`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 31
`Entered: July 29, 2020
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`AMERICAN MULTI-CINEMA, INC.; AMC ENTERTAINMENT
`HOLDINGS, INC.; BOSTON MARKET CORPORATION; MOBO
`SYSTEMS, INC.; MCDONALD’S CORPORATION; MCDONALD’S
`USA; PANDA RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; PANDA EXPRESS INC.;
`PAPA JOHN’S INTERNATIONAL, INC.; STAR PAPA LP; and
`PAPA JOHN’S USA, INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FALL LINE PATENTS, LLC
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2019-00610
`Patent 9,454,748 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before MICHELLE N. WORMMEESTER, SHEILA F. McSHANE, and
`JOHN R. KENNY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KENNY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`Via email on July 27, 2020, Petitioner requested a teleconference to
`seek authorization to move to strike Section II.B. of Patent Owner’s
`responsive supplemental claim construction brief (Paper 30) for exceeding
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00610
`Patent 9,454,748 B2
`
`the scope of authorized briefing. Ex. 3003. The Board, however, can
`discern whether Section II.B. exceeds the proper scope of briefing and
`disregard the section if it does. See Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`Consolidated Trial Practice Guide 80 (Nov. 2019). Thus, we do not
`authorize the requested motion to strike and, therefore, the requested
`teleconference is not necessary.1
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`Tara D. Elliott
`Lisa K. Nguyen
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`tara.elliott@lw.com
`lisa.nguyen@lw.com
`
`Robert H. Reckers
`SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
`rreckers@shb.com
`
`Ricardo Bonilla
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`rbonilla@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`1If desired, Petitioner can still seek authorization of a motion to strike in a
`motion for rehearing of this Order.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00610
`Patent 9,454,748 B2
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Terry L. Watt
`FELLERS SNIDER, PC
`tlwatt@fellerssnider.com
`
`Matthew J. Antonelli
`Larry D. Thompson, Jr.
`ANTONELLI, HARRINGTON & THOMPSON LLP
`matt@ahtlawfirm.com
`larry@ahtlawfirm.com
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
