throbber
Treatment of Convulsive
`
`and Nonconvulsive
`
`Status Epilepticus
`Trudy Pang, MD
`*
`Lawrence J. Hirsch, MD
`
`Address
`
`'Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Columbia University, Neurological
`Institute, Box NI-135, 710 W. 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.
`E-mail: ljh3@columbia.edu
`
`Current Treatment Options in Neurology 2005, 7:247—259
`Current Science Inc. ISSN 1092-8480
`Copyright © 2005 by Current Science Inc.
`
`Opinion statement
`
`Status epilepticus (SE) should be treated as quickly as possible with full doses of medica-
`tions as detailed in a written hospital protocol. Lorazepam is the drug of choice for initial
`treatment. If intravenous access is not immediately available, then rectal diazepam or
`nasal or buccal midazolam should be given. Prehospital treatment of seizures by emer-
`gency personnel is effective and safe, and may prevent cases of refractory SE. Home treat-
`ment of prolonged seizures or clusters with buccal, nasal, or rectal benzodiazepines
`should be considered for all at-risk patients. Nonconvulsive SE is underdiagnosed. An
`electroencephalogram should be obtained immediately in anyone with unexplained alter-
`ation of behavior or mental status and after convulsive SE if the patient does not rapidly
`awaken. Delay in diagnosis of SE is associated with a worse outcome and a higher likeli-
`hood of poor response to treatment. For refractory SE, continuous intravenous midazolam
`and propofol (alone or in combination) are rapidly effective. Randomized trials are
`needed to determine the best treatment for SE after lorazepam.
`
`Status epilepticus (SE) is a medical and neurologic
`emergency. Overall, mortality is approximately 17% to
`23% [1,2]. An additional 10% to 23% of patients who
`survive SE are left with new or disabling neurologic def-
`icits [2,3]. The varied presentation of nonconvulsive SE
`(NCSE) can lead to misdiagnosis or delayed treatment.
`This article will review the recent literature pertaining to
`early, efficient recognition and management of SE.
`
`DEFINITION AND CLASSIFICATION
`
`Status epilepticus has traditionally been defined as con-
`tinuous or repetitive seizure activity persisting for at
`least 30 minutes without recovery of consciousness
`between attacks [4]. Recent revisions of this definition
`gradually shortened the duration of SE. Because isolated
`seizures rarely last more than 5 minutes, the current
`operational definition of SE is 5 minutes or more of
`continuous seizures or two or more discrete seizures
`with incomplete recovery of consciousness between sei-
`
`zures [5]. From a clinical standpoint, the most practical
`definition is any patient who is still seizing.
`There are many different types of SE. The simplest
`classification scheme divides SE into two major types:
`convulsive and nonconvulsive, based on whether or not
`there is rhythmic jerking. Generalized convulsive status
`epilepticus (GCSE), including generalized tonic-clonic,
`myoclonic, tonic, and clonic, is more easily recognized
`than NCSE. However, as GCSE continues, the overt symp-
`toms usually evolve into subtler features, such as subtle
`twitching of the face or limbs, or nystagmus [6]. Some
`patients may not show any motor symptoms of seizure
`and therefore have nonconvulsive status epilepticus. It is
`this group of patients who often evade early diagnosis
`because NCSE has protean manifestations, ranging from
`slight alteration of consciousness to coma. In the inten—
`sive care unit (ICU), most seizures are nonconvulsive and
`would not be noticed without electroencephalography
`(EEG) [70-]. Some clinicians attempt to classify NCSE
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1107 Page 0001
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1107 Page 0001
`
`

`

`Epilepsy
`248
`m
`
`based on its site of onset; however, practically, it often is
`not possible to distinguish between NCSE of generalized
`onset and NCSE ofpartial onset with bilateral spread.
`
`ETIOLOGY
`
`The most frequent cause of SE is a prior history of epi—
`lepsy (22% to 26%). However, more than half of epi—
`sodes of SE occur in patients without prior seizures. In
`these patients, stroke (19% to 20%) is the most fre-
`quent cause, followed by remote causes (16%), toxic-
`metabolic encephalopathy (12% to 18%), alcohol
`and/or drugs (8% to 15%), tumor (4% to 20%), car—
`diac arrest or hypoxia-ischemia (4% to 12%), infec-
`tion of the central nervous system (CNS) or other
`infection (4% to 7%), traumatic brain injury (2% to
`5%), and idiopathic or unknown causes (2% to 15%)
`[2;8, Class III; 9]. Metabolic etiologies include: low
`glucose, calcium, sodium, magnesium and phosphate
`(the latter particularly in alcoholic patients); high glu-
`cose, osmolality, blood urea nitrogen or creatinine;
`medication toxicity (theophylline, imipenem, iso-
`niazid [treat with pyridoxine], clozapine, cyclosporine
`and related drugs, fentanyl, meperidine, pro-
`poxyphene, bupropion, and high dose intravenous
`[IV] beta-lactam antibiotics); withdrawal from medi-
`cations and drugs (benzodiazepines, barbiturates,
`alcohol); and acute intoxication from illicit drugs,
`especially cocaine.
`
`DIAGNOSIS OF STATUS EPILEPTICUS AND NONCONVUL-
`SIVE STATUS EPILEPTICUS
`
`Early recognition of SE allows for prompt treatment and
`increases the likelihood of treatment success. Typically,
`patients who present with CCSE are expected to awaken
`gradually after the motor features of seizures disappear.
`If the mental status remains depressed 20 to 60 minutes
`after the convulsions cease, NCSE must be considered
`and urgent EEC is advised.
`
`Nonconvulsive seizures and NCSE are much more
`common than previously recognized, particularly in
`patients who are in the intensive care unit. Risk factors for
`nonconvulsive seizures or NCSE include severely impaired
`mental status of any cause, young age (<18 years), prior
`clinical seizures or remote epilepsy risk factors, and ocular
`movement abnormalities (sustained deviation, nystag-
`mus, or hippus) [700,10]. In one study, more than 50% of
`96 comatose patients undergoing continuous EEC moni-
`toring had nonconvulsive seizures [ 7"].
`Any fluctuating or unexplained alteration in behav-
`ior or mental status warrants an EEG and consideration
`ofNCSE. Delays in the recognition of NCSE are associ-
`ated with poor outcome and lessen the likelihood of
`successful seizure control [110].
`
`CONSEQUENCES OF STATUS EPILEPTICUS
`Patients who present with a first episode of SE are at
`increased risk for development of epilepsy compared
`with those with a single, brief first episode of seizure
`[12]. Status epilepticus after stroke has been shown to
`be associated with a much higher mortality, indepen—
`dent of stroke size and location [13]. In CCSE and
`NCSE, long seizure duration and delay to diagnosis are
`independent predictors of poor outcome after control-
`ling for etiology [110,14]. There are several reported
`cases of prolonged nonconvulsive seizures alone caus-
`ing permanent CNS injury or worsening [15, Class III].
`In patients with intracerebral hemorrhage, nonconvul-
`sive seizures are associated with increased mass effect
`and shift after controlling for hemorrhage size [160,
`Class II]. SE also can cause nonneurologic abnormali-
`ties, including acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, renal failure,
`arrhythmias, and aspiration. Fever, hypotension,
`hypoxia, and metabolic abnormalities accelerate sei—
`zure-related neuronal injury and should be corrected
`aggressively. The best way to prevent these adverse
`effects is to stop the seizure activity as soon as possible.
`
`Treatment
`
`General principles
`
`0 Early cessation of seizures is the key in the management of SE. Treatment
`strategies should focus on several aspects: early termination of seizure,
`identification of the cause, prevention of seizure recurrence, and treatment
`of secondary complications.
`
`0 As summarized in Table 1, initial steps in the management of SE involve
`basic life support. Patients should receive 100% oxygen by nasal cannula or
`nonrebreather mask, and may require intubation if there is evidence of res-
`piratory failure. Patients should not be pharmacologically paralyzed for
`intubation unless continuous EEC is being recorded, or unless absolutely
`necessary. IV access should be established quickly to administer drugs nec-
`essary for seizure control and resuscitation, but rectal, buccal, or nasal ben-
`zodiazepines should be given if there is any delay in obtaining IV access
`(see below). Fever and hypotension should be treated concurrently. Labora-
`
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1107 Page 0002
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1107 Page 0002
`
`

`

`Treatment of Convulsive and Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus Pang and Hirsch
`
`249
`
`Table 1. Treatment protocol for status epilepticus in adults
`
`wT
`
`ime, min
`
`Action
`
`0 to 5
`
`6 to 10
`
`10 to 20
`20 to 60
`
`60
`
`Diagnose; give supplemental 02; check ABC; obtain IV access; begin EKG and blood pressure monitoring;
`draw blood for basic metabolic panel: Mg, Ca, phosphate, CBC, Ll-Ts, AED levels, arterial blood gas; do
`toxicology screen.*
`Thiamine 100 mg IV; give 50 mL 050 IV unless adequate glucose known. Lorazepam 4 mg IV over 2 min; if the
`patient is still seizing, repeat once in 5 min. If there is no rapid IV access, give diazepam 20 mg rectally or
`midazolam 10 mg intranasally, buccally, or intramuscularly.T
`If seizures persist, begin fosphenytoin 20 mg/kg IV at 150 mg/min, with blood pressure and EKG monitoring.
`If seizures persist, give one of four options:i 1) give cIV midazolam at a loading dosage of 0.2 mg/kg; repeat
`0.2 to 0.4 mg/kg boluses every 5 minutes until seizures stop, up to a maximum total loading dose of 2 mg/
`kg. Initial cIV rate is 0.1 mg/kg/hr. cIV dose range: 0.05 - 2 mg/kg/hr. If still seizing, proceed to cIV pro-
`pofol or pentobarbital; or 2) give cIV propofol at a loading dosage of 1 to 2 mg/kg. Repeat 1 to 2 mg/kg
`boluses every 3 to 5 minutes until seizures stop, up to maximum total loading dose of 10 mg/kg. Initial cIV
`rate is 2 mg/kg/h. cIV dose range is 1 to 15 mg/kg/h. If the patient is still seizing, proceed to cIV mida-
`zolam or pentobarbital; or 3) give IV valproate 40 mg/kg over approximately 10 minutes. If the patient is
`still seizing, give an additional 20 mg/kg over approximately 5 minutes. If the patient is still seizing, pro-
`ceed to cIV midazolam or propofol; or 4) give IV phenobarbital 20 mg/kg IV at 50 to 100 mg/min. If the
`patient is still seizing, proceed to cIV midazolam, propofoi, or pentobarbital.
`Give cIV pentobarbital at a loading dosage of 5 to 10 mg/kg at up to 50 mg/min; repeat 5 mg/kg boluses
`until seizures stop. Initial cIV rate should be 1 mg/kg/h. cIV dose range is 0.5 to 10 mg/kg/h; tradition-
`ally titrated to suppression-burst on EEG. Begin EEG monitoring as soon as possible if patient does not rap-
`idly awaken or if any cIV treatment is used.
`
`*Urine and blood
`1The IV solution of diazepam can be given rectally if Diastat is not available; the IV solution of midazolam can be given by any of
`these routes
`tIntubation necessary except for valproate
`ABC— airway, breathing and circulation; AED—antiepileptic drug; CBC—complete blood count; cIV—continuous intravenous; EEG—elec-
`troencephalogram; EKG—electrocardiogram; IV—intravenous; LFT—liver function test
`
`tory studies should be sent (see Table 1). A bedside glucose level should be
`obtained, and 100 mg thiamine and 50 mL 50% glucose should be admin-
`istered if hypoglycemia is present or if glucose level is unknown. Other
`components of management include determining whether there is a his-
`tory of alcohol or drug use, previous epilepsy, or neurologic insult. A
`description of the seizure at onset should be obtained if witnessed, and
`brain imaging should be done after the patient is stable and seizures are
`controlled. For seizures caused by a metabolic abnormality, correcting the
`metabolic problem is more effective than antiepileptic drugs (AEDS).
`
`' First line medications control SE in 80% of patients when initiated within 30
`minutes, but in 40% if started after 2 hours of onset [3;8, Class III]. For practi-
`cal purposes, treatment should be started after 5 minutes of continuous sei-
`zure activity. Our protocol for treatment of SE in adults is shown in Table 1.
`
`Initial pharmacologic therapy
`
`its
`
`,
`
`. ,
`
`”W .
`'2 «i,
`
`5435,
`
`Benzodiazepines
`
`0 Benzodiazepines are potent, parenterally available medications with a
`rapid onset of action and are the preferred initial therapy. Their mechanism
`of action involves binding to high affinity sites on the y-aminobutyric acid
`(GABA) receptor, resulting in hyperpolarization of the neuronal cell mem-
`brane and decreased neuronal firing [17].
`
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1107 Page 0003
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1107 Page 0003
`
`

`

`Epilepsy
`250
`R
`
`Lorazepam
`
`Standard dosage 4 to 8 mg given intravenously (0.1 mg/kg). Onset of action is 3 to 10 minutes
`Duration of antiepileptic effects is 12 to 24 hours (slower redistribution than diaz-
`epam). Elimination half-life is 14 hours.
`
`Contraindications Hypersensitivity to drug.
`Main drug interactions Increased sedation with other CNS depressants. Lorazepain is highly protein-bound.
`Main side effects Sedation of several hours, occasional respiratory depression, hypotension.
`Special points Lorazepam is the drug of choice in the initial management of SE. It has several
`important advantages over diazepam, which has been used traditionally. Diazepam
`has a much shorter duration of antiepileptic action (approximately 15 to 30 min-
`utes), but its elimination half life of 30 hours is twice that of lorazepam, making it
`less optimal. However, the rectal preparation of diazepam can be valuable when IV
`access is not available.
`
`Midazolam Wan-w saw-mmmmmm“em“..mmm
`Give when there is no immediate IV access; see below for continuous IV drip for
`refractory SE.
`
`Standard dosage 0.2 to 0.3 mg/kg intramuscular (IM), intranasal (IN), or buccal. Onset of action is
`1 to 5 minutes.
`
`Contraindications Hypersensitivity to drug.
`Main drug interactions Increased sedation with other CNS depressants
`Main side effects Sedation, occasional respiratory depression, cardiac arrest, hypotension.
`Special points Midazolam is a water-soluble drug in acidic environments, thereby allowing for an
`intramuscular preparation in addition to the IV form [18]. It is lipid-soluble in
`physiologic pH ranges and is able to penetrate the brain to exert its anticonvulsant
`effects. When IV access cannot be established, buccal, IN or IM midazolam plays
`an important role in seizure control. Buccal and IN forms in particular are good
`alternatives for out-of-hospital settings. Continuous IV midazolam also plays a key
`role in refractory SE (discussed below).
`
`.4.“
`
`“WM
`
`w
`
`.
`
`.7...
`
`Alternative routes of administration of benzodiazepines
`0 Alternative modes of administration are particularly important in patients
`without IV access in various settings. Prompt treatment by caregivers out-
`side the hospital can shorten the duration of seizure, prevent progression to
`SE, and possibly reduce the need for emergency room visits (potentially
`lowering health care costs). Rectal, 1M, buccal, and IN all are alternatives
`which have been shown to effectively and rapidly control seizures [190,
`Class I; 20;21,22, Class III; 23;24—26, Class 1]. Currently, rectal diazepam
`gel (Diastat, Xcel Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA) available in prefilled
`syringes, is the only version approved by the United States Food and Drug
`Administration. In a randomized trial involving patients with seizure clus-
`ters, a single dose of rectal diazepam gel decreased seizure frequency signif-
`icantly and increased the chance of seizure freedom after treatment
`compared with placebo (55% vs 34%) [26, Class]. In children, IM mida-
`zolam has been shown to stop seizures more rapidly than IV diazepam
`because of earlier administration [24, Class I].
`0 Buccal and IN midazolam are easier to administer than rectal medications
`and are more socially acceptable. Two prospective studies have shown that
`IN or buccal midazolam is effective in aborting prolonged seizures in
`adults and children [22, Class III; 270, Class 1]. Scott et al. [190, Class I]
`found that in children with seizures lasting more than 5 minutes, buccal
`midazolam was as effective as rectal diazepam. In a recently presented ran-
`domized trial in children presenting to the emergency room with acute
`tonic-clonic seizures, buccal midazolam was more likely to stop seizures in
`
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1107 Page 0004
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1107 Page 0004
`
`

`

`Treatment of Convulsive and Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus Pang and Hirsch
`
`251
`
`less than 10 minutes than rectal diazepam, and had a similar (slightly
`lower) rate of respiratory depression [28, Class I]. In select patients, these
`forms of benzodiazepines also can confer the ability of patients to treat
`themselves during prolonged auras, simple partial seizures, or clusters with
`recovery between seizures.
`
`Comparison of benzodiazepines
`
`Recent studies investigating out—of-hospital treatment of SE found benzodi—
`azepines to be safe and effective when administered by paramedics for out-
`of-hospital SE in adults [29”, Class I]. In this study, 59% of patients with
`SE treated with IV lorazepam in the field were no longer seizing on arrival at
`the emergency department, compared with 43% of patients treated with IV
`diazepam, and 21% in the placebo group. Respiratory and circulatory com-
`plications were higher in the placebo group (22.5%) than in the diazepam
`and lorazepam groups (10% to 11%). In an older randomized trial compar-
`ing 4 mg IV lorazepam to 10 mg IV diazepam, SE was controlled in 89% of
`patients in the lorazepam group, compared with 76% in the diazepam
`group, and there were no significant differences in side effects [30 Class I].
`The clinical bottom line is that when IV access is available, IV lorazepam
`should be initiated as first—line therapy, and if possible, in the prehospital
`phase. If widely practiced, this type of treatment could have a major impact
`on the prevention of refractory status epilepticus. Whenever obtaining IV
`access would delay administration ofAEDs significantly, diazepam should
`be given rectally (0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg for SE; usually 20 mg for an adult), or
`midazolam should be given nasally, buccally, or intramuscularly (0.2 to 0.3
`mg/kg; usually 10 to 15 mg for an adult). Patients with a history ofpro-
`longed seizures or acute repetitive seizures should be offered rectal diaz-
`epam, or nasal or buccal midazolam for out-of-hospital use.
`
`Most patients who respond to first-line agents also will require mainte-
`nance therapy with a second-line agent because the risk of recurrence is
`high. Additionally, second-line therapy must be initiated quickly when
`patients continue to seize despite treatment with benzodiazepines. The
`longer SE persists, the higher the risk for developing refractory status epi-
`lepticus. If convulsions are successfully abated but patients fail to improve
`in their mental status, there is a high probability of ongoing subclinical sei-
`zures or NCSE. Such cases warrant additional treatment. DeLorenzo et al.
`[31, Class II] found subclinical electrographic seizure activity in 48% of
`patients after control ofconvulsive SE, including NCSE in 14%. Towne et al.
`[320, Class III] found that among 236 comatose patients with no current or
`past evidence of seizures, 8% showed electrographic seizures. In the Veteran
`Affair Cooperative study, 20% of convulsive SE patients whose movements
`stopped with treatment still were seizing as shown by EEC [33", Class 1].
`Therefore, EEG is mandatory for all patients who do not wake up quickly
`after cessation of clinical SE, and for all patients with unexplained coma.
`
`Second-line pharmacotherapy
`
`Phenytoin
`
`‘MWymmc—nwvvuAWHMVV “WWW/a. ..M_.~.mn m, .mawm...“ vavmw/maw “twang.
`'rnwmi my... MW v4
`The primary mechanism of action of phenytoin is inhibition of high-frequency“
`repetitive neuronal firing by blocking voltage-dependent sodium channels [34]. It
`is the most commonly used second-line therapy in status epilepticus.
`Standard dosage 20 mg/kg load given intravenously. The maximum infusion rate is 50 mg/min. Max-
`imal effect is achieved in 20 to 25 minutes.
`
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1107 Page 0005
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1107 Page 0005
`
`

`

`Epilepsy
`252
`xx
`
`Contraindications
`
`Main drug interactions
`
`Main side effects
`
`Special points
`
`Hypersensitivity to drug, heart block. Use caution if there is impaired liver or
`renal function.
`
`Highly protein-bound (>90°/o). Phenytoin may displace other drugs that are pro-
`tein-bound and increase free levels of other drugs. Also induces hepatic metabo-
`lism of many medications, including other AEDs.
`Cardiac arrhythmias (bradycardia, ectopic beats), hypotension, hepatotoxicity,
`pancytopenia, phlebitis, soft tissue injury from extravasation, purple glove syn-
`drome, allergy including Stevens-Johnson syndrome.
`During and after SE, the target free-phenytoin level should be 1.5 to 2.5 pg/ml,
`equivalent to a total phenytoin level of 15 to 25 pg/mL in the presence of normal
`protein binding. Daily serum levels should be followed. Free phenytoin levels can
`become very high in patients with low albumin (malnutrition, critical illness, liver
`insufficiency) or those who are on other highly protein-bound drugs such as ben-
`zodiazepines and valproate. It cannot be mixed with glucose or dextrose because
`of precipitation and should not be given in small peripheral veins or IM.
`
`Fosphenytoin
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fosphenytoin is a phenytoin prodrug without the propylene glycol carrier and has
`fewer side effects. It is quickly dephosphorylated to phenytoin when given IM or
`IV. IV fosphenytoin is preferred to IV phenytoin because of its water solubility and
`normal pH, thereby allowing more rapid administration with less irritation of veins,
`less hypotension during administration, no risk of skin necrosis or purple glove
`syndrome with extravasation, and compatibility with all IV fluids. It is dosed as
`phenytoin-equivalents.
`
`20 mg/kg load given intravenously. The maximum infusion rate is 150 mg/min
`(three times the rate of phenytoin). If patients continue to seize after receiving 20
`mg/kg, an additional 5 to 10 mg/kg may be given. It also can be given intramus-
`cularly, with low therapeutic levels reached in 30 minutes and peak levels in 2
`hours, but this is too slow for convulsive SE. The elimination half-life is 10 to 15
`minutes (for conversion to phenytoin).
`See phenytoin.
`See phenytoin.
`
`Lower risk of hypotension than phenytoin (5% to 15%, rate dependent). Arrhyth-
`mias and respiratory depression are rare. Decreased consciousness, transient pruri-
`tus (in as many as 50% of awake patients, not an allergic reaction; often in the
`groin; possibly attributable to phosphate load) also are possible. Cardiac complica-
`tions still can occur with fosphenytoin. Blood pressure and electrocardiograms
`should be monitored well after infusion ends because phenytoin is effectively still
`being loaded for more than 15 minutes after the end of the infusion. Otherwise the
`side effects are the same as phenytoin.
`See phenytoin for target serum levels. Serum phenytoin levels should be obtained
`2 hours after an IV load or 4 hours after IM delivery to allow complete conversion
`to phenytoin.
`
`Standard dosage
`
`Contraindications
`
`Main drug interactions
`Main side effects
`
`Special points
`
`Phenobarbital
`WWW. “mm.“mma..m.VW/.m»mmm~m.¢mwwmWV N ,

`WWW” m, ‘ WW u umWVr‘ an... m...» c mm,“ WWW/mm. .......mm...-~mw .»mmm~,ww—m.wu
`Phenobarbitafis one of the long acting barbiturates that act by potentiation of ye
`aminobutyric acid (GABA) and by interfering with sodium and potassium transport
`across the cell membrane.
`
`Standard dosage
`
`Contraindications
`
`Main drug interactions
`
`Main side effects
`
`Special points
`
`15 to 20 mg/kg given intravenously. The maximum infusion rate is 50 to 100 mg/
`min. The elimination half life is 72 hours.
`
`Hypersensitivity to drug, severe liver dysfunction.
`Increased respiratory depression, sedation, and hypotension are possible, espe—
`cially when given in conjunction with benzodiazepines.
`Respiratory depression (patients often need intubation), prolonged sedation,
`allergy including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, blood dyscrasias.
`Target serum levels are 30 to 45 pg/mL initially, but some patients may need
`higher levels.
`
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1107 Page 0006
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1107 Page 0006
`
`

`

`Treatment of Convulsive and Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus Pang and Hirsch
`
`253
`
`,VafPfqate,
`
`_,
`
`,.
`
`Although currently notapproved by the United States Food and Drug Administra-
`tion for use in SE, several small case series suggest good efficacy for IV valproate
`in the treatment of different types of SE, including partial onset, nonconvulsive,
`absence, and myoclonic SE [35,36]. In a recent review of 63 patients, IV valproate
`was infused at an average dose of 31.5 mg/kg (range, 10 to 78 mg/kg), an average
`rate of 200 mg/min (range, 200 to 500 mg/min) [37]. An overall efficacy of 63.3%
`was achieved when used as a second, third, or fourth drug. It was well-tolerated
`with hypotension occurring in only three patients.
`20 mg/kg load given intravenously; however, in the presence of enzyme-inducing
`drugs such as phenytoin, phenobarbital, or carbamazepine, higher dosages of 40 to
`60 mg/kg are needed. Maximum bolus rate: approved for rates up to 3 mg/kg/min
`for a total loading dose of up to 15 mg/kg (although we and others give much
`larger loading dosages as above). Faster rates have been well-tolerated, including
`5 to 6 mg/kg/min [35,38].
`
`Hypersensitivity to drug, severe liver dysfunction, thrombocytopenia.
`Because of the interaction between phenytoin and valproic acid, which are heavily
`protein-bound AEDs, it is important to follow unbound (free) leveLs, especially of
`phenytoin, to avoid toxicity.
`Hepatotoxicity (including fatal), thrombocytopenia, pancreatitis. Hypotension is
`rare but has been reported [39].
`Target serum levels are 70 to 140 ug/mL for SE. There is minimal sedation (intuba-
`tion may be avoided); therefore, it is particularly useful for refractory SE in a
`patient who has a "do not intubate" status.
`
`Standard dosage
`
`Contraindications
`
`Major drug interactions
`
`Main side effects
`
`Special points
`
`
` Comparison of initial treatment options for status epilepticus
`' Only a few prospective randomized trials have been done comparing treat-
`ment strategies for SE; some were discussed above. The largest prospective
`study was the VA Status Epilepticus Cooperative study [3300, Class I],
`which was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial that compared
`four IV treatments: lorazepam, diazepam followed by phenytoin, phe—
`nobarbital, and phenytoin alone. In generalized convulsive SE, lorazepam
`was found to be most effective (65% for lorazepam alone vs 58% for phe-
`nobarbital, 56% for diazepam plus phenytoin, and 44% for phenytoin
`alone). The difference was statistically significant between lorazepam and
`phenytoin only. For subtle SE, no statistical difference was found between
`the groups and the response rate was poor. All four treatment arms had
`similar complication rates.
`
`Refractory status epilepticus
`
`0 Refractory SE (RSE) is defined as persistent convulsive SE or NCSE despite
`the use of two agents (usually a benzodiazepine plus another drug, typi-
`cally phenytoin). The next step of treatment usually is use of continuous
`drips or high doses of medications that may cause significant sedation, res—
`piratory depression, and hypotension. Patients most often at this point
`have been intubated and transferred to the intensive care unit. The available
`agents include barbiturates (pentobarbital, thiopental, or high dose phe-
`nobarbital), propofol, and midazolam. The traditional treatment algorithm
`suggests loading with phenobarbital at this point, followed by continuous
`IV pentobarbital if that fails. Our preference is to use rapid-acting drips
`(midazolam or propofol) instead of phenobarbital after a patient has failed
`first— and second-line drugs.
`
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1107 Page 0007
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1107 Page 0007
`
`

`

`
`
`254 EpilepsyK
`
`0 To date, no randomized controlled trials have been done for second-line
`therapy or for SE refractory to first— and second—line therapy. The most expe-
`rience exists with continuous infusions (clV) of midazolam and propofol.
`There is some preliminary evidence from two small retrospective series that
`propofol is effective, fast, and easy to use [40,41, Class [II], but may be asso-
`ciated with a higher mortality than midazolam (but not statistically differ—
`ent). In a systematic review of the literature on treatment of 193 patients
`with RSE, no difference was found in mortality among the groups treated
`with cIV propofol, cIV midazolam, or cIV pentobarbital [42, Class III].
`Mortality was related to the patient’s age and duration of SE rather than
`AED choice. The safety of propofol was additionally supported in a more
`recent retrospective series by Rossetti et al. [430, Class III], in which 27
`patients who failed IV clonazepam and phenytoin therapy were induced
`into burst-suppression pattern on cEEG with cIV propofol at a dose of 2.1
`to 13 mg/kg/h for 1 to 9 days while continuing clonazepam infusions.
`Seven deaths (23%) were reported but none were attributable directly to
`propofol use and no patient experienced propofol infusion syndrome. A
`systematic review by Claassen et al. [42, Class III]
`(published before the
`Rossetti propofol study) found no demonstrable difference between propo-
`fol and midazolam for clinical endpoints such as acute treatment failure,
`breakthrough seizures, or posttreatment seizures. Pentobarbital seemed to
`have had a lower frequency of acute treatment failure and breakthrough sei-
`zures, but this was confounded by two factors. First, the pentobarbital was
`infused until background burst suppression was reached, whereas the other
`two drugs usually were titrated to seizure control, not burst-suppression.
`Second, most patients on pentobarbital did not have continuous EEG mon-
`itoring. In our experience and others, most breakthrough seizures in RSE
`patients are subclinical (89%), and would be missed in the absence of con-
`tinuous EEG monitoring [31, Class II; 440, Class III]. Hypotension, which
`further complicates the treatment of these critically ill patients, occurred
`more frequently with pentobarbital (titrated to EEC background suppres-
`sion) than with propofol or midazolam (usually titrated to suppression of
`seizures) [42, Class III].
`
`
`
`
`Continuous intravenous antiepileptics for refractory status epilepticus in adults
`0 All patients on CIV AEDs require continuous EEG monitoring.
`
`Continuous intravenous pentobarbita
`
`Standard dosage 5 to 10 mg/kg bolus. Repeat 5 mg/kg boluses until seizures stop. Maximum bolus
`rate is 25 to 50 mg/min (if blood pressure permits). The initial infusion rate is 1
`mg/kg/h. The usual maintenance range is 0.5 to 10 mg/kg/h, traditionally titrated
`to suppression-burst on EEG. The elimination half life is 15 to 60 hours.
`
`Contraindication Hypersensitivity to drug.
`Main side effects Prolonged coma (usually days after infusion is stopped), hypotension (usually
`requires vasopressors), myocardial depression, immune suppression, ileus, allergy
`including Stevens-Johnson syndrome.
`
`
`
`Continuous intravenous midazolam
`
`Standard dosage 0.2 mg/kg bolus. Repeat 0.2 to 0.4 mg/kg boluses every 5 minutes until seizures
`stop, up to a maximum total loading dose of 2 mg/kg. The initial infusion rate is
`0.1 mg/kg/h. The usual maintenance range is 0.05 to 2 mg/kg/h (this is higher
`than dosages in older literature). For breakthrough seizures, an additional bolus
`can be given, and the cIV rate should be increased by 20%. SE usually stops in less
`
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1107 Page 0008
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1107 Page 0008
`
`

`

`Treatment of Convulsive and Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus Pang and Hirsch
`
`255
`
`Contraindications
`Main side effects
`
`than 1 hour. Duration of antiepileptic effects is minutes to hours. The elimination
`half-life is 1.5 to 3.5 hours initially. With prolonged use, there may be tolerance,
`tachyphylaxis, and significant prolongation of half-life, up to days [45].
`Hypersensitivity to drug.
`
`Sedation of minutes to several hours and possibly days with prolonged use, respira-
`tory depression, occasional hypotension.
`
`Continuous intravenous propofol
`
`Starting dosage
`
`Contraindications
`Main side effects
`
`Special points
`
`Propofol is a GABA-A agonist that suppresses seizure activity via GABA-mediated
`inhibition of neuronal firing. Other mechanisms of action include inhibition of the
`N~methyl-D-aspartate receptor and modulation of calcium influx through slow cal-
`cium ion channels.
`
`1 mg/kg bolus. Repeat 1 to 2 mg/kg boluses every 3 to 5 minutes until seizures stop,
`up to maximum loading dose of 10 mg/kg. Initial cIV rate is 2 mg/kg/h. Continuous
`IV dosage range is 1 to 15 mg/kg/h. SE usually sto

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket