throbber
·1· ·UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`·2· ·BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`· · ·-----------------------------------x
`·3· ·MODERNA THERAPEUTICS, INC.,
`
`·4· · · · · · · · ·Petitioner,
`· · · · · ·v.
`·5
`· · ·PROTIVA BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.,
`·6
`· · · · · · · · · ·Patent Owner.
`·7
`· · ·Case IPR2018-00680(Patent 9,404,127)
`·8· ·Case IPR2018-00739 (Patent 9,364,435)
`· · ·-----------------------------------x
`·9
`
`10
`
`11· · · · ·Deposition of ANDREW S. JANOFF, PH.D., as
`
`12· ·reported by Nancy Mahoney, Certified Court Reporter,
`
`13· ·RPR and Notary Public of the States of New York and
`
`14· ·New Jersey, at the Westin Princeton at Forrestal
`
`15· ·Village on Tuesday, December 4, 2018 commencing at
`
`16· ·9:08 a.m.
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`ARBUTUS - EXHIBIT 2001
`Moderna Therapeutics, Inc. v. Arbutus Biopharma Corporation - IPR2019-00554
`
`

`

`·1· ·A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
`·2· ·ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:
`· · · · · ·IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`·3· · · · ·1800 Avenue of the Stars
`· · · · · ·Los Angeles, California 90067-4276
`·4· · · · ·BY:· C. MACLAIN WELLS, ESQUIRE
`· · · · · · · · mwells@irell.com
`·5· · · · · · · MICHAEL R. FLEMING, ESQUIRE
`· · · · · · · · mfleming@irell.com
`·6
`· · ·ON BEHALF OF PATENT OWNER
`·7· · · · ·WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`· · · · · ·701 Fifth Avenue
`·8· · · · ·Seattle, Washington 98104-7036
`· · · · · ·BY:· MICHAEL T. ROSATO, ESQUIRE
`·9· · · · · · · mrosato@wsgr.com
`· · · · · · · · SONJA R. GERRARD, ESQUIRE
`10· · · · · · · srosato@wsgr.com
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`· · ·ALSO PRESENT:
`16
`· · · · · ·Constantine Linnik
`17· · · · ·General Counsel & Compliance Officer
`· · · · · ·Genevant
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · · · · · · · I N D E X
`
`·2
`· · ·WITNESS· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·PAGE
`·3
`· · ·ANDREW S. JANOFF, PH.D.
`·4
`· · · ·Examination by Mr. Rosato· · · · · · · · · · · 5
`·5
`· · · ·Examination by Mr. Wells· · · · · · · · · · ·199
`·6
`· · · · · · · · · · · E X H I B I T S
`·7
`· · ·DESCRIPTION· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · PAGE
`·8
`
`·9· · (Exhibit 1007 Declaration of Andrew S.· · · 23
`
`10· · Janoff, Ph.D. in Support of Moderna
`
`11· · Therapeutics, Inc.'s Petition for Inter
`
`12· · Partes Review of U.S. Patent No.
`
`13· · 9,404,127
`
`14· · (Exhibit 1007 Declaration of Andrew S.· · · 23
`
`15· · Janoff, Ph.D. in Support of Moderna
`
`16· · Therapeutics, Inc.'s Petition for Inter
`
`17· · Partes Review of U.S. Patent No.
`
`18· · 9,364,435
`
`19· · Exhibit 1001 U.S. Patent No. 9,404,127· · · 50
`
`20· · (Exhibit 1018 Curriculum Vitae of Andrew· · 51
`
`21· · S. Janoff, Ph.D.
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · E X H I B I T S· C O N T I N U E D
`
`·2
`
`·3· ·DESCRIPTION· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·PAGE
`
`·4
`
`·5· · Exhibit 2007 U.S. Patent No. 7,491,409· · · 130
`
`·6· · (Exhibit 2020 Combined Declaration for· · · 133
`
`·7· · Patent Application and Power of Attorney
`
`·8· · Exhibit 1002 U.S. Patent No. 8,058,069· · · 153
`
`·9· · Exhibit 1001 U.S. Patent No. 9,364,435· · · 192
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · · · · ANDREW S. JANOFF, PH.D.,
`
`·2· ·having been first duly sworn by the Notary Public
`
`·3· ·(Nancy Mahoney), was examined and testified as
`
`·4· ·follows:
`
`·5· · · · · EXAMINATION BY MR. ROSATO:
`
`·6· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Good morning, Dr. Janoff.
`
`·7· · · · ·A.· · · ·Good morning.
`
`·8· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Would you please state your full name
`
`·9· ·for the record.
`
`10· · · · ·A.· · · ·Andrew S. Janoff.
`
`11· · · · ·Q.· · · ·And thank you again for being here
`
`12· ·this morning.· I'm sure you're familiar with how
`
`13· ·things work in depositions, but we'll quickly go
`
`14· ·through couple procedural aspects.· Do you
`
`15· ·understand that you're providing your testimony
`
`16· ·under oath today and that you're expected to tell
`
`17· ·the truth?
`
`18· · · · ·A.· · · ·I do.
`
`19· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Is there any reason you cannot
`
`20· ·provide complete and accurate testimony today?
`
`21· · · · ·A.· · · ·No.
`
`22· · · · ·Q.· · · ·And hopefully my questions are clear.
`
`23· ·If they're not, please ask me for clarification
`
`24· ·rather than the gentlemen sitting here.· Under the
`
`25· ·rules of this proceeding, you should ask me and
`
`

`

`·1· ·unless you tell me that something is not clear, I'm
`
`·2· ·going to assume that you understand the question.
`
`·3· ·Okay?
`
`·4· · · · · · · · · Which brings me to my next point.
`
`·5· ·Please provide verbal answers or responses rather
`
`·6· ·than nodding your head?
`
`·7· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes.
`
`·8· · · · ·Q.· · · ·It helps the court reporter and make
`
`·9· ·sure we capture that on the record.
`
`10· · · · · · · · · Thank you.· I often forget that one
`
`11· ·myself.
`
`12· · · · · · · · · Then, of course, anytime you need to
`
`13· ·take a break, we can do so as long as there's not a
`
`14· ·question pending.· If there's a question pending,
`
`15· ·we'll ask that you go ahead and provide your
`
`16· ·response before taking a break?
`
`17· · · · · · · · · Is that okay?
`
`18· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes.
`
`19· · · · ·Q.· · · ·I understand that there are some
`
`20· ·issues with your eyesight.
`
`21· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes.
`
`22· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Is that right?· You have difficulty
`
`23· ·reading papers or just reading objects in general?
`
`24· · · · ·A.· · · ·I have difficulty with my eyesight in
`
`25· ·general now.
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·Q.· · · ·And is this -- may I ask, is this
`
`·2· ·age-related presbyopia or is it a unique
`
`·3· ·condition --
`
`·4· · · · ·A.· · · ·No.· It's a temporary loss in vision.
`
`·5· ·It's getting better, but it's not better yet.
`
`·6· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Well, I hope for a full recovery.
`
`·7· · · · · · · · · We have a monitor set up in front of
`
`·8· ·you, and the documents have been provided on a
`
`·9· ·computer that you have access to there.· I will
`
`10· ·still hand you paper copies of documents, and you
`
`11· ·can feel free to look at the paper copies or pull up
`
`12· ·the electronic versions on your computer and look at
`
`13· ·that.
`
`14· · · · · · · · · Okay?
`
`15· · · · ·A.· · · ·Fair enough.
`
`16· · · · ·Q.· · · ·If you have any difficulty locating a
`
`17· ·document, please let me know and verbalize that for
`
`18· ·the record.
`
`19· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes, I will.
`
`20· · · · ·Q.· · · ·It will help give an opportunity to
`
`21· ·pause so I know what you're doing and give you an
`
`22· ·opportunity to find what you're looking for.
`
`23· · · · · · · · · Okay?· And I know counsel is helping
`
`24· ·you access those documents as well.
`
`25· · · · ·A.· · · ·I understand if there is a question
`
`

`

`·1· ·of privilege, I can ask for a break regardless of
`
`·2· ·whether a question is pending or not.· Is that
`
`·3· ·correct?
`
`·4· · · · ·Q.· · · ·If you feel that there's a privilege
`
`·5· ·issue, you should state that you are concerned that
`
`·6· ·there's a privilege issue, and we can decide
`
`·7· ·whether -- we'll deal with the matters as they come
`
`·8· ·up.
`
`·9· · · · ·A.· · · ·Fair enough.
`
`10· · · · ·Q.· · · ·If we need to take a break, we can do
`
`11· ·that.
`
`12· · · · ·A.· · · ·Fair enough.
`
`13· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Thank you for asking that though.
`
`14· · · · · · · · · So as we get started, have you ever
`
`15· ·been deposed before today?
`
`16· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes.
`
`17· · · · ·Q.· · · ·How many times have you been deposed?
`
`18· · · · ·A.· · · ·I don't know exactly.
`
`19· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Can you estimate?
`
`20· · · · ·A.· · · ·Difficult to estimate.· Five, six,
`
`21· ·maybe seven, eight.
`
`22· · · · ·Q.· · · ·About a half dozen times --
`
`23· · · · ·A.· · · ·Maybe more than that.· I can go back
`
`24· ·and look at records if you want to know for sure,
`
`25· ·but as I sit here today, I can't say for sure.
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·Q.· · · ·So about a dozen probably?
`
`·2· · · · ·A.· · · ·In that -- in that ballpark, likely.
`
`·3· ·That's my recollection.
`
`·4· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Do you recall what those cases --
`
`·5· ·what types of cases those were?
`
`·6· · · · ·A.· · · ·I do.
`
`·7· · · · ·Q.· · · ·What were they?
`
`·8· · · · ·A.· · · ·I'm not sure that I can say.· I don't
`
`·9· ·know whether I'm violating privilege if I tell you.
`
`10· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Were they public cases?
`
`11· · · · ·A.· · · ·In some cases yes; in some cases no,
`
`12· ·and I'm just trying to make sure that I'm not -- I'm
`
`13· ·not violating any privilege at all.· Some of them go
`
`14· ·way back in time, and I'm just not -- I'm just not
`
`15· ·certain.· I testified for AstraZeneca in federal
`
`16· ·court, and I was deposed in that case and that's
`
`17· ·public, so I can tell you that.· I'm just not sure
`
`18· ·of the other cases.
`
`19· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Do you remember -- besides the
`
`20· ·AstraZeneca case, do you remember any cases that are
`
`21· ·public?
`
`22· · · · ·A.· · · ·As I sit here today, I'm not sure
`
`23· ·whether they became public or not.
`
`24· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Are any of those public cases listed
`
`25· ·on your CV or stated in your declaration?
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·A.· · · ·They probably are.· So if you show me
`
`·2· ·my CV, that would be helpful.
`
`·3· · · · ·Q.· · · ·When was the last time you updated
`
`·4· ·your CV?
`
`·5· · · · ·A.· · · ·About a year ago likely.
`
`·6· · · · ·Q.· · · ·And you don't recall from updating
`
`·7· ·that what may have been put in there?
`
`·8· · · · ·A.· · · ·If you show me my CV, it would be
`
`·9· ·very helpful.
`
`10· · · · ·Q.· · · ·I'm mainly interested in your
`
`11· ·recollection.
`
`12· · · · ·A.· · · ·I'd like to see my CV and then I can
`
`13· ·tell you.
`
`14· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Sure.· Why don't you go ahead and
`
`15· ·pull that up on the computer, if you have access to
`
`16· ·that document.
`
`17· · · · ·A.· · · ·I'm having difficulty with this.· Can
`
`18· ·we bring this closer, and then we want to scroll
`
`19· ·down, I think.· Just give me a moment.
`
`20· · · · ·Q.· · · ·I'm also going to hand you a paper
`
`21· ·copy of your CV.
`
`22· · · · ·A.· · · ·That might be ...
`
`23· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Which is Exhibit 2021 in the record.
`
`24· · · · ·A.· · · ·Just bear with me.· You see the
`
`25· ·expert testimony section in the federal court, that
`
`

`

`·1· ·was AstraZeneca, and I know that's public.
`
`·2· · · · ·Q.· · · ·What page are you looking at?
`
`·3· · · · ·A.· · · ·I'm looking at page 2, I believe.
`
`·4· ·These are double-sided.
`
`·5· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Are you referring to under the
`
`·6· ·heading Advisory Committee/Consulting --
`
`·7· · · · ·A.· · · ·No.· If you go down to the next big
`
`·8· ·heading, you see where it says Expert Testimony?
`
`·9· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Yes.
`
`10· · · · ·A.· · · ·That's what I'm referring to.
`
`11· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Under Expert Testimony it states only
`
`12· ·United States Federal District Court.
`
`13· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes.· And I'm telling you that I can
`
`14· ·tell you that that was AstraZeneca.
`
`15· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Are there any United States Federal
`
`16· ·District Court cases other than AstraZeneca?
`
`17· · · · ·A.· · · ·Not -- no.· And there were other
`
`18· ·depositions that happened in this period; and,
`
`19· ·again, I'm not -- you don't see them on here, and
`
`20· ·I'm not sure whether they're privileged or not, and
`
`21· ·they were depositions that happened when I was
`
`22· ·defending what people called the Janoff patents when
`
`23· ·I was at the Liposome Company, and there were
`
`24· ·patents that had to do with lyophilization when I
`
`25· ·was at the Liposome Company.· I don't list them on
`
`

`

`·1· ·here because they were so long ago.
`
`·2· · · · · · · · · If the question is how many times
`
`·3· ·have I been deposed, again, I'll guess at a dozen,
`
`·4· ·and I can tell you for sure about the AstraZeneca
`
`·5· ·case, but I'm uncertain whether I can talk about the
`
`·6· ·other cases.· If you'd like, I can check with
`
`·7· ·counsel and at some point let you know.
`
`·8· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Why don't we do this.· On page 1 of
`
`·9· ·your CV under the heading Professional Positions,
`
`10· ·you list the title Expert Consultant.
`
`11· · · · · · · · · Do you see that?
`
`12· · · · ·A.· · · ·I do.
`
`13· · · · ·Q.· · · ·And the date corresponding to expert
`
`14· ·consultant states 2012, dash, which I assume means
`
`15· ·to the present.
`
`16· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes.
`
`17· · · · ·Q.· · · ·How about if you check with counsel
`
`18· ·and figure out the list of expert consultant
`
`19· ·positions or expert witness positions that are
`
`20· ·publicly available or non-confidential that you
`
`21· ·could disclose and you can give us some
`
`22· ·identification of those.· We don't have to do this
`
`23· ·today.· We can follow up with that.
`
`24· · · · ·A.· · · ·Okay.
`
`25· · · · · · · · · MR. WELLS:· We'll work it out off
`
`

`

`·1· ·offline.· Doesn't need to be on the transcript.
`
`·2· · · · ·Q.· · · ·You mentioned the AstraZeneca case
`
`·3· ·earlier.· Was your role an expert -- technical
`
`·4· ·expert witness in that case?
`
`·5· · · · ·A.· · · ·I was an expert witness in that case.
`
`·6· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Was expert witness your only role in
`
`·7· ·that case?
`
`·8· · · · ·A.· · · ·I'm not sure exactly if I understand
`
`·9· ·the question.
`
`10· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Did you serve as a fact witness, for
`
`11· ·example?
`
`12· · · · ·A.· · · ·I'm not sure I understand the
`
`13· ·distinction.
`
`14· · · · ·Q.· · · ·You don't understand the distinction
`
`15· ·between being a witness as to expert testimony
`
`16· ·versus being a witness as --
`
`17· · · · ·A.· · · ·You'd have to tell me -- specifically
`
`18· ·what you're getting at because I don't understand
`
`19· ·the question.
`
`20· · · · ·Q.· · · ·I'm asking what your role was in the
`
`21· ·case.
`
`22· · · · · · · · · MR. WELLS:· Asked and answered.
`
`23· · · · ·Q.· · · ·An expert witness?
`
`24· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes.
`
`25· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Anything else?
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·A.· · · ·I was an expert witness for
`
`·2· ·AstraZeneca.
`
`·3· · · · ·Q.· · · ·So nothing other than an expert
`
`·4· ·witness?
`
`·5· · · · ·A.· · · ·I was an expert witness for
`
`·6· ·AstraZeneca.
`
`·7· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Was there anything other than expert
`
`·8· ·witness activity?
`
`·9· · · · ·A.· · · ·I was compensated as an expert
`
`10· ·witness for AstraZeneca.
`
`11· · · · ·Q.· · · ·That's not what I asked you.
`
`12· · · · ·A.· · · ·That's my answer.
`
`13· · · · ·Q.· · · ·So you're not going to answer the
`
`14· ·question?
`
`15· · · · ·A.· · · ·I am answering the question.
`
`16· · · · · · · · · MR. WELLS:· Objection, asked and
`
`17· ·answered, argumentative.
`
`18· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Did you do anything in the
`
`19· ·AstraZeneca case other than your service as an
`
`20· ·expert witness?
`
`21· · · · ·A.· · · ·I performed the duties that I was
`
`22· ·compensated for as an expert witness in that case.
`
`23· · · · ·Q.· · · ·What were those duties?
`
`24· · · · ·A.· · · ·To testify on behalf of AstraZeneca
`
`25· ·in that case.· And I'm not sure what privilege I
`
`

`

`·1· ·might be violating if I go further than that.
`
`·2· ·What's on the record is that I'm an expert witness
`
`·3· ·and I was an expert witness and I testified in
`
`·4· ·federal court.· There's a transcript of that and a
`
`·5· ·record of that, and anything else that I did for
`
`·6· ·AstraZeneca is encompassed -- was encompassed in my
`
`·7· ·duties as an expert witness, but I'm not sure
`
`·8· ·whether some of that is privileged or not.
`
`·9· · · · ·Q.· · · ·I see, okay.· I just want to know
`
`10· ·generally about your role.· I'm not asking about
`
`11· ·anything confidential or privileged.· So I
`
`12· ·understand that concern.
`
`13· · · · · · · · · Now, you filed two declarations in
`
`14· ·two different proceedings in this case.
`
`15· · · · ·A.· · · ·That's correct.
`
`16· · · · ·Q.· · · ·One is the IPR 2018-00680 case
`
`17· ·challenging U.S. Patent 9,404,127.
`
`18· · · · · · · · · Do you understand that?
`
`19· · · · ·A.· · · ·That's correct.
`
`20· · · · ·Q.· · · ·And you refer to that patent as the
`
`21· ·'127 patent.
`
`22· · · · ·A.· · · ·Fair enough.
`
`23· · · · ·Q.· · · ·And I may refer to that case as the
`
`24· ·'127 patent IPR; you'll know what I mean?
`
`25· · · · ·A.· · · ·If I don't -- if I'm unclear, I'll
`
`

`

`·1· ·ask.
`
`·2· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Thank you.
`
`·3· · · · · · · · · There's another case and that's IPR
`
`·4· ·2018-00739 challenging U.S. Patent 9,364,435, right?
`
`·5· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes, I see it.
`
`·6· · · · ·Q.· · · ·And I'll also refer to that patent as
`
`·7· ·the '435 patent.· Is that okay?
`
`·8· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes.
`
`·9· · · · ·Q.· · · ·And that case -- the '435 patent IPR,
`
`10· ·and you'll know what I mean or ask me if you don't,
`
`11· ·right?
`
`12· · · · ·A.· · · ·I will.
`
`13· · · · ·Q.· · · ·I mentioned this because we're going
`
`14· ·to talk about both of those cases today.· Okay?
`
`15· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes.
`
`16· · · · ·Q.· · · ·We're trying to be efficient so we
`
`17· ·don't keep you here for multiple days, so some of
`
`18· ·the questions I ask will be relevant to both of
`
`19· ·those cases.· Okay?
`
`20· · · · ·A.· · · ·If I don't understand the questions
`
`21· ·that you're asking, I'll ask for clarification.
`
`22· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Fair enough.· If I'm asking a
`
`23· ·question you feel necessary to make a distinction
`
`24· ·between the two cases, you can let me know.· Okay?
`
`25· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes.
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·Q.· · · ·So for this case, are you being
`
`·2· ·compensated for your testimony?
`
`·3· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes.
`
`·4· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Who's providing that compensation?
`
`·5· · · · ·A.· · · ·Moderna.
`
`·6· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Moderna is the petitioner in this
`
`·7· ·case?
`
`·8· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes.
`
`·9· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Are you being paid at an hourly rate?
`
`10· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes.
`
`11· · · · ·Q.· · · ·And what is your rate?
`
`12· · · · ·A.· · · ·$750 an hour.
`
`13· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Are you receiving any compensation
`
`14· ·other than the compensation of your hourly rate?
`
`15· · · · ·A.· · · ·I'm reimbursed for expenses if there
`
`16· ·are expenses.
`
`17· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Are you receiving any compensation in
`
`18· ·the form of stock or equity?
`
`19· · · · ·A.· · · ·No.
`
`20· · · · ·Q.· · · ·So you don't have any financial
`
`21· ·interest in Moderna?
`
`22· · · · ·A.· · · ·No financial interest in Moderna.
`
`23· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Do you have any personal interest in
`
`24· ·Moderna?
`
`25· · · · · · · · · MR. WELLS:· Objection, vague.
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·A.· · · ·I don't know what you mean by
`
`·2· ·personal interest.
`
`·3· · · · ·Q.· · · ·You seem to make a distinction of
`
`·4· ·financial interest.· I'm wondering if there's any
`
`·5· ·other interest.
`
`·6· · · · ·A.· · · ·I'm making a distinction or you're
`
`·7· ·making a distinction?
`
`·8· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Seems like you made a distinction
`
`·9· ·with financial interest.
`
`10· · · · ·A.· · · ·No, I'm making no distinction.
`
`11· · · · ·Q.· · · ·So your only interest in Moderna is
`
`12· ·your role as an expert witness?
`
`13· · · · ·A.· · · ·I've been asked to be an expert
`
`14· ·witness, and I'm compensated as such.
`
`15· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Other than these IPRs, do you have
`
`16· ·any relationship with Moderna?
`
`17· · · · ·A.· · · ·Not that I'm aware of.
`
`18· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Have you been an expert witness for
`
`19· ·Moderna in the past or currently in other cases,
`
`20· ·with the proviso of non-privileged,
`
`21· ·non-confidential?
`
`22· · · · ·A.· · · ·Not that I'm aware of.
`
`23· · · · ·Q.· · · ·With the same proviso, are you an
`
`24· ·expert in any other cases with the Irell law firm
`
`25· ·that you can speak of?
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·A.· · · ·I'm not an expert in any other case
`
`·2· ·for that particular law firm, the Irell law firm
`
`·3· ·that you mentioned.
`
`·4· · · · ·Q.· · · ·How did you come to be an expert in
`
`·5· ·this matter?
`
`·6· · · · · · · · · MR. WELLS:· I would caution the
`
`·7· ·witness not to divulge the content of any
`
`·8· ·communications with attorneys, but you can generally
`
`·9· ·answer to the extent it doesn't reflect those
`
`10· ·communications.
`
`11· · · · ·A.· · · ·I was asked to be an expert.
`
`12· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Who asked you to be an expert?
`
`13· · · · ·A.· · · ·Is this a question of privilege?
`
`14· · · · · · · · · MR. WELLS:· If you're asking -- you
`
`15· ·can identify the person who asked you, but I would
`
`16· ·caution you not to divulge the content of any
`
`17· ·communications with attorneys.
`
`18· · · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· I can identify the
`
`19· ·person?
`
`20· · · · · · · · · MR. WELLS:· Yes.
`
`21· · · · ·A.· · · ·So it was Maclain who asked me,
`
`22· ·Maclain Wells.
`
`23· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Did you know Maclain prior to working
`
`24· ·on this case?
`
`25· · · · ·A.· · · ·No, I didn't.
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·Q.· · · ·What did you do to prepare for your
`
`·2· ·deposition today?
`
`·3· · · · ·A.· · · ·I reviewed the relevant parts of my
`
`·4· ·declaration, and I reviewed relevant references.
`
`·5· · · · ·Q.· · · ·By relevant references, are you
`
`·6· ·referring to the references that were cited in your
`
`·7· ·declaration?
`
`·8· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes.
`
`·9· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Were there any references other than
`
`10· ·the references cited in your declaration?
`
`11· · · · ·A.· · · ·Not that I -- I don't believe so.
`
`12· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Were there any other materials that
`
`13· ·you reviewed other than what's in your declaration?
`
`14· · · · ·A.· · · ·I reviewed the preliminary response
`
`15· ·of the patent owner in both cases, we'll call them
`
`16· ·the '127 and '435; I had a look at the board's --
`
`17· ·we'll call it the board's decision in both cases,
`
`18· ·and I believe it probably stopped there, but I can't
`
`19· ·be certain.
`
`20· · · · ·Q.· · · ·So no other documents other than the
`
`21· ·references of the record, the patent owner responses
`
`22· ·and the board's decision?
`
`23· · · · ·A.· · · ·I didn't say that.· I may have looked
`
`24· ·at other documents that are not listed, but I can't
`
`25· ·tell you what they are.
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Why can't you tell me what they are?
`
`·2· · · · ·A.· · · ·Because I don't remember.· I mean, if
`
`·3· ·you show me a document and asked if I reviewed it, I
`
`·4· ·would be able to tell you; but as I sit here today,
`
`·5· ·I reviewed these declarations for sure; I reviewed
`
`·6· ·the response of the patent holder for sure; I
`
`·7· ·reviewed the board's decision for sure.· There were
`
`·8· ·references listed in my declaration that I can't
`
`·9· ·tell you that I looked at all of them, but I looked
`
`10· ·at the relevant parts of many of them.
`
`11· · · · · · · · · And there might have been other
`
`12· ·papers in my library that I could have looked at. I
`
`13· ·can't tell you that I didn't, but I can't tell you
`
`14· ·what they are because I read a lot of things.· If
`
`15· ·you're interested in whether I read something or
`
`16· ·not, show me the document and I'll tell you.
`
`17· · · · ·Q.· · · ·I wasn't in your office at the time
`
`18· ·so it's hard for me to do that.· I'm just asking
`
`19· ·generally what you did to prepare for today's
`
`20· ·deposition.
`
`21· · · · · · · · · You understand that?
`
`22· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes, and generally I've answered the
`
`23· ·question, I think.
`
`24· · · · ·Q.· · · ·I think you have.· I think what you
`
`25· ·mentioned were maybe there were some other documents
`
`

`

`·1· ·in your office that you accessed as would be
`
`·2· ·available to you.· Is that right?
`
`·3· · · · ·A.· · · ·Maybe.
`
`·4· · · · ·Q.· · · ·When did you prepare for your
`
`·5· ·deposition?
`
`·6· · · · ·A.· · · ·I met with counsel these last two
`
`·7· ·days, I guess Sunday and Monday.
`
`·8· · · · ·Q.· · · ·I'm sorry you had to spend your
`
`·9· ·Sunday reading legal documents.
`
`10· · · · ·A.· · · ·That's okay.· And I have to say that
`
`11· ·prior to meeting with counsel, knowing that this
`
`12· ·deposition was on the calendar, I likely looked at,
`
`13· ·reviewed the case the way I represented to you
`
`14· ·because it had been sometime since these were filed.
`
`15· ·I'm looking at the dates here, June 14th, it's now
`
`16· ·December.
`
`17· · · · · · · · · So there was a lot of activity around
`
`18· ·the June/August time frame and in order to recall
`
`19· ·the nature of the case, I probably spent time in my
`
`20· ·own office prior to meeting with counsel so that I
`
`21· ·didn't waste counsel's time.
`
`22· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Sure.· When you say you met with
`
`23· ·counsel, you're referring to Maclain?
`
`24· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes, and I also met with --
`
`25· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Mr. Fleming?
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·A.· · · ·-- Mr. Fleming, my new best friend.
`
`·2· · · · ·Q.· · · ·We're all friends here, so appreciate
`
`·3· ·that.
`
`·4· · · · · · · · · I'm going to hand you a copy of your
`
`·5· ·declaration from the '127 case.
`
`·6· · · · ·A.· · · ·Is that what I have in front of me
`
`·7· ·here?
`
`·8· · · · · · · · · MR. WELLS:· It is, but if you prefer
`
`·9· ·to use the copy that you have, I'm happy to do that.
`
`10· · · · · · · · · MR. ROSATO:· That's right, you guys
`
`11· ·have a copy.
`
`12· · · · ·Q.· · · ·So, for the record, you have a copy
`
`13· ·there of Exhibit 1007 from the '127 IPR.
`
`14· · · · · · · · · (Exhibit 1007 Declaration of Andrew
`
`15· ·S. Janoff, Ph.D. in Support of Moderna Therapeutics,
`
`16· ·Inc.'s Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S.
`
`17· ·Patent No. 9,404,127 marked for identification and
`
`18· ·attached to the transcript.)
`
`19· · · · · · · · · (Exhibit 1007 Declaration of Andrew
`
`20· ·S. Janoff, Ph.D. in Support of Moderna Therapeutics,
`
`21· ·Inc.'s Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S.
`
`22· ·Patent No. 9,364,435 marked for identification and
`
`23· ·attached to the transcript.)
`
`24· · · · ·A.· · · ·I'm sorry, I'm confused now.
`
`25· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Can I just look at them so I can help
`
`

`

`·1· ·you guys identify which documents I'm looking at.
`
`·2· · · · · · · · · Now I'm physically handing you a copy
`
`·3· ·of Exhibit 1007 from the '127 patent IPR.· Do you
`
`·4· ·recognize that document?
`
`·5· · · · ·A.· · · ·I recognized the front page of the
`
`·6· ·document.· If you'd like me to look at every page of
`
`·7· ·the document to ensure that I recognize that, I can
`
`·8· ·do it, but I'm not doing that as we sit here now.
`
`·9· ·I'm just relying on your representation that this is
`
`10· ·the document if that's okay.
`
`11· · · · · · · · · MR. WELLS:· And I'll represent for
`
`12· ·the record that this is a complete copy of the
`
`13· ·corpus of his declaration and the '127 patent that
`
`14· ·was provided to counsel.
`
`15· · · · · · · · · MR. ROSATO:· Thank you.
`
`16· · · · ·Q.· · · ·A large part of these questions are
`
`17· ·just to identify for the record what I'm handing you
`
`18· ·so when someone reads the transcript later they will
`
`19· ·know what we're talking about.
`
`20· · · · · · · · · You also have access to an electronic
`
`21· ·version of that document on your computer.· You
`
`22· ·don't have to necessarily pull this up now, but I'm
`
`23· ·just letting now that.· Okay?
`
`24· · · · ·A.· · · ·Thank you.
`
`25· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Im also handing you, while we're
`
`

`

`·1· ·handing out declarations, a copy of your declaration
`
`·2· ·in the '435 patent case.· Do you see that?
`
`·3· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes.
`
`·4· · · · ·Q.· · · ·And you recognize that document?
`
`·5· · · · ·A.· · · ·I recognize the cover page of the
`
`·6· ·document, represented to me that this is the entire
`
`·7· ·document, then I'll accept that.
`
`·8· · · · · · · · · MR. WELLS:· I'll make the same
`
`·9· ·representation.
`
`10· · · · · · · · · MR. ROSATO:· Thank you.
`
`11· · · · ·Q.· · · ·And likewise you have an electronic
`
`12· ·copy on your computer you can access as needed.
`
`13· · · · · · · · · And I see from your declaration as
`
`14· ·well as your CV you have a Ph.D. in biophysics.· Is
`
`15· ·that right?
`
`16· · · · ·A.· · · ·That's correct.
`
`17· · · · ·Q.· · · ·You have other degrees?
`
`18· · · · ·A.· · · ·I have a master's in biophysics, and
`
`19· ·I have other degrees as well.
`
`20· · · · ·Q.· · · ·What are your other degrees?
`
`21· · · · ·A.· · · ·I have a bachelor's in biology.
`
`22· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Anything else?
`
`23· · · · ·A.· · · ·I may have honorary degrees, but as I
`
`24· ·sit here today, I can't litanize them for you.
`
`25· · · · ·Q.· · · ·And you're an honorary New Jersey
`
`

`

`·1· ·resident which I respect on a different level, but
`
`·2· ·other than that --
`
`·3· · · · ·A.· · · ·I'm not an honorary New Jersey
`
`·4· ·resident.· I'm a New Jersey resident.
`
`·5· · · · ·Q.· · · ·A literal New Jersey resident?
`
`·6· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes.
`
`·7· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Okay, fair enough.
`
`·8· · · · · · · · · Do you have any legal training?
`
`·9· · · · ·A.· · · ·No.
`
`10· · · · ·Q.· · · ·No law degree?
`
`11· · · · ·A.· · · ·No.
`
`12· · · · ·Q.· · · ·It's fair to assume then you left the
`
`13· ·drafting of the legal documents to the lawyers?
`
`14· · · · · · · · · MR. WELLS:· Objection, vague.
`
`15· · · · ·A.· · · ·These documents that you have in
`
`16· ·front of me represent my opinions, and I've signed
`
`17· ·these documents representing that they're my
`
`18· ·opinions under penalty and under oath.
`
`19· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Did you prepare any other documents
`
`20· ·in the course of this proceeding?
`
`21· · · · · · · · · MR. WELLS:· Objection, vague.· And to
`
`22· ·the extent it calls for attorney-client privileged
`
`23· ·information, to the extent you prepared other
`
`24· ·materials that were submitted to the patent office,
`
`25· ·which is what I think counsel is asking, you can
`
`

`

`·1· ·answer that question.
`
`·2· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Fair enough.· Let me restate.
`
`·3· · · · · · · · · Did you prepare any other documents
`
`·4· ·that were filed and of record in this case?
`
`·5· · · · ·A.· · · ·Not that I'm aware of.
`
`·6· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Do you have specific experience
`
`·7· ·working with lipid particles?
`
`·8· · · · ·A.· · · ·Yes.· But let me just rephrase that.
`
`·9· ·I'd like you to define for me what you mean by lipid
`
`10· ·particles.
`
`11· · · · ·Q.· · · ·So you don't know what I mean if I
`
`12· ·ask if you have specific experience working with
`
`13· ·lipid particles?
`
`14· · · · ·A.· · · ·No, I didn't say that.· I said that I
`
`15· ·would like you to define what you mean by lipid
`
`16· ·particles so I can accurately answer the question
`
`17· ·that you put forth because different people may have
`
`18· ·different conceptions of lipid particles.
`
`19· · · · · · · · · So if you could -- you've asked me a
`
`20· ·question and you've asked me whether I have
`
`21· ·experience with an entity.· I'd like you to
`
`22· ·specifically describe that entity so that I can
`
`23· ·accurately answer the question.
`
`24· · · · ·Q.· · · ·However you understand the term lipid
`
`25· ·particles.
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·A.· · · ·But that's too vague.· Have I worked
`
`·2· ·with lipids; could you rephrase that question?
`
`·3· · · · ·Q.· · · ·My question was:· Do you have
`
`·4· ·specific experience working with lipid particles?
`
`·5· · · · · · · · · MR. WELLS:· Objection, vague.
`
`·6· · · · ·A.· · · ·You'd have to tell me what lipid
`
`·7· ·particles are, how you mean lipid particles.· This
`
`·8· ·is a term that has different meanings for different
`
`·9· ·people; and in order for me to truthfully answer
`
`10· ·this question and accurately answer this question,
`
`11· ·you need to describe to me specifically what you
`
`12· ·mean by lipid particles.
`
`13· · · · ·Q.· · · ·How do you understand lipid
`
`14· ·particles?
`
`15· · · · ·A.· · · ·Different people understand lipid
`
`16· ·particles in different ways and in different
`
`17· ·contexts.· So I need to know specifically what
`
`18· ·you're talking about.
`
`19· · · · ·Q.· · · ·You said different people.· I'm
`
`20· ·asking about you.
`
`21· · · · ·A.· · · ·It would depend on the context and
`
`22· ·the environment and the utility; would depend on
`
`23· ·many things.· So in isolation I can't answer that
`
`24· ·question because to me that term has many different
`
`25· ·meanings.
`
`

`

`·1· · · · ·Q.· · · ·What's one of the meanings you can
`
`·2· ·think of?
`
`·3· · · · ·A.· · · ·You'll have to ask me, and I'll tell
`
`·4· ·you whether this is something that I would accept to
`
`·5· ·be a lipid particle or not.· I can't guess at what
`
`·6· ·you're asking me.
`
`·7· · · · · · · · · MR. ROSATO:· Can you re-read my
`
`·8· ·question, Court Reporter, please.
`
`·9· · · · · · · · · (Pending question read.)
`
`10· · · · · · · · · MR. WELLS:· Objection, asked and
`
`11· ·answered.
`
`12· · · · ·Q.· · · ·You can still answer the question.
`
`13· · · · · · · · · MR. WELLS:· Same objection.
`
`14· · · · ·A.· · · ·I would need to know the context.
`
`15· ·You'd have to provide me a context.
`
`16· · · · ·Q.· · · ·So you can't think of a single
`
`17· ·meaning of lipid particle?
`
`18· · · · ·A.· · · ·Didn't say that.
`
`19· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Can you think of one meaning of the
`
`20· ·term lipid particle?
`
`21· · · · ·A.· · · ·It would depend on the context and a
`
`22· ·variety of other factors; otherwise, I'm not able to
`
`23· ·answer the question accurately.· So if you could
`
`24· ·define for me what -- the context that you would
`
`25· ·like me to consider, I can answer the question.· But
`
`

`

`·1· ·I can't answer the -- it's a vague, vague, vague
`
`·2· ·question, and I can't answer a vague question with
`
`·3· ·any sort of accuracy.
`
`·4· · · · ·Q.· · · ·Just to be clear, you consider the
`
`·5· ·question, "Do you have specific experience working
`
`·6· ·with lipid particles," to be a vague question?
`
`·7· · · · · · · · · MR. WELLS:· Objection, argumentative.
`
`·8· · · · ·A.· · · ·In order to answer what a lipid
`
`·9· ·particle is accurately, I would need to know the
`
`10· ·context in which you -- i

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket