`
`_______________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`________________________
`
`HEALTH CARE LOGISTICS, INC.
`Petitioner,
`v.
`KIT CHECK, INC.
`Patent Owner
`_________________________
`Case IPR. No. Unassigned
`U.S. Patent No. 9,367,665
`Title: MANAGEMENT OF PHARMACY KITS
`_________________________
`
`PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S.
`PATENT NO. 9,367,665
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`Page 1 of 9
`
`Health Care Logistics, Inc.
` Exhibit 1003
`
`
`
`I, Behbood Ben Zoghi, declare as follows:
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1.
`
`I have been retained by Petitioner, Health Care Logistics, Inc., relative to its Petitions for
`
`inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 8,990,099 (“the ’099 Patent”); U.S. Patent No.
`
`9,058,412 (“the ’412 Patent); U.S. Patent No. 9,058,413 (“the ’413 Patent); U.S. Patent
`
`No. 9,367,665 (“the ’665 Patent”); and U.S. Patent No. 9,805,169 (“the ’169 Patent”). I
`
`am being compensated at an hourly rate of $300/hour for time spent preparing this
`
`Declaration. My compensation is not contingent on the outcome of the matter for which
`
`this Declaration was prepared. I have no financial interest in this matter.
`
`2.
`
`In preparation for this Declaration, I have read and become familiar with the nature of the
`
`subject matter described and claimed in the ’099, ’412, ’413, ’665, and ’169 Patents and
`
`of the other documents identified in this Declaration.
`
`3.
`
`I have been informed that the earliest priority date of any of the ’099, ’412, ’413, ’665,
`
`and ’169 Patents is August 2, 2011.
`
`4.
`
`I have personal knowledge of the facts stated in this Declaration, and unless stated
`
`otherwise herein, and I would testify truthfully to those facts if called as a witness.
`
`5. Due to my education and the extensive relevant experience as summarized in Section II
`
`below and further demonstrated in the attached curriculum vitae (HCL-1004), I have
`
`personal knowledge of what would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the
`
`art in the August 2011 timeframe.
`
`Page 2 of 9
`
`Health Care Logistics, Inc.
` Exhibit 1003
`
`
`
`II.
`
`BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS
`
`6.
`
`I received a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Seattle University in 1982 as
`
`well as a M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from The Ohio State University in 1986
`
`and a Ph.D. in Bioengineering/Electrical Engineering from Texas A&M University in
`
`1993. Attached to this Expert Report, as HCL-1004, is a true and correct copy of my
`
`curriculum vitae.
`
`7. From 1999 to the present I have been a tenured professor at Texas A&M, where I have
`
`taught various courses in Electronics Engineering Technology, among others. I am the
`
`Victor H. Thompson Professor of Electronic Systems, as well as Director of Master of
`
`Engineering Technical Management.
`
`8.
`
`I have taught senior level students at Texas A&M about RFID systems.
`
`9.
`
`I have also served as Director of the RFID Oil & Gas Solution group consortium, and
`
`currently serve as the Director of the Texas A&M RFID/Sensor Technology Lab.
`
`10. I have led various research projects involving RFID technology, including, but not
`
`limited to, projects analyzing RFID solutions for various applications in the railroad,
`
`automotive traffic, oil & gas, library, cargo security, and inventory management
`
`industries. Many of these projects occurred prior to August 2011.
`
`11. I am co-author on a book titled “RFID APPLICATIONS AND CASES” that was published in
`
`December 2010.
`
`12. I have written numerous journal publications and white papers regarding various
`
`applications of RFID technology.
`
`13. I have presented at many conferences and seminars, including numerous presentations at
`
`RFID Journal conferences both nationally and internationally.
`
`Page 3 of 9
`
`Health Care Logistics, Inc.
` Exhibit 1003
`
`
`
`III.
`
`BASICS OF RFID TECHNOLOGY
`
`14. Radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology is based generally on the use of
`
`electromagnetic fields to remotely read special (RFID) tags that can be attached to various
`
`items.
`
`15. A basic RFID system consists of the following three components: (1) one or more RFID
`
`tags; (2) a reader; and (3) enterprise (e.g., “back end”) software. Such a system is
`
`schematically illustrated below:
`
`Tags
`
`Reader
`
`Host Computer
`with Enterprise
`Software
`
`16. RFID systems like those described in ¶ 15 above were well known and widely used
`
`significantly prior to August 2, 2010. In fact, I am personally aware that such RFID
`
`systems were known and in use at least as early as 2001.
`
`17. RFID tags generally consist of three basic components:
`
`a. Microchip: stores data related to the object to which the tag is attached. Data may
`
`be programmed at the point of manufacture by the factory, or by the end user (“field
`
`programming”).
`
`b. Receiver: receives information/power from the reader (or “interrogator”).
`
`c. Transmitter: sends information back to the reader.
`
`18. RFID tags are sometimes also referred to as “transponders.”
`
`19. Information stored on an RFID tag can range from as little as an identification number, to
`
`kilo-bytes of data.
`
`Page 4 of 9
`
`Health Care Logistics, Inc.
` Exhibit 1003
`
`
`
`20. RFID tag data stored on the microchip usually contains unique identification information
`
`referred to as an “Electronic Product Code” (EPC) that allows RFID tags to be used to
`
`uniquely identify different items that to which they are attached.
`
`21. The unique identification number may also be used to relate a particular item bearing a
`
`particular RFID tag with information stored in one or more databases.
`
`22. An RFID tag may also contain additional information such as, but certainly not limited to,
`
`item history, manufacturer, age of equipment, expiration, etc.
`
`23. RFID tags may be “passive,” “active,” or “semi-passive.” Passive tags do not contain an
`
`onboard power source. In order to operate they harness the energy received from the reader
`
`(or “interrogator”). They only transmit information when the RF energy received from the
`
`reader activates their internal circuitry.
`
`24. In a passive system, an RFID tag is typically activated or interrogated by a reader using an
`
`antenna, which may be a separate component or may be integrated into the reader.
`
`25. Active RFID tags, on the other hand, have onboard power and transmit information as long
`
`as their power source allows.
`
`26. Semi-passive tags have an onboard power supply, but communicate using backscatter.
`
`27. The information on an RFID tag can be transferred to a reader wirelessly from a distance.
`
`Thus, a transfer of data from an RFID tag does not require the reader to be present in the
`
`line of sight of the tag.
`
`28. It was understood in the art well before August 2, 2010, that another advantage of RFID
`
`technology over other known technology, such bar code systems, is that RFID technology
`
`allows a single reader to read multiple RFID tags at the same time, thereby significantly
`
`hastening the scanning process and the subsequent processing of the RFID tag data.
`
`Page 5 of 9
`
`Health Care Logistics, Inc.
` Exhibit 1003
`
`
`
`29. A reader of an RFID system can either filter all of the data received from one or more RFID
`
`tags or directly transfer all of said data to a host system, which runs an enterprise software
`
`application.
`
`30. Enterprise software may place a diverse role in an RFID system, from filtering the
`
`percolated tag data further, to making rule-based decisions, generating notifications,
`
`maintaining a comprehensive database for each asset, passing on tag information to other
`
`business applications, etc. In short, enterprise applications can be configured to process
`
`RFID tag data in many different ways, depending on the application, in order to produce
`
`meaningful decision-making outputs.
`
`31. Depending on the industry, enterprise software may be “Warehouse Management
`
`Software” (“WMS”) that is used by companies to manage and track inventory.
`
`32. Depending on the industry, enterprise software may have kitting functionality that is usable
`
`to manage/inventory/verify kits of items, such as but not limited to, verifying whether or
`
`not all of some expected number and/or type of items are present in a given kit.
`
`33. I am personally aware that well before August 2, 2010, at least Globeranger Corporation
`
`and Shipcom Wireless (both based in Texas) produced enterprise software that had the
`
`ability to process passive RFID tag data for use in a warehousing or kitting environment.
`
`34. I am personally familiar with the capabilities of the enterprise software applications
`
`referenced in ¶ 33 as they existed at a time before August 2, 2010.
`
`35. I am personally aware that, prior to August 2, 2010, the enterprise software applications
`
`referenced in ¶ 33 were capable of tracking the number of items in a given inventory.
`
`Page 6 of 9
`
`Health Care Logistics, Inc.
` Exhibit 1003
`
`
`
`36. I am personally aware that, prior to August 2, 2010, the enterprise software applications
`
`referenced in ¶ 33 were capable of identifying when an amount of items in inventory meet
`
`a preset threshold amount.
`
`37. I am personally aware that, prior to August 2, 2010, the enterprise software applications
`
`referenced in ¶ 33 were capable of tracking item expiration information (e.g., expiration
`
`dates).
`
`38. I am personally aware that, prior to August 2, 2010, the enterprise software applications
`
`referenced in ¶ 33 were capable of identifying classes and/or categories of items.
`
`39. I am personally aware that, prior to August 2, 2010, the enterprise software applications
`
`referenced in ¶ 33 were capable of identifying relationships between items in inventory
`
`such that one item could be identified by the software as an alternate/equivalent/substitute
`
`for another item.
`
`40. I am personally aware that, prior to August 2, 2010, the enterprise software applications
`
`referenced in ¶ 33 were capable of determining whether a particular item is present or
`
`missing from a given inventory.
`
`41. I am personally aware that, prior to August 2, 2010, the enterprise software applications
`
`referenced in ¶ 33 were capable of querying information pertaining to one or more items,
`
`which may include querying a database containing information about the one or more
`
`items.
`
`42. I am personally aware that, prior to August 2, 2010, the enterprise software applications
`
`referenced in ¶ 33 were capable of working with a template/list/bill of materials to establish
`
`predetermined requirements for a given inventory, and comparing an actual inventory as
`
`Page 7 of 9
`
`Health Care Logistics, Inc.
` Exhibit 1003
`
`
`
`Page 8 of 9
`
`Health Care Logistics, Inc.
` Exhibit 1003
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R §§ 42.6(e) and 42.105, I certify that on this 30th day
`
`of November, 2018, I caused to have served a copy of this POWER OF
`
`ATTORNEY by Federal Express Next Business Day Delivery on the following
`
`addresses for patent owner(s) and their representatives that are listed in the
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office’s public records:
`
`Kit Check, Inc.
`1875 Connecticut Ave. NW #300
`Washington, DC 20009
`
`Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
`2040 Main St.
`14th Floor
`Irvine, CA 92614
`
`/Beverly A. Marsh/
`Beverly A. Marsh (Reg. No. 62,302)
`STANDLEY LAW GROUP LLP
`6300 Riverside Dr.
`Dublin, OH 43107
`(614) 792-5555 (telephone)
`(614) 792-5536 (fax)
`
`Page 9 of 9
`
`Health Care Logistics, Inc.
` Exhibit 1003
`
`