throbber

`
`Transcript of Conference Call
`
`Date: September 5, 2019
`Case: American National Manufacturing Inc. -v- Sleep Number Corporation, et al.
`
`Planet Depos
`Phone: 888.433.3767
`Email:: transcripts@planetdepos.com
`www.planetdepos.com
`
`WORLDWIDE COURT REPORTING & LITIGATION TECHNOLOGY
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 1
`
`

`

` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` ----------------
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` ----------------
` AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING INC.
` Petitioner,
` v.
` SLEEP NUMBER CORPORATION
` f/k/a SELECT COMFORT CORPORATION,
` Patent Owner.
` ----------------
` Case IPR 2019-00497 (Patent 8,769,747 B2)
` Case IPR 2019-00500 (Patent 9,737,154 B2)
` Case IPR 2019-00514 (Patent 5,904,172)
` ----------------
` Conference Call
`BEFORE: JUDGE DANIELS, JUDGE IPPOLITO, JUDGE
`FINAMORE, Administrative Patent Judges
`The above-entitled matter came on for hearing on
`September 5, 2019, commencing telephonically at
`10:32 a.m.
`Job No.: 261408
`Pages: 1-32
`Reported by: Bonnie Panek
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 2
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`2
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S
`ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:
` KYLE L. ELLIOTT, ESQUIRE
` KEVIN S. TUTTLE, ESQUIRE
` LAW OFFICES OF SPENCER FANE, LLP
` 1000 Walnut Street, Suite 1400
` Kansas City, Missouri 64106
` (816) 474-8100
`
` JASPAL SINGH HARE, ESQUIRE
` LAW OFFICES OF SPENCER FANE, LLP
` 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 4800 West
` Dallas, Texas 75201
` (214) 750-3610
`
`ON BEHALF OF PATENT OWNER:
` LUKE TOFT, ESQUIRE
` LAW OFFICES OF FOX, ROTHCHILD, LLP
` Campbell Mithun Tower
` 222 South Ninth Street, Suite 2000
` Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-3338
` (612) 607-7336
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 3
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`3
`
`STEVEN A. MOORE, ESQUIRE
`LAW OFFICES OF PILLSBURY, WINTHROP,
`SHAW, PITTMAN, LLP
`501 West Broadway, Suite 1100
`San Diego, California 92101-3505
`(619) 234-5000
`
`KECIA J. REYNOLDS, ESQUIRE
`LAW OFFICES OF PILLSBURY, WINTHROP,
`SHAW, PITTMAN, LLP
`1200 Seventeenth Street, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`(202) 663-8000
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 4
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`4
`
` C O N T E N T S
`REMARKS BY: PAGE
`Mr. Toft 6
`Mr. Tuttle 7
`Mr. Toft 7
`Mr. Tuttle 8
`Mr. Toft 13
` E X H I B I T S
` (None.)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 5
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`5
`
` P R O C E E D I N G S
` THE REPORTER: Okay. I'm ready to go
`ahead and get started.
` JUDGE DANIELS: Let me just follow up.
`Mr. Tuttle, are you doing the speaking for
`petitioner?
` MR. TUTTLE: Yes. Yes, Your Honor.
` JUDGE DANIELS: Great. Okay. Also on
`the phone with me today are Judges Ippolito and
`Finamore, and I'm going to invite them at least at
`the end to ask some questions since at least Judge
`Finamore is going to be doing some of the writing
`of these cases now that we've got all three.
` Just to recap this is a conference call
`for IPR 2019-00497, 00500 and 00514. It sounds
`like we have on the record all of the counsel, so
`we'll skip that part. We don't need to reiterate
`that. I have a couple -- well, the panel has a
`couple of questions for the parties before we get
`into a more thorough discussion.
` Let me start off by asking Mr. Toft --
`and Mr. Tuttle, please, you can weigh in after or
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 6
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`6
`
`respond. Mr. Toft, do you have -- can you give us
`a general idea of the size of these companies at
`least with regards to the products we're talking
`about?
` In other words, is your client
`significantly bigger, the same size, you know, as
`far as sales of these products? I understand
`that's some of the information you may be looking
`for in your discovery request, but can you give me
`a general idea?
` MR. TOFT: Yeah, absolutely. The --
`unfortunately the air mattress market is not
`something that is studied. The market, the field
`is mattresses and there isn't a good understanding
`out there as to the market size of the mattresses
`that are sold that have air mattresses.
` My understanding is that Sleep Number
`and ANM, Sizewise are some of the major players
`and Sleep Number is larger. It is my
`understanding at least that Sleep Number is larger
`than both ANM and Sizewise.
` JUDGE DANIELS: And Mr. Tuttle, that's
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 7
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`7
`
`commensurate with what you know?
` MR. TUTTLE: Yeah. I mean, our
`understanding is that Sizewise is significantly
`larger than American National Manufacturing or
`Sizewise -- I'm sorry. Sleep Number is
`significantly larger than American National or
`Sizewise, you know, in particular as evidenced by
`their -- a lot of their marketing that we're all
`familiar with on television and whatnot.
` JUDGE DANIELS: Thank you. Mr. Toft,
`what -- when did Sleep Number -- approximately
`what -- let me just ask the year rather than a
`date. What year did Sleep Number start selling
`its relevant products?
` MR. TOFT: I apologize. I wasn't quite
`ready for that question.
` JUDGE DANIELS: That's my job, to keep
`you on your toes.
` MR. TOFT: Yep. So there are two
`different technologies really at issue here. The
`172 patent and the IPR 2019-00514 is an older
`technology, and I believe we started selling those
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 8
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`8
`
`products in the '98 time frame, 1998 time frame.
` The -- but I could double check and get
`back to you on that if you want a more precise
`answer, and the products that incorporate the
`technology utilized in the 747154 patents that are
`at issue in the 00497 and 00514 proceedings I
`believe hit the market in around 2009 --
` JUDGE DANIELS: Okay.
` MR. TOFT: -- but I could also double
`check that and get back to you if --
` JUDGE DANIELS: No, I just sort of --
`these are some general questions and they're
`helpful just for the context of what we're talking
`about today. And let me ask Mr. Tuttle, can you
`tell me what ANM's approximate year that they
`started selling their products?
` MR. TUTTLE: Well, they've -- the air
`mattress market is sort of a separate market out
`there in the field, and my understanding is that
`American National Manufacturing has been at least
`manufacturing in the air mattress market since
`about 1990s, but we'd have to verify that with the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 9
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`9
`
`client, and you're looking at the modern versions
`were manufactured in the mid 2000s.
` JUDGE DANIELS: What about the ones
`that are potentially infringing that are accused
`of infringing, and I think if I'm recalling what's
`in the discovery request the Q1, 2, 3, whatever
`numbers those were? Do you have a -- can you tell
`me a year? If you can't that's fine. I was just
`looking for again some general information on
`those accused products.
` MR. TUTTLE: Yeah, I don't have a
`specific year. My understanding is that those are
`the more recent products that we've made.
` JUDGE DANIELS: Sure. Okay. Let me
`shift gears. Mr. Tuttle, I've got a particular
`question for you. I'm going to assume that you
`think these discovery requests that we asked
`patent owner's counsel to show us are overbroad.
` And my question to you is this: If
`these were narrower, in other words if they didn't
`require for instance just for an example so much
`financial -- specific financial information and
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 10
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`10
`
`maybe they were centered on the sales data, just
`the sales numbers, whether that's unit sales per
`month or per -- annually, would that be something
`your client would be more inclined to produce or I
`guess -- and then the follow-up question to that
`is or are you going to fight these sort of tooth
`and nail all the way through as far as these
`discovery requests?
` MR. TUTTLE: Well, our client's
`position now is that the discovery requests are
`not relevant and overly broad. Certainly they're
`overbroad in time frame and scope as I think we're
`talking about here right now.
` In addition in the infringement
`contingencies of the district court the patent
`owner has identified what of its products it
`alleges practiced the patents that we're dealing
`with here and in almost all of the challenged
`claims.
` JUDGE DANIELS: The reason I'm asking
`this question is because -- and I'd like to get an
`answer from you. The reason I'm asking the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 11
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`11
`
`question is I can sort of try and point the
`parties here towards a stipulation or determining
`what might be relevant to -- and the parties might
`be willing to share with each other themselves and
`resolve this dispute among themselves which is
`always -- or the board's going to do it with these
`motions.
` So that's one of the overarching
`factors, so the question again is are -- would
`your client be open to stipulating to some
`narrower information if patent owner narrowed its
`request?
` MR. TUTTLE: I mean, at this point
`without -- we did send it to the client and we
`haven't received any feedback yet, but I think a
`general consensus would be no. The information
`they do seek is subject to a higher level of
`confidentiality at the district court level, and
`so that's why we raised a protective order issue,
`and we kind of see this as unfortunately a fishing
`expedition when they have sales information
`themselves.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 12
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`12
`
` JUDGE DANIELS: Look, I understand
`that, you know, everything at the district court
`level is -- the judge hasn't even probably looked
`at it yet. I know why he puts it all under
`confidential, because he doesn't want to deal with
`it at the moment. I'm not really that concerned
`about that.
` What I'm really looking to do is we
`need to make sure, because we have the federal
`circuit that is very interested in the objective
`indicia of secondary considerations, I want to
`make sure we get all the facts and evidence we
`need without being overly broad so that we get
`into infringement issues, so that's why I'm asking
`this question if there was room, but it sounds
`like there is not.
` So with that said let me say this: I
`think I would have to agree, Mr. Toft, that these
`are pretty fairly broad, at least our initial
`impression that these are fairly broad for the
`limited purposes of what you need to do and show
`for objective indicia and not obviousness,
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 13
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`13
`
`especially in light of the fact that you are
`probably the larger player here.
` But again we want to make sure we get
`all the information on the table. So let me tell
`you, my other concern is -- our other concern is
`that, you know, any time we start to talk about
`nexus of someone's product, of petitioner's
`product it can lead to issues of infringement.
` We don't have that authority, nor do I
`want to step on a district court judge's, you
`know, turf or toes on that matter, but having said
`that, and I'd like to you just -- you know, I'm
`sure you're aware keeping in mind the Garmin
`factors, let me give you the floor to explain your
`motion.
` MR. TOFT: So I appreciate you bringing
`that up. This is one thing that I wanted to
`preview for the board and for petitioner, and this
`isn't quite ripe yet because we have not discussed
`this with petitioner.
` But on the nexus front there will -- we
`will be going to the district court to ask for a
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 14
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`14
`
`slight modification of the protective order or an
`agreement with petitioner to be able to use -- you
`know, as you're aware, or as you may be aware the
`patents and suit for the 00497 and 00500
`procedures are -- they use source codes in the
`products in order to practice the inventions.
` And the source code has been produced
`in the district court level under AEO
`designations, but we would like to use our
`infringement contentions to show the nexus, and so
`there will be that request going out, and if
`that's something that we can't resolve we might be
`back in front of you asking just to be able to use
`that information here in this proceeding.
` But as to the discovery requests
`themselves we tried to keep them relatively
`narrowed to the products that we have identified
`at this point and the particulars of the products
`that we believe read on the patented claims and
`not looking for additional products, and in the
`comparison of those products to products sold by
`ANM and as well as Sleep Number that do not
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 15
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`15
`
`practice the patented products, and we'll be using
`that information.
` And the reason that we're seeking the
`information that we are is because we believe that
`not only is the units sold a factor to consider in
`the commercial success but also the profit margin
`of the products, and to the extent the products
`can have a greater -- the products that
`incorporate the patented technology have a greater
`profit margin that is indicia of the commercial
`success of those products which is why we're
`asking for the cost of goods sold or cost of sales
`and the gross profit margins and any other costs
`that vary.
` And the other reason that we're looking
`for the, you know, specificness to the skew and
`product names and features is because there are
`several features that will need to be considered
`in that analysis to make sure that we are focusing
`our efforts on what it is that is causing the
`commercial success of those products, and then
`finally the date of the sale of the products is
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 16
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`16
`
`also relevant to the indicia of copying as to when
`the products first hit the market by ANM and
`Sizewise, so I guess that's --
` JUDGE DANIELS: Let me break in for a
`second. What -- if I'm understanding you
`correctly you have this information already in the
`-- from the district court litigation, and just
`remind me those cases are stayed?
` MR. TOFT: Those cases are stayed, but
`we do not have all of this information from
`petitioner in the district court case, which is
`why we're here asking for it. We don't have most
`of it, actually, so -- but yes, they are stayed.
` JUDGE DANIELS: What do you have, what
`information do you have?
` MR. TOFT: I would have to double
`check, but I believe that there is some sales
`information as to units sold, but there is not a
`breakdown of the cost of goods sold or cost of
`sales in order to determine an accurate gross
`profit margin or any other costs that vary, and
`those are only up to the -- as to the products
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 17
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`17
`
`that incorporate some of the technology.
` We have nothing for products that
`don't, so there's no way to do an analysis as to a
`profit margin that would exist on the products
`that incorporate those patented claims versus the
`ones that do not.
` JUDGE DANIELS: Why is profit -- why is
`profit -- I understand that -- so you're going to
`have to spend a lot of time telling us how the
`profits are indicative of -- I'm having a hard
`time I guess understanding why profit is anymore
`impressive as to commercial success than sales and
`why we should -- that's a pretty burdensome ask.
` All that gross net, you know, financial
`data is a lot and especially, you know, to ask
`them to put it into particular Excel forms, I
`mean, that's a lot of work. We've got limited
`time here. That sounds more like a district
`court, you know, discovery request. Explain to me
`why the profit is so important.
` MR. TOFT: Well, I think it just -- it
`shows -- if you can sell a product that does not
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 18
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`18
`
`have the patented technology for, for example, a
`hundred dollars profit, but your profit margin
`increases by 50 percent if you can incorporate the
`patented technology I think that that shows that
`the commercial success in addition to whether or
`not it drives actual sales, there's an additional
`benefit that a company that's the patented
`technology that might not always be present in the
`sales data alone.
` And to the burdensome -- you know,
`these are large companies that keep, you know, at
`least the general practice, I'm not here to speak
`for ANM or Sizewise, but the general practice is
`to keep this information and, you know, a lot of
`times they can be -- you know, the information
`that you're seeking can be inputted and printed
`out in a report.
` I don't -- I'm not aware of this being
`an overly burdensome request. There's nothing
`that we're asking for that wouldn't naturally be
`tracked by a company.
` JUDGE DANIELS: Let me ask, Mr. Tuttle,
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 19
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`19
`
`if you can respond to sort of those two points in
`particular. I mean, understanding that -- just
`understanding that it sounds like the sales unit
`-- the unit sales data is out there and available
`it sounds like can you address the profit question
`and the burden question I just asked Mr. Toft?
` MR. ELLIOTT: Your Honor, this is Kyle
`Elliott. My apologies for interjecting. Mr.
`Tuttle got dropped off. I think he's back on, and
`to the extent that Mr. Tuttle can't answer those I
`as lead counsel probably have even though I'm out
`of the office and otherwise indisposed.
` Kevin, are you back on?
` MR. TUTTLE: I'm back on. I apologize
`for that.
` MR. ELLIOTT: Okay. Go ahead and
`address it and then I'll jump in if His Honor
`wishes me to. Thank you.
` MR. TUTTLE: I apologize. I missed
`half of those questions, so Kyle, if you can carry
`that.
` MR. ELLIOTT: Sure. So first of all
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 20
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`20
`
`the profit margin, the way that specifically this
`is tracked is not on a per product basis,
`especially on the medical side of products. It's
`tracked more on a gross sense, so that is an
`owner's thing to collect. Thus far all those
`products that are unaccused, you know, no
`production has been made to those, as Mr. Toft
`says.
` That is the vast, vast majority of
`Sizewise's sales and revenue as opposed to the
`accused products which I'll refer to -- you'll
`hear Platinum is the name of those products, and
`so it is very onerous and significantly would
`expand the scope of discovery between the parties
`even beyond what has taken place already in the
`district court.
` Further, while that is financial
`information, et cetera, that we withheld I would
`note that the patent owner in the district court
`litigation has also so far not provided any of
`their financial information for us. It's been
`intentionally withheld. So the other thing about
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 21
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`21
`
`the source codes being sought here is that that is
`third party code.
` And we can't even guarantee that the
`third parties would provide permission for it to
`be used in this context. That's something that's
`more -- if anyone will secure it voluntarily we
`have, but that's another piece that -- you know,
`part of this request is going to expand this
`particular dispute in front of the board beyond
`what its scope should be.
` JUDGE DANIELS: Okay. All right. Let
`me let -- Mr. Toft, if you want go ahead and
`finish up anything else you have to say, and then
`I'll let either Mr. Elliott or Mr. Tuttle respond
`and then I'll go talk about it with the other
`judges. Mr. Toft.
` MR. TOFT: Yeah, just to make sure are
`we -- or just to be clear are we talking about
`just the additional discovery request?
` JUDGE DANIELS: Yeah, so if you want to
`finish off, I mean, you know -- so let me ask this
`question. Let me ask a follow-up question. What
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 22
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`22
`
`-- I'm assuming you want more pages for your
`patent owner response because you're anticipating
`that this information would require significantly
`more space to discuss in particular the issues
`that are surrounding the -- what appears to be
`some -- the software and the method.
` MR. TOFT: And that's part of the
`request for additional word count. I think that,
`you know, to expand on that a little bit there are
`-- in addition to the commercial success and
`potential copying indicia of secondary
`considerations that might be, you know, discovered
`in this discovery, or utilized in this discovery
`rather, there is additional evidence that we have
`of other secondary considerations which we would
`want to address and which obviously were not
`addressed in the petition.
` So in addition to having to respond to
`every argument in the petition there will be
`substantial arguments related to secondary
`considerations that we will want to make as to all
`three patents at issue. But in addition to that
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 23
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`23
`
`there are procedural issues which -- you know,
`some of which we've mentioned in our patent owner
`preliminary response which we will want to address
`in order to preserve, and there are several
`substantive issues in these petitions.
` There -- each of the proceedings was
`presented on multiple claims and grounds. You
`know, for example, the 514 there are 13 grounds
`asserted against that one patent, which is a very
`unusually high number of grounds. In each of the
`proceedings are there are several claim
`constructions at issue. In two of them there are
`six identified just by petitioner that we will
`have to address, which we only addressed two of in
`our preliminary response, but there are additional
`claims at issue the patent owner will want to
`address.
` The same with the 514, there are terms
`that they give, you know, multiple alternative
`constructions that each of those are going to have
`to be addressed, and in addition the claims at
`issue are even on the limitation by limitation
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 24
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`24
`
`analysis, for example, in the 00500 proceeding for
`the 154 patent some of the claims and the
`limitations are quite long.
` For example, claim 12 which was
`asserted has 13 claim limitations, some of which
`are a paragraph long, and to -- in order to fully
`address each of the challenges and to present our
`evidence of secondary considerations we are
`seeking additional word count. At this time we're
`thinking a 25 percent increase to the word count
`limit would be appropriate, but would defer to the
`board on that.
` JUDGE DANIELS: Mr. Tuttle, I assume
`that if we did you would -- you'd want a similar
`amount of pages, or it is word count, true?
` MR. TUTTLE: Yes.
` JUDGE DANIELS: Twenty-five percent is
`a lot. I'm not averse, you know, to a little bit
`of room, but we can sort of deal with that. We
`can deal with that. You know, 25 percent is a
`lot. I'm sort of more in the range of 10 percent
`perhaps, but let's do this.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 25
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`25
`
` In looking at this -- in looking at
`this I've got to tell you, Mr. Toft, I think that
`if we were to grant these -- I'm going to go talk
`with the judges here, but our overall impression
`is that if we were to grant these it would not be
`in the significant financial breadth that you've
`asked for here.
` So my thought, and I'll amend this
`after talking with the judges here in a second if
`I need to but, you know, if we allow these motions
`and responses I would sort of curb your enthusiasm
`for the amount of discovery that the board would
`be willing to allow. All right. So with that
`said let me take a break here for a moment and go
`talk with the other judges, and we'll be right
`back. Thanks.
` (There was a brief recess in the
`proceedings from 10:58 a.m. until 11:04 a.m.)
` JUDGE DANIELS: Hi. We're back. All
`right. Well, overall I think we're going to
`authorize a 10-page motion for additional
`discovery and an equal 10-page response. No reply
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 26
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`26
`
`is authorized at this time. We can deal with that
`if you deem it necessary later. So a couple of
`other housekeeping matters on this.
` If this goes to the increased page
`limit and the problem that you are raising for us
`with this is that these issues of nexus to a
`petitioner's product raise these issues as
`infringement, that as I noted before we are very
`reluctant to tread on places the board is not
`authorized to go.
` The more time you spend having to do
`this the less likely we probably are to do it. If
`you look at some of our precedent in allowing
`additional discovery you'll notice that these are
`fairly simple -- these are fairly simple claims
`and products that are easy to show nexus to.
` So all of that to some extent goes to
`again, indicating to Mr. Toft, to you that you are
`free to narrow your discovery request in order to
`potentially get us to grant them, so I just wanted
`to leave you with that on top of the fact that we
`are going to grant this or authorize these
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 27
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`27
`
`motions.
` A couple of other points. To the
`extent you have information in the district court
`that's under a protective order we wanted to
`remind you that you need to go back to the
`district court and modify that so that you can
`produce it in front of us. That's usually what
`the parties have done in the past and it is fairly
`straight forward.
` That should not be a difficult -- too
`difficult a modification to make, and with respect
`to a protective order in front of us if you all
`have stipulated to one you can submit it to us
`and, you know, absent some real problem we're
`going to -- we'll grant that, so that's the
`protective order stuff I wanted to touch on.
` From the standpoint of this issue of
`the word count and extending that you're free to
`address it in your -- you're free to address it to
`the extent you like in your motion and briefs on
`this issue. From a scheduling perspective we
`probably need to get this done sooner rather than
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 28
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`28
`
`later.
` Do you all -- I asked you all I think
`in an E-mail to have some idea of what that
`briefing schedule would be. Mr. Toft, do you have
`any suggestions based on since sort of the ball is
`in your court for discovery at the moment?
` MR. TOFT: Yeah. So I had thought --
`well, I haven't discussed this with opposing
`counsel, but the -- that our opening brief would
`be due a week from today with their opposition --
`so Thursday, the 12th, with the opposition due
`Tuesday, the 17th.
` And then hopefully we can have an
`answer by the end of that week, and then depending
`on the answer the counsel can work together to
`determine whether or not we need to stipulate to a
`modification of due dates one, two and three was
`my suggestion.
` JUDGE DANIELS: How does that work for
`you, Mr. Tuttle?
` MR. TUTTLE: As to our response five
`days after their's I think we'd need at least
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING, INC. - EX 1040 - Page 29
`
`

`

`Transcript of Conference Call
`Conducted on September 5, 2019
`
`29
`
`seven days.
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket