throbber
Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
` AMERICAN NATIONAL MANUFACTURING )
` INC., )
` )
` Petitioner, )
` )
` vs. ) IPR2019-00497
` ) Patent 8,769,747 B2
` SLEEP NUMBER CORPORATION, ) IPR2019-00500
` f/k/a SELECT COMFORT ) Patent 9,737,154 B2
` CORPORATION, )
` )
` Patent Owner. )
` __________________________________)
`
` DEPOSITION OF CRAIG MILLER
` February 20, 2020
` Corona, California
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reported by:
`Michael G. McMorran
`Job no: 27001
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2097
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 1
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 2
` DEPOSITION OF CRAIG MILLER, taken on behalf of
` Patent Owner at 9:01 a.m., Thursday, February 20th,
` 2020, at 2731 Blue Springs Drive, Corona, California,
` before Michael G. McMorran, Certified Shorthand
` Reporter No. 13735 of the State of California, RPR,
` pursuant to Notice.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3
`
` APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL:
` FOR PETITIONER:
` SPENCER FANE, LLP
` BY: KYLE L. ELLIOTT, ESQ.
` 1000 Walnut Street
` Suite 1400
` Kansas City, Missouri 64106-2140
` (816) 292-8150
` kelliott@spencerfane.com
`
` FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
` FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
` BY: ANDREW S. HANSEN, ESQ.
` 222 South Ninth Street
` Suite 2000
` Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-3338
` (612) 607-7000
` ahansen@foxrothschild.com
`
`
` Also present: LARRY ASKEW
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4
`
` I N D E X
` WITNESS: Craig Miller
` EXAMINATION PAGE
` By Mr. Hansen 5
` By Mr. Elliott 109
`
` E X H I B I T S
` EX. DESCRIPTION PAGE
` 1 Document entitled "Agreement" 20
` CONFIDENTIAL
`
` 2 Spreadsheet 24
`
` 3 Declaration of Craig Miller, Jr. in 31
` Support of Petitioner's Reply to Patent
` Owner's Response
`
` 4 Timeline diagram 50
`
` 5 Document entitled "Dires Advertising 67
` Spend Periods 1-4" CONFIDENTIAL
` 6 Document entitled "Dires' Disapproval 76
` Suspension Timeline - Private Search
` Engine Companies"
` 7 IPR 10 Exhibit to Supplemental 89
` Declaration of Craig Miller, Jr. in
` Support of Petitioner's Reply to Patent
` Owner's Response
`
` 8 IPR 11 Exhibit to Supplemental 93
` Declaration of Craig Miller, Jr. in
` Support of Petitioner's Reply to Patent
` Owner's Response CONFIDENTIAL
` 9 American National Invoice No. 0491641-IN 114
`
`
`
`Page 5
` CORONA, CALIFORNIA; THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 20TH, 2020
` 9:01 A.M.
` * * *
` CRAIG MILLER,
` the Witness herein, having been first duly sworn,
` testified as follows:
` -oOo-
` EXAMINATION
` BY MR. HANSEN:
` Q Good morning, Mr. Miller.
` A Good morning.
` Q As you know, my name is Andy Hansen. I'm
` counsel for Sleep Number.
` We've met before, correct?
` A We have.
` Q Let me ask you just some preliminary
` background questions about preparation today and prior
` testimony that you've given.
` You've given depositions before, right?
` A I have.
` Q And you've given trial testimony before?
` A I have.
` Q Have you given any depositions or trial
` testimony outside of the matters that you've had with
` Sleep Number?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`2 (Pages 2 to 5)
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2097
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Page 6
`
`Page 8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A Once.
` Q What was that?
` A It was in a -- on a medical bed application
` where it was a customer we were manufacturing products
` for, there was an exposure to latex.
` Q When did this occur?
` A Mid '90s.
` Q Okay. And can you describe your current role
` with American National Manufacturing?
` A I'm the president.
` Q How about with a company called Dires, LLC?
` A Manager.
` Q And what is your role with Sizewise?
` A I am the chief manufacturing innovation
` officer.
` Q How long have you held that position, the one
` with Sizewise?
` A That one changed maybe two years ago, if I
` remember correctly.
` Q Have you been involved with any other
` litigation besides litigation with Sleep Number?
` A Nothing that ever came to anything
` otherwise -- other than just resolving something.
` Q Like -- and it was kind of a little bit of a
` vague question, I think, so let me break it down a
`Page 7
`
` little bit.
` With ANM in your role -- you've been the
` president of ANM for a while now, right?
` A I have.
` Q How long?
` A Since the -- I don't remember exactly when my
` mom was the president. I was the vice president
` starting in '93. And then sometime thereafter, don't
` know exactly when that changed, but I think it changed
` about the time that we merged with Sizewise.
` So probably 2007 would be my recollection.
` Q During your time as president of ANM, are you
` aware of ANM being involved in litigation with any
` other companies?
` A Not since -- no, I haven't.
` Q With any consumers?
` A With any -- not -- nothing that comes to my
` mind.
` Q And how about Dires? Same question.
` Set aside the Sleep Number litigations, have
` you been involved -- Dires -- have they been involved
` with any other litigation with any companies?
` MR. ELLIOTT: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: Not that I recall.
` /////
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
` BY MR. HANSEN:
` Q With any consumers?
` A That was the question you asked.
` Not that I recall.
` Q Oh, I thought I said "companies," but --
` A Well, same answer.
` Q -- it covers both. Okay.
` And can you tell me a little bit about the
` relationship between ANM and Sizewise? What is the
` current relationship between the two companies?
` MR. ELLIOTT: I'll enter an objection as to
` scope. I realize we're doing a bit of background, but
` we don't want to turn into a -- something that's way
` beyond Mr. Miller's declaration in this IPR.
` THE WITNESS: So what was the question?
` BY MR. HANSEN:
` Q What is the relationship between ANM and
` Sizewise?
` A Well, Sizewise owns ANM.
` Q And the relationship between Sizewise and
` Dires?
` A Sizewise is the majority owner of Dires.
` Q And is ANM an owner of Dires?
` A ANM is not a direct owner of Dires.
` Q Is it -- is the ownership of Dires from ANM,
`Page 9
`
` basically, through you?
` MR. ELLIOTT: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: I think it's -- I think we need
` to back up to help -- you know, put things -- to make
` things more clear.
` BY MR. HANSEN:
` Q Sure.
` A So American National is a wholly owned
` subsidiary of Dires -- I'm sorry. American National is
` a wholly owned subsidiary of Sizewise.
` Okay. And then Dires is majority owned, over
` 80 percent owned -- was owned by Sizewise.
` Q And so who currently are the Dires owners?
` MR. ELLIOTT: Objection. Scope. That's way
` beyond anything we've got here.
` If we're going to continue to explore the
` corporate structure, you're going to have to give me
` some basis for why you think that's within the scope.
` MR. HANSEN: Well -- and I can tell you where
` it's going to come in later is questions about sales of
` products to Dires.
` So I'm trying to understand what the
` relationship is between ANM and Dires at this point, if
` they're separate entities or the same entity.
` MR. ELLIOTT: And how does that relate to the
`3 (Pages 6 to 9)
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2097
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Page 10
` sales that we're going to get into later that I think
` are relevant to the scope?
` MR. HANSEN: Well, there's multiple ways we'll
` get into it. We'll get into it with certain statements
` that have been made about the relationship when you get
` into false statements, which is within the scope of the
` declarations that were given when we talk about false
` statements from a previous litigation.
` In addition, when we're talking about sales
` from ANM to Dires, it's relevant as to whether or not
` that is a direct to consumer or through a retailer,
` which gets in, again, to statements that have been
` made, which I'll ask questions about later.
` MR. ELLIOTT: Well, we know Dires isn't a
` consumer. So to me, you can -- I'm okay with that
` question.
` But why do you need to know the percentage
` ownership and who else is owners of Dires, you know,
` people that have never been mentioned in these IPRs?
` MR. HANSEN: I don't think it really matters
` if somebody has been mentioned in the IPR yet when I'm
` asking questions about statements that have been made
` in a declaration.
` I'm just getting some background right now
` about who is an owner of Dires, and I'm going to ask
`Page 11
` questions about statements that have been made where
` Dires is making sales to consumers where they're
` attributing it to ANM as the manufacturer, Dires as the
` manufacturer.
` And I'm trying to understand if these
` companies are separate or not.
` MR. ELLIOTT: Let's move forward. But, you
` know, to the extent we're trying to figure out what the
` overall corporate structure of all this is in this
` deposition now, I'm going to cut off, and we'll give a
` call to the paralegal and see if we can get the Board
` on the phone.
` MR. HANSEN: So you don't want me to ask any
` other questions about the ownership of Dires?
` Are you saying he's not going to answer that,
` or are you going to cut it off?
` MR. ELLIOTT: I'm saying let's go forward with
` your line of questioning. But what I'm saying is if
` it's continuing to turn into just an exploration of the
` whole ownership structure of individuals that aren't
` even real parties of interest in this IPR, then I'm
` going to cut it off.
` MR. HANSEN: Okay. I don't think I'm going to
` go where you're concerned I'm going. I just want to
` get the framework for what the ownership is.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Page 12
`
` MR. ELLIOTT: Okay.
` MR. HANSEN: That's all I'm looking for right
` now.
` MR. ELLIOTT: Okay.
` BY MR. HANSEN:
` Q I don't remember what the question was, but I
` believe it was who are the owners of Dires?
` A Okay. The owners of Dires -- the owners of
` Dires are the seven owners of Sizewise.
` Q Okay.
` A Okay? Because there are seven owners of
` Sizewise, and then there are three minority owners of
` Dires.
` But the owners of Sizewise own in excess of
` 80 percent of Dires.
` Q And you're one of the owners of Sizewise?
` A Correct.
` Q And the other three minority owners are not
` related to Sizewise?
` A Correct.
` Q Mr. Miller, in these IPRs, you've submitted
` different declarations at different points in time.
` Initially, you submitted a declaration relating to some
` discovery requests that Sleep Number was pursuing.
` Is that accurate?
`
`Page 13
`
` A Yes.
` MR. ELLIOTT: And to the extent that you're
` going to ask questions about that generally, but if
` you're going to go into specifics of it, that's a
` discovery motion that's already been decided. It's not
` part of his testimony of substance in the IPR and would
` also be beyond the scope of the testimony that's being
` taken today.
` MR. HANSEN: So you're saying that you
` don't -- you wouldn't -- you would object to any
` testimony relating to that prior declaration?
` MR. ELLIOTT: Mmm-hmm, supporting the
` discovery motion, yes. Some of that, I think, overlaps
` with the declaration that's at issue substantively that
` the testimony today pertains to -- that his direct
` testimony pertains to.
` MR. HANSEN: Well, I disagree with you that
` it's not relevant because I think we still have some
` carryover issues from discovery that are now at issue
` with the latest declarations that were put in when we
` sought discovery.
` Obviously, you objected to a lot of the
` discovery we sought.
` MR. ELLIOTT: Right.
` MR. HANSEN: It played out. There was an
`4 (Pages 10 to 13)
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2097
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Page 14
` order. And now we have a declaration in there that is
` taking issue.
` That's my characterization. You don't have to
` agree with it.
` MR. ELLIOTT: Sure.
` MR. HANSEN: But it's taking issue with some
` of the discovery that was produced, and there is
` additional documents that have been now put forward in
` the declaration that were not produced earlier when we
` were seeking that discovery.
` MR. ELLIOTT: Sure. And as to the discovery
` that was ordered and then anything that's been produced
` since then, I have no scope objections to that at all
` because that is supporting Mr. Miller's testimony that
` is in the declaration that's of substance here.
` So those what you state there regarding the
` discovery, I don't have issues with.
` MR. HANSEN: All right. Well, Counsel, why
` don't we put that aside for now? Just bear with me a
` moment.
` MR. ELLIOTT: Sure.
` MR. HANSEN: And I'll see if that's something
` that we're going to have to see if we can get on a call
` about.
` MR. ELLIOTT: Sure. Let me start tracking
`Page 15
`
` down the paralegal's phone number.
` BY MR. HANSEN:
` Q Well, let me ask you some questions about
` different companies that you have sold beds to in the
` past.
` A Okay.
` Q By "you," I'm talking about ANM. Okay? Is
` that fair?
` A Fair.
` Q At one point in time, you entered into a
` consulting agreement with Sleep Number, right?
` A Correct.
` Q And what year was that?
` A That was 2007, if I recall correctly.
` Q So prior to that time, ANM was selling beds to
` other retailers, right?
` A Correct.
` Q And what were those retailers?
` A There was a number of retailers. There were
` different retailers in the specialty sleep, you know,
` market. Mostly companies that had transitioned from
` selling waterbeds, which was our roots, our history,
` that then transformed our companies into selling
` specialty sleep products.
` Q What do you mean by "specialty sleep"?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Page 16
` A Products other than conventional bedding.
` They started from waterbeds, and then they evolved into
` things that were not mainstream.
` Q So when you say -- when you say that, is it
` like, basically, beds other than inner spring?
` Is that a fair way to describe it?
` MR. ELLIOTT: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: They make futon. The shows we
` attended was the specialty sleep shows.
` BY MR. HANSEN:
` Q Okay.
` A And then it became the specialty sleep and
` futon shows. That's why I'm saying it that way.
` Q Okay. Did ANM -- you mentioned waterbeds.
` Did ANM manufacture any other types of beds? This is
` pre-entering that agreement with Sleep Number.
` A Yes.
` Q What types of beds were those?
` A Prior to entering the agreement with
` Sleep Number, we manufactured all types of, you know,
` obviously, waterbeds, but also adjustable firmness
` mattresses as well.
` Q Adjustable firmness -- is that using air
` technology?
` A Yes.
`
`Page 17
`
` Q Any other types of beds?
` A Yeah. We would make other types of products
` that were specialty in nature.
` Q Can you give me some examples?
` A Products that would go in motorhomes. Just we
` were a specialty, you know, manufacturer; so we
` manufactured a lot of custom, you know, mattresses to
` go into truck drivers, you know, rigs. Just various
` specialty, you know, products, including the medical
` products.
` Q And setting aside the medical products, these
` specialty mattresses -- would they be all adjustable
` air, or would some of them be different types of
` mattresses?
` A They would be different types. Some would be
` air.
` Q When you say "different types," would some of
` them be inner spring?
` A We've done some inner spring, but not very
` much.
` Q In your declaration that you submitted in --
` it's Exhibit 1057 in the IPR, and it's titled
` "Declaration of Craig Miller, Jr. in Support of
` Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner Response," you talk
` about different programmers that you've worked with
`5 (Pages 14 to 17)
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2097
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 5
`
`

`

`Page 18
`
` regarding source code.
` Do you recall that?
` A Yes.
` Q And you mentioned a company called Medisphere.
` Do you recall that?
` A Yes.
` Q When did you start working with Medisphere?
` A I would say approximately 1995, I believe.
` Q And what was Medisphere doing for ANM?
` A Medisphere was actually manufacturing medical
` controllers for one of our common customers.
` Q So Medisphere was providing a product for you
` on the medical side, not the consumer side?
` A On the medical side, correct. And they were
` supplying products to the same -- we would manufacture
` a medical mattress for customer A, and Medisphere would
` supply the mating control unit to that same customer to
` then power it.
` Q So, you know, correct me if I'm wrong, but in
` doing that, Medisphere would be supplying ANM with
` source code to make that product work; is that right?
` MR. ELLIOTT: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: They sold pumps. And this
` complete pump, you know, we had -- it was already in
` there. It ran the product. It controlled the product.
`Page 19
`
` It operated an air mattress that we would make.
` BY MR. HANSEN:
` Q Okay. So there was source code in it; they
` weren't sending you source code separate, right?
` MR. ELLIOTT: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: Yeah. They sent a complete
` working product.
` BY MR. HANSEN:
` Q And when did ANM stop working with Medisphere?
` A I don't know the exact date when we stopped
` working with them, but it would -- I don't know if it
` was three years ago or five years ago.
` Q Fairly recent, though?
` A It's within the last -- yes, fairly recent.
` Q Okay. Is there a particular reason you
` stopped working with them?
` MR. ELLIOTT: Objection to scope.
` You can go ahead and answer.
` THE WITNESS: No, there was just the things
` evolve and change.
` BY MR. HANSEN:
` Q You mentioned that you worked with a company
` called Elynsen? Do I have that right? E-l-n-y-s-e-n?
` A Elynsen.
` Q Sorry.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 20
` MR. ELLIOTT: Objection to scope. Where is
` this tied in to his current testimony and declaration?
` That's going back to the discovery issues over
` the software that's not at issue in this testimony in
` this IPR.
` MR. HANSEN: Why don't we table it?
` MR. ELLIOTT: Sure.
` BY MR. HANSEN:
` Q Let's talk about the consulting agreement that
` you had with Sleep Number.
` A Okay.
` Q And you -- I think you mentioned you thought
` it was 2006 when you entered it.
` And do you recall it ended around the end of
` December 2011?
` MR. ELLIOTT: Objection. Form.
` THE WITNESS: I would have to see the
` document, but I believe that sounds correct.
` MR. HANSEN: All right. Why don't I get it
` out?
` (Exhibit 1 was marked.)
` MR. ELLIOTT: Thank you.
` BY MR. HANSEN:
` Q Mr. Miller, I've put in front of you what's
` been marked as Exhibit 1.
`
`Page 21
` Does this look like the original consulting
` agreement that you signed with what was at the time
` Select Comfort?
` A Yes.
` Q And if you look at paragraph 2 on the first
` page of that agreement, in the -- I guess it would be
` the second sentence, it talks about -- well, the whole
` paragraph 2 talks about your duties, right?
` A Yes.
` Q And that second sentence is talking about
` specific expertise is anticipated in the areas of
` product research and development and low cost country
` sourcing, right?
` A Yes.
` Q And in providing consulting services to
` Sleep Number, if you look at paragraph 2, it talks
` about devoting up to 20 hours per month, right?
` A Yes.
` Q And you believe you provided on average more
` than 20 hours per month, right?
` A Yes.
` Q Do you recall how much more you think on
` average you provided?
` A Not -- not as I sit here exactly how much
` more, no.
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`6 (Pages 18 to 21)
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2097
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 6
`
`

`

`Page 22
` Q Do you think it was double 20 hours? Like, 40
` hours?
` MR. ELLIOTT: Objection to scope. The
` consulting agreement clearly is at issue. You've
` raised it, we cited it.
` But is there any of his testimony that's
` pertaining to how many hours he actually worked on --
` on the consulting provision in this -- even in the
` discovery declarations, is there any testimony
` regarding how many hours he worked on?
` MR. HANSEN: I think this is relevant.
` MR. ELLIOTT: I'm going to enter the objection
` to scope because I believe the consulting agreement is
` here, but the questions that you're asking about the
` consulting agreement, I believe, are outside the scope.
` So I'll enter the objection. I'll allow him
` to answer the question.
` THE WITNESS: I don't know how much more.
` BY MR. HANSEN:
` Q Okay. And when you were doing this consulting
` agreement, you had a good understanding of
` Sleep Number's products, right?
` A Yes.
` Q And I'm saying "Sleep Number." You understand
` that's Select Comfort in time --
`
`Page 23
` A I understand that's Select Comfort at this
` time.
` Q Okay. And you had studied Sleep Number's
` mattresses, right?
` A I think we -- when you say "mattresses," I
` would say mattresses as far as the mattress itself
` separate and apart from control units.
` Q You had studied Sleep Number's control units
` too, right?
` A To the extent of how they operated to go
` from -- you know, adjust firmness. But as far as
` beyond that, not much more than that.
` Q And -- yeah. You testified before that you're
` very familiar with the operations of Sleep Number's air
` beds, right?
` A Yes.
` MR. ELLIOTT: Mr. Hansen, can we take a short
` break? I'm not getting any communications out of the
` room. I'm trying to track down the paralegal number.
` Everything is coming back bouncing.
` MR. HANSEN: Yeah, just one moment.
` MR. ELLIOTT: Sure.
` MR. HANSEN: Yeah, let's go ahead. Let's take
` a break.
` (Off the record from 9:30 a.m. to
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Page 24
`
` 9:52 a.m.)
` (Exhibit 2 was marked.)
` BY MR. HANSEN:
` Q Mr. Miller, I've given you what's been marked
` as Exhibit No. 2.
` Do you recognize this document?
` A I do.
` Q Can you tell me what it is?
` A This is the document with all the assorted
` data for various products.
` Q This was produced in discovery, right?
` A Yes.
` Q And this is actually the first page of a much
` larger document, right?
` A Much larger, yes.
` Q And you had attached this to your affidavit,
` correct?
` A Correct.
` Q And if you look at the top, there's some
` various columns that I want to go through.
` Can you walk me through what these are?
` "Invoice date" means what?
` A That means the date that the product was
` invoiced from American National.
` Q And is that the same as the month, then?
`Page 25
` What's the difference between those two? Just tell me
` what the month means.
` A Oh, same.
` Q Okay. And "Quarters"?
` A Would be the quarter for that particular
` invoice date or month.
` Q And then it's a given year, right?
` A That's correct.
` Q "Inner Company" -- what's that mean?
` A "Inner company" is the designation was it sold
` to Dires would be "Inner Company." Third-party would
` be somebody outside, you know, an unrelated
` third-party.
` Q "Stock ID"?
` A That is going to be the part number.
` Q And "descriptors" -- or does that say
` "Description"?
` A "Description."
` Q What's that mean?
` A A description of the product.
` Q "Combined Name" -- what's that mean?
` A That is going to be the part number with a
` description combined.
` Q "Units Sold"?
` A That would be the amount of units sold for
`7 (Pages 22 to 25)
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2097
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 7
`
`

`

`Page 26
` that particular month -- that particular day I should
` say.
` Q For that -- it's day-specific, right? Is that
` what you're saying?
` A Yes.
` Q Or is it -- is it day specific, or is it
` specific to that particular invoice that you started
` with?
` A Well, if you look at the invoice, you're
` starting with May 4th all the way to the top left-hand
` corner.
` Q Yep.
` A There were 25 units that were invoiced on
` May 4th.
` Q Okay. "Medical, Non-Medical"?
` A That designation -- is the product a medical
` product or a nonmedical product.
` Q "Accused" with a question mark?
` A Yes. That was a designation that we put on
` it. Was it an accused or not.
` Q And what does that mean, "accused"?
` MR. ELLIOTT: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: Accused -- we were looking for
` products that had -- if it had a manifold in it, it was
` going to be -- if it had one of the accused manifolds,
`Page 27
`
` it was accused.
` BY MR. HANSEN:
` Q And by "accused," you mean accused of
` infringing a Sleep Number patent?
` MR. ELLIOTT: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: Yes.
` BY MR. HANSEN:
` Q And did you put in the information in the
` accused column?
` A I personally did not enter them, but I went
` through it with a -- with a coworker to designate all
` of these because they wouldn't know.
` Q So you didn't personally type it in, but
` somebody else did at your direction?
` A Yes. Well, they know a big percentage of
` them, but not 100 percent. So it was a -- we both did
` it together to make sure we had it right.
` Q And who was the coworker?
` A Rick Jansen.
` Q What's his position?
` A He's our VP of operations.
` Q And then the next column says "Manifold." And
` can you tell me what that means?
` A If it had a -- one of the accused manifolds
` inside.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Page 28
` Q And "Software" -- do you know what that means?
` A Was there software inside.
` Q So just backing up to manifold for a question
` real quick. If I take your -- let me back up.
` If I'm understanding your answer, am I correct
` in saying that the manifold column relates to whether
` there's an accused manifold in there or just a
` manifold?
` MR. ELLIOTT: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: We would have went through and
` basically categorize this: Does this have a Koge
` manifold or a Arco manifold in it. And if it did, then
` it was accused.
` BY MR. HANSEN:
` Q So that -- so the manifold column is --
` because all these on this document are N/A, right, not
` applicable? Is that what that stands for?
` A Correct. So, for instance, top line item, for
` instance, alternating pressure pump.
` Q Sure.
` A That has a mechanical rotary valve inside that
` spins and makes a rotation, once every five or ten
` minutes, depends on the rotary valve; so there is no
` manifold in it whatsoever. There's hoses to connect
` different things up together.
`
`Page 29
` Q And what I'm trying to get at -- thank you for
` that, but what I'm trying to get at is in the manifold
` column, if it has a manifold that is not accused, would
` you say potentially yes, or are you only indicating,
` yes, if it's an accused manifold?
` A Well, we went down the list -- because the
` request, if I recall, was for, you know, we, obviously,
` had a list of the accused products, right?
` Q Right.
` A And when we'd go and we sorted this, we were
` selecting all of the pumps, and sometimes some other
` products came up in the search that were irrelevant
` such as these up top here.
` Q Okay.
` A So we wanted to make sure we caught everything
` that we possibly could.
` Q Okay. And I guess my -- and I'm probably just
` not asking it very well, but what I'm getting at is on
` this column, did you ever have a situation where there
` was a manifold, but it was not an accused manifold in a
` product whereby you would potentially answer yes?
` A I don't recall.
` Q Okay. And how about with software? I want to
` kind of get at the same thing. Do you have -- without
` getting into the huge document, do you recall if you
`8 (Pages 26 to 29)
`
`Sleep Number Corp.
`EXHIBIT 2097
`IPR2019-00514
`Page 8
`
`

`

`Page 30
` indicated that there was software associated with a
` given product even if it wasn't accused?
` A We just bulked these into accused and
` nonaccused if they had a manifold because it was --
` that's the way we bulked them.
` So, like, these here that say -- do you have
` the larger document so I can run through the entire
` piece?
` Q I would have to bring it up on my computer.
` If we need to, I can do that later, but --
` A I think we're going to need to.
` Q Okay.
` A Because I want to make sure that I'm perfectly
` clear.
` Q Okay. We'll go back to that.
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket