throbber
EVIDENCE-BASED REVIEW ARTICLE
`
`Am J Clln Dermatol 2012; 13 (3): 141-152
`l l76-056 l/l2/0003-0l4 l/$49.95/0
`
`© 2012 Adls Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
`
`American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
`June 2012, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 141–152
`
`Topical Antimicrobial Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
`An Evidence-Based Review
`
`Ryan Gamble,1 Jeff Dunn,1 Annelise Dawson,1 Brian Petersen,1 Lauren McLaughlin} Alison Small,3 Scott Kindle4
`and Robert P. Dellavalle1
`5
`•
`
`1 School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
`2 College of Osteopathic Medicine, Rocky Vista University, Parker, CO, USA
`3 College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
`4 College of Medicine, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE, USA
`5 Dermatology Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
`
`Contents
`
`Abstract. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 l
`l. Literature Search . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
`2. Mechanisms of Action of Anti-Acne Agents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
`3. Benzoyl Peroxide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
`4. Topical Antibiotics ............................................................................................... 143
`5. Benzoyl Peroxide and Antibiotic Combinations ....................................................................... 143
`6. Retinoid and Antibiotic Combinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
`7. OtherTopicalTreatmentOptions ................................................................................... 143
`8. Bacterial Resistance .............................................................................................. 145
`9. Treatment Selection .............................................................................................. 146
`9. l Expert Guidelines. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
`9.2 Comparing Combination Therapies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
`9.3 Adverse Effects ............................................................................................. 148
`9.4 Cost ....................................................................................................... 148
`9.5 Practical Considerations ...................................................................................... 149
`9.6 Conflicts of Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
`l 0. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
`
`Abstract
`
`Topical antimicrobial treatment is indicated for mild to moderate acne vulgaris. Our literature review
`includes searches of Ovid, MED LINE, EMBASE, and the databases of the Cochrane Library. A detailed
`search strategy is included. All searches were limited to controlled trials and systematic reviews. No year
`limits were applied to the searches, but we focused on trials, guidelines, and reviews published since 2004, the
`year that the last review of topical antimicrobials was published in this journal. Several controlled trials
`demonstrate that benzoyl peroxide, topical antibiotics, and topical retinoids used in combination provide
`the greatest efficacy and safety profile for the treatment of mild to moderate acne, but there are few trials
`directly comparing different combinations of these topical therapies with one another. Additionally, robust
`studies comparing cost and efficacy of generic combinations of the above agents with proprietary fixed-dose
`combination therapies that may increase compliance are also lacking. Although they have not been exten(cid:173)
`sively studied, alternative agents including dapsone, salicylic acid, azelaic acid, and zinc are safe and effi(cid:173)
`cacious when combined with traditional therapies.
`
`1 of 12
`
`Almirall EXHIBIT 2059
`
`Amneal v. Almirall
`IPR2019-00207
`
`

`

`142
`
`Gamble et al.
`
`Acne vulgaris is a highly prevalent skin disease and the most
`common skin disorder in adolescents. Numerous treatment
`options are available, but topical antimicrobial therapy re(cid:173)
`mains a mainstay for the management of mild to moderate acne
`because it offers localized treatment with less risk of systemic
`adverse effects_[ll We review recent trials evaluating topical
`antimicrobial therapy and assess current evidence relevant to
`the development of treatment suggestions and guidelines.121
`
`1. Literature Search
`
`The literature review conducted for this paper includes
`searches in the following databases: Ovid, MEDLINE,
`EMBASE, and the databases of the Cochrane Library, includ(cid:173)
`ing the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Central Reg(cid:173)
`ister of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Database of Abstracts of
`Reviews of Effects (DARE), Methodology Register, Technology
`Assessment Database, and Economic Evaluation Database.
`Concepts searched included acne vulgaris and topical anti(cid:173)
`biotics. Terms that describe the concepts include 'acne vulgaris,'
`'topical anti-microbial,'
`'anti-infective agents,'
`'anti-bacterial
`agents,' 'dermatologic agents,' 'benzoyl peroxide,' 'sodium sulfa(cid:173)
`cetamide,' 'azelaic acid,' 'clindamycin,' and 'erythromycin.' These
`terms were searched both as text words and as subject headings.
`All searches were limited to controlled trials and systematic
`reviews. No year limits were applied to the searches and they
`therefore extend as far back as the year range of each database
`up to April 2011 when they were conducted. Retrievals in Ovid
`MEDLINE go back to 1976, EMBASE to 1985, and the Co(cid:173)
`chrane Library to 1966. The Cochrane Library retrievals derive
`primarily from the CENTRAL database, supplemented by a
`handful from the DARE and the Economic Evaluation data(cid:173)
`bases. For further details of the literature search strategy and
`citations retrieved, see Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://
`links.adisonline.com/DYZ/ A3.
`
`2. Mechanisms of Action of Anti-Acne Agents
`
`Several factors contribute to development of acne includ(cid:173)
`ing increased sebum production, abnormal keratinization with
`subsequent blockage of pilosebaceous ducts, microbial colo(cid:173)
`nization most often by Propionobacterium acnes, and inflam(cid:173)
`mation. Increased androgen levels at puberty result in greater
`sebum production contributing to the development of acne in
`this age group.131
`Benzoyl peroxide acts through three primary mechanisms
`in the control of acne: it is bactericidal to P. acnes and also
`exhibits comedolytic as well as mild anti-inflammatory ac-
`
`tivity.14-91 Benzoyl peroxide is lipophilic and concentrates inside
`sebaceous follicles to produce benzoic acid and reactive oxygen
`species. These products are thought to oxidize bacterial proteins
`thereby inhibiting protein and nucleotide synthesis, metabolic
`pathways, and mitochondrial activity.19-111 Benzoyl peroxide
`does not appear to select for resistant P. acnes primarily due
`to its mechanism of action.19-111 Antibiotics represent another
`primary drug category in the treatment of acne vulgaris.
`Erythromycin, a macrolide antibiotic, clindamycin, a lincosamide
`derivative, and tetracycline are the primary antibiotics utilized.
`All are bacteriostatic and interact with ribosomal subunits
`to inhibit protein synthesis.112-141 These antibiotics inhibit syn(cid:173)
`thesis of lipase, which is utilized by P. acnes for hydrolyzing
`serum triglycerides to glycerol (a bacterial growth substrate)
`and proinflammatory free fatty acids. Antibiotics also inhibit
`complement pathways and impair neutrophil chemotaxisPSJ
`Topical antibiotics are most effective in the treatment of in(cid:173)
`flammatory lesions but demonstrate mild activity against
`non-inflamed lesions and their use may contribute to the de(cid:173)
`velopment of bacterial resistance.116,171
`Retinoids are derivatives of vitamin A (retinol) that act by
`binding retinoic acid receptors and retinoic X receptors. Reti(cid:173)
`noids are desquamating agents that regulate differentiation and
`proliferation of keratinocytes and modulate keratinocyte ad(cid:173)
`hesion molecules_[l 7, 18l Retinoids also control inflammation by
`inhibiting neutrophil chemotaxis, toll receptor expression, and
`reactive oxygen species production on leukocytes_[1 8l Systemic
`retinoids also reduce sebum production, but topical retinoids
`do not.1161 The newer retinoids, adapalene and tazarotene, are
`receptor selective and may be more efficacious than older ret(cid:173)
`inoid agents.118•191 Adapalene is thought to be better tolerated
`than other drugs in the retinoid category.1191
`Antibiotics, retinoids, and benzoyl peroxide have comple(cid:173)
`mentary mechanisms of action that may contribute to their
`synergistic activity when used in combination_[l7,zo,zi1 In gen(cid:173)
`eral, retinoids are more effective at reducing sebum production
`and keratinization, while antibiotics and benzoyl peroxide have
`greater effects at reducing
`inflammation and P. acnes
`counts.117•20,211 The desquamating effect of retinoids also in(cid:173)
`creases the penetration of antibiotics.122•231 Interestingly, use of
`benzoyl peroxide with retinoids may decrease retinoid activity
`although newer retinoids such as adapalene are more stable and
`may be used in combination with benzoyl peroxideP8,24l
`
`3. Benzoyl Peroxide
`
`Treatment of acne vulgaris with benzoyl peroxide alone or in
`combination with other topical treatments at concentrations of
`
`© 2012 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
`
`Am J Clin Dermatol 2012; 13 (3)
`
`2 of 12
`
`

`

`Topical Antimicrobial Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
`
`143
`
`2-5% is the standard of care for mild to moderate papular(cid:173)
`pustular acne_l4,7-9,2o,25,26l Use of benzoyl peroxide 2.5% ap(cid:173)
`pears to offer similar benefit to the 5% and 10% concentrations
`with fewer associated adverse effects.l9,27J Benzoyl peroxide
`monotherapy has been shown to have greater activity than topi(cid:173)
`cal tretinoin or isotretinoin against inflammatory lesions,117,28,291
`although two smaller trials demonstrated similar efficacy for
`both agents.117,3o,3i1
`Benzoyl peroxide is available in a variety of preparations
`including gels, washes, lotions, and creams. There is no clear
`superiority of these different preparations in terms of effec(cid:173)
`tiveness.14,321 Newer delivery systems to enhance efficacy and
`tolerability are also being investigated but have not been rig(cid:173)
`orously evaluated in comparison with current benzoyl peroxide
`formulations.111,33-37J
`
`4. Topical Antibiotics
`
`Topical antibiotics are most effective for treating inflam(cid:173)
`matory acne, with limited efficacy against non-inflammatory
`lesionsP81 The most commonly available antibiotics for topical
`treatment of acne are erythromycin and clindamycin. Bacterial
`resistance is a persistent problem with antibiotics, especially
`when they are used as monotherapyP91 The efficacy of
`erythromycin, in particular, may be declining due to bacterial
`resistance.16,16·17J Increasing bacterial resistance has led many
`experts to recommend against the use of antibiotics as mono(cid:173)
`therapy. Nevertheless, topical antibiotics continue to play an
`important role in the treatment of acne in combination with
`other topical treatments including benzoyl peroxide, topical
`retinoids, or azelaic acid.
`
`5. Benzoyl Peroxide and Antibiotic Combinations
`
`The benefit of combining topical antibiotics with benzoyl
`peroxide over using either as monotherapy has been demonstrated
`in several trials_l25,4o-431 Two large randomized, double-blind,
`controlled studies from 2008 showed that benzoyl peroxide 2.5%
`and clindamycin 1.2% gel significantly reduced lesion counts
`and demonstrated similar tolerability compared with clinda(cid:173)
`mycin or benzoyl peroxide monotherapy.1431 A smaller study
`from 2009 found that a novel solubilized form of benzoyl per(cid:173)
`oxide 5% alone showed greater reduction of non-inflammatory
`lesions compared with combined benzoyl peroxide 5% and
`clindamycin 1 %. Both groups showed comparable reduction of
`inflammatory lesions although benzoyl peroxide displayed
`more early adverse cutaneous effects than combination ther(cid:173)
`apy1441 (see table I).
`
`A recent meta-analysis determined that combination ben(cid:173)
`zoyl peroxide 2.5% or 5% with clindamycin outperformed benzoyl
`peroxide and clindamycin monotherapy in treating inflamma(cid:173)
`tory lesions and that reduction of non-inflammatory lesions
`with benzoyl peroxide 2.5% and clindamycin was significantly
`greater than any of the other treatments.1471 A study by another
`group1481 also showed that benzoyl peroxide 2.5% and clindamycin
`preparation demonstrated similar efficacy to benzoyl peroxide 5%
`and clindamycin preparation but was better tolerated.
`A randomized controlled trial of patients with mild to moderate
`inflammatory acne with a 4-week washout prior to trial entry,
`showed that topical treatment regimens containing erythromycin
`and benzoyl peroxide outperformed oral tetracycline regimens for
`treating resistant acne with fewer systemic adverse effects.146,491
`Benzoyl peroxide monotherapy produced similar results to com(cid:173)
`bined erythromycin and benzoyl peroxide treatment in both pri(cid:173)
`mary outcome measures, although it produced greater skin irrita(cid:173)
`tion than the erythromycin and benzoyl peroxide combination.146,491
`
`6. Retinoid and Antibiotic Combinations
`
`Topical retinoid and antibiotic combination therapies are
`also indicated for the treatment of patients with mild to moderate
`inflammatory acne. Several studies have demonstrated that
`combination therapy with topical retinoids and antibiotics pro(cid:173)
`duces significantly faster and greater clearance of acne than
`topical antibiotics or topical retinoids alone.15o-541 The combina(cid:173)
`tion ofretinoids with antibiotics may be less irritating to the skin
`compared with monotherapyl52·53·55·561 although one groupl501
`noted that adapalene and clindamycin combination therapy was
`more irritating than either agent used alone.
`Combining clindamycin with the newer topical retinoids
`adapalene and tazarotene is more efficacious than clindamycin
`and tretinoin combination therapy.1571 Adapalene also causes
`significantly less skin irritation than tretinoin when used in
`combination with topical clindamycin.1581 Unfortunately, these
`agents are also more costly. As with benzoyl peroxide and anti(cid:173)
`biotic preparations, topical retinoids and antibiotics combi(cid:173)
`nation therapy can be prescribed as separate products that are
`used together or fixed combination preparations that exist as a
`single product, the former being less expensive, with the latter
`being easier to use.
`
`7. Other Topical Treatment Options
`
`Additional options for topical treatment of acne include
`dapsone, zinc, sodium sulfacetamide, salicylic acid, azelaic acid,
`and allylamines. Topical dapsone 5%, alone or in combination
`
`© 2012 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
`
`Am J Clin Dermatol 2012; 13 (3)
`
`3 of 12
`
`

`

`144
`
`Gamble et al.
`
`Table I. Trials of BPO and antibiotic combination therapy published since 2004
`
`Study
`(no. of patients)
`
`Kircik et al.I441
`(n=65)
`
`Design
`
`Treatment
`
`Results
`
`Adverse effects
`
`Twice daily for 4 or 12 wk:
`Randomized, investigator-
`blind, multicenter 4 or 12 wk solubilized BPO 5% gel to one
`side of face; CL 1 % and BPO
`split-face study in patients
`aged 11-45 y with
`5% gel to contralateral side of
`moderate acne
`the face
`
`Well tolerated; less than mild dryness,
`Solubilized BPO gel showed
`erythema, peeling, stinging and
`greater reduction in non-
`inflammatory lesion count than did burning and itching; significantly
`CL and BPO at wk 1 and 2
`higher for solubilized BPO within the
`(p ~ 0.01) as well as at wk 3, 4, and
`first 3 wk of treatment but comparable
`12 (p ~ 0.05); comparable
`between both regimens by wk 4
`reductions in inflammatory lesion
`count at all timepoints
`
`Two, randomized, double- Once daily: CL 1.2% and BPO The absolute and percentage
`Thiboutot
`et al.I431 (n = 2813) blind, controlled,
`2.5% gel; CL 1.2% gel; BPO
`reduction in inflammatory, non-
`multicenter, parallel, 12wk 2.5% gel; vehicle control gel
`inflammatory, and total lesion
`studies in patients with
`counts in the CL and BPO
`combination group was
`moderate to severe acne
`significantly higher than the other
`groups (p < 0.001)
`
`Well tolerated; mild to moderate
`erythema, scaling, burning,
`itching, and stinging
`
`Langner et al.1451
`(n=130)
`
`Randomized, investigator- Once daily: CL 1 % and BPO
`blind, multicenter, parallel-
`5%; adapalene 0.1 %
`group 12 wk study of
`patients aged 12-39 y with
`mild to moderate acne
`
`CL and BPO had an earlier onset Well tolerated; mild dryness,
`of action and showed greater
`erythema, scaling, burning, and
`reductions in inflammatory lesions pruritus; CL and BPO generally had
`(p~0.001) as well as total lesions
`fewer reports of adverse effects
`(p~0.004)
`
`Ozolins et al.I46I
`(n=649)
`
`Randomized, investigator(cid:173)
`blind 18wktrial in patients
`with mild to moderate acne
`
`Oral oxytetracycline 500 mg
`Topical BPO and topical ERY plus Adverse systemic effects more likely
`to occur with oral antibiotics; local
`twice daily plus topical placebo BPO were as effective as oral
`irritation more likely with topical
`twice daily; minocycline 100 mg oxytetracycline and minocycline;
`treatments (especially BPO)
`once daily plus topical placebo BPO was the most cost-effective
`twice daily; topical BPO 5%
`treatment; the topical regimens
`were most effective in treating
`twice daily plus oral placebo
`once daily; topical ERY 3% and
`resistant Propionobacterium
`BPO 5% combination twice
`acnes
`daily plus oral placebo once
`daily; topical ERY 3% in the
`morning and BPO 5% at night
`plus oral placebo once daily
`BPO = benzoyl peroxide; CL= clindamycin; ERV= erythromycin.
`
`with adapalene 0.1 % or benzoyl peroxide 4%, has been shown
`to be safe and efficacious, but may be more irritating to the skin
`than other topical agents[59-611 (see table II).
`Topical antibiotics are also available in combination with
`zinc acetate. While zinc is ineffective as mono therapy, [41 a small,
`single-blind study of patients with mild to moderate acne treated
`with benzoyl peroxide 5% plus clindamycin 1 % or erythromycin
`4% plus zinc acetate 1.2% once daily found that, although both
`regimens improved total lesion count, clindamycin plus benzoyl
`peroxide had an earlier onset of action and showed significantly
`greater reductions of inflammatory lesions as well as total
`lesions.[641
`A small observational study demonstrated that 20% sodium
`sulfacetamide, when used in combination with a 50% sulfur
`
`foam, decreases acne, rosacea, and seborrheic dermatitis lesions
`without adverse effects.[65J Limited evidence also shows that sali(cid:173)
`cylic acid alone,[41 or in combination with benzoyl peroxide[661
`can improve acne. While limited safety data exist, it has been
`suggested as an alternative for patients who cannot tolerate
`topical retinoid therapy.[41 An Iranian trial of patients randomly
`assigned to combination azelaic acid 5% and clindamycin 2%,
`or either agent alone, showed that the combination gel sig(cid:173)
`nificantly reduced total lesion count compared with baseline, as
`well as clindamycin 2% or azelaic acid 5% monotherapy.[621 The
`same group found similar results when combining azelaic acid
`with erythromycin and noted that the combination was more
`tolerable than either agent used alone.[631 Other studies have
`shown that azelaic acid at concentrations of 15-20% demon-
`
`© 2012 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
`
`Am J Clin Dermatol 2012; 13 (3)
`
`4 of 12
`
`

`

`Topical Antimicrobial Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
`
`145
`
`strates efficacy and tolerability comparable to tretinoin, benzoyl
`peroxide, and erythromycin monotherapy for the treatment of
`mild to moderate forms of acne.[67·681 Combination therapy
`utilizing benzoyl peroxide in combination with an allylamine
`(an antifungal agent), demonstrated more effective control of
`comedones than benzoyl peroxide monotherapy.[691
`
`8. Bacterial Resistance
`
`The long-term, low-dose antibiotic regimens often pre(cid:173)
`scribed for acne treatment have been associated with increasing
`P. acnes resistance.l17•701 Macrolides, such as erythromycin, are
`most associated with the development of bacterial resistance,
`although resistance to clindamycin, tetracycline, and other anti(cid:173)
`biotics is also quite high.[12·15-17•71•721 A study of P. acnes isolates
`in the UK found that resistance to erythromycin and clinda(cid:173)
`mycin increased from nearly 35% in 1991 to over 55%
`in 2OOOP3l A similar study comparing patterns of resistance
`in several European countries found that resistance to erythro(cid:173)
`mycin and clindamycin may be as high as 90% in some re(cid:173)
`gionsP4l P. acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis strains can
`
`transfer resistance to Staphylococcus aureus and increase the
`lethality of that organism.[91 These findings have prompted
`scientists to recommend against the use of topical or oral anti(cid:173)
`biotics as monotherapy for acne vulgaris_[4,i5,39,7i,75,76l Data
`indicate that, since 2003, approximately 80% of prescriptions
`for topical antibiotics written by dermatologists are split evenly
`between clindamycin and combination clindamycin and ben(cid:173)
`zoyl peroxide gel medicationsP2•14l
`Benzoyl peroxide appears to be effective in controlling both
`antibiotic-sensitive and antibiotic-resistant P. acnes.[91 Use of
`combined agents may allow for reduced dosages of antibiotics
`and lessen selection pressure for resistance.[91 Use of benzoyl
`peroxide may also help slow the spread of antibiotic-resistant
`S. epidermidis strains, which are associated with resistance in
`S. aureus.[91 One expert panel recommends that if antibiotics
`must be used for longer than 2 months, benzoyl peroxide should
`be utilized for at least 5-7 days between antibiotic courses to
`avoid resistanceP7•20l Combination treatment with different
`types of oral and topical antibiotics should be avoided.[17,771
`Another potential strategy for reducing the spread of anti(cid:173)
`biotic-resistant strains may be to eliminate the use of antibiotics
`
`Table II. Trials of dapsone, azelaic acid, and zinc combination therapy published since 2004
`
`Design
`
`Treatment
`
`Study
`(no. of patients)
`Fleischer et al.I611 Randomized, double-blind, Dapsone 5% gel twice daily plus
`(n = 301)
`12 wk study in patients with
`adapalene 0.1 % gel once daily;
`moderate acne
`dapsone 5% gel twice daily plus
`BPO 4% gel once daily; dapsone
`5% gel twice daily plus moisturizer
`once daily
`
`Pazoki-Toroudi
`et al.162I (n = 130)
`
`Randomized, double-blind, Azelaic acid 5% and CL 2%;
`12 wk study of patients with
`azelaic acid 5%; CL 2%
`mild to moderate acne
`
`Results
`
`Adverse effects
`
`All treatment groups showed a
`decrease in inflammatory lesions
`and were not significantly
`different; dapsone plus adapalene
`showed significantly greater
`improvement in non-inflammatory
`and total lesion count vs dapsone
`plus moisturizer (p<0.001 and
`p<0.004, respectively)
`
`Combination azelaic acid and CL
`significantly reduced lesion
`counts compared with azelaic
`acid (p < 0.01) or CL (p < 0.05)
`
`Well tolerated; more adverse
`events in the dapsone plus
`adapalene group including
`pruritus and burning
`
`Patients significantly more
`satisfied with azelaic acid and
`CL combination; no significant
`difference in adverse effects
`among treatment groups
`
`Pazoki-Toroudi
`et a1.I53I (n = 147)
`
`Combination azelaic acid and
`Randomized, double-blind, Azelaic acid 5% and ERV 2%;
`12 wk study of patients with
`azelaic acid 5%; ERV 2%; placebo ERV significantly reduced lesion
`mild to moderate acne
`counts compared with azelaic
`acid (p<0.05), ERV (p<0.01),
`or placebo (p<0.001)
`
`Azelaic acid and ERV
`combination demonstrated
`fewer adverse effects than
`azelaic acid or ERV
`monotherapy
`
`Langner et al.I641
`(n=148)
`
`Randomized, investigator(cid:173)
`blind, multicenter, parallel(cid:173)
`group, 12 wk study of
`patients aged 12-39 y with
`mild to moderate acne
`BPO = benzoyl peroxide; CL= clindamycin; ERV= erythromycin.
`
`ERV 4% and zinc acetate 1.2%
`twice daily; CL 1 % and BPO 5%
`gel once daily
`
`CL and BPO had an earlier onset Well tolerated, mild and
`of action and showed greater
`intermittent scaling, erythema,
`reductions in inflammatory lesions
`dryness, pruritus, and burning
`(p=0.029) as well as total lesions
`(p=0.017)
`
`© 2012 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
`
`Am J Clin Dermatol 2012; 13 (3)
`
`5 of 12
`
`

`

`146
`
`Gamble et al.
`
`Table Ill. Trials comparing BPO, topical antibiotic, and topical retinoid combination therapy published since 2004
`
`Treatment
`
`Results
`
`Design
`
`Study
`(no. of patients)
`Leyden, et al.C811 Open-label, single-center, 4 wk
`Adapalene 0.1 % and BPO 2.5% Mean total P. acnes bacterial
`(n=30)
`study in patients with high levels combination gel applied to
`counts decreased significantly
`of Propionobacterium acnes of
`(p<0.001); resistance to
`forehead once daily
`P. acnes highest for ERV and
`the facial skin including various
`CL; P. acnes resistance to all
`levels of resistance to ERV, CL,
`and tetracycline
`antibiotics was significantly
`decreased at the end of the
`study
`Jackson et al.C82I Randomized, investigator-blind, Once daily: CL 1 % and BPO 5%; CL and BPO had greater
`reductions in P. acnes counts
`(n=54)
`two-center, parallel-group,
`CL 1.2% and tretinoin 0.025%
`(p = 0.0030); CL and BPO
`16 wk study in patients aged
`~12 y with moderate to
`showed earlier onset of action;
`reductions in inflammatory, non-
`moderately severe acne
`inflammatory, and total lesion
`counts were similar between
`groups by wk 16
`
`Adverse effects
`
`Well tolerated; specific adverse
`effects were not commented on
`
`Well tolerated; mild dryness,
`pruritus, burning, and peeling
`
`Gollnick et al.C51 l
`(n=1670)
`
`Randomized, double-blind,
`transatlantic, multicenter,
`controlled, 12 wk study in
`patients aged ~12 y with
`moderate acne
`
`Once daily: adapalene 0.1 % and Adapalene and BPO combination Well tolerated; mild to moderate
`dryness
`BPO 2.5% gel; adapalene 0.1 %; was significantly more effective
`BPO 2.5%; vehicle control gel
`(p<0.001) in decreasing
`percentage lesion count than
`either monotherapy or vehicle
`
`Bowman et al.C83I Randomized, investigator-blind,
`(n=132)
`multicenter, 10wkstudyin
`patients aged 12-30y with mild
`to moderate acne
`
`CL 1 % and BPO 5% gel once
`daily; tretinoin 0.025% gel plus
`CL 1 % gel once daily; CL 1 % and
`BPO 5% gel in the morning and
`tretinoin 0.025% gel plus CL 1 %
`gel in the evening
`
`CL and BPO group and CL and
`BPO plus tretinoin group had
`significantly greater reduction in
`inflammatory lesions than
`tretinoin plus CL group (p=0.05
`and p = 0.02, respectively)
`
`Well tolerated; mild to moderate
`irritation and dryness;
`substantially more adverse
`events reported for combination
`regimen than either regimen
`alone; overall more adverse
`effects with tretinoin-containing
`regimens
`
`BPO = benzoyl peroxide; CL= clindamycin; ERV= erythromycin.
`
`altogether and combine other topical agents. Benzoyl peroxide
`in combination with topical retinoids is one option, as neither
`retinoids nor benzoyl peroxide creates selective pressure for
`resistance. While there have been some trials evaluating the
`efficacy and tolerability of this approach, there is limited evi(cid:173)
`dence of its effect on microbial resistanceP8•791 A randomized,
`double-blind study of combination adapalene and benzoyl
`peroxide therapy in patients with moderate to moderately se(cid:173)
`vere acne found that lesion count was significantly improved in
`the group treated with adapalene 0.1 % and benzoyl peroxide
`2.5% compared with either agent alone or placebo_l75,so1 The
`frequency of adverse events and cutaneous tolerability for
`adapalene and benzoyl peroxide were comparable to that ob(cid:173)
`served with adapalene monotherapy, although resistance was
`not specifically addressed_l75,so1 A small open-label study eval(cid:173)
`uated the effectiveness of combination adapalene 0.1 % and
`
`benzoyl peroxide 2.5% in reducing antibiotic-sensitive and
`-resistant strains of P. acnes on the facial skin of study subjects.
`All subjects had strains sensitive and resistant to erythromycin,
`clindamycin, and tetracyclines at baseline. Mean counts of eryth(cid:173)
`romycin-, clindamycin-, and tetracycline-resistant P. acnes were
`significantly decreased by week 41811 (see table III).
`
`9. Treatment Selection
`
`9.1 Expert Guidelines
`
`There is expert consensus that combination therapies are
`more efficacious and less susceptible to bacterial resistance
`than monotherapy alone.l4,75,s41 All of these guidelines illus(cid:173)
`trate similar approaches in which initial therapy selection is
`
`© 2012 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
`
`Am J Clin Dermatol 2012; 13 (3)
`
`6 of 12
`
`

`

`Topical Antimicrobial Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
`
`147
`
`based on the severity and inflammatory nature of the lesions[t7J
`(see table IV).
`The guidelines differ, however, in their recommendations
`regarding selection of topical medications_[4,3s,75,76,85l Practical
`advice on how to manage acne based upon a systematic search
`of evidence is provided by the NHS Clinical Knowledge Sum(cid:173)
`maries (CKS) guideline138l from the UK, including treatment
`options for mild to severe disease (see table IV).
`
`9.2 Comparing Combination Therapies
`
`As noted in a 2003 expert report, there is a need to perform
`well controlled trials comparing benzoyl peroxide with the
`newer topical retinoids.1201 Indeed, there are few robust studies
`comparing various combination regimens ofbenzoyl peroxide,
`clindamycin, and retinoids (see table III).
`One study[82l evaluated the efficacy of clindamycin 1.2% and
`tretinoin 0.025% gel with clindamycin 1 % and benzoyl peroxide
`5% gel. While the clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide combi(cid:173)
`nation group had a faster reduction in inflammatory and total
`lesion counts compared with the tretinoin combination group,
`
`reduction in inflammatory, non-inflammatory, and total acne
`lesions were similar by the end of the 16-week study.1821 Re(cid:173)
`ductions in clindamycin-resistant P. acnes colonization occurred
`only in the benzoyl peroxide group, but overall reduction in
`disease severity was comparable at 87% for the tretinoin com(cid:173)
`bination group and 80% for the benzoyl peroxide combination
`group.1s21
`A relatively small, single-blind study of patients with mild to
`moderate acne[83·861 compared the efficacy of tretinoin 0.025%
`and clindamycin 1 % gel once daily versus benzoyl peroxide 5%
`and clindamycin 1 % gel once daily versus benzoyl peroxide 5%
`and clindamycin 1 % applied in the morning with tretinoin
`0.025% plus clindamycin 1 % applied in the evening. Treatment
`groups with benzoyl peroxide (benzoyl peroxide and clinda(cid:173)
`mycin, and benzoyl peroxide and clindamycin plus tretinoin)
`had significantly greater reductions in inflammatory lesions as
`well as greater reductions in non-inflammatory lesions at week
`10. All three regimens were safe and generally well tolerated,
`although agents with tretinoin initially caused more irritation,
`dryness, desquamation, and erythema. It has been suggested
`that these results should be viewed with cauti

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket