throbber
Anal. Chem. 1994,66,1107-1113
`
`Effects of Injection Schemes and Column Geometry on the
`Performance of Microchip Electrophoresis Devices
`Stephen C. Jacobson/ Roland Hergenroder/ Lance B. Koutny/ R. J. Warmack/ and J. Michael Ramsey*’* 1
`Chemical and Analytical Sciences Division and Health Sciences Research Division, Oak Ridge National
`Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6142
`
`A glass microchip column was fabricated for free-solution
`electrophoresis. The channels were wet chemically etched on
`a substrate using standard photolithographic techniques and
`were sealed using a direct bonding technique. Two methods
`of sample introduction are evaluated employing a cross-type
`channel geometry. With the preferred sample loading method,
`the volume of the sample plug can be accurately controlled and
`is time independent, enabling a constant volume to be injected.
`The injection can be controlled electronically and does not
`induce any electrophoretic mobility based bias. Separations
`were performed on a compact chip with a serpentine column
`geometry that has a 165-mm separation channel in an area
`of less than 10 mm X 10 mm. Band-broadening effects in a
`serpentine column pattern were studied.
`
`The microfabrication of analytical instrumentation provides
`an interesting alternative for chemical sensing. A common
`approach to chemical sensor design is to rely on some general
`physical property observable for quantification, such as an
`electrode current or acoustic wave propagation, and a
`chemically selective coating for chemical specificity.1 Such
`approaches have had limited success with complex mixtures
`of molecular species. The design of high-performance chem-
`ically selective coatings is presently a difficult task. Sensor
`concepts based on conventional
`laboratory approaches to
`chemical measurement problems benefit from a large knowl-
`edge base and thus may be more amendable to a priori designs.
`In addition, microfabricated chemical instruments are likely
`to be more versatile, allowing a single device to address differing
`sensing problems. Microinstrumentation could well derive
`benefits similar to microelectronics, i.e., low cost, compact
`size, high speed,2 and parallel analyses. One avenue for the
`miniaturization of chemical instrumentation is to microma-
`chine a monolithic device using standard lithographic, etching,
`and deposition techniques, i.e., a microchip.3
`Chemical separation techniques appear to be a promising
`area for microinstrumentation. Micromachined columns have
`been fabricated for gas chromatography,4 liquid chromatog-
`raphy,5 and capillary electrophoresis6-9 and evaluated in the
`cases of gas chromatography and capillary electrophoresis.
`* Chemical and Analytical Sciences Division.
`• Health Sciences Research Division.
`(1) Murray, R. W.; Dessy, R. E.; Heineman, W. R.; Janata, J.; Seitz, W. R., Eds.
`Chemical Sensors and Microinstrumentation', ACS Symposium Series 403;
`American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1989.
`(2) Jacobson, S. C.; Hergenrflder, R.; Koutny, L. B.; Ramsey, J. M. Anal. Chem.,
`following paper in this issue.
`(3) Manz, A.; Fettinger, J. C.; Verpoorte, E.; Lfldi, H.; Widmer, H. M.; Harrison,
`D. J. Trends Anal. Chem. 1991, 10, 144.
`(4) Terry, S. C.; Jerman, J. H.; Angell, J. B. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 1979,
`26, 1880.
`
`0003-2700/94/0366-1107S04.50/0
`© 1994 American Chemical Society
`
`Capillary electrophoresis10-13 as an analytical
`technique
`appears the most promising because of the experimental
`simplicity and the dependence of the resolution on the electric
`field strength, not the length of the column. Three aspects
`of microchip electrophoresis are addressed in this paper:
`substrate/cover slip bonding, sample introduction, and column
`geometry.
`Previously,6-9 in order to join the substrate with the etched
`channels and a cover plate, the two pieces had to be melted
`together. Another avenue is direct bonding, which allows the
`surfaces of the substrate and the cover slip to be bonded below
`their melting points. Although not necessary for glass, higher
`melting point substrates, e.g., quartz, can be bonded much
`more easily with such a technique.
`Two drawbacks with conventional capillary electrophoresis
`is that the sample introduction method of exchanging sample
`and buffer reservoirs is time consuming and lacks precision,
`and with an electrokinetic injection scheme, ions with greater
`mobilities are disproportionately introduced in larger quan-
`tities. The mechanical exchange of capillaries among various
`reservoirs is of course not possible with a monolithic micro-
`machined device and alternative injection schemes must be
`used. The concept of using electroosmotic flow to perform
`valveless injections on a microchip electrophoresis device was
`previously described.6-7 This injector was essentially a three-
`port device that performed electrokinetic injections without
`mechanical exchange of capillaries but still with mobility-
`based injection bias. An alternative approach for injection
`on a microchip electrophoresis device was investigated that
`eliminates mobility-based injection bias. Two different modes
`of injector operation were studied. The preferred method
`provides an injection volume that becomes time independent,
`leading to greater injection precision.
`We have also studied the impact of a serpentine separation
`channel geometry on separation efficiency. Band-broadening
`phenomena must be understood to optimize the trade-offs
`between compact device designs and separation performance.
`A straight channel design would minimize contributions from
`
`(5) Manz, A.; Miyahara, Y.; Miura, J.; Watanabe, Y.; Miyagi, H.; Sato, K. Sens.
`Actuators 1990, Bl, 249.
`(6) Manz. A.; Harrison, J.; Verpoorte, E. M. J.; Fettinger, J. C.; Paulus, A.; Lfldi,
`H.; Widmer, H. M. J. Chromatogr. 1992, 593, 253.
`(7) Harrison, D. J.; Manz, A.; Fan, Z.; Lfldi, H.; Widmer, H. M. Anal. Chem.
`1992, 64, 1926.
`(8) Seiler, K.; Harrison, D. J.; Manz, A. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 1481.
`(9) Harrison, D. J.; Fluri, K.; Seiler, K.; Fan, Z.; Effenhauser, C. S.; Manz, A.
`Science 1993, 261, 895.
`(10) Hjerten, S. Chromatogr. Rev. 1967, 9, 122.
`(11) Virtanen, R. Acta Polytech. Scand., Appl. Phys. Ser. 1974, No. 123, 1.
`(12) Mikkers, F.; Everaerts, F.; Verheggen, T. J. Chromatogr. 1979, 169, 11.
`(13) Jorgenson, J. W.; Lukacs, K. D. Anal. Chem. 1981, 53, 1298.
`
`Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 66, No. 7, AprU 1, 1994
`
`1107
`
`Downloaded via UNIV OF VIRGINIA on November 6, 2018 at 17:52:58 (UTC).
`
`See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.
`
`Agilent Exhibit 1279
`Page 1 of 7
`
`

`

`I—
`
`I
`
`substrate
`
`Figure 1. Schematic of serpentine channel geometry for the microchip
`with the large circle representing the cover slip and the smaller circles
`the reservoirs.
`
`electric field and geometric effects whereas alternative layouts
`such as the serpentine pattern used here will minimize device
`dimensions.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
`The column on the microchip was constructed on a 50 mm
`X 25 mm glass microscope slide (Corning, Inc. No. 2947) and
`covered by a 22-mm circular coverslip. The generation of the
`channels involves standard photolithographic procedures
`followed by chemical wet etching.14 The column image was
`transferred onto the slide with a positive photoresist (Shipley
`1811) and an e-beam written chrome mask (Institute of
`Advanced Manufacturing Sciences, Inc.), and the channel
`was chemically wet etched using a HF/NH4F solution. The
`cover slip was then bonded to the slide using a direct bonding
`technique whereby the slide and cover slip surfaces were first
`hydrolyzed in a dilute NH4OH/H2O2 solution and then joined.
`The chip was annealed at 500 °C in order to ensure proper
`adhesion of the cover slip to the slide. Following the bonding,
`cylindrical plastic reservoirs were affixed to the chip using
`epoxy.
`Figure 1 shows a schematic of the column design. The
`channels are designated by the name assigned in Figure 1
`from the terminus up to the intersection of the four channels,
`and each channel has an accompanying reservoir mounted
`above the channel at the edge of the cover slip. The enclosed
`column length is 9.4 mm from the analyte reservoir to the
`injection cross, 9.4 mm from the analyte waste reservoir to
`the injection cross, 6.4 mm from the buffer reservoir to the
`injection cross, and 171 mm from the injection cross to waste
`reservoir. The radius of all of the turns is 0.16 mm. The cross
`section of
`is seen in the scanning electron
`the channel
`
`(14) Ko, W. H.; Suminto, J. T. In 5>/uorr, Gopel, W., Hasse, J., Zennel, J. N. Eds.;
`VCH: Weinhein, Germany, 1989; Vol. 1, pp 107-168.
`
`1108 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 66, No. 7, April 1, 1994
`
`Figure 2. Scanning electron microscope image of a cross section of
`the channel. The bar at the bottom represents a length of 11.1 jim.
`
`microscope image in Figure 2. The dimensions of the channel
`are 10 #im deep, 90 pm wide at the top, and 70 pm wide at
`the bottom.
`Two experimental apparatuses were used to analyze chip
`dynamics via analyte fluorescence. A charge coupled device
`(CCD) camera monitored designated areas of the chip and
`a photomultiplier tube (PMT) tracked single-point events.
`The CCD (Princeton Instruments, Inc. TE/CCD-512TKM)
`camera was mounted on a stereomicroscope (Nikon SMZ-
`U), and the chip was illuminated using an argon ion laser
`(514.5 nm, Coherent Innova 90) operating at 3 W with the
`beam expanded to ~20 mm.
`The point detection scheme
`employed a helium/neon laser (543 nm, PMS Electro-Optics
`LHGP-0051) with an electrometer (Keithley 617) to monitor
`response of the PMT (Oriel 77340). The power supplies
`(Spellman CZE1000R) for the electrophoresis were operated
`between +0.3 and +4.4 kV relative to ground.
`The chip was operated under a “sample loading” mode and
`In the sample loading mode, two types
`a “separation” mode.
`of sample introduction were investigated. For a “floating”
`sample loading, a potential was applied to the analyte reservoir
`with the analyte waste reservoir grounded and with the buffer
`and the waste reservoirs floating. For a “pinched” sample
`loading, potentials were applied to the analyte, the buffer,
`and the waste reservoirs with the analyte waste reservoir
`In the
`grounded in order to control the injection plug shape.
`the potential was applied to the buffer
`separation mode,
`reservoir with the waste reservoir grounded and with analyte
`and analyte waste reservoirs at approximately half of the
`potential of the buffer reservoir.
`The analytes used for the diagnostic experiments were
`rhodamineBandsulforhodamine 101 (Exciton Chemical Co.,
`Inc.) at 60 /uM for the CCD images and 6 jiM for the point
`detection. A sodium tetraborate buffer (50 mM, pH 9.2) was
`the mobile phase in all experiments. The laser dyes studied
`are easily separated, but for the sake of column diagnostics,
`the information is invaluable.
`
`Agilent Exhibit 1279
`Page 2 of 7
`
`

`

`Figure 4. Variation of amount of analyte in injection area with time
`for a pinched sample loading (circle) and a floating sample loading
`(square) using rhodamine B.
`
`this flow pattern. Figure 3c shows a floating sample loading.
`The analyte is pumped from theanalyte reservoir totheanalyte
`waste reservoir as in the pinched sample loading except no
`potential is applied to the buffer and waste reservoirs. By not
`controlling the flow of mobile phase in the buffer and separation
`channels, the analyte is free to move into these channels through
`eddy flow, resulting in a more diffuse injection plug.
`When the pinched and floating sample loadings are
`the pinched sample loading is superior in two
`compared,
`temporal stability and plug length. When two or more
`areas:
`analytes with vastly different mobilities are to be analyzed,
`a sample loading with temporal stability ensures that equal
`volumes of
`the faster and slower moving analytes are
`introduced into the separation column. A smaller plug length
`leads to a higher efFiciency and, consequently, to a greater
`component capacity for a given instrument. To determine
`the temporal stability of each sample loading method, a series
`of CCD fluorescence images was collected at 1.5-s intervals
`starting just prior to the analyte reaching the injection cross.
`An estimate of the amount of analyte that is to be injected
`was determined by integrating the fluorescence in the
`intersection and the buffer and separation channels. This
`integrated fluorescence is plotted versus time in Figure 4. For
`the pinched sample loading (circle), a stability of 1% rsd is
`seen, which is comparable to the stability of the illuminating
`laser. For the floating sample loading (square), the amount
`of analyte to be injected into the column increases with time
`because of the flow anisotropy. For a 30-s loading period, the
`volume of the injection plug in the injection cross is ~90 pL
`and stable for the pinched sample loading versus ~300 pL
`and continuously increasing with time for a floating sample
`loading. When the switch is made to the separation mode,
`some of the analyte in the analyte channel and the analyte
`waste channel is injected into the separation column. For the
`pinched sample loading in Figure 3, the volume of the injection
`plug becomes 144 ± 17 pL with a plug length of 158 ± 19
`Mm following the switch to the separation mode. These
`dimensions are estimated from a series of CCD images taken
`immediately after the switch is made to the separation mode.
`The reproducibility for the two injection modes was tested
`by integrating the area of the band profile following intro-
`duction into the separation channel by monitoring the
`
`Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 66, No. 7, April 1, 1994
`
`1109
`
`1500 .it m I
`(a) CCD image of injection cross with no fluorescent analyte
`Figure 3.
`present: CCD images of same region for (b) a pinched sample loading
`and (c) a floating sample loading using rhodamine B.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`The two types of sample loading were tested for sample
`introduction into the separation column. Rhodamine B was
`used as the test analyte for the sample loading studies. The
`analyte is placed in the analyte reservoir and in both injection
`schemes is pumped in the direction of the analyte waste
`reservoir. CCD images of the two types of injections are
`depicted in Figure 3. Figure 3a is a CCD image of the injection
`cross with no fluorescent sample present. Figure 3b shows
`the pinched sample loading prior to being switched to the
`separation mode where the analyte is pumped electrophoret-
`ically and electroosmotically from the analyte reservoir to the
`analyte waste reservoir (left to right) with the buffer from the
`buffer reservoir
`(top) and the waste reservoir
`(bottom)
`traveling toward the analyte waste reservoir (right). The
`brighter (lighter) portions of the image are due to sample
`fluorescence. The voltages applied to the analyte, buffer,
`analyte waste, and waste reservoirs were 90%, 90%, 0%, and
`100% of the power supply output and correspond to electric
`Field strengths in the channels of 270,400,690, and 20 V/cm
`respectively, for an applied potential of 1.0 k V. Consequently,
`the analyte in the injection cross has a trapezoidal shape and
`is constricted and diluted in analyte waste channel (right) by
`
`Agilent Exhibit 1279
`Page 3 of 7
`
`

`

`time ts]
`
`Figure 5. Reproducibility of (a, top) pinched sample loadings and {b,
`bottom) t loatlng sample loadings for five replicate injections of rhodamine
`B using a separation length of 9 mm and a separation field strength
`of 120 V/cm,
`
`separation channel at a point 9 mm from the intersection. For
`five injections with a duration of 40 s, the reproducibility for
`the pinched sample loading (Figure 5a) is 1.7% rsd and for
`the floating sample loading (Figure 5b) is 2.7% rsd. The
`pinched sample loading, not surprisingly, has a higher
`reproducibility because of the temporal stability. With
`electronically controlled voltage switching, the rsd is expected
`to improve for both schemes. The injection plug length and,
`ultimately, the resolution between analytes depend largely on
`both the flow pattern of the analyte and the dimensions of the
`injection cross. For this column, the channel width is ~80
`(im, but a channel width of 10 /im is feasible which would
`decrease the volume of the injection plug to ~-2 pL with a
`pinched sample loading.
`After the sample has been pumped into the cross region
`of the chip, the voltages are manually switched from the sample
`loading to the separation mode of operation.
`In Figure 6 the
`CCD images record the separation process at
`I-s intervals
`with Figure 6a showing a schematic of the section of the chip
`imaged and with Figure 6b-e showing the separation unfold
`in time. Figure 6b again shows the pinched sample loading
`with the applied voltages at the analyte, buffer, and waste
`reservoirs equal. Parts c-e of Figure 6 show the plug moving
`away from the intersection at 1,2, and 3 s, respectively, after
`In Figure 6c the injection plug is
`switching to run mode.
`migrating around a 90° turn, and band distortion is obvious
`due to the inner portion of the plug traveling less distance in
`
`1116 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 66, No. 7, April 1, 1994
`
`(a) Schematic of region imaged (Injection cross); CCD images
`Figure 6.
`of (b) a pinched sample loading and (c-e) a separation of rhodamine
`B (less retained) and sulforhodamine (more retained) at 1, 2, and 3 s,
`respectively, after switching to the separation mode using a separation
`field strength of 150 V/cm.
`
`the turn than the outer portion. By Figure 6d the analytes
`have separated into distinct bands, which are distorted in the
`shape of a parallelogram.
`In Figure 6e the bands are well
`separated and have attained a more rectangular shape i.e.,
`collapse of the parallelogram due to radial diffusion, an
`additional contribution to efficiency loss.
`When the switch is made from the sample loading mode
`to the separation mode, a clean break of the injection plug
`from the analyte stream is mandatory to avoid tailing. This
`is achieved by pumping the mobile phase from the buffer
`into the analyte, analyte waste, and separation
`channel
`channels simultaneously by maintaining the potential at the
`intersection below the potential of the buffer reservoir and
`above the potentials of the analyte, analyte waste, and waste
`the intersection was
`reservoirs. For
`these experiments,
`maintained at 66% of the potential of the buffer reservoir
`during the run mode. This provided sufficient flow of the
`analyte back away from the injection cross down the analyte
`and analyte waste channels without decreasing the field
`strength in the separation channel significantly. This three-
`way flow is demonstrated in Figure 6c-e as the analytes in
`the analyte and analyte waste channels (left and right,
`
`Agilent Exhibit 1279
`Page 4 of 7
`
`

`

`total = Hinj + Hdet + Hdilt + Hgeo
`
`(1)
`
`where Hmj, H,iet, Hdm, and Hgt0 correspond to the contributions
`to the plate height from the injection plug length, detector
`path length, molecular diffusion in the axial direction, and
`geometry of the column, respectively. The contributions of
`the injection plug length and detector path length are constant,
`the contribution of the axial diffusion depends on the linear
`velocities of the analytes, and the contribution of the column
`geometry depends on the number of turns per unit length in
`the column. The contribution to the plate height from Joule
`heating is neglected because heat dissipation was below 1
`W/m for all experiments.15
`The contributions of the injection plug length and detection
`path length can be calculated by16
`H =
`
`(2)
`
`l2inj/(12L)
`
`H =
`
`l2dJ(12L)
`
`(3)
`
`and Id* are the channel lengths of the injection plug
`where
`and detection path, respectively, and L is the length of the
`separation column between the point of injection and detection.
`Often, these two contributions are negligible compared to the
`other contributions.
`The contribution of the axial diffusion to the band
`broadening follows from the Einstein equation:17
`Him = 2DJu
`
`(4)
`
`where Dm and u are the diffusion coefficient of the analyte
`and the linear velocity of the analyte, respectively. The key
`to minimizing this contribution is performing the separation
`as quickly as possible.
`Less straightforward is the contribution of the geometry
`of the column to the plate height because of the serpentine
`pattern of the column. A geometry such as this serpentine
`enables a significantly greater column length to be employed
`for the separation in a much smaller area (a 165-mm column
`length for the serpentine geometry versus
`~ 10-mm column
`length for a straight geometry in a 10 mm X 10 mm chip
`area). However, by bending the column around 180° turns,
`sacrificing column efficiency for column length becomes a
`concern. We will only consider simple geometrical broadening
`effects here although other contributions such as electric field
`effects are quite feasible, as discussed below. For each turn
`the difference in the length of the column between the inside
`and the outside is
`
`dl = 9 dr
`
`(5)
`
`where 8 is the angle of the turn and dr is the difference in the
`radius of the turn between the inside and the outside of the
`channel, i.e., the channel width. With simple geometrical
`broadening, we assume that the analyte is traveling at the
`
`(15) Monnig, C. A.; Jorgenson, J. W. Anal. Chem. 1991, 63, 802.
`(16) Sternberg, J. C. Adv. Chromatogr. 1966, 2, 205.
`(17) Giddings, J. C. Dynamics of Chromatography, Part I: Principles and Theory,
`Marcel Dekker: New York, 1965; Chapter 2.
`
`Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 66, No. 7, April 1, 1994
`
`1111
`
`time [a]
`Figure 7. Electropherograms at 33 (top), 99 (middle), and 165 mm
`(bottom) from the point of injection for rhodamine B (less retained) and
`sulforhodamine (more retained) using a separation field strength of
`170 V/cm and pinched sample loading. The electropherograms have
`been offset vertically to facilitate viewing.
`
`Figure 8. Variation of the plate number with separation channel length
`for rhodamine B (circle) and sulforhodamine (square) with best linear
`fits (line) using a separation field strength of 170 V/cm and pinched
`sample loading.
`
`respectively) move farther away from the intersection with
`time. Three-way flow permits well-defined, reproducible
`injections (Figure 5) with minimal bleeding of the analyte
`into the separation channel.
`To obtain electropherograms in the conventional manner,
`single-point detection with the helium/neon laser was used at
`different locations down the axis of the separation column.
`The efficiency at 10 evenly spaced positions was monitored,
`each constituting a separate experiment. Figure 7 depicts
`selected electropherograms at 33, 99, and 165 mm from the
`point of injection.' The efficiency data are plotted in Figure
`8. At 165 mm from the point of injection, the efficiencies of
`rhodamine B and sulforhodamine are 38 100 and 29 000 plates,
`respectively. Efficiencies of this magnitude are sufficient for
`many separation applications. The linearity of the data
`provides information about the uniformity and quality of the
`If a defect in the
`channel down the length of the column.
`channel, e.g., a large etch pit, was present, a sharp decrease
`in the efficiency would result. This is not the case.
`The primary contributions to band broadening for these
`experiments are shown in the following equation for the total
`plate height:
`
`Agilent Exhibit 1279
`Page 5 of 7
`
`

`

`same velocity on both the inside of the column and the outside
`of the column through the turn. Consequently, the shift or
`distortion in the band profile is equivalent to d/ in eq 5.
`For the 90® turn immediately following the injection cross
`in the separation channel (Figure 6a), 6 and dr are equal to
`7r/2 and 90 pm, respectively, and consequently, dl is 140 pm,
`which should be the contribution to band broadening for this
`one turn. From the experimental data in Figure 6d, the shift
`in the band shape is calculated from the center of the bands
`for each row of pixels from this CCD image, and the band
`distortion is estimated to be 150 pm. The slight discrepancy
`(7%) can be attributed to the nonrectangular injection plug.
`The geometry of the turns could also produce an additional
`distortion due to spatially varying electric field strengths within
`the turn. Thus, an ion on the inside of the turn would
`experience a higher electric field than an ion on the outside
`of a turn, resulting in a greater linear velocity for the ion on
`the inside. Coupled with the difference in the lengths of travel,
`an ion on the inside of a turn and an ion on the outside would
`be separated by a distance 2d/ following a turn, e.g. 280 /am
`for a 90® turn. This distortion is too large compared to the
`experimentally measured band distortion of 150 pm observed
`in Figure 6d.
`Consequently, the contribution to the plate height equation
`due to the turns in the serpentine pattern of the separation
`column is written as follows:
`
`Hgeo = n(w6)2/(l2L)
`
`(6)
`
`where n is the number of identical turns, w is the width at the
`top of the channel, and 6 is the angle of a single turn. The
`transit time between turns is assumed to be long compared
`to the time to diffuse across the channel. Therefore the position
`of an individual molecule in the cross section of the channel,
`from turn to turn, is random, and Hgeo is a function of n rather
`than n2.18 Assuming the number of turns per unit distance
`then Hgeo will be constant.
`Importantly, this
`is constant,
`contribution to the plate height decreases as the square of the
`channel width.
`The contributions from injection plug length, detector path
`for a given
`length, and column geometry are constant
`experiment while the contribution from the axial diffusion
`In Figure 9, the
`decreases with increasing linear velocity.
`linear velocity data demonstrate an
`plate height versus
`increasing efficiency with increasing linear velocity. The three
`constant terms are combined, added to an axial diffusion term,
`and fitted to the experimental data. The sum of the three
`constant contributions for rhodamine B and sulforhodamine
`respectively, and the diffusion
`are 4.02 and 5.39 pm,
`coefficients, Dm, are 3.27 X 10-6 and 3.33 X 10-6 cm2/s,
`respectively.
`The individual constant plate height contributions for this
`experiment are estimated. The injection plug length is equal
`from eq
`to 300 pm for the the injection in Figure 6, and
`2 is 0.23 pm. Since the detection is on-column, the detector
`path length is equal to the laser spot size, which is ~ 100 pm.
`Because the
`to 25 nm.
`Therefore, Hdet
`is equal
`(eq 3)
`separation was monitored at a distance 33 mm from the point
`
`(18) Giddings, J. C. J. Chem. Educ. 1958, 35, 588.
`
`1112 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 66, No. 7, April 1, 1994
`
`Figure 9. Variation of the plate height (H) with linear velocity (u) for
`rhodamine B (circle) and sulforhodamine (square) with best fits of eq
`1 (lines) using a separation length of 33 mm and pinched sample
`loading.
`
`of injection, the separation column includes one 90® turn
`(described above) and four 180° turns. Using eq 6, Hgeo is
`equal to 0.85 /am.
`The fitted constant values from the data in Figure 9,4.02
`for rhodamine B and 5.39 for sulforhodamine, are not equal
`and are both greater than the sum of the three estimated
`constant contributions of 0.90 pm. Limitations of the present
`apparatus prevented the use of field strengths greater than
`170 V/cm, and therefore, more comprehensive data could not
`be generated.
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`The use of microchip devices for liquid-phase separations
`and analysis appears to be quite promising. Several important
`aspects for improving the performance of these devices were
`discussed in this work. Cold bonding of cover plates to enclose
`micromachined channels will allow the use of a broad range
`of substrate materials and could lead to greater device yields.
`An injection scheme was presented that provides high
`performance with respect to accuracy, precision, and small
`volume while remaining simplistic with respect to fabrication.
`The device used in these studies has a smaller area/column
`length ratio than previously reported due to the use of a
`serpentine column geometry.6-9 The use of such geometries
`will be necessary to move microchip liquid-phase analysis
`devices into the sensor
`realm. Band-broadening phenomena
`associated with the serpentine structure, while measurable,
`do not appear to be a severely limiting problem for capillary
`electrophoresis implementations employing field strengths less
`than ~200 V/cm. The plate height associated with the
`serpentine geometry was experimentally measured and found
`to be approximately what would be expected for path length
`differences associated with the turns. This additional plate
`1 pm for the 165-mm column
`height was calculated to be ~
`length. Reduction in channel widths should allow reduction
`of this effect to an acceptable level.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`This research was sponsored by the U.S. Department of
`Energy (DOE), Office of Research and Development. Oak
`Ridge National Laboratory is managed by Martin Marietta
`
`Agilent Exhibit 1279
`Page 6 of 7
`
`

`

`Energy Systems, Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy
`under Contract DE-AC05-840R21400. Also, this research
`was sponsored in part by an appointment for S.C.J. to the
`Alexander Hollaender Distinguished Postdoctoral Fellowship
`Program sponsored by the U.S. DOE, for L.B.K. to the DOE
`Laboratory Cooperative Postgraduate Research Training
`Program, and for R.H. to the ORNL postdoctoral research
`associate program. These programs are administered by the
`
`Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education and ORNL.
`The authors acknowledge many useful discussions with Drs.
`Roswitha S. Ramsey and Georges Guiochon.
`
`Received for
`1994.®
`
`review October 5, 1993. Accepted January 10,
`
`'Abstract published in Advance ACS Abstracts, February IS, 1994.
`
`Analytical Chemistry, Vd. 66, No. 7, April 1, 1994
`
`1113
`
`Agilent Exhibit 1279
`Page 7 of 7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket