throbber
From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Jeremy Monaldo
`Trials; brett@etheridgelaw.com
`PR39521-0060IP1@fr.com; AXF-PTAB; PTAB Inbound; Deepa Acharya; Grace Kim; Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com; Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com; Jeff Huang; Brian Koide; Karl Renner
`RE: IPR2019-00510 // Re. challenged claim 18
`Friday, May 15, 2020 5:57:29 PM
`
`Your Honors,
`
`The Board asked the parties to set forth “whether there is an agreement between the parties to withdraw claim 18 from consideration in IPR2019-
`00510.” Petitioners understand that it is Uniloc’s position that:
`
` Uniloc is willing to withdraw claim 18 from the IPR, and
`
`Claim 18 of the 079 patent has been finally held invalid, Uniloc is estopped from asserting claim 18 in any pending or future litigation as a
`result of that finding, and the estoppel is not party specific. Rather, the estoppel applies to claim 18 of the 079 patent and Uniloc is
`estopped from any assertion of that claim against any party.
`
`Based on this understanding, Petitioners agree to withdraw the challenge to claim 18.
`
`Best Regards,
`Jeremy
`
`From: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 1:46 PM
`To: Jeremy Monaldo <Monaldo@fr.com>; brett@etheridgelaw.com; Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: PR39521-0060IP1@fr.com; AXF-PTAB <AXF-PTAB@fr.com>; PTAB Inbound <PTABInbound@fr.com>; Deepa Acharya
`<deepaacharya@quinnemanuel.com>; Grace Kim <gkim@fr.com>; Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com; Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com; Jeff Huang
`<jhuang@etheridgelaw.com>; Brian Koide <brian@etheridgelaw.com>; Karl Renner <renner@fr.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2019-00510 // Re. challenged claim 18
`
`Counsel,
`
`The Board appreciates the parties attempts to streamline the issues in IPR2019-00510 by discussing the withdrawal of claim 18 (recently held
`unpatentable by the Federal Circuit) from consideration.
`
`In light of the received emails, the parties shall meet and confer and jointly file an email no later than May 16, 2020 setting forth whether there is an
`agreement between the parties to withdraw claim 18 from consideration in IPR2019-00510.
`
`Regards,
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`(571)272-7822
`
`From: Jeremy Monaldo <Monaldo@fr.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 11:21 PM
`To: brett@etheridgelaw.com; Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: PR39521-0060IP1@fr.com; AXF-PTAB <AXF-PTAB@fr.com>; PTAB Inbound <PTABInbound@fr.com>; Deepa Acharya
`<deepaacharya@quinnemanuel.com>; Grace Kim <gkim@fr.com>; Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com; Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com; Jeff Huang
`<jhuang@etheridgelaw.com>; Brian Koide <brian@etheridgelaw.com>; Karl Renner <renner@fr.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2019-00510 // Re. challenged claim 18
`
`Your Honors,
`
`In response to Uniloc’s indication that it “will not petition for certiorari” on the adverse claim 18 indefiniteness decision in the related matter, we
`inspired outreach to Uniloc’s litigation counsel to confirm that Uniloc will withdraw the assertion of claim 18 in litigation against each of the
`Petitioners. The response from Uniloc’s litigation counsel was equivocal, indicating only that “we have not given thought to how to proceed” and
`“it is not our policy to assert claims that have been finally held invalid.” See, e.g., Attached Email from James Foster at Prince Lobel. Given that
`Uniloc did not definitively commit to withdraw claim 18 from pending litigations involving Petitioners and that Uniloc likewise was unwilling to
`confirm non-assertion of claim 18 in any future litigation against Petitioners, Petitioners cannot withdraw the challenge to claim 18 at this time. If,
`
`IPR2019-0510
`Ex. 3001 p. 1 of 2
`
`

`

`however, Uniloc definitively commits to withdrawing claim 18 from the pending litigations involving Petitioners and confirms that Uniloc will not
`assert claim 18 of the ’079 patent in any future litigation against Petitioners, Petitioners would agree to withdraw the present challenge to claim
`18.
`
`Best Regards,
`Jeremy
`
`Jeremy Monaldo :: Principal :: Fish & Richardson P.C.
`+1 (202) 626-7717 direct :: Monaldo@fr.com
`fr.com :: Bio :: LinkedIn :: Twitter
`
`From: brett@etheridgelaw.com <brett@etheridgelaw.com>
`Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 10:20 AM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: PR39521-0060IP1@fr.com; AXF-PTAB <AXF-PTAB@fr.com>; PTAB Inbound <PTABInbound@fr.com>; Jeremy Monaldo <Monaldo@fr.com>;
`Deepa Acharya <deepaacharya@quinnemanuel.com>; Grace Kim <gkim@fr.com>; Jim@EtheridgeLaw.com; Ryan@EtheridgeLaw.com; Jeff Huang
`<jhuang@etheridgelaw.com>; Brian Koide <brian@etheridgelaw.com>
`Subject: IPR2019-00510 // Re. challenged claim 18
`
`[Caution: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
`know the content is safe]
`
`Honorable Board:
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s instructions, given during oral argument yesterday in IPR2019-00510, that Patent Owner provide an update on its
`intentions in view of the recent federal circuit affirmance in Appeal. No. 19-2072 (affirming district court judgment of invalidity of claim 18), Patent
`Owner confirms to the Board that it will not petition for certiorari in that related matter.
`
`Respectfully,
`Brett Mangrum
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Reg. No. 64,783
`
`****************************************************************************************************************************
`This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
`information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
`sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
`****************************************************************************************************************************
`
`****************************************************************************************************************************
`This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
`information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
`sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
`****************************************************************************************************************************
`
`IPR2019-0510
`Ex. 3001 p. 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket