throbber
Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 2059-2063
`
`Fused Quartz Substrates for Microchip
`Electrophoresis
`Stephen C. Jacobson,* Alvin W. Moore, and J. Michael Ramsey
`Chemical and Analytical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008
`Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6142
`
`A fused quartz microchip is fabricated to perform capillary
`electrophoresis of metal ions complexed with 8-hydroxy-
`quinoline- 5-sulfonic acid (HQS). The channel manifold
`on the quartz substrate is fabricated using standard
`photolithographic, etching, and deposition techniques. By
`incorporating a direct bonding technique during the
`fabrication of the microchip, the substrate and cover plate
`can be fused together below the melting temperature for
`fused quartz. To enhance the resolution for the separa-
`tion, the electroosmotic flow is minimized by covalently
`bonding polyacrylamide to the channel walls. A separa-
`tion length of 16.5 mm and separation field strength of
`870 V/cm enable separations to be performed in <15 s.
`By increasing the concentration of HQS from 5 mM to 20
`mM, the separation efficiency improves by ~3 times. The
`low background signal from the fused quartz substrate
`results in mass detection limits of 85,61, and 134 amol
`and concentration detection limits of46,57, and 30 ppb
`for Zn, Cd, and Al, respectively.
`
`Miniaturized chemical analysis instruments fabricated using
`micromachining techniques are receiving increasing attention. The
`more successful demonstrations for miniaturized instruments
`incorporate liquid phase separation techniques. Devices have
`been demonstrated for capillary electrophoresis,1-6 free-flow
`electrophoresis,1 234567 open channel electrochromatography,8 910*and capil-
`lary electrophoresis with pre- and postcolumn derivatization.910
`All of the previously demonstrated devices utilize glass substrates.
`By moving to quartz substrates, the superior optical properties
`of quartz especially in the UV region can be exploited. For both
`capillary electrophoresis and liquid chromatography, the most
`useful wavelength range for the purpose of optical detection is
`200-400 nm, and the ability to fabricate fused quartz microchips
`permits investigation of similar detection scenarios.
`
`(1) Harrison, D. J.; Manz, A; Fan, Z.; Lüdi, H.; Widmer,  , M. Anal. Chem.
`1992, 64, 1926.
`(2) Manz, A; Harrison, J.; Verpoorte, E. M. J.; Fettinger, J. C.; Paulus, A; Liidi,
`H.; Widmer, H. M.J. Chromatogr. 1992, 593, 253.
`(3) Seiler, K; Harrison, D. J.; Manz, A Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 1481.
`(4) Harrison, D. J.; Fluri, K; Seiler, K; Fan, Z.; Effenhauser, C. S.; Manz, A
`Science 1993, 261, 895.
`(5) Jacobson, S. C.; Hergenrtider, R.; Koutny, L. B.; Warmack, R J.; Ramsey, J.
`M. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66,1107.
`(6) Jacobson, S. C.; Hergenrtider, R; Koutny, L. B.; Ramsey, J. M. Anal. Chem.
`1994, 66, 1114.
`(7) Raymond, D. E.; Manz, A; Widmer,  . M. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 2858.
`(8) Jacobson, S. C.; Hergenrtider, R; Koutny, L. B.; Ramsey, J. M. Anal. Chem.
`1994, 66, 2369.
`(9) Jacobson, S. C.; Hergenrtider, R; Moore, A W., Jr.; Ramsey, J. M. Anal.
`Chem. 1994, 66, 4127.
`(10) Jacobson, S. C.; Koutny, L B.; Hergenrtider, R; Moore, A W., Jr.; Ramsey,
`J. M. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 3472.
`
`0003-2700/95/0367-2059S9.00/0 &copy; 1995 American Chemical Society
`
`injection
`cross
`
`Figure 1. Schematic of the fused quartz microchip. The reservoirs
`are affixed on the microchip via epoxy.
`
`To test the performance of fused quartz substrates, metal ions
`complexed with S-hydroxyquinoline-5-sulfonic acid (HQS) are
`separated by electrophoresis and detected with UV laser-induced
`fluorescence. HQS has been widely used as a ligand for optical
`determinations of metal ions following initial work by Fiegl and
`Heisig.11 The optical properties and the solubility of HQS in
`aqueous media have recently been used for detection of metal
`ions separated by ion chromatography12 and capillary electro-
`phoresis.13 Because uncomplexed HQS does not fluoresce, excess
`ligand is added to the buffer to maintain the complexation
`equilibria during the separation without contributing a large
`background signal. This benefits both the efficiency of the
`separation and the detectability of the sample.
`In this paper, the fabrication of fused quartz microchips is
`described. Direct bonding of the cover plate to the substrate
`enables covalent bonding to be performed below the melting
`temperature of fused quartz. A simple cross channel manifold
`(Figure 1) is constructed to perform electrophoretic analysis of
`metal ions complexed with HQS. The electroosmotic flow of the
`microchip is minimized by covalently bonding polyacrylamide to
`the surface of the channels. This enables a higher resolution to
`be achieved in a shorter separation time and length.
`Improved
`efficiency with increasing HQS concentration is also discussed.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
`The microchips are fabricated using standard photolitho-
`graphic, wet chemical etching and bonding techniques.14 First,
`
`(11) Fiegl, F.; Heisig, G. B. Anal. Chim. Acta 1949, 3, 561.
`(12) Soroka, K.; Vithanage, R S.; Phillips, D. A; Walker, B.; Dasgupta, P. K.
`Anal. Chem. 1987, 59, 629.
`(13) Swaile, D. F.; Sepaniak, M. J. Anal. Chem. 1991, 63, 179.
`(14) For example: Ko, W. H.; Suminto, J. T. In Sensors; Gopel, W., Hasse, J.,
`Zemmel, J. N., Eds.; VCH: Weinhein, Germany, 1989; Vol. 1, pp 107-168.
`Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 67, No. 13, July 1, 1995 2059
`
`Downloaded via UNIV OF VIRGINIA on November 6, 2018 at 17:55:00 (UTC).
`
`See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.
`
`Agilent Exhibit 1282
`Page 1 of 5
`
`

`

`time [s]
`Figure 3. Electropherogram of Zn, Cd, and Al complexed with
`(a, top) Esep = 870 V/cm and Z.sep = 16.5 mm. The injected
`HQS:
`concentrations are 8.5 (130), 6.7 (60), and 4.3 ppm (160 µ ) for Zn,
`Cd, and Al, respectively (b, bottom) Esep = 720 V/cm and Lsef> = 16.5
`mm. The injected concentrations are 260 (4.0), 210 (1.9), and 130
`ppb (4.9 µ ) for Zn, Cd, and Al, respectively.
`
`The microchip is operated in either a sample loading or
`separation mode. The floating sample loading, described previ-
`ously,4 is used to transport the sample to the injection cross,
`enabling a larger volume sample plug to be injected onto the
`separation column than ivith the pinched sample loading. The
`average sample plug volume for the floating sample loading is
`estimated to be 120 pL compared to 65 pL for the pinched sample
`loading. These volumes are determined by measuring injected
`plug widths 0.1 mm downstream from the injection cross. For
`comparison, the volume of the injection cross is 43 pL. With the
`floating sample loading, the injected plug has no electrophoretic
`bias, but the volume of sample is a function of the sample loading
`time. Because the sample loading time is inversely proportional
`to the field strength used, for high sample loading field strengths
`a shorter sample loading time is used than for low injection field
`strengths. For example, for a sample loading field strength of
`630 V/cm (Figure 3a), the sample loading time is 12 s, and for a
`sample loading field strength of 520 V/cm (Figure 3b), the sample
`loading time is 14.5 s. Both the pinched and floating sample
`loadings can be used with and without suppression of
`the
`electroosmotic flow. To implement the floating sample loading,
`
`20
`
`40
`
`7.6 µ  
`
`I 0
`
`20
`
`o,
`0)
`13
`
`-20
`
`.......
`-40
`
`-20
`
`width [µ  ]
`Figure 2. Profile of separation channel machined on a fused quartz
`substrate.
`
`the fused quartz substrates (50 mm x 25 mm x
`1 mm; Esco
`Products, Inc. R120110) are sputtered with metal films of chro-
`mium (30 nm) and gold (400 nm). A positive photoresist (Shipley
`1811) is then spin-coated on top of the Au film, and the column
`design (Figure 1) is transferred to the substrate using an e-beam
`written photomask (Institute of Advanced Manufacturing Sciences,
`Inc.). Following exposure, the metal films are etched using KI/
`I2 for Au and KsFetCFOe/NaOH for Cr. Finally, the channels are
`etched into the substrate in a dilute, stirred HF/NH4F bath at 50
`°C. Due to the isotropic etch of amorphous materials, the channel
`profile is trapezoidal. Figure 2 shows the cross section of the
`quartz channel measured by a profilometer (Alpha Step 200,
`Tencor Instruments) prior to bonding the cover plate. The
`channel depth is 7.6 µ  , and the channel width at half-depth is
`75 µ  . To form the closed network of channels, a circular cover
`plate (25 mm diameter; Esco Products, Inc. R525000) is bonded
`to the substrate over
`the etched channels. The substrate and
`cover plate are first hydrolyzed in NH4OH/H2O2 at 50 °C, rinsed
`in H20, joined, and then annealed at 1100 °C for 5 h. Cylindrical
`glass reservoirs are affixed on the substrate using epoxy. The
`channel walls are then coated with polyacrylamide to minimize
`electroosmotic flow.15 First, the channels of the microchip are
`filled with a solution of [y-(methacryloxy)propyl]trimethoxysilane
`0.4% (v/v) in water (pH 3.5, adjusted with acetic acid) for 30 min.
`The channels are then flushed with water and filled with a 3%
`(w/v) solution of acrylamide in water with 0.1% (v/v) NJfJffl'·
`tetramethylethylenediamine and 0.1% (w/v) potassium persulfate
`for 30 min. The excess acrylamide solution is removed, and the
`channels are rinsed sequentially with water and separation buffer.
`Column performance and separations are monitored on-
`microchip using a single-point detection scheme via laser-induced
`fluorescence (LIF). An argon ion laser (351.1-363.8 nm, 10 mW;
`Coherent Innova 90) is used for excitation and focused to a spot
`length). The
`on the microchip using a lens (100 mm focal
`fluorescence signal is collected using a 21 x microscope objective,
`followed by spatial filtering (0.6 mm diameter pinhole) and spectral
`filtering (425 nm cutoff; Coming 3-73), and measured using a
`photomultiplier tube (PMT; Oriel 77340). The data acquisition/
`voltage switching apparatus is computer controlled using pro-
`grams written in-house in Labview 3.0 (National Instruments).
`Platinum electrodes provide electrical contact from the power
`supply (Spellman CZE1000R) to the solutions in the reservoirs.
`The compounds used for the experiments are zinc sulfate,
`cadmium nitrate, and aluminum nitrate. The buffer is sodium
`phosphate (60 mM, pH 6.9) with 8-hydroxyquinoline-5-sulfonic
`acid (20 mM for all experiments except that in Figure 5; Sigma
`Chemical Co.). At least 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer is
`needed to dissolve up to 20 mM HQS.
`(15) Hjerten, S. /. Chromatogr. 1985, 347, 191.
`
`2060 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 67, No. 13, July 1, 1995
`
`Agilent Exhibit 1282
`Page 2 of 5
`
`

`

`Table 1. Data for Figure 3a
`electrophoretic
`mobility (104 cm2 V-1 s-1)
`1.65
`
`metal ion
`
`Zn
`
`Cd
`
`Al
`
`1.49
`
`1.28
`
`plate no.
`8200
`
`6500
`
`3200
`
`resolution
`
`2.26
`
`2.86
`
`a voltage is applied to the sample reservoir with the sample waste
`reservoir grounded and the buffer and waste reservoirs floating.
`After the slowest moving ion, e.g., Al, passes through the injection
`cross, the applied potentials are reconfigured for the separation
`In the separation mode, the voltage is applied to the buffer
`mode.
`reservoir with the waste reservoir grounded and with sample and
`sample waste reservoirs at 60% of the buffer reservoir potential.
`Having a voltage applied to the sample and sample waste
`reservoirs at a fraction of the buffer reservoir voltage prevents
`excess sample from bleeding into the separation column.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`Figure 3 shows the separation of three metal ions complexed
`with 8-hydroxyquinoline-5-sulfonic acid. All three complexes have
`a net negative charge. With the electroosmotic flow minimized
`by the covalent bonding of polyacrylamide to the channel walls,
`negative potentials relative to ground are used to manipulate the
`In panels a and
`complexes during sample loading and separation.
`b of Figure 3, the separation channel field strength is 870 and
`720 V/cm, respectively, and the separation length is 16.5 mm.
`The volume of the injection plug is 120 pL, which corresponds to
`16, 7, and 19 fmol injected for Zn, Cd, and Al, respectively, for
`In Figure 3b, 0.48, 0.23, and 0.59 fmol of Zn, Cd, and
`Figure 3a.
`Al, respectively, are injected onto the separation column. The
`average reproducibility of the amounts injected is 1.6% relative
`standard deviation (rsd) as measured by peak areas (six replicate
`analyses). The stability of the laser used to excite the complexes
`is ~1% rsd.
`The primary purpose of eliminating the electroosmotic flow is
`to enhance the resolution of the separation. For electrophoretic
`the resolution between two components can be
`separations,
`written16
`
` JÑl Ph
`t1 B
`4 v“av + ,WEO
`
`(1)
`
`where N is the average number of theoretical plates, µ\ and µß
`are the electrophoretic mobilities for components A and B,
`respectively, µ\\ is the average electrophoretic mobility for A and
`is the electroosmotic mobility. Electroosmosis does
`B, and µ  
`not contribute to the separation. To maximize the resolution,
`electroosmosis must be eliminated or precisely controlled, e.g.,
`application of an external field.17 For simplicity, electroosmosis
`is minimized by covalently bonding polyacrylamide to the channel
`surface.
`Table 1 lists the efficiencies and resolution (eq 1) generated
`for each complex in Figure 3a. The resolution obtained between
`
`(16) Jorgenson, J. W.; Lukács, K. D. Anal. Ckem. 1981, 53, 1298.
`(17) Lee, C. S.; Banchard, W. C.; Wu, C. T. Anal. Chem. 1990, 62, 1550.
`
`separation field strength [V/cm]
`Figure 4. Variation of linear velocity for Zn (O), Cd ( ), and Al ( )
`and separation column current ( ) with separation field strength. Lines
`represent linear fits for separation field strengths from 140 to 580
`V/cm and extrapolated to 870 V/cm.
`
`Zn/Cd and Cd/Al is 2.25 and 2.86, respectively. To obtain a
`comparable resolution, e.g., 2.25, with electroosmotic flow would
`require a longer separation column and analysis time. For
`example, with an electroosmotic mobility of 5.7  
`10™4 cm2 V"1
`s-1 (measured on a microchip without the electroosmotic flow
`minimized), a field strength of 870 V/cm and a resolution of 2.25,
`a separation length of 11.5 cm is required to resolve these three
`metal ion complexes, and the total analysis time increases to 33
`s. Also, to produce the equivalent separation field strength, a 9.9
`kV power supply is required compared to 1.4 kV for this
`separation. The smaller power supply is more amenable to
`miniaturization.
`The analysis time can be reduced by increasing the separation
`field strength and, consequently, the linear velocity of the sample16
`u = µ.^
`(2)
`
`where µ is the electrophoretic mobility and  ^  is the separation
`field strength. The electrophoretic mobility depends on the
`If the heat generated in the separation
`viscosity of the buffer.
`column is not dissipated efficiently during a separation,
`the
`viscosity of the buffer decreases, leading to higher than predicted
`linear velocities for the sample zones.
`In Figure 4 the linear
`velocity of the sample zones are plotted versus
`the electric field
`strength. For separation field strengths of > 720 V/cm, a deviation
`from linear behavior is observed. Also, plotted in Figure 4 is the
`current measured in the separation column. As expected, the
`current in the separation column exhibits the same nonlinear
`behavior for field strengths of >720 V/cm. For separation field
`strengths of 720 and 870 V/cm, the microchip required ~2 min
`for the linear velocities to stabilize. The reproducibility of the
`linear velocities is 0.1% rsd (six replicate analyses). To reduce
`this heating effect at comparable separation field strengths,
`channels with smaller cross-sectional areas or lower concentration
`(lower conductivity) buffers are two possibilities. Optimum HQS
`concentration for detection and separation (discussed below) is
`least 50 mM
`determined to be 20 mM, which requires at
`phosphate buffer for dissolution. Thus, 80 mM for a total buffer
`the operating limit for these experiments.
`concentration is near
`
`Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 67, No. 13, July 1, 1995
`
`2061
`
`Agilent Exhibit 1282
`Page 3 of 5
`
`

`

`Table 2. Detection Limits
`concentration
`ppb
`46
`57
`30
`
`metal ion
`Zn
`Cd
`Al
`
`µ 
`0.71
`0.51
`1.12
`
`120 pL injection volume.
`
`mass0
`(amol)
`
`85
`61
`134
`
`,
`
`2Pm
`/t£sep
`
`dominant form for Zn and Cd is a 2:1 ligand-metal complex, and
`for Al a 3:1 complex. The Al complex with a 3- charge might
`If two or more species exist
`undergo an ion-pairing phenomena.
`in the sample band for Al, additional band dispersion results
`because the species will migrate at different velocities, yet cannot
`be resolved under these conditions. For HQS concentrations of
`>20 mM, significant
`improvements in the efficiency are not
`observed. The relationships between HQS concentration, the
`complex formation constant, and band broadening associated with
`HQS-metal complexes in capillary electrophoresis have been
`investigated.12 Additional band broadening was previously at-
`tributed to nonequilibrium conditions at injection, various HQS-
`metal species in the sample band, and competing equilibria with
`supporting electrolyte.12 For these experiments, nonequilibrium
`conditions at
`injection do not occur because the sample and
`separation buffers are the same. With the magnitude of the
`formation constants listed above and the large excess of HQS,
`multiple metal-HQS species seems improbable.
`For electrophoresis, the contributions to the total plate height
`from the injection plug length, detector observation length,20 axial
`diffusion,21 and Joule heating22 are
`, 4t
`4j
`16¿sep+16¿sep
`
`+
`
`7 X lQ"9<ep^-2^
`Dy
`
`,d)
`
`Figure 5. Variation of plate height for Zn (O), Cd ( ), and Al (O)
`with concentration of HQS. Error bars are ± 
`for three analyses.
`
`In addition to resolving power and analysis time, detection must
`also be considered in an analytical procedure. Detection limits
`are measured using serial dilutions of a stock solution of the metal
`ions. The measurements are performed by separating the mixture
`of the metal ions, using the experimental conditions in Figure
`3b. The data are then extrapolated to a signal-to-noise ratio (S/
`N) of 2, to give the concentration and mass detection limits listed
`in Table 2. Figure 3b shows the electropherogram at the lowest
`concentration injected for the mixture during the detection limit
`study. The peaks correspond to an average S/N for 3 runs of
`16.4,10.7, and 8.6 for Zn, Cd, and Al, respectively, which are within
`1 order of magnitude of the estimated detection limits (Table 2).
`A pH 6.9 separation buffer is near
`the optimum conditions for
`fluorescence detection of the complexes with Zn, Cd, and Al.11
`Detection limits are improved by using a fused quartz substrate
`as opposed to a glass substrate. The observed background signal
`from the experimental apparatus with the fused quartz substrate
`inserted is 30% of the background signal observed for glass. The
`primary contributions to the background signal include stray room
`light, scattered laser light, and inelastic scattering from the
`microscope objective and microchip substrate. Further reductions
`in background signals are expected by improving the quality of
`the optical components.
`A substantial decrease in the plate height is observed with
`increasing concentrations of HQS in the separation buffer. Figure
`5 shows the variation of the plate height with concentration of
`the HQS. The Al complex exhibits the poorest efficiency. The
`formation constants for Zn, Cd, and Al are   16 2, 1014·2,18 and 109,19
`respectively. Because of
`the large formation constants,
`the
`
`(18) Lange’s Handbook of Chemistry, 14th ed.; Dean, J. A, Ed.; McGraw-Hill Book
`Co.: New York, 1992.
`
`2062 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 67, No. 13, July 1, 1995
`
`where l¡n¡ is the injection plug length, Idet is the detector observation
`length, Lgep is the separation length, Dm is the diffusion coefficient,
`dc is the channel depth,23   is the molar conductivity of the buffer,
`is the thermal conductivity of
`C is the buffer concentration, and  
`the buffer. The contributions from the injection plug length and
`detector observation length assume Gaussian distributions. The
`lengths of the injection plug and the detector observation are
`If these time-independent contribu-
`constant for all experiments.
`tions predominate in their contribution to the plate height, then
`the total plate height decreases as the separation length increases.
`The contribution from axial diffusion to the plate height is reduced
`by increasing the separation field strength and, consequently,
`reducing the analysis time. The contribution from Joule heating
`can be minimized by controlling the channel dimensions, separa-
`tion field strength, and buffer concentration.
`In Figure 6, the variation of the total plate height with the
`electric field strength is plotted. For these experiments,
`the
`injection plug length is 330 µ   and the detector observation length
`is 80 µ  . The corresponding contributions to the plate height
`from the injection plug length and detector observation length
`are 0.41 µ   and 24 nm, respectively. These contributions are
`small relative to the measured plate heights. The contribution
`from axial diffusion decreases with increasing field strength.
`
`(19) Bishop, J. A Anal Chetn. Acta 1973, 63, 305.
`(20) Sternberg, J. C. Adv. Chromatogr. 1966, 2, 205.
`(21) Giddings, J. C. Dynamics of Chromatography, Parti: Principles and Theory,
`Marcel Dekker: New York, 1965; Chapter 2.
`(22) Knox, J. H.; Grant, I. H. Chromatographia 1987, 24, 135.
`(23) dc usually corresponds to the capillary diameter. In this case, a channel
`with a trapezoidal cross section is under consideration, and the channel
`depth will be used for estimating the contribution of Joule heating to the
`plate height.
`(24) Monnig, C. A; Jorgenson, J. W. Anal. Chem. 1991, 63, 802.
`(25) Hjertén, S.; Elenbring, K.; Kilár, F.; Liao, J.-L; Chen, A; Siebert, C. J.; Zhu,
`M.-D. /. Chromatogr. 1987, 403, 47.
`(26) Aebersold, R.; Morrison, H. D./. Chromatogr. 1990, 516, 79.
`(27) Jandik, P.; Jones, W. R./. Chromatogr. 1991, 546, 431.
`
`Agilent Exhibit 1282
`Page 4 of 5
`
`

`

`heating in eq 3, this contribution can be estimated. For/t(Zn) =
`= 870 V/cm, dc = 7.6 µ  ,   = 0.015
`1.65 x 10"4 cm2 V"1 s"1,
`m2 mol-1  "1, C = 80 mM, Dm =
`5 x 10"6 cm2 s"1, and  
`= 0.6
`W nr1 K-1; the contribution of Joule heating to the plate height
`is 6.5 pm. As calculated, this contribution is insignificant relative
`to the plate height data. An alternative explanation for this
`discrepancy in the experimental and calculated plate height might
`be due to geometrical fluctuations in the channel over the length
`of the separation channel. As fabrication techniques for glass and
`quartz substrates improve, this discrepancy is likely to decrease
`as was the case for silica capillaries.
`In conclusion, metal ions complexed with 8-hydroxyquinoline-
`5-sulfonic acid are resolved in less than 15 s using microchip
`electrophoresis, and detection limits are in the range of 30-60
`ppb. To enhance the detection limits for these complexes, a
`preconcentration step can be added prior to the separation. A
`sample preconcentration method that can be easily incorporated
`with electrophoretic analyses is field-amplified sample injection
`and sample stacking.25"28 Enhancements in detection limits up
`to 103 times have been observed using stacking methods with
`conventional capillary electrophoresis.29 Similar stacking proce-
`dures have been demonstrated on microchips30 and may allow
`sub-ppb detection limits for metal ions.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`This research is sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy
`(DOE), Office of Research and Development Oak Ridge National
`Laboratory is managed by Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.
`for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-
`this research is sponsored in part by an
`840R21400. Also,
`appointment for AW-M. to the ORNL Postdoctoral Research
`Associates Program. These postdoctoral programs are adminis-
`tered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education and
`ORNL.
`
`Received for review December 13, 1994. Accepted April
`10, 1995.
`AC9412037
`
`Abstract published in Advance ACS Abstracts, June 1, 1995.
`
`3O5r
`
`e
`

`
`re3
`ore9
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`O
`
`separation field strength [V/cm]
`Figure 6. Variation of plate height for Zn (O), Cd ( ), and Al (O)
`and power/length ( ) with the separation field strength complexed
`with HQS. The solid line is the calculated plate height for Zn using
`eq 3. Error bars are ±a for three analyses.
`
`However, the experimental plate height data do not asymptotically
`approach the sum of the time-independent contributions at high
`In Figure 6, the calculated plate height for Zn
`field strengths.
`using eq 3 (µ   = 1.65 x 10“4 cm2 V-1 s-1, Dm = 5 x 10"6 cm2
`s"1) is plotted. For separation field strengths of <430 V/cm, the
`experimental data correspond well with the calculated values, but
`for separation field strengths of >580 V/cm, the agreement is
`poor. This difference could be due to heating of the microchip,
`as observed in the nonlinear behavior of the linear velocities
`(Figure 4). The power/length in the separation column is also
`plotted in Figure 6 for the corresponding field strengths. Typically
`for electrophoretic systems, when the power/length remains
`interfere with the
`below 1 W/m,24 Joule heating does not
`separation performance. For separation field strengths of >580
`V/cm, the power/length is >1 W/m. Using the last term for Joule
`
`(28) Chien, R-L; Burgi, D. SChromatogr. 1991, 559, 141.
`(29) Chien, R-L; Burgi, D. S, J. Chromatogr. 1991, 559, 153.
`(30) Jacobson, S. C.; Ramsey, J. M. Electrophoresis, in press.
`
`Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 67, No. 13, July 1, 1995
`
`2063
`
`Agilent Exhibit 1282
`Page 5 of 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket