`
`Doug G. Muehlhauser (Reg. No. 42,018)
`William H. Shreve (Reg. No. 35,678)
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor
`Irvine, CA 92614
`Tel.:
`(949) 760-0404
`Fax:
`(949) 760-9502
`E-mail: BoxNomadix@knobbe.com
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`GUEST TEK INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NOMADIX, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2019-00211
`Patent 7,953,857
`
`DECLARATION OF KENDALL M. LOEBBAKA IN SUPPORT OF
`MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE ON BEHALF OF PATENT
`OWNER NOMADIX
`
`NOMADIX 2003
`Guest Tek v. Nomadix
`IPR2019-00211
`
`
`
`I, Kendall M. Loebbaka, do hereby declare:
`
`1.
`
`I am a partner in the law firm of Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear,
`
`LLP. Lead counsel in this inter partes review proceeding is Douglas G.
`
`Muehlhauser, who is also a partner in the law firm of Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear,
`
`LLP. Mr. Muehlhauser is registered to practice before the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Office and holds Registration No. 42,018. With respect to this
`
`proceeding, I will work closely with Mr. Muehlhauser.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`I have over six years of experience as a patent litigator.
`
`I am counsel with whom Patent Owner is familiar. Patent Owner
`
`desires, and has a need, to be represented in these proceedings by counsel with whom
`
`it is familiar.
`
`4.
`
`I am comfortable and experienced with technically and legally complex
`
`matters, such as will be present in this proceeding. In particular, I am experienced
`
`with technically and legally complex matters in the field of bandwidth
`
`management. In addition to the above described experience with technically and
`
`legally complex patent matters, I hold a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical
`
`Engineering from California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo.
`
`5.
`
`I am familiar with U.S. Patent 7,953,857 (“the ’857 patent”), and with
`
`the legal subject matter, technical subject matter, and prior art discussed in
`
`- 1 -
`
`NOMADIX 2003
`Guest Tek v. Nomadix
`IPR2019-00211
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s request for inter partes review of the ’857 patent, which forms the basis
`
`for this proceeding.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of California.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court
`
`or administrative body.
`
`8.
`
`I have never had a court or administrative body deny my application for
`
`admission to practice.
`
`9.
`
`I have never been sanctioned or cited for contempt by any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`10.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide
`
`and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the C.F.R.
`
`11.
`
`I agree to be subject to the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Code of Professional Responsibility set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`12.
`
`In the past three (3) years, I have not appeared pro hac vice in any
`
`proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. I appeared pro
`
`hac vice in Kinetic Techs., Inc. v. Skyworks Solutions, Inc., Case No. IPR2014-00690
`
`(U.S. Patent No. 8,539,275), which was granted on May 22, 2015 (Paper 35).
`
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`NOMADIX 2003
`Guest Tek v. Nomadix
`IPR2019-00211
`
`
`
`13.1 declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledgeare true andthatall
`
`statements made on information andbelief are believed to be true; and further that
`
`these statements were made with the knowledgethat willful, false statements and
`
`the like so made are punishable byfine or imprisonment, or both, under Section 1001
`
`of Title 18 of the United States Code and that such willful false statements may
`
`jeopardize the validity of U.S. Patent No. 7,953,857.
`
`
`
`Dated: gles) ha
`
`31188178
`
`NOMADIX 2003
`Guest Tek v. Nomadix
`IPR2019-00211
`
`NOMADIX 2003
`Guest Tek v. Nomadix
`IPR2019-00211
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
