`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`——————————
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`——————————
`
`Axis Communications AB, Canon Inc., and Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Avigilon Fortress Corporation,
`
`Patent Owner
`——————————
`Case: IPR2019-00235
`U.S. Patent No. 7,868,912
`——————————
`PETITIONERS’ UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`(as of April 1, 2019)
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e), Petitioners hereby submit a current listing
`
`Case No. IPR2019-00235
`U.S. Patent No. 7,868,912
`
`of Exhibits.
`
`EXHIBIT
`NO.
`1001
`
`1002
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`1006
`1007
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`DESCRIPTION
`U.S. Patent No. 7,868,912 B2 and Reexamination Certificate
`7,868,912 C1 (“the ’912 patent”)
`Prosecution History of the ’912 patent (excluding references
`cited by Examiner or the applicant)
`“Visual Memory” by Christopher James Kellogg (“Kellogg”)
`“Event Recognition and Reliability Improvements for the
`Autonomous Video Surveillance System” by Frank Brill et al.
`(“Brill”)
`“Autonomous Scene Monitoring System” by Bruce Flinchbaugh
`et al. (“Flinchbaugh”)
`Declaration of John R. Grindon, D.Sc.
`Declaration of Emily R. Florio
`February 29, 2012 Request for inter partes Reexamination of the
`’912 Patent, excluding Exhibits and Appendices
`April 10, 2012 Order Granting/Denying Request for inter partes
`Reexamination of the ’912 Patent
`April 10, 2012 Office Action in inter partes Reexamination of
`the ’912 Patent
`June 11, 2012 Amendment and Reply in inter partes
`Reexamination of the ’912 Patent
`February 13, 2013 Decision Granting Petition to Terminate inter
`partes Reexamination Proceeding of the ’912 Patent
`May 24, 2013 Attachment to Request for ex parte
`Reexamination of the ’912 Patent, excluding Exhibits and
`Appendices
`June 20, 2013 Order Granting/Denying Request for ex parte
`Reexamination of the ’912 Patent
`August 30, 2013 Office Action in ex parte Reexamination of the
`’912 Patent
`October 30, 2013 Amendment and Reply in ex parte
`Reexamination of the ’912 Patent
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2019-00235
`U.S. Patent No. 7,868,912
`
`EXHIBIT
`NO.
`1017
`
`1018
`
`1019
`1020
`1021
`1022
`
`1023
`
`1024
`
`1025
`
`1026
`
`1027
`
`1028
`
`1029
`
`1030
`
`1031
`
`1032
`
`1033
`
`1034
`1035
`
`DESCRIPTION
`March 27, 2014 Final Office Action in ex parte Reexamination
`of the ’912 Patent
`April 16, 2014 Amendment and Reply in ex parte
`Reexamination of the ’912 Patent
`April 29, 2014 Notice of Intent to Issue ex parte Reexamination
`Certificate of the ’912 Patent
`Reserved
`U.S. Patent No. 5,969,755 to Courtney (“Courtney”)
`“Object-Oriented Conceptual Modeling of Video Data” by
`Young Francis Day et al., (“Day”)
`Declaration of Christopher James Bailey-Kellogg, submitted as
`Exhibit 1011 in IPR2018-00138 and as Exhibit 1011 in
`IPR2018-00140
`Applicant Response of August 27, 2012 in inter partes
`Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,932,923 (“the ’923 patent”)
`Decision Granting Petition to Terminate inter partes
`Reexamination of the ’923 patent
`May 23, 2013 Attachment to Request for ex parte
`Reexamination of the ’923 patent
`June 17, 2013 Order Granting/Denying Request for ex parte
`Reexamination of the ’923 patent
`August 30, 2013 Office Action in ex parte Reexamination of the
`’923 patent
`Applicant Response of October 30, 2013 in ex parte
`Reexamination of the ’923 patent
`April 4, 2014 Final Office Action in ex parte Reexamination of
`the ’923 patent
`April 16, 2014 Amendment and Reply in ex parte
`Reexamination of the ’923 patent
`Notice of Intent to Issue ex parte Reexamination Certificate of
`the ’923 patent
`Declaration of Kenneth A. Zeger for the ex parte Reexamination
`of the ’923 patent
`U.S. Patent No. 7,932,923 B2 and Reexamination Certificate
`7,932,923 C1 (“the ’923 patent”)
`U.S. Patent No. 8,564,661
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2019-00235
`U.S. Patent No. 7,868,912
`
`EXHIBIT
`NO.
`1036
`1037
`1038
`1039
`1040
`1041
`1042
`1043
`1044
`1045
`
`
`DESCRIPTION
`Curriculum Vitae of John R. Grindon, D.Sc.
`Reserved
`U.S. Application No. 09/987,707, filed November 15, 2001 (“the
`’707 application”)
`Reserved
`Reserved
`U.S. Patent No. 7,447,331 to Brown (“Brown”)
`“A Novel Method for Tracking and Counting Pedestrians in
`Real-Time Using a Single Camera” by Osama Masoud et al.
`Corrected Declaration of Emily R. Florio
`Comparison (redlined) between original and corrected
`Declaration of Emily R. Florio
`Declaration of Guang-Yu Zhu
`
`Dated: April 1, 2019
`
`By: /C. Gregory Gramenopoulos/
` C. Gregory Gramenopoulos
` Reg. No. 36,532
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER LLP
`
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`Tel. 202.408.4263 Fax 202.408.4400
`
`gramenoc@finnegan.com
`
`Attorney for Petitioner
`Axis Communications AB
`
` By: /Joseph A. Calvaruso/
`
` Joseph A. Calvaruso
`
` Reg. No. 28,287
`
`
`
` ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
`
` LLP
`
`51 West 52nd Street
`
` New York, NY 10019-6142
` Tel. 212.506.5140; Fax 212.506.5151
`
`
`
`jcalvaruso@orrick.com
`
` Attorney for Petitioners
` Canon Inc. and Canon U.S.A., Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2019-00235
`U.S. Patent No. 7,868,912
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing PETITIONERS’
`
`UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST and EXHIBITS 1043-1045 were served on April 1,
`
`2019, via email directed to counsel of record for Patent Owner at the following:
`
`Eugene Goryunov
`Kirkland & Ellis LLP
`300 North LaSalle
`Chicago, IL 60654
`eugene.goryunov@kirkland.com
`Avigilon_Axis@kirkland.com
`
`Reza Dokhanchy
`Adam R. Alper
`Akshay S. Deoras
`Kirkland & Ellis LLP
`555 California Street
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`reza.dokhanchy@kirkland.com
`adam.alper@kirkland.com
`akshay.deoras@kirkland.com
`
`Michael W. De Vries
`Kirkland & Ellis LLP
`333 Hope Street
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`michael.devries@kirkland.com
`
`
`Date: April 1, 2019
`
`
`
`By: /William Esper/
`William Esper
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
