throbber
Case 3:08-cv-01512-CAB-MDD Document 407-6 Filed 10/27/11 PageID.19259 Page 1 of 13
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT DTX-5150-R
`
`ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC., ALPHATEC SPINE INC. v. NUVASIVE INC.
`IPR2019-00362, Ex. 1055, p. 1 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 3:08-cv-01512-CAB-MDD Document 407-6 Filed 10/27/11 PageID.19260 Page 2 of 13
`SPINE Volume 18 Number 14 pp 21062117
`1993
`Company
`
`Lippincott
`
`Carbon Fiber Implant
`Lumbar Fusion
`
`to Aid Interbody
`
`Two-Year Clinical Results in the First 26 Patients
`
`John
`
`Brantigan MD and Arthur
`
`Steffee MDt
`
`and
`
`postoperative
`
`collapse
`
`of
`
`the donor
`
`bone
`
`and
`
`The success of posterior
`
`lumbar
`
`has been
`
`PLIF
`
`deficiencies
`
`interbody fusion
`limited by mechanical
`and biologic
`bone The authors have
`the donor
`
`fiber-reinforced
`
`polymer
`and biologic
`
`functions
`
`designed
`car
`implant that separates the
`of PLIF The cagelike
`
`of
`
`bon
`
`mechanical
`
`implant provides an actual
`
`failed backs with
`
`cage
`
`levels
`
`statistically significant
`
`difference
`
`at
`
`good in 10/26
`results were
`
`poor
`
`fair
`
`problems
`plant achieved
`
`unrelated
`
`followed patients
`body fusion
`
`successful
`
`fusion
`
`treated
`
`for
`
`identifiable
`
`inter-
`
`multi-centered
`prospective controlled
`words interbody fusion
`study is being initiated
`PLIF AIJF carbon cage allograft
`screw
`
`pedicle
`
`the
`to meet
`device designed
`the do
`and
`mechanical
`requirements of PLIF
`replaces
`nor bone with autologous
`bone the best
`bone
`possible
`for heating The authors report 2-year follow-up results
`patients 18 of whom were
`for their first 26 consecutive
`total of 37 previous
`postsurgical
`surgeries At
`years 28 of 28 PLIF
`fusion
`of 1154.5% allograft
`and
`levels exhibited
`fusion
`radiographic
`00002 Clinical
`
`in 3/26
`
`excellent
`
`in 11/26
`in 2/26 Fair and
`
`results were
`and poor
`attributable
`to objective
`to the carbon cage The carbon im
`in 6/6 100% of
`failed ETO allograft
`
`pseudarthrosis
`In 1985 Cloward1 claimed 87 to 92% clinical
`in his 40 years of PLIF surgery
`and 92% fusion success
`82% clinical
`and 88%
`Lin1718
`success
`reported
`and Ma9 has
`83% clinical
`success
`and 85% fusion
`
`success
`
`reported
`
`has
`
`fusion
`
`success
`
`success Unfortunately
`many
`had
`results with
`
`unsuccessful
`
`other
`
`have
`
`surgeons
`uninstrumented
`PLIF
`and
`have
`abandoned
`the pro
`cedure In our experience Dr Steffee did an early series
`of 12 uninstrumented PLIF procedures many years ago
`100% failure
`rate because
`of continued
`and
`had
`
`instability
`
`published
`
`publishing
`
`developed
`
`of
`
`the surgical construct This series was never
`because
`
`and
`editors both dislike
`authors
`studies Dr William Gazale who
`PLIF chisel
`has
`commercially
`produced
`
`unsuccessful
`
`results of uninstrumented PLIF at
`his surgical
`presented
`90% failure rate
`several meetings with approximately
`This study also has not been published
`More recently
`the use of pedicle
`screws
`have allowed surgeons
`to reduce degenerative
`the lumbar
`and maintain accurate
`mities
`of
`spine
`the motion segment
`positional control
`and
`in normal
`and
`coronal
`
`alignment
`
`of
`
`in anatomic
`
`and plates
`
`defor
`
`fusion PLIF pioneered by
`lumbar
`Posterior
`interbody
`Dr Ralph Cloward
`biomechan
`in the 1940s91
`ically optimum fusion
`successful PLIF maintains
`disc height
`the nerve
`
`is
`
`the
`
`roots restores weight-
`
`structures
`immobilizes the unstable
`
`restores
`
`the anulus
`
`to
`
`in
`
`protects
`to anterior
`
`bearing
`
`tension and
`
`tervertebral disc area
`
`degenerated
`successful PLIF restores
`
`every
`spinal unit except
`
`bleeding
`
`included
`
`excessive
`
`bone
`
`mechanical
`function
`of the functional
`motion Problems with PUP have
`the need
`for donor
`usually epidural
`of acquired immune deficiency
`with risk
`syndrome
`and hepatitis prolonged healing time of donor
`
`bone the difficulty
`
`of cutting
`
`precise bony channels
`
`the
`
`difficulty
`
`of providing sterile
`
`donor
`
`bone
`
`of precise
`
`dimensions
`
`the potential
`
`of
`
`instability the risk
`
`of
`
`retropulsion
`
`of graft
`
`and
`
`consequent
`
`neural
`
`damage
`
`From
`
`of Surgery
`the Department
`University Omaha Nebraska
`Creighton
`Arthritis Center Cleveland Ohio
`August 19 1992
`for publication
`Accepted
`
`Division
`
`of Orthopaedics
`and the tCleveland
`and
`
`Spine
`
`balance.2728
`
`plane
`sagittal
`have not however elimi
`Pedicle screws
`nated the need for weight-bearing
`support in the anterior
`column The likely
`lack of anterior column
`result of
`
`problem that
`
`is not solved by
`
`support is broken screws
`screw If
`
`stronger
`
`deformity is corrected
`
`is
`
`be
`
`restored physiologic
`
`anterior
`
`regained
`
`by use of interbody
`
`the
`
`in
`
`and
`
`often local bone
`
`cancellous
`
`blocks
`
`13
`
`graft
`
`decompression
`
`designing
`and disc space
`height
`column
`support must
`bone graft
`Of the first 697 pedicle screw/VSP
`cases done at
`Cleveland Spine
`and Arthritis Center PLIF was done
`at least one level in 501 cases or 71% Our standard PLIF
`fixation using pedicle
`includes segmental
`procedure326
`VSP plates
`in
`oxide sterilized
`screws
`ethylene
`terbody allograft most commonly
`25 mm and autologous posterolateral
`13
`from the posterior
`results are
`achieved
`graft remains
`
`satisfactory
`
`clinical
`
`Generally
`however
`the failure
`at about 30%
`The current problem has been the quality of the bone
`
`rate of
`
`the interbody
`
`2106
`
`DTX-51 50
`
`...
`
`12%I\R
`
`\1
`
`BR0002960
`
`ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC., ALPHATEC SPINE INC. v. NUVASIVE INC.
`IPR2019-00362, Ex. 1055, p. 2 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 3:08-cv-01512-CAB-MDD Document 407-6 Filed 10/27/11 PageID.19261 Page 3 of 13
`Carbon Implant
`
`Brantigan and Steffee
`
`2107
`
`for PLIF
`
`Figure
`
`Carbon-fiberreinforced
`
`polymer
`
`implant has
`hollow areas
`
`struts
`
`to
`
`the structure
`
`is
`
`retropulsion
`and
`
`graft
`
`to allow
`
`packing
`
`support weight-bearing ridges
`of autologous
`radiolucent
`to allow
`visualization
`graphic methods
`
`to resist
`
`bone
`
`of healing
`
`by normal
`
`radio
`
`Figure
`
`Cage
`
`finish
`
`broach of
`
`15-mm
`to the 11- 13- and
`are sized
`implants
`the ADS PLIF Broach System AcroMed Corp.
`
`ware More
`recently cages were
`made from long-fiber
`carbon
`ketone ketone obtained
`
`ether
`
`fabricated
`
`from composite
`ketone
`
`in Ultrapek poly ether
`from BASF Structural Materials
`
`graft which is less than optimum both biologically and as
`device The
`donor
`bone
`of PLIF
`
`load-bearing
`
`is
`
`Anaheim California Both materials
`
`demonstrate
`
`resistance
`
`all
`
`solvents
`
`except
`
`sulfuric
`
`acid
`
`and
`
`appear
`
`equivalent
`
`to
`
`in
`
`expected to serve both mechanical
`function The PLIF bone must
`
`device
`
`function
`
`and
`
`the PLIF
`
`properties
`
`previous
`
`study1
`
`properties
`
`in the disc
`
`the
`
`to the
`
`and mechanical
`biologic
`The cage
`implants are implanted in horizontally
`opposed
`space using the ADS
`channels
`transverse
`prepared
`PLIF Broach System AcroMed Corp. Figure
`shows
`standard
`sizes of carbon
`three
`fiber implants adjacent
`15-mm finish broaches
`
`11-mm 13-mm and
`implants are sized
`Between May 1989
`had surgery
`were
`including interbody fusion with the carbon cages Patients
`for use of the carbon cage device if they had failed PLIF
`with ETO bone
`traumatic spondy
`if they had high-grade or
`
`to which
`
`the
`
`and July 1990
`
`26 patients
`
`selected
`
`of
`
`bone-growth
`biologic
`bear substantially all of the bodys weight above
`level while it is being
`by the erosive process
`incorporated
`of creeping substitution We explored the mechanical
`of allograft bone for PLIF in
`bone
`
`the
`
`to be
`
`inadequate for the
`
`and
`found
`average
`function
`required mechanical
`We
`have
`carbon-fiberreinforced
`developed
`implant shown in Figure
`polymer
`fusion The implant has ridges or
`
`to aid interbody
`
`teeth to resist retro
`
`hollow area to allow
`
`graft
`
`and
`
`the
`
`carbon
`
`packing
`
`structure
`by normal
`the device
`
`chanical
`
`to support weight
`pulsion struts
`of autologous bone
`is radiolucent
`to allow visualization of healing
`techniques The cage
`implant
`radiographic
`and biologic
`of PLIF by
`functions
`separates
`the me
`device
`providing an actual
`to meet
`designed
`the donor
`requirements of PLIF and replacing
`bone with autologous cancellous
`bone the best possible
`bone
`for healing Mechanical
`of
`the implant
`isolated motion segments in cadaver spines have shown
`loads
`that cage struts support all anticipated
`and
`
`tests
`
`in
`
`compression
`
`the ridges
`
`or
`
`teeth
`
`resist
`
`retropulsion
`
`with
`
`than
`measured resistance to pullout
`three times greater
`of donor bone.4 The carbon fiber material
`that of blocks
`has modulus of elasticity approximating that of cortical
`bone.7 The purpose of
`on
`this article is to report
`the first 26 patients treated with the carbon cage
`who have
`reached the 2-year
`follow-up interval
`
`implant
`
`results
`
`Materials
`
`and Methods
`
`Initial
`
`cages were machined
`from blocks of composite made
`of 68% long-fiber
`in PEEK poly ether
`carbon fiber
`pyrolytic
`ICI Advanced Materials Wilmington Dela
`
`ether
`
`ketone
`
`support because
`lolisthesis if they required strong anterior
`difficulties with other devices
`at surgery or if they had
`had
`failure of numerous other surgeries Several
`
`technical
`
`had
`
`patients
`
`cages
`
`as
`
`Table
`
`primary surgery
`lists each patient
`VSP fixation
`
`date of surgery surgeon
`cage
`levels PLIF levels
`carbon cage
`material
`levels
`done with ETO-sterilized bone 6- 12- and 24-month clinical
`for carbon cages and ETO PLIF levels
`are graded
`regarding reoperation Clinical
`
`status fusion status
`
`information
`
`and
`
`results
`
`fair or poor
`good
`excellent
`criteria summarized in Table
`
`according
`
`to generally
`
`accepted
`
`Radiographic
`
`evidence
`
`of
`
`fusion was
`to
`graded
`obvious
`pseudarthrosis
`radiographically solid by criteria summarized in Table
`
`fusion
`
`Results
`
`32
`there were 63 total
`fusion levels
`fusions 29 with the
`larger oval cage used
`and with
`had ETO donor bone PLIFs and 20
`fusion using autologous bone
`had posterolateral
`with pedicle screw and plate support without
`fusion Two-year
`on 31 cage
`There were no failed
`
`In the 26 patients
`
`levels
`
`had
`
`carbon
`
`PLIF cage
`anteriorly 11 levels
`
`Figure
`
`levels
`
`cage
`
`interbody
`
`follow-up
`
`roentgenograms
`
`tained
`
`patients
`
`levels
`
`and
`
`interbody
`were ob
`in 25
`
`11 allograft
`fusions with the carbon
`
`levels
`
`cage Successful
`
`radiographic
`
`fusion was achieved
`
`in 28
`
`BR0002961
`
`ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC., ALPHATEC SPINE INC. v. NUVASIVE INC.
`IPR2019-00362, Ex. 1055, p. 3 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 3:08-cv-01512-CAB-MDD Document 407-6 Filed 10/27/11 PageID.19262 Page 4 of 13
`
`2108
`
`Spine
`
`Volume 18 Number 14
`
`1993
`
`N-
`
`Table
`
`Outcome
`
`Summaries for
`
`lnterboy_EusiJsing
`
`Carbon Cages
`
`Number
`
`Date
`
`of
`
`Prior
`
`Surg
`
`Cage
`
`Surgical
`
`Surgery
`
`Indication
`
`Surgeon
`
`Cage
`
`Material
`
`Cage
`
`Levels
`
`ETO
`Levels Mo
`
`12
`Mo
`
`24
`Mo
`
`ETO
`
`Cage
`
`Fusion
`
`Fusion
`
`Re-op
`Y/N
`
`Purpose
`
`of Re-op
`
`Clinical
`
`Status
`
`5/09/89
`
`Failed
`
`ETO
`
`PLIF
`
`7/21/89
`
`Failed
`
`ETO
`
`PLIF
`
`1/02/91
`
`Failed
`
`ETO
`
`PLIF
`
`Instability
`
`Instability
`
`8/08/89
`
`8/09/89
`
`8/11/89
`
`ADS
`
`ADS
`
`JWB
`
`JWB
`ADS
`
`L4-S1
`
`L4-S1
`
`none
`
`L4-S1
`
`L4-L5
`
`L5-S1
`
`L4-S1
`
`L5-S1
`
`none
`
`L4-S1
`
`L3-S1
`
`L4-L5
`
`L3-L4
`
`none
`
`L4-L5
`
`L4-S1
`
`L4-L5
`
`PEEK
`
`PEEK
`
`PEEK
`
`Failed
`
`ETO
`
`PLIF L5
`
`Remove
`
`plate
`
`Patient
`
`AP
`
`LD
`GMP
`
`BA
`
`PR
`
`MSC
`IWT
`
`SRD
`MK
`
`MS
`JB
`
`MJD
`
`FA
`
`ADS
`
`ADS
`
`ADS
`ADS
`
`ADS
`
`ADS
`
`ADS
`
`ADS
`
`Spondylo
`
`below
`
`HRI
`
`10/11/89
`
`Failed
`
`ALIF
`
`12/05/89
`
`Failed
`
`PLIF
`
`12/11/89
`
`Gr
`
`Ill Spondylo
`
`1/05/90
`
`1/08/90
`
`1/15/90
`
`1/19/90
`
`Failed
`
`PLIF
`
`Stenosis at
`
`fusion
`
`Spondylo
`
`Dislocation
`
`L5-S1
`
`i/i 9/90
`
`D-Spondylo
`
`1/31/90
`
`Failed
`
`PLIF
`
`none
`
`L2-S1
`
`L3-L4
`
`L2-L3
`
`L5-Si
`
`L4-Si
`
`L2-S1
`
`L4-S1
`
`L2-S1
`
`L4-S1
`
`L5-S1
`
`L5-S1
`
`L4-L5
`
`L5-S1
`
`L2-L3
`
`L5-S1
`
`none
`
`none
`
`L2-L4
`
`none
`
`L4-L5
`
`none
`
`L4-S1
`
`L4-S1
`
`L5-Si
`
`L5-S1
`
`L4-L5
`
`none
`
`PEEK
`
`PEEK
`
`PEEK
`
`PEEK
`
`PEEK
`
`PEEK
`
`PEEK
`
`PEEK
`
`PEEK
`
`Repair
`
`burst
`
`fx
`
`Remove
`
`vSP
`
`Myelo
`
`graphic
`
`block
`
`EEH
`
`HF
`
`RJL
`
`MP
`
`LH
`
`DER
`
`AG
`DEL
`
`SED
`
`DDD
`
`ADS
`ADS
`ADS
`ADS
`
`ADS
`
`RSB
`
`RSB
`
`ADS
`
`ADS
`ADS
`JWB
`
`2/21/90
`
`3/07/90
`
`3/07/90
`
`3/13/90
`
`3/14/90
`
`L-Spondylo
`
`D-Spondylo
`
`Post-
`
`discectomy
`
`Failed
`
`Perk
`
`Post
`
`discectomy
`
`3/19/90
`
`Failed
`
`chymo-
`
`3/19/90
`
`3/30/90
`
`4/18/90
`
`papain
`
`D-Spondylo
`
`Failed
`
`Zielke
`
`Post-
`
`discectomy
`
`4/25/90
`
`D-Spondylo
`
`7/09/90
`
`Failed
`
`PLIF
`
`PEEK
`PEEK
`
`PEEK
`
`PEEK
`
`PEEK
`
`PEEK
`
`PEEK
`
`PEEK
`
`PEEK
`
`PEEK
`
`L4-S1
`
`L4-L5
`
`L4-S1
`
`None
`
`None
`
`L5-Si
`
`L4-L5
`
`L4-S1
`
`L5-S1
`
`L5-S1
`
`L4-L5
`
`none
`
`none
`
`none
`
`none
`
`L4-S1
`
`L5-S1
`
`L4-L5
`
`L2-L5
`
`L2-L1
`
`L3-S1
`
`none
`
`T12-S1
`
`L3-L4
`
`L4-L5
`
`L3-Si
`
`L4-L5
`
`L5-Si
`
`L4-L5
`
`L3L5
`
`none
`
`none
`
`none
`
`DC
`JC
`
`7/09/90
`
`Burst
`
`fx Li
`
`JWB
`ADS
`JWB
`
`UPEK
`
`none
`
`T12-L2
`
`none
`
`lndicates
`
`anterior
`
`interbody
`
`fusion with
`
`large oval
`
`cage
`
`Clinical
`
`result
`
`excellent
`
`good
`
`fair
`
`poor
`
`Cage material
`
`PEEK
`
`carbon
`
`fiber in PEEK UPEK
`
`carbon
`
`fiber in Ultrapek
`
`-e-J3
`
`1j.j.jJ
`
`.4
`
`Fusion
`
`result
`
`collapse
`
`of construct
`
`probable
`
`pseudarthrosis
`
`fusion
`
`status radiographically
`
`uncertain
`
`probable
`
`radiogra
`
`hic fusion
`
`radioaraphic
`
`fusion
`
`Surgeon
`
`ADS
`
`Arthur
`
`Steffee
`
`JWB
`
`John
`
`Brantigan
`
`RSB
`
`Robert
`
`Biscup
`
`of 28 100% followed levels
`In the same patients PLIF with ETO-sterilized
`PLIF cage
`bone
`achieved
`donor
`54.5% The difference
`0.0002
`the
`
`treated with the rectangular
`
`radiographic
`
`fusion
`
`in 6/11
`
`in fusion rates is significant at
`
`In seven
`by the chi-square
`test
`patients the carbon cage was used to treat pseudarthrosis
`ETO donor
`PLIF or ALIF In one
`from failed
`bone
`
`level
`
`patient we could not obtain
`follow-up roentgenogram
`The other six failed PLIFs treated with the carbon cage
`fusion
`resulted in successful
`
`Clinical
`
`results
`
`at
`
`and
`
`in Table
`
`At
`
`years are given
`10/26 good
`years 10/26 patients were excellent
`3/26 fair and 2/26 poor clinical
`results Results improved
`during the second
`year At 24
`
`slightly
`
`postoperative
`
`months one patient was lost
`at previous examination
`
`excellent
`
`to follow-up but had been
`
`Of
`
`clinical
`
`results
`
`each
`
`had
`
`burst
`
`including
`
`the poor
`clearly
`to the carbon
`demonstrable reason for failure unrelated
`fracture at Li She
`cage Patient PR originally had
`had four prior procedures by other surgeons
`fusions at L4S and L5Si using bovine bone
`interbody
`fifth surgery by A.D.S to repair the two-level
`She had
`failed ALIF This surgery
`included
`resection
`of pedicles
`of L4 and L5
`at L5 osteotomy at L5 joining the bodies
`fusion at L34 and
`an ETO
`carbon cage
`at L23 At
`follow-up she
`fusion
`allograft
`interbody
`continued to have back pain her allograft PLIF level was
`long fusion ended
`two cephalad
`not healed and her
`
`interbody
`
`at
`
`BR0002962
`
`ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC., ALPHATEC SPINE INC. v. NUVASIVE INC.
`IPR2019-00362, Ex. 1055, p. 4 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 3:08-cv-01512-CAB-MDD Document 407-6 Filed 10/27/11 PageID.19263 Page 5 of 13
`
`Carbon Implant
`
`for PLIF
`
`Brantigan and Steffee
`
`2109
`
`Table
`
`Description
`
`of Excellent Good Fair and Poor Surgical Results by Author
`
`Author
`
`Excellent
`
`Result
`
`Good Result
`
`Henderson
`
`1966
`
`Returns to former occupation
`
`no pain or minimal
`
`pain
`
`sports
`
`or
`
`recreational
`
`activities
`
`unrestricted
`
`Ma 1985
`
`Returns to original
`
`work
`
`regular
`
`activites
`
`minimal medication
`
`occasional episodes of pain
`
`no neuro deficits
`
`fusion
`
`solid
`
`by X-ray
`
`Returns to former occupation
`
`occasional
`
`pain
`
`not per
`
`sisting more than 12 hours
`
`not
`
`restricted
`
`from less
`
`strenuous
`
`sports
`
`Returns to original
`occasional medication
`
`work
`
`resumes
`
`regular
`
`activities
`
`takes
`
`for episodes
`
`of back or
`
`leg pain
`
`no neuro deficits
`
`radiographic
`
`solid
`
`or questionable
`
`Naylor
`
`1974
`
`No complaints
`
`whatsoever
`
`and
`
`no residual
`
`ill effects
`
`fusion
`
`Relief
`
`of
`
`residual
`
`minor
`
`the major symptom of pain but with minor
`as numbness
`such
`
`paresthesias
`
`symtpoms
`backache
`
`to
`
`Spengler
`
`1990
`
`no excellent
`
`category
`
`acknowledged
`
`Relief
`
`of most
`
`76-100%
`previous work minimal
`
`of back pain able to return
`minimal
`
`of activities
`
`limitation
`
`White 1987
`
`Complete
`
`recovery
`
`free
`
`of
`
`all
`
`limitations
`
`never
`
`have
`
`pain greater
`
`Return to full
`
`activities
`
`medications
`
`the same job or prophylactic
`sports
`no daily
`70% relief of pain
`
`than mild pain patient
`
`aware
`
`of but not bothered
`
`by
`
`limitation
`
`to light work
`
`Prolo
`
`1986
`
`No pain or minimal
`
`and work
`
`score
`
`pain able to
`or 10
`
`participate
`
`in full
`
`activities
`
`Fair Result
`
`habituating
`Mild pain with some strenuous activities
`
`medications
`
`limited
`
`by
`
`pain
`
`Score
`
`or
`
`Poor
`
`Result
`
`Henderson
`
`1966
`
`Restricted
`
`Ma 1985
`
`restricted
`
`Returns to original
`
`or
`
`and
`
`recreational
`
`activities
`
`Unable
`
`to work
`
`pain level
`
`no better
`
`than pre-operatively
`
`problem
`
`of activities
`
`Changes
`
`to lighter work
`
`or disabled
`
`limitation
`
`of activities
`
`to lighter work
`sports
`less pain the pre-op but pain still
`some limitation
`lighter work
`more frequent
`
`back
`
`or
`
`occasional medication
`
`leg pain minor
`
`Naylor
`
`1974
`
`Improved relief
`
`of
`
`the major pain symptom but with residual
`
`neuro
`
`deficit
`
`fusion
`
`questionable
`
`or pseudarthrosis
`
`frequent medication
`by XR
`
`pseudarthrosis
`
`failure no relief
`
`incapacitating
`
`pain or neuro
`
`deficit
`
`Spengler
`
`1990
`
`Partial
`
`or
`
`requiring
`to previous work
`limited meds used
`
`further
`
`treatment
`
`Little
`
`or no relief 0-25% of pain disabled for work
`or narcotic
`
`activities
`
`greatly
`
`limited strong analgesic
`
`numbness
`paresthesias
`relief of pain 26-75% able to return
`with limitations
`lighter work
`
`or backache
`
`activities
`
`White 1987
`
`Patient
`
`able to work
`
`but at
`
`lighter
`
`capacity
`
`less
`
`frequently
`
`than 70% pain
`
`No improvement
`
`or worsening
`
`25% or
`
`less
`
`subjective
`
`medication
`
`used
`
`frequently
`
`Prolo
`
`1986
`
`Moderate
`
`continuing
`
`some limitation
`
`relief
`
`or daily
`
`activities
`
`limited occasional
`pain meds
`
`episodes of severe pain
`
`relief
`
`of pain episodes
`
`of severe pain disability
`
`or
`
`reoperation
`No improvement
`
`of
`
`all
`
`activities
`
`or
`
`of non-strenuous
`
`pain with severe episodes
`Score
`
`or
`
`activities
`
`limitation
`
`of pain disability marked
`or worsening
`Score
`
`damaged disc levels
`She
`
`subsequently
`
`Clinical expectations
`
`related to an old burst
`
`fracture at Li
`
`several
`further
`had
`has
`surgeries
`for her are limited Patient DEL has
`of an ETO PLIF level at
`
`but has failure
`
`There were no cage
`no prolongation of hospitalization
`no removals of the cage or
`fusion No retropulsion
`cage was noted
`
`device-related
`
`complications
`
`revisions
`
`of
`
`the cage
`
`interbody
`
`or change
`
`in position
`
`of any
`
`in any
`
`level
`
`the
`
`leg
`he
`
`clinical
`
`improvement
`
`from
`
`level
`
`good
`
`clinical
`
`reoperations
`
`patient
`within
`the
`in 5/26 patients
`Reoperations were done
`In Patient EC failed ETO PLIF
`1224-month interval
`carbon cage Patient GMP had
`revised to
`was further
`removal of one VSP plate then pyriformis tendon release
`year she had some
`because of residual nerve pain At
`nerve discomfort but still
`had
`good
`residual
`summa
`result Patient PR had
`series of
`rized in the clinical summary Patient MK had removal of
`fragment of bone
`VSP and nerve root
`foramenotomy
`fusion was found to be compro
`from the posterolateral
`foramen at the L5 root Patient JB was
`mising the neural
`for myelographic block at L45 one level
`re-explored
`than the L5S1 cage
`fusion She had been treated
`at L5 Si and was
`traumatic
`dislocation
`in anatomic
`fusion solidly healed
`have the cage
`above
`the fusion In retro
`but had bony arachnoiditis
`cage myelogram showed the bony
`spect her preoperative
`result was substantially im
`Her clinical
`arachnoiditis
`
`higher
`
`for
`
`found to
`
`position
`
`poor result
`above
`
`L3
`
`the carbon cage
`results Patient MSC has collapse of
`Of the fair
`fusion Patient MK was
`L45 disc
`above
`the cage
`working full-time at 12 months
`teacher
`high school
`as
`He stopped work because of
`coach
`and wrestling
`symptoms of reflex sympathetic dystrophy however
`plays golf twice week His 24-month
`status was
`Fair Patient LH claims minimal
`is high examination is benign
`surgery but function
`fusion He is
`illiterate and
`shows
`
`roentgenogram
`and social dysfunction
`
`alcoholic
`
`may be
`
`significant
`
`in his result
`
`factor
`Complications were minimal There were no surgical
`numbness
`One patient
`had
`infections
`caused by damage
`to sensory
`There were no cases of motor deficit
`no cauda equina syndromes
`tears occurred in several patients
`dural
`
`postoperative
`of one nerve root
`
`fibers
`
`Incidental
`
`in these
`
`cases and
`
`durotomy
`however
`
`i.e
`
`there
`
`were
`
`no
`
`cases
`
`of
`
`postoperative
`
`cerebrospinal
`
`fluid
`
`leakage
`
`no requirement
`
`for secondary
`
`dural
`
`repair
`
`and
`
`proved by her surgery
`
`BR0002963
`
`ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC., ALPHATEC SPINE INC. v. NUVASIVE INC.
`IPR2019-00362, Ex. 1055, p. 5 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 3:08-cv-01512-CAB-MDD Document 407-6 Filed 10/27/11 PageID.19264 Page 6 of 13
`
`2110
`
`Spine
`
`Volume 18 Number 14
`
`1993
`
`Table
`
`Description
`
`of Fusion Result
`
`Obvious
`
`small
`
`lucency
`
`of
`
`the construct
`
`loss of disc height vertebral shp broken screws
`
`of
`
`graft
`
`of
`
`or major lucency or gap visible in the
`
`just
`bone
`
`portion
`
`of
`
`area at approximately the density
`the fusion
`area with
`
`least half of
`
`originally achieved
`
`the graft area showing
`
`surgically
`no
`
`at
`
`on collapse
`radiographic pseudarthrosis based
`displacement
`the bone
`of the carbon cage or
`resorption
`Probable radiographic
`the bone graft
`on significant
`pseudarthrosis based
`resorption
`mm or more around the entire periphery of
`fusion
`the graft or cage
`area
`uncertain Bone graft
`status
`is visible in the fusion
`Radiographic
`lucency or gap may be visible involving
`between
`and vertebral
`the graft bone
`Probable radiographic fusion Bone
`should be no lucency
`Radiographic
`fusion The bone
`surgery Optimally there
`graft and vertebral
`bone
`
`between
`
`bridges
`the donor
`
`the entire fusion
`
`bone
`
`and vertebral
`
`area with
`bone
`
`at
`
`least
`
`the density
`
`originally achieved
`
`at surgery There
`
`in the fusion
`
`area
`
`is no interface
`
`between
`
`indicates
`
`fusion Other
`
`signs
`
`is radiographically
`the donor
`bone
`
`and more mature than originally achieved
`more dense
`and the vertebral bone
`however
`line between
`sclerotic
`include mature bony
`of solid fusion
`trabeculae
`the graft within the disc
`
`in
`
`the
`
`bridging
`
`fusion
`
`the fusion
`
`area
`
`of facet
`
`joints the
`
`of anterior
`resorption
`ring phenomenon
`
`spurs anterior progression of
`vertebral
`traction
`on CT or 3D imaging evidence
`
`space
`
`Case Reports
`
`Table
`
`Clinical Results at 12 and 24 Months
`
`Excellent
`
`Good
`
`Fair
`
`Poor
`
`Lost
`
`l2Months
`
`10
`
`24 Months
`10
`_______________________________________________
`
`11
`
`Case
`Patient AP was
`the time of his
`man at
`54-year-old
`had
`been
`carbon
`surgery His first surgery
`at L4L5 in 1987 He
`and disc excision
`of back
`and right leg pain
`In January 1988 he
`
`experienced early recurrence
`with some right-sided weakness
`
`cage
`
`laminectomy
`
`Figure
`
`Lateral
`
`roentgenogram
`
`on Patient
`
`AP taken
`
`January
`
`allograft
`
`bone
`
`shows
`
`good
`
`restoration
`
`of
`
`disc
`
`height
`
`and
`
`1988
`
`shows
`
`postdiscectomy
`
`segmental
`
`instability
`
`placement
`
`of grafts
`
`Figure
`
`1988
`
`Up-angled
`
`anteroposterior
`
`view taken
`
`February
`
`25
`
`month
`
`after surgery
`
`2-level
`
`PLIF
`
`using
`
`ETO-sterilized
`
`BR0002964
`
`ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC., ALPHATEC SPINE INC. v. NUVASIVE INC.
`IPR2019-00362, Ex. 1055, p. 6 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 3:08-cv-01512-CAB-MDD Document 407-6 Filed 10/27/11 PageID.19265 Page 7 of 13
`
`Carbon Implant
`
`for PLIF
`
`Brantigan and Steffee
`
`2111
`
`complained
`
`of marked
`
`severe
`
`tolerance
`
`of
`
`limitation of activity
`continuous moderate
`pain and
`frequent
`episodes
`shown in Figure
`pain The roentgenogram
`slip at L4S with
`demonstrated an unstable degenerative
`mild slip was also noted
`loss of disc height
`complete
`at L5S1
`On January 25 1988 he
`reduction
`of disc height
`including
`
`had
`
`second
`
`surgery
`
`reduction
`
`of
`
`the
`
`fixation
`segmental
`spondylolisthesis
`screws and VSP plates with two-level
`
`using
`pedicle
`PLIF using ETO
`
`allograft
`
`Roentgenograms
`shown in Figures
`he complained
`
`taken
`
`and
`
`of decreasing
`
`pain By February
`
`procedure Figures
`
`1989
`and
`
`are
`
`activity
`
`on February 25 1988
`After initial satisfactory results
`level and increasing
`his ETO PLIF
`
`year after
`show that all
`
`four grafts have
`have broken the slip has
`lost He
`
`height
`
`was
`
`again
`
`collapsed five of six screws
`and
`
`disc
`
`space
`
`recurred
`
`urgently
`requested
`On May
`1989 the patient
`removal of broken
`including
`ration of alignment and disc
`and revision
`height
`at L45 and L5S1 During his
`PLIF using carbon cages
`visit on July 20 1989 he reported moderate daily
`
`further
`
`treatment
`
`had
`
`screws
`
`space
`
`further surgery
`resto
`and plates
`
`office
`
`If
`
`Anteroposterior
`
`roentgenogram
`
`taken
`
`February
`
`year after surgery allograft
`screws are broken
`
`PLIF
`
`has collapsed several
`
`shows
`
`that
`
`the allograft
`
`and the disc
`
`height
`
`is
`
`Figure
`
`1989
`
`lost
`
`activity and
`
`roent
`
`visit
`
`no pain Two-month postoperative
`are shown in Figures
`and
`genograms
`On October 17 1989 the patient
`reported absolutely
`to work as
`no pain at all and returned
`radio dispatcher
`for Columbia Gas of Ohio On his 1-year follow-up
`no pain he was working
`on June 19 1990 he reported
`to normal
`full-time and motor strength
`had
`returned
`12 show solid
`in Figures 10 11 and
`both interspace
`levels
`are no
`bridging
`intact Alignment and disc
`broken screws
`Implants are all
`height are normal He has continued to have an excellent
`
`Roentgenograms
`bone
`
`There
`
`result at
`years after
`surgery Two-year
`genogram is shown in Figure 13
`
`lateral
`
`roent
`
`had
`
`pain
`
`that
`
`the time of her
`
`she
`
`con
`
`limitation of
`
`fall causing
`
`Case
`Patient LD was
`56-year-old woman at
`carbon cage surgery She had had
`fusion
`posterolateral
`at L5S1 with facet screw fixation In 1970
`in 1968
`discectomy at L45 followed by constant
`caused chronic
`tinuing back
`activities In June 1989 she was injured in
`back
`and
`increased
`radicular pain Roentgenograms
`at L45 The poster-
`
`Figure
`
`Lateral
`
`good
`
`correction
`
`roentgenogram taken
`of spondylolisthesis
`
`February 25 1988 shows
`
`showed Grade
`
`spondylolisthesis
`
`BR0002965
`
`ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC., ALPHATEC SPINE INC. v. NUVASIVE INC.
`IPR2019-00362, Ex. 1055, p. 7 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 3:08-cv-01512-CAB-MDD Document 407-6 Filed 10/27/11 PageID.19266 Page 8 of 13
`Volume 18 Number 14 1993
`
`2112
`
`Spine
`
`olateral
`
`fusion appeared radiographically
`
`intact After
`
`she had
`conservative
`of
`period
`by
`treatment
`surgery
`J.W.B The surgical plan was segmental stabilization with
`and VSP plates with PLIF using allograft
`pedicle screws
`donor bone The small pedicle at L4 on the right was
`donor
`bone
`during screw insertion Available
`fractured
`was soft and mechanically
`insufficient The posterolateral
`at L5S1 was not united Permission then was
`fusion
`from the family to use the carbon cages which
`had not been
`The surgical
`anticipated
`preoperatively
`PLIF at L45 pedicle
`carbon cages
`included
`construct
`screw fixation at L4S1 on the left and L5S1 on the
`right with autologous posterolateral
`bone grafting bilat
`
`obtained
`
`erally
`
`the patient experienced early relief of
`Postoperatively
`both leg and back pain She returned
`to work less than
`months
`family business
`to
`surgery
`maintaining mobile homes At
`years after surgery
`reported mild residual heaviness in her
`but
`walking distances
`no
`limitation Her 2-year
`roentgenograms
`and 15 Continuous
`bone
`14
`
`after
`
`reported
`
`selling
`
`and
`
`she
`
`left
`
`leg after
`
`or
`
`pain
`activity
`are shown in
`the in
`
`Figures
`
`bridges
`area She demonstrates classic
`terbody fusion
`successful PLIF including
`
`continuous
`
`signs of
`bone
`
`trabecular
`
`Figure
`
`Lateral
`
`loss of disc
`
`height
`
`roentgenogram
`and recurrence
`
`taken
`
`February
`of slip deformity
`
`1989 shows
`
`Figure
`
`20 1989
`
`implants
`
`Up-angled
`anteroposterior
`roentgenogram
`months after surgery revision
`shows
`the cage PLIF
`of
`
`early appearance
`
`PLIF with
`
`taken
`
`July
`
`the carbon
`
`fusion area There is extension
`the interbody
`bridging
`the disc space She demonstrates
`bone graft throughout
`bone with vertebral
`cortical continuity
`of the interspace
`Her son
`bone
`above
`and
`below the interspace
`cage PLIF included
`three-level
`
`of
`
`in this
`
`body
`
`subsequently
`
`had
`
`report
`
`11 Discussion
`
`Results in lumbar fusion surgery are usually evaluated
`determining rate of clinical
`and
`success
`rate of
`fusion
`
`by
`
`success
`
`Although
`
`there
`
`definitions
`
`results
`
`as
`
`of excellent
`summarized
`
`are some
`variations
`in the
`good fair and poor surgical
`in Table
`the parameters
`
`addressed
`
`include
`
`status
`
`activity
`
`pain
`occupational
`level and use of medication.141920212426
`We have compared
`the literature Reports of surgical
`treatment
`shown an
`discectomies11216723253 have
`success of 66.5% and an average
`fusion success of
`85.1% Reports of
`by number of
`lev
`fusion
`success
`have shown an average
`fusion success of 90.0%
`els61322
`attempts 77.2% with two-level
`at one-level
`attempts
`and 65.4% with three-level attempts Our surgical
`
`our results with other
`
`clinical
`
`reports
`
`in
`
`of
`
`failed
`
`average
`
`results
`
`BR0002966
`
`ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC., ALPHATEC SPINE INC. v. NUVASIVE INC.
`IPR2019-00362, Ex. 1055, p. 8 of 13
`
`

`

`Case 3:08-cv-01512-CAB-MDD Document 407-6 Filed 10/27/11 PageID.19267 Page 9 of 13
`
`Carbon Implant
`
`for PLIF
`
`Brantigan and Steffee
`
`2113
`
`or
`success
`interpreting
`The ETO allograft pseudarthrosis
`clearly evidenced
`
`by crushing
`
`failure
`
`of
`
`collapse
`
`of
`
`the surgical
`
`construct
`
`and
`
`in Figures
`the PLIF graft and
`by broken
`indicated
`
`is
`
`of
`
`radiographic
`
`fusion
`
`screws
`
`and
`
`vertebral
`
`displacement Cage
`
`fusions
`
`have
`
`the highest
`consistently met
`descriptive
`example the successful carbon cage
`and 12 is indicated
`bone bridging
`by mature trabecular
`interspaces with no lucencies in the fusion
`the vertebral
`The numeric format will
`in database
`be useful
`
`category For
`fusion in Figures 11
`
`areas
`
`comparisons
`
`of
`
`that
`
`larger patient study groups
`fusion both for
`Interpretation of successful
`interbody
`donor bone and for the carbon composite cages requires
`be parallel
`to the endplates Any
`the
`x-ray projection
`the interface
`view of
`obscures
`the essential
`
`plane Figure
`
`obliquity
`between graft and vertebra This is particularly true in the
`straight AP view in
`10 shows
`coronal
`to either L45 or
`is not parallel
`which
`the projection
`L5S1 These
`appear somewhat amorphous
`interspaces
`The up-angled projection
`in Figure 11
`to the
`is parallel
`L45 interspace and clearly shows
`detail not apparent in
`
`Figure
`
`restoration
`
`cage PLIF
`
`Lateral
`
`of disc height
`
`July 20
`roentgenogram
`and alignment with early appearance
`
`taken
`
`1989
`
`shows
`
`of
`
`favorable when compared with these previous
`appear
`reports Exact
`however
`comparisons
`because most of our patients
`backs
`causes Certainly the results
`of varying
`
`difficult
`
`failed
`
`are postsurgical
`
`are
`
`statistical
`
`are
`
`favorable
`
`to warrant
`
`multicentered
`
`pro
`into prog
`and
`inclusion
`
`are divided
`
`specific
`
`sufficiently
`spective study in which patients
`groups by
`and randomized
`
`nostically
`
`distinct
`
`exclusion
`
`criteria
`
`treatment
`to different
`by the Food
`study has been approved
`and Drug Administration and has been initiated
`have
`been
`Pseudarthrosis
`studied
`long
`been done During this century
`fusion
`surgeries
`most authors have agreed that
`the quoted fusion statistics
`of normal
`by uncertainties
`are flawed
`radiographic
`of determining fusion Authors who have used
`more precise methods
`fusion have reported
`of assessing
`rate as compared with authors
`twice the pseudarthrosis
`From Hibbs in 192915
`to
`using less precise criteria.82533
`in 1991 many authors
`in 197429
`Thompson
`have
`differ
`stated that only direct surgical exploration
`entiates fusion and pseudarthrosis
`We have outlined
`standard
`Table
`and
`have defined
`
`methods Such
`
`methods
`
`rates
`
`have
`
`as
`
`as
`
`to Brodsky
`
`radiographic
`
`criteria
`
`in
`
`5-point
`
`numeric scale for
`
`June
`19 1990
`10 Anteroposterior
`roentgenogram taken
`Figure
`not show the cages
`does
`year after surgery carbon cage
`PLIF
`does
`the
`the
`not parallel
`interbody graft because
`
`projection
`
`or
`
`disc
`
`space
`
`BR0002967
`
`ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC., ALPHATEC SPINE INC. v. NUVASIVE INC.
`IPR2019-00362, Ex. 1055, p. 9 of 13
`
`

`

`Figure
`
`cages
`
`as
`
`the details of the
`
`autograft
`bone
`
`view in
`
`the
`
`density
`
`postoperative
`cages are indistinct
`because
`have approximately the same radiographic
`the cancellous
`In Figure 11 at
`year after
`has become relatively more
`is now relatively
`the
`of
`
`Case 3:08-cv-01512-CAB-MDD Document 407-6 Filed 10/27/11 PageID.19268 Page 10 of
` 13
`Volume 18 Number 14
`
`2114
`
`Spine
`
`1993
`
`Relative radiodensities
`
`the straight AP view Optimum visualization of L5S1
`would require
`angle
`greater projection
`of carbon composite and bone
`provide an interesting index of arthrodesis
`for the cage
`PLIF The carbon
`not
`
`is
`
`radiolucent
`
`radiotransparent
`
`composite cage
`In the 2-month
`
`surgery the autograft
`dense in the interspace
`more lucent showing
`sign of maturing arthrodesis
`of 31/31 or 100% apparent successful
`using the several
`
`and
`
`cage
`
`the visible
`
`rectangular
`
`pattern
`
`configurations
`
`of
`
`struts
`
`as
`
`cage
`Our experience
`fusion
`
`interbody
`carbon
`
`is
`
`in surgical
`improvement
`cage
`significant
`for the PLIF procedure as compared with donor
`bone The fusion
`54.5% with
`rate of
`ETO-sterilized
`is typical of our experience
`allograft
`PLIF procedures in patients with this degree
`The fusion
`rate is also consistent
`complexity
`with the results
`
`results
`
`success
`
`6/11
`
`in
`
`of clinical
`
`success
`
`fusions
`
`goats
`
`of our histologic
`in goats In
`
`killed at
`
`study of
`interbody
`have
`year we
`
`Figure
`
`12 Lateral
`
`mature healed PLIF with
`
`roentgenogram
`the carbon cages
`
`taken
`
`June
`
`19 1990
`
`shows
`
`achieved 100% fusion with the carbon cages and 67%
`fusion with the ETO-ster

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket