Panasonic’s
`Demonstrative Exhibits
`
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft, Inc.
`IPR2019-00131
`Petition Based On U.S. Pat. No. 9,258,698
`
`January 28, 2020
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`Demonstrative Exhibits
`
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft, Inc.
`IPR2019-00131
`Petition Based On U.S. Pat. No. 9,258,698
`
`January 28, 2020
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00131 Outline
`
`• Overview
`• Contested Issues
`– Limitation C: “short-range paired wireless connection" comprising
`"cryptographically authenticating"
`– Limitation G: “receiving a data transfer request from the cellular phone”
`– Limitation J: “use HTTP to upload the received new-media file along with user
`information”
`– Limitation K: “using a GUI to delete the created new media file”
`– Claims 5 and 8: "a [mobile] software application"
`• Motions to Strike
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`2
`
`
`
`Overview
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 9,258,698 (“the ’698 Patent”)
`
`• Title: “Automatic Multimedia Upload For
`Publishing Data and Multimedia Content”
`• Earliest asserted priority date: December 28,
`2007
`
`Ex. 1003
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00131 Overview
`
`• Challenged Claims: 1, 3-5, 7-8, 10-13, and 15-20
`• Claims 1, 5, 8, and 13 are independent
`• Ground of Unpatentability: The Challenged Claims are unpatentable under 35
`U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-51772
`("Mashita"), in combination with Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-299014
`("Onishi") and Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2004-102810
`("Hiraishi").
`
`Pet. at 6-8; Institution Dec. at 6-8
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`5
`
`
`
`Mashita
`
`• Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-51772
`• Title: “Communication Device, Information Processing
`Unit, Communication Method, Program for Performing
`Communication, and Computer-Readable Storage
`Medium for Storing the Program”
`• Named Inventor: Hiroshi Mashita
`• Filed: August 6, 2001
`• Prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
`
`Exs. 1005/1006; Pet. at 8; see Resp. at 21-31
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`6
`
`
`
`'698 Patent Compared to Mashita
`
`Cellular phone
`(or mobile phone, PDA)
`
`Internet
`
`short-range wireless capability
`
`CAMERA
`
`See Exs. 1003; 1005/1006
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`7
`
`
`
`Onishi
`
`• Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-299014
`• Title: “Digital Camera Device”
`• Named Inventors: Jiro Onishi, Minoru Gejima
`• Filed: May 30, 2002
`• Prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
`
`Exs. 1007/1008; Pet. at 8; see Resp. at 31-32
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`8
`
`
`
`Hiraishi
`
`• Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-51772
`• Title: “Information Processing Device, Information
`Providing Device, Programs for Implementing
`These Devices, and Storage Medium Storing
`These Programs in Computer-Readable Manner”
`• Named Inventor: Tomonobu Hiraishi
`• Filed: September 11, 2002
`• Prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
`
`Exs. 1009/1010; Pet. at 8; Resp. at 32
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`9
`
`
`
`Contested Issue #1
`Limitation C: “short-range paired wireless connection”
`comprising “cryptographically authenticating”
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`Limitation C: Language from Each Independent Claim
`
`Claim 1
`"establishing a short-
`range paired wireless
`connection between the
`digital camera device
`and the cellular phone,
`wherein establishing
`the short-range paired
`wireless connection
`comprises, the digital
`camera device
`cryptographically
`authenticating identify
`of the cellular phone;"
`
`Claim 5
`"a short-range wireless
`communication device configured
`to control the first processor to
`establish a short-range paired
`wireless connection between the
`short-range wireless enabled
`digital camera device and a
`short-range wireless enabled
`cellular phone, wherein
`establishing the short-range
`paired wireless connection
`comprises, the digital camera
`device cryptographically
`authenticating identify of the
`cellular phone;"
`
`Claim 8
`"a short-range wireless
`communication device
`configured to establish a short-
`range paired wireless
`connection with an internet
`connected cellular phone,
`wherein establishing the short-
`range paired wireless
`connection comprises, the
`digital camera device
`cryptographically
`authenticating identify of the
`cellular phone; . . . after
`establishing the short-range
`paired wireless connection . . ."
`
`Claim 13
`"after establishing a short-
`range paired wireless
`connection between the
`digital camera device and
`a cellular phone, wherein
`establishing the short-
`range paired wireless
`connection comprises, the
`digital camera device
`cryptographically
`authenticating identify of
`the cellular phone; . . .
`over the established
`short-range paired
`wireless connection. . . "
`
`Ex. 1003
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`11
`
`
`
`Mashita Discloses Limitation C: The Parties’ Arguments
`
`Panasonic’s Arguments
`Mashita discloses the same pairing and
`cryptographic authentication process as
`the '698 patent itself and as taught in the
`Bluetooth specifications
`At minimum, Limitation [C] would have
`been an obvious implementation of the
`Bluetooth connections disclosed in the
`three prior art references.
`
`Cellspin’s Arguments
`Mashita discloses a connection that is
`authenticated but not paired and does not
`use an encryption algorithm.
`
`The cited references do not render obvious
`a paired connection.
`
`Pet. at 37-43; Resp. at 32-38; Reply at 7-23
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`12
`
`
`
`Both Mashita and the '698 Patent Disclose a Bluetooth
`Connection
`
`'698 Patent
`
`Mashita
`
`Ex. 1003 at 2:5-11; Ex. 1006 at [0016-17]; Pet. at 37-43;
`Reply at 7-23
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`13
`
`
`
`Mashita’s Description of Pairing Matches that in the '698
`Patent
`
`'698 Patent
`
`Mashita
`
`Ex. 1003 at 4:1-8, 17-25; Ex. 1006 at [0051]; Pet. at 37-43;
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Reply at 7-23
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`14
`
`
`
`Mashita’s Description of Pairing Matches that in the '698
`Patent
`'698 Patent
`
`Mashita
`
`Ex. 1003 at 4:14-21; Ex. 1006 at [0030], [0094]; Pet. at 37-
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`43; Reply at 7-23
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`15
`
`
`
`Bluetooth Core Specification Confirms Mashita's
`Disclosure of Paired Connection Using a PIN
`Foley Deposition Excerpt
`Strawn Declaration Excerpt
`
`Ex .1001 at ¶¶ 54, 87; Ex. 1023 at 48:14-21, 56:18-25;
`Pet. at 37-43; Reply at 7-23
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`16
`
`
`
`Bluetooth Core Specification Confirms Mashita's
`Disclosure of Paired Connection Using a PIN
`
`Ex . 1017 at 29; Pet. at 37-43; Reply at 7-18
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`17
`
`
`
`Bluetooth Specification Confirms Mashita's Disclosure
`of Establishing Paired Connection Using a PIN
`
`Ex . 2018 at 866; Response at 33-34; Reply at 10-12
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`18
`
`
`
`Cellspin's Argument Relating to "Passkey" is Wrong
`
`Ex. 2018 (Bluetooth Version 2.1+EDR Core Specification) at 1258; Ex. 1024, ¶
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`48; Pet. at 37-43; Response at 38-39; Reply at 7-10, 13
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`19
`
`
`
`Cellspin's Argument Relating to "Passkey" is Wrong
`
`Ex. 1023 at 89:9-24; Pet. at 37-43; Reply at 7-23
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`20
`
`
`
`Cellspin's Reference to Secure Simple Pairing is
`Inapposite
`
`Ex .1023 at 52:17-53:12; Reply at 15
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`21
`
`
`
`Cellspin's Reference to Secure Simple Pairing is
`Inapposite
`
`Ex. 2018 at 131; Reply at 7-10
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`22
`
`
`
`Cellspin's Contention That Mashita only Discloses
`Authentication and not Pairing is Wrong
`
`Resp. at 24; Exs.1023 at 57:4-8; Reply at 13-14
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`23
`
`
`
`Cellspin's Contention That Mashita only Discloses
`Authentication and not Pairing is Wrong
`
`No PIN
`
`Ex. 2018 at 867; Response at 33-34; Reply at 13-14
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`24
`
`
`
`“Paired Connection” Need Not Be Construed
`
`Panasonic’s Construction
`
`Cellspin’s Construction
`
`No construction needed
`
`Resp. at 14; Reply at 3
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`25
`
`
`
`Construction of “Cryptographically Authenticating”
`
`Panasonic’s Construction
`Authenticates the identity of the cellular
`phone using some form of secrecy,
`security, or encryption, including by use
`of a shared passkey on the digital
`camera device and the cellular phone
`
`Cellspin’s Construction
`Verified as a legitimate transmission, user,
`or system including by use of encryption
`and decryption involving an algorithm
`
`Pet. at 10-12; Resp. at 10-19; Reply at 4-5
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`26
`
`
`
`Claim Construction – Cryptographically Authenticating
`
`Petition at 10-12; Ex. 1003 3:65-4:8
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`27
`
`
`
`Mashita Discloses Cryptographic Authentication under
`the Proper Claim Construction
`The '698 Patent
`
`Mashita
`
`Ex. 1003 at 3:65-4:8; 1006 at ¶ [0051]; Petition at 37-43; Reply at 18.
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`28
`
`
`
`Mashita Discloses Cryptographic Authentication under
`the Proper Claim Construction
`
`Strawn
`Declaration
`
`Pet. at 41; Ex. 1001 at ¶ 87; Ex. 1017 at 50-51.
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`29
`
`
`
`Cellspin’s Contention:
`
`Resp. at 17-18
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131 30
`
`
`
`Mashita Discloses Cryptographic Authentication even
`under Cellspin’s Construction
`
`Pet. at 41; Ex. 1001 at ¶ 87; Ex. 1017 at 51; Reply at 18-19.
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`31
`
`
`
`Mashita Discloses Cryptographic Authentication even
`under Cellspin’s Construction
`
`Pet. at 41; Ex. 1001 at ¶ 87; Ex. 2018 at 1055-57; Reply at 18-19.
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`32
`
`
`
`Mashita
`
`Ex. 1006 at ¶ [0051]: Petition at 37-43; Reply at 18-19
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131 33
`
`
`
`A Paired, Cryptographically Authenticated Connection
`would have been Obvious to a POSITA
`
`Mashita
`
`Foley Deposition
`
`Ex 1006 at ¶ [0016]-[0017]; 1023 at 42:25-43:6; Pet. at
`33-35, 39, 41; Reply at 19-22
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`34
`
`
`
`Resp. at 37-38, 49; Reply at 20-22
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131 35
`
`
`
`BIP Teaches that a Paired Connection is Suitable for
`Image Transfer
`
`Ex 1020 at 16; Pet. at 33-35; Reply at 20-22
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`36
`
`
`
`A Paired, Cryptographically Authenticated Connection
`would have been Obvious to a POSITA
`
`Petition at 39, 41; Ex 1023 at 47:1-20; Reply at 19-22
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`37
`
`
`
`BIP Teaches that a Paired Connection is Suitable for
`Image Transfer
`
`Ex 1023 at 41:24-42:12; Pet. at 33-35; Reply at 7-23
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`38
`
`
`
`A Paired, Cryptographically Authenticated Connection
`would have been Obvious to a POSITA
`
`Ex 1023 at 44:14-18, 20-45:1; 45:25-46:3; Pet. 25-33;
`Reply at 7-23
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`39
`
`
`
`Contested Issue #2
`Limitation G: “receiving a data transfer request from the
`cellular phone”
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`Limitation G is Obvious In Light of Mashita and Hiraishi
`
`'698 Patent - Claim 1,
`Limitation G
`receiving a data transfer request
`initiated by a software application
`on the cellular phone over the
`established short-range paired
`wireless connection, wherein the
`data transfer request is for the
`new-media file, and wherein the
`new-media file was created in the
`digital camera device before
`receiving the data transfer
`request; and
`
`Prior Art
`
`Mashita
`[0061] First, in response to the user's operation, the cellular
`phone 102 initiates the Model A file transfer program 403
`downloaded from the server 105 and then stored in the
`application memory 304 (step S601).
`[0064] When the destination address is input in step S603, the
`cellular phone 102 waits to receive the image file from the
`digital camera 101 to which the cellular phone 102 is locally
`wirelessly connected. Then, when receiving the image file from
`the digital camera 101, the cellular phone 102 stores the image
`file in the RAM 303 (step S604).
`
`Ex. 1003; Ex. 1006 at ¶¶ [0061], [0064]; Pet 51-57; Reply at 23
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`41
`
`
`
`Limitation G is Obvious In Light of Mashita and Hiraishi
`
`'698 Patent - Claim 1,
`Limitation G
`receiving a data transfer
`request initiated by a software
`application on the cellular
`phone over the established
`short-range paired wireless
`connection, wherein the data
`transfer request is for the new-
`media file, and wherein the
`new-media file was created in
`the digital camera device
`before receiving the data
`transfer request; and
`
`Prior Art
`
`Hiraishi
`[0017] “… The data transfer interface 116 may be whichever of a
`wired interface … and a wireless interface, represented by IrDA
`and Bluetooth. Upon receiving a command from an OS or
`dedicated software installed in the PC 102, the image input device
`101 collectively transfers the pieces of image data stored in an
`information storage device of the image input device 101. In
`other cases, the image input device 101 transmits a transfer
`command to cause the OS or the dedicated software of the PC
`102 to secure an image data storage area in the storage device of
`the PC 102, and then transfers the image data.”
`
`Ex. 1003; Ex. 1010 at ¶ [0017]; Pet. at 51-57; Reply at 23
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`42
`
`
`
`Limitation G is Obvious in View of the Combination
`
`Mashita
`
`Ex. 1006 at ¶¶ [0064], [0070-72]; 1023 at 104:13-21;
`Pet. at 51-57; Reply at 23
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`43
`
`
`
`Contested Issue #3
`Limitation J: “use HTTP to upload the received new-media file
`along with user information”
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`Limitation J is Obvious in View of the Combination
`
`Mashita
`
`Ex. 1006 at ¶ [0089]; Pet. at 61-65; Reply at 23-27
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`45
`
`
`
`Limitation J is Obvious in View of the Combination
`
`Hiraishi
`
`Ex. 1010 at ¶¶ [0023], [0026], [0028]; Pet. at 61-65; Reply at 23-27
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`46
`
`
`
`Limitation J is Obvious in View of the Combination –
`“Teaching Away" is Factually Wrong
`
`Ex. 1006 at ¶ [0007]; Pet. at 61-65; Reply at 23-27
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`47
`
`
`
`Limitation J is Obvious in View of the Combination –
`“Teaching Away" is Factually Wrong
`
`Ex. 1023 at 20:19-22; Ex. 1025 at 1; Pet. at 61-65; Reply at
`23-27
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`48
`
`
`
`Limitation J is Obvious in View of the Combination –
`“Teaching Away" is Factually Wrong
`
`Mashita
`
`Ex. 1006 at [Claim 15]; 1023 at 18:14-19; Pet. at 61-65;
`Reply at 23-27
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`49
`
`
`
`Limitation J is Obvious in View of the Combination –
`“Teaching Away" is Factually Wrong
`
`Mashita
`
`Ex. 1006 at ¶¶ [0015], [0020], [0034]; 1023 at 17:21-18:4;
`Pet. at 61-65; Reply at 23-27
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`50
`
`
`
`Limitation J is Obvious in View of the Combination –
`“Teaching Away" is Factually Wrong
`
`Strawn Declaration
`
`Ex. 1001 at ¶ 125; 1023 at 85:11-21; Pet. at 61-65; Reply at
`23-27
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`51
`
`
`
`Contested Issue #4
`Limitation K: “using a GUI to delete the created new media file”
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`Construction of “Graphical User Interface (GUI)”
`
`Panasonic’s Construction
`A user interface involving graphical
`elements
`
`Cellspin’s Construction
`“an interface through which a user
`interacts with electronic devices such as
`computers, hand-held devices and other
`appliances. This interface uses icons,
`menus and other visual indicator
`(graphics) representations to display
`information and related user controls,
`unlike text-based interfaces, where data
`and commands are in text. GUI
`representations are manipulated by a
`pointing device such as a mouse, trackball,
`stylus, or a finger on a touch screen.”
`
`Pet. at 10-14; Resp. at 19-21; Reply at 5-6
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`53
`
`
`
`Claim construction - GUI
`
`The '698 Patent
`
`Ex. 1003 at Fig. 5; Ex. 1008 at Figs. 1, 7; Ex. 1014 at
`13; Ex. 1016 at 6; Pet. at 13-14, 67; Reply at 5-6
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`54
`
`
`
`Limitation K is obvious – Mashita discloses GUI
`
`Ex. 1006 at ¶¶ [0037], [0063]; Pet. at 65-69; Reply at 27-29
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`55
`
`
`
`Limitation K is obvious – Onishi discloses GUI
`
`Ex. 1008 at Fig. 1; Pet. at 65-69; Reply at 27-29
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`56
`
`
`
`Contested Issue #5
`Claims 5 and 8: “a [mobile] software application”
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`The Claims Do Not Require a Single Application
`
`Claim 5
`said first processor configured to receive a
`data transfer request initiated by a mobile
`software application on the
`cellular phone, over the established short-
`range paired wireless connection, . . .
`
`said first processor configured to transfer
`the new-media file to the cellular phone, . .
`. wherein the cellular phone comprises a
`mobile software application, . . .
`
`Claim 8
`said first processor configured to receive a
`data transfer request initiated by a
`Software application on the cellular phone,
`. . .
`said software application for the cellular
`phone, wherein the software application is
`embodied as executable program
`instructions that when executed by a
`processor of the cellular phone, . . .
`
`Ex. 1003; Reply at 6-7, 29-30
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`58
`
`
`
`The Claims Do Not Require a Single Application
`
`Ex. 1023 at 79:20-82:23; Reply at 6-7, 29-30
`
`Panasonic Ex. 1033
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al. v. Cellspin Soft Inc, IPR2019-00131
`
`59
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
