throbber
ARBUTUS - EXHIBIT 2009
`Moderna Therapeutics, Inc. v. Arbutus Biopharma Corporation
`IPR2019-00554
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 1 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 2 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`Fig.
`
`1b
`
`Ae
`oi.
`ee
`at
`Eeesetet)
`ns
`s
`prea
`F
`
`So
`
`a eae
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 3 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`
`rts
`esi
`
`
`ea8
`
`
`a
`
`Renatedat
`
`ae
`
` condensed DNA
`
`vesicle
`formation,
`extrusion
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 4 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`auiwiads©‘bis
`VNQGpuesawosodyuaamjeqBuruonnsed
`
`
`
`sawosod!|+¥WNd
`
`eucjeYNG
`
`(WU OOF ‘G'O) ALpiquny
`
`Zk18°09°0020
`
`
`
`
`
`(NW)UOoH}esj]UBDU0DsUuIWAdS
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 5 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`4
`
`aes 4‘a
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 6 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`Peaeeeeeed
`res
`
`eae
`
`Spryath
`brant es aaa
`
`ee eertee:
`
`Reneeeae
`Senate
`freeoae
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 7 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`6
`
`Fig
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 8 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`Fig. 7a
`
`ara
`
`iaoo)
`raeae
`
`aP
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`ey
`a eeIpenaoe
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 9 of 23
`
`i
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 10 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 11 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`Fig. 8a
`
`
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 12 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`Fig. 8b
`
`
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 13 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 14 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`6‘Bi4
`
`aIdNVS
`
`v0
`
`
`
`|€'0
`
`c0
`
`ae
`
`aduUaISaION]) d4Oy pe}as0s
`
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 15 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
` Cc
`
` b
`
`SAMPLE
`
`Fig.10
`
`Oo
`_-
`_—
`

`—
`‘
`
` m
`

`uw
`
`oO
`om
`

`-
`

`

`N
`
`vIUsINSSION J djHOg jewixeul %
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 16 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`SAMPLE
`
`Fig.11
`

`
`co
`
`t+
`
`N
`
`©o
`
`O
`_
`
`120
`
`edUs29S90N]j g4jH9a pejdass09 jewIXeW %
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 17 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 18 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 19 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`et“Big
`
`
`
`(spuodas)aus
`
`0S¢
`
`OO}
`
`0S
`
`OSE 00€
`
`00¢OSt
`
`-QO0001
`
`-00006
`
`-00008
`
`*00002
`
`-00009
`
`-0000S
`
`*QOOOP
`
`0000¢e
`
`-0000¢
`
`*OOOOL
`
`-0
`
`NBD fluorescence
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 20 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`Fig. 14A
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 21 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`Fig. ISA
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 15B
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 22 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`Fig. 164
`
`
`Fig. 16B
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 17, 2009
`
`Sheet 23 of 23
`
`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`1400
`
`4200
`
`1000
`
`RLU
`
`800
`
`600
`
`400
`
`200
`
`Fig. 17
`
`OControl
`OLiposomeswith LacZ
`
`fore leg
`
`hind leg
`
`fore thigh
`
`hind thigh
`
`

`

`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`1
`ENCAPSULATION OF BIOACTIVE
`COMPLEXES IN LIPOSOMES
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`This invention is directed to a methodfor the encapsulation
`of complexes, such as polycation-condensed nucleic acids, in
`liposomes, using an emulsion stabilized by amphipathic lip-
`ids as an intermediary within which the complex forms. This
`inventionis also directed to the liposome encapsulated com-
`plexes so formed. The methodof this invention is applicable
`for providing liposomes loaded with a variety of compounds
`which heretofore have been difficult to load into liposomesat
`high compoundto lipid ratios.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`In order to be useful as pharmaceutical preparations, bio-
`active agents must be able to reach the therapeutic site in an
`adequate therapeutic effective amount. While many bioactive
`agents and drugsarestable in vivo, others are often degraded.
`When such degradation occurs prior to the drug or bioactive
`agent reaching its target site, a non-therapeutic amount of
`drug will reach thetarget site. Other drugsor bioactive agents
`are taken up by non-target systems, once again resulting in the
`lack of a therapeutic amount of a drug or bioactive agent
`reaching the targetsite at therapeutically effective amounts.
`Certain polar drugs can not enter cells at all because of their
`inability to cross the target cell membrane. The only waythat
`these polar drugs may enter a cell is by uptake by the process
`of endocytosis, exposing them to degradative lysosomal
`enzymes in the cell. Yet another problem in the therapeutic
`delivery of drugsor bioactive agents is the inability to admin-
`ister a high enough concentration of the drug or bioactive
`agent to be therapeutic, while avoiding toxicities often asso-
`ciated with some drugsor bioactive agents. These problems
`have been approached by a number of different methods.
`When a drug or bioactive agent has no toxicity associated
`with it,
`it may be administered in high enough doses to
`account for degradation, removal by non-target organs and
`lack of targeting to the site where the therapeutic drug or
`bioactive agent is required. However, many drugsor bioactive
`agents are either too expensive to allow such waste or have
`toxicities that prevent administration of such high dosages.
`Numerous methods have been used to overcome some of the
`
`problems encountered in administering therapeutic amounts
`of drugs or bioactive agents.
`One such methodis the encapsulation of drugsor bioactive
`agents in liposomes. While somedrugs or bioactive agents
`can be encapsulated in liposomesat therapeutically effective
`doses by passive loading or by gradient loading, these meth-
`ods are limited either to drugs or bioactive agents with spe-
`cific chemical properties or to drugs or bioactive agents that
`can be administered in relatively low concentrations. Some
`bioactive compounds such as weak bases or weak acids can
`be loaded remotely into preformed liposomes to form highly
`concentrated complexes. This type of loading, referred to as
`remote or gradient loading, requires that the drug or bioactive
`agent be temporarily able to pass through the lipid bilayer of
`the liposome. However, this is not the case for all bioactive
`molecules, many of which cannotpass through the liposomal
`bilayer.
`Onearea in which attempts to administer therapeutic levels
`of drugs or bioactive agents have been only partially success-
`ful is the area of gene therapy. Gene therapy involves the
`introduction of an exogenous gene into an appropriate cell
`type, followed by enablementofthe gene’s expression within
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`the cell at therapeutically relevant levels. Such therapy has
`progressed, in a relatively short period of time, from basic
`research to the introduction into cells of a variety of genes,
`including those useful for treating cancers (Duqueetal.,
`Histol Histopathol, 13: 231-242 (1998); Runnebaumetal.,
`Anticancer Res., 17: 2887-2890 (1997)). While naked DNA,
`in some cases has been taken up into cells (Wolff et al.,
`Science, 247: 1465-1468 (1990)), it generally cannot be, due
`to its large size and high degree ofnegative charge; moreover,
`naked DNA cannotbe designedso asto be targeted to specific
`cells. Accordingly, successful gene therapy generally is reli-
`ant upon the availability of “vectors” for introducing DNA
`and other nucleic acids into cells.
`
`Presently, there are two major groups of DNA delivery
`systems, viral and non-viral. Viral vectors, including replica-
`tion-deficient viruses, such as retroviruses, adenoviruses, and
`adeno-associated viruses, have thus far been the most widely
`described gene delivery vehicles (Robbins et al., Trends in
`Biotech, 16: 3540 (1998)). However, their use has been ham-
`pered by the immunogenicity of their viral components,
`potential risk of reversion to a replication-competentstate,
`potential introduction of tumorgenic mutations, lack of tar-
`geting mechanisms, limitations in DNA capacity, difficulty in
`large scale production and other factors (see, e.g., Lee and
`Huang, J Biol Chem, 271: 8481-8487 (1996)).
`Two majortypes of nonviral vehicles have been developed
`as alternatives to viral vectors. Cationic liposome-DNA com-
`plexes (or “lipoplexes,” Feigner et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci
`USA, 84: 7413-7417 (1987)), consisting of cationic lipids and
`DNAhavethusfar been the most widely described alternative
`to viral vectors for gene delivery. However, such lipoplexes
`suffer from several major drawbacks when used in gene
`therapy, including low stability, high cytotoxicity, non-biode-
`gradability, poor condensation and protection of DNA, serum
`sensitivity, large size and lack oftissue specificity. Moreover,
`as the lipoplexesare positively charged, they generally inter-
`act nonspecifically with the negatively charged surfaces of
`mostcells; accordingly, it is generally not possible to target
`such lipoplexes to specific sites in vivo.
`Anothervariation of lipoplexes and DNA involves polyl-
`ysine-condensed DNA boundto anionic liposomes (Lee and
`Huang, J Biol Chem, 271: 8481-8487 (1996)). These require
`certain anionic lipids to form the active structure. The
`lipoplexes formed either do not completely encapsulate the
`DNA or must form two or more bilayers around the con-
`densed DNA. In the latter case delivery to the cytoplasm
`would require the DNA to cross at least three membranes.
`This would be expected to inhibit transfection efficiency. In
`the formercase, stability may be compromised by exposure
`of the DNAin physiological salt solutions.
`Liposomesare an additional type of nonviral vectoralter-
`native, and offer several advantages for such use in compari-
`son to the lipoplexes. For example, liposomal bilayers form
`around encapsulated nucleic acids, thereby protecting the
`nucleic acids from degradation by environmental nucleases;
`lipoplexes, by contrast, do not encapsulate nucleic acids, and
`hence, cannot completely sequester them away from environ-
`mental nucleases. Moreover, liposomes can encapsulate, in
`their aqueous compartments, other bioactive agents in addi-
`tion to nucleic acids; lipoplexes, by contrast, cannot because
`they do not encapsulate aqueous volume. Furthermore, lipo-
`somes can be made to be neutrally charged or anionic, as
`opposedto the restricted ionic nature of the aforementioned
`lipoplexes. Thus, liposomes can be designed so as to avoid
`cytotoxicities induced by the delivery vehicle itself and to
`enhancetheir accumulation at specific sites of interest.
`
`

`

`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`3
`While the concept of encapsulating bioactive agents in
`liposomes is not new, many agents have been difficult to
`encapsulate in liposomesat any level and others have proven
`difficult to encapsulate in liposomesat levels that would be
`therapeutically effective. Many small molecules can be
`encapsulated in liposomes but leak out. Thus,it has also been
`difficult to encapsulate some bioactive agents and have them
`retained within the liposomesat a therapeutically effective
`dose for a therapeutically effective time. For instance, it has
`been difficult to encapsulate particularly large molecules into
`a complex within a liposome. It has also been difficult to use
`many water soluble molecules as therapeutic agents because
`they are unable to penetrate the cell membrane. When encap-
`sulated stably into liposomesthat can fuse to cell membranes,
`it is possible to deliver these drugs at therapeutically effective
`doses into the target cells. The method ofthe present inven-
`tion enables formation of liposomescontaining such drugs or
`bioactive agents in a therapeutically useful form.
`Several attempts have been made to encapsulate nucleic
`acids in liposomes, these including use of the reverse-phase
`evaporation (Fraley et al., J Biol Chem, 255: 10431-10435
`(1980)), dehydration-rehydration (Alizo et al., JMicroencap,
`7: 497-503 (1990)) and freeze-thaw (Monnard et al., Biochem
`Biophys Acta, 1329: 39-50 (1997)) methodsof liposomefor-
`mation. However, each of these methods has several limita-
`tions, including requirements for low starting concentrations
`of nucleic acid, resulting in significant percentages of empty
`vesicles in the product liposomes, inability to reproducibly
`encapsulate sufficient quantity of DNA in liposomes to be
`therapeutically effective at the desiredtarget site and difficul-
`ties in optimizing the vehicles for protection of their encap-
`sulated nucleic acids from nuclease-mediated degradation.
`Attempts have also been made to complex DNA with com-
`plexing agents and subsequently encapsulate the complexed
`DNA in liposomes. Complexing agents are agents that react
`with other molecules causing the precipitation or condensa-
`tion of the molecules. Complexing agents useful in the prac-
`tice of the present invention are selected from the group
`consisting of charged molecules that have a charge opposite
`to the charge on the bioactive agent. The complexing agent
`may beselected from the group of charged molecules con-
`sisting of spermine, spermidine, hexammine cobalt, calctum
`ions, magnesium ions, polylysines, polyhistidines, prota-
`mines, polyanions such as heparin and dextran sulfate, citrate
`ions, or sulfate ions. For instance, polycations of charge +3 or
`higher, e.g., polyamines, polylysine and hexammine cobalt
`(IIT) are known(see Chattoraj et al., JMo/ Biol, 121: 327-337
`(1978); Gosule L C and Schellman J A. Nature 259: 333-335
`(1976); Vitello et al., Gene Therapy, 3: 396-404 (1996);
`Widom et al. J. Mol. Biol., 144: 431-453 (1980); Arscott et al.,
`Biopolymers, 30: 619-630 (1990); Wilsonet al., Biochem, 18:
`2192-2196 (1979)) to be able to condense DNA molecules,
`through interaction with multiple negative charges on the
`DNA.Polyamines, e.g., spermidine (3+) and spermine(4+),
`have, unlike other types of polycations, been found to occur
`naturally in all living cells (see, e.g., Ames and Dubin, J Biol
`Chem, 253: 769-775 (1960); Tabor and Tabor, Annu Rev
`Biochem, 53: 749-790 (1984)). High polyamine levels are
`knownto exist in actively proliferating animal cells, and are
`believed to be essential therein for maintaining normalcell
`growth (Amesand Dubin, JBiol Chem, 253: 769-775 (1960);
`Tabor and Tabor, Annu Rev Biochem, 53: 749-790 (1984);
`Hafneret al., J Biol Chem, 254: 12419-12426 (1979); Pegg,
`Biochem J, 234: 249-262 (1986)).
`Liposome encapsulation of spermine-condensed linear
`DNAin liposomeshas been attempted by Tikchonenkoetal.,
`Gene, 63: 321-330 (1988). However, the starting DNA con-
`
`4
`centration therein was low, with the consequence that the
`resulting liposomesalso had a low ratio of encapsulated DNA
`to liposomallipid (0.02-0.2 micrograms DNAper micromole
`lipid). Moreover, such condensation oflinear DNA molecules
`in the absence of intermolecular DNA aggregation required
`control over spermine concentrations to an impracticable
`degree of precision. Additionally, Baeza et al., Ori Life Evol
`Biosphere, 21: 225-252 (1992) and Ibanez et al., Biochem
`Cell Biol, 74: 633-643 (1996) both report encapsulation of
`1-4 microgramsper micromole of spermine-condensed SV40
`plasmid DNAin liposomes. However,neitherof their prepa-
`rations were dialyzed against high salt buffers subsequentto
`liposome formation, the reported amounts of encapsulated
`DNAactually may include a significant percentage of unen-
`capsulated DNA.Since these liposomal formulations were
`not exposed to DNAase degradation to determine the percent-
`age of DNA actually sequestered in the liposomes, the high
`reported amounts probably do notreflect actually encapsu-
`lated DNA.
`
`Efficient preparation and use of liposomal encapsulated
`nucleic acids requires the use of high-concentration suspen-
`sions of nucleic acids, in order to minimize the percentage of
`empty liposomesresulting from the process and to maximize
`the DNA:liposomallipid ratios. However, condensation of
`DNAat high concentrations during known methodsoflipo-
`some formation generally results in intermolecular aggrega-
`tion, leading to the formation ofnucleic acid-based structures
`unsuitable for gene delivery. Large aggregates formed by
`condensation of DNA directly with a complexing agent can-
`not be easily encapsulated in liposomeand such large aggre-
`gate structures (on the order of the size of cells) can not
`efficiently deliver materials to target cells. For instance, if the
`aggregates are larger than 500 nm,they are rapidly cleared
`from the circulation because of their size after intravenous
`administration. On the other hand, larger aggregates may be
`administered to cells in vitro. However, sometimesthe aggre-
`gates as too large too be taken up bycells.
`Thus, in order to deliver a variety of drugs in therapeuti-
`cally effective amounts into target cells, it was necessary to
`provide a method of making liposomesthat contain bioactive
`agents complexed so as to decrease their permeability
`through the lipid bilayer, while providing a methodthat also
`limits the size of the complex to be encapsulated in thelipo-
`some so that the resultant therapeutic product is in a thera-
`peutic size range.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`5
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`The present invention provides a method of encapsulating
`a bioactive complex in a liposome which comprises the steps
`of:
`
`55
`
`60
`
`(a) dissolving at least one amphipathiclipid in one or more
`organic solvents
`(b) combiningat least one aqueous suspension comprising
`a solution containing a first molecule selected from the
`group consisting of a bioactive agent and a complexing
`agent with the lipid-containing organic solution of step
`(a) so as to form an emulsion in the form of a reverse
`micelle comprising the first molecule andthe lipid;
`(c) adding a second aqueoussuspension comprising a sec-
`ond molecule selected from the group consisting of a
`bioactive agent and a complexing agent wherein if the
`first molecule is a bioactive agent, the second molecule
`is a complexing agent andvice versa, to the emulsion of
`step (b),
`(d) incubating the emulsion of step (c) to allow the com-
`plexing agent to contact the bioactive agent thereby
`
`

`

`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`5
`forming a complex ofthe bioactive agent with the com-
`plexing agent within lipid stabilized water droplets;
`wherein said complex is no greater in diameter than the
`diameter of the droplet and,
`(e) removing the organic solvent from the suspension of
`step (d), so as to form liposomes comprising the com-
`plexed bioactive agent andthe lipid.
`The methodofthe present invention 1s usefulfor the prepa-
`ration of therapeutically useful liposomes containing a wide
`range of bioactive molecules complexed with complexing
`agent within the liposome. Preferably, the liposomesare fuso-
`genic liposomes which by the methodofthe present invention
`can encapsulate a variety of molecules. These fusogeniclipo-
`somes are able to fuse with cell membranes and enable the
`
`delivery of bioactive agents in therapeutically effective
`amounts to cells and organs. In addition, the method of the
`present invention also allows morethan one bioactive agent to
`be encapsulated in a liposome. One or more bioactive agents
`may be encapsulated in the same liposomesat the same time
`by the method of the present invention. If more than one
`bioactive agent is encapsulated in a liposome by the method
`of the present invention, it is not necessary for each of the
`bioactive agents to be in the form of complexes.
`Somebioactive agents easily pass throughthelipid bilayer
`and therefore, are not stably sequestered in liposomes. By
`forming complexesofthe bioactive agents with a complexing
`agent, the bioactive agent remains in the liposomes. A major
`hurdle has been the problem of encapsulating complexed
`bioactive agents into liposomes. When the bioactive agent
`and complexing agent are mixed in solution prior to encap-
`sulation in liposomes, many complexes that are uncontrolla-
`bly large are formed at the concentrations necessary foreffi-
`cient loading of liposomes. The term bioactive complex is any
`bioactive agent bound to a complexing agent such that the
`complex thus formed results in a change in the physical
`properties such as decreasing the size of the bioactive mol-
`ecule, decreasing the solubility of the bioactive agent, pre-
`cipitating the bioactive agents, condensing the bioactive
`agent, or increasing the size of the complex. Liposomesthat
`fuse with cell membranesare able to deliver a vast category of
`molecules to the inside of cells. One advantage of the inven-
`tion is that, by forming the complexofthe bioactive agent in
`the reverse micelles, the formation of unsuitable large com-
`plexes incapable of being encapsulated in therapeutically
`useful liposomesis prevented.
`The formation of complexes comprising a bioactive com-
`pound within liposomes has the advantage that such com-
`plexes are less likely to leak out of the liposome before
`delivery to the desired target cell. Furthermore, the formation
`of a complex can concentrate a large amountof the bioactive
`agent within the liposome such that the ratio of bioactive
`agent-to-lipid is high and delivery is efficacious. The dis-
`closed method provides for complexation of bioactive mate-
`rials with complexing agents within an emulsion followed by
`encapsulation within a liposome in a manner that prevents the
`formation of extremely large, detrimental aggregates, greater
`than several microns, of the bioactive agent and complexing
`agent.
`In one embodiment, the method of the present invention
`has provided a method to encapsulate nucleic acid com-
`plexes. For instance, nucleic acids, such as DNA, are com-
`plexed with a condensing agent within reverse (inverted)
`micelles, followed by formation of liposomes from the
`micelles. While, as described above, previous attempts have
`been made to encapsulate DNA in liposomes, none of said
`methods were successfulat efficiently preparing therapeuti-
`cally useful liposomal DNA.
`
`me 5
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`This invention provides a method to prepare a liposome
`comprising a condensed nucleic acid, in amountsofat least
`about 0.5 microgramsnucleic acid per micromole ofliposo-
`mallipid.
`The liposomes’ lipid component preferably comprises a
`derivatized phospholipid and an additionallipid, generally in
`proportions of about 20-80 mole % derivatized phospholipid
`to about 80-20 mole % additional lipid. Preferred derivatized
`phospholipids include: phosphatidylethanolamine (PE)-bi-
`otin conjugates; N-acylated phosphatidylethanolamines
`(NAPEs), such as N-C12 DOPE; and, peptide-phosphatidyle-
`thanolamine conjugates, such as Ala-Ala-Pro-Val DOPE. The
`additional lipid can be anyofthe variety of lipids commonly
`incorporated into liposomes; however, where the derivatized
`phospholipid is a NAPE,the additional lipid is preferably a
`phosphatidylcholine (e.g., DOPC). Preferably, the nucleic
`acid is DNA.
`
`Also provided herein is a method to prepare a pharmaceu-
`tical composition comprising the liposome and a pharmaceu-
`tically acceptable carrier; said composition can be used to
`deliver the nucleic acid to the cells of an animal.
`
`Other and further objects, features and advantages will be
`apparent from the following description of the preferred
`embodiments of the invention given for the purpose ofdis-
`closure when taken in conjunction with the following draw-
`ings.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1. Micrographs of spermine-mediated plasmid DNA
`aggregation (200 micrograms plasmid DNA in 125 microli-
`ters LSB was mixed gently with 7 mM spermine in 125
`microliters LSB). (A) Light microscope observation after 15
`minutes incubation at room temperature (bar represents 10
`microns). (B) Cryo TEM observation (bar represents 100
`nm).
`FIG. 2. Schematic representation of method of DNA
`encapsulation. Condensation of DNA occurs(I) within phos-
`pholipid-stabilized water droplets that have formed around
`the DNA in a bulk organic solvent. Separate spermine-con-
`taining droplets transfer (II) spermine into the DNA contain-
`ing droplets by transient (III) contact and exchange. After
`condensation within the emulsion (IV), vesicles are formed
`by solvent evaporation and further extruded to smaller sizes
`(V).
`FIG. 3. Effect of liposomal N-C12 DOPE on spermine-
`mediated aggregation of plasmid DNA.Equilibrium dialysis
`was performed in a three-chamber dialysis device (see
`Example 4). The curve on theleft is from dialyses without
`liposomes, while the curve shifted to the right is from dialyses
`that included a chamber with liposomes. X-axis: spermine
`concentration (mM); y-axis: turbidity (O.D. 400 nm).
`FIG.4. Agarose gel analysis of plasmid DNAprotection in
`N-C12 DOPE/DOPC(70:30) formulations—analiquot from
`each preparation after is extrusion and dialysis was divided,
`and one part digested with DNase I (see Example 9). Lane 1.
`Preparation without spermine. Lane 2. Sameas lane 1 but
`digested with DNase I. Lane 3. Preparation with spermine.
`Lane 4. Sameaslane 3, but digested with DNaseI.
`FIG. 5. Light micrographsofthe particles in N-C12 DOPE/
`DOPC (70:30) sample prepared as described in Example 3
`with pZeoLacZ plasmid and spermine (A) versus polystyrene
`beads with an average diameter of 269+7 nm (B) (bars rep-
`resent 10 nm).
`FIG.6. Freeze-fracture TEM micrographs (see Example 7)
`of N-C12 DOPE/DOPC(70:30) samples prepared with plas-
`
`

`

`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`7
`midand spermine,as described in Example 3. Arrow points to
`the particle with apparently encapsulated material (bar rep-
`resents 400 nm).
`FIG. 7. Cryo TEM micrographs (see Example 8) of lipo-
`somes with N-C12 DOPE/DOPCand the pZeoLacZ plasmid
`without spermine (a), or with spermine(b), said liposomes
`being prepared as described in Example 3. In (a) fiber-like
`structures are seen outside (star) and apparently inside (ar-
`row) liposomes. In (b), an arrow points to a toroid that
`resembles polycation condensed plasmid DNA (bars in (a)
`and (b) represent 100 nm). Photomicrograph(c) represents an
`EPC sample made with spermine. Toroid (arrow) and bent rod
`(star) structures are compared with multilamellar liposomes
`(poundsign) [bar represents 50 nm].
`FIG. 8. Fluorescence photomicrographs of confluent
`OVCAR3cells after transfection (see Example 11) with the
`N-C12 DOPE/DOPC (70:30) preparations. Liposomal
`samples were prepared (see Example 3) with pEGFP-C1
`plasmid DNA (a) with spermineor (b) without spermine; a
`sample (c) of empty N-C12 DOPE/DOPC(70:30) liposomes
`without spermineplus free pEGFP-C1 plasmid DNA added
`outside the preformed liposomeswasalso tested. The amount
`of plasmid DNA addedto the empty liposomes in sample c
`was equal to the total amount in each of the other prepara-
`tions. Equal liposome concentrations were usedin the experi-
`ments.
`
`FIG. 9. Quantitation of EGFP expression in OVCAR 3
`cells transfected with pEGFP-C1, as measured by the EGFP
`fluorescence level. Transfection experiments(a, b and c, see
`Example 11) were the sameas in the previousfigure legend.
`In addition, formulations tested were: d) egg PC liposomes
`prepared with spermine and pEGFP-Cl plasmid (see
`Example 3); and, e) no additions. The cells were washed and
`labeled with CBAM,andthen dissolved in detergent to mea-
`sure the fluorescence of EGFPandcalcein blue (see Example
`10; error bars are +s.d).
`FIG. 10. Association of transfection activity with the lipid
`pellet of N-C12-DOPE/DOPC (70:30) prepared with sper-
`mine and pEGFP-C1 plasmid DNA (see Example 3); the
`initial plasmid DNA and spermine solutions contained 200
`mMsucrose. After extrusion anddialysis, half of the sample
`wasusedfor transfection withoutfurther handling(a), and the
`lipid particles from the rest of the sample were pelleted by
`centrifugation and washed once with HBSS before being
`used for transfection (b). An N-C12-DOPE/DOPC(70:30)
`sample with only the 200 mM sucrose wasalso prepared, and
`plasmid DNA and spermine were both added externally just
`before dialysis at an amount equal to that used in the other
`samples. The pellet of this empty sample (c) was prepared the
`same way, then, an equal lipid amount of each of the samples
`was used for transfection under the conditions described in
`the previous figure legends. After overnight incubation, the
`cells were labeled with CBAM andthefluorescence of EGFP
`and calcein blue were measured(error bars are +s.d).
`FIG. 11. Transfection via N-C12 DOPE/DOPC (70:30)
`liposomes in mouseascites fluid compared to buffer. Ascites
`wasobtained from the lavage of a tumor-bearing SCID mouse
`as described in Example 13. Cells were incubated with plas-
`mid DNA-containing liposomes(nota pellet) at a final con-
`centration 10 mMtotal lipid in HBSS or HBSS with ascites
`fluid, at a final protein concentration of approximately 3.5
`mg/ml (see Example 11). After 3 hr. of incubation,the trans-
`fection solution was replaced with serum- and butyrate-con-
`taining medium for approximately 20 hr. Expression of EGFP
`was measuredvia its fluorescence(error bars are +s.d).
`FIG. 12. Fluorescent photomicrographs of OVCAR-3cells
`transfected (see Example 11) with to N-C12 DOPE/DOPC
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`8
`(70:30) liposomes in buffer or mouse ascites fluid. Cells
`treated as described in the legend to FIG. 12 were photo-
`graphed. Photograph A represents transfection without peri-
`toneal ascites fluid and photograph B with peritoneal ascites
`fluid; cells are confluent in these views.
`FIG. 13. Fluorescent probe determination of liposome
`lamellarity.
`FIG. 14. Fluorescent photomicrographs of OVCAR-3
`tumortransfected in vivo with N-C12 DOPE/DOPC(70:30)
`liposomes containing pEGFP-C1. Panel A depicts the expres-
`sion of EGFP. Panel B depicts the red fluorescence from
`rhodamine—labeled liposomes.
`FIG. 15. Fluorescent photomicrographs of OVCAR-3
`tumortaken from a differentsite than FIG. 14 transfected in
`vivo with N-C12 DOPE/DOPC(70:30) liposomes containing
`pEGFP-C1. Panel A depicts the expression of EGFP. Panel B
`depicts the red fluorescence from rhodamine—labeled lipo-
`somes.
`
`FIG. 16. Fluorescent photomicrographs of control tumor
`tissue. Panel A depicts diffuse green fluorescence. Panel B
`depicts the lack ofred fluorescence from rhodamine—labeled
`liposomes
`FIG. 17. Graph depicting expression of (f-galactosidase
`activity in muscletissue after transfection in vivo.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
`
`Following are abbreviations, and the corresponding terms,
`used throughoutthis application: PE, phosphatidylethanola-
`mine; PC, phosphatidyicholine; EPC, egg phosphatidylcho-
`line; DO-, dioleoyl-; DOPC, dioleoyl phosphatidylcholine;
`DOPE, dioleoyl phosphatidylethanolamine; NAPE, N-acy-
`lated phosphatidylethanolamine; N-C12 DOPE, N-dode-
`canoyl dioleoyl phosphatidylethanolamine; AAPV-DOPE,
`Ala-Ala-Pro-Val-dioleoy]
`phosphatidylethanolamine;
`CBAM,calcein blue acetoxy methyl ester, PBS, phosphate
`buffered saline; LSB, low salt buffer; HBSS, Hank’s balanced
`salt solution; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescence protein;
`SPLYV, stable plurilamellar liposomes; MLVs, multilamellar
`liposomes; ULVs, unilamellar liposomes; LUVs, large unila-
`mellar liposomes; SUVs, small unilamellar liposomes; ds
`DNA, double stranded DNA; TEM,transmission electron
`microscopy.
`The present invention provides a method of encapsulating
`a bioactive complex in a liposome which comprises the steps
`of:
`
`(a) dissolving at least one amphipathiclipid in one or more
`organic solvents
`(b) combiningat least one aqueous suspension comprising
`a solution containing a first molecule selected from the
`group consisting of a bioactive agent and a complexing
`agent with the lipid-containing organic solution of step
`(a) so as to form an emulsion in the form of a reverse
`micelle comprising the first molecule andthe lipid;
`(c) adding a second aqueoussuspension comprising a sec-
`ond molecule selected from the group consisting of a
`bioactive agent and a complexing agent wherein if the
`first molecule is a bioactive agent, the second molecule
`is a complexing agent or vice versa, to the emulsion of
`step (b),
`(d) incubating the emulsion of step (c) to allow the com-
`plexing agent to contact the bioactive agent thereby
`forming a complex ofthe bioactive agent with the com-
`plexing agent within lipid stabilized water droplets;
`wherein said complex is no greater in diameter than the
`diameter of the droplet and,
`
`

`

`US 7,491,409 B1
`
`9
`(e) removing the organic solvent from the suspension of
`step (d), so as to form liposomes comprising the com-
`plexed bioactive agent andthe lipid.
`The methodofthe present invention 1s usefulfor the prepa-
`ration of therapeutically useful liposomes containing a wide
`range of bioactive molecules complexed with complexing
`agent within the liposome. Preferably, the liposomesare fuso-
`genic liposomes which by the methodofthe present invention
`can encapsulate a variety of molecules. These fusogeniclipo-
`somes are able to fuse with cell membranes and enable the
`
`delivery of bioactive agents in therapeutically effective
`amounts to cells and organs. In addition, the method of the
`present invention also allows morethan one bioactive agent to
`be encapsulated in a liposome. One or more bioactive agents
`may be encapsulated in the same liposomesat the same time
`by the method of the present invention. If more than one
`bioactive agent is encapsu

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket