throbber

`Paper No. 6
`Filed: Mar. 26, 2019
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________
`
`
`APPLE, INC.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`UUSI, LLC dba NARTRON
`
`Patent Owner
`
`____________________
`
`
`Cases IPR2019-00355; IPR2019-00356; IPR2019-00357; IPR2019-
`00358; IPR2019-00359; and IPR2019-00360
`
`Patent No. 5,796,183
`
`____________________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER'S MOTION FOR
`PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF LAWRENCE M. HADLEY
`
`1579445
`
`
`2909009
`
`

`

`Case IPR2019-00359
`
`Patent No. 5,796,183
`
`EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit Description
`
`Declaration of Lawrence M. Hadley in support of patent owner’s
`
`EX. #
`
`UUSIZOO l
`
`motion for pro hac vice admission
`
`2909009
`
`

`

`
`
`Case IPR2019-00359
`Patent No. 5,796,183
`
`Patent Owner UUSI, LLC d/b/a/ Nartron (“UUSI” or “Patent Owner”)
`respectfully requests that the Board recognize and admit Lawrence M. Hadley as
`counsel pro hac vice to represent UUSI during the above-captioned proceeding.
`This motion is authorized by the Notice of Filing Date that was mailed on February
`5, 2019. The bases and support for UUSI’s requests are as follows.
`I.
`TIMING OF UUSI'S REQUEST.
`UUSI’s motion is being filed no sooner than twenty-one (21) days after the
`service of the petition.
`II. GOOD CAUSE BASIS FOR UUSI'S REQUEST.
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a
`showing of good cause, subject to the condition that lead counsel is a registered
`practitioner and a declaration of the party seeking admission is included with the
`Request. 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c). Good cause has been shown where, for example,
`the attorney for which pro hac vice admission is sought is an experienced patent
`litigator and has a familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding, and
`the admission of the party’s counsel will facilitate the party’s ability to effectively
`participate in the proceeding. UUSI respectfully submits that all of these conditions
`have been met here.
`UUSI’s lead counsel, Joseph A. Rhoa, is a registered practitioner. See
`Exhibit 2001, Declaration of Lawrence M. Hadley in Support of Motion for
`Admission Pro Hac Vice (“Hadley Decl.”), at ¶ 14.
`As demonstrated by his declaration, Mr. Hadley is an experienced litigator
`who has litigated patent infringement cases for various parties in federal district
`courts throughout the United States, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
`Circuit, and the International Trade Commission. Id. at ¶ 5. His legal career spans
`over twenty-five (25) years. See id. at ¶ 3. Mr. Hadley has extensive experience in
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`2909009
`
`

`

`
`
`Case IPR2019-00359
`Patent No. 5,796,183
`
`litigating patent infringement cases, and has served as lead counsel in numerous
`patent infringement cases. Id. at ¶ 5.
`Mr. Hadley is familiar with the subject matter of this proceeding. He is lead
`trial counsel for UUSI in the underlying district court action against Apple
`involving U.S. Pat. No. 5,796,183 (the “’183 Patent”), UUSI, LLC, d/b/a Nartron
`v. Apple Inc., Civ. Action No. 18-cv-04637- JD (N.D. Cal.). Id. at ¶ 6.
`Additionally, Mr. Hadley is lead trial counsel for UUSI in a district court action
`against Samsung involving the ’183 Patent, UUSI, LLC, d/b/a Nartron v. Samsung
`Electronics Co., Ltd., Civ. Action No. 1:15-cv-00146-JTN (W.D. Mich.). Id.
`Finally, Mr. Hadley is lead appellate counsel for UUSI in Samsung’s Federal
`Circuit appeal of the recently-concluded IPR filed by Samsung, which found that
`Samsung had not met its burden of proving the challenged claims of the ’183
`patent invalid as obvious. Samsung v. UUSI, LLC d/b/a/ Nartron, AIA Review
`No. IPR2016- 00908, Final Written Decision dated Oct. 18, 2017, appealed in
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. UUSI, LLC, No. 2018-1310, pending at the
`Federal Circuit. Id.
`During the course of these actions, Mr. Hadley has become highly familiar
`with the invention claimed in the ’183 Patent, the technology relevant to the ’183
`patent, the prosecution history of the ’183 patent, including the two reexamination
`proceedings, the prior art to the ’183 patent, including the prior art asserted in the
`six new IPRs filed by Apple, the prior Samsung IPR challenge to the same claims
`of the ’183 patent at issue in these new IPRs, the Board’s Final Written Decision in
`that IPR, and the arguments concerning the validity of the patent made by
`petitioner. Id. at ¶ 7.
`UUSI submits that Mr. Hadley’s participation will assist it and its lead
`counsel in effectively participating in this proceeding, and will facilitate timely
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`2909009
`
`

`

`
`
`Case IPR2019-00359
`Patent No. 5,796,183
`
`completion of the proceedings.
`Mr. Hadley has never been suspended, disbarred, sanctioned or cited for
`contempt by any court or administrative body, and has never had an application for
`admission to practice before a court or agency denied. Id. at ¶¶ 8-9. Mr. Hadley is
`a member in good standing of the Bar of California, the United States Supreme
`Court, the Ninth and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal, and numerous district
`courts across the country. Id. at ¶ 4. Mr. Hadley has further agreed, as indicated in
`his declaration, to read and to be subject to the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide,
`the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R, and the
`USPTO’s Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq.,
`and submit to disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a). Id. at ¶¶ 11.
`III. CONCLUSION.
`For the foregoing reasons, UUSI respectfully requests that the Board
`recognize Lawrence M. Hadley as its counsel, pro hac vice, in this proceeding.
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`By: /s/ Joseph A. Rhoa
` Joseph A. Rhoa
` Reg. No. 37,515
` Jonathan A. Roberts
` Reg. No. 68,565
`NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C.
`901 North Glebe Road, 11th Floor
`Arlington, VA 22203-1808
`Tel.: 703-816-4043
`Tel.: 703-816-4414
`Email: jar@nixonvan.com
`Email: jr@nixonvan.com
`
`3
`
`
`2909009
`
`
`
`Dated: March 26, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Case IPR2019-00359
`Patent No. 5,796,183
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true copy of the foregoing Patent Owner’s
`
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Lawrence M. Hadley and all exhibits filed
`
`therewith, was served on Petitioner Apple, Inc., on March 26, 2019, by emailing a
`
`copy to counsel at the email addresses listed below:
`
`W. Karl Renner, Reg. No. 41,265
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel: 202-783-5070
`Fax: 877-769-7945
`IPR39521-0062IP5@fr.com
`PTABInbound@fr.com
`Axf-ptab@fr.com
`monaldo@fr.com
`dsmith@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Joseph A. Rhoa
`Joseph A. Rhoa
`Reg. No. 37,515
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2909009
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket