`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 7
`Entered: April 3, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`APPLE, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`UUSI, LLC d/b/a NARTRON,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case No. IPR2019-00355; Case No. IPR2019-00356
`Case No. IPR2019-00357; Case No. IPR2019-00358
` Case No. IPR2019-00359; Case No. IPR2019-00360
` (Patent 5,796,183)1
`_____________
`
`Before BRYAN F. MOORE, MINN CHUNG, and
`NORMAN H. BEAMER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BEAMER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Patent Owner’s Motion for
`Pro Hac Vice Admission of Lawrence M. Hadley
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are the same in all identified cases. We
`exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. The
`parties, however, are not authorized to use this style heading in subsequent
`papers.
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00355; IPR2019-00356; IPR2019-00357;
`IPR2019-00358; IPR2019-00359; IPR2019-00360
`(Patent 5,796,183)
`
`
`On March 26, 2019, Patent Owner filed a Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission of Lawrence M. Hadley (Paper 6 (“Motion”))2 and, in support
`thereof, filed a Declaration of Mr. Hadley (Ex. 2001 (“Declaration”)).3 No
`oppositions have been filed.
`Having considered Patent Owner’s Motions and the Declarations, we
`conclude that Mr. Hadley has sufficient qualifications to represent Patent
`Owner in these proceedings and that Patent Owner has shown good cause
`for Mr. Hadley’s pro hac vice admission. See Unified Patents, Inc. v.
`Parallel Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (setting forth the
`requirements for pro hac vice admission) (Paper 7).
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s unopposed Motions for pro hac vice
`admission of Mr. Hadley are granted; Mr. Hadley is authorized to represent
`Patent Owner only as back-up counsel in these proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner must file, within seven (7)
`business days of the date of this order, a Power of Attorney for Mr. Hadley
`in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b);
`
`
`2 For convenience, this Order cites to the paper and exhibit filed in IPR2019-
`00355. Patent Owner filed similar Motions in IPR2019-00356 (Paper 6);
`IPR2019-00357 (Paper 6); IPR2019-00358 (Paper 6); IPR2019-00359
`(Paper 6); and IPR2019-00360 (Paper 6).
`3 Patent Owner filed similar Declarations in IPR2019-00356 (Exhibit 2001);
`IPR2019-00357 (Exhibit 2001); IPR2019-00358 (Exhibit 2001); IPR2019-
`00359 (Exhibit 2001); and IPR2019-00360 (Exhibit 2001).
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00355; IPR2019-00356; IPR2019-00357;
`IPR2019-00358; IPR2019-00359; IPR2019-00360
`(Patent 5,796,183)
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner must file updated
`mandatory notices identifying Mr. Hadley as back-up counsel in accordance
`with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3);
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner shall continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for these proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Hadley is to comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, including the August 2018 Update, 83 Fed. Reg.
`39,989 (Aug. 13, 2018), and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set
`forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Hadley is to be subject to the U.S.
`Patent and Trademark Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R.
`§ 11.19(a), and Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R.
`§§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00355; IPR2019-00356; IPR2019-00357;
`IPR2019-00358; IPR2019-00359; IPR2019-00360
`(Patent 5,796,183)
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`W. Karl Renner
`Jeremy Monaldo
`Dan Smith
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`axf-ptab@fr.com
`monaldo@fr.com
`dsmith@fr.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Joseph A. Rhoa
`Jonathan A. Roberts
`NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C.
`901 N. Glebe Road, 11th Floor
`Arlington, VA 22203-1808
`jar@nixon.com
`jr@nixon.com
`
`4
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
