throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________
`
`
`APPLE, INC.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`UUSI, LLC dba NARTRON
`
`Patent Owner
`
`____________________
`
`
`Cases IPR2019-00355; IPR2019-00356
`
`Patent No. 5,796,183
`
`____________________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
`EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PRELIMINARY RESPONSE
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`2910186
`
`

`

`
`
`Case IPR2019-00355
`Patent No. 5,796,183
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.5, Patent Owner submits the present Unopposed
`
`Motion for Extension of Time, requesting that the Board extend the due date for
`the Preliminary Response fourteen (14) days—from April 9, 2019 until April 23,
`2019 to synchronize the due dates for Preliminary Reponses in three IPRs, namely
`IPR2019-00355, -00356, and -00357. Petitioner does not oppose Patent Owner’s
`Motion. The Unopposed Motion is supported by a showing of good cause. Thus,
`Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board grant the Unopposed Motion.
`
`The Board authorized the filing of this Unopposed Motion via its email of
`March 29, 2019.
`
`The Board has the authority to modify the due date for the preliminary
`response on a showing of good cause. See 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5(c)(1) and (2). Here,
`the facts and circumstances surrounding this case, as discussed below, support a
`showing of good cause for extending the due date for the preliminary response.
`
`Petitioner filed all of the following IPRs on November 29, 2018: IPR2019-
`00355, IPR2019-00356, IPR2019-00357, IPR2019-00358, IPR2019-00359, and
`IPR2019-00360. All six of these IPRs challenge the same patent. Based on the
`slightly varied dates of the PTAB notices, the current patent owner preliminary
`response due dates are as follows:
`
`
`IPR2019-00355: April 9, 2019
`
`
`IPR2019-00356: April 9, 2019
`
`
`IPR2019-00357: April 23, 2019
`
`
`IPR2019-00358: May 5, 2019
`
`
`IPR2019-00359: May 5, 2019
`
`
`IPR2019-00360: May 5, 2019.
`Patent Owner seeks to synchronize the first three patent owner preliminary
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2910186
`
`

`

`
`
`Case IPR2019-00355
`Patent No. 5,796,183
`
`response dates to April 23, 2019, in order to address the first three petitions at the
`same time. This will simplify the proceedings by reducing the number of distinct
`due dates from three to two—with the first three preliminary responses due on
`April 23, 2019 and the second three preliminary responses due on May 5, 2019.
`This may also simplify the proceedings should institution occur, as it will likely
`reduce the number of depositions that will be needed because the due dates will be
`closer together.
`
`Patent Owner submits that the extension period of fourteen days is
`reasonable, and will not adversely impact the remaining schedule of the
`proceedings if an inter partes review is instituted. Patent Owner notes that the
`Board has granted similar motions in other proceedings. See Ubisoft, Inc., et al. v.
`Uniloc USA, Inc., et al., IPR2017-01290, Paper 10 (PTAB Jul. 21, 2017) (granting
`patent owner’s motion for extension of time to file preliminary response in
`recognition of good cause to synchronize due dates for three IPRs filed on same
`date against patents involved in related litigation).
`
`For the foregoing reasons, the present Unopposed Motion is supported by a
`showing of good cause warranting the extension of the due date for the preliminary
`response. Accordingly, Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board grant the
`Unopposed Motion.
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`By: /s/ Joseph A. Rhoa
` Joseph A. Rhoa
` Reg. No. 37,515
` Jonathan A. Roberts
` Reg. No. 68,565
`NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C.
`
`2
`
`2910186
`
`
`
`Dated: April 1, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2019-00355
`Patent No. 5,796,183
`
`901 North Glebe Road, 11th Floor
`Arlington, VA 22203-1808
`Tel.: 703-816-4043
`Tel.: 703-816-4414
`Email: jar@nixonvan.com
`Email: jr@nixonvan.com
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`2910186
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Case IPR2019-00355
`Patent No. 5,796,183
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true copy of the foregoing Patent Owner’s
`
`Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Preliminary Response Pursuant
`
`to 37 C.F.R. § 42.5 was served on Petitioner Apple, Inc., on April 1, 2019, by
`
`emailing a copy to counsel at the email addresses listed below:
`
`W. Karl Renner, Reg. No. 41,265
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel: 202-783-5070
`Fax: 877-769-7945
`IPR39521-0062IP1@fr.com
`PTABInbound@fr.com
`Axf-ptab@fr.com
`monaldo@fr.com
`dsmith@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Joseph A. Rhoa
`Joseph A. Rhoa
`Reg. No. 37,515
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2910186
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket