throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`GUEST TEK INTERACTIVE
`ENTERTAINMENT LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NOMADIX, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2019-00253
`Patent 8,626,922
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`

`

`Case IPR2019-00253
`U.S. Patent No. 8,626,922
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) Guest Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd.
`
`(“Petitioner”) hereby requests oral argument, currently scheduled for February 25,
`
`2020. See Scheduling Oder, Paper 7 at p. 9.
`
`Petitioner specifies the following issues to be argued:
`
`1. Whether Challenged Claims 1 and 9 of the ’922 patent are
`
`unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over the ’540 patent (Ex. 1004) in
`
`view of the ’433 patent (Ex. 1006).
`
`2. Whether Challenged Claims 1 and 9 of the ’922 patent are
`
`unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over the ’279 patent (Ex. 1005) in
`
`view of the 98-010P Report (Ex. 1007).
`
`3. Whether Challenged Claims 1 and 9 of the ’922 patent are
`
`unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over the ’492 patent (Ex. 1008) in
`
`view of the ’540 patent.
`
`Any issues addressed by the Board in the Decision to Institute (Paper
`
`Reply to any arguments raised in Patent Owner’s Response or Sur-
`
`6).
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`Reply.
`
`6.
`
`Respond to any issues specified by Patent Owner in its request for oral
`
`argument.
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`

`Case IPR2019-00253
`U.S. Patent No. 8,626,922
`
`7.
`
`Respond to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters.
`
`Petitioner notes that the current IPR is very closely related to IPR2019-
`
`00211 and that most of the issues to be argued are identical. Consequently,
`
`Petitioner suggests that the oral argument for each of these IPRs be combined into
`
`a single oral argument for efficiency.
`
`Dated: January 7, 2020
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Jeffrey W. Lesovitz/
`Jeffrey W. Lesovitz (Reg. No. 63,461)
`Steven J. Rocci (Reg. No. 30,489)
`Daniel J. Goettle (Reg. No. 50,983)
`BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
`Cira Centre, 12th Floor
`2929 Arch Street
`Philadelphia, PA 19104-2891
`T (215) 568-3100
`F (215) 568-73439
`jlesovitz@bakerlaw.com
`srocci@bakerlaw.com
`dgoettle@bakerlaw.com
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`Guest Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd.
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`Case IPR2019-00253
`U.S. Patent No. 8,626,922
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served via email
`
`this 7th day of January, 2020, on the following:
`
`Douglas G. Muehlhauser
`William H. Shreve
`Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
`2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor
`Irvine, CA 92614
`2dgm@knobbe.com
`2whs@knobbe.com
`BoxNomadix@knobbe.com
`
`/Jeffrey W. Lesovitz/
`Jeffrey W. Lesovitz (Reg. No. 63,461)
`BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
`Cira Centre, 12th Floor
`2929 Arch Street
`Philadelphia, PA 19104-2891
`T (215) 568-3100
`F (215) 568-73439
`jlesovitz@bakerlaw.com
`
`- 1 -
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket