throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`___________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`APOTEX, INC.
`Petitioner,
`v.
`UCB BIOPHARMA SPRL
`Patent Owner.
`U.S. Patent No. 8,633,194 to Fanara et al.
`Issue Date: January 21, 2014
`Title: Pharmaceutical composition of piperazine derivatives
`Inter Partes Review No.: IPR2019-00400
`
`Petitioner’s Exhibit List
`
`

`

`Petitioner
`Exhibit #
`1001
`1002
`1003
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`1012
`
`1013
`1014
`1015
`1016
`1017
`
`Petitioner’s Exhibit List
`
`Description
`U.S. Patent No. 8,633,194 (“the ’194 patent”)
`Declaration of Dr. Laskar
`CV of Dr. Laskar
`European Patent Application Publication No. 0605203 A2 (“EP
`’203”)
`levocetirizine, and
`Wang D.Y., “Effect of cetirizine,
`dextrocetirizine on histamine-induced nasal response in healthy
`adult volunteers,” Allergy 56 (2001), pp. 339-343 (“Wang”)
`Kibbe, “Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients,” 3rd ed. 2000
`(the “Handbook”)
`International Patent Application No. WO 2004/050094 (“WO
`’094”)
`Tillement, Jean-Paul et al., “Compared pharmacological
`characteristics in humans of racemic cetirizine and levocetirizine,
`two
`histamine H1-receptor
`antagonists,” Biochemical
`Pharmacology Volume 66,
`Issue 7, 1 October 2003,
`pages 1123-1126
`Potter, P.C., “Levocetirizine is effective for symptom relief
`including nasal congestion in adolescent and adult (PAR)
`sensitized to house dust mites,” Allergy (Oxford, United
`Kingdom) Volume 58, Issue 9, pages 893-899, Journal 2003
`Gandon, J.M. et al., “Lack of effect of single and repeated doses
`of Levocetirizine, a new antihistamine drug, on cognitive and
`psychomotor functions in healthy volunteers,” British Journal of
`Clinical Pharmacology (2002), 54(1), 51-58
`Orange Book Entry for XYZAL
`R.J. Davies et al., Antihistamines: topical vs. oral administration,
`Clinical and Experimental Allergy 26(3):11-17 (1996) (“Davies”)
`File Wrapper of ’194 patent
`Gennaro, A. R., Remington: The Science and Practice of
`Pharmacy 20th ed. (2000)
`U.S. Patent No. 5,698,558 to Nancy M. Grey (“US ’558”)
`EPO opposition
`Saeedi et al., “The treatment of atopic dermatitis with licorice
`gel,” Journal of Dermatological Treatment (2003) 14, 1–5
`
`

`

`1018
`
`1019
`1020
`1021
`
`1022
`
`1023
`
`1024
`
`Duconge et al., “Topical disposition of two strengths of a
`125I-rhEGF jelly in rat skin wounds,” Biopharm. Drug Dispos.
`25: 193–201 (2004)
`U.S. Patent No. 4,275,076
`U.S. Patent No. 5,643,584
`Ansel et al., Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery
`Systems 7th ed. 1999
`Soni et al., “Evaluation of the health aspects of methyl paraben:
`a review of the published literature,” Food and Chemical
`Toxicology 40 (2002) 1335–1373
`Sutton et al., “Development of the Antimicrobial Effectiveness
`Test as USP Chapter <51>” PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical
`Science and Technology, Vol. 56, No. 6, 300-311,
`November/December 2002
`Darwish et al., Effect of ethanol, propylene glycol and glycerol on
`the interaction of methyl and propyl p-hydroxybenzoate with
`Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Int. J. of
`Pharm. 147:51-60 (1997).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket