throbber
TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY 153, 12–19 (1998)
`ARTICLE NO. TO988544
`
`Some Alkyl Hydroxy Benzoate Preservatives (Parabens) Are Estrogenic
`
`Edwin J. Routledge,*,1 Joanne Parker,* Jenny Odum,† John Ashby,† and John P. Sumpter*
`
`*Department of Biology & Biochemistry, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom, and †Zeneca Central Toxicology Laboratory,
`Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK10 4TJ, United Kingdom
`
`Received May 5, 1998; accepted August 6, 1998
`
`Some Alkyl Hydroxy Benzoate Preservatives (Parabens) Are
`Estrogenic. Routledge, E. J., Parker, J., Odum, J., Ashby, J., and
`Sumpter, J. P. (1998). Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 153, 12–19.
`
`The inadvertent estrogenicity of certain synthetic chemicals,
`and their subsequent effects on the endocrine system of humans
`and wildlife, is of concern. In this paper we report findings from in
`vitro and in vivo (uterotrophic) studies which confirm that a range
`of alkyl hydroxy benzoate preservatives (parabens) are weakly
`estrogenic. In a receptor-binding assay, butylparaben was able to
`compete with 3H-estradiol for binding to the rat estrogen receptor
`with an affinity approximately 5 orders of magnitude lower than
`that of diethylstilboestrol, and between 1 and 2 orders of magni-
`tude less than nonylphenol. In an in vitro yeast-based estrogen
`assay, the four most widely used parabens (namely methyl-, ethyl-,
`propyl-, and butylparaben) were all found to be weakly estrogenic
`with the most potent (butylparaben) being 10,000-fold less potent
`than 17␤-estradiol. The estrogenic activity of parabens was inhib-
`ited by 4-hydroxy tamoxifen in vitro, illustrating the requirement
`of these chemicals to interact with the estrogen receptor in order to
`activate the yeast. When administered orally to immature rats, the
`parabens were inactive. However, subcutaneous administration of
`butylparaben produced a positive uterotrophic response in vivo,
`although it was approximately 100,000 times less potent than
`17␤-estradiol. Given their use in a wide range of commercially
`available topical preparations, it is suggested that the safety in use
`of these chemicals should be reassessed, with particular attention
`being paid to estimation of the actual levels of systemic exposure
`of humans exposed to these chemicals. The acquisition of such
`data is a prerequisite to the derivation of reliable estimates of the
`possible human risk of exposure to parabens. © 1998 Academic Press
`
`It is now realized that certain synthetic compounds, used in
`a wide range of products, can mimic the effects of the main
`natural estrogen, 17␤-estradiol, by binding to the estrogen
`receptor and influencing the expression of estrogen-dependent
`genes. This realization has coincided with epidemiological
`data, suggesting a progressive decline in human male repro-
`ductive health and fertility (Carlsen et al., 1992, 1995; Auger
`et al., 1995; and references therein) which, if real, may be
`
`associated with exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals
`(EDCs) in the environment, and in particular, those which
`mimic the action of natural estrogens (Sharpe et al., 1995). The
`importance of estrogen action on male reproduction is illus-
`trated by the fact that the ␣ form of the estrogen receptor
`(ER-␣), and the more recently discovered ER-␤, are expressed,
`alone or together, throughout the male reproductive tract (Hess
`et al., 1997; Fisher et al., 1997; Kuiper et al., 1996). Moreover,
`new evidence shows that estrogen regulates reabsorption of
`luminal fluid in the head of the epididymis and may therefore
`be an important determinant of sperm concentration and hence
`fertility (Hess et al., 1997). Although the reports on humans
`remain conjecture, a field of research embracing endocrinology
`and toxicology was created to resolve this issue.
`Although many natural and synthetic chemicals are in wide
`use and are ubiquitous in the environment, little is known about
`the potential risks to humans following exposure to known
`xenoestrogens, or their potential routes and levels of exposure.
`Furthermore, in the absence of a systematic study of all the
`major production chemicals, it is possible that humans are
`exposed to a number of, as yet, unidentified estrogenic chem-
`icals. This situation is further complicated by the fact that
`many xenoestrogens apparently bear little structural resem-
`blance to natural steroidal estrogens, although recent computer
`modeling studies demonstrate specific steric and electrostatic
`properties which may explain their ability to interact with the
`estrogen receptor (Waller et al., 1996). We therefore decided to
`test a group of alkyl hydroxy benzoate preservatives (parabens)
`for estrogenicity, due to their extensive use in a wide range of
`products to which humans are exposed, and also because of
`their structural similarity to alkylphenols (Fig. 1), which are
`known to be estrogenic (Soto et al., 1991; Routledge and
`Sumpter, 1997). We now report the findings from ensuing in
`vitro and in vivo studies in which a range of alkyl hydroxy
`benzoate preservatives (namely methyl-, ethyl-, propyl-, and
`butylparaben) were assessed for estrogenic activity.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: 01895 274 348;
`E-mail: edwin.routledge@brunel.ac.uk
`
`Chemicals. For the in vitro studies, methylparaben (MP), ethylparaben
`(EP), propylparaben (PP), butylparaben (BP), para-hydroxy benzoic acid
`(pHBA), 17␤-estradiol, and 4-hydroxy tamoxifen were all purchased from
`
`0041-008X/98 $25.00
`Copyright © 1998 by Academic Press
`All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
`
`12
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2006
`Page 1
`
`

`

`PARABENS ARE ESTROGENIC
`
`13
`
`this stage, control wells (blanks) appeared light orange in color, due to
`background expression of ␤-galactosidase, and turbid, due to growth of the
`yeast. Estrogenic chemicals were indicated by turbid wells in which a dose-
`dependent change in the color of the medium from light orange to red was
`detected.
`To demonstrate that the chemicals tested were acting through the estrogen
`receptor, the ability of 4-hydroxy tamoxifen, an estrogen antagonist known to
`act via the estrogen receptor, to inhibit the activity of PP and BP was
`investigated. A 2 mM stock solution of 4-hydroxy tamoxifen was serially
`diluted in ethanol, and 10-␮l aliquots of each concentration were transferred in
`duplicate to optically flat 96-well microtiter plates and allowed to evaporate to
`dryness (final concentration range 100 ␮M to 50 nM). Aliquots (200 ␮l) of the
`assay medium containing the recombinant yeast, the chromogenic substrate
`CPRG, and 17␤-estradiol (or the parabens) were then dispensed to the sample
`wells containing the 4-hydroxy tamoxifen. The concentration of 17␤-estradiol
`(or paraben) added to the medium was sufficient to produce an obvious, but not
`maximal, response. Controls were assay medium containing estradiol or para-
`bens (largest attainable response) and assay medium without the addition of
`17␤-estradiol or parabens (normal background expression). The plates were
`shaken, sealed, and incubated as before. The antiestrogenic activity of 4-hy-
`droxy tamoxifen was observed as a dose-dependent inhibition of the color
`change of the medium from yellow to red.
`
`Animals.
`Immature female Alpk:AP rats (21–22 days old; body weights
`38 –55 g) were obtained from the Zeneca breeding unit (Alderley Park).
`Ovariectomized (OVX) rats of the same strain were obtained from the same
`source. The ovariectomy was performed on 6 – 8-week-old animals. The latter
`were maintained for 2 weeks after the operation, during which time daily
`vaginal smears were taken, and only noncycling animals were used for the
`uterotrophic assays. Animal studies were performed in accordance with the UK
`“Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act.” Animal care and procedures were
`carried out according to in-house standards. All animals were housed in wire
`mesh cages; solid bottoms were provided for the immature animals. Temper-
`ature was controlled at 22° ⫾ 3, humidity was controlled at 30 –70%, and a 12
`h/12 h light dark cycle was maintained. Animals were weaned on R&M No. 3
`(Special Diet Services Ltd., Witham, Essex, UK) at postnatal Days 19 –21 and
`maintained on R&M No. 1 (Special Diet Services Ltd.) from postnatal Day 21
`onward. Diet and water were available ad libitum. Immature animals were
`acclimatized for 24 h before being dosed.
`
`Uterotrophic assays. The test protocol for both the immature rat and the
`OVX rat uterotrophic assays was as described previously (Odum et al., 1997;
`Ashby et al., 1997). Each experiment was accompanied by a vehicle control
`group (arachis oil) and a positive control group [17␤-estradiol (0.4 mg/kg/day
`body wt) by oral gavage or 17␤-estradiol (0.04 mg/kg/day body wt) by
`subcutaneous injection (sc) depending on the nature of the experiment (see
`Table 1]. Animals were dosed on three successive days with the appropriate
`chemical dissolved or suspended in arachis oil. A total dosing volume of 5
`ml/kg body wt was used initially (Table 1, Experiments 1 and 2), but this was
`increased to 10 ml/kg for the remaining experiments due to the low solubility
`of MP and BP. The maximum doses used were determined by the turbidity of
`the dosing solutions and restriction of dosing volume. In-house standard
`operating procedures allow a maximum sc dosing volume of 5 ml/kg, but
`special veterinary permission was obtained for the use of 10 ml/kg. The
`animals showed no signs of distress with these dosing volumes. Animals were
`killed by an overdose of halothane 24 h after the final dose. Vaginal opening
`(or otherwise) was recorded for immature animals at the time of death. Vaginal
`smears were also taken from OVX animals at the time of death. Uteri were
`excised, trimmed free of fat, pierced, and blotted to remove excess fluid. The
`body of the uterus was cut just above its junction with the cervix and at the
`junction of the uterine horns with the ovaries. The uterus was then weighed
`(wet weight). Uterine dry weight was also determined by drying the uteri at 70°
`for 24 h before reweighing. A quantitative estimation of vaginal cytology was
`performed by counting the number of fully cornified cells in at least 2 fields
`containing a total of at least 100 cells (⫻200 magnification).
`
`FIG. 1. Diagram illustrating the structural similarity of parabens and
`alkylphenolic chemicals. R ⫽ CH3 (A ⫽ methylparaben; B ⫽ methylphenol),
`R ⫽ C2H5 (A ⫽ ethylparaben; B ⫽ ethylphenol), R ⫽ C3H7 (A ⫽ propy-
`lparaben; B ⫽ propylphenol), and R ⫽ C4H9 (A ⫽ butylparaben; B ⫽
`butylphenol).
`
`Sigma (Poole, Dorset, UK). 4-Nonylphenol (95% pure) was supplied by
`Schenectady International, Inc. (Schenectady, NY). For the in vivo studies, MP
`was supplied by Aldrich Chemical Company (Gillingham, Dorset, UK), BP
`was supplied by Fluka Chemie AG (Switzerland), and arachis oil and 17␤-
`estradiol were purchased from Sigma. The purity of the all the chemicals used
`(unless stated otherwise) was greater than 99%.
`4-n-Dodecylparaben was prepared as described by Dymicky and Huhtanen
`(1979) and had mp 54 –56° (Dymicky and Huhtanen mp 37–37.5°). The carbon
`and hydrogen analysis was within 0.1% of theory. The required mass ion (306)
`was observed. The NMR spectrum (250 Mhz, CDCl3) was as predicted, and
`the IR spectrum showed a strong carbonyl absorption at 1678 cm⫺1.
`Competitive binding assay. The 105,000g supernatant, isolated as de-
`scribed by Shelby et al. (1996), from the uteri of immature rats was used as a
`source of cytosolic estrogen receptors in a competitive binding assay. The
`assay was conducted as previously described (Korach, 1979; Shelby et al.,
`1996). Aliquots of 100 ␮l cytosol, diluted to 500 ␮l, were incubated with
`[2,4,6,7-3H]-estradiol (5 nM) and different concentrations of unlabeled com-
`petitors (0.5 nM-500 ␮⌴) at 4°C for 18 h. The receptors were precipitated with
`hydroxyapatite in buffer (Shelby et al., 1996), washed with TEGM buffer,
`resuspended in Optiphase-MP scintillant (LKB Scintillation Products), and
`counted using a Packard 2000CA Tri-carb analyzer.
`The recombinant yeast estrogen screen. Details of the estrogen-inducible
`expression system in yeast (including assay validation and preparation of the
`medium components) have been described previously (Routledge and
`Sumpter, 1996). In brief, the DNA sequence of the human estrogen receptor
`was integrated into the yeast genome, which also contained expression plas-
`mids carrying estrogen-responsive sequences controlling the expression of the
`reporter gene Lac-Z (encoding the enzyme ␤-galactosidase). Thus, in the
`presence of estrogens, ␤-galactosidase is synthesized and secreted into the
`medium, where it breaks down the chromogenic substrate chlorophenol red-
`␤-D-galactopyranoside (CPRG), which is initially yellow, into a red product
`that can be measured spectroscopically.
`Yeast screen procedure. Stock solutions of MP, EP, PP, BP (10 mM), and
`17␤-estradiol (200 nM) were serially diluted in ethanol, and 10-␮l aliquots of
`each concentration were transferred, in duplicate, to optically flat 96-well
`microtiter plates and allowed to evaporate to dryness. Aliquots (200 ␮l) of the
`assay medium containing the recombinant yeast and the chromogenic substrate
`CPRG were then dispensed to each sample well. Thus, the parabens were
`diluted in twofold steps from 500 ␮M to 250 nM, and 17␤-estradiol was
`diluted from 10 nM to 5 pM in the medium, respectively. Appropriate solvent
`controls (blanks) were also included. The plates were sealed with autoclave
`tape and shaken vigorously for 2 min on a titer plate shaker before incubation
`at 32°C. After an 84-h incubation, the color of the medium was read at an
`absorbance of 540 nm (using a Titertek Multiskan MCC/340 plate reader). At
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2006
`Page 2
`
`

`

`14
`
`ROUTLEDGE ET AL.
`
`FIG. 2. Competitive binding to isolated estrogen receptors of diethylstilbestrol (DES), 4-nonylphenol, and butylparaben. Data are derived from duplicate
`samples taken from a representative experiment.
`
`Statistics. Variation within experiments for uterus wet and dry weights
`was determined by analysis of variance using the GLM procedure described in
`SAS (1989). Percentages of cornified cells were also considered by analysis of
`variance, following a double arcsine transformation (Freeman and Tukey,
`1950). Differences from control values were assessed statistically using a
`two-sided Student’s t test based on the error mean square from the analysis of
`variance.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Competitive Binding Assay
`
`Figure 2 shows that butylparaben was able to compete with
`3H-estradiol for binding to the rat estrogen receptor with an
`affinity approximately five orders of magnitude lower than that
`of diethylstilboestrol and between one and two orders of mag-
`nitude less than 4-nonylphenol. In this test system, receptor
`binding occured in the absence of metabolic conversion, indi-
`cating that the parent compound itself (as opposed to a metab-
`olite) may be the active form. The receptor-binding affinities of
`diethylstilboestrol and 4-nonylphenol are comparable with
`those reported by Shelby et al. (1996).
`
`Estrogenic Activity of Parabens in the Yeast Screen
`
`Figure 3 shows the response of the yeast estrogen screen to
`varying concentrations of p-hydroxybenzoic acid (pHBA), MP,
`EP, PP, and BP compared to 17␤-estradiol. All of the parabens
`tested were found to be estrogenic in vitro, whereas the parent
`compound (and a main metabolite) pHBA was inactive (Fig.
`3B). MP (R ⫽ CH3) produced the weakest response in the
`screen and was approximately 2,500,000-fold less potent than
`17␤-estradiol (Fig. 3A). The magnitude of the estrogenic re-
`
`sponse increased with alkyl group size, as shown by the fact
`that EP (R ⫽ C2H5), PP (R ⫽ C3H7), and BP (R ⫽ C4H9) were
`approximately 150,000-fold, 30,000-fold, and 10,000-fold less
`potent than 17␤-estradiol, respectively (Fig. 3A). Propylpara-
`ben was found to be equivalent in potency to 4-nonylphenol,
`whereas butylparaben was 3-fold more potent. 4-n-Dode-
`cylparaben (containing an unbranched linear alkyl group com-
`posed of 12 carbons) was also tested in order to investigate the
`effect of longer alkyl chain derivatives, which have greater
`antimicrobial activity (Dymicky and Huhtanen, 1979). 4-n-
`Dodecylparaben was inactive over the concentration range
`tested, and there was no evidence of toxic effects on the yeast
`even at a concentration of 500 ␮M (Fig. 3A).
`
`Inhibition of the Estrogenic Activity of Parabens by 4-
`Hydroxy Tamoxifen
`
`The ability of the antiestrogen 4-hydroxy tamoxifen to in-
`hibit the effect of PP and BP was used to demonstrate the
`requirement of these compounds to interact with the estrogen
`receptor in order to show estrogenic activity. Yeast cells were
`incubated in the presence and absence of either PP or BP at
`concentrations required to produce a distinct, but not maximal,
`response and concurrently with varying concentrations of 4-hy-
`droxy tamoxifen. Figure 4 illustrates that in the absence of PP
`or BP, the final background absorbance of the medium (A540)
`remained approximately 0.9. In the presence of PP or BP, the
`increased synthesis of ␤-galactosidase elevated the absorbance
`of the medium to approximately 2.6. Wells in which the
`chemicals were incubated concurrently with varying doses of
`4-hydroxy tamoxifen all showed a dose-dependent inhibition
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2006
`Page 3
`
`

`

`PARABENS ARE ESTROGENIC
`
`15
`
`FIG. 3. Response of the yeast estrogen screen to a range of parabens of varying alkyl group size, para-hydroxybenzoic acid (the parent compound and a main
`⬃ 2.7) at the highest concentrations are not shown. (A) The graph depicts
`metabolite), and 4-nonylphenol (an established xenoestrogen). Maximal responses (A540
`the log concentration of 17␤-estradiol (E2) serially diluted from 10 nM to 5 pM, and methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, butylparaben, 4-n-
`dodecylparaben diluted from 500 ␮M and 250 nM, plotted against the absorbance of the medium after a 3-day incubation. (B) Comparison of the estrogenic
`activity of butylparaben with para-hydroxybenzoic acid (diluted from 500 ␮M down to 250 nM) and 4-nonylphenol (diluted from 2 mM down to 1 ␮M). The
`blank depicts the basal level of expression in the assay.
`
`of ␤-galactosidase expression, indicating that all the com-
`pounds are acting via the estrogen receptor. The activity of
`17␤-estradiol was also inhibited by 4-hydroxy tamoxifen in a
`dose-dependent manner, as expected (results not shown).
`
`Uterotrophic Responses to MP and BP
`
`As the MP and BP used in the uterotrophic assays were
`obtained from different sources from those used in the in vitro
`tests, a sample of each chemical was also tested in the yeast
`screen, as described previously. Both the MP and BP used in
`the in vivo studies were found to be estrogenic in vitro, and
`their relative potencies were consistent with those illustrated in
`Fig. 3A (results not shown).
`MP and BP (which were, respectively, the least and most
`potent parabens in vitro) were tested in immature and OVX rat
`
`uterotrophic assays by oral and subcutaneous routes. The im-
`mature and OVX uterotrophic assays are generally considered
`to give comparable results (Zacharewski, 1998), but some
`weak estrogens may be more active in one or other of the
`assays (Ashby et al., 1997). The results of the immature rat
`uterotrophic assays on MP and BP are shown in Table 1. MP
`(administered orally or subcutaneously at dose levels of up to
`800 mg MP/kg/day) failed to increase uterus weights in im-
`mature rats (Table 1, Experiment 3). However, BP produced a
`small (but statistically insignificant) increase in uterus wet and
`dry weights in immature rats when given orally at dose levels
`from 800 mg BP/kg/day up to 1200 mg BP/kg/day (Table 1).
`Subcutaneous administration of BP significantly increased
`uterus wet weights in animals given doses between 400 and
`800 mg BP/kg/day, and a dose of 1200 mg BP/kg/day in-
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2006
`Page 4
`
`

`

`16
`
`ROUTLEDGE ET AL.
`
`tance, biodegradability, and cost (inexpensive), also because
`they are considered to be safe (Elder, 1984). Moreover, their
`excellent chemical stability in relation to pH (effective between
`pH 4.5–7.5) and temperature means that products can be safely
`autoclaved without significant loss of antimicrobial activity as
`a result of hydrolysis (Maddox, 1982).
`The antimicrobial activity of parabens increases concur-
`rently with alkyl chain length, but their water solubility de-
`creases and oil solubility increases. Since microbial replication
`generally occurs in the water phase of oil/water bases, the
`amount of paraben dissolved in the water phase generally
`determines the preservative efficacy (Dal Pozzo and Pastori,
`1996). For this reason, the lower alkyl chain members of the
`homologous series are often preferred in formulations. How-
`ever, it
`is common to find combinations of two or more
`paraben homologues (with different solubility characteristics)
`within a single product, in order to increase the ability of the
`system to withstand microbial contaminations (Dal Pozzo and
`Pastori, 1996).
`In recent years, the toxicology of parabens has been thoroughly
`reviewed in the EEC and US, which has led to p-hydroxybenzo-
`ates being more widely permitted in foods in the UK and to their
`GRAS (generally recognised as safe) status being reconfirmed by
`the US FDA (use limits of 0.1% w/w for MP and PP in food). The
`average daily intake of parabens in food is estimated to be 1–16
`mg/kg for infants and 4–6 mg/kg for persons aged 2 years or
`older (Elder, 1984). Maximum levels of parabens in pharmaceu-
`tical products seldom exceed 1% w/w, and the EEC directive
`76/768/EEC and the Danish cosmetic regulations permit the pres-
`ervation of cosmetic products with MP, EP, PP, and BP up to a
`maximum combined concentration of 0.8% w/w. Parabens pre-
`serve fats, proteins, oils, and gums in hair shampoos and condi-
`tioners, skin care products (cleansers and moisturisers), colognes,
`perfumes, toothpastes, soaps, and a range of make-up and sun-
`care products (Elder, 1984; Sherma and Zorn, 1982; Rastogi et al.,
`1995). In a recent survey of 215 cosmetic products, 77% of the
`rinse-off products and 99% of the leave-on products contained
`parabens (Rastogi et al., 1995). Therefore, products containing
`parabens may be applied to the skin, hair, scalp, lips, mucosae
`(oral, ocular, vaginal), and nails, either occasionally or on a daily
`basis, and their use may extend over a period of years. Thus, the
`frequency and duration of application (and therefore exposure of
`humans to parabens) both orally and topically may be continuous
`(Elder, 1984).
`The ability of parabens to pass through the stratum corneum
`(the uppermost barrier layer of the skin) increases with ester chain
`length (Twist and Zatz, 1986; Lee and Kim, 1994). Skin metab-
`olism (esterase activity) itself may also contribute to increased
`passive diffusion of parabens as a consequence of enhanced
`diffusion gradients, the capacity of which may be homologue
`specific (Bando et al., 1997). However, the potential for percuta-
`neous absorption of parabens is also influenced by their relative
`distribution in the oil/water phases of formulations, and these are
`often altered by the addition of surfactants (solubilizers) or by
`
`FIG. 4.
`Inhibition of the estrogenic activity of parabens by 4-hydroxy
`tamoxifen. Yeast cells were incubated in the absence or presence of parabens
`and concurrently with varying doses of 4-hydroxy tamoxifen. The yeast cells
`were incubated with butylparaben (BP; 1 x 10-5 M) and propylparaben (PP: 4 x
`10-5 M) either alone (PP or BP) or concurrently with 4-hydroxytamoxifen
`(PP⫹T or BP⫹T) at various concentrations. The blank depicts the normal
`background absorbance of the medium (without the addition of parabens).
`
`creased uterus wet weights to approximately 170% that of
`control values (Table 1, Fig. 5). The lowest dose of BP which
`induced a significant uterotrophic response was 200 mg BP/
`kg/day. The increase in dry weights eliminates the possibility
`that the gain in uterine weight following exposure to butylpara-
`ben was due solely to water retention. Neither paraben caused
`premature vaginal opening in any experiment, unlike estradiol,
`where premature vaginal opening was routinely observed
`(Odum et al., 1997).
`In the OVX rat uterotrophic assay, subcutaneous adminis-
`tration of 800 mg MP/kg/day failed to increase uterus weight
`and vaginal cornification (Fig. 6). In contrast, subcutaneous
`administration of BP significantly increased uterus wet and dry
`weight up to 150% of control values at a dose of 1200 mg
`BP/kg/day (Fig. 6). Subcutaneous exposure to BP (1000 mg
`BP/kg/day) significantly increased vaginal cornification (Fig.
`6), but an increase in vaginal cornification was also observed in
`rats exposed subcutaneously to 800 mg BP/kg/day, although
`this response was not statistically significant due to large
`interanimal variation.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Parabens were firstly employed as preservatives in pharma-
`ceutical products in the mid 1920s (Sabalitschka, 1930) and
`were extensively used in foodstuffs and cosmetics shortly
`afterward. In 1981, the Food and Drug Administration reported
`the use of MP, EP, PP, and BP in over 13,200 formulations
`(Elder, 1984). The popular use of paraben preservatives in
`cosmetics and toiletries arises from their low toxicity, inert-
`ness, broad spectrum of activity, worldwide legislative accep-
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2006
`Page 5
`
`

`

`PARABENS ARE ESTROGENIC
`
`17
`
`TABLE 1
`The Activity of Methyl and Butylparaben in the Immature Rat Uterotrophic Assay
`
`Uterus weight (mg)
`
`Expt.
`number
`
`Compound
`
`Dose (mg/kg)
`
`Route
`
`Group
`size
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`Arachis oil
`Butyl paraben
`
`E2
`Arachis oil
`Butyl paraben
`
`E2
`Arachis oil
`Methyl paraben
`
`Butyl paraben
`
`E2
`Arachis oil
`Butyl paraben
`
`E2
`Arachis oil
`Butyl paraben
`
`E2
`
`5 ml
`4 mg/kg/day
`40 mg/kg/day
`400 mg/kg/day
`0.4 mg/kg/day
`5 ml/kg/day
`800 mg/kg/day
`1200 mg/kg/day
`0.4 mg/kg/day
`10 ml/kg/day
`40 mg/kg/day
`400 mg/kg/day
`800 mg/kg/day
`40 mg/kg/day
`80 mg/kg/day
`40 mg/kg/day
`400 mg/kg/day
`0.4 mg/kg/day
`10 ml/kg/day
`40 mg/kg/day
`200 mg/kg/day
`400 mg/kg/day
`600 mg/kg/day
`800 mg/kg/day
`0.04 mg/kg/day
`10 ml/kg/day
`600 mg/kg/day
`800 mg/kg/day
`1000 mg/kg/day
`1200 mg/kg/day
`0.04 mg/kg/day
`
`Oral
`Oral
`Oral
`Oral
`Oral
`Oral
`Oral
`Oral
`Oral
`Oral
`Oral
`Oral
`Oral
`sc
`sc
`sc
`sc
`Oral
`sc
`sc
`sc
`sc
`sc
`sc
`sc
`sc
`sc
`sc
`sc
`sc
`sc
`
`5
`5
`5
`5
`5
`7
`5
`5
`5
`5
`5
`5
`5
`5
`5
`5
`5
`5
`10
`5
`5
`5
`5
`5
`5
`10
`5
`5
`5
`5
`5
`
`Wet
`
`34.0 ⫾ 4.6
`30.7 ⫾ 2.7
`32.0 ⫾ 5.6
`30.1 ⫾ 6.2
`115.1 ⫾ 12.5**
`28.2 ⫾ 5.2
`35.5 ⫾ 9.3
`33.2 ⫾ 6.4
`117.5 ⫾ 8.9**
`33.8 ⫾ 5.9
`34.5 ⫾ 3.2
`33.3 ⫾ 5.3
`31.0 ⫾ 4.3
`33.5 ⫾ 6.6
`32.8 ⫾ 1.5
`38.0 ⫾ 6.8
`41.6 ⫾ 6.5**
`122.7 ⫾ 9.4**
`30.3 ⫾ 3.8
`33.6 ⫾ 4.7
`32.6 ⫾ 2.8
`33.7 ⫾ 3.7
`42.3 ⫾ 3.5**
`47.6 ⫾ 4.9**
`116.2 ⫾ 10.2**
`27.1 ⫾ 4.7
`32.0 ⫾ 5.4
`38.8 ⫾ 7.6**
`42.6 ⫾ 3.9**
`47.1 ⫾ 2.6**
`108.7 ⫾ 16.4**
`
`Dry
`
`6.5 ⫾ 1.0
`6.2 ⫾ 0.2
`6.5 ⫾ 1.4
`6.5 ⫾ 1.4
`20.5 ⫾ 1.5**
`6.3 ⫾ 1.5
`7.5 ⫾ 1.8
`7.8 ⫾ 2.9
`22.5 ⫾ 1.8**
`6.4 ⫾ 0.9
`6.8 ⫾ 0.7
`6.3 ⫾ 0.9
`6.2 ⫾ 0.7
`6.8 ⫾ 1.1
`6.6 ⫾ 0.3
`7.6 ⫾ 1.3
`8.6 ⫾ 1.0*
`21.7 ⫾ 1.9**
`5.6 ⫾ 0.5
`6.1 ⫾ 0.8
`6.4 ⫾ 0.4*
`6.4 ⫾ 0.4*
`7.9 ⫾ 0.7**
`9.0 ⫾ 0.9**
`18.3 ⫾ 3.9**
`5.6 ⫾ 1.1
`6.6 ⫾ 1.1**
`7.6 ⫾ 1.5**
`8.5 ⫾ 0.7**
`9.1 ⫾ 0.7**
`18.9 ⫾ 2.8**
`
`Note. Estradiol (E2) was used as a positive control. Data are mean ⫾ SD. *denotes P ⬍ 0.05, **P ⬍ 0.01.
`
`their entrapment in micelles and liposomes (Komatsu, 1984;
`Komatsu et al., 1986), which adds another level of complexity to
`their behavior in topically applied products. Certain solubilizers
`may reduce absorption of parabens through the skin (Komatsu
`and Suzuki, 1979). However, even low penetration rates could
`result in considerable amounts of these chemicals entering the
`body from commercial preparations, which are often applied to
`large surface areas of skin (Dal Pozzo and Pastori, 1996). It is
`apparent that topical exposure of humans to parabens will depend
`largely on the product formulation within which they are con-
`tained and the pattern of product use.
`Early animal studies generally suggest that parabens are rapidly
`metabolized and excreted. In these studies, the majority of the
`dose (up to 800 mg/kg) was recovered in the urine and feaces as
`p-hydroxybenzoic acid (pHBA), p-hydroxyhippuric acid (M1),
`p-hydroxybenzoyl glucuronide (M3), and p-carboxyphenyl sul-
`fate (M4) up to 72 h after exposure (Elder, 1984). However, as
`metabolism and elimination rates of parabens are believed to be
`dose-, route- (Kiwada et al., 1979), and probably species-depen-
`
`dent, and because the doses employed in the majority of animal
`studies (including this study) were short term and greatly ex-
`ceeded realistic doses in humans (Kiwada et al., 1979), the appli-
`cation of these findings in terms of an assessment of a possible
`estrogenic hazard are equivocal. However, when rats were ex-
`posed to 2 mg radiolabeled EP/kg (the presumed dose of practical
`usage in humans) by intravenous injection, approximately 170 ␮g
`was recovered as pHBA and 860, 600, and 140 ␮g were recovered
`as M1, M3, and M4, respectively. Excretion had almost ceased by
`5 h, after which time 180 ␮g of the total dose had appeared as
`unidentified metabolites, 50 ␮g was unrecovered, and about 600
`ng occurred in the urine as unmetabolized EP (Kiwada et al.,
`1979). Hydrolysis occured rapidly in the blood, with only 5%
`(100 ␮g) of the initial dose remaining as the parent EP 3 min after
`the injection, with levels decreasing rapidly (Kiwada et al., 1980)
`due to carboxyesterase activity in the blood, liver, and other
`tissues. This rapid metabolism of parabens may explain, in part,
`why butylparaben was approximately 2 to 3 orders of magnitude
`more potent in vitro (Fig. 3A) compared to subcutaneous admin-
`
`UCB Biopharma SPRL (IPR2019-00400)
`Exhibit 2006
`Page 6
`
`

`

`18
`
`ROUTLEDGE ET AL.
`
`FIG. 5. The effects of subcutaneous administration of butylparaben on uterus wet weights of immature rats. Estradiol (E2) (0.04 mg/kg, sc) was used a
`positive control. Controls received arachis oil only. The three studies (Experiments 3–5) shown in Table 1 were combined and statistically analyzed, as described
`in Materials and Methods. Data represent the adjusted means ⫾ SD of the consolidated data. The number above the bar represents the consolidated group size.
`Statistical significance is taken from Table 1. *P ⬍ 0.05, **P ⬍ 0.01. No open vaginas were observed in control and butylparaben-treated animals, whereas 5/10
`animals in the E2-treated group had open vaginas.
`
`istration in vivo (Figs. 5 and 6). Thus, it appears that parabens are
`rapidly absorbed, metabolized, and excreted, but the presence of
`unmetabolized paraben in the urine, together with incomplete
`recoveries, suggests that low levels of unmetabolized paraben
`(presumably the only estrogenic form) may remain in circulation
`in the body for extended periods of time.
`The results presented in Fig. 3A indicate that parabens
`possess intrinsic estrogenic activity with a potency between
`104- and 107-fold lower than that of the main natural estrogen
`
`FIG. 6. The effects of subcutaneous administration of methylparaben and
`butylparaben on uterus wet and dry weights (A and B) of OVX rats. Vaginal
`cornification (mean percentage of cornified cells) is indicated in the white
`boxes in A. Estradiol (E2) (0.04 mg/kg, sc) was used a positive control.
`Controls received arachis oil only. Data represent group means ⫾ SD. The
`number above the bar represents the group size, which was the same for both
`determinations. **P ⬍ 0.01, *P ⬍ 0.05.
`
`17␤-estradiol, and their ability to transactivate the estrogen
`receptor in vitro increases concurrently with alkyl group size.
`Similar findings have been reported with alkylphenolic chem-
`icals, in which estrogenic activity was dependent on alkyl
`group size and branching (Routledge and Sumpter, 1997). In
`view of this, parabens with longer and/or branched alkyl
`groups (e.g., heptylparaben,
`isopropylparaben, and isobu-
`tylparaben) and their metabolites (when known and available)
`should also be assessed for estrogenicity activity. Thus, the
`present data should stimulate further focused studies.
`Evaluation of the activity of MP and BP in rodent utero-
`trophic assays was complicated by the relative insolubility
`of the methyl compound, but
`the butyl compound was
`shown to be weakly estrogenic when administered via sub-
`cutaneous injection. Both compounds were inactive when
`administered to rats orally at the maximum practical dose
`level. The physicochemical properties of the parabens indi-
`cate that they can be absorbed across skin, and that suggests
`a possible estrogenic hazard to humans exposed topically to
`such chemicals. However, a more meaningful assessment of
`the effects of exposure to environmentally relevant concen-
`trations of estrogenic chemicals will requi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket