throbber
Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING INC.,
` Petitioner,
` vs.
` SLEEP NUMBER CORPORATION, f/k/a
` SELECT COMFORT CORPORATION,
` Patent Owner.
` CASE IPR2019-00514(Patent 5,904,172)
`__________________________________________________
`
`
`
` DEPOSITION OF ROBERT GIACHETTI, PhD, PE
` October 7, 2019
` Chicago, Illinois
`
`Reported by:
`Karen P. Burns, C.S.R.
`Job no.: 26063
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2067
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 1
`
`

`

`1
` I N D E X
`2 WITNESS EXAMINATION
`3
`ROBERT GIACHETTI
`4
` Cross-examination by Ms. Nath 5
`
` E X H I B I T S
`EXHIBIT NAME DESCRIPTION PAGE
`Giachetti Exhibit
` Exhibit 1 Exhibit 1005 6
` Exhibit 2 Exhibit 1006 7
` Exhibit 3 Document Bates numbered 29
` WA 11287419.5
`
` Exhibit 4 Exhibit 1001 74
`
` Exhibit 5 Exhibit 1004 75
`
` Exhibit 6 Exhibit 1007 147
`
` Exhibit 7 Exhibit 1011 194
`
` Exhibit 8 Exhibit 1014 214
`
` Exhibit 9 Exhibit 1008 224
`
` Exhibit 10 Exhibit 1012 255
`
` Exhibit 11 Exhibit 1009 269
`
` Exhibit 12 Exhibit 1010 277
`
` Exhibit 13 Majority Opinion, Chapco, Inc. 281
` vs. Woodway USA, Inc.
` Exhibit 14 Williams v. Tristar Products, 281
` Inc., Slip Copy (2019)
`
`Page 4
`
`Page 5
`
`56
`
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 2
` The deposition of ROBERT GIACHETTI, PhD, PE,
`taken pursuant to Notice, held at 321 North Clark
`Street, Suite 1600, Chicago, Illinois, on the
`7th day of October, 2019, at 9:02 a.m.,
`before Karen P. Burns, a Certified Shorthand
`Reporter and Notary Public within and for the
`County of DuPage and State of Illinois.
`
`Page 3
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`
`89
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`APPEARANCES:
` SPENCER FANE LLP
` BY: MR. JASPAL SINGH HARE, ESQ.
`
` 5700 Granite Parkway
` Suite 650
` Plano, Texas 75024-6622
` (317) 294-7132
` jhare@spencerfane.com,
`
` -and-
`
` SPENCER FANE LLP
` BY: MR. KEVIN S. TUTTLE, ESQ.
` 1000 Walnut Street
` Suite 1400
` Kansas City, Missouri 64106-2140
` (816) 474-8100
` ktuttle@spencerfane.com,
` On behalf of the petitioner;
` FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
` BY: MS. ARCHANA NATH, ESQ.
` MR. LUKE D. TOFT, ESQ.
` 222 South Ninth Street
` Suite 2000
` Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-3338
` (612) 607-7000
` anath@foxrothschild.com
` ltoft@foxrothschild.com,
`
` -and-
`
` PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
` BY: MS. KECIA J. REYNOLDS, ESQ. (by telephone)
` 1200 Seventh Street, NW
` Washington, D.C. 20036
` (202) 663-8000
` kecia.reynolds@pillsburylaw.com,
`
` On behalf of the patent owner.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
` (Witness duly sworn.)
`2
` ROBERT GIACHETTI,
`3
`having been first duly sworn, was examined and
`4
`testified as follows:
`5
` CROSS-EXAMINATION
`6
`BY MS. NATH:
`7
` Q. Good morning, Mr. Giachetti. My name
`8
`is Archana Nath. We met before off the record.
`9 You've been retained as an expert in these
`10
`proceedings, is that correct?
`11
` A. That's correct.
`12
` Q. Have you been deposed before?
`13
` A. I have.
`14
` Q. So you know all the rules?
`15
` A. Yes. Most of the rules, I should say.
`16
` Q. And you'll remember that the court
`17
`reporter is writing everything down, so I think
`18
`the biggest thing is let's try to not talk over
`19
`each other, okay?
`20
` A. Okay.
`21
` MS. NATH: I'm going to mark a document
`22
`as Exhibit 1. This is Exhibit 1005 in the
`23
`proceedings.
`24
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`2 (Pages 2 to 5)
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2067
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Page 6
`
`Page 8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` (Whereupon, Giachetti Deposition
` Exhibit No. 1 was marked for
` identification.)
`BY MS. NATH:
` Q. I just handed you a copy of your expert
`report in this case, is that right?
` A. Without going through it, it looks like
`it.
` Q. Okay. And this report includes all of
`your opinions relating to this matter to date?
` A. Regarding the patents, yes.
` Q. The patents. And what patents are you
`talking about?
` A. The '172 patent in particular and all
`the things that went into this report.
` Q. Okay. And when you say the '172
`patent, are you talking about patent number
`5,904,172?
` A. That's right. By Gifft.
` Q. So if we say '172 or Gifft, you'll know
`that we are talking about the patent at issue in
`this proceeding?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And you agree with everything that
`you've set forth in your declaration -- or in
`
`Page 7
`
`1
`your report, excuse me?
`2
` A. Yes. It's mine.
`3
` Q. And actually, you signed it here on --
`4
` A. Should be the 29th of December.
`5
` Q. You signed it here on page 187?
`6
` A. Yes.
`7
` Q. And you have a conclusion here in
`8
`paragraph 356 and you have an opinion that the
`9
`'172 patent is invalid, is that correct?
`10
` A. That's correct.
`11
` MS. NATH: I would like to hand you
`12 what we are going to mark as Exhibit 2, which is
`13
`1006 in the proceeding.
`14
` (Whereupon, Giachetti Deposition
`15
` Exhibit No. 2 was marked for
`16
` identification.)
`17
`BY MS. NATH:
`18
` Q. Is Exhibit 2 the CV that you attached
`19
`to your report?
`20
` A. This looks like it.
`21
` Q. So let's talk a little bit about your
`22
`background, then. You are a licensed
`23
`professional engineer?
`24
` A. That's correct.
`25
` Q. Do you have any experience with
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`1
`adjustable air mattresses?
`2
` A. I have experience personally with
`3
`inflatable air mattresses. I do work in an area
`4
`that is analogous to that.
`5
` Q. Okay. So what's your experience
`6
`personally with an adjustable air mattress?
`7
` A. Well, I have them. I own one, I've
`8
`used one.
`9
` Q. Which one do you have?
`10
` A. I don't remember actually.
`11
` Q. You don't know the brand?
`12
` A. I don't.
`13
` Q. And then you said you work in an
`14
`analogous area. So what is that area?
`15
` A. So I do some work in fluids and fluid
`16
`power, so as part of that work I've had a number
`17
`of cases where I've built equipment or
`18
`investigated equipment that involves pumps,
`19
`computer control and filling bladders.
`20
` Q. What types of bladders or for what
`21
`application?
`22
` A. Well, I've worked on -- I've done
`23
`hydraulics and pneumatics so I've done
`24
`cylinders, I've done -- let's see. I've done
`25 water balloons, I've done expandable -- well,
`Page 9
`
`1
`this project is ongoing so I can't really
`2
`discuss it, but it's basically an expandable
`3
`innertube that is filled cyclically and I built
`4
`a test apparatus using both pneumatics and
`5
`hydraulics to fill it to a set pressure and then
`6
`that pressure is relieved and the cycle
`7
`continues, and it uses manifolds and pressure
`8
`sensors.
`9
` Q. What area is that in? So it's not air
`10
`adjustable mattresses, right?
`11
` A. The product itself is not an air
`12 mattress, but it uses all of the same technology
`13
`that is in an air mattress.
`14
` Q. Can you tell me what the product is or
`15
`at least the area?
`16
` A. It's a consumer product for household
`17
`use.
`18
` Q. Does it have anything to do with sleep?
`19
` A. No.
`20
` Q. When did the project start?
`21
` A. That one started in about 2011.
`22
` Q. You said it related to an expandable
`23
`innertube?
`24
` A. That's right.
`25
` Q. How is that the same or different than
`3 (Pages 6 to 9)
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2067
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Page 10
`
`1
`a bladder?
`2
` A. So sometimes bladders have a little
`3
`flexibility to them, sometimes they don't. This
`4
`particular product has two layers. You could
`5
`consider one a jacket, which is more rigid in
`6
`comparison to the innertube inside, which would
`7
`be considered the bladder. So it's a closed
`8
`system and when you fill it, the innertube
`9
`expands until it hits the jacket and then it
`10
`becomes more rigid as a whole.
`11
` Q. Once you expand it to where you want it
`12
`to be, do you maintain, then, that level?
`13
` A. Yes.
`14
` Q. Any other analogous work?
`15
` A. I've done some work that involves pilot
`16
`valves. In particular it's the gas line going
`17
`into residences. So I gained familiarity with
`18
`some pilot valves, pneumatic pilot valves that
`19 way. I've worked on -- are you familiar with
`20
`SodaStream?
`21
` Q. Sounds familiar.
`22
` A. So I didn't work on SodaStream, but a
`23
`similar product where there is a nozzle that
`24
`clicks in and it fills with gas to carbonate
`25
`liquid.
`
`Page 11
`
`1
` Then I also worked on a valve case,
`2 which is a quick connect poppet valve for a
`3
`fracking tanker that's pressurized. With that
`4
`one there was a poppet in there. In the end,
`5
`the valve was taken apart and our analysis
`6
`showed that it was not the appropriate poppet
`7
`inside.
`8
` Q. Did that involve a valve enclosure
`9
`assembly at all?
`10
` MR. HARE: Objection, form.
`11
` THE WITNESS: That particular valve was
`12
`a quick connect valve.
`13
`BY MS. NATH:
`14
` Q. So it wasn't enclosed in anything?
`15
` A. No. It was itself.
`16
` Q. What about the pneumatic pilot valves,
`17
`did they relate to valves that were enclosed in
`18
`anything?
`19
` A. No. Those valves are on outsides of
`20
`houses.
`21
` Q. Are there valves in relation to this
`22
`expandable innertube?
`23
` A. Yes.
`24
` Q. Are those enclosed in anything?
`25
` A. That system -- so the product itself
`
`Page 12
`1
`does not have computer controlled valves in it,
`2
`but the setup that I constructed and designed
`3
`uses solenoid valves and manifolds and pressure
`4
`transducers.
`5
` Q. So the actual product doesn't use them
`6
`but the test apparatus that you used does use
`7
`them?
`8
` A. That's right. I was retained to test
`9
`these products.
`10
` Q. When did your work on the pneumatic
`11
`pilot valves take place?
`12
` A. That was probably in 2010.
`13
` Q. And how about the SodaStream type
`14
`product?
`15
` A. Probably 2013 or 2014.
`16
` Q. And then the quick connect valve case
`17 with the fracking?
`18
` A. That was more recent. Maybe 2016 or
`19
`2017.
`20
` Q. So you have an understanding that the
`21
`patent -- excuse me. Luke likes to tell me what
`22
`to say.
`23
` Is there any other analogous work that
`24 we haven't talked about?
`25
` A. I know that I've worked in some other
`Page 13
`1
`projects that involved pneumatics. Oh, I did
`2
`assist a client with a tire inflater.
`3
` Q. A tire inflater like something that I
`4
`could have in my house, like the one you can own
`5
`yourself to inflate a car tire?
`6
` A. Yeah. It was basically like the size
`7
`of like a power drill and you could plug it into
`8
`your cigarette lighter and pull the trigger, and
`9
`the display shows the pressure that you're
`10
`trying to reach and it automatically shuts off
`11 when you're finished.
`12
` Q. Are there valves in that product?
`13
` A. There is a stem check valve in the
`14
`chuck.
`15
` Q. Does the check valve relate at all to
`16 whether air is flowing into the tire or not?
`17
` A. Yeah. So the chuck has the stem in it,
`18
`and that stem has to push on the stem of your
`19
`tire to open it.
`20
` Q. Anything else that's analogous?
`21
` A. Yes. I also did a case examining the
`22
`failures of collets. A collet is basically --
`23
`if you're familiar with a finger trap that the
`24
`kids play with. So imagine instead of fingers
`25
`getting caught together, it's a quick way of
`4 (Pages 10 to 13)
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2067
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Page 14
`
`Page 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`connecting pipes and things.
` So suppose you want to put a hot water
`thing in line for like a coffee maker or
`something but you don't want to braze it
`together or whatever. You just take this thing
`and you shove one pipe in this side and one pipe
`in that side and it's got little fingers in it
`that keep everything together.
` Q. So how is that analogous to adjustable
`air mattresses?
` A. Well, the system that I developed to
`test that involved computer control of solenoid
`valves and pressurizing one part instead of the
`other and taking a pressurized source using a
`pump and filling it. It didn't have a bladder,
`but it goes to my experience with pneumatics and
`hydraulics.
` Q. Did it involve measuring the pressure?
` A. Yes. Yes, I had a pressure measurement
`on that.
` Q. Your test did?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Why were you measuring pressure for
`this finger-like trap object?
` MR. HARE: Objection, form.
`
`Page 15
`1
` THE WITNESS: So I was measuring
`2
`pressure in the system. This wasn't
`3
`particularly to measure the exact pressure in
`4
`each of these collets, but as part of the
`5
`project in terms of where they were situated in
`6
`the field when they failed, I needed to have an
`7
`idea of what we were pressurizing them to.
`8
`BY MS. NATH:
`9
` Q. Anything else that you believe is
`10
`analogous to adjustable air mattresses?
`11
` A. Well, I'm just giving you my
`12
`experiences in pneumatics and things like that.
`13
`I've worked on a number of other product cases
`14 where I used air power and pressure and valves
`15
`to do it. There is just a smattering of things
`16
`all over the place.
`17
` Q. When we were talking about the
`18
`innertube project, what did you mean when you
`19
`said closed systems?
`20
` A. So the innertube and the jacket, it was
`21
`like -- if you want to think of it as a
`22
`cul-de-sac. The fluid comes in from one side
`23
`and hits a dead end and then the whole thing
`24
`starts to fill.
`25
` Q. So the fluid comes in from one end of
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`the tube?
` A. That's right.
` Q. And then it hits an end of the tube and
`then does what?
` A. And then it begins pressurizing. So
`it's not an open channel all the way through and
`it doesn't continue on going somewhere else.
` Q. So the pressurized fluid remains in the
`innertube?
` A. That's right.
` Q. For what purpose?
` A. To pressurize it.
` Q. Is there something that's done with the
`pressurized fluid once it's pressurized?
` A. Yes. It's held there for a time and
`then after that time is up, then it's drained.
` Q. Do you have an understanding that the
`'172 patent was filed in July of 1997?
` A. That sounds right, to my recollection.
` Q. You can look on page 6 of your report
`if you want to confirm.
` A. Yes, that's what it says on page 6.
` Q. So at the time that this patent was
`filed, you had just graduated from Marquette,
`correct?
`
`Page 17
`
`1
` A. Yes, that's right.
`2
` Q. You would have graduated in May
`3
`of 1997, approximately?
`4
` A. Yeah, approximately.
`5
` Q. And you had a Bachelor of Science in
`6 mechanical engineering?
`7
` A. That's right.
`8
` Q. Did you have any experience at the
`9
`time?
`10
` A. I did, actually.
`11
` MR. HARE: Objection to form.
`12
`BY MS. NATH:
`13
` Q. And what was the experience at the
`14
`time?
`15
` A. So I had a year-long design project
`16 with a team of people and we built a computer
`17
`controlled vacuum cleaner that ran on a 286
`18 motherboard and had sensors that would control
`19
`the vacuum cleaner.
`20
` Q. It's something that you worked on while
`21
`you were in school, is that right?
`22
` A. That's right. And while we worked on
`23
`it, we reached out to a number of vacuum cleaner
`24
`companies and we ended up making a contact with
`25 Hoover, who gave us a number of -- they gave us
`5 (Pages 14 to 17)
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2067
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 5
`
`

`

`Page 18
`1
`a number of parts and pieces for our product and
`2 we ended up building a functional one.
`3
` Q. How many people did you work on this
`4
`project with?
`5
` A. There were three others.
`6
` Q. How much time would you say you spent
`7
`on a weekly basis on this design project over
`8
`the course of the year?
`9
` A. So this was in 1994, '93. We
`10
`probably -- at the beginning we probably put on
`11
`average, you know, four to eight hours a week
`12
`into it and then I think near the culmination of
`13
`it, the second semester when we had to build it
`14
`and paint it and test its operation, how the
`15
`sensors worked, I think then we probably spent
`16
`probably 20 hours each per week.
`17
` Q. So in July 1997 you didn't have any
`18
`experience with adjustable air mattresses by
`19
`that time, correct?
`20
` A. Not with adjustable air mattresses, but
`21
`I had familiarity with computer control and
`22
`pneumatic principles.
`23
` Q. And is that based on this one-year
`24
`design project?
`25
` A. Well, that and, you know, as an
`
`Page 19
`1
`undergraduate you're exposed to fluid dynamics
`2
`courses and things like that.
`3
` Q. Courses, but your actual work
`4
`experience or internships, did you have anything
`5
`relating to what you just said, which was --
`6
`excuse me, sorry.
`7
` MS. NATH: Can you tell me what his
`8
`last answer was?
`9
` (Record read as requested.)
`10
`BY MS. NATH:
`11
` Q. So I'll ask the question again. So
`12
`other than your coursework, did you have any
`13
`experience with pneumatic principles at the time
`14
`in July 1997?
`15
` MR. HARE: Objection to form.
`16
` THE WITNESS: So in terms of college,
`17
`no. It was just the vacuum cleaner project and
`18 my coursework.
`19
`BY MS. NATH:
`20
` Q. Did you have any experience with pumps
`21
`in July 1997?
`22
` MR. HARE: Objection to form.
`23
` THE WITNESS: Yeah. Growing up I was a
`24
`hobby -- model-making hobbyist and I had an air
`25
`compressor that I used to paint with.
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Page 20
`
`1
`BY MS. NATH:
`2
` Q. So you used an air compressor?
`3
` A. That's right.
`4
` Q. Did you have any experience working
`5 with valves in July 1997?
`6
` MR. HARE: Objection to form.
`7
` THE WITNESS: I'm trying to recall.
`8
`It's a long time ago. I'm not sure.
`9
`BY MS. NATH:
`10
` Q. Let me ask it this way. So other than
`11
`your one-year design project and the use of an
`12
`air compressor, did you have any other
`13
`experience, work experience relating to
`14
`engineering at the time?
`15
` A. So I was hired by the physics
`16
`department to teach physics to undergrads as a
`17
`junior, so from junior to senior year I taught
`18
`between one and four sections a week of
`19
`undergraduate physics. Those are lab courses,
`20
`and I don't remember off the top of my head what
`21 we did in those courses with fluids. I can't
`22
`think of anything right now.
`23
` Q. Had you done any work with solenoids by
`24
`July 1997?
`25
` A. I don't remember.
`
`Page 21
`
`1
` Q. What about pressure sensors?
`2
` MR. HARE: Objection, form.
`3
`BY MS. NATH:
`4
` Q. In July 1997?
`5
` A. I'm pretty sure that we used those in
`6
`coursework, but it was a long time ago.
`7
` Q. Do you know of the problems facing the
`8
`adjustable air mattress industry in July 1997?
`9
` MR. HARE: Objection, foundation.
`10
` THE WITNESS: I understand what the
`11
`problems were based on what Gifft explained and
`12
`Shafer explained in their introductions.
`13
`BY MS. NATH:
`14
` Q. Can you tell me what those problems
`15 were?
`16
` A. As I recall, I believe heating and
`17
`seals were an issue. I think that that's
`18
`something that Gifft discussed.
`19
` Q. Anything else?
`20
` A. Yeah, I don't recall without seeing it
`21
`in front of me.
`22
` Q. And there is no other source of your
`23
`knowledge of problems for the air mattress
`24
`industry in 1997 other than Gifft and Shafer?
`25
` A. No. For the air mattress industry, no,
`6 (Pages 18 to 21)
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2067
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 6
`
`

`

`Page 24
`1 with the computer. That allows you to monitor
`2 what's happening in the test. So usually these
`3
`systems -- like I mentioned the collet one. We
`4 were monitoring pressure which had a computer
`5
`there with the readout. Same thing for these
`6
`flexible innertube tests.
`7
` Q. You've served as an expert in other
`8
`proceedings, correct?
`9
` A. That's right.
`10
` Q. And have you ever served as an expert
`11
`relating to adjustable air mattresses or bed
`12
`systems?
`13
` A. No.
`14
` Q. Any expert experience relating to
`15
`inflatable devices?
`16
` A. Yes. So I've been retained to work in
`17
`these product cases that we have talked about
`18
`already.
`19
` Q. So when you were talking to me about
`20
`the innertube, for example, the innertube
`21
`product, that was as an expert?
`22
` A. Well, do you mean like in a legal
`23
`proceeding?
`24
` Q. Correct.
`25
` A. I was a consulting expert.
`
`Page 25
`
`Page 22
`1
`but for valves as a whole you can look to the
`2
`Power Transmission Handbook and see what sorts
`3
`of valves they had in there, and if you look at
`4
`the one from a year or two ago, that section has
`5
`largely remained completely identical to what it
`6 was in 1993.
`7
` Q. 1993 or 1997?
`8
` A. 1993 is when the Power Transmission
`9 Handbook that I used as an exhibit for my
`10
`report, that's when that was published.
`11
` Q. And you went back and looked at the
`12
`1993 version of the book?
`13
` A. That's right. That's the exhibits that
`14 we attached to my report.
`15
` Q. So do you know of the problems facing
`16
`pneumatic systems in July 1997?
`17
` MR. HARE: Objection to form.
`18
` THE WITNESS: As I just discussed, the
`19
`primary ones that I believe Gifft was trying to
`20
`overcome were solenoids overheating and leaks
`21
`developing in the valves. And also Shafer
`22
`addressed noisy air pumps.
`23
`BY MS. NATH:
`24
` Q. If you look at paragraph 3 of your
`25
`report, it starts on page 4, the second to last
`Page 23
`1
`line talks about development of a hydraulic test
`2
`bed.
`3
` Can you tell me what that is?
`4
` A. Yeah. So that's the flexible innertube
`5 with the jacket. That's what I'm talking about
`6
`there. And that also describes the test setup
`7
`that I made for the collet.
`8
` Q. So what is a hydraulic test bed?
`9
` A. So that's just -- a test setup, test
`10
`bed, I would use those interchangeably.
`11 Hydraulic, because I was forcing water into the
`12
`innertubes.
`13
` Q. So when you use the word "bed" in
`14
`paragraph 3, it's not actually a bed that you
`15 would sleep on; it's the term that you were
`16
`using to describe your test setup system?
`17
` A. That's correct.
`18
` Q. And what is the next item that you've
`19
`listed, computer control system that was used to
`20
`fill and relieve flexible/expandable client
`21
`devices?
`22
` A. Yeah. So that goes along with that
`23
`same thing. Also more generically, I do a lot
`24
`of work where I use sensors to monitor
`25
`computer -- you know, you interface the sensor
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Q. In a legal proceeding?
` A. I think that there was an offshoot
`eventually that was litigation, but I was not
`involved in that. I only consulted with them.
`The other one that I mentioned with the collets,
`that was litigation.
` Q. Did you testify in the collets matter?
` A. No.
` Q. Did you submit an expert report?
` MR. HARE: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: No, I did not.
`BY MS. NATH:
` Q. Do you know how many times you've
`served as an expert in relation to legal
`proceedings?
` A. I could only speculate.
` Q. Do you know if it's more than ten?
` A. I've been retained more than ten times,
`yes.
` Q. Is it more than 30?
` A. Probably.
` Q. More than 50?
` A. Probably. I've been doing consulting
`for about 11 and a half years now.
` Q. What percentage of your work is expert
`7 (Pages 22 to 25)
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2067
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 7
`
`

`

`Page 26
`
`Page 28
`
`1 work in these legal proceedings?
`2
` A. Being retained for litigation matters
`3
`versus consulting work for product development
`4
`or product failures where there is not
`5
`litigation, I don't keep track of it, but if I
`6
`had to guess I would probably say it varies year
`7
`to year. So some years I could be doing
`8
`litigation 40 percent, some years it could be
`9
`60 percent, but it's usually somewhere around
`10
`there.
`11
` Q. Have you served as an expert on other
`12
`patent cases before?
`13
` A. I have.
`14
` Q. Do you know about how many?
`15
` A. I've worked in a number. I've been
`16
`deposed in one.
`17
` Q. Any testimony in any patent cases?
`18
` A. Yeah, just that one.
`19
` Q. So in the one you were deposed, did you
`20
`give any trial testimony or hearing testimony?
`21
` A. It was just deposition.
`22
` Q. But you have given live hearing or
`23
`trial testimony as an expert?
`24
` A. Yes. I was a fact witness.
`25
` Q. You were a fact witness in a legal
`
`Page 27
`
`1
`Commission. I don't believe that I've had
`2
`communication with any experts in that.
`3
` Q. Have you had communications with any
`4
`other experts in these proceedings?
`5
` A. So Josh Phinney is a colleague of mine,
`6
`but I have not discussed the substance of
`7
`this --
`8
` MR. HARE: Objection, form.
`9
` THE WITNESS: -- with him. He is part
`10
`of the technical review process that Exponent
`11
`has, and so in that regard he has reviewed what
`12
`I've written, but I've not reviewed his work.
`13
`BY MS. NATH:
`14
` Q. When were you hired in this case to
`15
`serve as an expert?
`16
` A. Sometime in 2018.
`17
` Q. Do you know if it was the early or
`18
`later part of the year?
`19
` A. I don't recall. The original contact
`20 was made with Joe Rakow, I believe, and then I
`21
`became involved.
`22
` Q. You don't remember if you were on the
`23
`beach or if it was snowing?
`24
` A. No idea. No idea.
`25
` Q. Do you know how much time you spent on
`Page 29
`
`1
`proceeding?
`2
` A. Yes.
`3
` Q. Is that the only time that you gave
`4
`live testimony in a hearing or a trial?
`5
` A. That's right.
`6
` Q. So you've never given live testimony as
`7
`an expert outside of a deposition?
`8
` A. Except for that, when I was a fact
`9 witness. That was a bench trial.
`10
` Q. So you were a fact witness. What did
`11
`that case relate to?
`12
` A. Modifications to a golf cart.
`13
` Q. But you weren't retained as an expert?
`14
` A. That's right. I assisted the person
`15 who was retained as an expert.
`16
` Q. Were you asked to be an expert for the
`17
`Sleep Number versus ANM International Trade
`18
`Commission case?
`19
` MR. HARE: Objection, foundation.
`20
` THE WITNESS: No.
`21
`BY MS. NATH:
`22
` Q. Have you had any communications with
`23
`any experts in the ITC case? Do you know what I
`24 mean when I say ITC?
`25
` A. That's the International Trade
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`the case to date, approximately?
` A. To date, I would say -- I would have to
`guess. It's over 100 hours, but I believe less
`than 150. I'm not counting the deposition prep
`from the last week, though.
` Q. Do you know about how much you've been
`paid to date?
` A. I have no idea. I don't know how much
`Exponent has been paid. I should clarify that.
` (Whereupon, Giachetti Deposition
` Exhibit No. 3 was marked for
` identification.)
`BY MS. NATH:
` Q. Have you had any communications with
`someone named Dr. Friis?
` A. Not that I recall.
` MR. HARE: Objection, foundation.
`BY MS. NATH:
` Q. Have you reviewed any reports written
`by an expert named Dr. Friis?
` A. No.
` Q. I've given you what has been marked as
`Exhibit 3.
` Do you recognize this document?
` A. It looks like the -- well, based on the
`8 (Pages 26 to 29)
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2067
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 8
`
`

`

`Page 30
`
`Page 32
`
`1
`title page it looks like the petition for the
`2
`IPR.
`3
` Q. And have you reviewed this IPR petition
`4
`in this case?
`5
` A. Yeah, I've seen it before.
`6
` Q. Were you involved in drafting it?
`7
` A. No.
`8
` Q. Do you understand your declaration is
`9
`attached as an exhibit to this petition?
`10
` A. I do.
`11
` Q. And your declaration is cited in the
`12
`petition for support?
`13
` A. Yes, I understand that.
`14
` Q. Did you review the petition in
`15
`preparation for the deposition?
`16
` A. I did.
`17
` Q. Do you agree with its contents?
`18
` A. I only reviewed it to make sure that I
`19
`saw what it said. I didn't really assign
`20
`agreement or disagreement.
`21
` Q. So while you were reading it, you
`22
`didn't -- if you saw something that you didn't
`23
`agree with, you wouldn't have noticed that?
`24
` A. I was just really looking for parts
`25 where my report was called out because I wanted
`Page 31
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`has an expert named Dr. Messner?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And have you reviewed his declaration
`in this matter?
` A. I have.
` Q. Have you reviewed the patent owner's
`preliminary response in this matter?
` A. I believe I did. I believe I did.
` Q. Sometime before this deposition?
` A. Yes.
` Q. In preparation for the deposition?
` A. I believe I reviewed that document and
`then issued -- if it's the document that I'm
`thinking of, I reviewed that and then issued a
`supplementary response.
` Q. You had mentioned Dr. Phinney
`previously. Are you aware that there are
`related inter partes review proceedings in
`relation to two different patents, the '747
`patent and the '154 patent?
` A. I'm aware that those exist, but I don't
`know the topics that he's working on outside
`that it's related to control in some way.
` Q. So have you reviewed any materials
`relating to those proceedings?
`
`Page 33
`
`1
`to make sure that -- I'm here to discuss my
`2
`report, which is where all my science is. So
`3
`the way I understand it, it works, is I provide
`4
`the attorneys the science through my report and
`5
`how they choose to use it with their expert
`6
`knowledge of the legal system, which I do not
`7
`have, that's their area.
`8
` Q. So when you were looking for parts
`9 where your report was called out, did you do any
`10
`review of whether the petition accurately
`11
`characterized your opinions?
`12
` A. Yeah, I didn't read it terribly
`13
`closely. I just wanted to have a real flavor
`14
`for what was there and I would refer all my
`15
`opinions to be contained in that report.
`16
` Q. You would refer all your opinions to be
`17
`contained in your report, is that what you said?
`18
` A. Yeah.
`19
` Q. And you understand that the board in
`20
`this matter issued a decision in the case
`21
`instituting the proceedings, correct?
`22
` A. Yes.
`23
` Q. Did you review that document?
`24
` A. I did.
`25
` Q. And do you understand that Sleep Number
`
`1
` A. I skimmed through his deposition
`2
`transcript, but as far as trying to comprehend
`3
`or dig into the technical material, I didn't do
`4
`any of that.
`5
` Q. So you didn't read his report, but you
`6
`did review his deposition transcript from those
`7
`proceedings?
`8
` A. I think "review" is more in depth than
`9 what I did. I literally just skimmed through in
`10
`less than a half hour or something. It was
`11
`pretty lengthy.
`12
` Q. Have you had communications with any
`13
`other individuals in relation to those
`14
`proceedings?
`15
` A. The attorneys and I briefly touched
`16
`upon it during

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket