throbber
Lorazepam in the Treatment
`of Refractory Neonatal Seizures
`A Pilot Study
`Anita Deshmukh, MD; William Wittert, MD; Eugene Schnitzler, MD; Henry H. Mangurten, MD
`
`\s=b\Seven neonatal patients with severe
`seizures unresponsive to conventional
`therapy were treated
`anticonvulsant
`with lorazepam. Immediate cessation of
`seizure activity occurred in all patients
`within five minutes. Although seizures
`recurred in two infants eight hours later,
`severity diminished.
`frequency and
`There were no apparent significant side
`effects attributed to the medication.
`(AJDC 1986;140:1042-1044)
`"Defractory seizures are often a diffi¬
`cult management problem in the
`neonatal patient. Seizure activity
`requires appropriate treatment
`to
`minimize mortality and to reduce
`neurologic sequelae.1 The successful
`management of refractory neonatal
`seizures depends on the use of drugs
`with rapid onset of action, long dura¬
`tion, and minimal side effects. There¬
`fore, phénobarbital sodium and pheny¬
`toin sodium are usually the drugs of
`first choice.1 Diazepam, a benzodi-
`azepine, has also been used in neonatal
`patients for many years for the treat¬
`ment of seizures. Its use, however, is
`limited by its short duration of action
`and occasional reports of cardiovascu¬
`lar and/or respiratory complications.2
`Recent literature suggests that loraze¬
`pam, a new longer-acting benzodiaze-
`pine, is both effective and safe in the
`management of status epilepticus in
`adults and older children.35 To our
`knowledge, comparative data docu¬
`menting the safety and efficacy in neo¬
`nates are unavailable to date. We con-
`Accepted for publication June 16, 1986.
`From the Division of Pediatrics (Dr Wittert),
`Sections of Pediatric Neurology (Dr Schnitzler)
`and Neonatology (Drs Deshmukh and Mangur-
`ten), Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Ill.
`Reprint requests to Neonatology Office, Lu-
`theran General Hospital, 1775 W Dempster St,
`Park Ridge, IL 60068 (Dr Mangurten).
`
`ducted a pilot study of seven critically
`ill infants with refractory seizures to
`investigate the safety and potential
`efficacy of lorazepam. The study was
`approved by the Institutional Review
`Board of the hospital.
`METHODS
`
`Seven infants with severe refractory sei¬
`zures were studied (Table). The group con¬
`sisted of two male and five female infants,
`varying in gestational age from 30 to 43
`weeks. Birth weights ranged from 1540 to
`4224 g. Five infants were full-term and two
`were preterm.
`The seizures in all of these infants were a
`result of severe perinatal asphyxia and
`hypoxic-isehemic encephalopathy; one in¬
`fant also incurred an intraventricular hem¬
`orrhage.
`Infants with seizures secondary
`to hypoglycemia or electrolyte distur¬
`bances were excluded, as were infants with
`congenital malformations of the brain. In¬
`fants were selected for the study only if
`they experienced severe asphyxia neo-
`natorum. None of these infants had a five-
`minute Apgar score exceeding 5 (Table).
`All infants were evaluated and treated for
`presumptive sepsis; all cultures of blood
`and cerebrospinal fluid were subsequently
`negative for bacterial growth. The age of
`onset of seizures ranged from less than 1 to
`72 hours. All patients had clinically docu¬
`mented seizures of the multifocal clonic and
`subtle types.
`Initial treatment consisted of appropri¬
`ate intravenous loading doses of phéno¬
`barbital and phenytoin sodium, each at
`15 mg/kg per dose, within the range (15 to
`20 mg/kg) previously recommended.6 Some
`subsequently
`authorities
`have
`recom¬
`mended a loading dose of 20 mg/kg for
`each.2 Therapeutic levels of phénobarbital
`(20 to 30 mg/L) were documented in all
`seven infants. Therapeutic levels of pheny¬
`toin sodium (10 to 20 mg/L) were docu¬
`mented in five of the seven infants. In the
`
`other two infants,
`the phenytoin levels
`were subtherapeutic when lorazepam was
`administered. Infants were enrolled in the
`study if seizures persisted after loading
`doses of these drugs.
`After obtaining informed consent from
`the parent(s), infants received lorazepam in
`a dose of 0.05 mg/kg per dose given in¬
`travenously over two to five minutes. This
`dose was based on an extrapolation of the
`In three of
`standard adult dose of 4 mg.
`electroencephalogram
`infants,
`seven
`(EEG) monitoring was done before, dur¬
`ing, and after lorazepam injection.
`In all
`infants, EEG monitoring was done within
`24 hours after lorazepam administration.
`Lorazepam was considered to be effective
`on the basis of
`immediate cessation of
`clinical seizure activity and suppression of
`seizure activity in EEG, when available.
`The clinical and laboratory data that
`were collected and monitored included the
`following:
`(1) vital signs,
`including blood
`pressure, up to 24 hours after lorazepam
`administration; (2) serial observations and
`descriptions of seizure activity; (3) baseline
`laboratory data, including a complete blood
`cell count, platelets, and 20-factor auto¬
`mated blood chemistry analysis profile, and
`phénobarbital and phenytoin levels. These
`data were obtained serially for 72 hours
`following lorazepam administration. Blood
`gases were monitored as dictated by the
`clinical condition. No infant received a sec¬
`ond dose of lorazepam. Maintenance doses
`of phénobarbital and phenytoin, however,
`were begun 12 hours after loading doses of
`these drugs.
`Either computed tomography of
`the
`brain or cranial ultrasound was performed
`in six infants. The ultrasound of patient 3
`revealed grade II intraventricular hemor¬
`rhage. Results of imaging studies in the
`remainder of the infants were normal.
`RESULTS
`Following the administration of
`lorazepam,
`temperature, blood près-
`
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1036 page 0001
`
`Downloaded From: by Matthew Solow on 01/04/2018
`
`

`

`Clinical Data
`
`Birth
`Weight,
`g
`3580
`
`Gesta¬
`tional
`Age, wk
`42
`
`Patient
`1
`
`Apgar
`Scores
`at 1, 5, and
`10 min
`2, 5t
`
`Etiology
`of
`Seizures*
`HIE
`
`Age at
`Onset of
`Seizures, h
`4V2
`
`2, 4, 5
`
`HIE
`
`<1
`
`2640
`
`1540
`
`39
`
`30
`
`4120
`
`42-43
`
`2807
`
`36-37
`
`0, 2, 4
`
`0,0,0
`0,3*
`
`0, 3
`
`2,4,7
`
`2830
`
`38-39
`
`2,4,4
`
`4224
`
`40 +
`
`0,2,5
`
`Response
`No recurrence of seizures
`for 24 h after lorazepam
`except occasional
`lipsmacklng at 12 h
`No recurrence of seizures
`for 24 h after
`lorazepam except
`llpsmacking
`occasional
`No seizures for 24 h after
`lorazepam
`
`Bicycling movements
`recurred 8 h after
`lorazepam
`
`Bicycling movements
`recurred 8 h after
`lorazepam
`No recurrence of seizure
`activity for 24 h after
`lorazepam
`
`Recurrence of multifocal
`clonic seizures 12 h
`after lorazepam
`
`Short-term Outcome
`Discharged from hospital on 13th d
`of life on regimen of
`phénobarbital; neurologic
`examination results abnormal
`Discharged from hospital on
`regimen of phénobarbital on
`46th d of life; neurologic
`examination results abnormal
`Discharged from hospital on
`regimen of phénobarbital on
`78th d; neurologic examination
`results abnormal
`Life support discontinued 4 d after
`lorazepam administration; died
`within 5 min; postmortem
`examination revealed
`encephalomalacia
`Died at 19 d of age following acute
`renal failure and multiple organ
`infarcts
`Discharged from hospital on 16th d
`of life on regimen of
`phénobarbital; neurologic
`examination results abnormal
`Discharged from hospital on 70th d
`on regimen of phénobarbital;
`neurologic examination results
`abnormal; prolonged stay
`necessitated by plastic surgery
`for extensive slough of buttocks
`
`HIE
`IVH
`
`IVH
`HIE
`
`HIE
`
`HIE
`
`HIE
`
`72
`
`*HIE Indicates hypoxlc-ischemlc encephalopathy; IVH, Intraventricular hemorrhage.
`fTen-minute Apgar score not available.
`^Fifteen at 20 minutes.
`
`sure, and pulse remained stable in all
`infants. In the three patients who re¬
`quired assisted ventilation before
`lorazepam administration, no deterio¬
`ration of their respiratory status was
`observed, ie, they did not require in¬
`In the
`creased respiratory support.
`remaining four infants who were not
`receiving mechanical ventilatory as¬
`sistance, no respiratory or cardiovas¬
`cular compromise was noted.
`In five patients, a complete blood
`cell count and platelet count remained
`stable. Two infants required blood
`transfusions for conditions believed to
`be unrelated to lorazepam administra¬
`tion. One infant required a blood trans¬
`fusion to replace blood drawn for fre¬
`quent analysis of blood gases and other
`laboratory determinations. A second
`infant required a blood transfusion be¬
`cause of bleeding secondary to dis¬
`seminated intravascular coagulation.
`No changes or deterioration was noted
`in the values of serum electrolytes,
`calcium, glucose, or protein or liver
`
`and renal functions during the 72-hour
`monitoring.
`In two infants who re¬
`quired umbilical artery catheteriza¬
`tion, serial blood gas monitoring after
`lorazepam administration revealed no
`deterioration in acid-base balance or
`oxygénation.
`The onset of action of lorazepam was
`rapid, with immediate cessation of sei¬
`zure activity in five minutes.
`In one
`infant, bicycling movements recurred
`eight hours after lorazepam adminis¬
`tration, but the severity diminished.
`In another infant, recurrence of subtle
`seizures with buccolingual activity re¬
`curred eight hours after lorazepam
`administration, but the frequency and
`duration decreased.
`Electroencephalographic monitor¬
`ing before lorazepam administration in
`patients 3, 5, and 6 demonstrated
`burst suppression patterns and elec¬
`trographic seizures in the form of
`rhythmic theta and delta activity or
`multifocal sharp waves. Within min¬
`utes of the administration of lorazepam
`
`in patient 3, there was a marked gener¬
`alized suppression of the background
`activity with cessation of electro¬
`graphic seizures. A follow-up tracing
`three hours later in this patient contin¬
`ued to demonstrate marked back¬
`ground suppression.
`In patient 1, an EEG was obtained
`before receiving lorazepam and a fol¬
`low-up tracing was performed 24 hours
`later. The initial EEG showed burst
`suppression and ictal patterns in the
`form of multifocal high-voltage spikes
`and rhythmic delta activity. The next
`day the EEG was improved, with mul¬
`tifocal epileptogenic activity but no
`electrographic seizures. Two weeks
`later, this patient's tracing was normal
`for conceptual age.
`Due to urgent clinical considera¬
`tions, EEG monitoring could not be
`obtained during lorazepam adminis¬
`tration in the other three patients.
`Tracings obtained within 24 hours
`were all abnormal due to background
`disorganization,
`suppression,
`and
`
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1036 page 0002
`
`Downloaded From: by Matthew Solow on 01/04/2018
`
`

`

`focal or multifocal epileptogenic activ¬
`ity.
`In patient 4,
`the record was se¬
`verely suppressed and the question of
`electrocerebral silence was raised.
`This patient's tracing reverted to a
`burst-suppression
`pattern
`severe
`three days later.
`COMMENT
`Adult human data indicate that
`lorazepam has a half-life of 13 to 15
`hours, rapidly penetrates the central
`nervous system, and produces minimal
`cardiovascular and respiratory de¬
`pression in normal subjects.7,8 Our pre¬
`liminary data indicate that lorazepam
`appears to be a safe and effective ad¬
`junct
`to traditional anticonvulsant
`medications in the management of re¬
`fractory neonatal seizures. No car¬
`diorespiratory embarrassment was
`noted in any neonate receiving loraze¬
`pam. Furthermore, there were no in¬
`stances of anemia, neutropenia, or
`thrombocytopenia that could be at¬
`tributed to lorazepam administration.
`In all patients, serum electrolyte, cal¬
`cium, glucose, albumin, globulin, cho¬
`lesterol, and triglycéride levels, and
`hepatic and renal functions remained
`improved following
`unchanged or
`lorazepam administration.
`(Improve¬
`ments in biochemical values correlated
`with recovery from asphyxia.) In two
`instances following lorazepam admin¬
`istration,
`the serum phénobarbital
`increased into the toxic range.
`level
`Both of these levels returned to normal
`within 72 hours after withholding phé¬
`nobarbital therapy. Such fluctuations
`are common in severely ill neonates
`with variable hepatic function. Addi¬
`tional controlled studies may clarify a
`possible relationship between elevated
`
`phénobarbital levels and lorazepam.
`One milliliter of the lorazepam prep¬
`aration used
`contains
`2 mg of
`lorazepam,
`the drug
`0.18 mL of
`solubilizer, polyethylene glycol 400 in
`glycol,
`propylene
`and
`the
`pre¬
`servative, 2.0% benzyl alcohol. The
`former has caused hyperosmolality in
`infants receiving 10 mL of a multi¬
`vitamin preparation containing 30%
`propylene glycol.9 The largest dose of
`lorazepam used in this study, 0.20 mg,
`required 0.1 mL of the solution, con¬
`taining 0.018 mL of the solubilizer,
`approximately 1/500 the volume in the
`above-mentioned report. Benzyl alco¬
`hol has caused a fatal toxic syndrome
`in preterm infants who received ap¬
`proximately 100 to 400 mg/kg/d of the
`substance.1011 Since the largest total
`dose received by any infant
`in this
`study was 2 mg, the occurrence of this
`syndrome was considered unlikely.
`Another concern relates to the po¬
`tential for benzyl alcohol to displace
`bilirubin from albumin binding sites.
`Theoretically this could result in ker-
`nicterus at low serum bilirubin levels
`in asphyxiated and low-birth-weight
`infants who already have decreased
`bilirubin-binding capacity. Other than
`in vitro data, there is no documenta¬
`tion that benzoate enhances this risk in
`the human newborn.12 Furthermore,
`the dose of benzyl alcohol was so small
`in our study (0.5 mg/kg) that the effect
`of bilirubin displacement was consid¬
`ered insignificant.
`In all of our infants, lorazepam ad¬
`ministration was followed rapidly by
`cessation of clinical seizure activity.
`Compared with diazepam, a primary
`advantage of the drug appears to be
`the duration of seizure control follow-
`
`References
`
`ing administration.5 Lorazepam pre¬
`vented recurrence of seizure activity
`up to 24 hours after administration.
`The longer duration of seizure control
`obtained with lorazepam may be due to
`its slower tissue distribution.13
`Electroencephalographic data con¬
`firmed the cessation of seizure activity
`accompanied by a generalized sup¬
`pression of background activity. Such
`background suppression has also been
`observed after the administration of
`diazepam in neonates." The duration
`of background suppression, however,
`may be longer after lorazepam admin¬
`istration. Caution must therefore be
`exercised in cases of suspected elec-
`trocerebral silence if the patient has
`recently received lorazepam.
`CONCLUSION
`In summary, based on preliminary
`data in seven patients, lorazepam ap¬
`pears to be a safe and probably effec¬
`tive agent for the treatment of refrac¬
`Its efficacy
`tory neonatal seizures.
`appears at least comparable with that
`of diazepam. Other advantages may
`include prolonged duration of action
`and absence of cardiorespiratory de¬
`pression. We cannot recommend the
`routine use of lorazepam in the treat¬
`ment of neonatal seizures.
`Its use,
`however, may be justifiable in severely
`ill neonates with seizures refractory to
`therapy. A controlled
`conventional
`study is needed, perhaps comparing
`diazepam with lorazepam in randomly
`assigned cases and including blood
`level determinations and pharmaco-
`kinetics.
`
`Kim Walkup gave technical assistance, and
`Seymour Metrick, MD, and Alice Kowalczyk,
`PharmD, made helpful suggestions.
`
`1. Fenichel GM: Neonatal Neurology. New
`York, Churchill Livingstone Inc, 1980, chap 2.
`2. Volpe JJ: Neurology of the Newborn. Phila-
`delphia, WB Saunders Co, 1981, chap 5.
`3. Leppik IE, Derivan AT, Homan RW, et al:
`Double-blind study of lorazepam and diazepam in
`status epilepticus. JAMA 1983;249:1452-1454.
`4. Levy RJ, Krall RL: Treatment of status
`epilepticus with lorazepam. Arch Neurol 1984;41:
`605-611.
`5. Howman RW, Walker JE: Clinical studies of
`lorazepam in status epilepticus. Adv Neurol
`1983;34:493-498.
`6. Painter MJ, Pippenger C, MacDonald H,
`et al: Phenobarbital and diphenylhydantoin lev-
`els in neonates with seizures. J Pediatr 1978;92:
`
`315-319.
`7. Greenblatt DJ, Comer WH, Elliott HW,
`et al: Clinical pharmacokinetics of lorazepam:
`III. Intravenous injection: Preliminary results.
`J Clin Pharmacol 1977;17:490-494.
`8. Greenblatt DJ, Shader RI, Franke K, et al:
`Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of
`intra-
`lorazepam in
`intramuscular, and oral
`venous,
`humans. J Pharm Sci 1979;68:57-63.
`9. Glasgow AM, Boeckx RL, Miller MK, et al:
`Hyperosmolality in small
`infants due to pro-
`pylene glycol. Pediatrics 1983;72:353-355.
`10. Brown WJ, Buist NRM, Gipson HTC, et al:
`Fatal benzyl alcohol poisoning in a neonatal inten-
`sive care unit. Lancet 1982;1:1250.
`11. Gershanik JJ, Boecler B, George W, et al:
`
`The gasping syndrome: Benzyl alcohol (BA) poi-
`soning? abstracted. Clin Res 1981;29:895A.
`12. Brodersen R: Free bilirubin in blood
`plasma of the newborn: Effects of albumin, fatty
`acids, pH, displacing drugs, and phototherapy, in
`Stern L, Oh W, Friis-Hansen B (eds): Intensive
`Care of the Newborn: II. New York, Masson
`Publishers USA Inc, 1978, pp 331-345.
`13. Greenblatt DJ, Shader RI: Drug therapy:
`Prazepam and lorazepam, two new benzodiaze-
`pines. N Engl J Med 1978;299:1342-1344.
`14. Werner SS, Stockard JE, Bickferd RG:
`Atlas ofNeonatal Electroencephalography. New
`York, Raven Press, 1977, p 19.
`
`AQUESTIVE EXHIBIT 1036 page 0003
`
`Downloaded From: by Matthew Solow on 01/04/2018
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket