From: Calvaruso, Joseph <jcalvaruso@orrick.com>  
`Sent: Friday, August 2, 2019 11:45 AM 
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV> 
`Cc: Dokhanchy, Reza <reza.dokhanchy@kirkland.com>; Buenrostro, Alejandra 
`<abuenrostro@kirkland.com>; Gramenopoulos, C. Gregory <c.gregory.gramenopoulos@finnegan.com>; 
`Horn, Kelly <Kelly.Horn@finnegan.com>; Zhu, Guang‐Yu <Guang‐Yu.Zhu@finnegan.com>; IP Prosecution 
`<ipprosecution@orrick.com>; #Avigilon_Axis <Avigilon_Axis@kirkland.com>; Martinelli, Richard F. 
`<rmartinelli@orrick.com>; Miller, Tyler <tmiller@orrick.com>; Ning, Weimin <wning@orrick.com> 
`Subject: IPR2019‐00311 and IPR2019‐00314 Objections to Evidence / Supplemental Evidence 
` 
`Dear Board:
`
`On July 22, 2019, Patent Owner filed Objections to Evidence in IPR2019-00311 and IPR2019-
`00314 relating to Exhibit 1007, the Florio Declaration, and its testimony regarding whether a
`number of the prior art references in the subject petitions are printed publications.
`
`Petitioners Canon and Axis seek authorization to file a motion addressing these objections in two
`ways.
`
`First, Petitioners seek authorization to file, as supplemental information, the supplemental
`evidence that will be timely served next Monday, August 5, 2019, in response to Patent Owner’s
`Objections to Evidence. Petitioners will be prepared to discuss the contents of this supplemental
`evidence with specificity on Monday, but currently intend that it include at least the following
`evidence: a MIT Library copy of the Dimitrova reference; a Library of Congress copy of the
`Flinchbaugh reference; a University of Virginia Library copy of the Brill reference; MIT
`declarations from other proceedings discussing MIT’s shelving and indexing policies; copies of
`webpages from the Library of Congress regarding the standard MARC format.
`
`Second, Petitioners seek authorization to file a motion to subpoena certain entities and compel
`testimony and/or production of documents from those entities under 37 C.F.R. § 42.52, and
`corresponding authorization to file any testimony or documents produced by any of these entities
`with the Board. Petitioners currently intend that these entities include at least one or more of the
`MIT Library, the University of Michigan Media Union, the University of Virginia Library, North
`Carolina State University Library, the University of California Los Angeles Science & Engineering
`Library, and the Library of Congress.
`
`Patent Owner opposes Petitioners’ request for authorization.
`
`The parties are available for a call next Tuesday or Wednesday (August 6 or 7) at 11:00AM
`Eastern.
`
`Respectfully submitted:
`
`Joseph A. Calvaruso, On behalf of both Petitioners
`
`
`
`Ex. 3002
`
`

`

`Joseph A. Calvaruso
`Partner, New YorkIntellectual Property Practice Group Leader
`Onick
`New York @
`T +1-212-506-5140
`M +1-914-414-5174
`jealvaruso@orrick.com
`
`O
`orrick
`
`
`LITIGATION
`
`
`
` NOTICE TO RECIPIENT| This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission, and may be a communication privileged by law. If you received this e-mail in error, any review, use,
`dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system. Thank you in
`advancefor your cooperation.
`
`For moreinformation about Orrick, pleasevisit hffp:/Awww.ornck.com.
`
`In the course of our businessrelationship, we may collect, store and transfer information about you. Please see our privacy policy at https:/Avww.orrick.com/Privacy-Policy to learn about how we use
`this information.
`
`
`
` 
`
`Ex. 3002
`Ex. 3002
`
`