`IPR2019-00129
`
`
`DOCKET NO.: 0107131-00573US5
`Filed on behalf of Intel Corporation
`By: David L. Cavanaugh, Reg. No. 36,476
`John V. Hobgood, Reg. No. 61,540
`Benjamin S. Fernandez, Reg. No. 55,172
`Gregory H. Lantier, pro hac vice
`Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
`1875 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`Tel: (202) 663-6000
`Email:
`David.Cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com
`
`John.Hobgood@wilmerhale.com
`
`Ben.Fernandez@wilmerhale.com
`
`Gregory.Lantier@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________________________________
`
`
`INTEL CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2019-00129
`U.S. Patent No. 9,154,356
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`IPR2019-00129
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Board’s May 29, 2019 Scheduling
`
`Order for IPR2019-00129 (Paper 10), Petitioner Intel Corporation respectfully
`
`requests oral argument for the trial currently scheduled on February 27, 2020.
`
`Petitioner specifies the following issues to be argued:
`
` Issues related to the Board’s Decision on Institution and the grounds
`
`instituted in the Decision
`
` Whether claims 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 are unpatentable under Section 102 as
`
`anticipated by Lee
`
` Whether claim 10 is unpatentable under Section 103 as obvious over
`
`Lee in view of Youssef
`
` Whether claims 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 are unpatentable under Section 103 as
`
`obvious over Lee in view of Feasibility Study
`
` Whether claim 10 is unpatentable under Section 103 as obvious over
`
`Lee in view of the Feasibility Study and Youssef
`
` Reply to any arguments raised in the Patent Owner’s Response and
`
`Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply (if any)
`
` Response to any issues specified by Patent Owner in its request for oral
`
`argument
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`IPR2019-00129
`
`Petitioner reserves the right to address any arguments presented by the Patent
`
`Owner and any other issues about which the Board wishes to hear arguments during
`
`the oral hearing.
`
`Petitioner requests the ability to use a computer, projector, and screen to
`
`display possible demonstratives and/or exhibits.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`January 16, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Benjamin S. Fernandez/
`Benjamin S. Fernandez
`Registration No. 55,172
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`IPR2019-00129
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on January 16, 2020, I caused a true and correct
`copy of the foregoing material:
`
` Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`to be served via electronic mail, as previously agreed by the parties, on the
`following attorneys of record:
`David B. Cochran (dcochran@jonesday.com)
`Matthew W. Johnson (mwjohnson@jonesday.com)
`Joseph M. Sauer (jmsauer@jonesday.com)
`Joshua R. Nightingale (jrnightingale@jonesday.com)
`David M. Maiorana (dmaiorana@jonesday.com)
`Thomas W. Ritchie (twritchie@jonesday.com)
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/Benjamin S. Fernandez/
`Benjamin S. Fernandez
`Registration No. 55,172
`
`
`
`Dated: January 16, 2020
`
`
`
`1
`
`