throbber
THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
`© 1984 by The American Society of Biological Chemists, Inc.
`
`Vol. 259, No. 6, Issue of March 25, pp. 3620-3624, 1984
`Printed in U.S.A,
`
`Iron-catalyzed Hydroxy] Radical Formation
`STRINGENT REQUIREMENT FOR FREE IRON COORDINATIONSITE*
`
`Ernst Graft§, John R. Mahoney, Robert G. Bryant|| **, and John W. Eatoni +} §§
`From the {Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, ||Chemistry, and t{Medicine, University of Minnesota,
`Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
`
`(Received for publication, August 8, 1983)
`
`The rapid and nonspecific reactivity of OH renders this
`free radical particularly dangerous. It may abstract hydrogen
`from, or hydroxylate, most biomolecules, causing cell injury
`or death. Hydroxyl radical is believed to be the etiological
`agent for several diseases and mayalso be involvedin natural
`aging.
`Underphysiological conditions,ironis only slightly soluble,
`tending to form precipitates with anions such as OH™ and
`inorganic phosphate. However, a variety of chelating agents
`greatly increase the solubility of iron. For example, the addi-
`tion of EDTA to an 03-generating system in the presence of
`Fe** markedly potentiates cytotoxicity (4), OH formation (4,
`7), and lipid peroxidation (8), presumably by increasing the
`effective concentration of Fe** at neutral pH. Similarly, ADP
`and ATP form iron chelates of high catalytic activity (9, 10).
`However, the powerful iron chelators DTPA and Desferal
`(desferrioxamine B methanesulfonate) totally inactivate Fe**
`for previously unexplained reasons(4, 8).
`We have investigated the chemical basis for the different
`behavior of iron chelates with respect to radical formation.
`Recognizing the importance of aquosites in transition metal
`catalysis (11) and the crucial role of heme-associated water
`in spontaneous hemoglobin oxidation (12), we postulated that
`ÿ 
`for catalytic activity, iron requires at least one coordination
`ÿ 
`site that is open or occupied by a readily dissociable ligand
`ÿ
`such as water or azide. We tested this hypothesis by deter-
` ÿ
`
`mining coordinated water in a number of disparate iron
`
`chelates spectroscopically and by measuring their catalytic
`ÿ
`activity in the formation of OH using an enzymatic O3-
`
ÿ
`generating system.
`
`
`
`8107‘ZZJsnBnyUojsonsAq/S10°9q['MMM//:dy)yWOYpopeojuMog
`
`EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
`
`Materials
`
`Materials were purchased from the following sources: acetylace-
`tone, ADP, ATP, dimethyl sulfoxide, DTPA, EDTA, EGTA, EHPG,
`hypoxanthine, sodium ascorbate, sodium azide, sodium phytate, and
`xanthine oxidase from Sigma; 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid and nitrilo-
`triacetic acid from Aldrich; FeSO, and FeCl,-6H,0 from J. T. Baker
`Chemical Co.; H,O, from Mallinckrodt Chemical Works; Desferal
`from Ciba Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and bleomycin from Bristol Labo-
`ratories. All other chemicals used were of analytical grade.
`
`Hydroxyl Radical Formation
`
`Hypoxanthine-xanthine Oxidase System—O} was generated by hy-
`poxanthine and xanthine oxidase. The formation of OH was moni-
`tored by reaction with dimethyl sulfoxide which yields formaldehyde
`(13, 14). Triplicate 1.0-ml samples of 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 50 um Fe™,
`500 uM chelator, 50 mm dimethyl sulfoxide, 300 uM hypoxanthine,
`and 18 milliunits of xanthine oxidase were incubated at 37 °C for 30
`min. The reaction was initiated by the addition of the enzyme and
`terminated with 50 yl of 100% trichloroacetic acid. The blanks were
`incubated in the absence of enzyme and stopped with trichloroacetic
`acid, followed by the addition of xanthine oxidase. Formaldehyde was
`
`3620
`
`MAIA Exhibit 1045
`
`IPR PETITION
`
`MAIA V. BRACCO
`
`  
` ÿÿ
`
`
`
`The catalysis by iron of the formation of reactive
`oxygen species in biological systems has been well
`documented. In this present study, we have investi-
`gated the hypothesis that iron-catalyzed formation of
`hydroxyl radical (OH) from superoxide anion radical
`(03) and H2Q, requires the availability of at least one
`iron coordination site that is open or occupied by a
`readily dissociable ligand such as water. This hypoth-
`esis was tested by measuring the catalytic activity of
`12 different iron chelates using hypoxanthine and xan-
`thine oxidase to generate 03. In these same chelates,
`we also determined the presence or absence of coordi-
`nated water by UV-visible spectroscopy and 1H NMR
`relaxation measurements. Of all chelates tested, only
`Fe** coordinated to diethylenetriamine pentaacetic
`acid; ethylenediamine di(o-hydroxyphenylacetic acid),
`phytate, and Desferal lacked coordination water; and
`only these four complexes failed to produce hydroxyl
`radical. Separate determinations of the two redoxhalf-
`reactions involved(i.e. Fe** + 0; — Fe** + Oz and Fe**
`+ H.02 — Fe** + ‘OH + OH’)indicate that an available
`coordination site is necessary for the latter (Fenton)
`reaction. This principle governing iron reactivity may
`help advance our understanding of the mechanism of
`oxidative damage in biological systems and may also
`permit the design of more effective chelators for the
`control of iron in biological systems.
`
`Stimulated phagocytes produce large quantities of O7'
`which promote the destruction of ingested microorganisms
`(1) and of erythrocyte targets in a model system (2). OH has
`been implicated as a derivative toxic species (3, 4), and the
`mechanism of iron-catalyzed OH formation has been well
`established (5, 6).
`
`O3 + Fe** — Fe** + 0;
`
`H;02 + Fe** + Fe** + ‘OH + OH-
`
`* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by
`the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby
`marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734
`solely to indicate this fact.
`§ Supported by National Institutes of Health Grants HL-16833
`and AI-18823.
`1] Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HL-16833.
`** Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM-29428
`and National Science Foundation Grant PCM-8106054.
`§§ Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HL-16833.
`Recipient of a National Institutes of Health Research Career Devel-
`opment Award.
`1The abbreviations used are: 03, superoxide anion radical; OH,
`hydroxy] radical; DTPA, diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid; EGTA,
`ethylene glycol bis(S-aminoethy! ether)-N,N,N’ ,N’-tetraacetic acid;
`CDTA,
`trans-1,2-diaminocyclohexane-N,N,N',N’-tetraacetic acid;
`EHPG, ethylenediamine di(o-hydroxyphenylacetic acid).
`
`
`
`
`MAIA Exhibit 1045
`MAIA V. BRACCO
`IPR PETITION
`
`

`

`Free Coordination Sites and Iron Reactivity
`
`cat1
`
`3621
`
`Os
`
`3 o4
`
`; 03o2
`
`0.
`0
`
`350
`
`500
`
`450
`400
`Wavelength (nm)
`Fic. 1. Effect of azide on visible absorption of Fe**-EDTA.
`Solutions of 0.3 mm Fe**, 5.0 mm EDTA, 50 mm Tris, pH 7.4,
`containing increasing amounts of NaN; (50, 100, 200, 500, 1000, 1500
`mM)were scanned versus Fe**-EDTA in Tris, pH 7.4.
`
`ge
`T —— +
`r
`
`
`
` ÿÿ
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8107‘ZZIsNBNYUOyson3Aq/S10'0qfMMM//:d}}YWoOpopeojuMog
`
`ÿ ÿ
`ÿ ÿ
`
` ÿ
ÿ 
`
`  
`
`(NzJ(m)
`Fic. 2. Azide dependence of absorption intensity of N3-
`Fe*+. EDTA. Experimental conditions were the same as in Fig. 1.
`All absorption readings were corrected for the minor contribution of
`azide alone. The curve shown is a computer-generated binding iso-
`therm (Equation 1) using the parameters obtained from the double
`reciprocal plot shown in the inset.
`
`ment between experimentaland theoretical binding isotherms
`supports the assumption that the only equilibrium in consid-
`eration is that between Nj and Fe**-EDTA.Theaffinity of
`N; for Fe** is too low to displace any EDTA based on both
`theoretical considerations and on the observations that 1) no
`N;- Fe** precipitate could be detected even after several days,
`2) all of the above spectral properties were independent of
`EDTAconcentration, and 3) no spectral change was observed
`upon the addition of azide to other iron chelates of similar
`Fe**-chelator association constants containing no aquo coor-
`dinationsite.
`This spectroscopic method permits ready determination of
`the presence offirst coordination sphere water in a number
`of different Fe**-chelates. Table I demonstrates thatall but
`four chelates contained at least one coordinated water mole-
`cule. The maximum wavelength, the extinction coefficient of
`the complex, and the association constant between Nz and
`Fe**-chelates are highly variable and depend on the type of
`bonding between Fe** and chelator, the stereochemistry of
`the complex, and the numberof coordination positions. A
`complete interpretation of these spectral data, however, is
`beyond the scope of the present study. A spectroscopictitra-
`tion of Nz with Fe** - nitrilotriacetic acid similar to that shown
`in Fig. 2 revealed an extinction coefficient of 4257 cm™' m7!
`and an association constant of 2.49 M~!. No biphasic character
`of the binding isotherm was observed, suggesting the presence
`of only one watersite.
`Theability of the optical spectroscopic method to determine
`the presence of coordinated water was confirmed by nuclear
`
`determined colorimetrically by the Hantzsch reaction (15). Equal
`volumes of the above trichloroacetic acid extracts and of a solution
`containing 50 mM acetic acid, 20 mM acetylacetone, and 2 M ammo-
`nium acetate were incubated at 37 °C for 40 min in the dark, and the
`absorption of the resultant diacetyldihydrolutidine was measured at
`412 nm. Exact timing and dimming of lights during spectrophoto-
`metric assay were very important due to the instability and light
`sensitivity of diacetyldihydrolutidine.
`Fe**-Ascorbate System—Triplicate samples of 2 mM ascorbate, 167
`uM Fe**, 50 mM dimethyl sulfoxide, 2.0 mM chelator, 50 mM Tris, pH
`7.4, were incubated at 37°C for 30 min, and formaldehyde was
`determined by the Hantzsch reaction as described above.
`
`Decomposition of HsOz
`Triplicate 1.0-ml samples of 0.3 mM Fe**, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.1 mm
`H.02, 100 mM NaN, and 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, were incubated at
`37 °C for 10 min. Hydrogen peroxide was determined colorimetrically
`by the iodine-starch method (16). Hydroxy] radical generation could
`not be measured dueto the interference by Nz, a good OH scavenger
`(17).
`
`'H NMRRelaxation
`
`1H NMR relaxation measurements were conducted using a spe-
`cially constructed field cycling nuclear magnetic relaxation spectrom-
`eter described previously (18). In the present determinations, the
`measure field was 7.25 MHz, and the probe was of the Helmholtz
`single coil design. Each relaxation rate is the result of at least 30
`measurements on the decay curve. Samples were placed in 10-mm
`Pyrex culture tubes and thermostated at 286.8 K with liquid Freon
`via a Neslab RTE-8 refrigerated heat exchanger. 'The rf source was a
`crystal oscillator gated by Vari-L SS-30 gates, amplified by an ENI
`10-watt broad band amplifier. The receiver consisted of a Mitek
`preamplifier, a cascade of Avantek UTO-500 series amplifiers oper-
`ating into a Merrimac doubly balanced mixer. The 250-kHz inter-
`mediate frequency was detected using an absolute valve detector. A
`two-pulse sequence was used at the measure field to generate a spin
`echo, the amplitude of which was captured using a sample and hold
`circuit read by an IBM 7406 device coupler. The experiment was
`controlled by an IBM 5120 computer.
`
`UV-visible Spectroscopy
`All spectroscopic scans were recorded on a Beckman DU-8 spec-
`trophotometer at a scan speed of 100 nm/min. Therate of oxidation
`of Fe?* and Fe**-chelates was followed by recording the increase in
`absorption at 310 nm (Fe**), 328 nm (Fe?*.-EDTA), and 355 nm
`(Fe**. DTPA) every 12 s following the addition of Fe’* to 50 mm Tris,
`pH7.4, or Tris, 0.6 mM chelator.
`
`RESULTS
`
`As mentioned earlier, chelation of Fe** by EDTA greatly
`enhances iron-driven ‘OH generation. This may appear puz-
`zling because EDTA formsa hexadentate chelate with Fe**.
`However, it is known that the structure of the Fe**-EDTA
`complex includes a seventh coordination site occupied by
`water (19). This coordination water may be competitively
`displaced by a ligand such as N3. As shown in Fig. 1,
`Nz - Fe**- EDTAdisplays an absorption peak at approximately
`409 nm which is absent in H,O-Fe**-EDTA. This spectral
`property may be employed to quantitate the interaction be-
`tween Nz and Fe**.EDTA.Fig. 2 shows a binding isotherm,
`wherein the open circles represent the actual data points, and
`the solid line was calculated using Equation 1.
`
`AXE! x (A x E7'- 0.3 x 107% - kK")
`AxE™"-0.3 x 107%
`
`[Ns] =
`
`(1)
`
`where [N;] = total azide concentration (molar), A = absorp-
`tion at 409 nm, E = extinction coefficient of N3z-Fe**.
`EDTA at 409 nm, and K = association constant for Nz and
`Fe**.EDTA.
`The values for the parameters K and E were determined to
`be 0.61 m7! and 3171 cm7! mM“, respectively, from the double
`reciprocal plot shown by the inset in Fig. 2. The good agree-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`3622
`
`Free Coordination Sites and Iron Reactivity
`
`TABLE |
`
`Catalytic and spectroscopic correlation of various Fe**-chelates
`oa
`log K, of
`Adide-induced spectral
`iron chela-
`_....,.
`.
`shift
`tor
`Catalyticactivity
`Chelator
`
`Maximum Absorption
`Fe**
`Fe**
`
`nm
`
`TABLE II
`'H nuclear relaxation rates at 0.01 MHzfor several iron(II)
`
`complexes
`
`ee
`
`Complex*
`
`YT,
`=
`7.2
`Fe(III)-EDTA
`5.7
`Fe(III): EDTA + Nz
`4.0
`Fe(III): DTPA
`4.0
`Fe(III). DTPA + Nz
`10.5
`Fe(III)-ATP
`5.5
`Fe(III)- ATP + Ng
`6.9
`Fe(III) - Desferal
`
`71
`Fe(III) -Desferal + Ny
`* All complexes contained 2.0 mm Fe** and 5.0 mM chelating agent
`in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4. The azide ion concentration was 1000 mm.
`
`4 4
`
`4
`
`ee
`
`wi
`
`|
`26-
`
`t
`
`None
`EDTA
`EGTA
`NTA?
`CDTA
`Phytate
`EHPG
`DTPA
`Desferal
`ADP
`
`ATP
`
`Bleomycin
`DHBA
`
`nmols HCHO/
`30 min
`81.1414
`16.1 + 0.3
`10.4 + 0.5
`23.8 + 0.3
`10.4+0.1
`0.0
`0.0
`0.0
`0.0
`63.2 + 1.0
`
`409
`456
`404
`371
`Noshift
`Noshift
`No shift
`Noshift
`347
`426
`340
`443
`356
`22.1 + 0.7
`400
`69.5+ 1.9
`
`490
`
`11.9 + 0.8
`
`0.391
`0.619
`0.945
`0.453
`
`14.3° 25.0°
`11.8° 20,5°
`8.3°
`15.9°
`18.9° 30.0°
`
`14.3° 33.9°
`16.4° 28.0°
`30.7°
`
`21.4
`
`0.940
`0.842
`0.855
`0.789
`0.471
`0.260
`0.314
`
`* The formation of ‘OH in the presence of 50 uM Fe** and 500 um
`chelator was determined by the xanthine oxidase method as described
`under “Experimental Procedures.”
`> The peak positions and their absorption intensity were obtained
`from differential spectroscopic scansof 0.3 mM Fe**, 5.0 mM chelator,
`1.0 M NaNs, 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, versus the same solution minus
`azide.
`‘From Martell and Smith (23).
`4 NTA,nitrilotriacetic acid; DHBA,2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid.
`* From Crumblisset al. (24).
`‘From Martell and Smith (25).
`
`
`
`
`(s)mB
`
`
`
`
` oRELAXATIONRATE,st
`
`
`
`
`ooa“T_T.TT11
`
`
`8107‘TZISNBNYUOyson3Aq/S10'0qfMMM//:dyYWoOpopeopuUMog
`
` ÿÿ
`
`1.1_
`
`
`Lo
`
`  
`
`ÿ 
`ÿ
`ÿ
`
`3 8
`ÿ
`
`
` ÿ
ÿ 
`
`2
`
`i
`2
`
`tt
`
`|
`
`2
`
`_t@TOTOT
`
`HCHOProduction{nmoles) ——o__
`
`
`
`°h
`
`22
`
`[chelator] / [Fe°*]
`Fic. 4, Effect of chelator/iron ratio on hydroxyl radical
`formation. The assay was performed using 300 uM hypoxanthine,
`18 milliunits of xanthine oxidase, and 50 um Fe** as described under
`“Experimental Procedures.” Each point represents the mean and
`standard deviation of three determinations. Solid symbols are EDTA/
`Fe**-chelate and open symbols represent phytate/Fe**-chelate.
`
`
` id 10
`
`FREQUENCY, MHz
`Fic. 3. The ’H nuclear magnetic relaxation rates for 20 mM
`Fe**.5.0 mm EDTA complex at pH 7.4 in the presence (@) and
`absence (A) of 1000 mm N; measured at 286.8 K as a function
`of magnetic field strength plotted as the ‘H Larmorfrequency.
`
`magnetic relaxation which is also sensitive to water partici-
`pation in the first coordination sphere of paramagnetic ions
`such as Fe(III). It is clear both from the frequency dependence
`(Fig. 3) and the data in Table II that the addition of azide ion
`decreases the 'H relaxation rate only for those complexes
`where dramatic changesin the optical spectrum are observed
`on the addition of azide ion.
`Analysis of the capability of all these Fe*t complexes to
`catalyze the formation of ‘OH from O03 and H,O, demon-
`strates a direct relationship between the presenceofa first
`coordination sphere water molecule on Fe** and the catalytic
`activity of the complex (Table I). Virtually identical results
`
`were obtained with the Fe**-ascorbate system. Thus, spectro-
`scopic determination of azide binding is a simple andreliable
`method for predicting the oxidative reactivity of a particular
`Fe**-chelate. In contrast, the correlation between the associ-
`ation constantfor chelating agent with iron(IID) and catalytic
`reactivity of the chelate is very poor (Table I).
`The effect of the EDTA/Fe** ratio on ‘OH formation
`demonstrates the relative reactivities of Fe(H.O)3* and H.0-
`Fe**.EDTA (Fig. 4). Freshly prepared Fe(H.O)%* is very
`soluble and, as expected, a superior redox catalyst. Upon
`titration with EDTA, the activity decreases down to the
`equivalence point and,
`thereafter,
`is independent of the
`EDTA/Fe™*ratio. At the sametime, the extinction coefficient
`of Nz-Fe**-EDTA at 409 nm remains constant between
`EDTA/Fe*ratios of 1 to 20 (data not shown). Unlike H.O-
`Fe**.EDTA, mono-, di-, tri-, and tetraferric phytate lack
`available aquo coordination sites as determined spectroscop-
`ically and, indeed, produce no ‘OHatanyratio (Fig. 4).
`To investigate further the role of aquo coordination sites
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Free Coordination Sites and Iron Reactivity
`
`3623
`
`in iron catalysis of OH production, we measured the spon-
`taneous oxidation rates of Fe** and Fe**-chelates (Fig. 5).
`Although DTPA blocked iron-driven ‘OH formation, this
`chelator only slowed, but did not prevent, oxidation of Fe**
`to Fe’. The oxidation of Fe?t.DTPA followed first order
`kinetics with a t,, of 525 s, which wasonly slightly lower than
`that of Fe** alone (t, = 151s). The addition of EDTA to Fe**
`accelerated Fe** formation (t, = 16 s), and the reaction
`approached second order kinetics due to the rapid oxygen
`consumption. As expected, the oxidation rates of H.0-Fe*.
`EDTAand N;-Fe?*.EDTA were found to be identical. Also,
`100 mm Nzhad noeffect on the decomposition of H,O2 by
`Fe*t. EDTA, since both water and azide should be readily
`displaceable by HO, from the iron coordinationsite.
`DISCUSSION
`
` 05
`
`REFERENCES
`
`One
`
`* E. Graf, J. R. Mahoney, and J. W. Eaton (1984) Science (Wash.
`D. C.), submitted for publication.
`
`!
`1000
`
`oa
`
`Fe
`eEDTA
`
`03
`
`==
`
`2 02
`Ol
`
`0
`
`_
`200
`
`0
`
`.
`600
`Time (s)
`Fic. 5. Oxidation rate of Fe** and Fe?*-chelates. The oxida-
`tion of Fe** to Fe** was followed spectrophotometrically at 25 °C as
`described under “Experimenta] Procedures.” Thesolutions contained
`0.5 mM Fe**, 0.6 mM chelator, 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4. The reactions
`were initiated by the addition of Fe.
`
`the insolubility of iron in phosphate buffers and suggests that
`the latter should not be used to assess iron-mediated OH
`generation.
`important
`The observations reported here have several
`implications. For example, in view of the facilitation of iron-
`mediated ‘OH generation by iron-EDTAchelates,it might be
`wise to reconsider the use of EDTA as a preservative of
`enzymes, resins, and food items. EDTA might be replaced
`with phytate, a stable and abundant polyphosphate which
`comprises 1-6% by weightofall plant seeds. Its main function
`in seeds is believed to be protection against oxidative damage
`during storage.? Indeed, as shown herein, the iron-phytate
`chelate is totally inert in the Fenton reaction. We have
`successfully applied this property to the preservation of fresh
`fruits and vegetables.” A multitude of other applications based
`on this antioxidant property of phytic acid have been sum-
`marized in a recent review (21).
`The above results demonstrate that in free iron and iron
`Of equal importance are the medical applications of our
`chelates, the availability of at least one coordination site is
`results. A numberof drugs are strong iron-chelating agents,
`required for catalysis of ‘OH generation. Iron catalysis of
`and their potential for catalyzing ‘OH production mayeasily
`‘OH formation from O3 and HQ, consists of two half-reac-
`be predicted by the spectroscopic methods reported herein.
`tions: the reduction of Fe** by 03, and the oxidation of Fe**
`One example is the natural antibiotic bleomycin whose chem-
`by H,0,. The availability of a coordination site thatis free or
`istry, biochemistry, and clinical effectiveness have been re-
`occupied by an easily displaceable ligand such as water facil-
`viewed extensively (22). Fe*t-bleomycin possesses an iron-
`itates the first half-reaction, yet it is not a stringent require-
`coordinated water molecule and is a good catalyst for ‘OH
`ment, as demonstrated by the differential oxidation rates of
`formation (Table I). This property of the iron-bleomycin
`Fe**.EDTA and Fe**-DTPA by O2. However, occupation of
`chelate may help explain the well known pulmonary toxicity
`all iron coordination sites by a chelator with displacement of
`of bleomycin. In contrast, the clinically useful iron chelator
`water in the first coordination sphere precludes the binding
`Desferal does not accelerate iron-driven oxidation and may
`of HO, to Fe’*-chelates and the subsequent Fenton reaction.
`
`actually suppress such reactions in vivo.
`Thus, chelation of iron by DTPA, phytate, EHPG, or Desferal
`
`In summary, our results support the idea that chelates in
`excludes iron-associated water and uncouples the oxidation
`which a coordination site on iron remains open (or loosely
`of Fe?* from the formation of ‘OH.
`associated with ligands such as water) are efficient catalysts
`In the absence of chelating agents, Fe(H.0)%* rapidly cat-
`of ‘OH generation. Hindranceofall coordination sites on iron
`alyzes the formation of ‘OH. However, Fe(H2O)%* aggregates
`effectively blocks OH production, although other redox prop-
`slowly as oxygen-bridged polynuclear complexes that precip-
`erties of the chelated iron are evidently not greatly modified.
`itate. At physiological pH, the concentration of free iron at
`Should this general principle hold true for all iron chelates
`equilibrium is estimated to be 10~** M (20). Thus, under most
`(and, perhaps, chelates of other transition metals),
`it will
`circumstances, EDTA appearsto raise iron reactivity by in-
`provide a valuable basis for prediction of the behavior of iron
`creasing the available iron concentration, even though catal-
`complexes and for the design of novel chelators.
`ysis by soluble hexaaquoiron(III) ions is more efficient than
`
`ÿ
`that by H,0-Fe**.EDTA. These results contradict earlier
`reports of very low lipid peroxidation and ‘OH formation by
`
ÿ
`iron in the absence of EDTA,followed by an increase concom-
`. Rosen, H. & Klebanoff, S. J. (1979) J. Exp. Med. 149, 27-39
` 
`. Weiss, S. J. (1980) #. Biol. Chem. 255, 9912-9917
`itant with the addition of EDTA (8). However, those earlier
`
`. Repine, J. E., Eaton, J. W., Anders, M. W., Hoidal, J. R. & Fox,
`assays were carried out in phosphate buffer, which immedi-
`R. B. (1979) J. Clin. Invest. 64, 1642-1651
`ately precipitates Fe*t. We have noticed that the release of
`4. Rosen, H. & Klebanoff, S. J. (1981) Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
`50% of Fe** from 167 uM Fe**, 80 mm phosphate, pH 7.4, to
`208, 512-519
`0.4 mM DTPArequired 177 min at 25 °C, Thisclearly reflects
`5. Walling, C. (1975) Accts. Chem. Res. 8, 125-131
`cooTtT
`6. Koppenol, W. H., Butler, J. & VanLeewen, J. W. (1978) Photo-
`chem, Photobiol. 28, 655-660
`7. McCord, J. M. & Day, E. D., Jr. (1978) FEBS Lett. 86, 139-142
`8. Gutteridge, J. M. C., Richmond, R. & Halliwell, B.
`(1979)
`Biochem. J. 184, 469-472
`9. Floyd, R. A. & Lewis, C. A. (1983) Biochemistry 22, 2645-2649
`10. Svingen, B. A., Buege, J. A., O’Neal, F. O. & Aust, S. D. (1979)
`J. Biol. Chem. 254, 5892-5899
`11. Martell, A. E., Gustafson, R. & Chaberek, S. (1957) in Advances
`in Catalysis IX (Farkas, A., ed) pp. 319-329, Academic Press,
`New York
`12. Perutz, M. F. & Lehmann, H. (1968) Nature (Lond.) 219, 902-
`908
`13. Klein, S. M., Cohen, G. & Cederbaum,A. I. (1980) FEBS Lett.
`116, 220-222
`14. Klein, 8S. M., Cohen, G. & Cederbaum,A.I. (1981) Biochemistry
`20, 6006-6012
`
`15. Nash, T. (1953) Biochem. J. 55, 416-421
`
`
`
`
`
` ÿÿ
`
`  
`
`ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ
`
`
`
`
`8107‘TZISNBNYUOyson3Aq/S10‘0qgfMMM//:dyYWOTpopeopuUMog
`
`
`
`
`

`

`3624
`
`Free Coordination Sites and Iron Reactivity
`
`16. Graf, E. & Penniston, J. T. (1980) Clin. Chem. 26, 658-660
`17. Dorfman, L. M. & Adams, G. E.
`(1973) in Reactivity of the
`Hydroxyl Radical in Aqueous Solutions (Dorfman L. M., and
`Adams, G. E., eds) National Bureau of Standards, Washington,
`D.C.
`18. Brown, R. D., III, Brewer, C. F. & Koenig, S. H. (1977) Biochem-
`istry 16, 3883-3896
`19. Lind, M. D., Hamor, M. J., Hamor, T. A. & Hoard, J. L. (1964)
`Inorg. Chem. 3, 34-44
`20. Spiro, T. G. & Saltman, R. (1974) in Iron in Biochemistry and
`Medicine (Jacobs, A. & Worwood, M., eds) Vol. 1, pp. 1-28,
`Academic Press, New York
`21. Graf, E. (1983) J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 60, 1861-1867
`
`in Advances in Inorganic Chemistry
`(1982)
`22. Dabrowiak, J. C.
`(Eichhorn, G. L. & Marzilli, L. G., eds) Vol. 4, pp. 70-113,
`Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., New York
`23. Martell, A. E. & Smith, R. M. (1974) Critical Stability Constants,
`Vol. 1, Plenum Press, New York
`24. Crumbliss, A. L., Palmer, R. A., Sprinkle, K. A. & Whitcomb,D.
`R. (1975) in Symposium on the Development of Iron Chelators
`for Clinical Use (Anderson, W. F. & Hiller, M. C., eds) pp. 175-
`212, (Departmentof Health, Education, and Welfare, Bethesda,
`Publication NIH 76-994
`25. Martell, A. E. & Smith, R. M. (1982) Critical Stability Constants,
`Vol. 5, Supple. 1, Plenum Press, New York
`
`
`
`
`
`8107‘ZZJsnBnyUoysonsAq/S10°9q'MMM//:dy1yWOYpopeojuMog
`
`  
` ÿÿ
`
`ÿ 
`ÿ 
`ÿ
` ÿ
`
`
`ÿ
`
ÿ
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

` !"#ÿ$"%"!ÿ!ÿ&'ÿ()ÿ*+'ÿ&ÿ&ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ ÿÿÿ 
`
ÿÿÿ 
ÿ
ÿÿÿ

`
`,-./0ÿ23-456278562/9:9ÿ;<=>9ÿ?@AB9ÿ
`YMMRZZÿEDRÿ[NZEÿ\F]^ER]ÿ_ROZ`NQÿNaÿED`Zÿ^OE`MbRÿ^Eÿ ÿDEEFGHHIIIJKLMJNOPHMNQERQEHSTUHVHWVSX
`
`
`ÿÿ
`
`ÿYbROEZGÿÿÿ
`
`
`
`gb`MjÿDROR ÿcDRQÿED`Zÿ^OE`MbRÿ`ZÿM`ER]dÿÿÿENÿMDNNZRÿaON[ÿ^bbÿNaÿefghZÿRi[^`bÿ^bROEZ
`
`
`dÿÿ ÿcDRQÿ^ÿMNOORME`NQÿaNOÿED`Zÿ^OE`MbRÿ`ZÿFNZER]
`mD`Zÿ^OE`MbRÿM`ERZÿXÿORaRORQMRZnÿXÿNaÿID`MDÿM^QÿLRÿ^MMRZZR]ÿaORRÿ^E
`ÿDEEFGHHIIIJKLMJNOPHMNQERQEHSTUHVHWVSXJa\bbJDE[bkORaib`ZEil
`
`ÿÿ
`
` {
€  ÿ ÿ
`
`
`
`
`xyzz{
`
`{{|}o~| pz
`
`ÿo
`ÿp
`q rÿ

`
`ÿs
`qp
`
`qrÿttÿtuvw
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket