throbber
REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
`
`VOLUME 71, NUMBER 4
`
`APRIL 2000
`
`A sample-scanning confocal optical microscope for cryogenic operation
`J.-M. Segura,a) A. Renn, and B. Hechtb)
`Physical Chemistry Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH-Zentrum, CH-8092 Zu¨rich,
`Switzerland
`~Received 20 September 1999; accepted for publication 9 December 1999!
`
`A sample-scanning confocal optical microscope for single-molecule imaging and spectroscopy
`working at superfluid helium temperature, liquid nitrogen, and room temperature is described. An
`optical resolution of 800 nm full width at half maximum as well as a detection efficiency of ’3.5%
`are achieved. The sample scanner features an exceptionally large scan range of 23 mm at 1.8 K. A
`position sensor allows for continuous observation of the scanner motion and for a correction of
`piezoelectric hysteresis and creep at 77 K and at room temperature. Coarse positioning of the sample
`in x-y is achieved by an inertia drive with high reproducibility and nanometer precision. We
`demonstrate combined high–resolution confocal imaging and spectroscopy of single molecules at
`1.8 K. © 2000 American Institute of Physics. @S0034-6748~00!00704-8#
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`
`Optical detection and spectroscopy of single molecules
`recently generated considerable interest in many fields of
`research.1,2 Experiments with single chromophores circum-
`vent
`the averaging effect
`inherent
`in conventional spec-
`troscopies. In contrast to mean values, distributions of pa-
`rameters can be accessed. Single molecules have also been
`used as ultimate local probes or markers to study changes in
`their local environments or to trace dynamics of labeled en-
`tities.
`At superfluid helium temperature, spectroscopic infor-
`mation greatly enhances the sensitivity of single-molecule
`experiments.3,4 At 1.8 K the absorption line of certain types
`of impurity molecules in solid matrices, the zero phonon line
`~ZPL!, becomes extremely narrow ~some tens of megahertz!.
`Due to inhomogeneities in the solid these ZPLs are spectrally
`distributed over a range of several gigahertz in frequency and
`can thus be selectively excited by a narrow-band laser. The
`sharpness of the ZPL and its resulting high sensitivity to-
`wards external perturbations combined with a strong en-
`hancement of the photostability represent the main motiva-
`tions for performing single-molecule experiments at
`low
`temperature. Spectral dynamics and line broadening of the
`ZPL can provide detailed information on the immediate na-
`noenvironment. This opens the possibility for many experi-
`ments with single molecules that would not be possible at
`room temperature.
`low-temperature experiments,3,4 only
`In the classical
`spectral separation is used to isolate single molecules thereby
`losing all information about spatial positions. To address this
`problem, wide-field optical microscopy techniques5–7 have
`been introduced, which are capable of imaging the spatial
`positions of large numbers of single molecules distributed
`over large sample areas. While such experiments offer the
`great advantage of studying the properties of many mol-
`
`a!Electronic mail: segura@phys.chem.ethz.ch
`b!Electronic mail: hecht@phys.chem.ethz.ch
`
`0034-6748/2000/71(4)/1706/6/$17.00
`
`1706
`
`ecules in parallel, it would sometimes be more desirable to
`use scanning confocal optical microscopy ~SCOM!8,9 to spa-
`tially isolate a single molecule and correlate position with
`spectral and temporal behavior. SCOM provides diffraction-
`limited three-dimensional optical resolution and high back-
`ground rejection. It has been successfully applied for imag-
`ing and spectroscopy of
`single molecules
`at
`room
`temperature.2
`SCOM can be combined with other scanning probe tech-
`niques like scanning near-field optical microscopy ~SNOM!
`and atomic force microscopy ~AFM!. This would open the
`way to a new class of quantum optical experiments that re-
`quire single molecules to be precisely positioned relative to
`nanostructures.10,11 We envisage studying quantitatively the
`interaction of single molecules with sharply pointed nano-
`structures such as tips of scanning probe microscopes, in
`order to develop new high-resolution optical microscopies
`based on high-resolution spectroscopy.
`We have designed and realized a SCOM working at
`1.8 K with a sample scan range of 23 mm. Such a large scan
`range is a necessary condition for successful operation of the
`microscope because the field of view has to be reasonably
`large in relation to the optical resolution which is ’800 nm
`in the current setup. The sample scanning design has been
`chosen as opposed to a beam scanning configuration12 in
`order to maintain compatibility to a future scanning probe
`microscope extension. Unlike scanning tunneling micros-
`copy, AFM, or SNOM,13–15 where low-temperature designs
`have already been published, no sample scanning SCOM
`having a scan range of more than a few microns can be found
`in the literature.16,17 The main reason is the difficulty to de-
`sign a scanner based on piezoelectric materials which has the
`desired properties.
`We present single-molecule images and frequency scans
`at selected positions recorded at superfluid helium tempera-
`ture in order to demonstrate the capabilities of the instru-
`ment.
`3SHAPE EXHIBIT 1128
`© 2000 American Institute of Physics
`3Shape v. Align
`IPR2019-00157
`
`

`

`Rev. Sci. Instrum., Vol. 71, No. 4, April 2000
`
`Confocal optical microscope
`
`1707
`
`FIG. 1. Scheme of the optical path and
`elements involved in the SCOM: ~L!
`laser system, ~W! wave meter, and
`spectral analyzer, ~P! power stabilizer,
`~SP! spatial filter, ~FL! flippable lens,
`~H! holographic notch filter, ~C! cry-
`ostat, ~MO! microscope objective, ~S!
`sample, ~F! cutoff filter and notch fil-
`ter for 830 nm, ~FM! flippable mirror,
`~O! ocular,
`~SPAD!
`single-photon
`counting avalanche photo diode.
`
`II. INSTRUMENTATION
`
`A. Optical setup
`
`The optical setup is similar to what is used in a room-
`temperature SCOM. However, some particularities of low-
`temperature single-molecule spectroscopy have to be taken
`into account. The optical path is sketched in Fig. 1. The
`excitation light is provided by a single-mode tunable con-
`tinuous wave ~cw! ring dye laser ~Coherent, 699! pumped by
`a cw Ar1-ion laser ~Spectra Physics, Model 2045!. The use
`of a tunable narrow-band laser (Dn51 MHz! is essential in
`order to perform spectroscopy of the narrow ZPL of the
`single molecules (Dn’40 MHz!. A beam splitter deflects
`10% of the light to a wave meter ~Burleigh, Model WA-210!
`and a spectrum analyzer ~Tropel, Model 240! for monitoring
`of the wavelength and the linewidth. After power stabiliza-
`tion ~CRI, LS-100!, the laser light is coupled into a short
`piece of a single mode fiber ~40-692.11 from Cabloptic, core
`diam 3 mm! for spatial filtering and then collimated using a
`50.2 mm lens to a 10 mm diam beam in order to completely
`fill the microscope objective entrance aperture ~5 mm diam!.
`The mode field diameter at the fiber exit defines the size of
`the ‘‘pinhole’’ in the excitation path. A slightly ~less than
`10°! tilted holographic notch filter ~Kaiser! is then used as a
`dichroic beamsplitter with extremely sharp frequency band-
`width. It attenuates the excitation light with an optical den-
`sity .5 and transmits ’80% of the ’10 nm redshifted fluo-
`rescence emission. The beam enters a helium bath cryostat
`via bottom windows and is focused to a diffraction-limited
`spot on the sample using a microscope objective ~Newport,
`0.85 numerical aperture ~NA!, 603, focal length52.9 mm!.
`The microscope objective is located inside the cryostat to be
`very close to the sample in order to achieve a high numerical
`aperture and is used with a conjugated plane at infinity in
`order to simplify the detection optics. This, however, does
`not significantly diminish the optical performance. Thermal
`deformations during the cooling and especially the difference
`in refractive index between air (n51)and superfluid helium
`(n51.028), that fills the space between the lenses of the
`objective, have a much larger effect on the final optical reso-
`lution @800 nm full width at half maximum ~FWHM!#. The
`same objective collects the fluorescence and the remaining
`Rayleigh-scattered excitation light, which is filtered out by
`the holographic beamsplitter and a subsequent cutoff filter.
`Another holographic notch filter centered at 830 nm removes
`
`stray light introduced by the optical scanner motion detection
`system ~see Sec. II C!. A flippable mirror provides the pos-
`sibility to either direct the collimated transmitted fluores-
`cence light to an ocular for direct visual observation or focus
`the beam onto a single-photon counting avalanche photo di-
`ode ~SPAD! ~Radio Corporation of America, SPCM-100,
`200 mm diam active area!. The small active area of the
`SPAD acts as the detection pinhole. The focusing lens
`~300 mm focal length! produces a 90 mm spot ~min. to min.
`diameter! optimized for high detection efficiency9 and suffi-
`cient background rejection nedded for single molecule spec-
`troscopy. An additional lens can be flipped in the excitation
`path in order to establish wide field illumination conditions
`necessary for visual investigation of larger sample areas with
`the ocular. The SPAD is connected to a counter, which is
`read out by a computer.
`Considering the elements in the optical path, the detec-
`tion efficiency of the setup can be estimated. Assuming iso-
`tropic emission, the microscope objective with NA50.85 can
`collect 24% of the emitted light. Since molecules radiate like
`dipoles, the collection efficiency will be more or less favor-
`able depending on the orientation.18,19 The overall losses of
`the three windows of the cryostat, of the lenses and filters
`add up to 75%. Finally, the SPAD has a quantum efficiency
`of ’60% at 600 nm. All together, the total detection effi-
`ciency can be estimated to be 3.5%, which is large compared
`to other low-temperature single-molecule detection setups
`described previously.3 This enhancement is mainly due to the
`higher quantum efficiency of a SPAD as compared to a pho-
`tomultiplier.
`
`B. Mechanical design
`
`The helium bath cryostat has been homebuilt in order to
`meet the requirements of the setup. The inner diameter of
`100 mm is sufficient to contain the rather large experimenta-
`tion stage ~ES!, that is sketched in Fig. 2. The cryostat may
`be optically accessed via bottom windows allowing for a
`design where the different modules and extensions are as-
`sembled in a stack-like fashion. The ES rests on a kinematic
`mount on the bottom of the cryostat centered above the win-
`dows, compensating for the thermal dilatation. In order to
`adjust the focus, the objective can be moved in 500 nm steps
`along the optical axis using a stepper motor geared down by
`a factor of 1000. Movement is achieved by turning the ob-
`
`

`

`1708
`
`Rev. Sci. Instrum., Vol. 71, No. 4, April 2000
`
`Segura, Renn, and Hecht
`
`FIG. 2. Experimentation stage: ~KM! kinematic mount, ~M! stepper motor,
`~G! gear box, ~MO! microscope objective, ~BS! x-y bimorph scanner ~for
`clarity the bimorph piezos are not shown!, ~ZS! z scanner, ~SH! sample
`holder, ~F! optical fiber of the motion detector, ~PD! four-segment photodi-
`ode, and ~CS! shear piezo coarse-positioning scanner.
`
`jective in a fine thread ~0.5 mm pitch!. The stepper motor
`~Princeton Research Instruments, size A! is designed for
`high-vacuum applications and prepared for cryogenic opera-
`tion.
`
`C. x-y-z scanner
`
`Fine tuning of the focus is achieved by means of a z
`piezoelectric element, which is part of an x-y-z sample scan-
`ner @see Fig. 3~a!#. The z piezo consists of a bimorph disk
`~Piezomechanik GmbH! with a concentric circular opening.
`The bimorph disk is fixed to the scanner only at its outer rim.
`The sample is held by a tubelike piece of aluminum fixed to
`the inner rim of the piezoelectric disk @see Fig. 2~SH!#. By
`applying a voltage to the electrodes of the piezos, a fine
`motion of the sample in the z direction is obtained. At super-
`fluid helium temperature the maximal scan range of 6 mm
`corresponds to several motor steps. The z-motion capability
`is not only useful to precisely adjust the focus, but allows
`also for scanning and imaging of the sample in the z direc-
`tion. In combination with the x-y scanner, three-dimensional
`imaging is possible.
`The main task in designing an x-yscanner working at 1.8
`K arises from the smaller piezoelectric constant, which is
`reduced by a factor of 10 at superfluid helium temperature as
`compared to room temperature.20 We have extended a previ-
`ously used design16,21 to obtain the necessary performance.
`Figure 3~b! sketches the principle of the scanner. Four bi-
`morph piezos ~Piezomechanik GmbH! are connected by flex-
`ible metal sheets to form a square. Two facing piezos are
`
`FIG. 3. Scanner: photograph of the SCOM from the top ~a! and sketch of
`the bimorph scanner principle ~b!. ~BS! x-y bimorph scanner, ~ZS! z scan-
`ner, ~SH! sample holder, ~MO! microscope objective, and ~D! motion de-
`tector.
`
`FIG. 4. Motion detector: sketch of the x-y position detection principle. The
`numbers indicate the four quadrants of the photo diode. The formulas relate
`the signals of the quadrants to the actual x and y positions.
`
`fixed at their middle to the body of the experimentation
`stage, whereas the other pair supports the disk piezo and the
`sample. Applying a voltage to the electrodes of the bimorph
`piezos leads to a bending. The piezos that are fixed to the
`body predominantly move at the ends whereas the piezos
`that support the sample holder primarily move in the middle.
`This way, x-y scanning is achieved. A possible bending state
`of the scanner is sketched in Fig. 3~b!. For a given type of
`bimorph, the scan range is limited only by the length of the
`piezos. By using enough long piezos ~51 mm!, movements as
`large as 23 mm at 1.8 K could be achieved, which represents
`a significant improvement compared to previous scanners.
`Due to its large physical dimension the scanner has a
`low resonance frequency of 55 Hz and is therefore quite sen-
`sitive to vibrations. In order to reduce noise, the cryostat
`rests on a vibration-damped optical table and is additionaly
`isolated from the table by rubber plates. This way the sample
`position is stable within 610 nm, which is much more accu-
`rate than the optical resolution. The resonance frequency
`limits the maximal scanning frequency to ’1 Hz. However,
`scans are anyway slow in practice in order to guarantee
`enough integration time.
`We use commercial electronics for the control of the
`scan and the data acquisition ~ECS SPM Control System!.
`With this system two scanners can be controlled simulta-
`neously, allowing a further extension by a scanning probe
`microscope. Two high voltage amplifiers ~Ergonomics! gen-
`erate the scanning voltages ranging from 230 to 300 V.
`A very practical feature of the setup is the ability to
`monitor directly the actual position of the scanner. This can
`be used to linearize the scanner motion by means of a posi-
`tion feedback loop as explained later. Furthermore, problems
`with the scanner can be easily recognized, which is impor-
`tant when working in a cryostat at liquid helium temperature,
`where direct visual inspection is not possible. The position
`detector ~see Fig. 4! consists of a single mode infrared ~IR!
`fiber attached to the scanner and a four-segment photodiode
`integrated in the body of the experimentation stage. IR light
`at 830 nm emitted by a diode laser ~VOMAG, 57PNL008! is
`coupled into the far end of the fiber. The light emerging from
`the fiber end is projected onto the four segments of the pho-
`todiode. The distribution of the resulting spot over the dif-
`ferent segments depends on the actual position of the scan-
`ner. The diameter of the spot is chosen large enough to
`guarantee linearity of the detector. By measuring the relative
`IR intensity on the four segments, it is possible to monitor
`
`

`

`Rev. Sci. Instrum., Vol. 71, No. 4, April 2000
`
`Confocal optical microscope
`
`1709
`
`FIG. 5. Interferometric measurement of the slip-stick movement at room
`temperature: between the maximum and the minimum of the curve, the
`sample travels a distance of 207 nm. Each single step corresponds to a
`distance of 10 nm.
`
`the scanner motion with high accuracy.22 The resolution we
`achieved is ’50 nm and is mainly limited by intensity fluc-
`tuations and mode hops of the diode laser. In order to mini-
`mize these effects, the laser is enclosed in a 5 kg copper
`block, which acts as a temperature stabilizer. The position
`detector provides the opportunity to linearize the scanner
`motion and thus to correct for two disturbing effects inherent
`to the bimorph piezos: ~i! the piezoelectric hysteresis and ~ii!
`the piezoelectric creep. Hysteresis introduces a nonlinear
`motion of the scanner and thus causes distortions of the im-
`age. Creep manifests itself in the fact that static and dynamic
`voltage versus position relations of the bimorph piezos are
`different. At the end of a scan or a motion, the position of the
`scanner creeps to a stable point. As a result of this effect, an
`interesting molecule found during a scan at a certain location
`cannot be moved anymore into a static focus. Fortunately,
`these two effects are not present at superfluid helium tem-
`
`FIG. 7. Crystal of p-terphenyl doped with pentacene at 1.8 K. n¯
`516880.11 cm21, I exc540 W/cm2, integration time/pixel514 ms.
`
`perature making the use of the position feedback loop unnec-
`essary at this temperature.23 However, the position feedback
`is indispensable for experiments at 77 K or at room tempera-
`ture.
`
`D. Sample coarse positioning
`
`Coarse positioning of the sample is a necessary capabil-
`ity of the microscope in any real experiment. Due to thermal
`drifts, it is impossible to choose the right location on the
`sample for a given experiment before the cooling. It may
`happen that the final sample position is unattractive, which in
`the worst case necessitates a new cooling cycle if no coarse
`positioning is available. Moreover, coarse positioning can be
`very useful by allowing one to prepare several samples on a
`single coverslip and to switch between them at low tempera-
`ture.
`We have designed a coarse-positioning system based on
`a previously described inertia drive.24,25 A sapphire ball is
`glued on a set of two perpendiculary oriented shear piezos
`~Staveley, EBL2! fixed on the bimorph scanner @see Fig. 2
`~CS!#. Sapphire slides glued to the holder of the disk piezo
`sit on the top of the ball. In order to move the holder of the
`disk piezo relatively to the bimorph scanner, a sawtooth-like
`
`FIG. 6. Example of slip-stick motion. Each image has successively been
`taken after a displacement of some micrometers in each directions. Three
`molecules are surrounded by circles to facilitate comparison. The slightly
`different appearance of molecules in the images is due to laser frequency
`drifts during the acquisition time of the four pictures.
`
`FIG. 8. Line cut through a small spot as indicated at the bottom of Fig. 7.
`n¯ 516880.11 cm21, I exc540 W/cm2, integration time/point514 ms.
`
`

`

`1710
`
`Rev. Sci. Instrum., Vol. 71, No. 4, April 2000
`
`Segura, Renn, and Hecht
`
`voltage is applied to the shear piezos. During the slow in-
`crease, the load moves together with the shear piezos. How-
`ever, when the voltage is abruptly switched off, the sample
`holder slips on the sapphire balls. A macroscopic motion is
`created by inducing many of these slip-stick events. Due to
`the previously mentioned reduction of the piezoelectric elon-
`gation at liquid helium temperature, it was found to be nec-
`essary to apply high voltages to the shear piezos in order to
`overcome the contact friction. We typically use a sawtooth
`function with an amplitude of at least 600 V and a frequency
`of 1600 Hz. The speed can be tuned by changing the voltage
`or the number of steps per second. The coarse-positioning
`device is isotropic and has a high reproducibility from room
`temperature to 1.8 K. Figure 5 shows an interferometric de-
`tection of the macroscopic slip-stick motion at room tem-
`perature. Taking into account the intrinsic nonlinearity of the
`interferometer, a smooth motion by single steps of ’10 nm
`can be recognized.
`In Fig. 6, the four images of a crystal of p-terphenyl
`doped with pentacene molecules illustrate the capability of
`the slip-stick motion assembly at 1.8 K. Each picture has
`successively been taken after a displacement of some mi-
`crometers. To facilitate comparison between images, some
`molecules are surrounded by circles.
`
`III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`Figure 7 is an illustration of typical images obtained
`with the SCOM at 1.8 K. The picture shows single molecules
`of pentacene embedded in a p-terphenyl crystal. An intrigu-
`ing feature is the distribution of spot sizes ranging from 800
`nm to some microns. As explained later, this is a typical
`effect of low temperature SCOM of single molecules. Figure
`8 displays a line cut through a small spot as indicated at the
`bottom of Fig. 7. Considering that the shape is not absolutely
`symmetric, the optical resolution can this way be estimated
`to be at least 800 nm FWHM.
`The broad features in Fig. 7 do not originate from optical
`aberrations, but rather are examples of the coupling between
`spectral properties and spatial images of single molecules at
`superfluid helium temperature. Due to the narrow ZPL, the
`absorption cross section is extremely high, and the optical
`transition can be easily saturated. If the excitation intensity is
`well above saturation in the center of the spot, the confocal
`volume needs to be notably displaced in order to produce a
`change in the emitted fluorescence. Thus, the molecules ap-
`
`FIG. 9. Frequency scan at the position indicated by the arrow in Fig. 7. The
`scan range is 1 GHz, n¯ 516880.11 cm21, I exc540 W/cm2, integration time
`585 ms.
`
`pear much broader than the actual confocal volume. On the
`other hand, the small spots represents molecules that are sig-
`nificantly detuned from resonance and therefore well below
`saturation. Figure 9 shows a local frequency scan at the po-
`sition marked by an arrow in Fig. 7. Compared to the
`lifetime-limited linewidth ~11.763.8 MHz obtained from a
`saturation study!, the line at zero detuning is strongly power
`broadened @58.9~3.5! MHz#. This proves that the optical tran-
`sition is saturated and explains the appreciable size of the
`single-molecule spot in the SCOM image. Accordingly, due
`to different excitation intensities, the observed linewidth var-
`ies depending on the position in the spot ~at the maximum or
`on the side! where the frequency scan is taken. Such local
`frequency scans are very useful for interpretation purposes
`and are a strong advantage of low temperature confocal mi-
`croscopy. Due to these broadening effects, the separation be-
`tween molecules requires a large scan range even if the op-
`tical resolution is close to the diffraction limit.
`The combination of spectral and spatial information is
`illustrated in Figs. 10~a! and 10~b! with two images of a
`crystal of p-terphenyl doped with terrylene at 1.8K. Both
`images are recorded at the same position, but with a 1 GHz
`shifted excitation frequency. Due to the narrow ZPL, differ-
`ent molecules are in resonance in the two images. It is inter-
`esting to notice that some spatially overlapping molecules
`can be separated in the spectral dimension. As an example, a
`frequency scan was performed at the position of the central
`
`FIG. 10. Single molecules of terrylene in p-terphenyl at 1.8 K. The excitation frequency is shifted by 1 GHz between images ~a! and ~b!. l5578.49 nm,
`I exc5460 W/cm2, integration time/pixel538 ms. ~c!: Frequency scan at the position of the molecule in the center of image ~b!. The scan range is 1 GHz,
`l5578.49 nm, I exc5750 W/cm2, integration time585 ms.
`
`

`

`Rev. Sci. Instrum., Vol. 71, No. 4, April 2000
`
`Confocal optical microscope
`
`1711
`
`singer, and Professor U. P. Wild for continual help and sup-
`port. This project has been founded by the Swiss Priority
`Program NFP 36 and the ETH Zu¨rich.
`
`1 Single-Molecule Optical Detection, Imaging and Spectroscopy, edited by
`T. Basche´, W. E. Moerner, M. Orrit, and U. P. Wild ~VCH Verlagsgesell-
`schaft, Weinheim, 1997!.
`2 X. S. Xie and J. K. Trautman, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 49, 441 ~1998!.
`3 T. Plakhotnik, E. A. Donley, and U. P. Wild, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 48,
`181 ~1997!.
`4 W. E. Moerner and M. Orrit, Science 283, 1670 ~1999!.
`5 F. Gu¨ttler, T. Irngartinger, T. Plakhotnik, A. Renn, and U. P. Wild, Chem.
`Phys. Lett. 217, 393 ~1994!.
`6 J. Jasny, J. Sepiol, T. Irngartinger, M. Traber, A. Renn, and U. P. Wild,
`Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67, 1425 ~1996!.
`7 M. Croci, T. Irngartinger, A. Renn, and U. P. Wild, Exp. Tech. Phys.
`~Lemgo, Ger.! 41, 249 ~1995!.
`8 Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, 2nd ed., edited by J.B.
`Pawley ~Plenum, New York, 1995!.
`9 R. H. Webb, Rep. Prog. Phys. 59, 427 ~1996!.
`10 D. J. Norris, M. Kuwata-Gonokami, and W. E. Moerner, Appl. Phys. Lett.
`71, 297 ~1997!.
`11 W. E. Moerner, T. Plakhotnik, T. Irngartinger, U. P. Wild, D. W. Pohl,
`and B. Hecht, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2764 ~1994!.
`12 M. Va´cha, H. Yokoyama, T. Tokizaki, M. Furuki, and T. Tani, Rev. Sci.
`Instrum. 70, 2041 ~1999!.
`13 R. D. Grober, T. D. Harris, J. K. Trautman, and E. Betzig, Rev. Sci.
`Instrum. 65, 626 ~1994!.
`14 G. Behme, A. Richter, M. Su¨ptitz, and C. Lienau, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68,
`3458 ~1997!.
`15 Y. Durand, J. C. Woehl, B. Viellerobe, W. Go¨hde, and M. Orrit, Rev. Sci.
`Instrum. 70, 1318 ~1999!.
`16 W. Go¨hde, J. Tittel, T. Basche´, C. Bra¨uchle, U. C. Fischer, and H. Fuchs,
`Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68, 2466 ~1997!.
`17 S. Smith, H. M. Cheong, B. D. Fluegel, J. F. Geisz, J. M. Olson, L. L.
`Kazmerski, and A. Mascarenhas, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 706 ~1999!.
`18 W. Lukosz, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 744 ~1981!.
`19 T. Plakhotnik, W. E. Moerner, V. Palm, and U. P. Wild, Opt. Commun.
`114, 83 ~1995!.
`20 T. M. Tritt, D. J. Gillespie, G. N. Kamm, and A. C. Ehrlich, Rev. Sci.
`Instrum. 58, 780 ~1987!.
`21 P. Muralt, D. W. Pohl, and W. Denk, IBM J. Res. Dev. 30, 443 ~1986!.
`22 U. Du¨rig, D. W. Pohl, and F. Rohner, J. Appl. Phys. 59, 3318 ~1986!.
`23 S. Vieira, IBM J. Res. Dev. 30, 553 ~1986!.
`24 D. W. Pohl, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 58, 54 ~1987!.
`25 J. W. Lyding, S. Skala, J. S. Hubacek, R. Brockenbrough, and G. Gam-
`mie, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59, 1897 ~1988!.
`
`at 1.8 K.
`FIG. 11. Crystal of p-terphenyl doped with terrylene
`l5578.51 nm, I exc55.3 kW/cm2, integration time/pixel528 ms. The cut-
`off filter has been removed in order to see the crystal structure by means of
`Rayleigh-scattered excitation light.
`
`spot in image ~b! @see Fig. 10~c!#. It reveals the presence of
`two molecules that are separated in frequency by only about
`100 MHz. This methodology can be used to correlate data
`obtained in the spectral and spatial dimensions. Another type
`of information is obtained in Fig. 11 recorded at the same
`location as in Fig. 10, but with the cutoff filter behind the
`notch removed. As a result some of the Rayleigh-scattered
`laser light can reach the detector. Different crystal domains
`are clearly recognizable as well as some molecules of ter-
`rylene, which seem to accumulate close to the grain joints.
`This kind of image is very useful in order to correlate the
`single-molecule properties with the macroscopic environ-
`ment, which is quite difficult in classical single-molecule de-
`tection schemes.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`
`The authors want to especially thank A. Hunkeler and B.
`Lambillotte for excellent mechanical support. The authors
`are grateful to E. Donley, P. Nyffeler, B. Sick, W. Trabe-
`
`
`
`View publication statsView publication stats
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket