`
`Case No. IPR2019-00129
`Patent No. 9,154,356
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Intel Corporation,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`Qualcomm Incorporated,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No: IPR2019-00129
`U.S. Patent No. 9,154,356
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Patent Owner Qualcomm, Inc.
`
`Case No. IPR2019-00129
`Patent No. 9,154,356
`
`
`(“Qualcomm”) hereby requests an opportunity to present oral argument regarding
`
`the unpatentability of the instituted claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,154,356 (“the ’356
`
`patent”).
`
`Specifically, Qualcomm plans to present arguments on:
`
`1. The correct construction of the claim term “carrier aggregation”;
`
`2. Why claims 2–6 are not anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102 by Lee;
`
`3. Why claim 10 is not obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Lee and Youssef;
`
`4. Why claims 2–6 are not obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Lee and the
`
`Feasibility Study;
`
`5. Why claim 10 is not obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Lee, the
`
`Feasibility Study, and Youssef; and,
`
`6. Any additional issues on which the Board seeks clarification, or which the
`
`Board deems necessary for issuing a final written decision.
`
`This request is being filed concurrently with a Request for Oral Argument in
`
`related case IPR2019-00128, which is scheduled for oral argument on the same day
`
`(February 27, 2020).
`
`Qualcomm requests to use audio/visual equipment to display demonstrative
`
`exhibits, including the use of a projector and screen for a PowerPoint display. In
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`accordance with the Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. at 48768, Qualcomm will
`
`Case No. IPR2019-00129
`Patent No. 9,154,356
`
`
`contact the Board Trial Division paralegal to discuss this request.
`
`
`
`Dated: January 16, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/Thomas W. Ritchie/
`Thomas W. Ritchie (Reg. No. 65,505)
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2019-00129
`Patent No. 9,154,356
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on January 16,
`
`2020, a complete and entire copy of PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL
`
`HEARING has been served in its entirety by e-mail on the following addresses of
`
`record for Petitioner:
`
`Lead Counsel:
`David L. Cavanaugh
`Reg. No. 36,476
`David.Cavanaugh@wilmerhale.c
`om
`
`Postal and Hand-Delivery
`Address:
`Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale
`and Dorr LLP
`1875 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`Telephone: (202) 663-6000
`Fax: (202) 663-6363
`
`
`Dated: January 16, 2020
`
`Backup Counsel:
`John V. Hobgood
`Reg. No. 61,540
`John.Hobgood@wilmerhale.com
`
`Benjamin S. Fernandez
`Reg. No. 55,172
`Ben.Fernandez@wilmerhale.com
`
`Gregory T. Lantier
`Gregory.Lantier@wilmerhale.com
`
`Postal and Hand-Delivery Address:
`Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
`1875 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`Telephone: (202) 663-6000
`Fax: (202) 663-6363
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/Thomas W. Ritchie/
`Thomas W. Ritchie (Reg. No. 65,505)
`Jones Day
`77 W. Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60601
`(312) 782-3939
`twritchie@jonesday.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
