Court’s Standing Order for Claim Construction allows them to
`file 20-page opening and opposition briefs and a 10-page reply brief in each case. In order to streamline
`the briefing and facilitate the Court’s review, the parties propose a slight modification to the Court’s
`order. Instead of submitting 100 total pages of briefing, the parties propose submitting a total of 75
`pages of joint briefing (30-page opening and opposition briefs and a 15-page reply brief). The parties
`propose that Firstface file a single 30-page opening brief and a single 15-page reply brief addressing all
`claim terms, and Apple and Samsung jointly file a 30-page opposition brief in which they jointly address
`any terms disputed in both cases and separately address any additional disputed terms unique to that
`defendant. The parties are filing a stipulated request to joint briefing.
`V.
`Length of Time for Claim Construction Hearing [Patent L.R. 4-3(d)]
`The tutorial is currently scheduled for April 18, 2019, at 11 a.m. The parties anticipate requiring
`no more than 45 minutes per side, and no more than 90 minutes total.
`The claim construction hearing is currently scheduled for May 2, 2019, at 11 a.m. The parties
`anticipate requiring no more than 90 minutes per side, and three hours total.
`VI. Witnesses To Be Called At Claim Construction Hearing [Patent L.R. 4-3(e)]
`Firstface does not expect to call any live witnesses during the claim construction hearing.
`Firstface may rely on declarations or deposition testimony from expert witnesses in its claim
`construction briefing. In particular, Mr. Nigel Jones may offer declaration or deposition testimony to
`explain the meaning of claim terms in the context of the subject matter disclosed in the patents-in-suit,
`describe the state of the technology related to the claimed inventions of the patents-in-suit, and explain
`how a person of ordinary skill would interpret claim terms at the time of the invention. Mr. Jones may
`also offer declaration or deposition testimony to rebut any of Defendants’ claim constructions.
`Apple does not expect to call any live witnesses during the claim construction hearing. Apple
`may rely on declarations or deposition testimony from Jason Nieh or George Edwards in its claim
`construction briefing. In particular, Mr. Nieh or Mr. Edwards may offer declaration or deposition
`testimony to explain the meaning of claim terms in the context of the subject matter disclosed in the
`
`
`
` 
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION & PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`3
`
`CASE NOS: 3:18-CV-02243-JD, 3:18-CV-02245-JD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00614 Page 00003
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 57 Filed 01/11/19 Page 4 of 5
`
` 
` 
`
`patents-in-suit, describe the state of the technology related to the claimed inventions of the patents-in-
`suit, and explain how a person of ordinary skill would interpret claim terms at the time of the invention.
`Samsung does not expect to call any live witnesses during the claim construction hearing.
`Samsung may rely on declarations or deposition testimony from Jason Nieh in its claim construction
`briefing. In particular, Dr. Nieh may offer declaration or deposition testimony to explain the meaning of
`claim terms in the context of the subject matter disclosed in the patents-in-suit, describe the state of the
`technology related to the claimed inventions of the patents-in-suit, and explain how a person of ordinary
`skill would interpret claim terms at the time of the invention. 
`VII. Requested Factual Findings [Patent L.R. 4-3(f)]
`The parties do not request that the Court make any factual findings related to claim construction.
`Dated: January 11, 2019
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Edward R. Nelson III

`Edward R. Nelson III (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`Texas Bar No. 00797142
`Christopher G. Granaghan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`Texas Bar No. 24078585
`ed@nbafirm.com
`chris@nbafirm.com
`NELSON BUMGARDNER ALBRITTON P.C.
`3131 West Seventh Street, Suite 300
`Fort Worth, Texas 76107
`Telephone: (817) 377-9111
`Facsimile: (817) 377-3485
`
`Christopher D. Banys (SBN 230038)
`Richard C. Lin (SBN 209233)
`Jennifer L. Gilbert (SBN 255820)
`cdb@banyspc.com
`rcl@banyspc.com
`jlg@banyspc.com
`BANYS, P.C.
`1030 Duane Avenue
`Santa Clara, CA 95054
`Telephone: (650) 308-8505
`Facsimile: (650) 353-2202
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff FIRSTFACE CO., LTD.
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION & PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`4
`
`CASE NOS: 3:18-CV-02243-JD, 3:18-CV-02245-JD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00614 Page 00004
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 57 Filed 01/11/19 Page 5 of 5
`
` 
` 
`
`Dated: January 11, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Aaron Wainscoat
`MARK D. FOWLER
`AARON WAINSCOAT
`CLAYTON THOMPSON
`ERIK R. FUEHRER
`JONATHAN HICKS
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`2000 University Avenue
`East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214
`Telephone: 650.833.2000
`Facsimile: 650.833.2001
`
`Attorneys for Defendants SAMSUNG
`ELECTRONICS CO., LTD and SAMSUNG
`ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`
`By: /s/ Nathan B. Sabri
`NATHAN B. SABRI
`Attorneys for Defendants APPLE INC.
`
`
`Dated: January 11, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), Edward R. Nelson III attests that concurrence in the filing
`of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories listed above.
`
`
`/s/ Edward R. Nelson III

`Edward R. Nelson III
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION & PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`5
`
`CASE NOS: 3:18-CV-02243-JD, 3:18-CV-02245-JD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00614 Page 00005
`
`

`

`Samsung’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION: See the
`proposed construction for
`the term “activation button”
`
`
`Group/Term
`No.1
`
`1A
`
`Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 57-1 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 26
`Exhibit A to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`
`Firstface’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`
`Apple’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`
`Claim Language2
`
`“pressing [of] the activation button”
`/ “activation button has been
`pressed” / “an activation button for
`pressing” / “activation button
`configured for pressing”
`Found in claim numbers:
`’557 patent: 1, 9
`’373 patent: 1, 4, 10-12, 18
`’419 patent: 1-3, 7, 9, 10, 16
`
`
`
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION: plain
`and ordinary meaning; see
`construction of “activation
`button”
`
`DICTIONARY/TREATISE
`DEFINITIONS:
`button, McGraw-Hill
`Dictionary of Scientific and
`Technical Terms (2003), p.
`303
`button, Wiley Electrical &
`Electronics Engineering
`Dictionary (2004), p. 86
`
`INTRINSIC EVIDENCE:
`’557 patent at Abstract, Fig.
`1, 1:17-24, 1:34-48, 1:52-
`56, 2:1-28, 3:28-46, 3:51-
`53, 3:56-67, 4:6-5:30, 5:43-
`49, 10:1-20, 11:50-54
`’373 patent at Abstract, Fig.
`1, 1:15-22, 1:34-48, 1:53-
`2:17, 3:21-40, 3:45-47,
`
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION:
`“moving the activation
`button in response to
`pressure” / “activation
`button has been moved in
`response to pressure” / “an
`activation button for
`moving in response to
`pressure” / “activation
`button configured for
`moving in response to
`pressure”
`See construction for
`activation button
`
`DICTIONARY/TREATISE
`DEFINITIONS:
`button, Microsoft
`Computer Dictionary
`(2002), p. 79
`button, A Dictionary of
`Information Technology
`and Computer Science,
`second edition, Tony
`Gunton (1993), p. 31
`
`
`1 Terms in the same group number present identical issues and will be briefed together.
`2 U.S. Patent No. 8,831,557 is asserted against Apple and Samsung. U.S. Patent No. 9,633,373 and U.S. Patent No. 9,779,419 are
`asserted only against Apple.
`
`
`
`1
`
`IPR2019-00614 Page 00006
`
`

`

`Samsung’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`
`Group/Term
`No.1
`
`Claim Language2
`
`Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 57-1 Filed 01/11/19 Page 2 of 26
`Exhibit A to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`
`Firstface’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`3:49-60, 4:1-5:38, 5:51-57,
`10:11-30, 11:61-65
`’419 patent at Abstract, Fig.
`1, 1:15-22, 1:34-48, 1:53-
`2:17, 3:21-40, 3:45-47,
`3:49-60, 4:1-5:38, 5:51-57,
`10:11-30, 11:61-65
`’557 Patent Prosecution
`History at January 7, 2014
`Response to Office Action
`7-11; June 26, 2014
`Response to Office Action
`at 8-9
`EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE:
`Firstface may rely on expert
`testimony from Nigel Jones.
`Mr. Jones may testify as to
`the meaning of the claim
`terms in the context of the
`subject matter of the
`patents-in-suit, the state of
`the technology related to the
`claimed inventions of the
`patents-in-suit, and how a
`person of ordinary skill
`would interpret these claim
`terms at the time of the
`invention. Mr. Jones may
`also testify to rebut
`Defendants’ claim
`constructions.
`
`Apple’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`press, American Heritage
`Dictionary (2006), p. 1389
`press, Concise Oxford
`American Dictionary
`(2006), pp.699-700
`press, Merriam-Webster’s
`Collegiate Dictionary
`(2003), p. 983
`
`INTRINSIC EVIDENCE:
`’557 patent at Abstract,
`1:18-24, 1:34-44, 1:52-56,
`2:1-28, 3:48-5:30, 5:39-59,
`6:7-13, 6:44-7:3, 7:5-7, 7:8-
`12, 7:14-16, 7:17-19, 7:51-
`64, 7:65-8:2, 8:3-9, 8:11-
`64, 9:11-23, 9:25-32, 9:59-
`67, 10:64-11:3, 11:50-54,
`Figs. 1-2
`’419 patent at Abstract,
`1:18-24, 1:34-44, 1:53-
`2:17, 3:42-5:38, 5:47-59,
`6:16-22, 6:53-7:13, 7:15-
`17, 7:18-22, 7:23-25, 7:26-
`28, 7:60-8:6, 8:7-12, 8:13-
`20, 8:22-9:7, 9:22-33, 9:35-
`42, 10:2-10, 11:7-13,
`11:61-65, Figs. 1-2
`’373 patent at Abstract,
`1:18-24, 1:34-44, 1:53-
`2:17, 3:42-5:38, 5:47-59,
`
`
`
`2
`
`IPR2019-00614 Page 00007
`
`

`

`Group/Term
`No.1
`
`Claim Language2
`
`Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 57-1 Filed 01/11/19 Page 3 of 26
`Exhibit A to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`
`Firstface’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Samsung’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`
`Apple’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`6:16-22, 6:53-7:13, 7:15-
`17, 7:18-22, 7:23-25, 7:26-
`28, 7:60-8:6, 8:7-12, 8:13-
`20, 8:22-9:7, 9:22-33, 9:35-
`42, 10:2-10, 11:7-13,
`11:61-65, Figs. 1-2
`ʼ373 Patent Prosecution
`History at Sep. 9, 2015
`Claims, pp. 2-6; May 2,
`2016 Claims, pp. 2-7
`EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE:
`Apple may rely on expert
`testimony from Jason Nieh
`and/or George Edwards.
`Mr. Nieh and/or Mr.
`Edwards will testify as to
`the meaning of this claim
`term to one of ordinary
`skill in the art and the
`accuracy of Apple’s
`proposed construction
`based on the claim
`language, specification, file
`history, prior art references,
`extrinsic evidence, and
`industry knowledge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`IPR2019-00614 Page 00008
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 57-1 Filed 01/11/19 Page 4 of 26
`Exhibit A to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`
`Firstface’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`
`Apple’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`
`Claim Language2
`
`Group/Term
`No.1
`
`Samsung’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`
`1B
`
`“activation button”
`Found in claim numbers:
`’557 patent: 1, 8, 9, 15
`ʼ373 patent: 1, 4, 10, 11, 12, 18
`ʼ419 patent: 1, 2, 3, 7, 9, 10, 16
`
`
`
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION: “button
`that, while the device is on,
`switches the display from a
`state in which the display is
`turned off to a state in which
`the display is turned on”
`
`DICTIONARY/TREATISE
`DEFINITIONS:
`button, McGraw-Hill
`Dictionary of Scientific and
`Technical Terms (2003), p.
`303
`button, Wiley Electrical &
`Electronics Engineering
`Dictionary (2004), p. 86
`
`INTRINSIC EVIDENCE:
`’557 patent at Abstract, Fig.
`1, 1:17-24, 1:34-48, 1:52-
`56, 2:1-28, 3:28-46, 3:51-
`53, 3:56-67, 4:6-5:30, 5:43-
`49, 10:1-20, 11:50-54
`’373 patent at Abstract, Fig.
`1, 1:15-22, 1:34-48, 1:53-
`2:17, 3:21-40, 3:45-47,
`
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION:
`“movable piece that is
`depressed for switching the
`mobile communication
`terminal from the inactive
`state to the active state”
`
`DICTIONARY/TREATISE
`DEFINITIONS:
`activate, Oxford English
`Reference Dictionary
`(2003), p. 13
`activate, Concise Oxford
`American Dictionary
`(2006), p. 9
`button, Microsoft
`Computer Dictionary
`(2002), p. 79
`button, A Dictionary of
`Information Technology
`and Computer Science,
`second edition, Tony
`Gunton (1993), p. 31
`
`INTRINSIC EVIDENCE:
`
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION:
`“depressible component that
`activates”
`
`DICTIONARY/TREATISE
`DEFINITIONS:
`button, Microsoft Computer
`Dictionary 79 (5th Ed.
`2002)
`button, Dictionary of
`Information Technology
`and Computer Science 31
`(2nd Ed. 1993)
`INTRINSIC EVIDENCE:
`’557 patent specification at
`Abstract, 1:18-24, 1:34-44,
`1:52-56, 2:1-28, 3:51-5:30,
`5:39-59, 6:7-13, 6:44-7:3,
`7:5-19, 7:51-8:9, 8:11-64,
`9:11-23, 9:25-32,9:59-67,
`10:64-11:3, 11:50-54,
`12:41-14:29, Figs. 1, 2.
`’557 patent File History,
`Applicant Amendment
`(Aug. 12, 2014) at 1-4;
`Applicant Amendment
`
`
`
`4
`
`IPR2019-00614 Page 00009
`
`

`

`Group/Term
`No.1
`
`Claim Language2
`
`Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 57-1 Filed 01/11/19 Page 5 of 26
`Exhibit A to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`
`Firstface’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`3:49-60, 4:1-5:38, 5:51-57,
`10:11-30, 11:61-65
`’419 patent at Abstract, Fig.
`1, 1:15-22, 1:34-48, 1:53-
`2:17, 3:21-40, 3:45-47,
`3:49-60, 4:1-5:38, 5:51-57,
`10:11-30, 11:61-65
`’557 Patent Prosecution
`History at January 7, 2014
`Response to Office Action
`7-11; June 26, 2014
`Response to Office Action
`at 8-9
`
`EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE:
`Firstface may rely on expert
`testimony from Nigel Jones.
`Mr. Jones may testify as to
`the meaning of this claim
`term in the context of the
`subject matter of the
`patents-in-suit, the state of
`the technology related to the
`claimed inventions of the
`patents-in-suit, and how a
`person of ordinary skill
`would interpret this claim
`term at the time of the
`invention. Mr. Jones may
`also testify to rebut
`Defendants’ claim
`
`Apple’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`’557 patent at Abstract,
`1:18-24, 1:34-44, 1:52-56,
`2:1-28, 3:48-5:30, 5:39-59,
`6:7-13, 6:44-7:3, 7:5-7, 7:8-
`12, 7:14-16, 7:17-19, 7:51-
`64, 7:65-8:2, 8:3-9, 8:11-
`64, 9:11-23, 9:25-32, 9:59-
`67, 10:64-11:3, 11:50-54,
`Figs. 1-2
`’419 patent at Abstract,
`1:18-24, 1:34-44, 1:53-
`2:17, 3:42-5:38, 5:47-59,
`6:16-22, 6:53-7:13, 7:15-
`17, 7:18-22, 7:23-25, 7:26-
`28, 7:60-8:6, 8:7-12, 8:13-
`20, 8:22-9:7, 9:22-33, 9:35-
`42, 10:2-10, 11:7-13,
`11:61-65, Figs. 1-2
`’373 patent at Abstract,
`1:18-24, 1:34-44, 1:53-
`2:17, 3:42-5:38, 5:47-59,
`6:16-22, 6:53-7:13, 7:15-
`17, 7:18-22, 7:23-25, 7:26-
`28, 7:60-8:6, 8:7-12, 8:13-
`20, 8:22-9:7, 9:22-33, 9:35-
`42, 10:2-10, 11:7-13,
`11:61-65, Figs. 1-2
`ʼ373 Patent Prosecution
`History at Sep. 9, 2015
`Claims, pp. 2-6; May 2,
`2016 Claims, pp. 2-7
`
`
`Samsung’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`(June 26, 2014) at 1-15;
`Applicant Amendment (Jan.
`7, 2014) at 1-14.
`Firstface’s Infringement
`Contentions, Ex. A.
`EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE:
`Samsung may rely on
`expert testimony from Dr.
`Jason Nieh. Dr. Nieh will
`testify as to the meaning of
`this term to one of ordinary
`skill in the art and the
`accuracy of Samsung’s
`proposed construction based
`on the claim language,
`specification, file history,
`prior art references,
`extrinsic evidence, and
`industry knowledge. Dr.
`Nieh may testify as to how
`a POSITA at the time of the
`alleged invention would
`understand the term
`“pressing the activation
`button” and “an activation
`button has been pressed.”
`Dr. Nieh’s testimony may
`include, but is not limited
`to, the following:
`1. How a POSITA at the
`time of the alleged
`invention would read the
`
`
`
`5
`
`IPR2019-00614 Page 00010
`
`

`

`Group/Term
`No.1
`
`Claim Language2
`
`Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 57-1 Filed 01/11/19 Page 6 of 26
`Exhibit A to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`
`Firstface’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`constructions.
`
`Apple’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE:
`Apple may rely on expert
`testimony from Jason Nieh
`and/or George Edwards.
`Mr. Nieh and/or Mr.
`Edwards will testify as to
`the meaning of this claim
`term to one of ordinary
`skill in the art and the
`accuracy of Apple’s
`proposed construction
`based on the claim
`language, specification, file
`history, prior art references,
`extrinsic evidence, and
`industry knowledge.
`
`Samsung’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`specification of the asserted
`patent as supporting
`Samsung’s construction for
`this term;
`2. The meaning of the term
`“button” in the context of
`“activation” and
`surrounding claim language
`according to a POSITA at
`the time of the alleged
`invention; and
`3. Intrinsic and extrinsic
`evidence that supports
`Samsung’s proposed
`construction and rebuts
`Firstface’s proposed
`construction for this term,
`to the extent Firstface’s
`proposed construction
`substantively differs from
`Samsung’s proposed
`construction.
`
`2
`
`“an OFF state of the display unit”
`Found in claim numbers:
`’557 patent: 1, 9
`
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION: “a state
`in which the display is
`turned off yet the device
`itself is on”
`
`INTRINSIC EVIDENCE:
`’557 patent at Abstract, Fig.
`
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION: “state
`in which the display is not
`receiving power”
`
`DICTIONARY/TREATISE
`DEFINITIONS:
`off, Wiley Electrical and
`
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION: “a state
`in which the display unit is
`not receiving power”
`
`DICTIONARY/TREATISE
`DEFINITIONS:
`state, Microsoft Computer
`
`
`
`6
`
`IPR2019-00614 Page 00011
`
`

`

`Group/Term
`No.1
`
`Claim Language2
`
`Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 57-1 Filed 01/11/19 Page 7 of 26
`Exhibit A to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`
`Firstface’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`1, 1:17-24, 1:34-48, 1:52-
`56, 2:1-28, 3:28-46, 3:51-
`53, 3:56-67, 4:6-50, 5:43-
`49, 10:1-20, 11:50-54, claim
`1, claim 9
`’373 patent at Abstract, Fig.
`1, 1:15-22, 1:34-48, 1:53-
`2:17, 3:21-40, 3:45-47,
`3:49-60, 4:1-57, 5:51-57,
`10:11-30, 11:61-65, claim
`11
`’419 patent at Abstract,
`1:15-22, 1:34-48, 1:53-2:17,
`3:21-40, 3:45-47, 3:49-60,
`4:1-57, 5:51-57, 10:11-30,
`11:61-65, claim 10
`’557 Patent Prosecution
`History at January 7, 2014
`Response to Office Action
`7-11; June 26, 2014
`Response to Office Action
`at 8-9
`
`EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE:
`Firstface may rely on expert
`testimony from Nigel Jones.
`Mr. Jones may testify as to
`the meaning of this claim
`term in the context of the
`subject matter of the
`patents-in-suit, the state of
`
`Apple’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`Electronics Engineering
`Dictionary (2004), p. 524
`state, Microsoft Computer
`Dictionary (2002), pp. 497-
`498
`
`INTRINSIC EVIDENCE:
`’557 patent at Abstract,
`1:34-40, 2:1-28, 3:28-38,
`3:39-46, 4:3-26, 4:32-39,
`5:7-30
`’373 patent at Abstract,
`1:34-40, 1:53-2:17, 3:21-
`31, 3:32-40, 3:64-4:21,
`4:27-35, 5:14-38
`’419 patent at Abstract,
`1:34-40, 1:53-2:17, 3:21-
`31, 3:32-40, 3:64-4:21,
`4:27-35, 5:14-38
`ʼ557 Patent Prosecution
`History at Jan, 7, 2014
`Applicant
`Argument/Remarks Made
`in an Amendment, at pp. 1-
`14; June 26, 2014
`Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made
`in an Amendment, pp. 1-15
`
`
`Samsung’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`Dictionary 497 (5th Ed.
`2002)
`status, Microsoft Computer
`Dictionary 498 (5th Ed.
`2002)
`INTRINSIC EVIDENCE:
`’557 patent specification at
`Abstract, 2:1-28, 3:28-46,
`4:3-26, 12:41-53, 13:20-30
`EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE:
`Samsung may rely on
`expert testimony from Dr.
`Jason Nieh. Dr. Nieh will
`testify as to the meaning of
`this term to one of ordinary
`skill in the art and the
`accuracy of Samsung’s
`proposed construction based
`on the claim language,
`specification, file history,
`prior art references,
`extrinsic evidence, and
`industry knowledge.
`Dr. Nieh may testify as to
`how a person of ordinary
`skill in the art (“POSITA”)
`at the time of the alleged
`invention would understand
`the term “an OFF state of
`the display unit.” Dr. Nieh’s
`testimony may include, but
`
`
`
`7
`
`IPR2019-00614 Page 00012
`
`

`

`Group/Term
`No.1
`
`Claim Language2
`
`Case 3:18-cv-02245-JD Document 57-1 Filed 01/11/19 Page 8 of 26
`Exhibit A to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`
`Firstface’s Proposed
`Construction and
`Evidence in Support
`the technology related to the
`claimed inventions of the
`patents-in-suit, and how a
`person of ordinary skill
`would interpret this claim
`term at the time of the
`invention.