throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`––––––––––––––
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`––––––––––––––
`
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES S.A. AND
`DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES, INC.
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`INDIVIOR UK LIMITED,
`Patent Owner.
`
`––––––––––––––
`
`IPR2019-00329
`Patent 9,687,454
`
`––––––––––––––
`
`PATENT OWNER’S SUR-REPLY TO PETITIONER’S REPLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`In Indivior UK Limited’s (“Indivior”) Patent Owner Preliminary Response
`
`(Paper 12, “POPR”), Indivior explained that Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories S.A. and Dr.
`
`Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc. (“Petitioner” or “DRL”) failed to identify LTS Lohmann
`
`Therapy Systems, Corp. (“LTS”) as a real party in interest.
`
`During the conference call on April 16, 2019, the Board asked DRL’s counsel
`
`whether DRL could simply file an updated mandatory notice identifying LTS as a
`
`real party in interest. DRL’s Reply fails to respond to the Board’s inquiry, and DRL
`
`has chosen not to identify LTS as a real party in interest. Instead, DRL argues that
`
`LTS is not a real party in interest. DRL’s argument relies on a conclusory declaration
`
`consisting primarily of four brief paragraphs (Ex. 1027, ¶¶ 7–10) that fail to refute
`
`any of the seven pages of testimony by the CEO of LTS about the importance of its
`
`preexisting business relationship with DRL (POPR, Paper 12, at 42–45; Ex. 2004).
`
`Indivior submits that on the record evidence, and under Federal Circuit authority, as
`
`argued in the POPR, the Board may find LTS to be a real party in interest, and
`
`proceed accordingly.
`
`For the reasons set forth in Indivior’s POPR, the Board should deny institution
`
`of inter partes review of challenged claims 1–5 and 7–14 of U.S. Patent No.
`
`9,687,454.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Date: May 2, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By /Peter P. Chen /
`David A. Garr
` Registration No.: 74,932
`Peter P. Chen
` Registration No.: 39,631
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, I hereby certify that the foregoing Patent Owner’s Sur-
`
`Reply was served by email, by agreement of the parties, on the following counsel of
`
`record for petitioner.
`
`
`
`Ira J. Levy (ilevy@goodwinlaw.com)
`John Coy Stull (jstull@goodwinlaw.com)
`Robert Frederickson III (rfrederickson@goodwinlaw.com)
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`DG-Suboxone@goodwinlaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: May 2, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Peter P. Chen /
`Peter P. Chen
`Registration No.: 39,631
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket