`Transcript of Ravin Balakrishnan, Ph.D.
`Conducted on July 16, 2018
`
`1 (1 to 4)
`
`1
`
`3
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S
`
`ON BEHALF OF COMPLAINANTS ROVI CORPORATION,
`
`ROVI GUIDES, INC., ROVI TECHNOLOGIES CORP.,
`
`AND VEVEO, INC.:
`
` CHRIS BOVENKAMP, ESQUIRE
`
` McKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`
` 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500
`
` Dallas, Texas 75201
`
` United States of America
`
`0
`
` Phone: +1 214 978 4000
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
` UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
` WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`-----------------------x
`
`In the Matter of :
`
`CERTAIN DIGITAL VIDEO : Investigation No.: 337-TA-1103
`
`RECEIVERS AND RELATED :
`
`HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE :
`
`COMPONENTS :
`
`-----------------------x
`
`0
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`11
`
` HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`11
`
` (Present via videoconference)
`
`12
`
` Videotaped Deposition of RAVIN BALAKRISHNAN, Ph.D.
`
`13
`
` Singapore, Republic of Singapore
`
`12
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
` Monday, July 16, 2018
`
`14
`
`ON BEHALF OF THE COMCAST RESPONDENTS:
`
`15
`
` 8:04 p.m. SGT
`
`15
`
` JULIE HOLLOWAY, ESQUIRE
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`20
`
`Job No.: 198367
`
`21
`
`Pages: 1 - 76
`
`16
`
` BLAKE DAVIS, ESQUIRE
`
`17
`
` LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`
`18
`
` 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
`
`19
`
` San Francisco, California 94111-6538
`
`20
`
` United States of America
`
`21
`
` Phone: +1 415 391 0600
`
`22
`
`Reported by: Susan D. Wasilewski, RPR, CRR, CRC, CMRS, FPR
`
`22
`
` (Present via videoconference)
`
`2
`
`4
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S
`
`ON BEHALF OF THE COMCAST RESPONDENTS:
`
` ELIZABETH PURCELL, ESQUIRE
`
` LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`
` 9 Raffles Place
`
` #42-02 Republic Plaza
`
` Singapore, 048619
`
` Republic of Singapore
`
` Phone: +65 6536 1161
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`
`11
`
`12
`
`ALSO PRESENT:
`
`13
`
` YURIKO HWANG, Videographer
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Videotaped deposition of RAVIN
`
`BALAKRISHNAN, Ph.D., held at:
`
`
`
`
`
` SINGAPORE MARRIOTT TANG PLAZA
`
` 320 Orchard Road
`
` Singapore, 238865
`
` Republic of Singapore
`
` Phone: +65 6831 4778
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
` Before:
`
`15
`
` SUSAN D. WASILEWSKI
`
`16
`
` Registered Professional Reporter
`
`17
`
` Certified Realtime Reporter
`
`18
`
` Certified Manager of Reporting Services
`
`19
`
` Certified Realtime Captioner
`
`20
`
` Florida Professional Reporter
`
`21
`
` Certified Court Reporter - New Jersey
`
`22
`
` ~ Realtime Systems Administrator ~
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`Comcast, Exhibit-1016
`
`
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Ravin Balakrishnan, Ph.D.
`Conducted on July 16, 2018
`69
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
` the back-and-forth communications, it is very
` clear that they were being provided on the
` declaration and the opinions. You're going to
` get a second shot to ask him about
` noninfringement-related questions very
` shortly.
` MS. HOLLOWAY: This is not
` noninfringement. This is about the scope of
` control circuitry. This is about the scope of
` control circuitry, and you are refusing to let
` the witness answer.
` MR. BOVENKAMP: I disagree.
` MS. HOLLOWAY: You can disagree all you
` want.
`BY MS. HOLLOWAY:
` Q All right, Doctor. Now, it's your
`opinion, as you said before, that a person of
`ordinary skill in the art would understand control
`circuitry to refer to a processor; is that right?
` A I would say, as I said in Paragraph 26, I
`said control circuitry would be commonly referred
`to as a processor.
`
`18 (69 to 72)
`
`71
`
`it doesn't have to be. It could be a simpler --
`just a circuit.
` Q How would a person of ordinary skill in
`the art know whether control circuitry for
`performing a particular function is a processor?
` A Typically, that processor is able to do
`more than one thing. If it's a bit more general
`than a single purpose circuit, then it would
`generally be called a processor. Now, processors
`are also circuits, so I think it's a question of
`terminology.
` Q Okay. That doesn't really answer my
`question, Doctor. Okay?
` A person of ordinary skill in the art
`looking at a claim term that says control
`circuitry for performing a particular function,
`how would that person of ordinary skill in the art
`know whether that control circuitry for performing
`a particular function is a processor, a general
`purpose processor?
` A Well, they would know it's a general
`purpose processor if it's able -- if that
`
`72
`
`70
`
`processor is able to do more than one thing.
` Q Okay. Now, would that processor have to
` Q So if control circuitry is described as
`be programmed in order to perform the functions
`performing more than one function, you're saying
`here?
` A It would depend on the particular control
`that tells you that -- a person of ordinary skill
`circuitry. It may require programming; it may
`in the art, that that control circuitry is a
`not. It may come preloaded with a program, or it
`processor?
` A I think it would tell one of -- one of
`may just do --
`skill in the art that, you know, it's more than
` Q Is control circuitry always a processor?
`likely, it's a more general purpose processor.
` MR. BOVENKAMP: Objection to form.
` Q But you'll agree, Doctor, that control
` Q Go ahead.
`0
` A Sorry. I was just finishing up my answer
`circuitry is not necessarily, in general, a
`11
`there.
`general purpose processor, right?
`12
` Or it may -- it may be a static processor
` MR. BOVENKAMP: Objection as to form.
`13
` A I would say it doesn't have to be a
`that does not -- is not programmable. That's also
`14
`general purpose processor.
`possible.
`15
` Q Okay. Doctor, my colleague and I are
` Q Is control circuitry always a processor?
`16
` A It's not necessarily a general processor.
`going to take a short break and discuss this. We
`17
`It could be a very simple piece of electronic
`may be pretty close to over, which I'm sure is
`18
`circuitry that is not a more general processor.
`good news to you, since it's getting late in
`19
`Singapore.
` Q So control circuitry may or may not be a
`20
` A Okay. Thank you.
`processor, a general purpose processor?
`21
` A It can be a general purpose processor, but
` MS. HOLLOWAY: Recess for 10 minutes.
`22
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1234567891
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
`Transcript of Ravin Balakrishnan, Ph.D.
`Conducted on July 16, 2018
`73
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are going off
` record. The time is 21:40.
` (Recess from 9:40 p.m. until 9:46 p.m.)
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are back on the
` record. The time is 21:46.
` MS. HOLLOWAY: Okay. Doctor, if your
` counsel has no redirect, I am done with the
` questions for today.
` We reserve the right to seek additional
` time, given Counsel's instruction not to
` answer.
` CROSS-EXAMINATION
`BY MR. BOVENKAMP:
` Q I have just one question for you,
`Dr. Balakrishnan.
` A Okay.
` Q You were asked some questions about the
`spinning of the hard disk drive. Do you remember
`those?
` A Yes, I do.
` Q Can you give us an idea of how fast those
`platter -- the platter or platters spin,
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`75
`videotaped deposition of RAVIN BALAKRISHNAN,
`Ph.D., was concluded at 9:47 p.m.)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`19 (73 to 76)
`
`76
`
`74
`
`approximately?
` MS. HOLLOWAY: I object to this as outside
` the scope. I didn't ask him about the speed.
` A They spin extremely fast. It's something
`that your naked eye would not be able to see. I'd
`have to look up the rough speeds, but it's
`spinning extremely fast and definitely in the --
`in the submillisecond range per revolution.
` MS. HOLLOWAY: It's a what second range,
` Doctor?
` THE WITNESS: In the submillisecond range
` per revolution.
` MS. HOLLOWAY: Thank you.
` MR. BOVENKAMP: No further questions.
` MS. HOLLOWAY: No further questions here.
` Thank you for your time, Doctor. Enjoy
` your vacation.
` THE WITNESS: Thank you very much.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This marks the end of
` today's deposition of Dr. Ravin Balakrishnan.
` We are going off record. The time is 21:47.
` (Signature having not been requested, the
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
` CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER
` I, Susan D. Wasilewski, Registered
`Professional Reporter, Certified Realtime
`Reporter, Certified Realtime Captioner, Certified
`Manager of Reporting Services, Florida
`Professional Reporter, and Certified Court
`Reporter (New Jersey), do hereby certify that I
`was authorized to and did report the examination
`of the witness named herein; that a review of the
`transcript was not requested; and that the
`foregoing transcript is a true and correct record
`of my stenographic notes.
` I FURTHER CERTIFY that I am not a
`relative, employee, attorney, or counsel for any
`of the parties, nor am I a relative or employee of
`any of the parties' attorneys or counsel connected
`with the action, nor am I financially interested
`in the outcome of this action.
` DATED THIS 17th of July, 2018.
`
`_____________________________________________________
`Susan D. Wasilewski, RPR, CRR, CRC, CMRS, FPR, CCR-NJ
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site