`Trials
`Doug.Muehlhauser; William.Shreve; Payson.LeMeilleur; Kendall.Loebbaka; BoxNomadix; Goettle, Daniel; Rocci,
`Steven; Lesovitz, Jeffrey; Guest-TekIPR
`IPR2019-00211, IPR2019-00253 - Request for conference call regarding case schedule
`Friday, January 24, 2020 3:41:16 PM
`2020-01-23 [113] Order Granting Nomadix"s Motion for Summary Judgment.pdf
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`Attachments:
`
`Dear Board,
`
` I
`
` write on behalf of Patent Owner in IPR2019-00211 and IPR2019-00253 to request a conference call
`the week of January 27 at the Board’s earliest convenience. Patent Owner seeks authorization to file
`a motion to extend the case schedule. The motion would be based at least on the attached order, in
`which the United States District Court for the Central District of California granted summary
`judgment in Patent Owner’s favor, concluding that the present IPR proceedings violate the forum-
`selection clause in the parties’ license agreement.
`
`In view of upcoming deadlines in February, including oral argument before the Board, Patent Owner
`respectfully requests a conference call as soon as possible.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Mark Lezama
`Partner
`mark.lezama@knobbe.com
`949-721-5362 Direct
`Knobbe Martens
`2040 Main St., 14th Fl.
`Irvine, CA 92614
`www.knobbe.com/mark-lezama
`
`
`
`NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
`privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not
`the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original
`message.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
