throbber
United States Patent
`[45]
`Dec. 2, 1980
`Waldron
`___________________________.__.___-—————————————-—-
`
`[19]
`
`[11]
`
`4,237,421
`
`[54] SINGLE-ELECTRODE CAPACITANCE
`TOUCHPAD SENSOR SYSTEMS
`
`[75]
`
`Inventor: Wesley K. Waldron, Scotia, N.Y.
`
`[73] Assignee: General Electric Company,
`Schenectady, N.Y.
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 952,705
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Oct. 19, 1978
`
`Int. Cl.3 ........................ H03K 3/26; GOBB 13/26
`[51]
`[52] U.S. Cl. ........................................ 328/5; 307/ 116;
`307/308; 340/562
`[58] Field of Search .................... 328/5; 307/308, 116;
`331/65; 340/552, 365 C; 202/DIG. l
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3,846,780
`3,846,791
`3,893,035
`4,016,490
`4,107,555
`4,136,291
`
`11/1974 Gilcher ................................ 340/562
`
`307/308
`11/1974
`Foster
`.. 307/307
`
`7/1975 Higgens ............
`.
`
`4/1977 Weckenmann et a1.
`ZOO/DIG. 1
`
`8/ 1978 Haas et a1. ................... 328/5
`1/1979 Waldron .............................. 307/308
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`IBM Tech. Disclre. Blttn., Tech-Sensing Circuit, J. A.
`Williams vol. 17, No. 1, 6/74 pp. 166 & 167.
`
`Primary Examiner—Stanley D. Miller, Jr.
`Assistant Examiner—B. P. Davis
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Geoffrey H. Krauss; Marvin
`Snyder; James C. Davis
`
`ABSTRACT
`[57]
`Each of an array of capacitive touchpad sensors has a
`single touchpad electrode fabricated upon a substrate
`and accessible to user personnel, with series coupling
`and shunt capacitance being provided respectively be-
`tween a driving generator and the touchpad electrode,
`and the touchpad electrode and an array ground. Each
`capacitive touchpad sensor operates with a sense ampli-
`fier to provide a high density sensor array requiring
`relatively low driving voltage amplitudes and may be
`utilized with driven shields and a normalization net-
`work to provide reliable capacitance sensing with re-
`duced sensitivity to contamination of the surface of the
`sensor array.
`
`20 Claims, 8 Drawing Figures
`
`
`
`ref
`
`APPLE 1011
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1011
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 2, 1980
`
`Sheet 1 of4
`
`4,237,421
`
`£79.]
`
`5'
`
`I5
`
`{TN
`
`
`[579.2
`
`' E ref
`
`19
`
`TP.
`
`1_0
`
`l20
`
`- 50,1
`
`TP2
`
`92
`
`l2b
`
`0E ’
`O 2
`
`t
`.
`
`OC
`
`C.“
`
`IOn
`
`TPn
`
`2
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 2, 1980
`
`Sheet 2 of 4
`
`4,237,421
`
`III
`
`V/
`
`I
`
`
`
`51.5....AM»
`
`.v..
`
`.0I
`
`I[
`
`...r
`
`
`
`Rum...4.“...
`.:........
`
`
`.1.......L
`
`
`u.............:w......".......,.
`
`.......H...a..n..I...
`
`.7v!)nlat.2.
`
`..//.....,
`
`P
`
`AA.“
`""
`w}
`l,“
`
`na
`
`’4“1.1.
`
`COLUMN I COLUMN 2
`
`COLUMN J
`
`7b3
`
`
`
`37b.0
`
`370
`
`35b
`
`35¢
`
`P|2 0-- TPI
`
`,3
`
`a
`
`3
`
`8
`
`39¢:
`
`TP2 2 on. TP2;
`
`8
`
`b
`
`39b
`
`TP32 0" TP3,3
`
`8c
`
`39c
`
`320
`
`32
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 2, 1980
`
`Sheet 3 of4
`
`4,237,421
`
`F79. 5'
`
`
`
`WNEF0RAW
`
`59'
`
`600
`
`Fig.6
`
`—
`
`WAVEFORM
`
`'
`
`64
`
`ENABLE
`
`t E
`
`ref.
`5|
`
`‘
`'
`
`} 'Eo
`52
`
`V
`
`'
`
`l
`
`53
`
`19'
`
`.
`

`
`R3
`
`R5
`‘
`
`o
`
`-J...
`.‘l‘v‘~—C
`I
`-J--
`T
`
`T
`g S
`29u/
`
`v
`
`'SHIELD
`
`’m Ex
`
`'
`
`72
`
`R6
`
`7 D4
`
`*
`
`03
`
`R7
`
`55
`
`70b
`.
`
`E ref2 ’
`
`4
`
`4
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Dec. 2, 1980
`
`Sheet4 of4
`
`4,237,421
`
`Hg. 3
`
`LEVEL CLAMPING
`
`
`NETWORK
`
`
`a
`
`(Z)
`
`0
`
`5m
`
`a
`
`2
`
`"k
`
`°0
`o
`
`Wk
`_
`' 3k
`
`sz
`I
`14;—
`
`80k
`LEVEL CLAMPING
`NETWORK
`k
`
`(2)
`
`m/
`
`l0k
`
`80k'
`
`85
`
`6
`8 °
`
`'
`
`570
`'
`
`57k
`
`57,,
`
`.
`
`'
`
`E .
`
`8K
`88"
`'
`a so
`58
`.
`
`58' 7
`
`SHIELD
`SENSE
`CIRCUIT
`
`80n
`
`LEVEL CLAMPING
`NETWORK
`3
`
`(2)
`
`IOn
`
`92a
`
`95a
`
`
`
`I
`—_J_—_—
`‘-‘
`
`95
`
`,
`
`95b
`
`SEQUENCER
`
`92
`
`:
`E
`
`COUNTER a LOGIC
`
`95c
`
`5
`
`

`

`1
`
`4,237,421
`
`SINGLE-ELECTRODE CAPACITANCE
`TOUCHPAD SENSOR SYSTEMS
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`5
`
`10
`
`20
`
`The present invention relates to user-actuated sensors
`and, more particularly, to a noVel single electrode ca-
`pacitance touchpad sensor and related system electron-
`ics.
`Conventional capacitance touchpad devices typically
`require three separate electrodes, fabricated upon at
`least one surface of a supporting substrate. Typically,
`the touchpad electrode is fabricated upon the opposite
`side of a relatively thick dielectric substrate from the
`remaining two electrodes and may require an area of 15
`about one square inch. Even with relatively large
`touchpad electrode areas, the active capacitance of the
`sensor is typically less than 5 picofarads, whereby ge-
`ometry variations, mask registration or parasitic capaci-
`tance problems will typically result in device capaci-
`tance variations of up to 2 picofarads, and create a de-
`vice of extremesensitivity to design process variations.
`Thus, the conventional touchpad sensor devices, being
`of a relatively high impedance design, exhibit signifi-
`cant performance differences between sensors, even
`when several sensors are arrayed upon the same sub-
`strate and fabricated simultaneously. It is known to
`alleviate parasitic capacitance coupling problems by
`utilizing relatively large device areas and relatively
`large amplitude of driving voltages. It is desirable to
`provide arrays of capacitive touchpad sensors having
`both a reduced sensor area, to provide for greater sen-
`sor density in the array, and with reduced requirements
`for the amplitude of the drive voltages, to provide
`greater safety to user personnel (contacting the touch
`electrodes upon which at least a portion of the drive
`voltage appears) and to reduce driving and sensing
`circuit complexity and attendant cost.
`BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`In accordance with the invention, a novel single-elec-
`trode capacitance touchpad sensor, for use in touchpad
`sensor arrays, comprises a single electrode fabricated
`upon the surface of a substrate and forming a touchpad
`capable of being contacted by user personnel to activate
`the sensor. The differential input of a sense amplifier is
`connected between the touchpad electrode and the
`electrical ground bus of the array, with a coupling ca-
`pacitor being utilized between a pulse generator driving
`the sensor and the touch electrode. The input capaci-
`tance of the sense amplifier and other parasitic capaci-
`tance appear in shunt from the touch electrode to sys-
`tem ground. The touchpad electrode is a circuit node
`formed of any conductive or semiconductive material
`deposited upon the dielectric substrate. Contacting the
`touch electrode introduces the body-to-ground capaci-
`tance into the electrode node. The user capacitance is
`greater than the coupling capacitance (from the sensor
`driver) which is in turn greater than the input capaci-
`tance of the sense amplifier, to provide a positive node
`capacitance change when the node is touched.
`In presently preferred embodiments, each of the
`novel single-electrode touchpads,
`in an array of both
`spatially-multiplexed
`and
`non-spatially-multiplexed
`types,
`is surrounded by a shield electrode, with the
`shield electrode being driven to minimize the leakage
`current effect induced in each sensor of the array, as by
`touchpad electrode surface contamination and the like
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`2
`external influences. Level-clamping circuitry is utilized
`to assure reliable establishment of the “no-touch” out-
`put of the sensor to be greater than a reference condi-
`tion, with the sensor output in the “touch” condition
`being reliably less than the reference, whereby the sen—
`sor output is established only by the presence or absence
`of the body-to-ground capacitance of a user contacting
`the associated touchpad electrode.
`In another preferred embodiment, each of a multiplic-
`ity of sensors contains an additional impedance between
`the touchpad element and the sense amplifier, to able
`time-multiplex operation.
`Accordingly, it is an object ‘of the present invention
`to provide novel single electrOde capacitive touchpad
`sensor and arrays thereof, for reliably ascertaining the
`presence or absence of a “touch” condition.
`This and other objects of the present invention will
`become apparent upon consideration of the following
`detailed description,
`taken in conjunction with the
`drawings.
`'
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of one of my novel
`single-electrode capacitive touchpad sensors, illustrat-
`ing the principles of operation thereof; '
`FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an array of the
`single-electrode capacitive touchpad sensors of FIG. 1;
`FIG. 3 is a frOut view of a substrate containing an
`array of touchpad electrodes for a non-multiplexed
`touchpad array, and illustrating the positioning of a
`shield therefore;
`FIG. 4 is a front view of a substrate containing an
`array of touchpad electrodes for a spatially—multiplexed
`array of single-electrode capacitive touchpad sensors;
`FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a capacitive touch-
`pad sensor having a level-clamping network;
`FIG. 6 is a pair of coordinated graphs illustrating the
`driving and response waveforms for the sensor of FIG.
`5;
`
`FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a capacitive touch-
`pad sensor having a level-clamping network'and an
`active netWork for driving a sensor array shield to mini-
`mize effects of surface contamination; and
`FIG. 8 is a schematic block diagram of a time-multi-
`plexed array of a plurality of capacitive touchpad sen-
`sors.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`Referring initially to FIG: 1, a capacitive touchpad
`sensor 10 includes a touchpad electrode 11, typically
`fabricated upon a surface of a dielectric substrate (illus-
`trated in FIGS. 3 and 4 herein-below) to be accessible
`for contact by user personnel. A single lead 11a from
`touchpad 11 is utilized to couple the touchpad to one
`input lead 13a of a differential-input sense amplifier 12,
`having its remaining input lead 13b coupled to a source
`14 of a reference potential Eref. The remaining terminal
`of the reference source 14 is coupled to a common bus
`15 of the sensor. Sense amplifier 12 has an input capaci-
`tance between inputs 13a and 13b, whereby a capaci-
`tance Cp appears in shunt with the sense amplifier-
`source combination,
`that
`is, capacitance C}! appears
`between touchpad electrode lead 110 and sensor com-
`mon bus 15. One lead of a coupling capacity C1 is con-
`nected to the junction between touch electrode lead 11a
`and sense amplifier input 13a, with the remaining lead of
`
`6
`
`

`

`3
`capacitor C1 being connected to a sensor input terminal
`17 A sensor input common terminal 18 is connected to
`common bus 15.
`A waveform generator (not shown). as known to the
`art, is coupled between sensor input terminals 17 and 18
`to provide a driving waveform. .In my, preferred em-
`bodiment, this driving waveform is a train of substan-
`tially rectangular, unipolar pulses having a resting level
`of essentially zero volts and a peak level of Ed volts. A
`division of the driving pulse voltage amplitude occurs at
`the input of sense amplifier 12, for comparison against
`the reference voltage of reference source 14, whereby
`the magnitude E0 of the potential at the sense amplifier
`output 13c is indicative of the contacting of touchpad
`electrode 11 by user personnel (indicated by closure of
`imaginary switch S, placing the user personnel body-to-
`ground capacitance CT between electrical ground and
`the junction of coupling capacitance C; and shunt ca-
`pacitance GP) or the non-contacting of touchpad elec-
`trode 11 by user personnel (indicated by the open condi-
`tion of imaginary switch S, whereby body-to-ground
`capacitance CTis removed from the sensor circuit).
`Touchpad electrode 11 is typically formed by metal-
`lizing an area upon a dielectric substrate with a quantity
`of a conductor or semiconductor material to form a
`circuit node thereat. Proper operation of the sensor
`requires that the coupling capacitance C1 is very much
`larger than the shunt capacitance C1, and that the body-
`to-ground capacitance Cris very much larger than the
`coupling capacitance. Typically,
`the body-to-ground
`capacitance Cris about 70 picofarads, and the equiva-
`lent input capacitance of the sense amplifier appearing
`as shunt capacitance Cp is about 5 picofarads, whereby
`a coupling capacitance 01 of about 22 picofarads may be
`utilized.
`in the “no-touch” condition, capaci-
`In operation,
`tance Cris not present in the circuit and the relatively
`narrow pulses of the driving waveform are coupled to
`sense amplifier input 12a by the capacitive divider
`formed of coupling capacitance C] and shunt capaci-
`tance Cp. The “no-touch” voltage amplitude E1 at sense
`amplifier input
`lead 13a is approximately equal
`to
`(C1E4)/(Cp+C1). The magnitude Ere] of reference
`source 14 is selected to be less than E1 for the no-touch
`condition, whereby the magnitude E0 of the voltage at
`sense amplifier output 130, is of a first condition, e.g. a
`non-zero voltage. In the “touch” condition, where ca-
`pacitance Crappears in parallel with shunt capacitance
`Cp, the magnitude E2 of the voltage at sense amplifier
`input 13a is determined by the voltage divider formed
`by the coupling capacitance and the paralleled CT and
`Cp capacitances,
`and is
`approximately equal
`to
`(Ed(C1))/(CP+C1+CT). The value of C1 or Cp may be
`adjusted as required to assure that the magnitude E2 of
`the voltage at sense amplifier input 13a, in the touch
`condition, is less than the magnitude Ergf of the refer-
`ence source, whereby the magnitude E) at sense ampli-
`fier output 13c assumes a value different from the mag-
`nitude thereof in the “no-touch” condition, e.g. E0 is
`approximately zero volts.
`Referring now to FIG. 2, an array of a plurality N of
`sensors 10is formed by connecting together the cou-
`pling capacitor input lead,
`i.e. that lead of coupling
`capacitor C11, C12,
`.
`.
`.
`, C1". furthest from the associ-
`ated touchpad electrode TP1, TP2, .
`.
`.
`, TPn. The con-
`nected coupling capacitor input leads are connected to
`an array input terminal 17’, while an array common bus
`15’ is coupled to another input terminal 18'. Pulse gener-
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4,237,421
`
`4
`ation circuitry of known type is coupled between input
`terminals 17’ and 18’ to simultaneously drive all of the
`sensors with the unipolar pulse train, having a peak
`amplitude Ed. Each of the individual sensors 100—1011in
`the array includes, in addition to its coupling capacitor
`C11—C1n, and the touchpad VTPl—TPn associated there-
`with, an associated sense amplifier 1241—1211, having an
`input lead coupled to the junction between the coupling
`capacitor and touchpad electrode of the associated sen-
`sor. The input capacitance of each of sense amplifiers
`12a—12n appears as a shunt capacitance Cpl—CW, cou-
`pled between the system ground bus and the junction
`beween the associated touchpad electrode and Coupling
`capacitor. The remaining inputsof all of sense amplifi-
`ers 12a—12n are advantageously connected together to a
`single reference potential input 19, at which a voltage of
`magnitude Eref is impressed. The. operation of each
`sensor 10a—10n in the array is identical to the herein-
`above described operation of the single sensor. It should
`be understood that the array may have the touchpad
`electrodes TPl—TPn arranged in linear or two-dimen-
`sional fashion, and may be of any practical size, being
`limited only by the ability of the driving circuitry, cou-
`pled between input terminals 17' and 18', to form pulses
`across the total capacitance of the array to be driven.
`The requirements on the driving circuitry complexity
`are reduced by the relatively large detectable difference
`in voltages appearing at the sense amplifier inputs in the
`“touch” and “no-touch” conditions. Illustratively,_with
`the aforementioned values of shunt, coupling and body—
`to-ground capacitances, and with a pulse amplitude E1
`'of about five volts (as available from TTL logic inte-
`grated circuits and the like), the sense amplifier input
`voltage E1 in the “no-touch” condition is about four
`volts while the magnitude E2 of the sense amplifier
`input voltage in the “touch” condition is about one volt.
`It will be seen that large relative differences in the sense
`amplifier input voltage are present and easily discem-
`able by the sense amplifier, even for substantial percent-
`age changes in the values of coupling, shunt and body-
`to-ground capacitance. Thus, reliable operation of the
`individual sensors in an array is facilitated and process-
`ing variation dependence is reduced.
`Referring now to FIG. 3, a non-spatially-multiplexed
`array of touchpad sensors is fabricated upon a dielectric ‘
`substrate 25. The touchpad electrodes TP1,1—TP3,3 are
`fabricated of a conductive or semiconductive material
`upon a surface 25a of the substrate, with the substrate
`being subsequently positioned for exposure to the exter-
`nal environment, whereby user personnel may contact
`one or more of the touchpad electrodes. In the illus-
`trated embodiment, the nine touchpad electrodes are
`arranged in a 3x3 array, with each touchpad being of
`substantially square shape and separated from the re-
`maining touchpads. It should be understood that the
`shape of the individual touchpads is a matter of design,
`as is the area' of each thereof and the spacing therebe-
`tween. Advantageously, as the individual touchpads are
`not required to have a capacitive value with respect to
`other elements of the sensor array and system, in the
`“no-touch” condition (with the only capacitance being
`added to the system externally by a contact with a
`touchpad); the touchpad area can be reduced and the
`array sensor density can be increased.
`Each touchpad is in connection with a conductive or ‘
`semiconductive lead 2711—271, which may be fabricated
`at the same time as the associated touchpad is deposited
`upon the substrate surface, and may be fabricated of the
`
`7
`
`

`

`5
`same material as the touchpad electrode. Advanta-
`geously, all of the touchpads and their associated leads
`are fabricated in one simultaneous operation, such as by
`silk screening a film of a conductive material upon the
`substrate surface 25a. As will be seen, each touchpad
`electrode lead 25a—25i is spatially separated from every
`other lead and from all touchpads other than the touch-
`pad to which the lead is connected Each lead termi-
`nates in a single pad, aperture or other formation,
`known to the printed circuitry and the like arts, to allow
`connection of each lead to the associated coupling ca-
`pacitor and an associated sense amplifier input. In the
`illustrated example, with nine independent touchpads,
`nine coupling capacitor-sense amplifier combinations
`are required. In very large arrays of M touchpad sen-
`sors, a total of M connections to the touchpad-elec-
`trade-bearing substrate (one connection to each of the
`M leads thereon) is required.
`The touchpad-electrode-bearing substrate may ad-
`vantageously be fabricated with the deposition of a
`shield electrode 29 covering a major portion of the area
`remaining after fabrication of the touchpads and associ-
`ated leads, but being insulated therefrom. The shield
`provides a certain degree of isolation between each
`touch pad—lead group and may, as described hereinbe-
`low, be coupled to the sensor circuitry to reduce effects
`of surface contamination and like, which contamination
`may be brought about by deposit of skin oil and other
`contaminants from the contacting portion of the user
`personnel onto the substrate surface and contactible
`surface areas of the touchpad electrodes. A separate
`lead 29a is provided for the shield.
`Referring now to FIG. 4, a very large array of capac-
`itive sensors has a multiplicity of touchpad electrodes
`fabricated upon the surface 32a of a dielectric substrate
`32, and is arranged for spatial—multiplexing to reduce
`the total number of leads to which connection must be
`made at the substrate. The spatially-multiplexed array
`of touchpad electrodes is fabricated as a two-dimen-
`sional matrix having I columns and K rows, with an
`additional column of K touchpads for enabling a row-
`select function. Thus, an array having M individual
`selectable functions, where M=J XK, has a touchpad
`array of Kx (J = 1)
`touchpads. Illustratively, for an
`array wherein M=9, J =3 and K=3, a total of 12 touch-
`pads are utilized. The three touchpads TP,”, TPbJ, and
`TP,, are not spatially multiplexed, due to their use as
`row selectors, and are each arranged one above the
`other on the substrate surface, with individual leads 35a,
`35b and 35c being integrally connected to the associated
`row-select touchpad and separate from all other touch-
`pads and interconnection leads. The remaining plurality
`(J XK) of touchpads are arranged with J touchpads in
`each of the K rows and with connective leads integrally
`formed between each of the touchpads in a column and
`extending beyond one of the end touchpad electrodes in
`the column to form a lead for all of the K touchpads in
`that column to' the remainder of the sensor circuitry
`associated with each column. Thus, touchpads TP1,1,
`TP2,1 and TP3,1 of column 1 of the array, are intercon-
`nected by lead portion 370 (between touchpad elec-
`trode TPM and TP,”) and lead portion 37b (between
`touchpad electrode TP2,1 and TP3,1) with an additional
`lead portion 37c extending from an edge of touchpad
`electrode TP3,1 opposite the remainder of the touchpad
`electrodes in that column, to provide a lead for connec-
`tion to the single coupling capacitor and single sense
`amplifier for the touchpad column 1 sensor. Similarly,
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`4-5
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4,237,421
`
`6
`electrode interconnective and lead portions 38a, 38b
`and 38c are utilized to interconnect
`the touchpads
`TPLZ, TP2,2, and TP3,2, forming column 2, while inter-
`connective and lead portions 39a, 39b and 396 are uti-
`lized to connect touchpad electrodes TP1,3, TP2,3, and
`TP3,3 to form the J: 3 column furthest from the column
`of row-select touchpad electrodes. It should be under~
`stood that the spatially-multiplexed touchpad sensor
`array may be utilized with or without a shield electrode,
`and the spatially-multiplexed array of FIG. 4 is, for
`purposes of illustration, shown without the presence of
`the shield.
`The spatially-multiplexed array of sensors is operated
`by user personnel initially contacting that one of row-
`select touchpads THU—Th). to designate that one of
`rows 1—K in which the desired touchpad is found. Illus-
`tratively, if the input function requires that data associ-
`ated with touchpad TP3,2 be input to a system to which
`the touchpad sensor array is coupled, the row-select
`touchpad TPc, is initially contacted to select the K=3
`(bottom) row, and then the individual touchpad elec-
`trode along that row e.g. touchpad electrode TE3,2 (in
`column 2), is contacted to complete the input function.
`It should be understood that suitable storage means,
`such as logic latches and the like, and logic gating
`means (not shown), such as are known to the art, are
`utilized to: store the output of one of the sense amplifi-
`ers associated with the row-select portion of the array;
`store the output of one of the sense amplifiers coupled
`to a particular column (with one sense amplifier being
`coupled to each individual one of the column leads 37c,
`38c or 39c); and logically detect the presence of a partic-
`ular column and row signal from the storage means to
`determine which element of the matrix has been en-
`tered. It should also be understood that the use of non-
`spatially-rnultiplexed row-select sensors with a spatial-
`ly-multiplexed column-connected sensor array allows
`the number of connections to substrate 32 to be mini-
`mized relative to the non—spatially-multiplexed sensor
`array of FIG. 3, e.g. for a nine-element array, the spa-
`tially-multiplexed embodiment (FIG. 4) requires only
`six contacts, while the non-spatially-multipleried em-
`bodiment requires nine contacts. It will be seen that
`even greater reduction of substrate connections occur
`for large arrays, e.g. for a ten by ten array (100 ele-
`ments), the non-spatially-multiplexed array requires 100
`individual connections, while the spatially-multiplexed
`array requires only 20 connections.
`Referring now to FIGS. 5 and 6, reliable operation
`with relatively low drive voltages is further assured by
`incorporating a noval level clamping network into each
`sensor 50 of an array. It should be understood that the
`touchpad electrode TP, shown for the level-clamped
`capacitor touchpad sensor 50, may be a single touchpad
`electrode, in a non-spatially-rnultiplexed array, or may
`be any one of a plurality of touchpad electrode areas
`connected together to form one column (or row) of a
`spatially-multiplexed array. The clamped sensor 50
`contains, in addition to touchpad electrode TP (and its
`imaginary switch S representing the contact or non-
`contact of the body-to-ground capacitance CTthereto),
`a sense amplifier 52 having one input 53a thereof cou-
`pled to a common node 51' and having a remaining
`input 53b coupled to a source of reference potential of
`magnitude Eref- A capacitance Cp is connected between
`the touchpad-sense amplifier input junction and a sensor
`ground bus 55; the shunt capacitance C]: may be the
`equivalent input capacitance of the sensor amplifier,
`
`8
`
`

`

`4,237,421
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`7
`either alone or in parallel with an additional physical
`capacitance.
`A pair of electrical resistances R1 and R2 are series
`connected between a sensor input terminal 57 and a
`common terminal 58, coupled to a common bus 55. A
`driving waveform, comprised of a train of unipolar
`pulses having a resting amplitude of approximately zero
`volts and a peak amplitude of Egl volts, with a predeter—
`mined pulse width Tw, is applied between input termi-
`nals 57 and 58. The values of resistances R1 and R2 are
`selected to provide a Thevenin equivalent source hav-
`ing an output voltage Eg2 and having a very low source
`impedance equal to the parallel combination of R1 and
`R2. Another electrical resistance R3 is coupled from the
`junction of resistance R1 and R2 to the touchpad elec-
`trode TP. Coupling capacitor C1 is connected between
`sensor driven input terminal 57 and node 5]; node 51 is
`also connected to the anode of a diode D1, having its '
`cathode coupled to the junction of resistance R3 and the
`touchpad electrode TP. A resistance R4 of relatively
`high value is coupled across diode D1.
`In operation, the Thevenin equivalent voltage Eg2 is
`predeterminately selected, by choice of suitable values
`for resistances R1 and R2, to be greater than the refer-
`ence voltage Eref applied to sense amplifier lead 53b.
`Commencing with the rising edge 60a of the input pulse
`(FIG. 6, waveform A) the voltage E1), (between sense
`amplifier input lead 53:: and sensor ground) instanta-
`neously rises to a value Em1=DN(Eg1——VD1)+V01,
`where KN is
`the
`“no-touch”
`capacitance
`ratio
`(C1/(C1+Cp)) and V3] is the “on” voltage across diode
`D1. This instantaneous rise of the sense amplifier input
`waveform (FIG. 6, waveform B) is shown as edge 62.
`The amplitude Em] is selected to be greater than the
`steady state Thevenin equivalent voltage Eg2, which is
`itself greater than the reference voltage.
`The output voltage of sense amplifier 52 is latched at
`a time t: following the leading edge 600 of drive pulse
`Egl when an enable signal arrives on line 54. The time
`tc should be about one time constant T of the clamped
`sensor circuit in the “no-touch” condition, and should
`also be much less than the time constant of the circuit in
`the “touch” condition, in which condition the circuit
`includes resistance tending to charge capacitor C1 such
`that Em asymptotically approaches Eg2. The drive pulse
`width tw of E31 must therefore be greater than to. Thus,
`the input voltage E;,, is greater than the Thevenin volt—
`age Eg2 and always greater than the reference voltage
`Eref; to assure that the amplifier output 53c is “oft” and
`the no-touch condition is reliably indicated by the state
`of the sense amplifier output voltage E0.
`In the “touch” condition, the sense amplifier input
`voltage Em assumes an initial value of Em2=K-
`7(Egi—V01)+VD1 where KT=(C1/(C1+CP+CI))-
`The touch constant Kris selected such that the voltage
`E1172 is always less than both the Thevenin voltage Eg2
`and the reference voltage Emf, prior to enablement of
`the sense amplifier "latch, whereby the differential sense
`amplifier input voltage (ErefK—Emz) is reliably de-
`tected by the sense amplifier to enable another condi~
`tion of output voltage E0, indicative of the “touch”
`condition, at sense amplifier output 53c.
`Diode D1 prevents the sensor node voltage Em from
`charging to the reference level Eg2 prior to enablement
`of sense amplifier 52 and the comparator action thereof
`during touch conditions. Resistance R4acts to discharge
`coupling capacitor C1 during the interval between driv-
`ing pulses, i.e. when the input pulse level is essentially
`
`8
`equal to zero volts; resistance R4 is selected such that
`the time constants of resistance R4 and coupling capaci-
`tor C1 is much greater than the driving voltage pulse
`width tw, but much less than the cycle time of the drive
`signal Eg1, whose duty cycle is relatively low, e.g. a
`duty cycle of about 0001.
`Referring now to FIG. 7, minimization of surface
`contamination effects and cross-talk with an array of
`touchpads is provided by isolating each touchpad and
`lead thereof by the aforementioned conductive shield,
`preferably formed of a thin film of a conductive mate-
`rial, .such as indium tin oxide and the like. Advanta-
`geously, the shield has a very low circuit impedance to
`provide the desired reduction in cross-talk, i.e. touch-
`pad—to—touchpad coupling. In the event of surface con-
`tamination, the shield current I, is a non-zero value,
`generated by the
`contamination current
`flowing
`through the low circuit impedance. The shield contami-
`nation current is conducted to sensor circuit 50’ via
`shield lead 290,
`Sensor circuit 50’, wherein like reference designa-
`tions are utilized, with respect to FIG. 5, for like func-
`tions, also includes a diode D2 having its anode coupled
`to the junction of resistance R1 and R3, and having its
`cathode coupled to resistance R2. A PNP transister Q
`has its base electrode coupled to the junction between
`the cathode of diode D2 and resistance R2; the emitter
`electrode of transistor Q is connected to shield lead 290
`and is also connected to sensor circuit input terminal 57
`via an emitter resistance R51, while the collector of
`transistor Q is connected to the anode of a detector
`diode D3 and is also connected to common bus 55 via a
`series circuit including a collector resistance R5 and a
`diode D42. The cathode of the detector diode is coupled
`to a diode detector load consisting of a capacitor C2 and
`a resistance R7, both of which have their remaining
`terminals coupled to common bus 55. The inverting (—)
`input 700 of a second sense amplifier (comparator) 72 is
`coupled to the junction between the detector diode
`cathode, capacitor C2 and resistor R7. The non-invert-
`ing input 70b of the sense amplifier is connected to a
`source of a second reference voltage Ere/2. The sense
`amplifier output 70c provides a signal Ex, indicative of
`the comparison of shield contamination current against
`a reference voltage (Erefl).
`In operation, prior to the first driving pulse of ampli-
`tude Eg1, the potential difference between input termi—
`nals 57 and 58 is essentially zero and transistor Q is
`cut-off, whereby a current of substantially zero magni-
`tude flows through collector resistance R5 and diode
`D4. The collector resistance voltage drop is thus ap-
`proximately zero and the detector capacitance C2 is
`charged to substantially zero volts. The detector load
`capacitance voltage appears at sense amplifier input 70a
`and is less than the magnitude Eref2 of the reference
`voltage at the remaining comparator input lead 701),
`whereby the sense amplifier output 70c is in a first con—
`dition indicative of shield current being less than the
`limit established by the magnitude Erefl.
`Upon occurrence of the first driving pulse, the volt—
`age at input terminal 57 rises to a magnitude Eg1 and the
`base electrode of transistor Q receives a voltage of
`magnitude (((EgI—Ed2)R2(R1+R2))“R2), where Ed: is
`the voltage drop across diode D2. The value of resis-
`tance R5 is selected such that the emitterbase diode of
`the transistor is forward biased and emitter current is
`injected into the emitter electrode of the transistor. The
`magnitude of the total emitter electrode current is the
`
`'
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`4o
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`6O
`
`6.5
`
`9
`
`

`

`4,237,421
`
`9
`sum of the shield current (received via lead 290) and the
`current injected by resistance R5, due to the difference
`in potential
`thereacross. The summed currents flow
`from the transistor collector electrode and through
`resistance R6 and diode D4 to ground whereby a voltage
`drop exists thereacross, which voltage is the sum of a
`steady voltage due to the current injected by action of
`emitter resistance R5 and a voltage due to the injection
`of the shield current. As increasing values of shield
`current are injected into the emitter of the transister, the
`voltage at the anode of detector D3 rises. The increase
`in the voltage further forward-biases detector diode D3
`and causes additional current to be injected into capaci-
`tance C2 to increase the

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket