`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
` --------------------------x
`
` COMCAST CABLE
`
` ) Case IPR2019-00237
`
` COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`
` ) Case IPR2019-00239
`
` Petitioner,
`
` ) Patent 7,779,011
`
` v. )
`
` )
`
` ) Case IPR2019-00290
`
` VEVEO, INC.,
`
` ) Case IPR2019-00292
`
` Patent Owner.
`
` ) Patent 7,937,394
`
` --------------------------x
`
` CONFIDENTIAL -- PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
` Videotaped Deposition of SAMUEL H. RUSS, PH.D.
`
` Washington, D.C.
`
` Thursday, January 9, 2020 - 9:05 a.m.
`
`Reported by:
`
`Lori J. Goodin, RPR, CLR, CRR, RSA
`
`California CSR #13959
`
`Job No.: 26658
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Comcast, Ex. 1232
`Comcast v. Rovi
`IPR2019-00292
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 2
`
` The deposition of SAMUEL H. RUSS, PH.D.,
`
` was convened on Thursday, January 9, 2020,
`
` commencing at 9:05 a.m., at the offices of
`
` STERNE KESSLER
`
` 1100 New York Avenue, Northwest
`
` # 600
`
` Washington, D.C. 20005
`
` before Lori J. Goodin, Registered Professional
`
` Reporter, Certified LiveNote Reporter, Certified
`
` Realtime Reporter, Realtime Systems Administrator,
`
` California CSR #13959, and Notary Public in and
`
` for the District of Columbia.
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`1 2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 3
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` APPEARANCES
`
` On Behalf of the Petitioner:
`
` JOHN R. HUTCHINS, ESQUIRE
`
` BENNETT INGVOLDSTAD, ESQUIRE
`
` CHUNHSI ANDY MU, ESQUIRE
`
` BANNER WITCOFF
`
` 1100 13th Street, Northwest, Suite 1200
`
` Washington, D.C. 20005
`
`202-824-3000
`
` jhutchins@bannerwitcoff.com
`
` bingvoldstad@bannerwitcoff.com
`
` amu@bannerwitcoff.com
`
` On Behalf of the Patent Holder:
`
` TYLER J. DUTTON, ESQUIRE
`
` DANIEL S. BLOCK, ESQUIRE
`
` STERNE KESSLER GOLDSTEIN & FOX, PLLC
`
` 1100 New York Avenue, Northwest, #600
`
` Washington, D.C. 20005
`
`202-772-8982
`
` tdutton@sternekessler.com
`
` dblock@sternekessler.com
`
` ALSO PRESENT:
`
` Nancy Holmstock, CLVS
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 4
`
` CONTENTS
`
` EXAMINATION BY PAGE
`
` Mr. Hutchins 7
`
` EXHIBITS
`
` RUSS
`
` EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION PAGE
`
` Exhibit 1 Dr. Russ's report in
`
` IPR2019-00237 9
`
` Exhibit 2 Dr. Russ's report in
`
` IPR2019-00239 10
`
` Exhibit 3 Dr. Russ's report in
`
` IPR2019-00290 10
`
` Exhibit 4 Dr. Russ's report in
`
` IPR2019-00292 11
`
` PREVIOUSLY MARKED EXHIBITS
`
` PRIOR MARKED EXHIBITS FIRST REFERRAL
`
` 1005 20
`
` 2015 27
`
` 1007 69
`
` 1008 82
`
` 2021 120
`
` 2221 130
`
` 2226 131
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4 5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
` EXHIBITS (C0NTINUED)
`
`Page 5
`
` PREVIOUSLY MARKED EXHIBITS
`
` PRIOR MARKED EXHIBITS
`
` FIRST REFERRAL
`
` 2227
`
` 2199
`
` 1003
`
` 2100
`
` 1011
`
` 1213
`
` 1010
`
` 131
`
` 131
`
` 138
`
` 139
`
` 143
`
` 144
`
` 152
`
` (Original exhibits attached to the
`
` original transcript.)
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
` PROCEEDINGS
`
`*
`
`* *
`
`Page 6
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are on the
`
` record. This is Video Number 1 in the
`
` videotaped deposition of Dr. Samuel H. Russ,
`
` in the matter of Comcast Cable
`
` Communications, LLC, petitioner, versus
`
` Veveo, Inc., patent owner, in the United
`
` States Patent and Trademark Office, before
`
` the Patent and Trial and Appeal Board, Case
`
` Number IPR 2019-237.
`
` This deposition is being held at the
`
` office of Sterne Kessler, located at 1100 New
`
` York Avenue, Northwest, Washington, D.C., on
`
` January 9th, 2020. The time is now 9:05 a.m.
`
` My name is Nancy Holmstock, from the
`
` firm Transperfect Legal Services. I am the
`
` video specialist. The court reporter today
`
` is Lori Goodin, also in association with
`
` Transperfect Legal Services.
`
` Will counsel please introduce
`
` themselves for the record.
`
` MR. HUTCHINS: John Hutchins from
`
` Banner & Witcoff representing the petitioner.
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 7
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` With me is Andy Mu and Ben Ingvoldstad.
`
` MR. DUTTON: And my name is Tyler
`
` Dutton from Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox on
`
` behalf of patent owner. And with me is
`
` Daniel Block, also from Sterne Kessler.
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the court
`
` reporter please swear in the witness.
`
` * * *
`
` Whereupon,
`
` SAMUEL H. RUSS, PH.D.,
`
` a witness called for examination, having been
`
` first duly sworn, was examined and testified as
`
` follows:
`
` * * *
`
` EXAMINATION
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. Good morning, Dr. Russ.
`
` A. Good morning.
`
` Q. Am I correct, you have been deposed
`
` before?
`
` A. Yes, I have.
`
` Q. Okay. So, I'm going to be asking
`
` you some questions here today.
`
` If for whatever reason you don't
`
` understand one of the questions I ask, just let
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 8
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` me know --
`
` A. Okay.
`
` Q. -- and I will try to clarify it, if
`
` I can.
`
` The court reporter is transcribing
`
` everything we say. So, please try to make your
`
` responses verbal.
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And, we will all try to refrain from
`
` talking over each other or interrupting, so only
`
` one person is talking at a time, which will make
`
` it easier for the court reporter.
`
` Is that okay?
`
` A. Absolutely.
`
` Q. If at any time you want to take a
`
` break, just let me know. And we will do so.
`
` I may ask if there is a question
`
` pending that that be answered. But, other than
`
` that, I am more than happy to accommodate a
`
` break, even if it seems like it has been a short
`
` time, I don't -- I want everybody to be
`
` comfortable in the room --
`
` A. Sure.
`
` Q. -- so, if it happens, it happens.
`
` And just let me know and I will accommodate that.
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 9
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. Certainly.
`
` Q. Now, in front of you I have had
`
` marked as the first four exhibits four reports
`
` that you submitted in some IPRs.
`
` And, I just, as an initial matter,
`
` wanted to go through them, not go through the
`
` report, but identify the report.
`
` A. Sure.
`
` (Russ Exhibit Number 1
`
` marked for identification.)
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. And so, the report that I have had
`
` marked as Exhibit 1 at the top is a report in
`
` IPR2019-00237.
`
` Do you see that?
`
` A. I do, correct.
`
` Q. And, that report relates to patent
`
` number 7,779,011. Do you see that?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. Is it all right if over the course
`
` of the day we refer to that as the '011 patent?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And, does this --
`
` Recognizing you of course have not
`
` read the copy that I have placed in front of you,
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 10
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` but does this at least appear recognizable to you
`
` as the report that you submitted on the '011
`
` patent in the 237 IPR?
`
` A. Yes. And I note it does include the
`
` appendices, for example. So, yes, it does appear
`
` to be a complete copy.
`
` Q. Thank you.
`
` (Russ Exhibit Number 2
`
` marked for identification.)
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. And then the second exhibit that has
`
` been marked is another report relating to the
`
` '011 patent. Do you see that?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. And this one, however, is in
`
` IPR2019-00239.
`
` Do you see that?
`
` A. I do, yes.
`
` Q. And, does this appear to be a second
`
` report that you submitted relating to the '011
`
` patent?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` (Russ Exhibit Number 3
`
` marked for identification.)
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 11
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. And, then the third report, which
`
` has been marked Exhibit 3 here today, is a report
`
` from you relating to the U.S. patent number
`
` 7,937,394. Do you see that?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. And is it okay if here today we
`
` refer to that patent as the '394 patent?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And, this report was submitted in an
`
` IPR numbered 2019-00290.
`
` Do you see that?
`
` A. I do, yes.
`
` Q. And does Exhibit 3 appear to be
`
` recognizable to you as the report you submitted
`
` in that IPR relating to the '394 patent?
`
` A. Yes, it does.
`
` (Russ Exhibit Number 4
`
` marked for identification.)
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. And, finally, what has been marked
`
` as Exhibit 4 is another report submitted by you
`
` relating to the '394 patent.
`
` Do you see that?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And, this was submitted in an IPR
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 12
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` numbered 2019-00292.
`
` Do you see that?
`
` A. I do, yes.
`
` Q. And does this appear to be the
`
` report you submitted relating to the '394 patent
`
` in the 292 IPR?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And, is it your general
`
` understanding that these four reports are the
`
` subject matter, generally speaking, of your
`
` deposition here today?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Now, if you look at Exhibit 1, which
`
` is the first report.
`
` A. Big report.
`
` Q. I know. Some of these are lengthy.
`
` A. A big binder -- a big binder clip, I
`
` should say, yes. No problem.
`
` Q. And, in the very beginning of your
`
` report, on Paragraph 1, you note you were
`
` retained by Sterne Kessler on behalf of a company
`
` called Veveo, Inc. Do you see that?
`
` A. I do, yes.
`
` Q. And, do you know --
`
` And a similar statement is in the
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 13
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` other reports.
`
` Do you know when you were retained
`
` on behalf of Veveo with respect to the matters we
`
` are talking about here today?
`
` MR. DUTTON: And I'm going to
`
` caution the witness. You can answer the
`
` question. But, I will caution the witness
`
` not to divulge attorney communications.
`
` THE WITNESS: Okay. Thank you.
`
` My offhand recollection is that it
`
` was late summer of 2019.
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. So, maybe the August time frame?
`
` A. Maybe August or September. And
`
` again that is merely my offhand recollection.
`
` Q. And how did it come to pass that you
`
` were retained?
`
` MR. DUTTON: Again, objection. I'm
`
` going to caution the witness not to divulge
`
` any attorney communications that you may have
`
` had.
`
` THE WITNESS: Okay.
`
` I honestly don't specifically
`
` recall, except at some point somebody
`
` e-mailed me and I responded. I don't
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 14
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` remember the details.
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. Were you reached out to by someone
`
` from Sterne Kessler?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And, prior to this instance, where
`
` someone from Sterne Kessler had contacted you
`
` with respect to these matters, had you previously
`
` undertaken work for the Sterne Kessler firm?
`
` A. I don't specifically recall. I
`
` don't think so, but again that is my offhand
`
` recollection.
`
` With all due respect, sometimes I
`
` remember attorneys more so than law firms.
`
` Q. But, sitting here today, as far as
`
` you recollect, the matters we are talking about
`
` here today are the first matters you have done
`
` with the Sterne Kessler firm?
`
` A. That is my offhand recollection,
`
` yes.
`
` Q. And, prior to being retained on
`
` behalf of Veveo with respect to these matters,
`
` had you previously undertaken any work for Veveo?
`
` MR. DUTTON: Objection, scope.
`
` Relevance.
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
` THE WITNESS: Not that I recall at
`
`Page 15
`
` the moment.
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. And, had you ever undertaken any
`
` work for Rovi?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And what prior work had you
`
` undertaken for Rovi?
`
` MR. DUTTON: Objection, scope.
`
` THE WITNESS: I am -- well, I'm not
`
` sure of the exact chronology. But I know I
`
` have been working on behalf of Rovi in an ITC
`
` case. And I am working on behalf of TiVo in
`
` a case involving Canadian patents.
`
` Understanding that Rovi, Veveo and
`
` TiVo I believe are all part of the same
`
` corporate structure.
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. And in what court or tribunal is the
`
` case involving TiVo proceeding?
`
` MR. DUTTON: Objection, scope.
`
` THE WITNESS: As -- I assume some
`
` sort of Canadian federal court. And I
`
` apologize. I'm not as familiar with Canadian
`
` law as I am U.S. law.
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
` I assume it is the equivalent of
`
`Page 16
`
` federal court.
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. And do you know who the opposing
`
` party to TiVo was in that matter?
`
` A. Videotron is one opposing company.
`
` I think Bell and Telus. And that is spelled
`
` T-E-L-U-S. Again, that is my offhand
`
` recollection.
`
` Q. And does the --
`
` Do the patents in that case involve
`
` processing search queries?
`
` MR. DUTTON: Objection, scope.
`
` Relevance.
`
` THE WITNESS: No.
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. And you mentioned you are working
`
` for Rovi with respect to an ITC case. Is that
`
` correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And do you know what patents are
`
` involved in that ITC case?
`
` MR. DUTTON: Objection. Scope.
`
` THE WITNESS: I don't remember the
`
` patent numbers. But -- excuse me, the patent
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 17
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` number, but it pertains to DVR and home
`
` networking, generally speaking.
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. And is that patent directed to the
`
` processing of search queries?
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. And do you know who the party
`
` adverse to Rovi is in that ITC case?
`
` A. I believe it is Comcast.
`
` Q. Other than the ITC case you just
`
` discussed and the matters we are here to talk
`
` about today, and the TiVo case you mentioned,
`
` have you undertaken any other work for Veveo,
`
` Rovi or TiVo?
`
` A. Not that I recall at the moment.
`
` Q. Do you know approximately how many
`
` hours you billed Rovi -- excuse me. Let me start
`
` over.
`
` Do you know approximately how many
`
` hours you have billed Veveo for reports that have
`
` been marked Exhibits 1 through 4?
`
` MR. DUTTON: Objection, form.
`
` THE WITNESS: I don't know offhand.
`
` Well into the dozens. Possibly hundreds.
`
` But, I don't know.
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 18
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. So, it may have been more than
`
` 100 hours?
`
` A. It is possible.
`
` Q. But, it may have also been less than
`
` 100. You are just not sure?
`
` A. That is correct.
`
` Q. Did you do anything to prepare for
`
` the deposition here today?
`
` A. I obviously read these reports
`
` again. And reviewed, you know, some of the
`
` materials considered. Met with counsel. Sort of
`
` those, those sorts of activities.
`
` Q. And, when did that occur?
`
` A. Over the course of the last two or
`
` three weeks.
`
` Q. And did you meet with anyone other
`
` than counsel to prepare for the deposition?
`
` A. Not that I recall.
`
` Q. Did you discuss your reports with
`
` anyone other than counsel to prepare for the
`
` deposition?
`
` MR. DUTTON: Objection. Form. I'm
`
` going to caution the witness not to divulge
`
` any communications you have -- you may have
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 19
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` had with counsel.
`
` THE WITNESS: Not that I --
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. Just to be clear. My question was
`
` did you discuss your reports with anyone other
`
` than counsel to prepare for the deposition?
`
` A. Right. And, to be clear, I
`
` understand the question. And my answer is not
`
` that I recall at the moment.
`
` Q. And for how long did you meet with
`
` counsel to prepare for the deposition?
`
` A. My offhand recollection is a few
`
` days.
`
` Q. The last few days?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Now, if you turn to Page 4 of your
`
` report that has been marked as Exhibit 1. And it
`
` proceeds for several pages, through page, I guess
`
` it is 18.
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. There is a listing of materials
`
` considered.
`
` And, my question is, are you aware
`
` of any materials that you reviewed upon which you
`
` based your opinions that are not listed in the
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 20
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` chart of materials considered in your report?
`
` MR. DUTTON: Objection, form.
`
` THE WITNESS: I, since there is a
`
` possibility of a typographical or clerical
`
` error, the way I would explain it is I
`
` consulted the materials listed here. And if
`
` there is something in my report that is cited
`
` that is not in this list, that is also
`
` something that I considered.
`
` But, as far as I know, this is the
`
` list of the materials.
`
` And I may have reviewed generally
`
` other like industry or articles, but this is
`
` what I, you know, relied upon.
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. Okay. And is there any particular
`
` article you had in mind when you gave that
`
` answer? Or no?
`
` A. The articles that I relied upon are
`
` the ones that are cited here.
`
` My point is, I may have consulted
`
` other materials, but this is what I am relying on
`
` for my opinions.
`
` (Whereupon, previously marked
`
` Exhibit 1005, first referral.)
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 21
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. Okay. Let me hand you what has been
`
` marked as Exhibit 1005.
`
` A. Okay.
`
` Q. And that is a patent 8,433,696. Do
`
` you see that?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. And is it all right if I call that
`
` the '696 patent?
`
` A. It is, yes.
`
` Q. Okay. And this is listed in the
`
` materials considered on the first page of the
`
` chart in your report.
`
` Do you recollect reviewing the '696
`
` patent?
`
` A. Not specifically. But, I mean, I
`
` reviewed a lot of materials.
`
` Q. And the '696 patent is not one of
`
` the patents at issue in the IPRs in which you
`
` have submitted reports, correct?
`
` A. Correct.
`
` Q. Did you undertake any analysis to
`
` compare the claims of the '696 patent with the
`
` claims of either the '011 or '394 patents?
`
` A. No.
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 22
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. And so am I correct that you also
`
` then did not undertake any analysis to determine
`
` whether the claims of the '696 patent were
`
` patently distinct from the claims of the '011 or
`
` '394 patents?
`
` A. I did not undertake any such review.
`
` Q. And did you do any work for Veveo or
`
` Rovi relating to any IPR or other proceedings
`
` relating to the '696 patent?
`
` MR. DUTTON: Objection, scope.
`
` Relevance.
`
` THE WITNESS: Not that I recall at
`
` the moment.
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. Did you review any materials
`
` relating to the IPR or appeal of the IPR relating
`
` to the '696 patent?
`
` MR. DUTTON: Objection, scope.
`
` Relevance.
`
` THE WITNESS: I have reviewed a lot
`
` of materials going into this.
`
` I don't have a specific recollection
`
` of that.
`
` And I apologize, counselor. Should
`
` this be marked Exhibit 5 or is this --
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 23
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` MR. HUTCHINS: It is premarked
`
` Exhibit 1005 at the bottom.
`
` THE WITNESS: Oh, okay. Thank you.
`
` All right.
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. As an aside, so have exhibits 1
`
` through 4. But, the exhibit numbers are the same
`
` for the four reports. So, to avoid confusion --
`
` A. Okay, sure.
`
` Q. -- I had them marked 1, 2, 3, 4.
`
` But, generally today if there is an
`
` exhibit that has already been stamped with a
`
` number, I will try to use that number.
`
` A. Okay. All right. Thank you. I
`
` appreciate you bringing that to my attention.
`
` Thank you.
`
` Q. No worries at all.
`
` Now, in the chart of materials
`
` considered in your reports, there is a long list
`
` of confidential Veveo documents that begin at
`
` around Exhibit 2100 which, for instance, is at
`
` the bottom of Page 5 of the report that has been
`
` marked as Exhibit 1 --
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. -- and continues through the rest of
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 24
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` the chart.
`
` Did you do anything to independently
`
` confirm the dates of creation of any of those
`
` documents?
`
` MR. DUTTON: Objection. Scope.
`
` THE WITNESS: No, I accepted the
`
` representation of my counsel.
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. Okay. Did you undertake any actions
`
` to collect those documents, or were they provided
`
` to you?
`
` A. They were provided to me.
`
` Q. Other than counsel, so excluding
`
` discussions you have had or may have had with
`
` your attorneys, did you have discussions with
`
` anybody else about the internal Veveo documents
`
` that are listed in your materials considered in
`
` your report?
`
` MR. DUTTON: Objection, form.
`
` THE WITNESS: Not that I recall at
`
` the moment.
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. And, do you recall asking anybody
`
` other than counsel to help you understand the
`
` contents of any of those documents?
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 25
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. Not that I recall.
`
` Q. And without saying anything other
`
` than yes or no, did counsel provide you
`
` information about the contents of those documents
`
` upon which you relied in issuing your opinions in
`
` this report, just yes or no?
`
` MR. DUTTON: Objection. I'm going
`
` to instruct the witness not to answer that
`
` question.
`
` Calls for attorney communications.
`
` MR. HUTCHINS: Well, the stipulation
`
` we have explicitly allows me to ask if
`
` counsel has provided information upon which
`
` the expert relied in giving his opinions.
`
` If he relied upon it in giving his
`
` opinions, I am entitled to it.
`
` If not, not.
`
` But, for him to answer that yes or
`
` no is explicitly allowed in the stipulation.
`
` But, I want to be -- I just want to
`
` be clear on what I'm asking -- I want you to
`
` be clear on what I'm asking.
`
` I'm simply asking if counsel
`
` provided him information about those
`
` documents upon which he relied in issuing his
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 26
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` opinion.
`
` So, with that understanding of my
`
` question, is your instruction still for him
`
` not to answer that yes or no?
`
` MR. DUTTON: You may answer the
`
` question yes or no. But, I will caution the
`
` witness not to divulge any communications you
`
` had with counsel.
`
` THE WITNESS: Okay. And I want to
`
` make sure I understand the sense of the
`
` question, counselor.
`
` Your question is did I rely upon --
`
` I'm sorry. Please repeat the question. That
`
` might be clearer for the record.
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. Certainly. Did counsel provide you
`
` information about any of those internal Veveo
`
` documents upon which you relied in issuing your
`
` opinions in your reports?
`
` A. No. Only the documents themselves.
`
` Q. Okay. Thank you.
`
` Forgive me. There are so many
`
` exhibits, sometimes it takes a little bit of time
`
` to get the correct one.
`
` Dr. Russ, on Paragraph 19 of your
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 27
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` report that is marked as Exhibit 1, there is a
`
` reference to your CV containing additional
`
` details on your education experience, et cetera.
`
` Do you see that?
`
` A. I do.
`
` (Whereupon, previously marked
`
` Exhibit 2015, first referral.)
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. And, I have -- you have also been
`
` handed what has been previously marked as
`
` Exhibit 2015, which at the top says Curriculum
`
` Vitae of Dr. Samuel H. Russ.
`
` Do you see that?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. And is it your understanding
`
` Exhibit 2015 is the CV that you are referencing
`
` in Paragraph 19?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And as far as you know, is this an
`
` accurate CV for you?
`
` A. Unless there is some extra thing
`
` that has been added, like an extra publication or
`
` something, yes.
`
` Q. Okay. Looking at it, are you aware
`
` of --
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 28
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Is there a particular publication
`
` you have in mind that might be missing?
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. Also in Paragraph 19 of your report,
`
` you reference that your work on this case is
`
` billed at a rate of $350 an hour.
`
` Do you see that?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. And is that your standard rate for
`
` consulting with respect to legal matters?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. If you go up one paragraph in your
`
` report, there is a reference to some 32 journal
`
` articles and conference papers that you have
`
` authored.
`
` Do you see that?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. And, do you know if any of those
`
` articles or papers are directed to the subject
`
` matter of search query processing?
`
` A. My offhand recollection is they are
`
` not.
`
` Q. And, if you look at Paragraph 15 of
`
` your report, and in particular the last sentence
`
` notes that you are a named inventor on some 51
`
`TransPefect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Page 29
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` patent applications, at least 28 of which have
`
` issued as patents. Do you see that?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. And do you know if any of those
`
` patent applications or issued patents were
`
` directed to search query processing?
`
` MR. DUTTON: Objection, form.
`
` THE WITNESS: My offhand recollection
`
` is they were not.
`
` BY MR. HUTCHINS:
`
` Q. Have you ever personally written any
`
` software to handle search query processing?
`
` A. What do you mean by search query
`
` processing?
`
` Q. So, do you have a general
`
` understanding that the '011 and '394 patents are
`
` directed to a method of handling search queries
`
` that are intended to retrieve various data?
`
` MR. DUTTON: Objection. Form.
`
` Calls for a legal conclusion.
`
`