throbber
4,237,421
`[11]
`United States Patent 19
`Dec. 2, 1980
`[45]
`Waldron
`coIIA
`
`[54] SINGLE-ELECTRODE CAPACITANCE
`TOUCHPAD SENSOR SYSTEMS
`
`[75]
`
`Inventor: Wesley K. Waldron, Scotia, N.Y.
`
`[73] Assignee: General Electric Company,
`Schenectady, N.Y.
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`IBM Tech.Disclre. Bltin., Toch-Sensing Circuit, J. A.
`Williams vol. 17, No. 1, 6/74 pp. 166 & 167.
`Primary Examiner—Stanley D. Miller, Jr.
`Assistant Examiner—B. P. Davis
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Geoffrey H. Krauss; Marvin
`Snyder; James C. Davis
`[57]
`ABSTRACT
`Each of an array of capacitive touchpad sensors has a
`single touchpad electrode fabricated upon a substrate
`and accessible to user personnel, with series coupling
`and shunt capacitance being provided respectively be-
`tween a driving generator and the touchpad electrode,
`and the touchpad electrode and an array ground. Each
`capacitive touchpadsensor operates with a sense ampli-
`fier to provide a high density sensor array requiring
`References Cited
`relatively low driving voltage amplitudes and may be
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`utilized with driven shields and a normalization net-
`3,846,780
`11/1974—Gilcher .....sssessssessesecsenescensoee 340/562
`work to provide reliable capacitance sénsing with re-
`
`3,846,791
`11/1974
`Foster ...
`a 307/308
`duced sensitivity to contamination of the surface of the
`
`3,893,035
`
`W/A9TS=Higgens............ .. 307/307
`sensor array.
`
`4,016,490
`4/1977 Weckenmannetal.
`200/DIG. 1
`4,107,555
`8/1978 Haas et all.
`
`-..c.sesesesseserseeeeteneres 328/5
`20 Claims, 8 Drawing Figures
`
` 1/1979—Waldron oo... seesssesssecsnereseneee 307/3084,136,291
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 952,705
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Oct. 19, 1978
`
`Int. C13 ..seeesesseeesnen HO03K 3/26; GO8B 13/26
`[51]
`[52] US. Ch. cesssccsstssescscenesssssseseeesnsen 328/5; 307/116;
`307/308; 340/562
`[58] Field of Search ..........-.-se 328/5; 307/308, 116;
`331/65; 340/552, 365 C; 202/DIG.1
`
`[56]
`
`
`
`APPLE 1011
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1011
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Dec. 2, 1980
`
`Sheet 1 of 4
`
`4,237,421
`
`Fig.d E
`
`d
`
`TLE
`18
`
`19
`
`[ey
`:
`
`nis
`
`2
`
`I
`
`Fo
`
`L
`
`15
`
`OF ref
`
`Fig.a
`
`2
`
`

`

`Sheet 2 of 4
`
`4,237,421
`
`
`o22E38>mwe,asdz_Nm=aa.a3r--a8-eee®ee@®eoeoeao®©x“IXOL=—NmSsaaaxnbbEEF8eeeo2S%>nn0=>a°oS
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Dec. 2, 1980
`
`35b
`
`35c
`
`3
`
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Dec. 2, 1980
`
`Sheet 3 of 4
`
`4,237,421
`
`Fig. S
`
`WAVEFORM
`A
`
`Egl
`
`60a
`
`Fig.6
`
`WAVEFORM
`
`i
`
`64
`
`ENABLE
`
`Ol
`
`
`
`1
`
`E rete
`
`r
`
`Fig?
`Egl
`87 gf OY
`
`A]
`
`1
`
`O
`
`V
`
`Rs
`
`R3
`
`|
`
`Q
`
`6
`ty-D4
`
`6
`
`58
`
`50)
`
`9
`
`~
`
`R4
`
`CEG
`
`p %2
`
`ae
`Ju.oper —C
`T
`I
`i.
`4 $ Sl
`
`29aY
`SHIELD
`> Ey
`
`ve
`
`DZ
`
`R7
`
`55
`
`E ref20
`
`o
`
`72
`
`70b
`
`4
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Dec.2, 1980
`
`Sheet 4 of 4
`
`4,237,421
`
`Fig. 8
`
`
`
`LEVEL CLAMPING
`NETWORK
`
`
`
`
`Ey
`
`4
`
`85
`
`;
`
`SHIELD]
`}
`On
`SENSE|
`|
`5In
`
`
`
`| LEVEL CLAMPINGNETWORK .CIRCUIT| [zn|!
`
`n
`(Z)
`TPh
`mn
`
`
`
`
`
`95
`=
`COUNTER & LoGic
`1
`
`95b
`
`F
`
`95c
`
`.
`
`1!
`10n
`
`| t |
`
`!
`
`92a
`
`95a
`
`|!| |
`
`1
`{
`
`SEQUENCER
`
`92
`
`86c
`sik
`80k
`57a
`ie
`LEVEL CLAMPING
`88a
`86a
`
`yO) Ro NETWORK|2|%
`
`
`
` 1 k90 (z)|Ty,|oy 2k|Zp|=
`
`87n
`58
`J sor’
`| ; k
`|
`se ||
`2Tk
`!
`ai
`
`10k
`
`~
`

`o

`
`I |
`
`5
`
`

`

`1
`
`4,237,421
`
`SINGLE-ELECTRODE CAPACITANCE
`TOUCHPAD SENSOR SYSTEMS
`
`BACKGROUNDOF THE INVENTION
`
`5
`
`Thepresent invention relates to user-actuated sensors
`and, more particularly, to a novel single electrode ca-
`pacitance touchpad sensor andrelated system electron-
`ics.
`
`Conventional capacitance touchpad devicestypically
`require three separate electrodes, fabricated upon at
`least one surface of a supporting substrate. Typically,
`the touchpad electrode is fabricated upon the opposite
`side of a relatively thick dielectric substrate from the
`remaining two electrodes and may require an area of
`about one square inch. Even with relatively large
`touchpad electrode areas, the active capacitance of the
`sensor is typically less than 5 picofarads, whereby ge-
`ometry variations, mask registration or parasitic capaci-
`tance problems will typically result in device capaci-
`tance variations of up to 2 picofarads, and create a de-
`vice of extreme.sensitivity to design process variations.
`Thus, the conventional touchpad sensor devices, being
`of a relatively high impedance design, exhibit signifi-
`cant performance differences between sensors, even
`whenseveral sensors are arrayed upon the same sub-
`strate and fabricated simultaneously. It is known to
`alleviate parasitic capacitance coupling problems by
`utilizing relatively large device. areas and relatively
`large amplitude of driving voltages. It is desirable to
`provide arrays of capacitive touchpad sensors having
`both a reduced sensor area, to provide for greater sen-
`sor density in the array, and with reduced requirements
`for the amplitude of the drive voltages, to provide
`greater safety to user personnel (contacting the touch
`electrodes upon which at least a portion of the drive
`voltage appears) and to reduce driving and sensing
`circuit complexity and attendant cost.
`BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`In accordance with the invention, a novel single-elec-
`trode capacitance touchpad sensor, for use in touchpad
`sensor arrays, comprises a single electrode fabricated
`upon the surface of a substrate and forming a touchpad
`capable ofbeing contacted by user personnel to activate
`the sensor. The differential input of a sense amplifier is
`connected between the touchpad electrode and the
`electrical ground bus of the array, with a coupling ca-
`pacitor being utilized between a pulse generator driving
`the sensor and the touch electrode. The input capaci-
`tance of the sense amplifier and other parasitic capaci-
`tance appear in shunt from the touch electrode to sys-
`tem ground. The touchpad electrode is a circuit node
`formed of any conductive or semiconductive material
`deposited upon the dielectric substrate. Contacting the
`touch electrode introduces the body-to-ground capaci-
`tance into the electrode node. The user capacitanceis
`greater than the coupling capacitance (from the sensor
`driver) which is in turn greater than the input capaci-
`tance of the sense amplifier, to provide a positive node
`capacitance change when the nodeis touched.
`In presently preferred embodiments, each of the
`novel single-electrode touchpads,
`in an array of both
`spatially-multiplexed
`and
`non-spatially-multiplexed
`types,
`is surrounded by a shield electrode, with the
`shield electrode being driven to minimize the leakage
`current effect induced in each sensorofthe array, as by
`touchpad electrode:surface contamination and the like
`
`2
`external influences. Level-clamping circuitry is utilized
`to assure reliable establishment of the “no-touch” out-
`put of the sensor to be greater than a reference condi-
`tion, with the sensor output in the “touch” condition
`being reliablyless than the.reference, whereby the sen-
`sor outputis established only by the presence or absence
`of the body-to-ground capacitance of a user contacting
`the associated touchpad electrode.
`In another preferred embodiment, each of a multiplic-
`ity of sensors contains an additional impedance between
`the touchpad element and the sense amplifier, to able
`time-multiplex operation.
`Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention
`to provide novel single electrode capacitive touchpad
`sensor and arrays thereof, for reliably ascertaining the
`presence or absence of a “touch” condition.
`This and other objects of the present invention will
`become apparent upon consideration of the following
`detailed description,.
`taken in conjunction with the
`drawings.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of one of my novel
`single-electrode capacitive touchpad sensors, illustrat-
`ing the principles of operation thereof,

`FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an array of the
`single-electrode capacitive touchpad sensors of FIG.1;
`FIG. 3 is a front view of a substrate containing an
`array of touchpad electrodes: for a non-multiplexed
`touchpad array, and illustrating the positioning of a
`shield therefore;
`FIG. 4 is a front view of a substrate containing an
`array of touchpadelectrodesfora spatially-multiplexed
`array of single-electrode capacitive touchpad sensors;
`FIG.5 is a schematic diagram of a capacitive touch-
`pad sensor having a level-clamping network;
`FIG.6 is a pair of coordinated graphsillustrating the
`driving and response waveformsfor the sensor of FIG.
`5;
`
`FIG.7 is a schematic diagram of a capacitive touch-
`pad sensor having a level-clamping network: and an
`active network for driving a sensor array shieldto mini-
`mize effects of surface contamination; and
`FIG.8 is a schematic block diagram of a time-mullti-
`plexed array of a plurality of capacitive touchpad sen-
`sors.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`Referring initially to FIG. 1, a capacitive touchpad
`sensor 10 includes a touchpad electrode 11, typically
`fabricated upon a surface of a dielectric substrate (illus-
`trated in FIGS. 3 and 4 herein-below) to be accessible
`for contact by user personnel. A single lead 11¢ from
`touchpad11 is utilized to couple the touchpad to one
`input lead 13a of a differential-input sense amplifier 12,
`having its remaining input lead 13d coupled to a source
`14 of a reference potential E,2: The remaining terminal
`of the reference source 14 is coupled to a common bus
`15 of the sensor. Sense amplifier 12 has an input capaci-
`tance between inputs 13@ and 13b, whereby a capaci-
`tance Cp appears in shunt with the sense amplifier-
`source combination,
`that
`is, capacitance C, appears
`between touchpad electrode lead 11¢ and sensor com-
`mon bus 15. One_lead of a coupling capacity C1 is con-
`nected tothe junction between touch electrode lead 114
`and sense amplifier input 13a, with the remaining lead of
`
`40
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`
`

`

`4,237,421
`
`15
`
`w0
`
`35
`
`3
`4
`capacitor C; being connected: to a sensor input terminal
`ation circuitry of known type is coupled between input
`17. A sensor input common terminal 18 is connected to
`terminals 17’ and 18’ to simultaneously drive all of the
`common bus 15.
`.
`-
`sensors with the unipolar pulse train, having a peak
`A waveform generator (not shown), as known to.the
`amplitude Eg. Each of the individual sensors 10a-10x in
`art, is coupled between sensor input terminals 17.and 18
`the array includes, in addition to its coupling capacitor
`to provide a driving waveform. .In my.preferred em-
`Cyi-C1,, and the touchpad TP;-TP, associated there-
`bodiment, this driving waveform is a train of substan-
`with, an associated sense amplifier 12a-12n, having an
`tially rectangular, unipolar pulses having a resting level
`input lead coupled to the junction between the coupling
`of essentially zero volts and a peak level of Eg volts. A
`capacitor and touchpad electrode of the associated sen-
`division of the driving pulse voltage amplitude occursat
`sor. The input capacitance of each of sense amplifiers
`the input of sense amplifier 12, for comparison against
`12a-12n appears as a shunt capacitance Cy1-Cpy, cou-
`the reference voltage of reference source 14, whereby
`pled between the system ground bus and the junction
`the magnitude Eo of the potential at the sense amplifier
`beween the associated touchpad electrode and coupling
`output 13¢c is indicative of the contacting of touchpad
`capacitor. The remaining inputs.of all of sense amplifi-
`ers 12a-12n are advantageously connected together to a
`electrode 11 by user personnel(indicated by closure of
`imaginary switch S, placing the user personnel body-to-
`single reference potential input 19, at which a voltage of
`ground capacitance Cr between electrical ground and
`magnitude E,.r is impressed. The. operation of each
`the junction of coupling capacitance Cy and shunt ca-
`sensor 10a-10n in the array is identical to the herein-
`above described operationofthe single sensor. It should
`pacitance C,) or the non-contacting of touchpad elec-
`trode 11 by user personnel(indicated by the open condi-
`be understood that the array may have the touchpad
`tion of imaginary switch S, whereby body-to-ground
`electrodes TP|-TP,, arranged in linear or two-dimen-
`capacitance Cris removed from the sensorcircuit).
`sional fashion, and may be of any practical size, being
`Touchpad electrode 11 is typically formed by metal-
`limited only by the ability of the driving circuitry, cou-
`lizing an area uponadielectric substrate with a quantity
`pled between input terminals.17' and 18’, to form pulses
`of a conductor or semiconductor material to form a
`across the total capacitance of the array to be driven.
`circuit node thereat. Proper operation of the sensor
`The requirements on the driving circuitry complexity
`requires that the coupling capacitance C) is very much
`are reducedbythe relatively large detectable difference
`larger than the shunt capacitance C, and that the body-
`in voltages appearing at the sense amplifier inputs in the
`to-ground capacitance Cris very much larger than the
`“touch” and “‘no-touch” conditions. Ilustratively, with
`coupling capacitance. Typically,
`the body-to-ground
`the aforementioned values of shunt, coupling and body-
`capacitance Cris about 70 picofarads, and the equiva-
`to-ground capacitances, and with a pulse amplitude Ez
`lent input capacitance of the sense amplifier appearing
`of about five volts (as available from TTL logic inte-
`as shunt capacitance Cpis about 5 picofarads, whereby
`grated circuits and the like), the sense amplifier input
`voltage E; in the “no-touch” condition is about four
`a coupling capacitance C, of about 22 picofarads may be
`utilized.
`‘
`volts while the magnitude E, of the sense amplifier
`In operation,
`in the ‘‘no-touch” condition, capaci-
`input voltage in the “touch” condition is about one volt.
`tance Cris not present in the circuit and the relatively
`It will be seen that large relative differences in the sense
`narrow pulses of the driving waveform are coupled to
`amplifier input voltage are present and easily discern-
`sense amplifier input 12a by the capacitive divider
`able by the sense amplifier, even for substantial percent-
`formed of coupling capacitance C; and shunt capaci-
`age changes in the values of coupling, shunt and body-
`tance Cy. The “no-touch” voltage amplitude E; at sense
`to-ground capacitance. Thus, reliable operation of the
`amplifier input
`lead 13a is approximately equal
`to
`individual sensors in an array is facilitated and process-
`ing variation dependence is reduced.
`(C\Ea/(Cp+C}). The magnitude E, of ‘reference
`source 14 is selected to be less than E; for the no-touch
`Referring now to FIG.3, a non-spatially-multiplexed
`condition, whereby the magnitude Eo of the voltage at
`array of touchpad sensorsis fabricated uponadielectric
`sense amplifier output 13c, is of a first condition, e.g. a
`substrate 25. The touchpad electrodes TP1,1-TP3,3 are
`fabricated of a conductive or semiconductive material
`non-zero voltage. In the “touch” condition, where ca-
`upon a surface 25a of the substrate, with the substrate
`pacitance Cy appears in parallel with shunt capacitance
`Cp, the magnitude E2 of the voltage at sense amplifier
`being subsequently positioned for exposure to the exter-
`input 13a is determined by the voltage divider formed
`nal environment, whereby user personnel may contact
`by the coupling capacitance and the paralleled C7 and
`one or more of the touchpad electrodes. In the illus-
`Cp capacitances,
`and is
`approximately equal.
`to
`trated embodiment, the nine touchpad electrodes are
`(Ea(C)))/(Cp+C1+C7). The value of C; or Cpmay be
`arranged in a 3X3 array, with each touchpad being of
`adjusted as required to assure that the magnitude E, of
`substantially square shape. and separated from there-
`the voltage at sense amplifier input 13a, in the touch
`maining touchpads. It should be understood that the
`condition, is less than the magnitude E,e of the refer-
`shape of the individual touchpadsis a matter of design,
`ence source, whereby the magnitude Eo at sense ampli-
`as is the areaof each thereof and the spacing therebe-
`fier output 13c assumesa value different from the mag-
`tween. Advantageously, as the individual touchpadsare
`nitude thereof in the “no-touch” condition, e.g. Eo is
`not required to have a capacitive value with respect to
`approximately zero volts.
`:
`other elements of the sensor array and system, in the
`Referring now to FIG.2, an array of a plurality N of
`“no-touch” condition (with the only capacitance being
`sensors 10 is formed by connecting together the cou-
`added to the system externally by a contact with a
`pling capacitor input lead, ie. that lead of coupling
`touchpad); the touchpad area can be reduced and the
`capacitor Ci, Cy2,..., Cim furthest from the associ-
`array sensor density can be increased.
`ated touchpad electrode TP), TP2,..., TP. The con-
`Each touchpadis in connection with a conductive or’
`nected coupling capacitor input leads are connected to
`semiconductive lead 27a-27i, which may be fabricated
`an array input terminal 17’, while an array common bus
`at the.same time as the associated touchpadis deposited
`15’ is coupled to anotherinput terminal 18’. Pulse gener-
`upon the substrate surface, and maybefabricated of the
`
`40
`
`350
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`7
`
`

`

`5
`same material as the touchpad electrode. Advanta-
`geously, all of the touchpads and their associated leads
`are fabricated in one simultaneous operation, such as by
`silk screening a film of a conductive material upon the
`substrate surface 25a. As will be seen, each touchpad
`electrode lead 25¢-25iis spatially separated from every
`other Jead and from al! touchpads other than the touch-
`pad to which the lead is connected. Each lead termi-
`nates in a single pad, aperture or other formation,
`knownto the printed circuitry and thelike arts, to allow
`connection of each lead to the associated coupling ca-
`pacitor and an associated sense amplifier input. In the
`itlustrated example, with nine independent touchpads,
`nine coupling capacitor-sense amplifier combinations
`are required. In very large arrays of M touchpad sen-
`sors, a total of M connections to the touchpad-elec-
`trode-bearing substrate (one connection to each of the
`M leads thereon)is required.
`The touchpad-electrode-bearing substrate may ad-
`vantageously be fabricated with the deposition of a
`shield electrode 29 covering a major portion of the area
`remaining after fabrication of the touchpads and associ-
`ated leads, but being insulated therefrom. The shield
`provides a certain degree of isolation between each
`touch pad-lead group and may, as described hereinbe-
`jow, be coupled to the sensorcircuitry to reduce effects
`of surface contamination and like, which contamination
`may be brought about by deposit of skin oil and other
`contaminants from the contacting portion of the user
`personnel onto the substrate surface and contactible
`surface areas of the touchpad electrodes. A separate
`lead 29a is provided for the shield.
`Referring now to FIG.4, a very large array of capac-
`itive sensors has a multiplicity of touchpad electrodes
`fabricated upon the surface 32a of a dielectric substrate
`32, and is arranged for spatial-multiplexing to reduce
`the total number of leads to which connection must be
`made at the substrate. The spatially-multiplexed array
`of touchpad electrodes is fabricated as a two-dimen-
`sional matrix having J columns and K rows, with an
`additional column of K touchpads for enabling a row-
`select function. Thus, an array having M individual
`selectable functions, where M=JxK, has a touchpad
`array of Kx (J=1) touchpads. Illustratively, for an
`array wherein M=9, J=3 and K=3,a total of 12 touch-
`padsare utilized. The three touchpads TP.,, TPs,,, and
`TP,, are not spatially multiplexed, due to their use as
`row selectors, and are each arranged one above the
`other on the substrate surface, with individual leads 35a,
`35d and 35c being integrally connected to the associated
`row-select touchpad and separate from all other touch-
`pads and interconnection leads. The remaining plurality
`(JK) of touchpads are arranged with J touchpads in
`each of the K rows and with connective leadsintegrally
`formed between each of the touchpads in a column and
`extending beyond oneof the end touchpad electrodesin
`the column to form a lead for all of the K touchpads in
`that column to the remainder of the sensor circuitry
`associated with each column. Thus, touchpads TPi,1,
`TP2,; and TP3; of column 1 of the array, are intercon-
`nected by lead portion 37a (between touchpad elec-
`trode TP),; and TP21) and lead portion 376 (between
`touchpad electrode TP2,; and TP3,1) with an additional
`lead portion 37c extending from an edge of touchpad
`electrode TP3,1 opposite the remainder of the touchpad
`electrodes in that column, to provide a lead for connec-
`tion to the single coupling capacitor and single sense
`amplifier for the touchpad column 1 sensor. Similarly,
`
`— 5
`
`25
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`65
`
`4,237,421
`
`6
`electrode interconnective and lead portions 38a, 38)
`and 38c are utilized to interconnect
`the touchpads
`TP1,2, TP2,2, and TP3,2, forming column 2, while inter-
`connective and lead portions 39a, 395 and 39c are uti-
`lized to connect touchpad electrodes TPi,3, TP2,3, and
`TP3,3 to form the J=3 columnfurthest from the column
`of row-select touchpad electrodes. It should be under-
`stood that the spatially-multiplexed touchpad sensor
`array maybe utilized with or withouta shield electrode,
`and the spatially-multiplexed array of FIG. 4 is, for
`purposesofillustration, shown without the presence of
`the shield.
`Thespatially-multiplexed array of sensors is operated
`by user personnel initially contacting that one of row-
`select touchpads TP,,-TP,to designate that one of
`rows 1-K in which the desired touchpadis found.Iius-
`tratively, if the input function requires that data associ-
`ated with touchpad TP3,2 be input to a system to which
`the touchpad sensor array is coupled, the row-select
`touchpad TP,,; is initially contacted to select the K=3
`(bottom) row, and then the individual touchpad elec-
`trode along that row e.g. touchpad electrode TP3, (in
`column 2), is contacted to complete the input function.
`It should be understood that suitable storage means,
`such as logic latches and the like, and logic gating
`means (not shown), such as are knownto the art, are
`utilized to: store the output of one ofthe sense amplifi-
`ers associated with the row-select portion of the array;
`store the output of one of the sense amplifiers coupled
`to a particular column (with one sense amplifier being
`coupled to each individual one of the columnleads 37c,
`38c or 39c); and logically detect the presence ofa partic-
`ular column and row signal from the storage means to
`determine which element of the matrix has been en-
`tered. It should also be understood that the use of non-
`spatially-multiplexed row-select sensors with a spatial-
`ly-multiplexed column-connected sensor array allows
`the number of connections to substrate 32 to be mini-
`mized relative to the non-spatially-multiplexed sensor
`array of FIG.3, e.g. for a nine-element array, the spa-
`tially-multiplexed embodiment (FIG. 4) requires only
`six contacts, while the non-spatially-multiplexed em-
`bodiment requires nine contacts. It will be seen that
`even greater reduction of substrate connections occur
`for large arrays, e.g. for a ten by ten array (100 ele-
`ments), the non-spatially-multiplexed array requires 100
`individual connections, while the spatially-multiplexed
`array requires only 20 connections.
`Referring now to FIGS.5 and 6, reliable operation
`with relatively low drive voltages is further assured by
`incorporating a noval level clamping networkinto each
`sensor 50 of an array. It should be understood that the
`touchpad electrode TP, shown for the level-clamped
`capacitor touchpad sensor 50, may be a single touchpad
`electrode, in a non-spatially-multiplexed array, or may
`be any one of a plurality of touchpad electrode areas
`connected together to form one column (or row) of a
`spatially-muitiplexed array. The clamped sensor 50
`contains, in addition to touchpad. electrode TP (andits
`imaginary switch S representing the contact or non-
`contact of the body-to-ground capacitance Cr thereto),
`a sense amplifier 52 having one input 53a thereof cou-
`pled to 2 common node 51’ and having a remaining
`input 535 coupled to a source of reference potential of
`magnitude Eye. A capacitance Cp is connected between
`the touchpad-sense amplifier input junction and a sensor
`ground bus 55; the shunt capacitance Cp may be the
`equivalent input capacitance of the sensor amplifier,
`
`8
`
`

`

`4,237,421
`
`_0
`
`— 5
`
`40
`
`45
`
`7
`either alone or in parallel with an additional physical
`capacitance.
`A pair of electrical resistances Ri and Roare series
`connected between a sensor input terminal 57 and a
`common terminal 58, coupled to a commonbus 55. A
`driving waveform, comprised of a train of unipolar
`pulses having a resting amplitude of approximately zero
`volts and a peak amplitude of Eg; volts, with a predeter-
`mined pulse width Ty, is applied between input termi-
`nals 57 and 58. Thé values of resistances Ri and R2 are
`selected to provide a Thevenin equivalent source hav-
`ing an output voltage Eg. and having a very low source
`impedance equal to the parallel combination of Ry and
`Ro. Anotherelectrical resistance R3 is coupled from the
`junction of resistance R; and R2 to the touchpad elec-
`trode TP. Coupling capacitor C, is connected between
`sensor driven input terminal 57 and node 51; node 51 is
`also connected to the anode of a diode Dj, having its ©
`cathode coupled to the junction of resistance R3 and the
`touchpad electrode TP. A resistance Ry of relatively
`high value is coupled across diode Dj.
`In operation, the Thevenin equivalent voltage Ego is
`predeterminately selected, by choice of suitable values
`for resistances R; and Ro, to be greater than the refer-
`ence voltage E,r applied to sense amplifier lead 535.
`Commencing with the rising edge 60a of the input pulse
`(FIG. 6, waveform A) the voltage E;, (between sense
`amplifier input lead 532 and sensor ground) instanta-
`neously rises to a value Ej1=Da(Egi—Vp1)+ Voi,
`where Ky is
`the
`“no-touch”
`capacitance
`ratio
`(CiA(C1+C,)) and Vp}is the “on” voltage across diode
`D}. This instantaneous rise of the sense amplifier input
`waveform (FIG. 6, waveform B) is shown as edge 62.
`The amplitude E,,1 is selected to be greater than the
`steady state Thevenin equivalent voltage Eg2, which is
`itself greater than the reference voltage.
`The output voltage of sense amplifier 52 is latched at
`a time t, following the leading edge 60a of drive pulse
`Egl when an enable signal arrives on line 54. The time
`te should be about one time constant 7 of the clamped
`sensor circuit in the “no-touch” condition, and should
`also be muchless than the time constantof the circuit in
`the “touch” condition, in which condition the circuit
`includes resistance tending to charge capacitor C1 such
`that Ej, asymptotically approaches Ego. The drive pulse
`width t, of Eg; must therefore be greater than te. Thus,
`the input voltage Ey, is greater than the Thevenin volt-
`age Eg) and always greater than the reference voltage
`Eve to assure that the amplifier output 53c is “off” and
`the no-touch condition is reliably indicated by the state
`of the sense amplifier output voltage Ep.
`In the “touch” condition, the sense amplifier input
`voltage Ey, assumes an initial value of Ejy.2=K-
`AEgi—Vpi)+Vn1 where Kr=(Ci/(Ci+Cp+C,).
`The touch constant Kvis selected such that the voltage
`Ejn2 is always less than both the Thevenin voltage Eg2
`and the reference voltage Eyes, prior to enablement of
`the sense amplifier latch, whereby the differential sense
`amplifier input voltage (EryK—Ejn2) is reliably de-
`tected by the sense amplifier to enable another condi-
`tion of output voltage E,, indicative of the “touch”
`condition, at sense amplifier output 53c.
`Diode D; prevents the sensor node voltage E,, from
`charging to the reference level Ego prior to enablement
`of sense amplifier 52 and the comparatoraction thereof
`during touch conditions. Resistance Ry acts to discharge
`coupling capacitor Ci during the interval between driv-
`ing pulses, i.e. when the input pulse level is essentially
`
`35
`
`60
`
`6s
`
`8
`equal to zero volts; resistance R4 is selected such that
`the time constants ofresistance R4 and coupling capaci-
`tor Cy is much greater than the driving voltage pulse
`width ty, but much less than the cycle time of the drive
`signal Es}, whose duty cycleis relatively low, e.g. a
`duty cycle of about 0.001.
`Referring now to FIG. 7, minimization of surface
`contamination effects and cross-talk with an array of
`touchpads is provided by isolating each touchpad and
`lead thereof by the aforementioned conductive shield,
`preferably formed ofa thin film of a conductive mate-
`rial, such as indium tin oxide and the like. Advanta-
`geously, the shield has a very low circuit impedance to
`provide the desired reduction in cross-talk, i.e. touch-
`pad-to-touchpad coupling. In the event of surface con-
`tamination, the shield current I, is a non-zero value,
`generated by the
`contamination current
`flowing
`through the low circuit impedance. The shield contami-
`nation current is conducted to sensor circuit 50’ via
`shield lead 29a.
`Sensor circuit 50’, wherein like reference designa-
`tionsare utilized, with respect to FIG.5, for like func-
`tions, also includes a diode D2 havingits anode coupled
`to the junction of resistance Rj and R3, and havingits
`cathode coupled to resistance R2. A PNP transister Q
`has its base electrode coupled to the junction between
`the cathode of diode D2 and resistance R2; the emitter
`electrode of transistor Q is connected to shield lead 29a
`‘and is also connected to sensorcircuit input terminal 57
`via an emitter resistance R51, while the collector of
`transistor Q is connected to the anode of a detector
`diode D3 and is also connected to common bus 55 via a
`series circuit including a collector resistance Rg and a
`diode Daz. The cathode of the detector diode is coupled
`to a diode detector load consisting of a capacitor C2 and
`a resistance R7, both of which have their remaining
`terminals coupled to common bus 55. The inverting (—)
`input 70a of a second sense amplifier (comparator) 72 is
`coupled to the junction between the detector diode
`cathode, capacitor C2 and resistor R7. The non-invert-
`ing input 706 of the sense amplifier is connected to a
`source of a second reference voltage E,.j2. The sense
`amplifier output 70c provides a signal Ex, indicative of
`the comparison of shield contamination current against
`a reference voltage (E;¢7).
`In operation, prior to the first driving pulse of ampli-
`tude Egi, the potential difference between input termi-
`nals 57 and 58 is essentially zero and transistor Q is
`cut-off, whereby a current of substantially zero magni-
`tude flows through collector resistance Rg and diode
`D4. The collector resistance voltage drop is thus ap-
`proximately zero and the detector capacitance Cz is
`charged to substantially zero volts. The detector load
`capacitance voltage appears at sense amplifier input 702
`and is less than the magnitude E,p of the reference
`voltage at the remaining comparator input lead 705,
`whereby the sense amplifier output 70¢ is in a first con-
`dition indicative of shield current being less than the
`limit established by the magnitude E,ep.
`Upon occurrence ofthe first driving pulse, the volt-
`age at input terminal 57 rises to a magnitude Eg) and the
`base electrode of transistor Q receives a voltage of
`magnitude (((Egi—Eg2)Ra(R1 +R2))—R2), where Eq is
`the voltage drop across diode D2. The value ofresis-
`tance R5 is selected such that the emitterbase diode of
`the transistor is forward biased and emitter current is
`injected into the emitter electrode of the transistor. The
`magnitude of the total emitter electrode current is the
`
`,
`
`9
`
`

`

`4,237,421
`
`_ 0
`
`9
`sum ofthe shield current (received via lead 29a) and the
`current injected by resistance Rs, due to the difference
`in potential
`thereacross. The summed currents flow
`from the transistor collector electrode and through
`resistance Rg and diode D4 to ground wherebya voltage
`drop exists thereacross, which voltage is the sum of a
`steady voltage due to the current injected by action of
`emitter resistance R5 and a voltage dueto the injection
`of the shield current. As increasing values of shield
`currentare injected into the emitter of the transister, the
`voltage at the anode of detector D3rises. The increase
`in the voltage further forward-biases detector diode D3
`and causes additional current to be injected into capaci-
`tance Cy to increase the voltage thereacross, at the in-
`verting input 70¢ of the shield sense amplifier. During
`the time intervals between driving pulses, the voltage
`across collector resistance R¢ falls substantially to zero,
`whereby the cathode of detector cathode D3 is at a
`higher potential than the anodethereof, and the diode is
`cut-off. Detector load resistance R7 is of a reasonably
`high resistance value, whereby the decay of the voltage
`across capacitance C2is relatively slight between driv-
`ing pulses, but still decays to zero if the

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket