throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SELECT COMFORT CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`Case No. IPR2019-00514
`Patent No. 5,904,172
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF CARL G. DEGEN
`IN SUPPORT OF PATENT OWNER’S RESPONSE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 1
`
`

`

`
`
`I, Carl G. Degen, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am over the age of 21 years and am fully competent to make this
`
`Declaration. I make the following statements based on personal knowledge and, if
`
`called to testify to them, could and would do so.
`
`2.
`
`I received my Bachelor’s of Science Degree in Mathematics and
`
`Economics from the University of Wisconsin–Parkside in Kenosha, Wisconsin in
`
`1977. I then completed all but my dissertation toward a Ph.D. in Economics at the
`
`University of Wisconsin–Madison in 1980.
`
`3.
`
`I am currently employed at Laurits R. Christensen Associates, Inc. in
`
`Madison, Wisconsin, where I have worked since 1980. I started my employment as
`
`an Economist in 1980, and advanced numerous times to my current role as President,
`
`which I have held since 2005. I was previously an Economics Teaching Assistant
`
`from 1977 to 1978 and an Economics Research Assistant from 1978 to 1980 at the
`
`University of Wisconsin–Madison. I was also the Vice President of the Wisconsin
`
`Business Economics Association from 1983 to 1984.
`
`4.
`
`I have testified in numerous litigations involving intellectual property
`
`and other business disputes, and in postal and energy rate cases. Since joining Laurits
`
`R. Christensen Associates, Inc., I have worked extensively on projects for the U.S.
`
`Postal Service including productivity measurement, cost measurement, product cost
`
`1
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 2
`
`

`

`
`
`models, and regulatory reform. I have also worked on projects in the energy and
`
`railroad industries. I have authored papers and written regulatory testimony.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`A copy of my current CV is attached as Appendix A.
`
`I have been retained by Fox Rothschild LLP, counsel for Sleep Number
`
`Corporation, formerly known as Select Comfort Corporation (“Sleep Number”), to
`
`analyze certain unit sales data produced in this inter partes review (“IPR”)
`
`proceeding by Petitioner American National Manufacturing, Inc. (“ANM”). None
`
`of my opinions are contingent on any result or payment of my fees.
`
`Understanding of the Law
`
`7.
`
`I am not a lawyer and do not offer legal opinions. However, I do have
`
`an understanding of certain legal concepts as relevant to my work and my analysis
`
`in this case.
`
`8.
`
`I understand that there are various secondary indicia of non-
`
`obviousness (sometimes called “secondary considerations”) that a patent owner may
`
`argue support a finding of patentability. I understand one such secondary
`
`consideration is commercial success, which I understand to relate to economic
`
`considerations regarding the products at issue. I understand one relevant
`
`consideration of commercial success is demand for the patented technologies, which
`
`can relate to the amount of sales of products that include the patented technologies,
`
`the sales trends of these products, and the market’s purchasing behavior regarding
`
`2
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 3
`
`

`

`
`
`these products. I understand another relevant consideration of commercial success
`
`is adoption of the patented technologies, which I understand to relate to the extent
`
`to which patented technologies displace non-patented technologies in relevant
`
`segments of the market.
`
`9. My opinions and analyses are based on the data and evidence currently
`
`available. If additional evidence or clarifying information is provided, I reserve the
`
`right to consider its impact, if any, on my opinions and analyses and amend this
`
`declaration if appropriate.
`
`Background
`
`10.
`
`I have reviewed Sleep Number’s Amended Disclosure of Asserted
`
`Claims and Infringement Contentions against ANM, which is Exhibit 2070. I
`
`understand that these exhibits disclose ANM’s air bed systems, including names of
`
`air controllers that Sleep Number has accused in an underlying district court case.
`
`11.
`
`It is my understanding that ANM petitioned the United States Patent
`
`and Trademark Office for IPR on three Sleep Number Patents: U.S. Patent No.
`
`5,904,172 (“the ‘172 Patent”); U.S. Patent No. 9,737,154 (“the ‘154 Patent”); and
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,769,747 (“the ‘747 Patent”); and that IPR has been instituted on
`
`each Patent. I understand that infringement is not an issue in this IPR, but I use the
`
`term “accused” throughout this declaration for ease of reference and because that is
`
`the term ANM used in its production of its unit sales data discussed below.
`
`3
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 4
`
`

`

`
`
`12.
`
`I have reviewed a document produced by ANM in the underlying
`
`district court case with the bates number ANMI00133414–22, which I understand is
`
`Exhibit 2077. I understand that Exhibit 2077 includes the names of air controllers
`
`ANM sold between the years 1998 and 2018 and includes a timeline at
`
`ANMI00133414 depicting when ANM sold each air controller. My analysis focuses
`
`on what ANM refers to as the Gen 2 V4, Gen 3 V1, and Gen 3 V2 air controllers. I
`
`understand that the timeline and the subsequent pages provide information regarding
`
`the “Manifold” and “Software” (ANM’s terms used in Exhibit 2077) included in
`
`these air controllers. This is relevant to my analysis as explained below.
`
`13. Exhibit 2077 (at ANMI00133414 and ANMI00133420) shows that
`
`ANM sold the Gen 2 V4 air controller (which included an “Arco/Rimco” manifold
`
`and “Arco, Target system”1 Software) from August 2012 through approximately
`
`December 2014. Exhibit 2077 (at ANMI00133414 and ANMI00133421) shows that
`
`ANM sold the Gen 3 V1 air controller (which included an “Arco/Rimco” manifold,
`
`
`1 Exhibit 2077 at ANMI00133420 indicates that ANM’s Gen 2 V4 air controller is
`
`the earliest air controller that ANM described as a “target pressure” controller.
`
`4
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 5
`
`

`

`
`
`and “Providence, Target system” Main version 1.5 – 1.82 and Remote version 1.8
`
`Software (identified collectively as “M1.5-1.8/R1.8” in Exhibit 2078)), from June
`
`25, 2014
`
`through August 2016. Exhibit 2077 (at ANMI00133414 and
`
`ANMI00133422) shows that ANM sold the Gen 3 V2 air controller (which included
`
`a “Koge” manifold3 and “Providence, Target system” Main versions 1.92, 1.97,4 2.0
`
`and Remote version 2.55 Software (identified collectively as “M1.92-2.0/R2.55” in
`
`Exhibit 2078)), from August 2016 onward.
`
`
`2 I see that Exhibit 2077 at ANMI00133414 refers only to a version 1.8 but that
`
`Exhibit 2077 at ANMI00133421 refers to a version 1.5 – 1.8. I understand from
`
`Sleep Number’s counsel that Sleep Number has inspected and accused version 1.8.
`
`3 Based on conversation with counsel and the bullet-point description in Exhibit
`
`2077 at ANMI00133422, I understand that the Gen 3 V2 air controller included a
`
`Koge manifold, not an Arco/Rimco manifold as is indicated elsewhere on
`
`ANMI00133422 (presumably inadvertently).
`
`4 Exhibit 2077 at ANMI00133414 does not include reference to a version 1.97, but
`
`my analyses would be the same had it been incorporated at any period of time when
`
`ANMI00133414 notes version 2.0 was incorporated because I understand Sleep
`
`Number asserts both as reading on its ‘154 Patent and ‘747 Patent.
`
`5
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 6
`
`

`

`
`
`14.
`
`I understand that Sleep Number has asserted that air beds sold with
`
`ANM’s air controllers that include at least an Arco, Koge, or Medisphere “manifold”
`
`(which I understand Sleep Number refers to as the enclosure of the valve enclosure
`
`assembly) supported by the corresponding source code versions noted in Exhibit
`
`2077 read on its ‘172 Patent. I also understand that Sleep Number has asserted that
`
`air beds sold with ANM’s air controllers that include at least Software (i.e. source
`
`code) versions 1.8, 1.97, and 2.0 read on its ‘154 Patent and ‘747 Patent.
`
`15.
`
`I have also reviewed the Declarations of John Abraham and George
`
`Edwards, which are Exhibits 2041 and 2054, which I also relied upon in gleaning
`
`the foregoing information.
`
`Unit Data Analyses
`
`16.
`
`I understand that, on October 15, 2019, ANM produced a native excel
`
`document titled “IPR 8” in this IPR, which purports to provide unit sales data for
`
`ANM’s sales of consumer and medical beds for the time period March 2004 to
`
`September 2019. These data include only units for ANM’s identified sales. These
`
`data do not include revenues, prices, expenses, or profits regarding ANM’s identified
`
`sales, which, if made available to me in Excel format, may provide further evidence
`
`of the commercial success of ANM’s products achieved as a result of incorporating
`
`the technologies from Sleep Number’s ‘172 Patent, ‘154 Patent, and ‘747 Patent. I
`
`understand that a portion of “IPR 8” is being filed as Exhibit 2078. Specifically, I
`
`6
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 7
`
`

`

`
`
`understand that Exhibit 2078 consists of a PDF of the tab titled “Raw Data,” which
`
`is the tab containing the data that I analyzed, sorted by Month lowest to highest
`
`(Column B).
`
`17.
`
`I analyzed ANM’s “Raw Data” by filtering various columns of
`
`information and running various pivot tables. Specifically, my analyses consider the
`
`“Month” of each sale in Column B, the “Inner Co” sales (i.e. inter-company sales)
`
`and “3rd Party” sales (i.e. sales to third parties) in Column D, the “Description” of
`
`the product being sold in Column F, the number of “Units Sold” for each such
`
`product in Column H, whether the product was a “Medical” or “Consumer” product
`
`in Column I, whether the product sold included a “Manifold” listed in Column K
`
`that has been accused by Sleep Number, and/or whether the product sold included
`
`“Software” (source code) listed in Column L that has been accused by Sleep
`
`Number. Column K includes the following five options for “Manifold” – Arco,
`
`Koge, Medisphere, N/A, 5 and Sun/Wok. I understand that Sleep Number has
`
`asserted that at least the Arco, Koge, and Medisphere manifolds (supported by the
`
`corresponding source code versions noted in Exhibit 2077) read on Sleep Number’s
`
`‘172 Patent. Column L includes eight options for “Software” – Arco, Arco Target,
`
`
`5 I understand that “N/A” refers to a product not sold with an accused “Manifold.”
`
`7
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 8
`
`

`

`
`
`M1.5-1/8.R1.8, M1.92-2.0/R2.55, Medisphere, N/A, 6 Sizewise, and Sun/Wok. I
`
`understand that Sleep Number has asserted that at least source code versions 1.8,
`
`1.97, and 2.0 read on its ‘154 Patent and ‘747 Patent.
`
`18. My analyses address two questions: 1) Did ANM’s use/changes
`
`regarding technologies that Sleep Number asserts read on Sleep Number’s ‘172
`
`Patent, ‘154 Patent, and ‘747 Patent impact ANM’s average monthly unit sales of
`
`accused pumps/air controllers; and 2) What was ANM’s adoption rate of the
`
`manifolds/source code that Sleep Number asserts read on Sleep Number’s ‘172
`
`Patent, ‘154 Patent, and ‘747 Patent compared to the sales of mattresses identified
`
`by ANM as accused in Column M of its “Raw Data” (Exhibit 2078).
`
`Impact from ANM’s Changes in Manifold and/or Software
`
`19. Because ANM’s first offering of a “target pressure” air controller was
`
`in August 2012, I begin my analyses of ANM’s unit sales data from Exhibit 2078 in
`
`August 2012 and conduct the analyses over four periods of time: (1) August 2012
`
`through June 2014 (“Period 1”), (2) July 2014 through July 2016 (“Period 2”), (3)
`
`August 2016 through August 2017 (“Period 3”), and (4) September 2017 through
`
`
`6 I understand that “N/A” refers to a product not sold with an accused “Software.”
`
`8
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 9
`
`

`

`
`
`September 2019 (“Period 4”).7 Period 1 reflects the time frame that ANM sold the
`
`Gen 2 V4 air controller with an Arco/Rimco manifold asserted to read on Sleep
`
`Number’s ‘172 Patent. Period 2 reflects the time frame that ANM sold the Gen 3 V1
`
`air controller with an Arco/Rimco manifold asserted to read on Sleep Number’s ‘172
`
`Patent; and with source code version M1.5-1.8/R1.8 asserted to read on Sleep
`
`Number’s ‘154 Patent and ‘747 Patent. Period 3 reflects the time frame that ANM
`
`sold the Gen 3 V2 air controller with a Koge manifold asserted to read on Sleep
`
`Number’s ‘172 Patent; and with source code versions 1.9 and 1.92 not asserted to
`
`read on Sleep Number’s ‘154 Patent or ‘747 Patent. Period 4 reflects the time frame
`
`that ANM sold the Gen 3 V2 air controller with a Koge manifold asserted to read on
`
`Sleep Number’s ‘172 Patent; and with source code version 2.0 asserted to read on
`
`Sleep Number’s ‘154 Patent and ‘747 Patent.8
`
`
`7 I understand from the Declaration of Elizabeth Patton, Exhibit 2058, that, prior to
`
`2012, unit sales to consumers would have been subject to a non-compete agreement
`
`between parties in this IPR. Therefore, I do not include this time period in my
`
`analyses.
`
`8 To the extent that ANM’s source code version 1.97 was implemented during a
`
`portion of Period 4, I understand that Sleep Number has asserted this source code
`
`version also reads on Sleep Number’s ‘154 Patent and ‘747 Patent.
`
`9
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 10
`
`

`

`
`
`20. My analyses identify unit sales of ANM’s accused pumps/air
`
`controllers as products containing variants of “pump” or “controller” in the
`
`“Description” in Column F of Exhibit 2078 and have a “Manifold” asserted to read
`
`on Sleep Number’s ‘172 Patent in column K and/or have a “Software” (i.e. source
`
`code version) asserted to read on Sleep Number’s ‘154 Patent or ‘747 Patent in
`
`column L of Exhibit 2078. Attached as Appendix B is a chart showing ANM’s
`
`monthly unit sales of pumps/air controllers that include a manifold and/or source
`
`code that I understand is asserted to read on Sleep Number’s ‘172 Patent, ‘154
`
`Patent, and/or ‘747 Patent (“accused pumps/air controllers”). The three vertical lines
`
`indicate the transitions between the Periods described above. The four horizontal
`
`lines indicate ANM’s average monthly unit sales during each Period. ANM’s
`
`average monthly unit sales of accused pumps/air controllers by Period are shown in
`
`Table 1 below:
`
`21.
`
`I statistically tested ANM’s mean unit sales of accused pumps/air
`
`controllers for each Period to the mean(s) of ANM’s unit sales of accused pumps/air
`
`controllers in adjacent Period(s) to determine if ANM’s average monthly unit sales
`
`of accused pumps/air controllers was statistically different between the compared
`
`10
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 11
`
`

`

`
`
`Periods. Appendix C shows the results of my statistical analyses generated by this
`
`testing in the form of the log file exported by the STATA software used to perform
`
`these analyses.
`
`22.
`
`I understand that ANM’s product changes between Period 1 and Period
`
`2 include a change from ANM’s Arco Target source code not asserted to read on
`
`Sleep Number’s ‘154 Patent and ‘747 Patent to ANM’s version 1.8 source code
`
`asserted to read on Sleep Number’s ‘154 Patent and ‘747 Patent.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`23.
`
`I understand that ANM’s product changes between Period 2 and Period
`
`3 include a change from source code asserted to read on Sleep Number’s ‘154 Patent,
`
`and ‘747 Patent (version 1.8) to source code not asserted to read on Sleep Number’s
`
`‘154 Patent or ‘747 Patent (versions 1.9 and 1.92). I understand that ANM’s accused
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 12
`
`

`

`
`
`pumps/air controllers also changed at this time from an Arco/Rimco manifold to a
`
`Koge manifold—both of which are asserted to read on Sleep Number’s ‘172 Patent.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`24.
`
`I understand that ANM’s product changes between Period 3 and Period
`
`4 include a change from source code not asserted to read on Sleep Number’s ‘154
`
`Patent and ‘747 Patent (versions 1.9 and 1.92) to source code asserted to read on
`
`Sleep Number’s ‘154 Patent and ‘747 Patent (version 2.0 and version 1.97 to the
`
`extent it was implemented).
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 13
`
`

`

`
`
`25.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` I understand that the demand
`
`
`
` is a relevant factor to
`
`consider regarding commercial success of ANM’s accused pumps/air controllers.
`
`ANM’s Adoption of Accused Manifolds and Source Code
`
`26.
`
`I also understand that evidence of ANM’s adoption of the technologies
`
`asserted to read on Sleep Number’s ‘172 Patent, ‘154 Patent, and ‘747 Patent in its
`
`pumps/air controllers is another relevant consideration regarding commercial
`
`success. I measured ANM’s adoption of accused technologies by comparing its sales
`
`of accused pumps/air controllers (as defined above) to its sales of accused mattresses
`
`13
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 14
`
`

`

`
`
`(defined as those identified as “Accused” by ANM in Exhibit 2078). 11
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` I understand that Sleep Number asserts that its ‘172 Patent,
`
`‘154 Patent, and ‘747 Patent cover an entire mattress system.
`
`14
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 15
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`p—L U1
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`|PR2019-00514
`
`Page 16
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 16
`
`

`

`
`
`27.
`\l
`
`
`
`28.
`N 00
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`16
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`|PR2019-00514
`
`Page 17
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 17
`
`

`

`
`
`Conclusions
`
`29. Based upon my analyses detailed above, I believe to a reasonable
`
`degree of certainty that there is clear evidence of commercial success based on:
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`30. These analyses demonstrate that demand for technologies that read on
`
`Sleep Number’s ‘172 Patent, ‘154 Patent, and ‘747 Patent exists.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`17
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 18
`
`

`

`
`
`31.
`U.) p—L
`
`
`
`18
`18
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`|PR2019-00514
`
`Page 19
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 19
`
`

`

`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and correct. Executed on October 29, 2019.
`
`19
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 20
`
`

`

`APPENDIX A
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 21
`
`

`

`Carl G. Degen
`
`Professional Papers:
`
`”Air Pollution and Mortality Rates: A Note on Lave and Seskin‘s Pooling of Cross-Section and Time Series
`Data,” Journal ofEnv/ronmental Economics and Management, Vol. 7, 1980, pp. 149—155 (with G. B.
`Christainson).
`
`”United States Postal Service Capital Stock Estimates, 1962—1982,” March 1983, (with D. C. Christensen,
`L. R. Christensen, and P. E. Schoech).
`
`”United States Postal Service Measures of Real Output, Input, and Total Factor Productivity 1963—
`1984,” October 1984, (with D. C. Christensen, L. R. Christensen, and P. E. Schoech).
`
`”United States Postal Service Econometric Analysis of USPS Structure of Production and Total Factor
`Productivity, 1963—1983,” November 1984, (with D. C. Christensen, L. R. Christensen, and P. E.
`Schoech)
`
`l’Data Base and Methodology for Economic Comparison of School Districts,” February 1985, (with D. C.
`Christensen).
`
`”Review of the Evidence for Urban/Rural Cost of Living Differentials in Wisconsin,” February 1985, (with
`D. C. Christensen).
`
`”The Role of Deregulation in Wisconsin's Economic Development,” presented to the Wisconsin Strategic
`Development Commission, April 1985, (with L. R. Christensen).
`
`”United States Postal Service Quarterly Real Output, input, and Total Factor Productivity, 1982 lst
`Quarter Through 1986 lst Quarter,” February 1986, (with D. C. Christensen, L. R. Christensen, and P. E.
`Schoech)
`
`”United States Postal Service Productivity Budgeting Model Users Manual,” June 1986.
`
`”Capital in the United States Postal Service,” in Technology and Capital Formation, 1989, eds. Dale W.
`Jorgenson and Ralph Landau, MIT Press, Cambridge, (with D. C. Christensen, L. R. Christensen, and P. E.
`Schoech)
`
`”Performance Analysis of Processing and Distribution Facilities: Sources of TFP Improvement,” February
`22, 1994, (with D. C. Christensen, K. L. Ehiinger, and P. E. Schoech).
`
`Regulatory Testimony
`
`Written supplemental direct testimony before the Postal Rate Commission, USPS—ST-12, in Docket No.
`R94—1, Postal Rate and Fee Changes (Reclassification of Second-Class Tallies).
`
`Written direct testimony before the Postal Rate Commission, USPS-T—S in Docket No. MC9S—1,
`Classification Reform i (Letter Bundle Handling Survey and First-Class Mail Characteristics Study).
`
`Written rebuttal testimony before the Postal Rate Commission, USPS—RT—9, in Docket No. MC95—1,
`Classification Reform-1 (Impact of Automation on First-Class Mail, The Impact of Postage Rates on
`Christmas Cards, and Alternative Volume Unit Cost Estimates for Publications).
`
`
`
` 2 Christensen Associates
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`
`Page 22
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 22
`
`

`

`Carl G. Degen
`
`Written direct testimony before the Postal Rate Commission, USPS—CT—Z, in Docket No. MC96—2,
`Classification Reform ll, Nonprofit (Classroom Mail).
`
`Written direct testimony before the Postal Rate Commission, USPS-T—lz, in Docket No. R97—1, Postal
`Rate and Fee Changes (New Costing Methods).
`
`Written rebuttal testimony before the Postal Rate Commission, USPS—RT—6, in Docket No. R97—1, Postal
`Rate and Fee Changes (New Costing Methods).
`
`Written direct testimony before the Postal Rate Commission, USPS—T—16, in Docket No. R2000—1,
`Postal Rate and Fee Changes (Mail Processing Costing Methods).
`
`Written rebuttal testimony before the Postal Rate Commission, USPS—RT—ES, in Docket No. RZOOO—l,
`
`Postal Rate and Fee Changes (Mail Processing Costing Methods and a Survey of Bound Printed Matter).
`
`Rebuttal Testimony of Mark E. Meitzen, Ph.D., Christensen Associates; Dennis L. Weisman, Ph.D.,
`
`Professor Emeritus, Kansas State University; and Carl G. Degen, Christensen Associates, Performance-
`Based Ratemaking Mechanism, on behalf of NSTAR Electric Company and Western Massachusetts
`Electric Company each d/b/a EVERSOURCE ENERGY, May 19, 2017.
`
` 3 Christensen Associates
`
`
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`|PR2019-00514
`
`Page 23
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 23
`
`

`

`
`COVER.Emfimm£0
`
`
`«0EtnaEmgtozJuEtna.mj
`
`Emcee
`
`
`
`*otrio533$Jo“2&5.mj
`
`223do6356:
`
`cmmm
`
`
`
`
`
`:2*0Hutumfi53mm;:65:35.mj
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5:30058::‘tzou£3265.389.;vs33m
`
`
`
`c0655c_um3<.3wa“B313.5Ewumm>>au“£me.34
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` :0..9>3cwwGEur—cuntshofiEwEEwummmJo“3.55.mj
`
`
`
`
`
`c2_EEwsuzomEmmiusbe8:3553me:5“2.55.m.:
`
`
`
`
`
`ucmEd8300ucmEmziuwcm==2.CmEWEOI
`
`
`
`53thwamEsmEcmumx
`
`m9
`
`32.33*0#an«33353332*0ctmmgcoEEou
`
`
`
`3E0{Sum—um;
`
`255mg3E::6E55.3
`
`£3252*0£55nuSEE.mj
`
`
`
`vcm“cmumm.3;9t*0EmomEwan?ucmWE.Emumm
`
`
`
`
`
`c0330Emummm£0:
`
`
`mo«2waEwcfioz>5Bram
`
`.3
`
`
`
`m:o~:<v6eurekaJO8:35.mj
`
`wzcm>
`
`98528B855.63:35.3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PmioxwEmEOIdc.AmutmEll$29502.:oflugm
`
`
`
`E:206
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`23>Sou.mcfimuwim5‘6“.cumin:8as.“.036553...RE.ucmcosmoamo
`
`mi
`
`
`
`a:$33.230m8..Earn:
`
`
`
`
`
`7.thwkm2£293.dciom.oE._mco_umc._0uc_bu
`
`:55a3:80adfism8mm
`
`
`
`
`
`2822.3.u:.XBEE
`
`
`
`830.25“c0390“:GD
`
`.05\mmcmcoxm
`
`.uE‘m>z
`
`>nm._m_.wmmtmadmfimm>w>>c=m
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6:.3mm>95chvcm0.:wwwm>923..>.900meum>wwrfimwt<nmmeEmcm
`
`
`
`6c.\m>z‘>0.:~mm‘iucw>co_uw>occ_
`
`
`
`
`
`c0350..wLusEzvlmom5:039:35ncm<amEOuu<
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.2:.wmcmzuxm“us—«mom$523535.25<umE82.>.2:£=w>mfioctmfi
`
`
`
`
`
`adLtEmbwmm“Em>cquoUmucmLJmEUm<.>U._._6.5933
`
`“3..EmEma>>39:59.2LmNtwumEmcuiucw“9:05
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EmzuSwimm—uiLegacy‘so.>.98mqumumOm2umE26:50380900Extum
`
`.ur:.quoEuthmum
`
`
`
`
`
`3me.13.mflmeocsum...9.9mL2339%‘$3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0dScmanu5E3“.ND}0.:SamanUwcfimflsu:EEfl.>JE‘ctotuzu
`.uEcmzommzuoiUcm50520800mwfisoéuwh39m.__<wmzocmEumES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“3.—Etw>>:mmwmx>mhwcm35353..
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`m\n\_uLumm>cmanu2.5.qumfiwmzcummmmfi53mm;>cmanu2.50mi5532
`
`3.5.DddSchmmubaorgm
`
`.34285::.>.00Vw3:0szEuucoman._.m
`
`.5550
`
`REGwpm:2£633.wEnom0.:6.39mummgofiwcwczcoflwwc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`._mum.SamanUmuth<596230:3..>.U._._‘mncmhmummgw.mucm‘c083:—
`
`
`
`Uj.mquhummncmzox.>.2:gmcoszEEUm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dc.\mwtofihonflEsEcwEE.>3:_UEmccflmEncm.31.~xouEmvE<
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`330x.2::mcoszqu936:0:Umnox0...nmu_E:.>cmnEouutuuwm‘.>>5m_m1:533.
`
`
`
`
`ucmummuth:Scan—:00utuummm\S.>LwcoEuwmA003:nmtE:a:0..m>.om
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dc..ficozNEoE.@5551.>:oonEouL205
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.2:AmutmES>mo_oczum.rcomhuc>m.>.05.c0m>n_
`
`v.33awx5380800mmmmoficsuwk3.95.__<330595me
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9.:>no.23355.>”559093“mm_mo_occum.~mxm‘i:<mmsoficfimmg
`
`mez38
`
`mama
`
`mfiow
`
`mHON
`
`wHON
`
`DEN
`
`\‘HON
`
`NHON
`
`mHON
`
`Bfiom
`
`mHON
`
`
`
`‘vHON‘moow
`
`mfiom
`
`wHON
`
`mHoN
`
`mHON
`
`mHON
`
`mHON
`
`
`
`mMON‘vfiow
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`|PR2019-00514
`
`Page 24
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 24
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`ANM Accused Controller Unit Sales
`
`APPENDIX B
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 25
`
`

`

`APPENDIX C
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 26
`
`

`

`
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`|PR2019-00514
`
`Page 27
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2055
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 27
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket