`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`——————————
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`——————————
`
`Axis Communications AB, Canon Inc., and Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Avigilon Fortress Corporation,
`
`Patent Owner
`——————————
`Case: IPR2019-00235
`U.S. Patent No. 7,868,912
`——————————
`PETITIONERS’ UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`(as of April 1, 2019)
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e), Petitioners hereby submit a current listing
`
`Case No. IPR2019-00235
`U.S. Patent No. 7,868,912
`
`of Exhibits.
`
`EXHIBIT
`NO.
`1001
`
`1002
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`1006
`1007
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`DESCRIPTION
`U.S. Patent No. 7,868,912 B2 and Reexamination Certificate
`7,868,912 C1 (“the ’912 patent”)
`Prosecution History of the ’912 patent (excluding references
`cited by Examiner or the applicant)
`“Visual Memory” by Christopher James Kellogg (“Kellogg”)
`“Event Recognition and Reliability Improvements for the
`Autonomous Video Surveillance System” by Frank Brill et al.
`(“Brill”)
`“Autonomous Scene Monitoring System” by Bruce Flinchbaugh
`et al. (“Flinchbaugh”)
`Declaration of John R. Grindon, D.Sc.
`Declaration of Emily R. Florio
`February 29, 2012 Request for inter partes Reexamination of the
`’912 Patent, excluding Exhibits and Appendices
`April 10, 2012 Order Granting/Denying Request for inter partes
`Reexamination of the ’912 Patent
`April 10, 2012 Office Action in inter partes Reexamination of
`the ’912 Patent
`June 11, 2012 Amendment and Reply in inter partes
`Reexamination of the ’912 Patent
`February 13, 2013 Decision Granting Petition to Terminate inter
`partes Reexamination Proceeding of the ’912 Patent
`May 24, 2013 Attachment to Request for ex parte
`Reexamination of the ’912 Patent, excluding Exhibits and
`Appendices
`June 20, 2013 Order Granting/Denying Request for ex parte
`Reexamination of the ’912 Patent
`August 30, 2013 Office Action in ex parte Reexamination of the
`’912 Patent
`October 30, 2013 Amendment and Reply in ex parte
`Reexamination of the ’912 Patent
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2019-00235
`U.S. Patent No. 7,868,912
`
`EXHIBIT
`NO.
`1017
`
`1018
`
`1019
`1020
`1021
`1022
`
`1023
`
`1024
`
`1025
`
`1026
`
`1027
`
`1028
`
`1029
`
`1030
`
`1031
`
`1032
`
`1033
`
`1034
`1035
`
`DESCRIPTION
`March 27, 2014 Final Office Action in ex parte Reexamination
`of the ’912 Patent
`April 16, 2014 Amendment and Reply in ex parte
`Reexamination of the ’912 Patent
`April 29, 2014 Notice of Intent to Issue ex parte Reexamination
`Certificate of the ’912 Patent
`Reserved
`U.S. Patent No. 5,969,755 to Courtney (“Courtney”)
`“Object-Oriented Conceptual Modeling of Video Data” by
`Young Francis Day et al., (“Day”)
`Declaration of Christopher James Bailey-Kellogg, submitted as
`Exhibit 1011 in IPR2018-00138 and as Exhibit 1011 in
`IPR2018-00140
`Applicant Response of August 27, 2012 in inter partes
`Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,932,923 (“the ’923 patent”)
`Decision Granting Petition to Terminate inter partes
`Reexamination of the ’923 patent
`May 23, 2013 Attachment to Request for ex parte
`Reexamination of the ’923 patent
`June 17, 2013 Order Granting/Denying Request for ex parte
`Reexamination of the ’923 patent
`August 30, 2013 Office Action in ex parte Reexamination of the
`’923 patent
`Applicant Response of October 30, 2013 in ex parte
`Reexamination of the ’923 patent
`April 4, 2014 Final Office Action in ex parte Reexamination of
`the ’923 patent
`April 16, 2014 Amendment and Reply in ex parte
`Reexamination of the ’923 patent
`Notice of Intent to Issue ex parte Reexamination Certificate of
`the ’923 patent
`Declaration of Kenneth A. Zeger for the ex parte Reexamination
`of the ’923 patent
`U.S. Patent No. 7,932,923 B2 and Reexamination Certificate
`7,932,923 C1 (“the ’923 patent”)
`U.S. Patent No. 8,564,661
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2019-00235
`U.S. Patent No. 7,868,912
`
`EXHIBIT
`NO.
`1036
`1037
`1038
`1039
`1040
`1041
`1042
`1043
`1044
`1045
`
`
`DESCRIPTION
`Curriculum Vitae of John R. Grindon, D.Sc.
`Reserved
`U.S. Application No. 09/987,707, filed November 15, 2001 (“the
`’707 application”)
`Reserved
`Reserved
`U.S. Patent No. 7,447,331 to Brown (“Brown”)
`“A Novel Method for Tracking and Counting Pedestrians in
`Real-Time Using a Single Camera” by Osama Masoud et al.
`Corrected Declaration of Emily R. Florio
`Comparison (redlined) between original and corrected
`Declaration of Emily R. Florio
`Declaration of Guang-Yu Zhu
`
`Dated: April 1, 2019
`
`By: /C. Gregory Gramenopoulos/
` C. Gregory Gramenopoulos
` Reg. No. 36,532
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER LLP
`
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`Tel. 202.408.4263 Fax 202.408.4400
`
`gramenoc@finnegan.com
`
`Attorney for Petitioner
`Axis Communications AB
`
` By: /Joseph A. Calvaruso/
`
` Joseph A. Calvaruso
`
` Reg. No. 28,287
`
`
`
` ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
`
` LLP
`
`51 West 52nd Street
`
` New York, NY 10019-6142
` Tel. 212.506.5140; Fax 212.506.5151
`
`
`
`jcalvaruso@orrick.com
`
` Attorney for Petitioners
` Canon Inc. and Canon U.S.A., Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2019-00235
`U.S. Patent No. 7,868,912
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing PETITIONERS’
`
`UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST and EXHIBITS 1043-1045 were served on April 1,
`
`2019, via email directed to counsel of record for Patent Owner at the following:
`
`Eugene Goryunov
`Kirkland & Ellis LLP
`300 North LaSalle
`Chicago, IL 60654
`eugene.goryunov@kirkland.com
`Avigilon_Axis@kirkland.com
`
`Reza Dokhanchy
`Adam R. Alper
`Akshay S. Deoras
`Kirkland & Ellis LLP
`555 California Street
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`reza.dokhanchy@kirkland.com
`adam.alper@kirkland.com
`akshay.deoras@kirkland.com
`
`Michael W. De Vries
`Kirkland & Ellis LLP
`333 Hope Street
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`michael.devries@kirkland.com
`
`
`Date: April 1, 2019
`
`
`
`By: /William Esper/
`William Esper
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`