throbber
Filed: September 4, 2019
`
`Doug G. Muehlhauser (Reg. No. 42,018)
`William H. Shreve (Reg. No. 35,678)
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor
`Irvine, CA 92614
`Tel.:
`(949) 760-0404
`Fax:
`(949) 760-9502
`E-mail: BoxNomadix@knobbe.com
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`GUEST TEK INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NOMADIX, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2019-00253
`Patent 8,626,922
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MOTION FOR PAYSON LEMEILLEUR TO APPEAR
`PRO HAC VICE ON BEHALF OF PATENT OWNER NOMADIX
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`I. STATEMENT OF THE PRECISE RELIEF REQUESTED
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.10(c) and 42.22, Patent Owner Nomadix, Inc.
`
`(“Nomadix”) hereby moves for an Order allowing Payson LeMeilleur of Knobbe
`
`Martens Olson & Bear LLP to appear pro hac vice as additional backup counsel on
`
`behalf of Nomadix in the above-captioned case. On August 15, 2019, the Board
`
`indicated that no authorization was required for this motion.
`
`Patent Owner has conferred with Petitioner concerning the subject matter of
`
`this motion. Petitioner has stated that it does not oppose this motion.
`
`II. LIST OF EXHIBITS RELIED UPON FOR THIS MOTION
`Nomadix Ex. 2002 - Declaration of Payson LeMeilleur in Support of Motion
`
`to Appear Pro Hac Vice on Behalf of Nomadix, Inc.
`
`A. Reasons the requested relief should be granted
`As set forth below in the Statement of Material Facts, Nomadix has made all
`
`of the showings required under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) for recognizing Mr. LeMeilleur
`
`pro hac vice. In particular, Mr. LeMeilleur is an experienced litigating attorney.
`
`Further, Mr. LeMeilleur has an established familiarity with the subject matter at
`
`issue in this proceeding. Accordingly, allowing Mr. LeMeilleur to appear pro hac
`
`vice as additional backup counsel on behalf of Nomadix is appropriate in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`

`III. STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) provides that “[t]he Board may recognize counsel
`
`1.
`
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to the
`
`condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner and to any other conditions
`
`as the Board may impose. For example, where the lead counsel is a registered
`
`practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel who is not a registered
`
`practitioner may be granted upon showing that counsel is an experienced litigating
`
`attorney and has an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the
`
`proceeding.”
`
`2.
`
`Lead counsel in this Inter Partes Review proceeding is Douglas G.
`
`Muehlhauser. Mr. Muehlhauser is registered to practice before the United States
`
`Patent and Trademark Office and holds Registration No. 42,018.
`
`3.
`
`As set forth in the attached Nomadix Exhibit 2002 (the “LeMeilleur
`
`Declaration”), Mr. LeMeilleur is an experienced litigating attorney and has an
`
`established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding.
`
`LeMeilleur Decl. ¶ 5. Mr. LeMeilleur has previously been admitted before the Board
`
`pro hac vice in Sony Corporation v. One-E-Way, Inc., Case Nos. IPR2016-01638
`
`(Patent 9,282,396 B2) and IPR2016-01639 (Patent 9,282,396 B2). Id. at ¶ 12.
`
`4.
`
`In particular, Mr. LeMeilleur has 20 years of experience as a patent
`
`litigator and has represented clients in numerous patent litigation cases in various
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`United States District Courts and in the United States Court of Appeals for the
`
`Federal Circuit. Id. ¶ 2.
`
`5.
`
`Further, Mr. LeMeilleur holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Physics
`
`from the University of Southern California. Id. ¶ 4.
`
`6. Mr. LeMeilleur has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in Part 42 of 37
`
`C.F.R. Id. ¶ 10. Mr. LeMeilleur also agrees to be subject to the United States Patent
`
`and Trademark Office Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§
`
`11.101 et seq., and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a). Id. ¶ 11.
`
`7.
`
`Finally, Mr. LeMeilleur has attested to the remaining elements of
`
`Paragraph 2(b) of the representative “Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission” in Case IPR2013-00639, Paper 7. Id. ¶¶ 1-11; see Notice of Filing Date
`
`Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response (Paper
`
`4) at 2.
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`In view of the foregoing, and having satisfied the requirements of 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.10(c), Nomadix hereby moves for an Order allowing Payson LeMeilleur of
`
`Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP to appear pro hac vice as additional backup
`
`counsel on behalf of Nomadix in the above-captioned case.
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`Respectfully submitted,
`
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`
`
`
`/Doug Muehlhauser/
`Douglas G. Muehlhauser (Reg. No. 42,018)
`William H. Shreve (Reg. No. 35,678)
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`NOMADIX, INC.
`
`Customer No. 20995
`(949) 760-0404
`
`Dated: September 4, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I hereby certify that, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e) and with the agreement
`
`of counsel for Petitioner, a true and correct copy of MOTION FOR PAYSON
`
`LEMEILLEUR TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE ON BEHALF OF PATENT
`
`OWNER NOMADIX is being served electronically on September 4, 2019, to the e-
`
`mail addresses shown below:
`
`Jeffrey W. Lesovitz
`Baker & Hostetler LLP
`jlesovitz@bakerlaw.com
`
`Steven J. Rocci
`Baker & Hostetler LLP
`srocci@bakerlaw.com
`
`Daniel J. Goettle
`Baker & Hostetler LLP
`dgoettle@bakerlaw.com
`
`Guest-TekIPR@bakerlaw.com
`
`
`
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`
`Dated: September 4, 2019
`
`
`31188726
`
`/Doug Muehlhauser/
`Douglas G. Muehlhauser (Reg. No. 42,018)
`William H. Shreve (Reg. No. 35,678)
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`NOMADIX, INC.
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket