`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GUEST TEK INTERACTIVE
`ENTERTAINMENT LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NOMADIX, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2019-00211
`Patent 7,953,857
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2019-00211
`U.S. Patent No. 7,953,857
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) Guest Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd.
`
`(“Petitioner”) hereby requests oral argument, currently scheduled for February 25,
`
`2020. See Scheduling Oder, Paper 7 at p. 9.
`
`Petitioner specifies the following issues to be argued:
`
`1. Whether Challenged Claims 1 and 9 of the ’857 patent are
`
`unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over the ’540 patent (Ex. 1004) in
`
`view of the ’433 patent (Ex. 1006).
`
`2. Whether Challenged Claims 1 and 9 of the ’857 patent are
`
`unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over the ’279 patent (Ex. 1005) in
`
`view of the 98-010P Report (Ex. 1007).
`
`3. Whether Challenged Claims 1 and 9 of the ’857 patent are
`
`unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over the ’492 patent (Ex. 1008) in
`
`view of the ’540 patent.
`
`4. Any issues addressed by the Board in the Decision to Institute (Paper
`
`6).
`
`Reply.
`
`5. Reply to any arguments raised in Patent Owner’s Response or Sur-
`
`6. Respond to any issues specified by Patent Owner in its request for oral
`
`argument.
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`
`
`7. Respond to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters.
`
`Case IPR2019-00211
`U.S. Patent No. 7,953,857
`
`Petitioner notes that the current IPR is very closely related to IPR2019-
`
`00253 and that most of the issues to be argued are identical. Consequently,
`
`Petitioner suggests that the oral argument for each of these IPRs be combined into
`
`a single oral argument for efficiency.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: January 6, 2020
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Jeffrey W. Lesovitz/
`Jeffrey W. Lesovitz (Reg. No. 63,461)
`Steven J. Rocci (Reg. No. 30,489)
`Daniel J. Goettle (Reg. No. 50,983)
`BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
`Cira Centre, 12th Floor
`2929 Arch Street
`Philadelphia, PA 19104-2891
`T (215) 568-3100
`F (215) 568-73439
`jlesovitz@bakerlaw.com
`srocci@bakerlaw.com
`dgoettle@bakerlaw.com
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`Guest Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd.
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`Case IPR2019-00211
`U.S. Patent No. 7,953,857
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served via email
`
`this 7th day of January, 2020, on the following:
`
`Douglas G. Muehlhauser
`William H. Shreve
`Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
`2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor
`Irvine, CA 92614
`2dgm@knobbe.com
`2whs@knobbe.com
`BoxNomadix@knobbe.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Jeffrey W. Lesovitz/
`Jeffrey W. Lesovitz (Reg. No. 63,461)
`BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
`Cira Centre, 12th Floor
`2929 Arch Street
`Philadelphia, PA 19104-2891
`T (215) 568-3100
`F (215) 568-73439
`jlesovitz@bakerlaw.com
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`