throbber
Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 1197-1203
`
`Rapid Sizing of Short Tandem Repeat Alleles Using
`Capillary Array Electrophoresis and
`Energy-Transfer Fluorescent Primers
`Yiwen Wang,™ Jingyue Ju,f Brooke A. Carpenter,* Jeanette M. Atherton,*
`George F. Sensabaugh,* and Richard A. Mathies™
`Department of Chemistry and Forensic Science Group, School of Public Health, University of California,
`Berkeley, California 94720
`
`Genetic typing of the short tandem repeat (STR) polymor-
`phism HUMTHOl has been performed using capillary
`array electrophoresis and energy-transfer fluorescent dye-
`labeled polymerase chain reaction primers. Target alleles
`were amplified by use of primers labeled with one
`fluorescein at the 5' end and another fluorescein at the
`position of the 15th (modified) base to produce fragments
`that fluoresce in the green (/max = 525 nm). Unknown
`alleles were electrophoretically separated together with a
`standard ladder made up of alleles having 6, 7, 8, and 9
`four-base pair repeats, each of which was amplified with
`an energy-transfer primer having a donor fluorescein at
`the 5' end and a rhodamine acceptor at the position of
`the 7th (modified) base to produce standard fragments
`fluorescing in the red (>590 nm). Separations were
`performed on arrays of hollow fused-silica capillaries filled
`with a replaceable sieving matrix consisting of 0.8%
`hydroxyethyl cellulose plus 1 piM 9-aminoacridine to
`enhance the resolution. The labeled DNA fragments were
`excited at 488 nm, and the fluorescence was detected with
`a two-color confocal fluorescence scanner.
`Separations
`are complete in less than 20 min and allow sizing with
`an average absolute error or accuracy of less than 0.4 base
`pair and an average standard deviation of ~0.5 base pair
`with no correction for mobility shift and cross-talk between
`the fluorescence channels. This work establishes the
`feasibility of high-speed, high-throughput STR typing of
`double-stranded DNA fragments using capillary array
`electrophoresis.
`
`DNA sequences containing di-, tri-, tetra-, and pentanucleotide
`repeats are often genetically polymorphic.* 1 2"3 Over 2000 of these
`short tandem repeat (STR) polymorphisms have been mapped
`on the human genome,4 and it is estimated that thousands more
`remain to be discovered.5 Because of the abundance of this type
`of polymorphism and the relative ease of STR detection following
`
`f Department of Chemistry.
`* Performed as a part of the Ph.D. research of Y.W. in the Graduate Group in
`Biophysics.
`§ Forensic Science Group.
`(1) Tautz, D. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989, 17, 6463-6471.
`(2) Edwards, A; Civitello, A; Hammond, H. A; Caskey, C. T. Am. J. Hum. Genet.
`1991, 49, 746-756.
`(3) Charlesworth, B.; Sniegowski, P.; Stephan, W. Nature 1994, 371, 215-
`220.
`(4) Gyapay, G.; Morissette, J.; Vignal, A; Dib, C.; Fizames, C.; Millasseau, P.;
`Marc, S.; Bemardi, G.; Lathrop, M.; Weissenbach, J. Nat. Genet. 1994, 7,
`246-339.
`
`amplification by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), STRs have
`found widespread use as markers in gene mapping studies4 and
`are emerging as potential markers for use in testing for paternity
`and personal identity.6 *"9
`The analysis of STR markers in gene mapping and in the
`development of population polymorphism data banks is typically
`performed by slab gel electrophoresis. As the number of inter-
`rogated STR markers increases and as one desires to have a more
`complete polymorphism data base, the speed, throughput, and
`sample handling associated with slab gels becomes limiting. One
`approach for increasing the speed and throughput of
`these
`electrophoretic separations is through the use of capillary array
`the speed of
`In this technique,
`electrophoresis (CAE).10"12
`electrophoretic separations is increased ~10-fold through the use
`of high electric fields, and the throughput is increased by using
`large numbers of capillaries in an array. High sensitivity detection
`of fluorescently labeled DNA fragments is achieved through the
`use of a laser-excited, confocal-fluorescence scanner.13 An ad-
`ditional advantage of CAE is that samples are easily loaded in
`parallel through standard electrokinetic injection techniques. Thus
`far, CAE has been used for DNA sequencing1011 and for DNA
`fragment sizing,1415 but it has not been used to analyze STRs.
`In this paper, we explore the development of methods for rapid
`to determine
`STR sizing on capillary arrays. One goal was
`whether accurate sizing can be performed by separating ds-DNA
`fragments on capillaries containing easily replaceable nondena-
`If suc-
`turing hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) sieving solutions.
`cessful, this would dramatically increase the speed of separations
`and simplify the separation procedures by eliminating the need
`for denaturing columns. We show here that, by using the
`appropriate separation buffer and labeling methods, sizing of
`
`(5) Beckmann, J. S.; Weber, J. L. Genomics 1992, 12, 627-631.
`(6) Hammond, H. A; Jin, L.; Zhong, Y.; Caskey, C. T.; Chakraborty, R Am. J.
`Hum. Genet. 1994, 55, 175-189.
`(7) Kimpton, C. P.; Gill, P.; Walton, A; Urquhart, A; Millican, E. S.; Adams, M.
`PCR Methods Appl. 1993, 3, 13-22.
`(8) Fregeau, C. J.; Foumey, R M. BioTechniques 1993, 15, 100-119.
`(9) Alford, R L.; Hammond, H. A; Coto, I.; Caskey, C. T. Am. J. Hum. Genet.
`1994, 55, 190-195.
`(10) Huang, X. C.; Quesada, M. A; Mathies, R A Anal. Chem. 1992, 64, 967-
`972.
`(11) Huang, X. C.; Quesada, M. A; Mathies, R A Anal. Chem. 1992, 64,2149-
`2154.
`(12) Mathies, R A; Huang, X. C. Nature (London) 1992, 359, 167-169.
`(13) Quesada, M. A; Rye, H. S.; Gingrich, J. C.; Glazer, A N.; Mathies, R A
`BioTechniques 1991, 10, 616—625.
`(14) Clark, S. M.; Mathies, R A Anal. Biochem. 1993, 215, 163-170.
`(15) Zhu, H.; Clark, S. M.; Benson, S. C.; Rye, H. S.; Glazer, A N.; Mathies, R
`A Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 1941-1948.
`
`0003-2700/95/0367-1197$9.00/0 © 1995 American Chemical Society
`
`Analytical Chemistry, Vot. 67, No. 7, April 1, 1995 1197
`
`Downloaded via UNIV OF VIRGINIA on November 6, 2018 at 17:48:19 (UTC).
`
`See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.
`
`Agilent Exhibit 1272
`Page 1 of 7
`
`

`

`alleles of the human tyrosine hydroxylase locus THOl differing
`by a single base pair can be achieved. A second goal was to
`develop methods for two-color labeling and detection so that a
`standard STR ladder could be electrophoresed along with the
`unknown amplified alleles. We have accomplished this by
`amplifying the standard THOl allelic ladder and the unknown with
`the energy-transfer (ET) dye-labeled primers recently developed
`by Ju and co-workers.16 ET primers are valuable because they
`absorb strongly at a common laser wavelength while also exhibit-
`ing intense and nonoverlapping emissions. The THOl allelic
`sizing experiments presented here validate the use of energy-
`transfer dye-labeled primers together with capillary array elec-
`trophoresis for rapid and high-throughput STR sizing.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
`Instrumentation. Capillary array electrophoresis separations
`were detected with the laser-excited, confocal-fluorescence scan-
`ner as previously described by Huang et al.10,11 Briefly, excitation
`light at 488 nm from an argon ion laser is reflected by a long-
`pass dichroic beam splitter, passed through a 32 x, NA 0.4
`microscope objective, and brought to a 10 wm diameter focus
`within the 75 pm i.d. capillaries in the capillary array. The
`fluorescence is collected by the objective, passed back through
`the first beam splitter to a second dichroic beam splitter that
`separates the red (A > 565 nm) and green (A < 565 nm) detection
`channels. The emission is then focused on 400 urn diameter
`confocal pinholes, spectrally filtered by a 590-nm long-pass filter
`(red channel) or a 20-nm band-pass filter centered at 520 nm
`followed by photomultiplier detection. The
`(green channel),
`output is preamplified, filtered, digitized, and then stored in an
`IBM PS/2 computer. A computer-controlled stage is used to
`translate the capillary array past the optical system at 20 mm/s.
`The fluorescence is sampled unidirectionally at 1500 Hz/channel.
`The scanner
`construction and operation have recently been
`described in detail.17 Postacquisition image processing was
`performed with the programs IPLab, KaleidaGraph, and Canvas.
`fused-
`Capillary Electrophoresis. Polyacrylamide-coated,
`silica capillaries were prepared using a modification of
`the
`procedure described by Hjerten.18 A 2-3 mm wide detection
`window was produced by burning off the polyimide coating with
`a hot wire followed by cleaning the external surface with ethanol.
`The detection window was placed 25 cm from the injection ends
`of the 75 /rm i-d., 350 /rm o.d., 50 cm long fused-silica capillaries
`(Polymicro Technologies, Phoenix, AZ). The inner walls of the
`capillaries were incubated with 1 N NaOH for 30 min at room
`followed by rinsing with deionized water. The
`temperature,
`capillaries were then treated overnight at room temperature with
`•/-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (1:250 dilution with H2O
`adjusted to pH 3.5 with acetic acid) to derivatize the walls for
`polyacrylamide binding. Freshly made 4% T acrylamide solution
`in V2X TBE buffer (45 mM tris, 45 mM boric acid, 1 mM EDTA,
`pH 8.3) was filtered with a 0.2-^m syringe filter and degassed
`under vacuum for 30 min. NJVJf /V’-Tetramethylethylenediamine
`CTEMED; 1 piL) and 10 uL of 10% ammonium persulfate (APS)
`solution were added to 1 mL of gel solution. The solution was
`immediately forced into the capillary with a 100-mL syringe. After
`
`(16) Ju, J.; Ruan, C.; Fuller, C. W.; Glazer, A. N.; Mathies, R. A Proc. Natl. Acad.
`Sci. U.S.A., in press.
`(17) Mathies, R. A; Scherer, J. R.; Quesada, M. A; Rye, H. S.; Glazer, A N. Rev.
`Sci. Instrum. 1994, 65, 807—812.
`(18) Hjerten, S./. Chromatogr. 1985, 347, 191-198.
`
`1198 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 67, No. 7, April 1, 1995
`
`30 min, the polyacrylamide solution was flushed out with deionized
`water and capillaries were filled with buffer consisting of hydroxy-
`ethyl cellulose (HEC; M?. = 438 000, Aqualon Co. Hopewell, VA)
`dissolved in 'Ax TBE. The separation buffer was prepared by
`adding 0.8 g of HEC to 100 mL of 'Ax TBE and dissolved by
`stirring overnight at room temperature.14 The HEC buffer was
`degassed under vacuum for 30 min, centrifuged for 20 min on a
`tabletop centrifuge, and drawn into a lOO/tL syringe, and 3 uL
`was injected into each capillary. Capillaries were prerun at 80
`V/cm for 5 min before each experiment. Diluted and deionized
`PCR samples were injected by inserting the capillary in a 5-«L
`sample volume held in an Eppendorf tube followed by electroki-
`netic injection (80 V/cm for 3 s). After injection, the sample tubes
`were replaced with tubes containing 0.8% HEC plus V2x TBE
`buffer. Electrophoresis was performed at 80 V/cm using five-
`capillary arrays held at ambient temperature (22 °C). The low
`(80 V/cm) electrophoresis voltage was used to avoid undersam-
`pling of the bands with our current detection system, which is
`limited to 1-Hz scan rates. When the experiments were complete,
`capillaries were flushed with water and then with methanol,
`followed by drying. Our coated capillaries could be refilled 20-
`25 times before the quality of the separations deteriorated.
`Methods for the further extension of the lifetime of capillary
`columns have been described.19
`PCR Amplification of THOl Loci. DNA was isolated from
`blood by using standard methods.20 The human tyrosine hy-
`location llpl5.5,
`droxylase locus HUMTHOl, chromosomal
`contains a polymorphic four-base STR sequence (AATG) in intron
`l.21 PCR amplification of this polymorphic region produces allelic
`fragments designated 5-11, according to the number of AATG
`repeats; an additional allele designated 9.3 differs from allele 10
`by a single base deletion. The primer sequences used for PCR
`are 5'-ATTCAAAGGGTATCTGGGCTCTGG-3' (THOl-A) and 5'-
`GTGGGCTGAAAAGCTCCCGATTAT-3' (THOl-B).2 PCR ampli-
`fications were performed in 50-mL volumes by using 10 ng of
`genomic DNA template, 0.5 pM of each primer, 5 units of Taq
`DNA polymerase, 50 mM KC1,1.5 mM MgCl2,10 mM Tris-HCl
`at pH 8.3, and 200 «M dNTPs (final concentrations indicated).
`The PCR cycle protocol using a Perkin-Elmer Cetus Model 480
`(1) melting at 95 °C for 5 min; (2) 30 cycles of 95
`was as follows:
`°C for 1 min, 58 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min; (3) 72 °C for
`7 min to complete extention. The PCR sample was then dialyzed
`for 30 min by pipeting 8-10 uL onto a 0.10-^m VCWP membrane
`filter (Millipore, Bedford, MA), which was floated on deionized
`water in a beaker held at 4 °C. Dialysis was used to remove
`salts
`which can interfere with sample injection. Following dialysis, the
`samples were diluted with deionized water 100-1000 times
`(depending on product concentration) before electrokinetic injec-
`tion. The amplifications with fluorescently labeled primers were
`Initially, four sets of fluores-
`also performed as described above.
`cent primers were used for PCR amplification and the mobility
`shifts of the products were evaluated with capillary electrophore-
`sis. For these mobility shift experiments, 1-2 ng of unlabeled
`reamplified by 20 PCR cycles using the
`PCR product was
`
`(19) Schmalzing, D.; Piggee, C. A; Foret, F.; Carrilho, E.; Karger, B. L. J.
`Chromatogr. 1993, 652, 149-159.
`(20) Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E. F.; Maniatis, T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory
`manual, 2nd ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: Cold Spring Harbor, NY,
`1989.
`(21) Puers, C.; Hammond, H. A; Jin, L.; Caskey, C. T.; Schumm, J. W. Am. J.
`Hum. Genet. 1993, 53, 953-958.
`
`Agilent Exhibit 1272
`Page 2 of 7
`
`

`

`Chart 1. Structures of the Six PCR Primers Used
`for the Amplification of the HUMTH01 Loci"
`F10F
`FAM-5'-ATTCAAAGGGT"ATCTGGGCTCTGG-3'
`
`(CH)2(CO)-NH-(CH2)g-NH-FAM
`
`F14F
`
`FAM-5'-GTGGGCTGAAAAGCTCCCGATTAT-3‘
`
`(CH)2(CO)-NH-(CH2)6-NH-FAM
`
`F2R
`
`F6R
`
`FAM-5-ATj’CAAAGGGTATCTGGGCTCTGG
`(CH)2(CO)-NH-(CH2)6-NH-ROX
`
`-3'
`
`FAM-5-GTGGGCT'GAAAAGCTCCCGATTAT-3'
`<i!;h)2(co)-nh-(ch2)6-nh-rox
`
`TH01 -A
`
`5'-ATTCAAAGGGT ATCTGGGCTCTGG -3'
`
`TH01-B
`5'-GTGGGCTGAAAAGCTCCCGATTAT -3'
`a The fluorescent primers are labeled with a common fluores-
`cein donor (F) at the 5' end and either a second fluorescein or a
`rhodamine (R) acceptor at the indicated locations of a modified
`T in the sequence. The number of nucleotides between the two
`fluorophores is indicated in the primer designation
`
`appropriate fluorescent primers. THOl types for all samples used
`in this study were independently determined by analysis on slab
`gels essentially as described by Puers.21 Standard reference alleles
`were determined by sequence analysis (M. Savill and G. Sensa-
`baugh, unpublished).
`Design and Synthesis of PCR Printers. Chemicals were
`purchased from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). Oligode-
`oxynucleotides were synthesized by the phosphoramidite method
`on an Applied Biosystems 392 DNA synthesizer. The structures
`of two unlabeled (THOl-A and IHOl-B) and four energy-transfer
`dye-labeled PCR primers are presented in Chart 1. The nomen-
`clature and procedures for preparing and purifying energy-transfer
`fluorescent primers have been described by Ju et al.16 The F10F
`and F14F primers required for the studies reported here were
`synthesized with the incorporation of two 5-carboxyfluorescein
`(FAM) fluorophores at the locations indicated in Chart 1. The
`F2R and F6R primers were similarly prepared with the incorpora-
`tion of FAM as a donor and 6-carboxy-X-rhodamine (ROX) as an
`acceptor.
`The energy-transfer dye-labeled primers are advantageous for
`two-color fragment sizing because the 488-nm exciting light is
`optimally absorbed by the FAM chromophore in these primers
`followed by enhanced emission at the FAM wavelength in the
`case of F10F and F14F or very distinctively Stokes-shifted emission
`following energy transfer in the case of F2R and F6R. Absorption
`spectra of the primers were measured on a Perkin-Elmer Lambda
`6 UV-visible spectrophotometer and fluorescence emission
`spectra were taken on a Perkin-Elmer Model MPF 44B spectro-
`fluorimeter. As representative examples, spectra of F14F and the
`energy-transfer dye-labeled primer F6R are presented in Figure
`1. F14F exhibits strong absorption at ~488 nm and intense
`fluorescence emission with a maximum at 525 nm.
`F6R also
`exhibits intense absorption at 488 nm, but because of
`the
`fluorescein-to-rhodamine fluorescence energy transfer, the emis-
`sion maximum is shifted out to ~600 nm. Primers were dissolved
`in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA buffer at a final concentration
`of 10 pmol/wL for PCR reactions.
`
`Figure 1. Absorption (—) and fluorescence emission (—) spectra
`of the fluorescently labeled THOl primers F14F and F6R measured
`in 1 x TBE. F14F exhibits strong absorption at ~488 nm and intense
`fluorescence emission with a maximum at 525 nm. F6R also exhibits
`intense absorption at ~488 nm, but the maximum emission is shifted
`out to ~600 nm.
`
`Figure 2. Electropherograms of (A) the TH01 standard ladder
`consisting of the 6, 7, 8, and 9 alleles which have been mixed and
`then coinjected with a OX-174 RF DNA-H/nd I digest. (B) Standard
`allelic ladder spiked with “unknown” allele 7. (C) Standard allelic ladder
`spiked with allele 9. (D) Standard allelic ladder spiked with alleles 7
`and 8. (E) Standard allelic ladder spiked with alleles 9 and 9.3. These
`separations were run with 0.8% HEC, V2X TBE, and 1 fiM thiazole
`orange in the running buffer and detected in the green channel. The
`additional weak peaks appearing at detection times greater than ~17
`min are due to heteroduplex formation.
`
`Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 67, No. 7, April 1, 1995
`
`1199
`
`Agilent Exhibit 1272
`Page 3 of 7
`
`

`

`Time (minutes)
`Figure 3. Comparison of the mobility shift using five different
`methods for attaching energy-transfer-coupled fluorophores to TH01
`target alleles 6 and 9.3. The green line indicates the fluorescence
`intensity in the green channel, and the red line indicates the intensity
`in the red channel. The structures of the primer sets used are
`indicated. Electrophoresis was performed using 0.8% HEC, 'fax TBE,
`and 1
`9-AA in the running buffer.
`
`Time (minutes)
`Figure 4. Electropherograms of standard TH01 allelic ladder
`separations using three different running buffers. (A) 0.8% HEC plus
`'fax TBE. (B) 0.8% HEC plus 'fax TBE and 1 tiM thiazole orange.
`The additional peaks at 15.2 and 17.1 min in this run are due to OX-
`174 RF DNA-H/ndl DNA. (C) 0.8% HEC plus 'fax TBE and 1 pM
`9-AA. The standard ladder was amplified with F6R and detected in
`the red channel.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`One-Color Sizing of THOl Alleles. Figure 2 presents
`capillary array electrophoresis separations of the standard THOl
`ladder that has been labeled on-column with the intercalating
`fluorophore, thiazole orange (TO).22 To form this standard ladder,
`two individual heterozygote samples containing alleles 6 + 9 and
`7 + 8 were amplified and mixed. Trace A presents the electro-
`pherogram of the allelic ladder which was injected along with a
`d>X-174 RF DNA-tfmdl restriction digest (Pharmacia, Pisca-
`taway, NJ) as a control. The four alleles which are 4 bp apart are
`nearly baseline-resolved with a separation time of less than 17
`In trace B, an “unknown” PCR-amplified sample is added to
`min.
`the allelic ladder and coinjected. The increased intensity of allele
`7 identifies the unknown allele. Traces C—E in Figure 2 similarly
`demonstrate the detection of samples containing alleles 9, 7 + 8,
`and 9 + 9.3. This work demonstrates the feasibility of producing
`the THOl ladder for allelic typing with capillary array electro-
`phoresis using nondenaturing HEC separation matrices. The use
`of a standard allelic ladder to perform accurate sizing has
`previously been reported.2'21 High-resolution separation of ds-
`DNA fragments on capillary columns has also been demonstrated
`
`(22) Rye, H. S.; Quesada, M. A; Peck, K.; Mathies, R. A; Glazer, A N. Nucleic
`Acids Res. 1991, 19, 327-333.
`
`1200 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 67, No. 7, April 1, 1995
`

`
`Figure 5. Resolution of the TH01 ladder as a function of 9-ami-
`noacridine concentration. The resolution of last two adjacent peaks
`(8, 9) in the TH01 allelic ladder was calculated using the equation R
`(T2 - Ti) x 1.18/(fwhhi + fwhh2), where Tand fwhh are the peak
`migration time and full width at half height, respectively. The TH01
`ladder was amplified with F6R as described in the text and separated
`on 0.8% HEC at 80 V/cm.
`
`=
`
`by McCord and co-workers.23'24 However, for one-color labeling
`of the allelic ladder and unknown to work reliably and precisely,
`it is necessary to have good control over
`the concentration of the
`
`Agilent Exhibit 1272
`Page 4 of 7
`
`

`

`67e9
`
`Red Channel
`4
`2
`3
`
`1
`
`5
`
`1
`
`Green Channel
`4
`2
`3
`
`5
`
`15 min
`
`17 min
`
`19 min
`
`Images of the fluorescence from a five-capillary array separation of THOI alleles. The left image presents the fluorescence signal
`Figure 6.
`as a function of time detected in the red (>590 nm) channel, and the right image presents the fluorescence signal from the green (Amax = 525
`nm) channel. The standard THOI allelic ladder (6 + 7 + 8 + 9) was amplified with the red-emitting ET primer F6R and detected in the red
`channel; unknown alleles were amplified with the green-emitting primer F14F and detected in the green channel. These images have been
`adjusted for the 1 -2% capillary-to-capillary variance in mobility by shifting the time axes so that the allelic ladder is detected at the same time
`9-AA in the running buffer at 80 V/cm.
`in all capillaries. These separations were performed with 0.8% HEC and 1
`
`DNA in the unknown samples. Alternatively, one could use a
`nonallelic ladder as the standard but there could be some loss of
`accuracy in the resulting interpolation.
`Evaluation of Energy-Transfer Primer Labeling. For
`routine sizing experiments, it is desirable to perform two-color
`detection where the allelic standards are amplified with one
`fluorescent primer and the unknowns are amplified with a second
`fluorescent primer having a distinctive emission. Ju and co-
`workers16 recently reported the synthesis and use of a new class
`of fluorescent primers labeled with pairs of dye molecules that
`are coupled by fluorescence energy transfer. These ET primers
`have the advantage of providing strong absorption at a common
`laser excitation wavelength (488 nm). Following the fluorescence
`energy transfer, the ET primers emit at a Stokes-shifted wave-
`length determined by the properties of the acceptor. Thus, the
`fluorescence emission of the ET primers is very intense, and the
`emission spectra of the different ET dye-labeled primers are
`distinctively Stokes-shifted. These primers have been shown to
`
`(23) McCord, B. R.: McClure, D. L; Jung, J. M. /. Chmmatogr. A 1993, 652,
`75-82.
`(24) McCord, B. R.; Jung, J. M.; Holleran. E. A ]. I.iq. Chmmatogr. 1993, 16,
`1963-1981.
`
`provide 2-6 times the signal strength compared to conventional
`single dye-labeled fluorescent primers in DNA sequencing ap-
`plications.16 Furthermore, the mobility shift of DNA fragments
`generated with ET primers depends on the spacing between the
`dyes. We therefore performed experiments to evaluate the
`mobility shift of the amplified fragments for all combinations of
`singly and doubly labeled targets.
`In trace A of Figure 3, both strands of the amplified 6 and 9.3
`In one case, the F10F primer is
`targets have been labeled.
`extended to form the (+) strand and the F14F primer is extended
`to form the (-) strand producing the green-emitting fragments.
`In the second case, the ET dye-labeled primer F2R is extended
`to produce the (+) strand and F6R is used to extend the (-)
`strand producing the red-emitting fragments. These fragments
`were mixed and electrophoresed on HEC-filled capillaries in the
`presence of 1 /<M 9-aminoacridine (9AA, see below). The mobility
`shift between the green fragments and the red fragments in trace
`found to be ~2 bp. We therefore decided to evaluate
`A was
`amplifying with just one fluorescent primer per ds-DNA fragment
`to see if a particular combination of labels would reduce the
`mobility shift. Trace B in Figure 3 shows that amplifying the (-)
`
`Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 67, No. 7, April 1, 1995
`
`1201
`
`Agilent Exhibit 1272
`Page 5 of 7
`
`

`

`strand with the F14F primer or with the F6R primer generates
`fragments having almost no mobility shift (<0.3 bp) between the
`green- and the red-labeled fragments. The two other labeling
`methods shown in traces C and D resulted in larger mobility shifts.
`However, amplifying the (-) strand with F6R and the (+) strand
`with F10F also produced fragments having almost no mobility
`shift (trace E). We decided to perform the subsequent experi-
`ments using the labeling method illustrated in trace B because
`these fragments are labeled on the same strand and can thus also
`be sized under denaturing conditions if necessary.
`Resolution Enhancement with 9-Aminoacridine. To achieve
`satisfactory resolution of the THOl allelic ladder, we found it
`necessary to include an intercalating dye in the running buffer.
`Trace A of Figure 4 shows that poor resolution is obtained when
`the allelic ladder (amplified with the F6R primer) is run in 0.8%
`HEC alone. Trace B shows the separation of the same ladder in
`0.8% HEC plus 1 «M of the intercalating dye thiazole orange. The
`resolution of the separation in the presence of TO is dramatically
`enhanced. Electrophoresis in the presence of the intercalator
`ethidium bromide has also been shown to improve the electro-
`phoretic resolution of ds-DNA25-26 Unfortunately, TO contributes
`in the green channel of our
`to the signal
`two-color detection
`system, rendering it unsuitable for use in the desired two-color
`It is thus necessary to use a nonfluorescent
`labeling scheme.
`In electrophoretic separa-
`intercalator to improve the resolution.
`tions of preformed dimeric dye-DNA complexes, Zhu et al.15
`observed that the addition of the nonfluorescent dye 9-aminoacri-
`dine (9-AA) can be used to dramatically improve ds-DNA separa-
`tions much like TO and ethidium. We therefore decided to
`evaluate the effect of 9-AA Trace C of Figure 4 presents a
`separation of the THOl allelic ladder when the column is filled
`with 0.8% HEC and 1 pM 9-AA This separation is as good as
`that obtained in the presence of TO. The dependence of the
`resolution of the THOl ladder separation on 9-AA concentration
`is presented in Figure 5. The resolution improves significantly
`up to 1 pM 9-AA and is only slighdy better at 5 «M. 9-AA
`concentrations above 50 /<M were found to quench the fluores-
`cence.
`Two-Color THOl Sizing with Capillary Array Electro-
`phoresis. Figure 6 presents the results of a typical THOl sizing
`experiment performed using two-color capillary array electro-
`phoresis, The standard allelic ladder was amplified with F6R and
`detected in the red channel, while the unknown alleles were
`amplified with F14F and detected in the green channel. The signal
`detected as a function of time is presented as two images:
`the
`left image is the signal in the red channel and the right image is
`that detected in the green channel. The alleles appear ~17 min
`after injection. The signal in the red channel is predominantly
`from the red-labeled standard ladder, and the expected four band
`patterns are seen in all capillaries. The unknown, amplified with
`the green-emitting primer,
`is detected in the green channel.
`Allelic bands are identified as the intense green bands coinciding
`in mobility with allelic ladder bands in the red channel. To
`illustrate, the right image of Figure 6 reveals intense green bands
`corresponding to allele 7 in lane 1, alleles 9 + 9.3 in lane 2, alleles
`6 + 9.3 in lane 3, alleles 7 -I- 8 in lane 4, and allele 9 in lane 5.
`Figure 7 presents electropherograms derived from the image in
`
`(25) Schwartz. H. E.: Ulfelder, K.; Sunzeri, F. J.; Busch, M. P.; Brownlee, R G.
`/. Chromatogr. 1991, 559, 267-283.
`(26) Guttman, A.: Cooke, N. Anal. Otem. 1991, 63, 2038-2042.
`
`1202 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 67, No. 7, April 1, 1995
`
`Time (minutes)
`Figure 7. Electropherograms of the THOl fragment sizing separa-
`is from the unknown
`tions presented in Figure 6. The green signal
`alleles, and the red signal is from the standard TH01 ladder. Traces
`A-E correspond to lanes 1 -5 in Figure 6.
`
`Figure 6. Very clear discrimination is observed between the
`green-labeled fragments and the red-labeled fragments with almost
`In some cases,
`no cross-talk between the green and red channels.
`the amplification products of heterozygote samples contain het-
`eroduplex bands that migrate behind the allelic ladder. Additional
`weak “noise” bands may represent nontemplated base addition7
`known to occur with PCR amplification of THOl (M. Savill and
`G. Sensabaugh, unpublished data).
`The accuracy and precision of allelic sizing using CAE was
`tested by performing multiple runs on 11 different samples. These
`results are summarized in Table 1. Since a linear relationship
`exists between molecular weight and migration time in the region
`of interest, the allelic ladder was used with a linear regression
`analysis to size the unknown fragments. The calculated sizes of
`unknown alleles are compared to true sizes based on sequence
`analysis and verified by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electro-
`phoresis. The average absolute difference of the determined allele
`70% of the
`sizes from the true allele sizes was 0.41, and over
`determined values were within 0.5 bp of the true value. The
`reproducibility is excellent (relative standard deviation less than
`no ambiguity in allele
`0.4% for each allele) and there was
`assignments. Two alleles, 9.3 and 10, which differ by a single
`base pair deletion cannot be electrophoretically resolved when
`paired but can be correctly assigned when in combination with
`It should, however, be possible to separate these
`any other allele.
`two fragments on columns containing higher concentrations of
`HEC 0. Bashkin and R. Johnston, personal communication).
`
`Agilent Exhibit 1272
`Page 6 of 7
`
`

`

`Table 1. Statistical Analysis of THOI Fragment Sizing*
`no. of detns
`allele
`mean size*
`length (bp)
`SDC (%)
`183
`187
`191
`195
`198
`199
`
`183.1
`187.0
`191.2
`195.4
`198.3
`199.0
`
`0.61 (0.33)
`0.41 (0.22)
`0.69 (0.36)
`0.60 (0.31)
`0.52 (0.26)
`0.31 (0.15)
`
`6
`7
`8
`9
`9.3
`10
`
`6
`23
`15
`11
`8
`6
`
`“ Eleven different amplified samples (7, 8), (6, 9.3), (9, 9.3), (6, 9)
`(7, 8), (8, 9), (7, 9.3), (7, 10), (6, 9.3), (7). and (9) were run 8, 2, 4, 3,
`5, 2, 1, 6, 1, 3, and 2 times, respectively.b Mean PCR product size as
`determined by linear regression using the allelic ladder as the sizing
`in terms of base pairs for the
`standard.c Standard deviation (SD)
`indicated number of determinations. The percent relative SD is given
`in parentheses.
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`The purpose of this work was to develop methods for high-
`speed, high-throughput sizing of short tandem repeats using
`capillary array electrophoresis. This can be broken down into
`the steps of (1) developing methods for achieving single-base (or
`near single base) resolution of ds-DNA fragments using replace-
`able separation matrices and (2) developing methods for multiplex
`labeling to achieve on-column sizing of unknown STRs in the
`presence of an allelic standard. We demonstrate here that these
`objectives can be achieved using ET primers in combination with
`CAE on HEC capillary supports containing 9-AA The advantages
`
`(27) Bashkin, J. S.; Roach, D.; Rosengaus, E.; Barker, D. L. Human Genome
`Program, Contractor-Grantee Workshop III, U.S. Department of Energy
`1993; p 116.
`
`of the method presented here are that ET primers provide higher
`sensitivity and better color discrimination than that possible with
`conventional single dye-labeled fluorescent PCR primers. Second,
`the HEC solutions used as the sieving media provide high speed
`(<20 min) separations on columns that can be easily refilled and
`rerun. Finally, the CAE format provides the ability to run 50 or
`more separations in parallel.27 The amplification of multiple STR
`targets with different fragment lengths in the 100-500-bp size
`range plus the use of up to four different ET primers16 should
`provide an additional increase in the throughput of STR typing.
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`We thank the members of the Berkeley High-Sensitivity DNA
`Analysis Group for their support, Alexander N. Glazer and Steven
`M. Clark for valuable discussions, and Alan Taur for expert
`preparation of the figures. This research was supported by a grant
`from the Director, Office of Energy Research, Office of Health
`and Environmental Research of the U.S. Department of Energy
`under Contract DE-FG-91ER61125 to RAM. and by a grant from
`the National Institute of Justice (93-U-EX-0010) to G.F.S. JJ. was
`supported by a Human Genome Distinguished Postdoctoral
`Fellowship sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office
`of Health and Environment Research, and administrated by the
`Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Educatio

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket