throbber
(~\ World Health
`9
`Organization
`
`20,AVENUE APPIA- CH-121 1 GENEVA27- SWITZERLAND - TEL CENTRAL +4122 791 211 1- FAXCENTRAL +41 22 791 3111 - WWW.WHO.INT
`
`QSM/ MC/ IEA.117
`
`4 March 2008
`
`Information Exchange System
`
`Alert No_ 117
`
`Antimalarial chlorproguanil-dapsone (LapDapTJ\1) withdrawn following demonstration of
`post-treatment haemolytic anaemia in G6PD deficient patients in a Phase III trial of
`chlorproguanil-dapsone-artesunate (DacartTM) versus artemether-lumefantrine
`(Coartem®) and confirmation of findings in a comparative trial
`of LapDap™ versus Dacart T M
`
`GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) have decided to tenninate the
`
`fmther development ofDaca1t™, a fixed-dose combination antimalarial product of chlorproguanil,
`
`dapsone and a1tesunate (CDA). GSK has also commenced a product recall process at pha1macy level in
`
`Kenya, for LapDap™, another anti-malarial product containing chlorproguanil and dapsone (CD). These
`
`decisions are based on data from two Phase III clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of CDA
`
`(Daca1tTM) and CD (LapDapTM); significant reductions of haemoglobin levels in patients with G6PD
`
`deficiency have been observed with both CDA and CD.
`
`Background information
`
`Chlorproguanil-dapsone (LapDapTJ\1)
`
`This product was granted a marketing authorization in July 2003 by the United Kingdom Medicines and
`
`Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria.
`
`Chlorproguanil-dapsone (CD) was contraindicated in patients with known glucose-6-phosphate
`
`dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. In view of the potential widespread use of CD (LapDap™) in malaria
`
`endemic sub-Saharan Africa, the high prevalence of G6PD deficiency in the region ( estimated to affect
`
`around 10-25% of the population in sub-Saharan Africa) and the limited availability of screening tests for
`
`this genetic condition in Africa, WHO had unde1taken a safety assessment of the product in 2004, to
`
`provide recommendations on the safe use of CD (LapDap™) in Africa.
`
`The WHO expe1t group cautioned against the use of the medicine in G6PD deficient patients and made
`
`the following recommendations:
`
`1. This medicine should be used only if a diagnosis of malaria is confiimed.
`2. CD should be used only after severe anaemia (haemoglobin concentration < 5 g/dl) and
`
`~Wf ~I~ • fil"W.E~ffl~
`Organisation mondiale de la Sante • BceMHPHas:t opraHH3~HSI 3JipasooxpaH8HHJl
`1 of2
`
`Almirall EXHIBIT 2048
`
`Amneal v. Almirall
`IPR2019-00207
`
`

`

`Page2
`
`G6PD deficiency have been excluded by appropriate tests. In patients with a haemoglobin
`
`concentration of 7 g/dl, administration of CD should be considered with caution and should be
`
`undertaken only under clinical supervision, with monitoring of the haemoglobin concentration. The
`
`diagnosis of methaemoglobinaemia is less impo1tant.
`
`3. In areas where G6PD deficiency is prevalent but appropriate tests are not available, an alternative
`
`antimalarial medicine should be used.
`4. If there is no suitable alternative, CD should be used but in cognizance of the haematological risks
`
`associated with this medicine.
`
`The group also advised that these recommendations should be reconsidered when more data become
`
`available from phaimacovigilance and active post-marketing smveillance.
`
`The WHO safety assessment repo1t also provided a series of recommendations for ongoing and planned
`
`clinical trials as well as phase IV studies to gather the necessary evidence on safety of CD (LapDap™),
`
`including in malaria patients with G6PD deficiency. However, several CD (LapDapTM) phase IV studies
`
`which sta1ted in African countries did not continue beyond April 2006 due to low utilization of this
`
`medicine. Research on the safety aspects mainly continued as pait of the Medicines for Malaria Venture
`
`(MMV)- sponsored studies on chlorproguanil-dapsone-aitesunate (CDA).
`
`Chlorproguanil-dapsone-artesunate (Daca1i TM)
`
`GSK's multi-center, double-blind Phase ill clinical trial of chlorproguanil-dapsone-a1tesunate (CDA)
`
`versus the combination antimalarial lumefantrine-a1temether (Coaitem®) in Africa suggest a strong
`
`association between haemolytic anaemia and CDA treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malai'ia in
`
`G6PD deficient patients. The study included 1372 patients. Study results showed a significant reduction
`
`in haemoglobin due to haemolytic anaemia in patients with G6PD deficiency, with lowest levels of
`
`haemoglobin occun-ing seven days after treatment. At day 7, 35% of the patients with G6PD deficiency
`
`treated with CDA had a reduction in haemoglobin of more than 2 g/dl compai·ed to 8% of patients treated
`
`with Coa1tem®, and 10% of the patients with G6PD deficiency treated with CDA had a reduction in
`
`haemoglobin of more than 4 g/dl compared to 0% of patients treated with Coa1tem®. 38% of the male
`
`patients with G6PD deficiency had severe anaemia after treatment with CDA, compai·ed to 0% in the
`
`group treated with Coaitem®. In total, 15 patients had severe post-treatment haemolysis requiring blood
`
`transfusion in the study: all 15 were in the CDA treated group, 13 of whom were G6PD deficient.
`
`References:
`
`1. Press Release. GlaxoSmithKline and Medicines for Malai-ia Venture, 29 February 2008, London,
`
`UK; Geneva, Switzerland.
`
`2. Review of the safety of chlorproguanil-dapsone in the treatment of uncomplicated fakiparnm
`
`malaria in Afi-ica: Repo1t of a Technical Consultation convened by the World Health
`
`Organization. WHO, 2005, Switzerland (http://www.who.int/malaria/docs/LapDap.pdf).
`
`~WI ~ f ~ • 1!t,WJ!~fflffl
`Organisation mondiale de la Sante • BceMHPHIUl opraHH381.1HR a,qpaBOOxpaHeHHR • Organizacion Mundial de la Salud
`2 of2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket