throbber
US006298052B1
`(10) Patent No.:
`a2) United States Patent
`US 6,298,052 B1
`Bousquetet al.
`(45) Date of Patent:
`Oct. 2, 2001
`
`
`(54) COMMUNICATION METHOD USED IN A
`SHARED RESOURCE TRANSMISSION
`SYSTEM
`
`(75)
`
`.
`:
`a.
`Inventors: Jacques Bousquet, Croissy sur Seine;
`Jean-Pierre Dehaene, Cormeilles en
`Parisis, both of (FR)
`;
`;
`(73) Assignee: Alcatel, Paris (FR)
`
`(*) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term ofthis
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`US.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`
`4,621,368 * 11/1986 Onoe et ale ieecsssecseecnserees 375/267
`4,841,527
`6/1989 Raychaudhurietal. .
`4,908,828 *
`3/1990 Tikalsky oo... sees 714/822
`:
`7/1991 Hochstein 2... cece 375/267
`5,034,966 *
`
`4/1992 Gilhousen et al. oe. 375/267
`5,109,390 *
`5138631
`8/1992 Taylor.
`5.142.533
`8/1992 Crisleret al
`5,168,510 * 12/1982 Hill
`ccessecsossssssseseessessssseeen 375/267
`5,457,678 * 10/1995 Goeldner ...cccsscsssescccsneeesen 370/395
`
`9/1997 Bolgiano et al. vss 375/138
`5,663,990 *
`3/1999 Dorenboschet al... 375/267
`5,883,581 *
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`2029170 *
`3/1980 (GB)
`eessscccssssssscsssssseseseces 714/822
`61 043850
`3/1986 (JP).
`62 131636
`6/1987 (JP).
`(21) Appl. No.: 09/033,702
`08 032596—-2/1996 (JP).
`(22)
`Filed:
`Mar.3, 1998
`
`(30)
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`
`(FR) weeeceescecssssecesssesssesesesesesssenens 97 02491
`Mar. 3, 1997
`(SL)
`Tint, C07 cececcsssccsssscsssessssssnsesessesssnseseee HO4L 12/16
`
`...
`... 370/349; 375/267
`(52) U.S. Cl.
`(58) Field of Search 0... 375/267, 299,
`375/347, 138; 370/319-321, 344, 347, 349,
`440, 441, 474, 395; 714/822
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3,906,445 *
`4,133,504 *
`4,400,811 *
`4,518,947 *
`
`9/1975 Beckmann et al. ccc 714/22
`1/1979 Dobleretal.
`wa 714/822
`.
`8/1983 Brownet al.
`«. 714/822
`5/1985 Poston et al. wees 375/267
`
`
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`Primary Examiner—Salvatore Cangialosi
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Sughrue, Mion, Zinn,
`Macpeak & Seas, PLLC
`(57)
`ABSTRACT
`
`The invention concerns a method of communication used in
`a shared resource transmission system. In accordance with
`the inventionit consists in sendingat least two identical data
`packets without waiting for an acknowledgement of recep-
`tion between sending said data packets.
`
`‘The invention can reduce call set-up time compared to the
`prior art and applies in particular to satellite transmission.
`
`8 Claims, 1 Drawing Sheet
`
`Pn(°%/o)
`
`
`10.0 SSSSSSSSS
`ee
`
`0aafTCOTCee
`
`
`
`
`7
`mLWAZA|dd ie
`
`10-—==
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4&4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1006
`
`APPLE 1006
`
`1
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 2, 2001
`
`US 6,298,052 B1
`
`Pn(°/o)
`
`FIG.1
`
`nt AL
`
`AL
`
`|
`
`ct
`
`100 -—I (S$AH. P|
`C(°/o)
`
`2
`
`

`

`US 6,298,052 B1
`
`1
`COMMUNICATION METHOD USED IN A
`SHARED RESOURCE TRANSMISSION
`SYSTEM
`
`The field of the invention is that of transmitting data in
`a shared resource transmission system. To be more precise,
`the present
`invention concerns an ALOHAtype shared
`resource transmission system that can be used to set up
`transmission between a calling station and a called station,
`for example via satellite. In the case of transmission via
`satellite the stations are typically earth stations.
`Considerfirst the context of transmitting data in packets
`via a shared resource for setting up a call between a calling
`station and a called station. Call set-up is a phase preceding
`communication proper and its function is to allocate a
`resource reserved to the call in question.
`The random ALOHAaccess system is used prior to call
`set-up. This system entails a calling station sending a data
`packet called the access packet for the attention of a called
`station using for this purpose a resource shared with other
`stations. The shared resourceis typically a carrier frequency.
`The various stations share the resource without any prior
`reservation of time slots and without any temporal synchro-
`nization of the stations. Because there is no reservation,
`collisions can occur between access packets sent by different
`stations. To compensate this risk of collision a station
`sending a first access packet
`that does not receive any
`acknowledgement message from the called station sends a
`second access packet via the shared resource after a par-
`ticular time-delay starting from sending the first access
`packet.
`Assuming that there is no correlation between the send-
`ing of access packets by the variousstations, in other words
`that the sending of the packets obeys Poisson’s law,
`the
`probability P of a collision between access packets occurring
`is equalto:
`P=1-e°R?
`
`where R is the average numberof packets transmitted per
`second and T is the duration of a packet. The digit 2 indicates
`that a collision occurs if two packets of duration T are
`transmitted within a time window of duration 2T.
`
`To overcomethis drawback it has been decidedto provide
`time windows of duration T during which stations are
`authorized to send access packets. In this case the various
`stations are temporally synchronized. This system is known
`as the slotted ALOHAsystem. In this case the probability P
`of a collision between access packets occurring is equalto:
`P=1-¢77?F
`
`the number r of access packets transmitted
`Accordingly,
`without repetition is generally written:
`r=R*eRF
`
`with k=1 for the slotted ALOHA system and k=2 for the
`random ALOHAsystem.
`The main drawback of these two types of access system
`is the high number of repetitions of access packets, which
`commensurately increases call set-up time. This problem is
`serious in the case of transmission viasatellite because of the
`
`distance traveled by the access packets between the sending
`station and the station to which the access packets are
`addressed.
`
`Packets of data can also be transmitted using ALOHA
`systems,slotted or otherwise. In this case the packets are not
`access packets but packets of data as such used for the call
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`between the calling station and the called station. The data
`packets convey alarm, supervisory, etc data. The same
`problem arises for these data packets as that which has
`previously arisen for access packets.
`One aim of the present invention is to solve these prob-
`lems.
`To be more precise, one aim of the invention is to reduce
`the numberof collisions between data packets transmitted
`by a station in a system where the senders of such packets
`use the same resource.
`This aim and others that will become apparent hereinafter
`are achieved by a method of communication used in a shared
`resource transmission system characterized in that it consists
`in sendingat least two identical data packets without waiting
`for an acknowledgementof reception between sending said
`data packets.
`The above method is advantageously used to set up a call
`and in this case the aforementioned data packets are access
`packets.
`The above method is advantageously employed in a
`satellite transmission system either for call set-up or for
`communication proper.
`The data packets preferably each include data for detect-
`ing a collision between the data packets transmitted on the
`shared resource.
`The packets can be transmitted with a temporal spacing
`and/or on different carrier frequencies and/or using code-
`division multiple access (CDMA).
`The invention applies to a slotted or otherwise ALOHA
`type shared resource transmission system.
`Other features and advantages of the invention will
`become apparent from a reading of the following description
`of one preferred embodiment given by way of non-limiting
`illustration and from the appended drawings in which:
`FIG. 1 showsthe probability of collision between data
`packets as a function of the load on the temporally shared
`resource for n=1 through 7 where n is the numberof times
`the same data packet is sent during a predetermined time
`period for a random ALOHAaccess system;
`FIG. 2 shows the probability of collision between data
`packets as a function of the load on the temporally shared
`resource for n=1 through 7 where n is the numberof times
`the same data packet is sent during a predetermined time
`period for a slotted ALOHAaccess system.
`The following description concerns a transmission system
`in whichthe data packets transmitted via the shared resource
`are access packets for setting up a call between a calling
`station and a called station.
`To limit call set-up time and therefore the probability of
`collision of access packets transmitted by a station the
`invention proposesthat each station requiring to set up a call
`should transmit at least two access packets without waiting
`for an acknowledgement between sending the access pack-
`ets. To be more precise, the invention proposes to send the
`same access packet n times (n>1) in a given time period
`whether an acknowledgement messageis received from the
`station to which these packets are sent or not.
`The transmission is done within a time period less than
`that required for a roundtrip of a packet betweenthe calling
`station and the called station.
`The probability that the called station has not received the
`transmitted message is equal to the probability that all the
`packets transmitted have collided with other packets. This
`probability is written:
`Paap'a(i-esry
`
`The total number R of packets transmitted via the shared
`resource is therefore equal to the sum of the n*r original
`3
`
`3
`
`

`

`US 6,298,052 B1
`
`3
`packets and the R/n messages repeated with the probability
`P,,, that is:
`
`R
`n
`R=n«rt+R«P, or r= —x[l—-(l—-e7)"]
`
`The effect of the invention can be seen in FIG. 1 which
`showsthe probability of collision between access packets as
`a function of the load on the temporally shared resource for
`n=1 through 7 where n is the number of times the same
`access package is sent during a predetermined time period
`for a random ALOHAaccess system. Here the packet error
`rate is 1%.
`The characteristic 10 corresponds to the prior art (n=1),
`Le. for a 4% load C on the shared resource a single access
`packet transmitted has a 10% probability of colliding with
`another packet. In this case it will be necessary to send the
`packet again.
`Characteristics 11 through 16 respectively correspond to
`transmission of n=2 through n=7 access packets in a given
`time period without waiting for an acknowledgement from
`the destination station. For n=2 and for the same 4% load C
`on the shared resource the probability P,, that the destination
`station has not received any of these packets correctly drops
`to around 2.5%, that is four times less than for n=1. The
`higher the value of n the greater the probability that at least
`one packet transmitted will be received correctly by the
`destination station. Note however that
`this process has
`limitations whenthe load C is high: in this case, the higher
`the number n of access packets transmitted the greater the
`risk of collisions.
`if the sending
`The invention is of increased benefit
`stations are temporally synchronized. The packets are then
`transmitted in accordance with the slotted ALOHAsystem.
`FIG. 2 shows the probability of collision between data
`packets as a function of the load on the temporally shared
`resource for n=1 through 7 where n is the numberof times
`the same data packet is sent during a predetermined time
`period for a slotted ALOHAaccess system. Here the packet
`error rate is also 1%.
`The characteristic 20 corresponds to the prior art (n=1),
`that is to say for an 8% load C onthe shared resource a single
`access packet transmitted has a 10% probability of colliding
`with another packet.
`Characteristics 21 through 26 respectively correspond to
`transmission of n=2 through n=7 access packets in a given
`time period without waiting for an acknowledgement from
`the destination station. It can be seen that for n=7 and for the
`
`same 8% load C on the shared resource the probability P,,
`that the destination station has not received any of these
`packets correctly drops to 0.3%. The phenomenon seen in
`FIG. 1 is no longer seen in FIG. 2 as it occurs for a load C
`greater than 10%.
`The systematic repetition of the access packets in the
`predefined time period therefore increases the probability
`that at least one of these packets will reach the destination
`station, which reduces the time necessary to set up a call.
`The n packets transmitted can be transmitted on the same
`carrier frequency and spaced in time, preferably at random.
`Another solution is to transmit these packets on different
`carrier frequencies, possibly in combination with a temporal
`distribution. Other implementations are possible,
`for
`example CDMA modetransmission in which the packets
`transmitted are by access codes,
`for example Walsh
`sequences.
`
`10
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`4
`The invention is particularly beneficial whenit is applied
`to call set-up via satellite. In this case the probability of
`having to retransmit one or more access packets is much
`lowerthan in the prior art and it is not necessary to wait to
`confirm non-reception of a message acknowledging recep-
`tion before retransmitting. For a satellite link the time saving
`is that required for the radio signal to perform a roundtrip
`between the stations that are to enter into communication,
`ie. approximately 0.6 seconds for a geostationary orbit
`satellite.
`
`The invention applies equally to transmission systems in
`which access by sending stations, for example mobiles, to
`one or more destination stations, for example fixed stations,
`is in accordance with the ALOHA system as described
`above.
`
`The access packets transmitted advantageously each
`include a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) codeor other data
`for detecting whether there has been a collision between the
`packets transmitted.
`The aim of the CRCis to detect transmission errors. It
`
`therefore enables the addressee to determine if the message
`has been transmitted correctly.
`If n messages are sent
`simultaneously it indicates that at least one message has
`been transmitted correctly. Moreover,if the n messages were
`to arrive with different field values, it enables the receiver to
`tell which of the messages are good. It therefore provides
`additional security in terms of channel quality (not just in
`terms of collisions).
`Of course, the invention is not limited to call set-up and
`is equally directed to the sending of data packets
`(information packets) during a call between twostations.
`Whatis claimedis:
`
`1. Amethodof setting up a call between a calling station
`and a called station in a shared resource transmission
`
`system, the method comprising sending from said calling
`station to said called station at least two identical access data
`
`packets within a predetermined time period without waiting
`for an acknowledgementof reception between sending said
`access data packets, wherein said predetermined time period
`is less than a time period required for a roundtrip of a packet
`between the calling station and the called station.
`2. A method according to claim 1, wherein said shared
`resource transmission system is a satellite transmission
`system.
`3. A method according to claim 1, wherein said access
`data packets each include data for detecting collision
`between data packets transmitted over said shared resource.
`4. A method according to claim 1, wherein said access
`data packets are transmitted spaced in time.
`5. A method according to claim 1, wherein said data
`packets are transmitted on different carrier frequencies.
`6. A method according to claim 1, wherein said access
`data packets are transmitted by code-division multiple
`access.
`
`7. A method according to claim 1, wherein said shared
`resource transmission system is a non-slotted ALOHA
`shared resource transmission system.
`8. A method according to claim 1, wherein said shared
`resource transmission system is a slotted ALOHA shared
`resource transmission system.
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket