throbber
LEADING ARTICLE
`
`Am J Clin Dermatol 2012; 13 (6): 357-364
`1175-0561/12/0006-0357/$49.95/0
`Adis ª 2012 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved.
`
`Newer Approaches to the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
`
`Thierry Simonart
`
`Private Practice, Brussels, Belgium
`
`Abstract
`
`The multifactorial etiology of acne vulgaris makes it challenging to treat. Current treatments include
`topical retinoids, benzoyl peroxide, topical and systemic antibiotics, azelaic acid, and systemic isotretinoin.
`Adjunctive and/or emerging approaches include topical dapsone, taurine bromamine, resveratrol, chemical
`peels, optical treatments, as well as complementary and alternative medications. The purpose of this paper is
`to discuss the therapies available for acne and their latest developments, including new treatment strategies
`(i.e. re-evaluation of the use of oral antibiotics and avoidance of topical antibiotic monotherapy, use of
`subantimicrobial antibiotic dosing, use of low-dose isotretinoin, optical treatments), new formulations
`(microsponges, liposomes, nanoemulsions, aerosol foams), new combinations (fixed-combination products
`of topical retinoids and topical antibiotics [essentially clindamycin] or benzoyl peroxide), new agents (topical
`dapsone, taurine bromamine, resveratrol) and their rationale and likely place in treatment. Acne vaccines,
`topical natural antimicrobial peptides, and lauric acid represent other promising therapies.
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Acne vulgaris is one of the most common disorders en-
`countered in dermatology practice.[1,2] Epidemiologic studies
`in Western industrialized countries estimated the prevalence
`of acne in adolescents to be between 50% and 95%, depend-
`ing on the method of lesion counting.[3-5] Although acne is
`a disease primarily of adolescence, it may, to some degree,
`persist into adulthood in a significant proportion of in-
`dividuals, particularly women.[4,6] The disease burden of acne
`has the ability to elicit in some sufferers significant mental
`health concerns due to a heightened sense of shame relating to
`appearance.[7,8]
`Current understanding of acne pathogenesis continues to
`evolve. Acne is an androgen-dependent disorder of piloseb-
`aceous follicles. There are four primary pathogenic factors that
`interact to produce acne lesions: (i) increased and altered an-
`drogen-dependent sebum production; (ii) altered keratinization
`leading to comedones; (iii) Propionibacterium acnes follicular
`colonization; and (iv) release of inflammatory mediators into
`the skin.[1,2] Although family history and environment factors
`have an important role in the disease, the exact sequence of
`events and how they interact remains unclear. Management,
`therefore, is a multifactorial approach with several treatment
`options targeted toward the multiple factors contributing to
`acne pathogenesis. Treatment decisions for patients with acne
`
`are compounded by the profusion of available treatments and
`by the relative paucity of trials with active comparators. Con-
`cerns about antibiotic resistance and isotretinoin safety as well
`as the rise of novel adjunctive treatments bring new perspectives
`to the treatment of acne. Alternatives to refractory acne,
`aversion to prescription medications, adverse effects to con-
`ventional therapy, and poor adherence to conventional therapy
`drive interest in novel approaches. This review summarizes the
`latest developments in the treatment of acne and their rationale
`and likely place in treatment.
`
`1.1 Literature Search Parameters
`
`An extensive search was performed at the beginning of the
`project. A systematic electronic search strategy was used to
`retrieve all the recently published (January 2007–December
`2011) clinical trials investigating therapies for acne. This review
`focused on the therapy of acne and not on other forms of acne.
`We obtained data from MEDLINE (National Library of
`Medicine), PubMed, Current Contents, HomInform (Glasgow)
`[database of references to journal articles and books on home-
`opathy], reference lists, and textbooks. There was no restriction
`on language. The selected keywords were ‘acne,’ ‘comedones,’
`‘vulgaris,’ ‘treatment,’ ‘therapy,’ ‘retinoids,’ ‘isotretinoin,’ ‘ben-
`zoyl peroxide,’ ‘azelaic acid,’ ‘antibiotics,’ ‘dapsone,’ ‘laser,’
`‘light therapies,’ ‘vaccines,’ and ‘antimicrobial peptides.’
`
`1 of 8
`
`Almirall EXHIBIT 2030
`
`Amneal v. Almirall
`IPR2019-00207
`
`

`

`358
`
`Simonart
`
`2. Acne Therapy
`
`Table I. Conventional, emerging, and experimental anti-acne therapies for
`
`The large number of products and product combinations,
`and the scarcity of comparative studies, has led to disparate
`guidelines. Because of the paucity of evidence, these guidelines
`rely on the opinions of experts, many of whom declare significant
`potential conflicts of interest.[2,9-12] Conventional treatments
`include topical retinoids, benzoyl peroxide, azelaic acid, topical
`and systemic antibiotics, systemic isotretinoin, and combined
`oral contraceptives for women.[2,9-12] Novel approaches en-
`compass recent developments in conventional treatments as
`well as emerging therapies. These different therapies are sum-
`marized in table I.
`
`2.1 Retinoids
`
`2.1.1 Topical Retinoid Therapy
`Topical retinoids represent a mainstay of acne treatment
`because they expel mature comedones, reduce microcomedone
`formation, and exert anti-inflammatory effects through a
`number of pathways, including downregulating toll-like re-
`ceptors, cytokines, and nitric oxide.[13] Topical retinoids have a
`favorable safety profile distinct from the toxicity of their sys-
`temic counterparts. They are contraindicated in pregnancy, and
`women of childbearing age must use effective contraception.
`Local adverse effects, including erythema, dryness, itching, and
`stinging, occur frequently during the early treatment phase.
`Their impact varies with the vehicle formation, skin type, fre-
`quency and mode of application, use of moisturizers, and envi-
`ronment factors such as sun exposure or temperature.[13] They do
`not seem to cause temporary worsening of acne lesions.[14]
`The broad anti-acne activity and safety profile of topical
`retinoids justifies their use as first-line treatment in mild to
`moderate forms of acne, more particularly in comedonal forms
`of acne, as well as for maintenance therapy;[9-13] these agents
`can also minimize the potential for relapse, which is part of the
`natural history of acne.[15]
`inves-
`A meta-analysis of five multicenter, randomized,
`tigator-blind trials involving 900 patients showed adapalene
`0.1% gel to be as effective as, but less irritating than tretinoin
`0.025% gel,[16] so that adapalene should be selected in prefer-
`ence to tretinoin and isotretinoin.
`Fixed-combination products of topical retinoids and topical
`antibiotics (essentially clindamycin) or benzoyl peroxide are
`significantly more efficacious in reducing the number of inflam-
`matory and non-inflammatory lesions compared with retinoid
`monotherapy.[17-19] Furthermore, patients taking combination
`therapy show faster signs of improvement.[20] The quicker onset
`
`acne vulgaris
`
`Therapies
`
`Conventional
`
`Topical therapies
`
`Topical retinoids
`
`Fixed-combination products of topical
`retinoids and topical antibiotics or BPO
`
`BPO
`
`Azelaic acid
`
`Topical antibiotics
`
`Systemic therapies
`
`Isotretinoin
`
`Systemic antibiotics
`
`Oral contraceptives
`
`Emerging
`
`Topical dapsone
`
`Taurine bromamine
`
`Chemical peels
`
`Optical treatments
`
`Complementary and alternative
`medications
`
`Sodium sulfacetaminde
`
`Resveratrol
`
`Experimental
`
`Main concerns
`
`Local irritation
`
`Local irritation
`
`Local irritation
`
`Local irritation
`
`Antibiotic resistance
`
`Safety concerns
`
`Antibiotic resistance
`
`Lack of comparisons with
`other standard therapies
`
`Lack of comparisons with
`other standard therapies
`
`Lack of comparisons with
`other standard therapies
`
`Lack of comparisons with
`other standard therapies,
`local adverse effects
`
`Lack of comparisons with
`other standard therapies, local
`adverse effects, high cost
`
`Inconclusive results
`
`Clinical data limited to case
`series
`
`Clinical data limited to one
`open-label pilot study
`
`Vaccination, natural antimicrobial peptides Absence of published clinical
`data
`
`BPO = benzoyl peroxide.
`
`of action is believed to lead to greater patient adherence and to
`reduce the amount of antibiotic exposure and risk of P. acnes
`resistance.
`Lately, formulation technology has focused on providing
`more efficient penetration of the retinoids into the skin layers or
`greater stability to the retinoid molecules so that lower con-
`centrations of retinoids might afford better tolerability, but
`maintain good efficacy. These potential novel systems for agent
`delivery include microsponges, liposomes, nanoemulsions, and
`aerosol foams. A micronized formulation of tretinoin (0.05%)
`
`Adis ª 2012 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved.
`
`Am J Clin Dermatol 2012; 13 (6)
`
`2 of 8
`
`

`

`Newer Approaches to Acne
`
`359
`
`gel has been developed that provides a more efficient delivery of
`tretinoin, because of its optimal particle size, no degradation by
`benzoyl peroxide, and better cutaneous tolerability than tretinoin
`microsphere (0.1%) gel without compromising efficacy.[21,22]
`Retinoic acid-loaded, solid, lipid nanoparticles represent an-
`other interesting alternative to reduce retinoic acid-induced
`skin irritation without reducing efficacy.[23] Retinol has a lower
`biologic activity but a better tolerability. Combination prod-
`ucts using retinol with substances with anti-inflammatory and
`antibacterial activity might increase this biologic activity.[24]
`
`2.1.2 Isotretinoin Therapy
`Oral isotretinoin was approved for use in acne in 1982.
`Targeting the four primary pathogenic factors of acne, it re-
`mains arguably the most effective acne medication available.
`Although comparative trials are missing, clinical experience
`confirms that the relapse rates after treatment with isotretinoin
`are the lowest among all the available therapies. Originally, it
`was reserved for severe, recalcitrant, nodular acne that was
`unresponsive to topical therapy. Although many authorities
`believe that isotretinoin should be reserved for severe acne not
`responding to appropriate antibiotics and topical therapy, the
`published data and opinion of some experts support systemic
`isotretinoin being considered as the first-line treatment for se-
`vere papulopustular, moderate nodular, and severe nodular/
`conglobate acne.[1,2,9-12,25,26] Reasons supporting oral
`iso-
`tretinoin as a first-line treatment for severe acne include clinical
`effectiveness, prevention of scarring, and quick improvement of
`a patient’s quality of life.
`The evidence on the best dosage, including cumulative dos-
`age, is rare and partly conflicting. In most trials, higher dosages
`have lead to better response rates whilst having less favorable
`safety/tolerability profiles. However, there is cumulative evi-
`dence that low-dose isotretinoin might be a useful treatment
`option for moderate acne.[26-28] Attempts to determine the cu-
`mulative dose necessary to obtain an optimal treatment re-
`sponse and low relapse rate have not yet yielded sufficient
`evidence for a strong recommendation. Research is also needed
`to investigate whether isotretinoin could be beneficial if used
`sooner for moderate cases. Although effective against severe
`acne, isotretinoin is associated with significant adverse effects,
`including cheilitis, dry skin and mucous membranes, epistaxis,
`increased risk of cutaneous Staphylococcus aureus infections,
`temporary worsening of lesions, photosensitivity, increased
`serum lipids, myalgias, hyperlipidemia, pseudotumor cerebri,
`and teratogenicity.[2] Associations with inflammatory bowel
`disease are controversial.[29,30] There are plausible biologic
`mechanisms by which retinoids might induce psychopathol-
`
`ogy.[2] A systematic review of isotretinoin use and depression
`and suicidal behavior published in 2007 did not find any evi-
`dence to support the notion that depressive symptoms or
`diagnosis increased after treatment, and some in fact, demon-
`strated a trend toward fewer or less severe depressive symptoms
`after isotretinoin therapy.[31] The picture is a complex one as
`depression and suicidal ideation occur with severe acne in the
`absence of isotretinoin treatment.[32,33] The current recom-
`mendation is that patients with severe acne with a history of
`attempted suicide should not automatically be refused iso-
`tretinoin but should be monitored for suicidal behavior after
`treatment has ended.[34] Claims of injury have fueled hysteria
`among laypersons about the use of this drug. Overwhelmed
`with worries of its potential adverse effects, the public forgets
`that withholding isotretinoin therapy is not without its own
`risks. Isotretinoin therapy can prevent lifelong and permanent
`physical and psychological scarring that comes as a matter of
`course with severe acne.[2,25,26,35] Over 20 million people
`worldwide have taken the drug, with several studies demon-
`strating its safety and few long-term adverse effects.[35]
`
`2.2 Antibiotics
`
`2.2.1 Topical Antibiotics
`How topical antibiotics improve acne has not been clearly
`defined, but they seem to act directly on P. acnes colonization
`and its subsequent proinflammatory effects on comedogenesis.
`The most commonly used topical antibiotics are clindamycin
`and erythromycin. However, studies on P. acnes resistance have
`highlighted the need for treatment guidelines to restrict the use
`of antibiotics in order to limit the emergence of resistant strains.
`It has been argued that the most likely effect of resistance is to
`reduce the clinical efficacy of antibiotic-based treatment regi-
`mens to a level below that which would occur in patients with
`fully susceptible flora.[36] Some trials have suggested a clear
`association between P. acnes resistance to the appropriate an-
`tibiotic and poor therapeutic response.[36] There is a gradual
`decrease in the efficacy of topical erythromycin in clinical trials
`of therapeutic intervention for acne, which is probably related
`to the development of antibiotic-resistant propionibacteria.[37]
`Decreased clinical efficacy of antibiotics for dermatologic
`conditions other than acne or for non-dermatologic infectious
`diseases appears as another major threat. Monotherapy with
`topical antibiotics is thus no longer recommended.[2,9-12,36-38]
`
`2.2.2 Systemic Antibiotics
`Although antibiotics have shown effectiveness in terms of
`reducing the number of acne lesions, most antibiotic courses are
`
`Adis ª 2012 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved.
`
`Am J Clin Dermatol 2012; 13 (6)
`
`3 of 8
`
`

`

`360
`
`Simonart
`
`not curative. The use of antibiotics for acne has been questioned
`owing to resistance concerns, especially since they are re-
`peatedly used for long periods at low doses. Furthermore, there
`is a low evidence level that oral antibiotics are more effective
`than topical preparations for mild-to-moderate facial acne.[39]
`Tetracyclines are the first-line oral antibiotic therapy in acne.
`Overall, there is insufficient evidence to support one tetra-
`cycline over another in terms of efficacy.[40] There could be no
`justification in continuing to use minocycline as a first-line
`therapy in acne because of an uncertainty safety profile and a
`lack of advantages over other tetracyclines (i.e. first-generation
`cyclines, doxycycline and lymecycline).[40,41]
`In the range of dosages investigated in the clinical studies,
`the tetracycline dosage seems to have no impact on efficacy.[40]
`Although two trials of subantimicrobial dosing (i.e. the pre-
`scription of low doses that are anti-inflammatory but not
`antimicrobial) have shown a reduction in the number of in-
`flammatory and non-inflammatory lesions,[42,43] the studies are
`too small to make reliable estimates of bacterial resistance that
`could be promoted by the lower doses used.
`As a consequence of resistance concerns, the use of oral
`antibiotics should be limited (indication, duration) and topical
`antibiotic monotherapy should be avoided.[2,9-12,36-38] Other
`recommendations are that we should use stricter cross-infection
`control measures when assessing acne in the clinic and combine
`any topical/systemic antibiotic therapy with broad-spectrum
`antibacterial agents, such as benzoyl peroxide.[11,36,43]
`Although oral macrolides like erythromycin may represent
`an alternative in patients who are intolerant or allergic to tet-
`racyclines and may be used in pregnancy, there is little evidence
`to support the use of other oral antibiotics (i.e. clindamycin,
`cotrimoxazole, quinolones).
`
`2.3 Benzoyl Peroxide
`
`Benzoyl peroxide is a safe and effective over-the-counter
`preparation that reduces the number of P. acnes by suppress-
`ing growth without the risk of resistance selection. Low con-
`centration (2.5% or 5%) benzoyl peroxide is recommended,
`since it is less irritating and there is no clear evidence that
`stronger preparations are more effective.[44] Single-agent ben-
`zoyl peroxide works as well as oral antibiotics. It has greater
`activity than topical tretinoin against inflammatory lesions.[45]
`The anti-acne activity and safety profile of benzoyl peroxide
`justifies its use as first-line treatment in mild to moderate
`forms of acne, more particularly in papular/pustular forms
`of acne.[12,46] Several studies suggest that the efficacy of ben-
`zoyl peroxide can be enhanced when used in combination
`
`with topical retinoids, antibiotics (essentially clindamycin[19,46]
`and, more recently, nadifloxacin[47]), and tertiary amines,
`such as an allylamine. However, a recent systematic review
`showed that combination products containing benzoyl per-
`oxide were only incrementally better than benzoyl peroxide
`alone.[48]
`
`2.4 Azelaic Acid
`
`Azelaic acid has both antimicrobial and anticomedonal prop-
`erties. The data on azelaic acid (15% or 20%) show an inferior
`efficacy compared with benzoyl peroxide[49,50] in reducing non-
`inflammatory lesions but a similar efficacy in reducing inflam-
`matory lesions.[49,50] There are very little data comparing the
`efficacy of adapalene, topical isotretinoin, or topical antibiotics
`with azelaic acid. Azelaic acid shows a trend towards a better
`tolerability/safety profile compared with benzoyl peroxide
`(5%),[49] topical adapalene,[50] and tretinoin.[51]
`
`2.5 Topical Dapsone
`
`Topical dapsone 5% gel offers documented efficacy for the
`reduction of both inflammatory and non-inflammatory acne
`lesions. Topical dapsone is superior to placebo but has yet to be
`compared with standard topical treatments. It has been proven
`safe, presenting none of the hematologic risks associated with
`oral dapsone. With regard to safety, the studies demonstrated
`that the concentrations of dapsone and N-acetyl dapsone re-
`main low and do not accumulate over time once steady state is
`reached. Topical dapsone 5% gel also appears to be safe to use in
`patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency.[52]
`Data suggest the vehicle formulation enhances healing and
`contributes to tolerability, making topical dapsone 5% gel a
`worthwhile anti-inflammatory treatment for patients with
`mild-to-moderate acne.[53,54]
`
`2.6 Taurine Bromamine
`
`Taurine bromamine, the product of taurine and hypobro-
`mous acid, exerts anti-inflammatory and antibacterial properties
`against P. acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis. In a double-
`blind investigation, the efficacy and safety of 3.5 mM taurine
`bromamine cream versus clindamycin gel were comparable.[55]
`These data suggest that taurine bromamine can be used as a
`topical agent in the treatment of acne, especially in patients who
`have already developed antibiotic resistance, but needs to be
`confirmed by further studies.
`
`Adis ª 2012 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved.
`
`Am J Clin Dermatol 2012; 13 (6)
`
`4 of 8
`
`

`

`Newer Approaches to Acne
`
`361
`
`2.7 Chemical Peels
`
`The most common chemicals used include a-hydroxy acids
`such as glycolic acid and b-hydroxy acids such as salicylic
`acids.[1,56] In vitro data demonstrate that glycolic acid has mod-
`erate growth inhibitory and bactericidal effects on P. acnes.[57]
`Search of the literature revealed very few clinical trials of peels
`in acne;[56] a majority of these trials included small numbers of
`patients, were not controlled, and were open label. The evi-
`dence that is available does support the use of chemical peels in
`acne as all trials had generally favorable results despite differ-
`ences in assessments, treatment regimens, and patient pop-
`ulations. Notably, no studies of chemical peels have used an
`acne medication as a comparator.[56]
`
`2.8 Other Topical Therapies
`
`Salicylic acid is an exfoliant and is a component of many
`over-the-counter preparations. No studies support routine use
`of salicylic acid in preference to other topical therapies. Some
`data suggest that the addition of salicylic acid to other topical
`therapies (i.e. clindamycin plus benzoyl peroxide) may improve
`the clinical outcome.[58]
`An over-the-counter emollient foam, containing sodium
`sulfacetaminde 10% and sulfur 5% exhibiting moisturization
`properties as well as antibacterial activities against P. acnes
`in vitro has been shown to be effective in a limited series of
`patients with acne.[59] Further studies are obviously required to
`assess its usefulness.
`Recently, a single-blind, vehicle-controlled, pilot study
`showed positive results for resveratrol on acneic skin. Resver-
`atrol
`is a natural phytoalexin exhibiting activity against
`P. acnes as well as anti-inflammatory properties and is produced
`by some spermatophytes, such as grapes and other plants.[60]
`
`2.9 Oral Contraceptives
`
`All types of combined oral contraceptives seem to be effec-
`tive in reducing inflammatory and non-inflammatory acne le-
`sions, but there is no clear evidence that those containing ad-
`ditional cyproterone offered any further benefit.[61] Although
`there are few studies comparing combined oral contraceptives
`with other acne treatments, hormonal therapy is regarded as an
`excellent choice for women who need oral contraception.[9,61,62]
`However, dermatologists have historically been reluctant to
`prescribe oral contraceptives for acne because of long-standing
`recommendations requiring a preliminary pelvic examination
`and Papanicolaou smear before initiation of therapy. In recent
`
`guideline shifts, expert panels and major health organizations
`have reached a consensus that oral contraceptive provision no
`longer necessitates the performance of a pelvic examination and
`Papanicolaou smear.[63] Another Cochrane review failed to
`show any benefit of spironolactone for acne, based on limited
`studies.[64]
`
`2.10 Optical Treatments (Laser Therapy, Light Sources, and
`Photodynamic Therapy)
`
`Optical therapies that have been used to treat acne include
`broad-spectrum continuous-wave visible light (blue and red),
`intense pulsed light, pulsed dye lasers, potassium titanyl phos-
`phate lasers, photodynamic therapy (PDT), and pulsed diode
`laser.
`Light therapy is based on the observation that P. acnes is
`capable of synthesizing chromophores such as porphyrins.[65]
`Whereas blue light has been shown to photoinactivate P. acnes,
`it does not penetrate skin very far. On the other hand, red light,
`which is less effective at porphyrin activation, can reach deeper
`sebaceous glands.[66] Compared with light therapy, lasers have
`the ability to concentrate coherent light on a smaller area of
`tissue. Although there are some studies of the treatment of non-
`inflammatory lesions with laser and light sources, the published
`evidence is still very scarce. There is conflicting evidence regard-
`ing the efficacy of red light against inflammatory lesions com-
`pared with placebo. Blue light has superior efficacy against
`inflammatory lesions/total lesions compared with placebo.[67,68]
`The combination of blue-red light therapy may act synergistically
`and be more effective at reducing the number of inflammatory
`lesions.[67] There is insufficient evidence regarding the efficacy of
`all other light and laser interventions compared with placebo.[69]
`PDT refers to the use of aminolevulinic acid, methyl-
`aminolevulinic acid, or other photosensitizing agents to en-
`hance the effect of subsequent light or laser therapy. Topical
`application of these molecules results in significant build-up of
`porphyrins in sebaceous glands and the efficacy of PDT in acne
`is believed to be related in part to a decrease in sebaceous gland
`activity following light activation of the photosensitizer. Most
`trials of PDT showed some benefit, which was greater with
`multiple treatments, and better for non-inflammatory acne
`lesions. However, the improvements in inflammatory acne
`lesions were not better than with topical adapalene 1% gel.[70]
`There are also some studies showing that treatment with the
`infrared 1450 nm diode laser reduces inflammatory acne lesions
`and may provide a long-term remission in acne. The presumed
`mechanism of acne improvement is through heating of the se-
`baceous gland and reduced sebaceous gland activity.[71]
`
`Adis ª 2012 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved.
`
`Am J Clin Dermatol 2012; 13 (6)
`
`5 of 8
`
`

`

`362
`
`Simonart
`
`A photopneumatic platform (IsolazÔ; Aesthera Corpo-
`ration, Pleasanton, CA, USA) combining vacuum pressure
`with a broadband light source device has also been shown to
`improve mild to moderate inflammatory and comedonal
`acne.[72,73] The vacuum suction raises target structures in the
`dermis closer to the surface of the skin prior to exposure, al-
`lowing for more efficient energy transmission.[72,73]
`The clinical development of optical therapies is also limited
`by adverse effects, including pain, erythema, edema, crusting,
`hyperpigmentation, and pustular eruptions.[69,70]
`Thus, although optical therapy may improve acne initially, a
`standardized treatment protocol, longer term outcomes, com-
`parisons with conventional acne therapies, and widespread
`clinical experience are still lacking. Accordingly, optical treat-
`ments are not included among first-line treatments,[69,70] espe-
`cially with current high costs.
`
`2.11 Complementary and Alternative Medications
`
`The use of complementary and alternative medications
`(CAMs) in acne is widespread and there is a growing public
`demand for the application of CAMs to acne.[74,75] A systematic
`review of CAMs for the treatment of acne in 2006 identified
`15 randomized controlled trials covering various approaches
`such as Aloe vera, pyridoxine, fruit-derived acids, kampo
`(Japanese herbal medicine), and ayurvedic herbal
`treat-
`ments.[76] Although mechanisms of potential benefit for some
`of the CAMs were biologically plausible, the included studies
`were generally of poor methodologic quality and inconclusive.
`Analogously, a systematic review of botanical products for
`acne failed to provide any good-quality evidence of bene-
`fit.[74,77] There is no controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of
`homeopathic remedies in acne.[75]
`
`2.12 Nutrition
`
`quired to determine if dietary modification will reduce long-
`term acne burden.
`
`2.13 Promising Therapies
`
`In the more distant future, vaccination with killed P. acnes
`and sialidase-based vaccines may lead to novel avenues of im-
`munologic intervention.[2,83]
`Over the past years, natural antimicrobial peptides have
`attracted considerable interest as a new type of antimicrobial
`agent for several reasons, including their relative selectivity
`towards targets (microbial membranes), their rapid mechanism
`of action and, above all, the low frequency in selecting resistant
`strains. Several antimicrobial peptides including epinecidin-
`and granulysin-derived peptides, omiganan pentahydrochloride,
`and frog skin peptides have been found to exert activity against
`P. acnes.[84,85] The anti-inflammatory effects combined with
`potent antimicrobial activities and O2-production-inhibition
`activities of cathelicidin indicate its potential as a novel ther-
`apeutic option for acne.[85]
`The strong activity of lauric acid (C12 : 0) against P. acnes,
`a middle chain, free fatty acid commonly found in natural
`products, also highlights its potential as an alternative treat-
`ment option to the antibiotic therapy of acne.[86]
`
`3. Conclusions
`
`Acne continues to remain a challenge to practicing clinicians
`and dermatologists. As the pathogenesis of acne lesions is
`complex, so is the myriad of available treatments. Despite sig-
`nificant developments, oral isotretinoin remains so far the most
`effective acne medication available. Given the restrictions
`placed on the use of isotretinoin and the increase in antibiotic-
`resistant strains of P. acnes, there is a high clinical need for new
`treatments.
`
`Some level of evidence supports the association of acne and
`high glycemic loads, certain dairy products (especially milk),
`ingestion.[78,79] The apparent
`and refined sugar product
`absence of acne in native non-Westernized populations, the
`Kitavan Islanders of Papua New Guinea and the Ache´ hunter-
`gatherers of Paraguay,[80] has led to the proposal that high
`glycemic loads in a Western diet could have a role in acne,
`perhaps through hyperinsulinemia leading to increased an-
`drogens, increased insulin-like growth-factor-1, and altered
`retinoid signaling.[80-82] A randomized controlled trial showing
`that a low glycemic load diet might improve acne provides
`preliminary support for this theory.[81] Future studies are re-
`
`Acknowledgments
`
`No sources of funding were used to prepare this article. The author has
`no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this
`article.
`
`References
`1. Kim RH, Armstrong AW. Current state of acne treatment: highlighting lasers,
`photodynamic therapy, and chemical peels. Dermatol Online J 2011 Mar;
`17 (3): 2
`
`2. Williams HC, Dellavalle RP, Garner S. Acne vulgaris. Lancet 2012 Jan 28; 379
`(9813): 361-72
`
`3. Ghodsi SZ, Orawa H, Zouboulis CC. Prevalence, severity, and severity risk
`factors of acne in high school pupils: a community-based study. J Invest
`Dermatol 2009 Sep; 129 (9): 2136-41
`
`Adis ª 2012 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved.
`
`Am J Clin Dermatol 2012; 13 (6)
`
`6 of 8
`
`

`

`Newer Approaches to Acne
`
`363
`
`4. Dre´ no B. Recent data on epidemiology of acne [in French]. Ann Dermatol
`Venereol 2010 Nov; 137 Suppl. 2: S49-51
`
`5. Gonc¸alves G, Amado J, Matos M, et al. The prevalence of acne among a group
`of Portuguese medical students. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2012 Apr;
`26 (4): 514-7
`
`6. Perkins AC, Maglione J, Hillebrand GG, et al. Acne vulgaris in women:
`prevalence across the life span. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2012 Feb; 21 (2):
`223-30
`
`7. Golchai J, Khani SH, Heidarzadeh A, et al. Comparison of anxiety and de-
`pression in patients with acne vulgaris and healthy individuals. Indian
`J Dermatol 2010 Oct; 55 (4): 352-4
`
`8. Dunn LK, O’Neill JL, Feldman SR. Acne in adolescents: quality of life, self-
`esteem, mood, and psychological disorders. Dermatol Online J 2011 Jan 15;
`17 (1): 1
`
`9. Gollnick H, Cunliffe W, Berson D, et al., Global Alliance to Improve Outcomes in
`Acne. Management of acne: a report from a Global Alliance to Improve Out-
`comes in Acne. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003 Jul; 49 (1 Suppl.): S1-37
`
`10. Strauss JS, Krowchuk DP, Leyden JJ, et al. Guidelines of care for acne vulgaris
`management. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007 Apr; 56 (4): 651-63
`
`11. Dre´ no B, Bettoli V, Ochsendorf F, et al. European recommendations on the use
`of oral antibiotics for acne. Eur J Dermatol 2004 Nov-Dec; 14 (6): 391-9
`
`12. Nast A, Bayerl C, Borelli C, et al. S2k-guideline for therapy of acne [in
`German]. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2010 Jul; 8 Suppl. 2: s1-59
`
`13. Thielitz A, Gollnick H. Topical retinoids in acne vulgaris: update on efficacy
`and safety. Am J Clin Dermatol 2008; 9 (6): 369-81
`
`14. Yentzer BA, McClain RW, Feldman SR. Do topical retinoids cause acne to
`‘‘flare’’? J Drugs Dermatol 2009 Sep; 8 (9): 799-801
`
`15. Gollnick HP, Finlay AY, Shear N. Can we define acne as a chronic disease?
`If so, how and when? Am J Clin Dermatol 2008; 9 (5): 279-84
`
`16. Cunliffe WJ, Poncet M, Loesche C, et al. A comparison of the efficacy and
`tolerability of adapalene 0.1% gel versus tretinoin 0.025% gel in patients with
`acne vulgaris: a meta-analysis of five randomized trials. Br J Dermatol 1998
`Oct; 139 Suppl. 52: 48-56
`17. Eichenfield LF, Wortzman M. A novel gel formulation of 0.25% tretinoin and
`1.2% clindamycin phosphate: efficacy in acne vulgaris patients aged 12 to
`18 years. Pediatr Dermatol 2009 May-Jun; 26 (3): 257-61
`
`18. Webster GF. Evidence-based review: fixed-combination therapy and topical
`retinoids in the treatment of acne. J Drugs Dermatol 2011 Jun; 10 (6): 636-44
`
`19. Eichenfield LF, Alio´ Sa´ enz AB. Safety and efficacy of clindamycin phosphate
`1.2%-benzoyl peroxide 3% fixed-dose combination gel for the treatment of
`acn

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket