tr [eo =
`
`Advancing Tec! oloay
`rt
`
`DECLARATION OF GERARD P. GRENIER
`
`I have never been convicted
`I, Gerard P. Grenier, am over twenty-one (21) years of age.
`of a felony, and I am fully competent to makethis declaration.
`I declare the following to be true
`to the best of my knowledge, information andbelief:
`
`1.
`
`Iam Senior Director of Publishing Technologies of The Institute of Electrical and
`Electronics Engineers, Incorporated (“IEEE”).
`
`2.
`
`IEEEis a neutral third party in IPR2019-00129.
`
`3. Neither I nor IEEEitself is being compensated for this declaration.
`
`4, Among myresponsibilities as Senior Director of Publishing Technologies, I act as a
`custodian of certain records for IEEE.
`
`5.
`
`I makethis declaration based on my personal knowledge and information contained
`in the business records of TEEE.
`
`6. Aspart of its ordinary course of business, IEEE publishes and makes available
`technical articles, proceedings and standards. These publications are made available
`for public download through the IEEE digital library, IEEE Xplore.
`
`7.
`
`Itis the regular practice of IEEE to publish articles and other writings including
`article abstracts and make them available to the public through IEEE Xplore. [EEE
`maintains copies of publications in the ordinary course of its regularly conducted
`activities.
`
`8. The article below has been attached as AttachmentA to this declaration:
`
`A.|A. Youssef, J. Haslett and E. Youssoufian, "Digitally-controlled RF
`passive attenuator in 65 nm CMOSfor mobile TV tuner ICs,"
`Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and
`
`
`Systems, May 30 — June 2, 2010.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9.
`
`I obtained a copy of Attachment A through IEEE Xplore, whereit is maintained in
`the ordinary course of IEEE’s business. AttachmentA is a true and correct copy of
`the Attachment, as it existed on or about May3, 2018.
`
`10. Thearticle and abstract from IEEE Xplore showsthe date of publication. IEEE
`Xplore populatesthis information using the metadata associated with the publication.
`
`a I
`
`INTEL 1430
`NTEL 1430
`
`4 AS Hoes Lane Piscataway, NW Neorg,
`i
`i
`
`

`

`11. A. Youssef, J. Haslett and E. Youssoufian, "Digitally-controlled RF passive
`attenuator in 65 nm CMOSfor mobile TV tuner ICs," was published in Proceedings
`of 2010 IEEEInternational Symposium on Circuits and Systems. Proceedings of
`2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems was held from May 30
`— June 2, 2010. Copies of the conference proceedings were madeavailable nolater
`than the last day of the conference. Thearticle is currently available for public
`download from the IEEE digital library, IEEE Xplore.
`
`12. I hereby declarethatall statements made herein of my own knowledgeare true and
`that all statements made on information andbelief are believed to be true, and further
`that these statements were made with the knowledgethat willful false statements and
`the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001.
`
`Executedon: S - Ifo St. ii “Al 3
`
`ff)
`|
`
`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statementsare true and correct.
`
`
`
`ii
`
`

`

`ATTACHMENT A 
`ATTACHMENT A
`
`iii
`
`

`

`5/23/2018
`IEEE.org
`
`|
`
`
`|
`
`Digitally-controlled RF passive attenuator in 65 nm CMOS for mobile TV tuner ICs - IEEE Conference Publication
`IEEE Xplore Digital Library
`
`IEEE-SA
`
`IEEE Spectrum
`
`More Sites
` Cart(0)
`
`Create Account
`
` Personal Sign In
`|
`|
`|
`|
`|
`
`|
`
`Access provided by:
`IEEE Staff
`Sign Out
`
` Back to Results
`
`Related Articles
`
`Point to point GALS interconnect
`
`An adaptively-pipelined mixed synchronous-
`asynchronous digital FIR filter chip o...
`
`View All
`
`Browse
`
`My Settings
`
`Get Help
`
`Browse Conferences > Circuits and Systems (ISCAS),...
`
`Digitally-controlled RF passive attenuator in 65 nm CMOS for
`mobile TV tuner ICs
`
`538
`Full
`Text Views
`
`3P
`
`aper
`Citations
`
`View Document
`
`3
`Author(s)
`
` Ahmed Youssef ;
`
` James Haslett ;
`
` Edward Youssoufian
`
`View All Authors
`
`Abstract
`
`Authors
`
`Figures
`
`References
`
`Citations
`
`Keywords
`
`Metrics
`
`Media
`
`Abstract:
`A novel VHF/UHF passive attenuator linearization circuit suitable for mobile TV applications has been designed and implemented in 65 nm CMOS
`technology. The proposed attenuator has a wide gain range of 48 dB that can be digitally programmed in 3 to 6 dB steps. At every gain setting, the
`input and output of the attenuator are matched to 50 Ω 2 to facilitate its integration into mobile TV tuners.
`
`Published in: Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on
`
`Date of Conference: 30 May-2 June 2010
`
` INSPEC Accession Number: 11463052
`
`Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 03 August 2010
`
`DOI: 10.1109/ISCAS.2010.5537117
`
` ISBN Information:
`
` ISSN Information:
`
`Publisher: IEEE
`
`Conference Location: Paris, France
`
` Contents
`
`SECTION I.
`Introduction
`
`Mobile TV is one of the latest features to be added to cell phones and other hand-held devices. The
`low cost, low power, and small size demands of this application have pushed researchers to use
`nanometer CMOS technologies in designing high performance tuner chip sets. The bulky RF filters
`(i.e., SAW filters) usually used in traditional TV-can tuners to suppress far-away interferer blockers
`are thus not an option for these integrated tuners. This results in tightening the linearity
`requirement of the RF front-end needed for mobile TV reception, and hence demands innovative
`design techniques to adhere to the low power necessities for this application [1].
`
`The RF-AGC (Automatic gain control) technique has been proposed recently in the literature as one
`of the low power solutions that can help mobile TV receivers achieve their stringent linearity
`requirements [2][3][4]. Decreasing the RF gain at large input signal levels helps the receiver pass
`larger signals without any degradation in the output SNR (Signal-to-Noise Ratio). Although there
`are many mechanisms to vary the RF gain in receivers, the efficacy of any given mechanism
`depends on the amount of the dynamic range that can be achieved while decreasing the RF gain.
`
` Download PDF
`
` Download Citation
`
`View References
`
` Email
`
` Print
`
` Request Permissions
`
` Alerts
`Typesetting math: 100%
`
`Full Text
`
`Authors
`
`References
`
`Citations
`
`Keywords
`
`Related Articles
`
`Back to Top
`
`https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5537117/
`
`1/7
`
` Export to Collabratec
`
`

`

`5/23/2018
`
`Digitally-controlled RF passive attenuator in 65 nm CMOS for mobile TV tuner ICs - IEEE Conference Publication
`
`This paper proposes an RF attenuator linearization circuit used to vary the RF gain of mobile TV
`receivers while maximizing their dynamic range. The paper describes a passive attenuator
`designed, implemented in 65 nm CMOS technology and characterized in the lab. Additionally, a 5
`bit linear thermometer decoder [5] integrated in the same test chip is used to program the gain of
`the attenuator. The decoder sets the gain value according to the signal level received at the
`attenuator input. Also, an on-chip programmable matching network is used to provide a stable
`input resistance to the mobile TV antenna for the entire gain range.
`
`Figure 1. RF gain control through a) a variable gain LNA or through b) RF programmable passive
`attenuator
`
`This paper is organized as follows. Section II discusses the advantages of using passive gain control
`over active gain control (i.e., Variable Gain (VG) LNA) to vary the RF gain of a mobile TV receiver.
`Section III presents the proposed RF attenuator design and demonstrates some practical issues
`dealt with in its integration with the rest of the mobile TV system. Measurement results are given in
`Section IV, and finally Section V draws the conclusions.
`
`SECTION II.
`Passive Gain Contol Versus Active
`Gain Control
`
`There are several ways to achieve gain control in RF front-ends. Fig. 1a shows a VG-LNA used to
`control the RF gain, while Fig. 1b shows a programmable passive attenuator used to control the RF
`gain. Both techniques are capable of preventing a receiver from clipping at large input signal levels
`and, in theory, either one can be used to boost the linearity of a mobile TV tuner. However, the
`difference between them becomes clear when the receiver dynamic range (DR) is taken into
`consideration. Having the attenuator control (passive control) the RF gain results in a DR value
`that is far superior to that achieved when gain is controlled by a VG - LNA (active control),
`especially at the higher attenuation (lower gain) settings.
`
`Figure 2. Simulation results show the impact of using the active gain control method versus the
`passive gain control on a receiver dynamic range
`
`Typesetting math: 100%
`
`The simulation results shown in Fig. 2 illustrate the impact of using passive versus active gain
`l
`i
`DR I
`hi
`i
`l
`i
`h DR i
`d
`b li
`i d b hi d
`d
`https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5537117/
`
`2/7
`
`50 Ω
`

`

`5/23/2018
`
`Digitally-controlled RF passive attenuator in 65 nm CMOS for mobile TV tuner ICs - IEEE Conference Publication
`control on receiver DR. In this simulation, the DR is assumed to be limited by third order
`nonlinearity (IIP3). When passive gain control is used, the clipping level and the system IIP3
`improve by one dB for every one dB increase in the attenuation, and the dynamic range value is
`preserved. However, at certain gain settings (Y in Fig. 2), the system IIP3 will be limited by the
`attenuator IIP3 and therefore the DR will start to decrease. Passive gain control results in higher
`DR value than active control due to the fact that LNAs are generally less linear than attenuators,
`and thus DR decreases much earlier when gain is controlled by a VG-LNA (X in Fig.2). Therefore,
`using the attenuator to control the RF gain in this case maximizes the receiver dynamic range.
`
`SECTION III.
`RF Programmble Passive Attenuator
`
`The design of an RF attenuator suitable for use in mobile TV applications presents several
`challenges. Such an attenuator has to achieve certain characteristics so that it can protect the RF
`performance of a mobile TV receiver in the presence of interferer blockers as high as 0 dBm.
`Typically, it should provide from 40 dB to 50 dB gain range in steps of 3–6 dB [6]. Also, it should
`have a
` input impedance to allow maximum power to transfer from the antenna or to provide
`the right termination for the GSM SAW filter. Additionally, it should provide a
` output
`matching so that it would not affect the LNA noise figure [7]. The input and output matching
`should remain constant throughout the entire gain range of the attenuator.
`
`A. Binary Weighted Passive Attenuator
`
`The design of the binary weighted attenuator network is shown in Fig. 3. The value of
`was chosen so that the output matching to the LNA would be verified for every attenuation setting.
`There are eight control bits (vcont7-vcont0) to program the attenuator for different gain settings.
`
`Figure 3. RF passive attenuator with the input matching network
`
`These control bits can be set in a thermometer code fashion in order to achieve 6 dB attenuation
`steps. The highest gain setting (−6 dB) is when all control bits are set HIGH and the lowest (−48
`dB) is when they are set LOW. An enable bit is included to activate the attenuator path when it is
`necessary to improve the receiver linearity. All bits control the gates of NMOS switch transistors.
`S it h i
`l
`t d t
`i
`i
`i
`th
`ff
`t t
`it
`hil
`till
`idi
`ffi i
`tl
`https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5537117/
`
`Typesetting math: 100%
`
`3/7
`
`50 Ω
`50 Ω
`R = 50 Ω
`

`

`5/23/2018
`
`Digitally-controlled RF passive attenuator in 65 nm CMOS for mobile TV tuner ICs - IEEE Conference Publication
`Switch sizes were selected to minimize the off-state capacitance while still providing a sufficiently
`small resistance in the on-state compared to the resistance being switched. Although the binary
`weighted attenuator achieves the required gain range and also achieves the output matching
`requirement, it still needs to provide the matching to the mobile TV antenna.
`
`A programmable matching network (shown in Fig. 3) was added at the input of the attenuator to
`provide the required input matching at different gain settings. This network can be programmed by
`two bits called m0 and m1 (see Table I). Adding the matching network modifies attenuation values
`of the binary weighted attenuator. However, as shown in Table I the attenuation step of 3 dB to 6
`dB can still be achieved.
`
`TABLE I. The Gain Values of The RF Attenuator Including The Input Matching
`
`Input
`Matching
`m0
`m1
`
`Decoder
`Input
`A <4:0>
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`
`0
`0
`0
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`
`9
`8
`7
`6
`5
`4
`3
`2
`1
`0
`
`Thermometer Decoder Output
`
`enable vcont
`7
`x
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`
`vcont
`6
`x
`1
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`vcont
`5
`x
`1
`1
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`vcont
`4
`x
`1
`1
`1
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`vcont
`3
`x
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`vcont
`2
`x
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`0
`0
`0
`
`vcont
`1
`x
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`0
`0
`
`vcont
`0
`x
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`0
`
`Gain
`(dB)
`OPEN
`−6
`−9
`−13
`−18
`−24
`−30
`−36
`−42
`−48
`
`B. The Attenuator Bandwidth
`Integrating the designed attenuator linearization circuit with the LNA requires some design
`modifications to avoid any undesirable interactions between the two. Connecting the attenuator to
`the LNA might create different DC paths for the LNA through the MOS switches M1, M2, and M3
`(shown in Fig. 3) which might result in severe degradation of its performance. Therefore, AC
`coupling capacitors (C1, C2, and C3) are added to the attenuator to avoid any disturbances in the
`operating points of the LNA devices. It is of note that the capacitance values of these capacitors
`would set the lower frequency limit of the attenuator, which would be the VHF frequency for the
`mobile TV applications.
`
`SECTION IV.
`Measurements Results
`
`The proposed RF attenuator was fabricated in 65 nm CMOS technology. The MOS switches were
`designed taking their “on resistance” and their parasitic capacitance into consideration. The N-well-
`based MOS cap was used to implement the attenuator AC coupling caps to save the receiver die
`area. To support the VHF band, 70 pF and 30 pF capacitances were chosen for the attenuator (C3)
`and the matching network caps (C1&C2) respectively. The RF attenuator die photo is shown in Fig.
`4. The fabricated chip consumes
` of silicon.
`
`The attenuator die was characterized in the lab. The HP 8753D network analyzer was used for S-
`parameter measurements. The output matching of the attenuator to a
` resistance was tested by
`measuring
`. Fig. 5 shows the measured
` for different gain code settings across the UHF band.
`Measured values of
` were less than −13 dB for all gain settings across the UHF band. The same
`test was repeated to evaluate the attenuator input matching to a
` source resistance. Measured
`values of
` were less than −12 dB for all gain settings across the UHF band as shown in Fig. 6.
`
`Noise analysis was conducted using the noise mode of the Agilent E4408B spectrum analyzer. Fig.
`7 shows the NF measurements of the attenuator for all gain settings across the UHF band. The loss
`of the SMA connectors and the coax cable ranging from 0.7 dB to 1.2 dB was removed from the
`measurement. The NF measurements agree with the attenuation values reported in Table I.
`
`Typesetting math: 100%
`
`https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5537117/
`
`4/7
`
`0.05mm
`2
`50 Ω
`S
`22
`S
`22
`S
`22
`50 Ω
`S
`11
`

`

`5/23/2018
`
`Digitally-controlled RF passive attenuator in 65 nm CMOS for mobile TV tuner ICs - IEEE Conference Publication
`
`Figure 4. Die photograph of the proposed RF attenuator
`
`TABLE II. Measurement results summary
`
`65 nm CMOS
`
`Technology
`Die area
`1.2 V
`Power supply
`Noise Figure (NF) max 48 dB
`min 5.8 dB
`100 MHz
`~ 3-6 dB
`
`Gain steps
` for all gain settings
` for all gain settings
`In-band (IIP3)
`max +25.3 dBm
`min +23 dBm
`
`One of the most critical measurements for the attenuator is the third order nonlinearity (IIP3) since
`the receiver DR might be limited by this value at lower gain settings. A two-tone test was conducted
`by applying two tones that were spaced by 4 MHz. Fig. 8 illustrates a two-tone test measurement
`for one of the attenuator gain settings (−6 dB gain mode). The IIP3 is calculated to be +25 dBm.
`The same test was conducted for all gain settings of the attenuator. It was noticed that the IIP3
`values degraded by 1 dB to 2 dB at lower gain settings (shown in Fig. 9). The measurement results
`of the RF passive attenuator are summarized in Table II.
`
`SECTION V.
`Conclusion
`
`A novel RF attenuator linearization circuit has been proposed to overcome the shortcomings of
`having the VG-LNA alone control the mobile TV front-end gain. The attenuator designed in 65 nm
`CMOS technology enables a low power, highly linear, wide dynamic range front-end realization
`with low noise figure at sensitivity level. The attenuator design can be scaled to any application that
`requires a wide dynamic range RF front-end.
`
`Figure 5. Measured output matching (
`swept from 400 MHz to 800 MHz
`
`) for different gain code settings. The frequency was
`
`Typesetting math: 100%
`
`https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5537117/
`
`5/7
`
`0.05mm
`2
`_low
`f
`c
`S
`11
`< −12dBm
`S
`22
`< −13dBm
`S
`22
`

`

`5/23/2018
`
`Digitally-controlled RF passive attenuator in 65 nm CMOS for mobile TV tuner ICs - IEEE Conference Publication
`
`Figure 6. Measured input matching (
`swept from 400 MHz to 800 MHz
`
`) for different gain code settings. The frequency was
`
`Figure 7. Measured NF for different gain settings
`
`Figure 8. Linearity measurement for (−6 dB) gain mode
`
`Figure 9. IIP3 measurement for different gain modes
`
`Authors
`
`References
`
`Typesetting math: 100%
`
`Ci
`i
`https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5537117/
`
`
`
`
`
`6/7
`
`1S
`1
`

`

`5/23/2018
`
`Digitally-controlled RF passive attenuator in 65 nm CMOS for mobile TV tuner ICs - IEEE Conference Publication
`Citations
`
`
`
`Keywords
`
`Related Articles
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IEEE Account
`
` Purchase Details
`
` Profile Information
`
` Need Help?
`
`» Change Username/Password
`» Update Address
`
`» Payment Options
`» Order History
`» View Purchased Documents
`
`» Communications Preferences
`» Profession and Education
`» Technical Interests
`
`» US & Canada: +1 800 678 4333
`» Worldwide: +1 732 981 0060
`» Contact & Support
`
`|
`
`About IEEE Xplore
`
`
`|
`
`Contact Us
`
`
`|
`
`Help
`
`
`|
`
`Accessibility
`
`
`|
`
`Terms of Use
`
`
`|
`
`Nondiscrimination Policy
`
`
`|
`
`Sitemap
`
`
`|
`
`Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies
`
`A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity.
`© Copyright 2018 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.
`
`Typesetting math: 100%
`
`https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5537117/
`
`7/7
`
`

`

`Digitally-Controlled RF Passive Attenuator in 65 nm
`CMOS for Mobile TV Tuner ICs
`
`Ahmed Youssef and James Haslett
`Electrical and Computer Engineering Department
`University of Calgary
`Alberta, Canada
`
`Edward Youssoufian
`Newport Media Inc.
`Lake Forest, California, USA
`
`Abstract—A novel VHF/UHF passive attenuator linearization
`circuit suitable for mobile TV applications has been designed
`and implemented in 65 nm CMOS technology. The proposed
`attenuator has a wide gain range of 48 dB that can be digitally
`programmed in 3 to 6 dB steps. At every gain setting, the input
`and output of the attenuator are matched to 50 Ω to facilitate its
`integration into mobile TV tuners.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`Mobile TV is one of the latest features to be added to cell
`phones and other hand-held devices. The low cost, low power,
`and small size demands of this application have pushed
`researchers to use nanometer CMOS technologies in designing
`high performance tuner chip sets. The bulky RF filters (i.e.,
`SAW filters) usually used in traditional TV-can tuners to
`suppress far-away interferer blockers are thus not an option for
`these integrated tuners. This results in tightening the linearity
`requirement of the RF front-end needed for mobile TV
`reception, and hence demands innovative design techniques to
`adhere to the low power necessities for this application [1].
` The RF-AGC (Automatic gain control) technique has
`been proposed recently in the literature as one of the low
`power solutions that can help mobile TV receivers achieve
`their stringent linearity requirements [2]-[4]. Decreasing the
`RF gain at large input signal levels helps the receiver pass
`larger signals without any degradation in the output SNR
`(Signal-to-Noise Ratio). Although there are many mechanisms
`to vary the RF gain in receivers, the efficacy of any given
`mechanism depends on the amount of the dynamic range that
`can be achieved while decreasing the RF gain.
`This paper proposes an RF attenuator linearization circuit
`used to vary the RF gain of mobile TV receivers while
`maximizing their dynamic range. The paper describes a
`passive attenuator designed, implemented in 65 nm CMOS
`technology and characterized in the lab. Additionally, a 5 bit
`linear thermometer decoder [5] integrated in the same test chip
`is used to program the gain of the attenuator. The decoder sets
`the gain value according to the signal level received at the
`attenuator input. Also, an on-chip programmable matching
`network is used to provide a stable 50 Ω input resistance
`
`RFin
`
`LNA
`
`(a)
`
`RF Attenuator
`
`RFin
`
`LNA
`
`(b)
`
`Figure 1. RF gain control through a) a variable gain LNA or through b) RF
`programmable passive attenuator.
`
`to the mobile TV antenna for the entire gain range.
`This paper is organized as follows. Section II discusses the
`advantages of using passive gain control over active gain
`control (i.e., Variable Gain (VG) LNA) to vary the RF gain of
`a mobile TV receiver. Section III presents the proposed RF
`attenuator design and demonstrates some practical issues dealt
`with in its integration with the rest of the mobile TV system.
`Measurement results are given in Section IV, and finally
`Section V draws the conclusions.
`
`II.
`
`PASSIVE GAIN CONTOL VERSUS ACTIVE
`GAIN CONTROL
`There are several ways to achieve gain control in RF front-
`ends. Fig. 1a shows a VG-LNA used to control the RF gain,
`while Fig. 1b shows a programmable passive attenuator used
`to control the RF gain. Both techniques are capable of
`preventing a receiver from clipping at large input signal levels
`and, in theory, either one can be used to boost the linearity of a
`mobile TV tuner. However, the difference between them
`becomes clear when the receiver dynamic range (DR) is taken
`into consideration. Having the attenuator control (passive
`control) the RF gain results in a DR value that is far superior
`to
`that
`achieved when
`gain
`is
`controlled
`by
`a VG - LNA ( active control ), especially at the higher
`
`978-1-4244-5309-2/10/$26.00 ©2010 IEEE
`
`1999
`
`

`

`R
`
`2R
`
`4R
`
`8R
`
`16R
`
`32R
`
`64R
`
`128R
`
`128R
`
`vcont7
`
`128x
`vcont6
`
`64x
`vcont5
`
`32x
`vcont4
`
`16x
`vcont3
`
`8x
`vcont2
`
`4x
`vcont1
`
`vcont0
`
`enable
`
`2x
`
`1x
`
`1x
`
`Clipping level for the
` LNA and the attenuator
`
`Attenuator IIP3
`
`LNA IIP3 could limit the
`receiver IIP3
`
`-10
`
`0
`
`Y
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`
`X
`
`Dynamic range decreases
`nearly 25 dB in case of
`LNA gain control method
`
`Binary
`Weighted
`Attenuator
`
`Sensitivity
`IIP3
`IIP3
` Sensitivity
`
`Sensitivity
`
`Gain, dB
`
`60
`
`30
`
`0
`
`-20
`
`-30
`
`-60
`
`-90
`
`-120
`
`Power, dBm
`
`Figure 2. Simulation results show the impact of using the active gain control
`method versus the passive gain control on a receiver dynamic range.
`
`attenuation (lower gain) settings.
`The simulation results shown in Fig.2 illustrate the impact
`of using passive versus active gain control on receiver DR. In
`this simulation, the DR is assumed to be limited by third order
`nonlinearity (IIP3). When passive gain control is used, the
`clipping level and the system IIP3 improve by one dB for
`every one dB increase in the attenuation, and the dynamic
`range value is preserved. However, at certain gain settings (Y
`in Fig. 2), the system IIP3 will be limited by the attenuator
`IIP3 and therefore the DR will start to decrease. Passive gain
`control results in higher DR value than active control due to
`the fact that LNAs are generally less linear than attenuators,
`and thus DR decreases much earlier when gain is controlled
`by a VG-LNA (X in Fig.2). Therefore, using the attenuator to
`control the RF gain in this case maximizes the receiver
`dynamic range.
`
`III. RF PROGRAMMBLE PASSIVE ATTENUATOR
`The design of an RF attenuator suitable for use in mobile
`TV applications presents several challenges. Such an
`attenuator has to achieve certain characteristics so that it can
`protect the RF performance of a mobile TV receiver in the
`presence of interferer blockers as high as 0 dBm. Typically, it
`should provide from 40 dB to 50 dB gain range in steps of 3-6
`dB [6]. Also, it should have a 50 Ω input impedance to allow
`maximum power to transfer from the antenna or to provide the
`right termination for the GSM SAW filter. Additionally, it
`should provide a 50 Ω output matching so that it would not
`affect the LNA noise figure [7]. The input and output
`matching should remain constant throughout the entire gain
`range of the attenuator.
`A. Binary Weighted Passive Attenuator
`The design of the binary weighted attenuator network is
`shown in Fig. 3. The value of R = 50 Ω was chosen so that the
`output matching to the LNA would be verified for every
`attenuation setting. There are eight control bits (vcont7-
`vcont0) to program the attenuator for different gain settings.
`
`RFin
`
`2R
`
`2R
`
`Matching
` Network
`
`R
`
`m0
`
`M1
`
`M2
`
`m1
`
`enable
`
`M3
`
`C1
`
`C2
`
`C3
`
`A<4:0>
`
`Control Logic
`
`RFout
`
`50 Ω
`LNA
`Zin
`
`Figure 3. RF passive attenuator with the input matching network.
`
`These control bits can be set in a thermometer code fashion in
`order to achieve 6 dB attenuation steps. The highest gain
`setting (-6 dB) is when all control bits are set HIGH and the
`lowest (-48 dB) is when they are set LOW. An enable bit is
`included to activate the attenuator path when it is
`necessary to improve the receiver linearity. All bits control
`the gates of NMOS switch transistors. Switch sizes were
`selected to minimize the off-state capacitance while still
`providing a sufficiently small resistance in the on-state
`compared to the resistance being switched. Although the
`binary weighted attenuator achieves the required gain range
`and also achieves the output matching requirement, it still
`needs to provide the matching to the mobile TV antenna.
`A programmable matching network (shown in Fig. 3) was
`added at the input of the attenuator to provide the required
`input matching at different gain settings. This network can be
`programmed by two bits called m0 and m1 (see Table I).
`Adding the matching network modifies attenuation values of
`the binary weighted attenuator. However, as shown in Table I
`the attenuation step of 3 dB to 6 dB can still be achieved.
`
`2000
`
`

`

`
`TABLE I. THE GAIN VALUES OF THE RF ATTENUATOR INCLUDING THE INPUT MATCHING
`Decoder
`Thermometer Decoder Output
`Input
`
`A
`<4:0>
`9
`8
`7
`6
`5
`4
`3
`2
`1
`0
`
`enable
`
`0
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`
`vcont
`7
`x
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`vcont
`6
`x
`1
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`vcont
`5
`x
`1
`1
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`vcont
`4
`x
`1
`1
`1
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`vcont
`3
`x
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`vcont
`2
`x
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`0
`0
`0
`
`vcont
`1
`x
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`0
`0
`
`vcont
`0
`x
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`0
`
`Gain
`(dB)
`OPEN
`-6
`-9
`-13
`-18
`-24
`-30
`-36
`-42
`-48
`
`Input
`Matching
`
`m0 m1
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`
`0
`0
`0
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`
`B. The Attenuator Bandwidth
`Integrating the designed attenuator linearization circuit
`with the LNA requires some design modifications to avoid
`any undesirable interactions between the two. Connecting the
`attenuator to the LNA might create different DC paths for the
`LNA through the MOS switches M1, M2, and M3 (shown in
`Fig. 3) which might result in severe degradation of its
`performance. Therefore, AC coupling capacitors (C1, C2, and
`C3) are added to the attenuator to avoid any disturbances in
`the operating points of the LNA devices. It is of note that the
`capacitance values of these capacitors would set the lower
`frequency limit of the attenuator, which would be the VHF
`frequency for the mobile TV applications.
`
`IV. MEASUREMENTS RESULTS
`The proposed RF attenuator was fabricated in 65 nm
`CMOS technology. The MOS switches were designed taking
`their “on resistance” and their parasitic capacitance into
`consideration. The N-well-based MOS cap was used to
`implement the attenuator AC coupling caps to save the
`receiver die area. To support the VHF band, 70 pF and 30 pF
`capacitances were chosen for the attenuator (C3) and the
`matching network caps (C1&C2) respectively. The RF
`attenuator die photo is shown in Fig. 4. The fabricated chip
`consumes 0.05 mm2 of silicon.
`The attenuator die was characterized in the lab. The HP
`8753D network analyzer was used
`for S-parameter
`measurements. The output matching of the attenuator to a 50
`Ω resistance was tested by measuring S22. Fig. 5 shows the
`measured S22 for different gain code settings across the UHF
`band. Measured values of S22 were less than -13 dB for all
`gain settings across the UHF band. The same test was repeated
`to evaluate the attenuator input matching to a 50 Ω source
`resistance. Measured values of S11 were less than -12 dB for
`all gain settings across the UHF band as shown in Fig. 6.
`Noise analysis was conducted using the noise mode of the
`Agilent E4408B spectrum analyzer. Fig. 7 shows the NF
`measurements of the attenuator for all gain settings across the
`UHF band. The loss of the SMA connectors and the coax
`cable ranging from 0.7 dB to 1.2 dB was removed from the
`measurement. The NF measurements agree with
`the
`attenuation values reported in Table I.
`
`RESISTIVE
`DIVIDER
`
`Figure 4. Die photograph of the proposed RF attenuator.
`
`TABLE II. MEASUREMENT RESULTS SUMMARY.
`Technology
`65 nm CMOS
`0.05 mm2
`Die area
`Power supply
`1.2 V
`Noise Figure
`48 dB
` (NF)
`5.8 dB
`fc_low
`100 MHz
`Gain steps
` ~ 3-6 dB
`S11 for all gain settings
`<-12 dBm
`S22 for all gain settings
`<-13 dBm
`max
`In-band
`+25.3 dBm
` (IIP3)
`min
`+23 dBm
`
`max
`min
`
`One of the most critical measurements for the attenuator is
`the third order nonlinearity (IIP3) since the receiver DR might
`be limited by this value at lower gain settings. A two-tone test
`was conducted by applying two tones that were spaced by 4
`MHz. Fig. 8 illustrates a two-tone test measurement for one of
`the attenuator gain settings (-6 dB gain mode). The IIP3 is
`calculated to be +25 dBm. The same test was conducted for all
`gain settings of the attenuator. It was noticed that the IIP3
`values degraded by 1 dB to 2 dB at lower gain settings (shown
`in Fig. 9). The measurement results of the RF passive
`attenuator are summarized in Table II.
`
`V. CONCLUSION
`A novel RF attenuator linearization circuit has been
`proposed to overcome the shortcomings of having the VG-
`LNA alone control the mobile TV front-end gain. The
`attenuator designed in 65 nm CMOS technology enables a low
`power, highly linear, wide dynamic range front-end realization
`with low noise figure at sensitivity level. The attenuator
`design can be scaled to any application that requires a wide
`dynamic range RF front-end.
`
`2001
`
`

`

`S22,
`(dB)
`
`0
`
`-5
`
`-10
`
`-15
`
`-20
`
`-25
`
`-30
`
`-35
`400.0
`
`480.0
`
`560.0
`640.0
`Frequency, MHz
`
`720.0
`
`800.0
`
`code0
`code 1
`code 2
`code 3
`code 4
`code 5
`code 6
`code 7
`code 8
`code 9
`code 10
`code 11
`code 12
`code 13
`code 14.
`
`0
`
`-5
`
`-10
`S11,
`(dB)
`-15
`
`-20
`
`-25
`
`-30
`400.00
`
`480.00
`
`640.00
`560.00
`Frequency, MHz
`
`720.00
`
`800.00
`
`code 0
`code 1
`code 2
`code 3
`code 4.0
`code 5
`code
`code 7
`code 8
`code 9
`code 10
`code 11
`code 12
`code 13
`code 14
`
`Figure 5. Measured output matching (S22) for different gain code settings.
`The frequency was swept from 400 MHz to 800 MHz.
`
`Figure 6. Measured input matching (S11) for different gain code settings.
` The frequency was swept from 400 MHz to 800 MHz.
`
`IP3 ~ + 25.5dBm
`
`0
`
`10
`Input Level, dBm
`
`20
`
`30
`
`20
`
`0
`
`-20
`
`-40
`
`-60
`
`Tone Levels [input referred], dBm
`
`-80
`
`-10
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`Gain Codes
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`0
`
`NF, dB
`
`Figure 7. Measured NF for different gain settings.
`
`Figure 8. Linearity measurement for (-6 dB) gain mode.
`
`26
`
`25.5
`
`25
`IP3, dBm
`
`24.5
`
`24
`
`23.5
`
`23
`
`22.5
`
`1
`
`2
`
`34
`
`6
`
`5
`Code
`
`7
`
`8
`
`Figure 9. IIP3 measurement for different gain modes.
`
`REFERENCES
`[1] T. Shinyaitos, O. AlsushiSakail, M. Okazaki, M. Nagsumim, A.
`Saitow, K. Kioi, and M. Koutani, “A Digital TV Receiver RF and BB
`Chipset with Adaptive Bias-Current Control for Mobile Applications,”
`IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, San Francisco, pp.
`212-213, February 2007.
`[2] Y.J. Kim, J.W. Kim, V.N. Parkhomenko, D. Baek, J.H. Lee, E.Y. Sung,
`and I. Nam, “A Multi-Band Multi-Mode CMOS Direct-Conversion
`DVB-H Tuner,” IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference,
`San Francisco, pp. 2