throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ELSEVIER
`
`International Journal of Pharmaceutics 212.(2001) 29-40
`
`
`
`international
`journal of
`pharmaceutics
`
`www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpharm
`
`Cyclodextrin solubilization of benzodiazepines: formulation
`of midazolam nasal spray
`
`T. Loftsson **, H. Guémundsdottir >, J.F. Sigurjonsdéttir *, H.H. Sigurdsson?,
`S.D. Sigfisson *, M. Masson *, E. Stefansson °
`" Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Iceland, P.O. Box 7210, IS-127 Reykjavik, Iceland
`> Department of Ophthalmology, University of Iceland, Landspitali (the University Hospital), IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland
`
`Received 9 May 2000; received in revised form 15 September 2000; accepted [9 September 2000
`
`Abstract
`
`The cyclodextrin solubilization of three benzodiazepines, ic. alprazolam, midazolam and triazolam, was investi-
`gated. The cyclodextrin solubilization was enhanced through ring-opening of the benzodiazepine rings and ionization
`of the ring-open forms. Additional enhancement was obtained through interaction of a water-soluble polymer with
`‘the cyclodextrin complexes. The ring-opening was pH-dependent and completely reversible, the ring-open forms
`dominating at low pH but the ring-closed forms at physiologic pH. The ring-closed forms were rapidly regenerated
`upon elevation of pH. In freshly collected human serum in vitro at 37°C, the half-life for the first-order rate constant
`for the ring-closing reaction was estimatedtto be less than 2min for both alprazolam and midazolam. Midazolam (17
`
`mg/ml) was so
`ze
`14%.(v/v) sulfobutylether B-cyclodextrin,
`0.1% (w/v) hye
`ypropy!‘methylcellulose, preservatives andbuffersalts.‘Six healthy volunteers received0.06:1g/kg
`
`midazolam intranasally and 2 mg intravenously, and blood samples were collected up to 360 min after the
`‘administration. Midazolam was absorbed rapidly reaching maximum serum concentrations of54:3% 5.0 ng/mi at
`
`e2 min. The elimination half-life of midazolam was 2.2+0.3 bh and the absolute availability was?737%. All
`mean values +SEM. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. Al! rights reserved.
`
`Keywords: Solubility; Benzodiazepines; Cyclodextrin, Complexation; Ionization
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Most benzodiazepine drugs are derivatives of
`2,3-dihydro-1H-1,4-benzodiazepine with sedative,
`antianxiety, anticonvulsant and muscle relaxant
`
`* Corresponding author. Tel.: + 354-5254464; fax: + 354-
`5254071.
`E-mail address: thorstlo@hi.is (T. Loftsson).
`
`properties. In pharmaceutical formulations benzo-
`diazepines are mainly used as the solid base, and
`as such they are readily dissolved in lipophilic
`solvents or in polar organic solvents such as etha-
`nol. Formulation of the benzodiazepine bases in
`aqueous drug formulation has been hampered by
`their low aqueous solubility and frequently the
`:
`ifpharmaceuti-
`
`only .practical..zmeans--of» obtaitiin;
`“solutions
`is
`cally.....acceptable.... benzodiazepine™
`
`0378-5173/01/% - see front matter © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
`PIT: 80378-5173(00)00580-9
`
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1125 Page 0001
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1125 Page 0001
`
`
`

`

`
`
`30
`
`T. Loftsson et ai. /International Journal of Pharmaceutics 212 (2001) 29-40
`
`through-:the-use~ofcombinations. of cosolvents
`Bc
`1997; Alvarez Nuiifies and
`Yalkowsky, 1998)."Unfortunately, administration
`of-non-aqueous-drug.formulations may. result in
`pain,.-irritation..and.drug. precipitation upon ad-
`ministration (Yalkowsky and Rubino, 1985; Way
`and Brazeau, 1999). Replacing the cosolvent for-
`mulations with aqueous cyclodextrin containing
`drug formulations may circumvent these side ef-
`fects (Brewster et al., 1989; Brewster, 1991; Brew-
`ster
`and
`Loftsson,
`1999).
`Previously,
`benzodiazepines have been solubilized through cy-
`clodextrin complexation (Kraus et al.,
`1991;
`Lofisson et al., 1994). However, the complexation
`efficacy is frequently low and,
`thus,
`relatively
`large amounts of cyclodextrin are needed to solu-
`bilize small amounts of a given benzodiazepine
`drug. Increased complexation efficacy can be ob-
`tained by increasing either the intrinsic solubility
`of the drug (S,) or the apparent stability constant
`(K,) of the drug/cyclodextrin complex, or by in-
`creasing both simultaneously (Loftsson,
`1998;
`Loftsson etal., 1999). In aqueous solutions, some
`drugs can exist in more than one structural form,
`e.g. equilibrium isomers or ionization stages. Al-
`though the individual forms are in equilibrium
`with each other, and thus not totally independent
`_of each other, the overall aqueous solubility (or
`apparent S,) of a drug can be enhanced through
`formation of such multiple structural forms.
`Cyclic imines, such as 2,3-dihydro-1H-1,4-ben-
`zodiazepine, are known to undergo reversible and
`pH-dependent ring-opening through formation of
`aldehyde or ketone and a primary amine:
`
`
`
`COC
`
`CHO
`
`NH;*
`
`Under certain conditions open and closed
`forms are both present in aqueous solutions. Co-
`existence of such forms increases the apparent
`solubility of the benzodiazepine. Often, the ring-
`open form is an intermediate which is formed
`during benzodiazepine degradation in aqueousso-
`lutions but in some cases, e.g.
`in the case of
`alprazolam, midazolam and triazolam, this form
`
`.
`
`is chemically stable and can contribute to the
`overall aqueous solubility of the drug (Choet al.,
`1983; Kanto,
`1985; Kurono et al,
`1985;
`Kuwayama et al., 1986; Sbarbati Nudelman and
`de Waisbaum, 1995). For example, in the com-
`mercial aqueous intravenous(i.v.) solution of mi-
`dazolam (Dormicum®, Hoffmann-La Roche,
`Switzerland) the drug is 15-20% in the ring-open
`form and the pH is approximately 3.3 (Gerecke,
`1983). In addition, both forms, Le. the ring-open
`and the ring-closed midazolam, can exist in sev-
`eral different ionization forms. In the aqueousi.v.
`solution, the ring-open form of midazolam can be
`characterized as a midazolam prodrug since the
`ring is completely closed when the pH is elevated
`to 7.4. Previously we have shown that low com-
`plexation efficiency can hamper the usage of cy-
`clodextrins
`in
`certain
`pharmaceutical
`formulations and that both drug ionization and
`water-soluble polymers can enhance the complex-
`ation efficiency (Loftsson, 1998; Loftsson et al.,
`1999). Ionization of a drug molecule increases the
`apparent S, and addition of a water-soluble poly-
`mer to the complexation media increases K,.
`Several investigators have attempted to use the
`commercially available aqueous iv. solution for
`intranasal
`(i-n.) administration of midazolam
`(Bjérkman et al., 1997; Burstein et al., 1997). The
`midazolam concentration in this solution is only 5
`mg/ml. Thus,
`relatively large amounts of the
`acidic i.v, solution have to be sprayed into the
`nose in order to induce sedation and anxiolysis.
`Subsequently midazolam is only partly absorbed
`from the nasal cavity and partly from the gas-
`trointestinal tract after swallowing. The midazo-
`lam bioavailability after in. administration of the
`iv. solution is frequently about 50% (Burstein et
`al., 1997). To reduce spilling and swallowing of
`the iv. solution after in. administration, and to
`improve the bioavailability, the dosage has to be
`sprayed in small aliquots into the nasal cavity
`(Bjérkman et al., 1997). However, in. administra-
`tion of the acidic i.v. solution can cause severe
`irritation in the nasal cavity.
`The purpose of the present study was to investi-
`gate the effects of the reversible ring-opening of
`the diazepine ring and ionization on the cyclodex-
`trin complexation of benzodiazepines, as well as
`
`
`
`
`
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1125 Page 0002
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1125 Page 0002
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`T. Laftsson et al. / International Journal of Pharmaceutics 212 (2001) 29-40
`
`31
`
`formulation and testing of physiologically accept-
`able aqueous midazolam nasal spray solution,
`
`2. Materials and methods
`
`2.1. Materials
`
`Midazolam base was purchased from Sifa
`(Shannon, Ireland), and alprazolam and triazolam
`from Sigma (St Louis, MO). Sulfobutylether-B-cy-
`clodextrin sodium salt with molar substitution of
`6.2 (Captisol®, SBEBCD) was kindiy donated by
`CyDex (Kansas City, KS). Randomly methylated
`B-cyclodextrin with degree of substitution (DS) of
`1.8 (RMBCD) and 2-hydroxypropyl-B-cyclodex-
`trin with DS of 0.6 (HPBCD) were kindly donated
`by Wacker-Chemie (Burghausen, Germany). Hy-
`droxypropy! methylcellulose 4000 (HPMC) was
`purchased from Mecobenzon (Denmark). All
`other chemicals used were of pharmaceutical or
`special analytical grade.
`
`2.2. Solubility studies
`
`An excess amount of the drug to be tested was
`added to water or aqueous Teorell—Stenhagen
`buffer system (Bates and Paabo, 1989), or the
`aqueous nasal
`formulation, containing various
`amounts of the different cyclodextrins with or
`without a polymer. The suspension formed was
`heated in an autoclave in a sealed container to
`130°C for at least 30 min. After cooling to room
`temperature (22--23°C) a small amount of solid
`drug was added to the container to promote
`precipitation. Then the suspension was allowed to
`equilibrate for at least 3 days at room tempera-
`ture, protected from light. After equilibration was
`attained, an aliquot of the suspension wasfiltered
`through a 0.45-y~m membranefilter (cellulose ace-
`tate from Schleicher & Schuell, Germany}, diluted
`with the HPLC mobile phase and analyzed by
`HPLC. The pH values reported were determined
`at room temperature at the end of the equilibra-
`tion period.
`The effect of pH on the stability constant (K,)
`of the drug/cyclodextrin (1:1) complex was deter-
`mined as previously described (Loftsson and Pe-
`
`tersen, 1998), Briefly the drug solubility was
`determined in aqueous nasal formulation contain-
`ing from 0 to 14% (w/v) cyclodextrin. The compo-
`sition of the nasal formulation was as follows:
`benzalkonium chloride
`(0.02% w/v), EDTA
`(sodium edetate) (0.1% w/v}, HPMC (0.1% w/v},
`phosphoric acid (0.43% v/v) and aqueous sodium
`hydroxide solution (for pH adjustment) in water.
`As before,
`the exact pH of each solution was
`determined at the end of the equilibration period.
`Differences in pH were corrected by drawing the
`pH-solubility profiles at each cyclodextrin concen-
`tration and determining the solubilities of the
`drug from these profiles at selected pH values.
`The values obtained were used to draw the phase-
`solubility diagrams, all of which were linear, Fi-
`nally, K, was calculated from the equation
`(Higuchi and Connors, 1965):
`_
`Slope
`° S,(1 — Slope)
`where K, is the stability constant of the drug—cy-
`clodextrin (1:1) complex, slope is the calculated
`slope of the linear phase-solubility diagram and
`5, is the apparent intrinsic solubility of the free
`drug determined in the aqueous complexation me-
`dia, at appropriate pH, when no cyclodextrin or
`polymer was present.
`
`2.3, Quantitative determinations
`
`The quantitative determination of drugs was
`carried out on a high performance liquid chro-
`matographic (HPLC) component systern consist-
`ing of ConstaMetric
`3200
`isocratic
`solvent
`delivery system operated at 1.50 ml/min, a Merck-
`Hitachi AS4000 autosampler, a Luna Cj, 5 pm
`(4.6 x 150 mm) column, a Spectro Monitor 3200
`UV/VIS_ variable-wavelength detector
`and a
`Merck-Hitachi D-2500 Chromato-Integrator. The
`mobile phase for alprazolam and triazolam con-
`sisted of methanol and water (68:32). The pH of
`the mobile phase was adjusted to 2.7 by addition
`of trifluoroacetic acid. The flow rate was 1.0
`ml/min and the detector was operated at 254 nm.
`For alprazolam, the retention was 2.8 min for the
`ring-open form and 4.7 min for the ring-closed
`form. For triazolam the retention was 2.3 min for
`
`
`
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1125 Page 0003
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1125 Page 0003
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`32
`
`T. Loftsson et al, {International Journal of Pharmaceutics 212 (2001) 29-40
`
`the ring-open form and 3.9 min forthe ring-closed
`form. The mobile phase for midazolam consisted
`of pH 7.2 aqueous 0.004 M phosphate buffer,
`acetonitrile and triethylamine (55:45:0.1). The
`flow rate was 1.5 ml/min and the detector was
`operated at 240 nm. The retention time was 2.6
`min for the ring-open form and 4.2 min for the
`ring-closed form.
`Whenthefraction of ring-open form was deter-
`mined the concentration of the closed form was
`determined right after dissolving the benzodi-
`azepine in the aqueous buffer solution, containing
`either no cyclodextrin or 10% (w/v) cyclodextrin,
`and again 24 h later (ie. after equilibration at
`23°C). Preliminary experiments had shown that
`equilibrium between the closed and the open form
`was attained within 3 h at 23°C and that no
`degradation of cither the ring-open or the ring-
`closed form occurred during the 24-h experiment.
`
`2.4, Kinetic studies in aqueous buffer solutions
`
`A stock solution (1.0 x 10-7 M)of the drug to
`be tested was prepared in a 0.1 M aqueous hydro-
`chloric acid solution (pH 1). This solution was
`equilibrated in a 37°C water bath for 3 h. This
`was to ensure that only the ring-open form was
`present in the stock solution. Cyclodextrin, etha-
`noi or dimethy! sulfoxide (DMSO) was dissolved
`in, or mixed with, pH 7.5 aqueous 0.5 M tris(hy-
`droxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris) buffer solution
`and the solution equilibrated at 37°C. At time
`zero, 30 ul of the stock solution was added to 1.5
`ml of the buffer solution, mixed for a couple of
`seconds on a vortex mixer, and placed again in
`the 37°C water bath. At various time points sam-
`ples were withdrawn from the reaction media and
`injected into a HPLC system (see Section 2,3),
`Both the ring-open and the ring-closed forms
`could be detected by HPLC and the disappear-
`ance of the ring-open form was proportional to
`the appearance of the ring-closed form. Thefirst-
`order rate constants (k,,,) for the disappearance
`of the ring-open form was calculated by linear
`regression of the natural logarithm of the peak
`height versus time plots.
`
`2,5, Kinetic studies in human serum
`
`The rate constant for the ring-closing reaction
`was determined in serum. The previously de-
`scribed (Section 2.4) stock solution of the drug
`(15 pl) was added to 1485 pl of serum which had
`previously been equilibrated at 37°C. After thor-
`ough mixing on a vortex mixer for a couple of
`seconds the solution was placed in a 37°C water
`bath. Sample (100 ul) was withdrawn from the
`solution at various time points and mixed with
`900 pl of ice cold methanol and the solution
`sonicated for 1 min. Then the solution was cen-
`trifuged and the clear supernatant analyzed by
`HPLC,
`
`2.6, Formulation of the aqueous nasal spray
`solution
`
`The phase solubility of midazolam was deter-
`mined in a medium which closely resembled the
`aqueous nasal spray vehicle,
`ie. 7-13% (w/y)
`SBEBCD, 0.10% (w/v) HPMC, 0.02% (w/v} ben-
`zalkonium chloride, 0.10% (w/v) EDTA and
`0.43% (v/v) concentrated phosphoric acid. Excess
`midazolam was added to this medium and the pH
`adjusted to 4.35 with concentrated aqueous
`sodium hydroxide solution, both before and after
`heating in an autoclave (121°C for 40 min). Then
`the samples were allowed to equilibrate for at
`least 4 days at room temperature and analyzed as
`before (Section 2.2). The exact composition of the
`nasal spray was based on this study. The viscosity
`of
`the nasal
`spray was determined with a
`Brookfield viscometer (UK) fitted with a ULA-
`DIN spindle and an UL sample holder with wa-
`ter-circulation jacket (25°C). The osmolarity of
`the nasal spray was measured by the freezing
`point depression method using a Knauer Os-
`raometer Automatic (Netherlands). The buffer ca-
`pacity of the nasal spray was estimated by the
`titration method using an aqueous 0.1 N sodium
`hydroxide solution. The preliminary evaluation of
`the chemical! stability of midazolam in the nasal
`formulation was performed by determining the
`midazolam concentration after successive heating
`cycles in an autoclave (Midmark M7 SpeedClave).
`Each heating cycle consisted of heating to 121°C,
`
`
`
`
`
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1125 Page 0004
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1125 Page 0004
`
`
`

`

`
`
`T. Lofisson et al. / International Journal of Pharmaceutics 212 (2001) 29-40
`
`33
`
`maintaining this temperature for 20 min, and
`cooling to room temperature. The midazolam
`concentration was determined after each heating
`cycle. The total number of heating cycles was
`six. Finally the midazolam nasal spray was
`stored at room temperature (22—23°C) and sam-
`ples collected at 0, 3, 4 and 12 months and
`analyzed,
`
`2.7. Evaluation in humans
`
`i.v. administration was compared in each partic-
`ipant and the maximum serum concentration
`(Cyrax) and time to reach C,,., (tmax} determined.
`In each participant the area under the serum—
`time curve from 0 to 6 h (AUC) was calculated
`after both in. and iv. administration using the
`linear
`trapezoidal method, and the absolute
`availability determined from the AUC,,/D,, over
`AUC,,/D,, ratio.
`
`The study was approved by both the ethics
`committee of the National University Hospital
`and the State Committee on Pharmaceuticals in
`Iceland. Six healthy volunteers (two females and
`four men} were
`recruited
`in
`a non-blind,
`crossover study. After obtaining informed con-
`sent and 8-h overnight fast, each participant re-
`ceived either
`intranasal
`(in.)
`ocr
`intravenous
`(i.v.) application of midazolam. The other appli-
`cation was carried out 7 days later. The partici-
`pants
`continued
`to
`fast
`until
`2
`h
`after
`administration of the study formulation. For i.n.
`administration, the participants received 0.06 mg
`of midazolam per kg body weight (D,,,), or 200—
`300 pi, of the aqueous nasal solution (Unit
`Dose closed spray system from Pfeiffer). For i.v.
`administration the participants received 2 mg of
`midazolam (D,,) in an i.v. solution (Dormicum®
`from Hoffmann—La Roche). Blood samples (5
`ml} were collected from an intravenous catheter
`~ at 3, 10, 15, 20, 30, 60, 120, 180, 240 and 360
`min. Samples were centrifuged and serum col-
`lected and kept
`frozen until analyzed by re-
`versed phase HPLC method (performed by
`Medicinsk Laboratorium A/S, Denmark). The
`serum concentration of midazolam after in. and
`
`eek Be) BN,
`
`rrAe \
`
`
`aN Ci
`Ff
`
`Neen
`
`Cl
`
`Alprazolam
`
`Midazolam
`
`Triazolam
`
`Fig. }. The chemical structures of the benzodiazepine bases
`studied.
`
`3. Theoretical background
`
`the benzodiazepine drugs studied, ie. al-
`All
`prazolam, midazolam and triazolam, contained
`2,3-dihydro-1H-1,4-benzodiazepine
`structure
`(Fig. 1}. Alprazolam and triazolam have a 1H-
`1,2,4-triazole ring fused on the 1,2-carbon—ni-
`trogen bond of the diazepine nucleus (ie. a
`triazolo
`[4,3-a][l,4]benzodiazepine
`structure),
`where as midazolam has a imidazole ring fused
`on the 1,2-carbon—nitrogen bond (i.e. an imi-
`dazo [1,5-a][1,4]benzodiazepine structure). Imida-
`zole is relatively basic (pK, 6.9) compared to
`1H-1,2,4-triazole. Thus, in midazolam the prote-
`nated nitrogen in position 2 on the imidazole
`ring (ic. N-2a) has a pK, of 6.15 whereas in
`alprazolam and triazolam the protonated N-2a
`on the triazole rmg has pX, <1.5 (Walser et al.,
`1978).
`In the diazepine nucleus the protonated
`nitrogen in position 4 (ic. N-4) has been esti-
`mated to be about 2.4 (Cho et al., 1983). In
`aqueous solutions the benzodiazepines undergo
`a reversible and pH-dependent ring-opening re-
`action (Fig. 2) (Han et al., 1976, 1977a,b; Cho
`et al., 1983). The pX, of the primary nitrogen
`formed has been estimated to be about 7.0 (Cho
`et al., 1983). There are some indications that the
`ring-opening should be pH-independent (Cho et
`al., 1983)
`in which case the ring-opening rate
`constant (k,) can be described by
`
`ky = Kyo fant
`
`(1)
`
`where Ayoo is the pH-independent rate constant
`and fim,
`is
`the fraction of benzodiazepine
`which is protonated in position N-4. However,
`Eq.
`(1)
`is kinetically equivalent
`to Eq.
`(2)
`
`
`
`
`
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1125 Page 0005
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1125 Page 0005
`
`

`

`
`
`34
`
`T. Loftsson et al. / International Journal of Pharmaceutics 212 (2001) 29-40
`
`
`
`X=Narc
`
`ork,
`
`Ho-&
`aa .
`WO
`pKaabout2.4
`ot 7
`
`HyG~MN
`N é
`
`
`
`Fig. 2. The ring-opening reaction of benzodiazepines.
`
`och
`
`\.,
`
`.about7
`emLe
`
`Tabie |
`The apparent equilibrium constant between the closed and open forms of the benzodiazepines:
`— {openro:
`[elosed}rotal
`“4
`where [open}yoa1 is the total concentration of benzodiazepine which is in the ring-open form and {closed},,,.q,
`concentration of benzodiazepine which is in the ring-closed form at 37°C
`
`is
`
`the total
`
`Cyclodextrin
`
`pH
`
`eq
`K,
`
`Alprazolam
`
`Midazolam
`
`Triazolam
`
`No cyclodextrin
`
`10% (w/v) HPBCD
`
`10% (w/v) SBEBCD
`
`.
`
`10% (w/v) RMBCD
`
`1
`2
`4
`I
`2
`4
`1
`2
`4
`1
`2
`4
`
`20
`6
`0.3
`100
`15
`0.3
`100
`25
`0.8
`100
`10
`0.1
`
`50
`3
`0.f
`100
`2
`<Q!
`100
`6
`0.1
`50
`0.8
`0.1
`
`.
`
`20
`2
`<0.1
`20
`2
`<0.1
`50
`3
`<6.1
`20
`0.8
`<0.1
`
`= kKLfHt],
`(2)
`4. Results and discussion
`
`fone =1-_At) @) 4.1. Solubilization
`
`HB+
`Je= [H*14+,+ K,
`The aqueous solubility of benzodiazepines is a
`function of both the ionization of the drug
`molecule and the ring-opening of the diazepine
`ring. The ring-opening of the benzodiazepine ring
`is pH-dependent and fully reversible (Fig. 2). The
`observed equilibrium constant (X,,) between the
`total concentration of the open and closed forms
`is pH-dependent, strongly favoring the closed
`form at pH above 4, but the open form at pH
`below 2 (Table 1). In general, the cyclodextrins
`
`where &,; is the specific acid catalysis rate constant
`for the ring-opening reaction, [H+] is the hydro-
`nium concentration and f, is the fraction of ben-
`zodiazepine which is not protonated in position
`N-4, Comparable equations can be obtained for
`the ring-closing rate constant (k _,). Under nor-
`mal conditions the ring-open forms of alprazo-
`lam, midazolam and triazolam are chemically
`stable in aqueous solutions.
`
`
`
`
`
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1125 Page 0006
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1125 Page 0006
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(mg/ml)
`
`30
`
`
`
`Solubility(mg/ml) a
`
`Triazolam Solubility
`
`f. Loftsson et al. / International Journal of Pharmaceutics 212 (2001) 29-40
`
`35
`
`appear to stabilize the ring-open forms (i.e. OH*
`and OH}3*) resulting in an increased K,, value at
`low pH. The data presented in Fig. 3 are based on
`solubility studies, quantitative determination of
`the total amounts of the ring-open and ring-
`closed benzodiazepine forms, and the observed
`pX, values of the different benzodiazepine forms
`im pure aqueous solution. From Fig. 3, it is possi-
`bie to estimate the contribution of each species
`(Le. different ionization forms of both the ring-
`open and ring-closed forms) to the overall benzo-
`diazepine solubility in aqueous solutions. For
`example,
`it
`is clear
`that
`the monoprotonized
`(BH*) and diprotonized (BH3*)
`ring-closed
`forms, as well as the monoprotonized ring-open
`forms (OH*), have an insignificant effect on the
`overall aqueous solubility of the three benzodi-
`azepines studied. Only when the diprotonized
`ring-open forms (OH2*) emerge do we observe a
`notable increase in aqueous solubility. Further-
`more, it is apparent that the uncharged cyclodex-
`trins (ie. RMBCD and HPBCD)
`interact
`less
`strongly with OH* and OH$+ than with the
`uncharged ring-closed form B, BH*+ or BH3*+
`(Fig.
`3). However,
`the
`negatively
`charged
`SBEBCDinteracts somewhat more strongly than
`the uncharged cyclodextrins with OH3* resulting
`in enhanced solubilization at low pH. The pK,
`values of midazolam are about 2.4 (N-4) and 6.15
`(N-2a) while those of alprazolam and triazolam
`are about 1.5 (N-2a) and 2.4 (N-4). Thus,
`the
`main reason for greater aqueous solubility of
`midazolam with decreasing pH, compared to the
`other two benzodiazepines studied,
`is the early
`appearance of the protonized forms, especially the
`diprotonized OH2* form.
`Cyclodextrins are able to form 1:1 complexes
`with the protonized forms and, thus, they are able
`to solubilize the positively charged ring-open and
`ring-closed forms (Figs. 3 and 4). However, the
`stability constants of these complexes are some-
`what lower than those of comparable uncharged
`species. It is possible to increase the complexation
`efficacy by adding a small amount of a water-sol-
`uble polymer to the aqueous complexation media
`and heating (Loftsson, 1998; Loftsson et al.,
`1999), For midazclam, SBEBCD was the best
`solubilizer of the three cyclodextrins tested and
`
`Solubility
`
`(mg/ml)
`
`Fig. 3. The effects of cyclodextrins, ionization and ring-open-
`ing on the aqueous solubility of benzodiazepines at room
`temperature (22—23°C). The cyclodextrin concentration was
`10% (w/v). f, mol fraction; B, benzodiazepine base (ring-closed
`form); BH*, monoprotonised benzodiazepine; BH3*, dipro-
`tonised benzodiazepine, OH*, monoprotonised ring-open
`form; OH2*, diprotonised ring-open form.
`
`
`
`
`
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1125 Page 0007
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1125 Page 0007
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`36
`
`. T. Lofisson et al. / International Journal of Pharmaceutics 212 (2001) 29-40
`
`thtal
`Solubility(mg/ml) —__oaun
`
`
`
`aowh
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`pH 5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`Fig. 4. The effects of pH and cyclodextrins on the solubility of
`midazolam in aqueous Teorell—Stenhagen buffer system. No
`cyclodextrin present (O); 16% (w/v} HPBCD (A); 10% (w/v)
`SBEBCD (5); 10% (w/v} SBEBCD and 0.10% (w/v) HPMC
`(m).
`
`addition of 0.10% (w/v) hydroxypropy! methylcel-
`lulose (HPMC) and heating in an autoclave at
`121°C for 20-40 min enhanced its solubilizing
`effect (Fig. 4). The value of the stability constant
`of the midazolam/SBEBCD (1:1) complex was
`determined to be 700 M7! at pH 4.8 but 425
`M~' at pH 4.0.
`
`4.2. Kinetic studies
`
`Equilibrium between the ring-open and ring-
`closed forms is reached within a few minutes upon
`dissolution of the benzodiazepine in aqueous me-
`dia. The equilibrium constants are pH-dependent
`favoring the ring-open forms at low pH and the
`ring-closed forms at physiological pH (Tabie 1). It
`is believed that only the ring-closed forms of the
`benzodiazepines
`are pharmacclogically active.
`Thus, it is important to determine how fast the
`ting closes under physiological conditions. The
`half-life of the first-order rate constant was deter-
`mined in aqueous 0.5 M Tris buffer solution at
`pH 7.5 and 37°C. For alprazolam the half-life in
`pure aqueous buffer solution was determined to
`be 5.3 min, 3.9 min for midazolam and 53 min for
`-triazolam, Addition of cyclodextrins
`to the
`aqueous reaction medium increased the half-life
`of the ring-closing reaction (Table 2). This effect
`of cyclodextrins on the half-life is in agreement
`with the observation that cyclodextrins stabilize
`the ring-open forms (i.e. OH* and OH2+). Or-
`
`ganic solvents such as ethanol and dimethylsul-
`foxide reduce the complexation by competing
`with the benzodiazepines for a space in the cy-
`clodextrin cavity and, thus, reducing the effects of
`cyclodextrins. However, when no cyclodextrin
`was present in the reaction medium both ethanol
`and dimethylsulfoxide increased the half-life for
`the ring-closure of alprazolam and midazolam. In
`the case of triazolam the effects were much less
`pronounced,
`In freshly collected human serum the half-life of
`the first-order rate constant for the ring-closing
`reaction was estimated to be less that 2 min for
`both alprazolam and midazolam (in vitro at
`37°C). For triazolam the half-life was somewhat
`higher but still very short. Thus,
`it can be as-
`sumed that
`ring-open forms of the benzodi-
`azepines close very rapidly upon absorption into
`the systemic circulation.
`In the nasal cavity lipophilic molecules will
`compete with the drug molecules for a space in
`the cyclodextrin cavity in much the same way as
`ethanol and DMSO molecules do in our in vitro
`study, Thus, administration of the ring-open form
`of the benzodiazepines in a cyclodextrin-contain-
`ing nasal spray solution should not have any
`effect on their pharmacological effect. That
`is
`beside enhancing aqueous solubility and delivery
`of the drug molecule through the biological mem-
`brane. However, excess cyclodextrin can decrease
`the drug bioavailability in the nasal spray solution
`(Masson et al., 1999). It is therefore important to
`use just enough cyclodextrin to solubilize the drug
`in the aqueous nasal spray solution.
`
`4.3. Formulation of a midazolam nasal spray
`
`The phase solubility of midazolam in the
`aqueous nasal spray vehicle shows that 12.33%
`(w/v) SBEBCD is required to dissolvé=l7-mgvof
`midazolamin:1aml-of:thevehicle (Fig. 5). To
`ensure that no precipitation will be formed during
`storage, a small excess of SBEBCD is needed.
`Thus, the final formulation contained 14% (w/v)
`SBEBCD. The composition of the aqueous nasal
`formulation was as follows: midazolam (1.7% w/
`v), SBEBCD (14% w/v), HPMC (0.1% w/v}, ben-
`zalkonium chloride (0.02% w/v), EDTA (0.1%
`B\e
`7}
`
`aett
`4
`at
`
`
`
`
`
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1125 Page 0008
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1125 Page 0008
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`T. Loftsson et al. / International Journal of Pharmaceutics 212 (2001) 29-46
`
`37
`
`Table 2
`
`The effects of cyclodextrins and organic cosolvents on the half-life for the rate of ring-closure in aqueous 0.5 M Tris buffer solution
`at pH 7.5 and 37.0°C
`
`Cyclodextrin 10% (w/V)
`
`Organic cosolvent® % (v/v)
`
`Half-life ratio”
`
`
`
` Alprazolam® Midazolam* Triazolam®
`
`
`
`No cyclodextrin
`
`HPBCD
`
`1.0
`1.0
`1.0
`No cosolvent
`10
`1.4
`[.]
`10% EtOH
`0.7
`2.1
`1.8
`50% EtOH
`1.6
`1,3
`13
`10% DSMO
`1.0
`1.6
`1,2
`50% DMSO
`2.0
`6.5
`4.2
`No cosolvent
`14
`4.6
`2,3
`10% EtOH
`13
`27
`1.8
`50% EtOH
`1.7
`5.3
`2.9
`10% DSMO
`1.2
`21
`15
`50% DMSO
`2,3
`13.7
`4.2
`No cosolvent
`1.6
`5.4
`2.5
`10% EtOH
`14
`2.8
`2.2
`50% EtOH
`1.8
`8.0
`2.7
`10% DSMO
`1.2
`2.1
`1.4
`50% DMSO
`2.1
`6.0
`5.2
`No cosolvent
`14
`4.2
`2,6
`10% EtOH
`1.3
`2.6
`1.9
`50% EtOH
`1.7
`3.6
`3.3
`10% DSMO
`
`
`
`1.6 2.150% DMSO 12
`
`SBEBCD
`
`RMBCD
`
`* EtOH, absolute ethanol, DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide.
`>The half-life divided by the half-life in pure aqueous buffer solution (i.e. buffer solution containing neither cosolvent nor
`cyclodextrin).
`* The half-life for formation of alprazolam, midazolam and triazolam in aqueous pH 7.5 buffer solution at 37.0°C was determined
`to be 5.3, 3.9 and 53 min,respectively.
`
`The aqueous nasal spray solution was heated in
`sealed containers for up to six successive heating
`cycles. Each heating cycle consisting of heating to
`121°C for 20 min and cooling to room tempera-
`ture. The midazolam concentration in the solution
`
`w/v), concentrated phosphoric acid (0.43% v/v)
`and water (to 100% v/v}. A concentrated aqueous
`sodium hydroxide solution was used to adjust the
`pH to 4.3. The nasal spray was prepared as
`follows. The solid components were weighed into
`a 100-m! volumetric flask. Phosphoric acid and
`most of the water was added and the solution
`stirred until all solid material had dissolved. Then
`the pH was adjusted to 4.35 with a concentrated
`sodium hydroxide solution understirring. Water
`was added to the mark and the aqueoussolution
`heated in a sealed contained in an autoclave
`(121°C for 40 min). After cooling,
`the solution
`was filtered through a sterile 0.45-ym membrane
`filter
`into amber
`glass vials under
`aseptic
`conditions.
`The stability of midazolam in the nasal spray
`upon heating in an autoclave was investigated.
`
`_——
`
`
`
`a8Solubility(mg/ml)
`
`nw&
`
`o
`
`10
`5
`SBE CD conc. (% wi)
`
`15
`
`Fig. 5. The phase solubility of midazolam in the nasal spray
`vehicle at room temperature (22-23°C).
`
`
`
`
`
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1125 Page 0009
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1125 Page 0009
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`3oo
`
`T. Loftsson et al. {International Journal of Pharmaceutics 212 (2001) 29-40
`
`te
`
`P=
`
`2=Nw&HA Volumeof0.1MNaOH(ml)
`_=
`
`Serumconcentration(ng/ini}B888
`
`Fig. 6. Titration curve of the midazolam nasal spray. The line
`represents linear fit of data between pH 3.5 and 5.0.
`
`6
`
`ture. Thus, the ring-open form of midazolam has
`adequate chemical stability in the aqueous nasal
`spray solution. The aqueous nasal spray solution
`showed Newtonian flow characteristics and its
`viscosity was determined to be 2.80 + 0.02 mPas.
`The osmolarity of this solution was determined to
`be 541 + 14 mOsm/kg. The buffer capacity of the
`aqueous nasal spray solution was determined
`from linear fit of the titration curve (Fig. 6)
`between pH 3.5 and 5.0. The buffer capacity was
`determined to be 0.016 M. These results show that
`the nasal spray solution is a low viscosity, some-
`what hypertonic solution with adequate buffer
`capacity to maintain constant pH during storage.
`
`4.4. Evaluation in humans
`
`two women and four
`Six healthy volunteers,
`men, were enrolled in this investigation. The mean
`(+58.D.) age and weightof the participants were
`26.0 (45.7) years and 74.5 (+ 10.8) kg, respec-
`tively. The participants only reported mild to
`moderate irritation within the nasal passage and/
`or throat area following administration of 200—
`300 pl (based on body weight) of the nasal spray
`solution. Plots of midazolam serum concentra-
`tion—time curves for in. and iv. administration
`are shown in Fig, 7 and the main pharmacokinetic
`
`Table 3
`Mean (7 = 6) pharmacokinetic parameters and SEM of mida-
`zolam in healthy volunteers following in. administration of a
`0.06 mg/kg dose or iv. administration of a 2 mg fixed dose*
`
`Pharmacokinetic
`parameter
`
`Intranasal
`
`Intravenous
`
`Mean
`
`SEM Mean
`
`SEM
`
`Crnax (ng/ml)
`tnax (hh)
`
`54.3
`0.25
`
`5.0
`0.04
`
`-
`~
`
`-
`-
`
`4 (bh)
`k, (h7')
`AUC/D, 10° (min

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket