`
`NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`POLARIS INNOVATIONS LIMITED,
`Appellant
`
`v.
`
`UNITED STATES,
`Intervenor
`______________________
`
`2018-1831
`______________________
`
`Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-
`00116.
`
`______________________
`
`JUDGMENT
`______________________
`
`AZRA HADZIMEHMEDOVIC, Tensegrity Law Group LLP,
`McLean, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by
`SAMANTHA A. JAMESON, AARON MATTHEW NATHAN;
`MATTHEW D. POWERS, DANIEL RADKE, Redwood Shores,
`CA; NATHAN NOBU LOWENSTEIN, KENNETH
`J.
`WEATHERWAX, Lowenstein & Weatherwax LLP, Los Ange-
`les, CA.
`
` PETER J. AYERS, Office of the Solicitor, United States
`Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for
`
`
`
`Case: 18-1831 Document: 169 Page: 2 Filed: 12/07/2022
`
`
`
`intervenor. Also represented by DANIEL KAZHDAN, THOMAS
`W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED; COURTNEY
`DIXON, JOSEPH H. HUNT, SCOTT R. MCINTOSH, MELISSA N.
`PATTERSON, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, United States
`Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
` ______________________
`
`THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
`
`ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
`
` PER CURIAM (DYK, REYNA, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit
`Judges).
`
`AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
`
`
` ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
`
`
`
`December 7, 2022
`Date
`
`/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
`Peter R. Marksteiner
`Clerk of Court
`
`
`
`