throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03167.x
`
`JEADV
`
`
`
`
`
`REVIEW ARTICLE
`Current topical and systemic approaches to treatment of rosacea
`
`HC Korting,* C Schöllmann
`
`Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
` HC Korting.
` h.c.korting@lrz.uni-muenchen.de
`*Correspondence:
`E-mail:
`
`Abstract
`Rosacea is a common, often overlooked, chronic facial dermatosis characterized by intermittent periods of exacerbation
`and remission. Clinical subtypes and grading of the disease have been defined in the literature. On the basis of a genetic
`predisposition, there are several intrinsic and extrinsic factors possibly correlating with the phenotypic expression of the
`disease. Although rosacea cannot be cured, there are several recommended treatment strategies appropriate to control
`the corresponding symptoms/signs. In addition to adequate skin care, these include topical and systemic medications
`particularly suitable for the papulopustular subtype of rosacea with moderate to severe intensity. The most commonly
`used and most established therapeutic regimens are topical metronidazole and topical azelaic acid as well as oral
`doxycycline. Conventionally, 100–200 mg per day have been used. Today also a controlled release formulation is
`available, delivering 40 mg per day using non-antibiotic, anti-inflammatory activities of the drug. Anti-inflammatory dose
`doxycycline in particular allows for a safe and effective short- and long-term therapy of rosacea. Topical metronidazole
`and topical azelaic acid also appear to be safe and effective for short-term use. There are indications that a combined
`therapy of anti-inflammatory dose doxycycline and topical metronidazole could possibly have synergy effects. Further
`interesting therapy options for the short- and long-term therapy of rosacea could be low-dose minocycline and
`isotretinoin; however, too little data are available with regard to the effectiveness, safety, optimal dosage and appropriate
`length of treatment for these medications to draw final conclusions.
`Received: 21 December 2007; Accepted 9 December 2008
`
`Keywords
`azelaic acid, doxycycline, metronidazole, rosacea
`
`Conflicts of interest
`.
`None declared
`
`Introduction
`Rosacea is a common, but often overlooked, chronic cutaneous
`disease of uncertain aetiology with many different clinical
`manifestations.
` The dermatological condition primarily affects
`1
`the centre of the face, especially the cheeks, nose, chin and central
`forehead. Furthermore, ocular manifestations may be present,
`possibly occurring more frequently than previously presumed.
`2
`The earliest and not rarely predominant complaints linked to
`rosacea are intermittent, central facial flushing and erythema.
`Many patients complain of a stinging pain associated with
`episodes of flushing while itching is nearly always absent.
`Flushing episodes can occur unpredictably or can be linked to
`environmental, chemical, food or emotional triggers (i.e.
`exposure to sun, cold weather, hot beverages, sudden emotion
`like laughter or embarrassment and alcohol consumption).
` The
`1
`progression of rosacea is variable; however, typical stages are
`represented by papules and pustules and, finally, rhinophyma.
`
`Epidemiology
`Conventional wisdom has it that rosacea is more common in
`women,
` while the clinical manifestations of the disease are
`3
`more severe in men.
` By contrast, a recent analysis based on a
`4
`cross sectional study of rosacea (1995 2002) on 50 235 outpatients
`shows that overall, both sexes were equally affected by the disease.
`5
`Epidemiological data at large suggest that there is a genetic
`predisposition for this disease, with several intrinsic and extrinsic
`factors potentially correlating with the phenotypic expression of
`rosacea.
`6
`Rosacea most frequently occurs in the light skinned Caucasian
`population, and in persons between 30 and 50 years.
` Estimates
`1,3,7
`of the prevalence of rosacea range from less than 1% to 10%.
` A
`4,5,8
`recent investigation suggests that the prevalence of rosacea has
`been substantially underestimated. Among 850 females aged up to
`70 years recruited from the general population in London and Los
`Angeles, 174 (20.5%) were identified as having rosacea, with
`
`JEADV
` 2009,
`23
`
`, 876–882
`
`Journal compilation © 2009
`
`© 2009 The Authors
`
`1 of 7
`
`Almirall EXHIBIT 2024
`
`Amneal v. Almirall
`IPR2019-00207
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Approaches to treatment of rosacea
`
`877
`
` In
`rosacea prevalence decreasing with the degree of skin colour.
`9
`contrast, data collected by the Rochester Epidemiology Project
`indicate a rosacea prevalence of 2.1% among adults, suggesting
`that the actual occurrence of the disease is rarer than previously
`reported.
`
`Pathophysiology
`There is a lack of understanding with regard to the pathogenesis
`of rosacea. The important issue of whether or not the papules are
`based in the follicle is still unclear at this time.
` It is also unknown
`10
`if accumulated sun damage might be involved in the pathogenesis,
`and, furthermore, whether neurological and hormonal mechanisms
`are involved in flushing reaction and phyma formation and, if so,
`which ones (for review, see Baldwin
`). What is known is that the
`10
`pathophysiology of rosacea likely is inflammatory, and that most
`interventions appear to modulate the inflammatory process.
`11,12
`Moreover, there is a growing consensus that bacterial infection
`most likely is not involved in rosacea pathogenesis.
` Because of
`10
`the poor understanding of the pathogenesis of rosacea, treatment
`has generally targeted the symptoms/signs rather than the
`potential underlying causes of the disease. Despite the incomplete
`understanding of the pathogenesis of rosacea, therapeutic options
`
`continue to expand (for review, see Pelle et al.
`).
`13
`
`Classification and staging
`A standard classification system for rosacea was published in
`April 2002.
` Developed by the National Rosacea Society Expert
`14
`Committee on the Classification and Staging of Rosacea and
`reviewed by rosacea experts worldwide, it describes primary and
`secondary features of the disease. Primary features were identified
`as flushing (transient erythema), nontransient erythema, papules
`and pustules and telangiectasia. Secondary features were identified
`as burning or stinging, presence of plaques, dry appearance,
`presence of oedema, peripheral location (extrafacial signs and
`symptoms) and phymatous changes.
` Finally, the committee
`14
`recognized four patterns of signs and symptoms, designated as
`subtypes.
`Subtype 1 (erythematotelangiectatic rosacea) is characterized
`by flushing and persistent central facial erythema with tel
`angiectases common but not essential. Subtype 2 (papulopustular
`rosacea) includes persistent central facial erythema with transient
`papules, pustules, or both in a central facial distribution. Burning
`and stinging may also occur. Subtype 3 (phymatous rosacea) may
`include thickening of the skin, irregular surface nodularity, and
`enlargement (e.g. as rhinophyma). Patulous, expressive follicles
`may appear in the phymatous area, and telangiectases may be
`present as well. Subtype 4 (ocular rosacea) may be characterized
`by a watery or bloodshot appearance, foreign body sensation,
`burning or stinging, dryness, itching, light sensitivity, blurred
`vision and telangiectasia of the conjunctiva and lid margin; lid and
`periocular erythema, blepharitis, conjunctivitis and irregularity of
`the eyelid may also be present. Using the National Rosacea Society
`
`Expert Committee’s standard classification system, among 177
`women with rosacea recruited from the general population in
`London and Los Angeles recently (as cited above
`), 161 (92.6%)
`14
`were considered to have subtype 1 while only 13 (7.4%) had
`the papulopustular subtype 2. Fourteen women (8%) had ocular
`involvement and seven (4%) rhinophyma.
`9
`To enhance the utility of the classification system, the Committee
`devised a standard method for assessing different grades of
`severity.
` As indicated in the proposals of the Committee, primary
`15
`signs may be graded as absent, mild, moderate or severe (0 3), and
`most secondary features may be graded simply as absent or
`present.
` According to the researchers, such a standard grading
`15
`system in combination with a standard classification system is
`often useful and essential in analysing results from different
`sources and performing research. In turn, standard parameters
`and terminology may provide a common reference for the
`diagnosis, treatment and estimation of results in clinical practice.
`The recent study among 177 women with rosacea already
`addressed above suggests that mild disease is more common in
`females with subtype 1, affecting almost 75% of those individuals,
`while the skin disease severity was graded as moderate in 19% of
`the women with subtype 1 and severe in 9%.
`9
`Classification of the polymorphic disease rosacea into four
`subtypes is also controversial among some researchers. For example,
`Albert M. Kligman believes that reducing the disease to four main
`types is a vast oversimplification and does little to clarify the
`complexities of this entity.
` For Kligman and other researchers,
`4
`rosacea fundamentally is a vascular disorder beginning with
`episodes of flushing and histopathologically showing classic signs
`of damage to the dermal matrix; namely, elastosis, collagenolysis
`and increased glycaminoglycans.
`4
`
`Therapy of rosacea
`
`Therapy based on rosacea subtypes
`Although rosacea is a disease that causes high psychological strain
`in those affected, it has no adverse effect on vital functions. For
`this reason, preference should be made for medications with an
`especially favourable risk profile.
`The four subtypes differ greatly with regard to their response to
`various therapy strategies. The erythematotelangiectatic subtype
`is the most difficult to treat. Most patients respond poorly to
`topical or oral medications. There are some data indicating that
`isotretinoin transiently may improve erythema resulting from
`inflammation, while medications that antagonize flushing may be
`helpful for other patients.
` Vascular laser and light therapy have
`10
`been increasingly utilized for control of the generalized erythema,
`flushing, and telangiectasia characteristic for this subtype of
`rosacea.
` Mild forms of ocular rosacea respond readily to topical
`16,17
`medications and eyelid hygiene; more severe forms substantially
`respond to oral antibiotics, with tetracyclines being used most
`often.
` There is a limit to the use of topical and/or oral medications
`10
`
`JEADV
` 2009,
`, 876–882
`23
`
`© 2009 The Authors
`Journal compilation © 2009 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
`
`2 of 7
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`878
`
`Korting and Schöllmann
`
`in the treatment of phymatous rosacea. Often surgery or laser
`ablation is necessary to eradicate very pronounced lesions.
`10
`Isotretinoin, in particular, has been shown to have the potential to
`
`et al., as cited in
`delay the progression of rhinophyma (Irvine
`Baldwin
`) and to be an option for patients with treatment resistant
`10
`rosacea.
` The papulopustular subtype of rosacea is the easiest type
`18
`to treat. A lot of patients respond well to topical medications such
`as metronidazole, azelaic acid, benzoyl peroxide, clindamycin,
`and erythromycin.
` Sometimes, however, topical medications
`10
`reach the limitations of their effectiveness. At this point at the
`latest, a systemic therapy is necessary. Since 2006, topical
`medications are no longer being applied as a first line therapy
`in the USA in all cases. With the advent of a once daily, non
`antibiotic dosing of doxycycline as a therapy option, the systemic
`approach is being used more often as a first choice medication.
`6
`In addition, recent studies suggest that a combined therapy
`(e.g. once daily, anti inflammatory doxycycline combined
`with topical metronidazole) might possibly further increase
`effectiveness
`.
`19,20
`The therapy options discussed in detail in the following primarily
`address the problems of patients with the moderate to severe
`papulopustular subtype.
`
`Topical medications
`Three topical medications have been approved by the US Food
`and Drug Administration (FDA) for rosacea, and all three,
`including 0.75% and 1% metronidazole, 10% sodium with 5%
`sulphur, and 15% azelaic acid, are indicated for the management
`of papules, pustules and erythema.
` Moreover, other medications
`13
`are used off label for this disease.
`
`Metronidazole
`In the 1980s, it was shown for the first time that topical
`metronidazole can be used successfully in the treatment of
` Today, besides azelaic acid (see below), metronidazole
`rosacea.
`21
`is considered the first choice for the topical therapy of rosacea.
`Twice daily metronidazole (0.75%) was well tolerated and effective
`in the treatment of 582 patients with mild to moderately severe
`papulopustular rosacea of various aetiologies and locations. Its
`mean erythema severity score decreased significantly and was
`reduced by nearly 50% by week 12.
` For a long time, a twice daily
`22
`application of 0.75% gel formulation was considered to be the
`optimal dosage until the effectiveness of a once daily dosage of
`0.75% and 1% metronidazole formulation could be shown in a
`12 week, randomized study.
` In 2006, it was moreover shown
`23
`that the type of formulation in fact might play a subordinate role
`with regard to effectiveness: metronidazole cream, gel and lotion
`have been shown to have similar efficacy, regardless of whether
`a concentration of 0.75% or 1% is chosen or a once daily or
`twice daily regimen.
`24
`The efficacy of topical metronidazole vs. a placebo has been
`demonstrated in various trials; however, only nine of these were of
`
`acceptable quality. In these studies, metronidazole was found to
`be an effective medication with few adverse effects, whereby most
`of the adverse effects were mild, including pruritus, skin irritation
`et al.
`and dry skin (see Van Zuuren
`). A new, stable aqueous
`25
`metronidazole gel (1%) might possibly even be a better tolerated
`alternative with a low potential for causing sensitization reactions
`and no evidence for causing phototoxic or photo allergic reactions.
`26
`In patient self assessment, there was no statistical difference
`between topical azelaic acid and topical metronidazole, whereas a
`significantly higher physician rating of global approvement was
`achieved with azelaic acid.
` However, the difference between
`27,28
`the two medications with regard to the reduction of inflammatory
`lesions was too marginal to be of clinical relevance.
` A new
`28
`study shows that the efficacy of the once daily application of
`metronidazole (1% gel) and twice daily azelaic acid 15% gel was
`similar.
` Both medications were well tolerated, but the number of
`29
`adverse effects was lower after application of metronidazole
`whereby the adverse effects in both groups have been reported be
`mild to moderate.
` Furthermore, topical metronidazole might
`28
`be as effective as oral tetracycline,
` benzoyl peroxide 5%/eryth
`21,30
`romycin 3% gel,
` and topical permethrin (5% cream),
` but more
`31
`32
`evidence is needed.
`
`Sodium sulphacetamide and sulphur
`For more than 50 years, sodium sulphacetamide 10% with sulphur
`5% has provided a safe, well tolerated and effective option for
`the treatment of rosacea,
` but the quality of studies concerning
`13
`this matter is generally poor. By means of an 8 week therapy,
`a significant reduction in inflammatory lesions (78% vs. 36%,
`P
`respectively;
`< 0001) and facial erythema (83% vs. 31%,
`P
`respectively;
`< 0001) was achieved compared to a vehicle.
`33
`Adverse effects (pruritus, contact dermatitis, irritation, and xerosis)
`occurred in 19% of users, but they were reported to be mild
`et al.
`et al.
`(Lebwohl
`, as cited in Pelle
`). Anecdotal evidence and
`13
`preliminary studies suggest at least some additional benefit
`when sodium sulphacetamide 10%/sulphur 5% is applied in
`combination with topical metronidazole.
` Moreover, newer
`34
`‘wash on wash off’ sodium sulphacetamide formulations have
`further additional benefits such as less lingering odour, lower
`irritation potential and fewer interactions with other topical
`regimens or cosmetics (Arndt and Bowers, as cited in Pelle
`et al.
`). Generally, there is insufficient evidence concerning the
`13
`effectiveness of sulphacetamide with sulphur in the treatment of
`rosacea.
`
`Azelaic acid
`Azelaic acid, mostly applied as 15% gel or 20% cream, is a
`naturally occurring saturated dicarboxylic acid
` approved for the
`35
`treatment of mild to moderate rosacea in various countries. Its
`effectiveness and safety has been demonstrated in two phase III,
`vehicle controlled, randomized trials in 664 patients with
`papulopustular rosacea. In these studies, improvement of erythema
`
`JEADV
` 2009,
`23
`
`, 876–882
`
`© 2009 The Authors
`Journal compilation © 2009 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
`
`3 of 7
`
`

`

`Approaches to treatment of rosacea
`
`879
`
`was found in 44% and 46% ofrosacea patients treated with azelaic
`acid vs. 29% and 28% of patients treated with a vehicle.36 Analysis
`of the reduction of inflammatory papules and pustules led to
`comparable results.37
`
`Benzoyl peroxide, erythromycin and clindamycin
`Benzoyl peroxide, erythromycin and clindamycin are sometimes
`used ofl' label in the treatment of rosacea although there are not
`rmny studies available covering these three medications.
`
`Tacrolimus
`
`Topieal tacrolimus (0.1 or 0.075% 96 ointment) is a macrolide
`non steroidal immunomodulatory preparation approved in the
`USA that acts by inhibiting T cell activation and cytokine release.”
`It is approved so far for the treatment ofatopic dermatitis only but
`has also been reported to be an effective treatment for steroid
`induced rosacea,”"” yet there are not many studies available in
`this regard. It has been claimed that tacrolimus twice daily
`combined with 100 mg of minocycline (twice daily) clears most
`patients with steroid induced rosacea within 1 2 months.”
`
`Tretinoin
`
`In a few small series, topieal retinoids like tretinoin have
`demonstrated benefit for rosacea. although the clinical response is
`delayed and often not evident until 2 or more months after
`initiation of therapy." ‘3 The use of topieal retinoids in rosaoea
`has often been avoided because of the possible angiogenesis
`supporting effects of this substance group, yet so far a visible
`increase in cutaneous vascularity or the development of
`telangiectasia has not been observed.‘m In contrast, a lessening
`of erythema and a partial
`to complete disappearance of
`telangiectasia has been reported in patients treated with 0.025%
`tretinoin cream" However, on the whole, the trial situation for
`
`this medieation is relatively poor.
`
`Oral medications
`Oral antibiotics have been used 0E label for the treatment of
`
`rosacea for more than 50 years, and tetracyclines have been the
`drug class most often used. Antibiotics were used to treat rosacea
`based on the presumption (and from today’s view a presumption
`that is most likely wrong) that bacterial pathogens are, in part,
`responsible for the development of the disease.‘0
`
`Tetracyclines
`Tetracyclines are broad spectrum antibiotics that have been used
`in rosacea treatment for deeades although never approved by the
`FDA for this indieation." They were first widely prescribed by
`dermatologists in the 19503 when it was discovered that they were
`effective in the treatment of acne. Tetracycline has also been
`reported to be effective in the treatment of papulopustular
`rosacea, in which context a 3 or 4 week treatment regimen
`was required to achieve substantial improvement.“ Tetracycline
`
`
`
`Flgm 1 Chemical structure of doxycycline.
`
`(250 1000 mg per day), doxycycline (100 200 mg per day, and
`lately also 20 40 mg per day) and minocycline (100 200 mg per
`day) are the most commonly used compounds. '° Tetracyclines are
`contraindieated in pregnant women. Until recently, the use oforal
`tetracyclines for rosacea was based primarily on clinieal experience
`anda limited number ofplacebo controlled studies?“ Only the
`most recent studies were conducted on the basis of a suficiently
`large number of patients reflecting their generally high quality.6
`but nevertheless further randomized, controlled studies are
`needed.
`
`Today researchers for the most part agree that it is mainly the
`non antibiotic properties of the various tetracyclines that are
`responsible hr the eflectiveness ofthese substances in skin diseases
`such as rosacea. In fact, it is the non antibiotic actions oftetracyclines
`such as the inhibition ofangiogenesis, the inhibition ofneutrophil
`chemotaxis, the inhibition of pro inflammatory cytokines and
`the inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases that significantly
`contribute to the clinieal effectiveness for various indieations
`in
`
`addition to rosacea also being used for bullous dermatoses,
`neutrophil diseases, periodontitis and autoimmune disorders such
`as rheumatoid arthritis and sderoderma, pyoderma gangrenosum.
`sarcoidosis, aortic aneurysms, and cancer." In particular, the
`ability of tetracyclines to reduce the inflammatory response is
`believed to be the rationale for its effectiveness in treating rosacea
`(Greewald et aL, as cited in Baldwin”).
`Besides the classic drug, tetracycline itself, today second genera
`tion tetracyclines, including minocycline and especially doxycyeline
`(Fig. l), are being successfully used in the treatment of rosacea. In
`comparison with their parent drug, these tetracyclines can ofier
`advantages to the dermatologist over tetracycline. For example,
`they have an improved bioavailability, a longer elimination half life,
`and they an be taken with (bod which minimizes gastrointestinal
`side effects.“ A big advantage of these substances, moreover, is
`represented by the fact that they are helpful for rosacea patients
`already at a sub antimicrobial (also at a time anti inflammatory)
`dose.‘ Thus, an effective and tolerable long term therapy is
`possible without having to accept the disadvantages ofa long term
`antibiosis, i.e. undesired side effects such as eandidal vulvovaginitis
`or gastrointestinal distress. and of worldwide importance
`the
`propagation of bacterial resistance.‘9 As bacterial resistance is a
`
`IEADV 2009, 23. 876—882
`
`OZm9'I'heAuhora
`JounalcompiafimGZOOBEuropeanAcademyofDemtatobgyandVenereobgy
`
`40f7
`
`

`

`880
`
`Korting and Schollmann
`
`global problem, the use of non antibiotic alternatives such as
`low dose doxycycline should be preferred in the treatment of
`rosacea where there is no established evidence of a microbial
`
`pathogenesis.’o
`Anti inflammatory dose doxycycline is the only tetracycline
`approved in the USA for long term use for up to 12 months.” The
`used dosage of 20 mg doxycycline hyclate twice daily or 40 mg
`once daily has been shown to effectively treat papulopustular
`rosacea with an especially favourable risk benefit ratio. The first
`oral medication approved by the FDA for the treatment ofrosacea
`in the USA is marketed as Oracea“. Oracea' is a 40 mg capsule of
`doxycycline monohydrate containing 30 mg immediate release
`and 10 mg delayed release doxycycline beads. In contrast to other
`oral therapies, anti inflamImtory dose doxycycline is taken once
`daily, which may increase treatment compliance.” Furthermore,
`it has been shown that a 40 mg controlled release formulation of
`doxycycline conferred peak anti inflamrmtory efficacy in the
`treatment of rosacea.‘o At sub antimicrobial doses, long term use
`of anti inflammatory dose doxycycline might not exert selective
`pressure on micro organisms, and thus not lead to the development
`of antibiotic resistant organisms'w'“. Recently, two phase III,
`parallel group, multicentre, randomized, double blind, placebo
`controlled studies have demonstrated the eflieacy and safety of a
`16 week treatment with anti inflammatory doxycycline (40 mg)
`administered once daily in patients with rosacea.‘ Both studies
`included patients with a marked number ofinflammatory lesions
`(10 40 papules, < 2 nodules), moderate to severe erythema and
`the presence of telangiectasia. Patients received 40 mg ofcontrolled
`release doxycycline (n = 269) or placebo (n = 268) for 16 weeks.
`The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in
`inflammatory lesion count. At week 16, the mean change from
`baseline in lesion count in the doxycycline groups was
`11.8 in
`one study and 9.5 in the other study compared with 5.9 and 4.3,
`respectively, in the placebo groups (P < 0.001 for both comparisons,
`Figs 2 and 3). The active medication was well tolerated with
`nasopharyngitis (4.8%), diarrhoea (4.4%) and headaches (4.4%)
`constituting the most common adverse efiects being found only
`marginally more frequently than in the control group, if at all.‘
`Thus, today anti inflammatory doxycycline (40 mg) administered
`once daily must be considered to be
`besides topical therapies
`with metronidazole or azelaic acid a promising therapy strategy
`for rosacea of papulopustular subtype.
`Current research on comparably small patient numbers suggests
`that a combined therapy of anti inflammatory dose doxycycline
`and topical metronidazole (0.75% topieal lotion or 1% topical gel)
`leads to an especially effective alleviation of inflammatory lesions.
`The therapeutic effect might be greater and set in faster than with
`metronidazole alone" (Fowler, 2007, poster presented at: American
`Academy of Dermatology 65th Annual Meeting; February 2 6,
`2007; Washington, DC). Yet reliable data are not available as to
`whether the efiectiveness ofthe combination is better than that of
`
`anti inflammatory dose doxycycline alone.
`
`
`=o.oos 'P<0.001' P<o.oo1I P<0.001
`
`
`
`count
`
`inflammatorylesion
`
` MeanchangeIntotal
`
`Baseline
`
`Week 3
`
`+ Doxycycline
`
`Week 6
`+
`
`Week 12
`Placebo
`
`Week 16
`
`Figue 2 Mean change from baseline in total inflammatory lesion
`count (papules + pustules + nodulee)ihrough week 16 in study 301
`(from Del Roeeo et al.‘ with permission).
`
`P< 0.001
`
`P< 0.001
`
`P< 0.001
`
`—2
`
`\= 0.005
`
`
`count I
`
`inflammatoryIeslon
`
` MeanchangeIntotal
`
`_| 0
`
`Baseline
`
`Week 3
`
`Week 6 Week 12 Week 16
`
`+ Doxycycllne + Placebo
`
`Figue 3 Mean change from baseline in total inflammatory lesion
`count (papules + pustules + nodulee)through week 16in study 302
`(From Del Rosso at al.5with permission).
`
`Macrolides
`
`Although oral erythromycin at a dose of 250 1000 mg per day is
`considered an effective drug for the treatment of papulopustular
`rosacea,
`it is not often used because of the gastrointestinal
`side effects it frequently causes.” As a general rule, the use of
`erythromycin is reserved for those patients that are intolerant,
`allergic or refractory to tetracyclines or in eases where tetracyclines
`are contraindieated, such as in pregnancy.'3
`As second generation macrolides. clarithromycin and azi
`thromycin take effect faster and are better tolerated with regard to
`gastrointestinal side eflects than orally administered tetracyclines,
`metronidazole and ketoconazole.52 In several smaller studies, both
`
`have been found to be eEective and tolerable drugs in the short
`term therapy of rosacea.52 5‘ After a 12 week treatment with
`azithromycin in decreasing doses, there was a 75% decrease in
`total scores and an 89% decrease in inflammatory lesion scores
`
`IEADV 2009. 23. 876—882
`
`0 2039 The Authors
`Journd compilation 0 2009 Euopean Mademy of DermatologyandVenereology
`
`50f7
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Approaches to treatment of rosacea
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`881
`
`54
`
` According to a trial with a 3 year
`compared with basal values.
`follow up, rosacea patients that were treated with clarithromycin
`required a significantly shorter treatment period (10.2 weeks) than
`patients who received an antibiotic effective dose (200 mg per
`day) of doxycycline.
` Controlled clinical trials are necessary to
`52
`further elucidate the role of second generation macrolides in both
`short term and, in particular, long term therapy for rosacea.
`
`Isotretinoin
`Isotretinoin is one of the few drugs which elicit a response with
` but the quality of studies concerning
`several subtypes of rosacea,
`10
`this matter is generally very poor. Only small trials of low quality
`are available, whether randomized nor blinded, whose results
`have to be interpreted very carefully. In one of these small studies,
`isotretinoin was effective for both erythematotelangiectatic and
`papulopustular rosacea, including a reduced facial cutaneous
`blood flow in the isotretinoin group but not in the comparison
`et al.
`, as cited in
`group treated with oxytetracycline (Irvine
`Baldwin
`). Another study on 22 patients shows the effectiveness
`10
`of a 4 month low dose isotretinoin therapy (10 mg per day) in
`patients with therapy resistant rosacea. The treatment led to a
`reduction of inflammatory lesions, erythema and telangiectasia.
`19
`Overall the effect of isotretinoin therapy was delayed in
`comparison to therapy with oral antibiotics.
`18,55
`
`Metronidazole
`Oral metronidazole was reported to be successful in the treatment
`of rosacea for the first time in 1976. A 6 week therapy with twice
`daily 200 mg oral metronidazole significantly reduced papules
`and pustules in 29 patients.
` A randomized study investigated the
`56
`effectiveness of oral metronidazole (200 mg twice daily) or
`oxytetracycline (250 mg twice daily). Both drugs produced an
`improvement after 6 and especially after 12 weeks of therapy, but
`there was no significant difference between them.
` In rare cases,
`57
`treatment with oral metronidazole might be associated with
`epileptiform seizures, encephalopathy, and sensory neuropathy.
`58
`It requires abstinence from alcohol.
`57
`Besides the drugs described, the literature mentions drugs that
`improve flushing reactions in particular cases. These include, for
`example, propanolol, clonidine, nadolol, naloxone, ondansetron,
`acetyl salicylic acid, and some selective serotonin reuptake inhib
`itors.10 However, there is insufficient evidence for the effectiveness
`of these substances.
`
`Conclusions
`An array of topical and systemic therapy options exist for the
`therapy of rosacea, especially for the papulopustular subtype.
`Many of these options have already existed for decades. However,
`sufficient evidence with regard to effectiveness and tolerability
`only exists for a few of the active pharmacological ingredients and
`treatments used. According to data currently available, topical
`metronidazole and azelaic acid can be regarded as essentially safe.
`
`Both allow for a safe and effective short term treatment of
`papulopustular rosacea, whereby azelaic acid has a slight
`advantage with regard to efficacy, and metronidazole with regard
`to tolerability. Among systemic drugs, low dose non antibiotic
`doxycycline, especially with the once daily application approach,
`is the most interesting and, based on recent studies, the best
`supported therapy option. Fortunately, it can also be used as a
`therapy on a long term basis. Currently, no criteria exist for
`determining under which conditions preference should be made
`for topical or systemic therapy strategies. Since 2006, that is, since
`once daily, non antibiotic dose doxycycline is available in the
`USA, there seems to be a trend to move towards using the systemic
`therapy with doxycycline as first line monotherapy and not to
`reserve it for those patients only who did not experience success
`with topical therapy. Further studies must show whether
`combination therapies (e.g. with oral non antibiotic dose
`doxycycline and topical metronidazole) lead to a further increase
`in efficacy in rosacea
` what should indeed meet the expectations
`of at least a remarkable subgroup of bothered patients.
`
`References
`1 Blount BW, Pelletier AP. Rosacea: a common yet commonly overlooked
`condition. Am Fam Physician 2002; 66: 435–440, 442.
`2 Eiseman AS. The ocular manifestations of atopic dermatitis and rosacea.
`Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2006; 6: 292–298.
`3 Berg M, Liden S. An epidemiological study of rosacea. Acta Derm Venereol
`1989; 69: 419–423.
`4 Kligman AM. A personal critique on the state of knowledge of rosacea.
`Dermatology 2004, 2008: 191–198.
`5 Kyriakis KP, Palamaras I, Terzoudi S, Emmanuelides S, Michailides C,
`Pagana G. Epidemiologic aspects of rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 53:
`918–919.
`6 Del Rosso JQ, Webster GF, Kackson M et al. Two randomized phase III
`clinical trials evaluating anti-inflammatory dose doxycycline (40-mg
`doxycycline, USP capsules) administered once daily for treatment of
`rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 56: 791–802.
`7 Fel

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket